Todd Frazier’s Power Explosion

Blind comparisons are always fun. They’re fun because we have set notions about who players are, and when we strip away names, similarities that we didn’t think possible come to the surface. With that said, here are two players:

BB% K% HR ISO BABIP wRC+ WAR
Player A 7.9% 18.2% 22 .345 .289 172 3.8
Player B 7.6% 18.3% 17 .252 .327 154 3.9

Player A, as you might have guessed by the title of the article, is Todd Frazier. Player B — he of the lower ISO and almost exact same strikeout and walk rates — is Josh Donaldson. An oft-used term is “the poor man’s version of so and so,” but currently, Frazier isn’t the poor man’s version of anyone — in fact, he’s been one of the best players in baseball through the first two months of the season. Donaldson is too, and he probably plays a little better defense than Frazier does.

However, the Reds third baseman is up there: he has almost the same WAR (3.8) as Mike Trout (3.9), and his current ISO is third only to Bryce Harper and Giancarlo Stanton’s. That doesn’t mean Frazier will finish this season with the same WAR as Trout, or the same ISO as Harper or Stanton, but it’s interesting and requires our attention.

There should probably be a little caveat here, and it’s that Frazier has hit four home runs in his last two games (he sat on Thursday). His ISO was .31o on Tuesday, but he’s been on a tear since then, culminating in a walk-off grand slam on Wednesday night. It was a good one:

Despite his incredible 22.4% HR/FB rate, which might be ripe for regression, Frazier is displaying a few markers that tell us this incredible power output could have some reality behind it. Let’s start with this chart, of his home-run and fly-ball distance over his career compared to the league average:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Frazier_HRFB

Last year was good: top-40-in-the-league good. He was bracketed on either side by Yasiel Puig (38th) and Andrew McCutchen (40th) to give you an idea of the company. This year? He’s just inside the top 20 (20th, to be exact), after tacking on an extra 10 feet of average distance. Fly-ball distance isn’t everything, especially after only two months, but hitting the ball further is always a good thing, and Frazier is hitting a lot of balls very far.

There’s a lot that goes into home runs (not just distance), so let’s look at some other places that might explain Frazier’s power surge, and where he might have improved. First up — spray charts. Where are his home runs and fly balls going this year? From 2012 to this year:

Frazier_Spray_Chart

Frazier has always been a guy who had an even distribution of his home runs across fields, with a slight lean toward right field for his fly balls. Not in 2015. We can see his propensity to pull the ball has increased dramatically this season, with all but one of his home runs going to left or center field. We’ve seen the kind of power jumps that players can have when they start pulling their fly balls more; couple that tendency with a major increase in fly-ball distance (into top-20-in-the-majors territory), and you have the makings of a big year.

A point to remember: Eno ran the year-to-year correlation of pull percentage in an article from last year, and found that players have about a 50/50 shot of carrying over the change to the following year. This could be the new Frazier, but it could also just be a great two month stretch in a long career — it’s best to temper our expectations a bit.

With that out of the way, what are the changes he’s shown at the plate that have caused this power surge? Lest you think Frazier is only feasting on inside pitches and pulling them to left field, here’s a map of his home runs to left and center field this year, courtesy of Baseball Savant:

Frazier_L_C_HRs_2015

He’s pulling or going to center with power everywhere he’s being pitched — inside, over the plate, outside. Much of the improvement he’s showing this year is simply better contact, as he’s posting career-bests in Z-Contact% and overall Contact%. In that same vein, take a look at his ISO per pitch in different parts of the zone for 2012-2014 vs. 2015:

Frazier_Plate_Coverage_ISO

Besides hitting pitches in almost all parts of the zone for power, it’s the high pitch that he’s punished the most this year. His swing rates also show that he’s swinging at more high pitches over previous years (most likely to try and drive them), so it makes sense that he’s posting the highest fly-ball rate of his career, at 48.5%. His infield-fly-ball rate has also almost doubled over the past two years (to 16.3%), so this seems like a conscious decision to try to get under the ball. How about this — let’s do a quick a quick side-by-side comparison of his swing from last year vs. this year to see if we can notice anything glaringly different:

Frazier_Compare

On the left, we have Frazier from August of 2014, and on the right we have this past Wednesday night. One is a fastball and one is a hanging curve, yes, but from my eyes there really isn’t too much of a difference. Maybe a bit more weightiness to the swing this year, with more body and less arm action, but that could just be my imagination. I’m not a swing mechanics expert, so I’ll leave it to more expert minds than mine to discern the finer details and differences.

Is Frazier going to hit 60 home runs? Probably not. His HR/FB% is almost sure to regress, and pitching adjustments are bound to happen. But hitting 22 home runs by mid-June while posting elite batted-ball distance is the way you have a monster year, and he’s already there. He’s done it by being strong, hitting a ton of fly balls, and pulling the ball more. Whether Frazier continues to find this level of success with that approach is the only question. Is it time to start talking about Frazier as one of the better power hitters in baseball, if not at least one of the most underrated? Given how we talk about the likes of Donaldson and Stanton, yes, it probably is.





Owen Watson writes for FanGraphs and The Hardball Times. Follow him on Twitter @ohwatson.

24 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Chino_S
11 years ago

The swings are the same. In fact, Frazier’s swing is the same as it was in 2013. The difference has been his change to a longer bat. This can be real beneficial for guy who swings with a front elbow that is almost locked (not much bend as he gets into his swing). It allows him to cover the plate more without making small adjustments with his forearms while ball is in flight. He can still drive pitches away because of the length and his position in the box. And he can still hit balls hard that are going to be inside by hitting them further out in front of the plate.

Its a way of maximizing your power production without having make changes to your swing. Sometimes its a simple as that. Not really all about this metrics crunching. Expect it to continue until he has an upper body injury or right handers decide to throw him cutters that start inside off the plate that move towards the black of the plate (Luckily for Frazier, there isn’t really anybody who does this consistently).

jorgesca
11 years ago
Reply to  Chino_S

Why didn’t he do it sooner?

M W
11 years ago
Reply to  Chino_S

He also added 20 pounds of muscle during this past offseason – which he’s obviously using.

Rick Thurman
11 years ago
Reply to  M W

That’s an enormous exaggeration. Ask any bodybuilder if it’s possible to add 20lbs of muscle without steroids in 6 months. They’d probably say yes only if the lifter was a skinny shrimp who never lifted before. Not the case with Frazier.

ashlandateam
11 years ago

As a Reds fan, watching Todd Frazier every day (along with Votto, and Hamilton, and a smattering of others) doesn’t quite make up for having to root for a team with a front office that refuses to progress past 1998. But it’s something, and some weeks, it’s close.

tct
11 years ago

Frazier and Donaldson have so many similarities that it’s creepy. Same age, same position, same draft class, same draft round, both made the majors at an age that was old for a prospect which caused them both to be a bit under rated.

Donaldson has been a bit better, but I’ve really been baffled at how so many baseball analysts, especially on Fangraphs, value them so differently. Donaldson was 17th in the trade value list in the off season, while Frazier didn’t even make the top 50. Donaldson had an extra year of control, but he was also super 2. This is not a knock on Donaldson, he’s awesome, but more of a question why Frazier has been so under rated. Almost every list I saw this off season of regression candidates had Frazier on it. And Frazier was mentioned several times in the Bold Predictions series, and all of the predictions were negative. But there wasn’t really any solid evidence to point toward regression, it was more like people just didn’t expect him to be this good.

UpNort
11 years ago
Reply to  tct

It’s because Frazier’s had a ‘down’ year (primarily may through Aug of 2013) where he burned a lot of fantasy owners. Donaldson’s not yet had a bad year and is more valuable in bop and points leagues.

UpNort
11 years ago
Reply to  UpNort

Obp leagues….damned autocorrect.

Sean O'Neill
11 years ago

I took a look at Frazier about a week ago and reached much the same conclusions (article linked), but there’s a couple additional points worth noting. First, it’s not simply better contact, it’s a better approach. He’s swinging more at pitches in the zone, less at pitches out of it, swinging more at fastballs, and way less at offspeed stuff. Second, he’s really keying on those fastballs in the zone when he’s ahead in the count. His approach seems to change in those instances to really pull the ball, and he’s gotten a significant portion of his home runs on exactly those pitches.

ZachTheQuack
11 years ago

The swing change Frazier has made is a subtle one, but an important one. In fact, the GIFs you have chosen perfectly illustrate the point so one can take what I’m about to say in my comment and directly apply that knowledge. 🙂

In the GIF on the left (August, 2014) one can see Frazier turn his upper body backwards in a coiling motion—something most easily seen by the closing of the right shoulder and the raising of the back elbow during the load phase. This coiling of the full upper body increases the length of the swing and also maintains the original angle between the arms and body set during the pre-load phase. This is not, in itself, poor mechanics provided one makes sure to set one’s arms on the desired plane before launching into one’s swing (which Frazier does); however, there are more efficient ways to create higher bat speed and Frazier’s new mechanics reflect an increase in efficiency.

Frazier’s new swing seen on the right (recent) has a different load sequence. Frazier does not rotate his full upper body backwards to load; rather, he increases the angle between his arms and his body by moving his hands and arms away from the pitcher and back around his body a slight bit while not rotating his trunk. While this difference is subtle, it employs mechanics first popularized in the golf swing: the kinetic sequence. By increasing the tension in his triceps and upper back to their optimal load point with these new mechanics he’s better able to keep his arms at pace with his body and to transfer his radial momentum into the linear momentum of an un-cocking double pendulum system (body and arms are pendulum one; arms and bat are pendulum two) akin to other ballistic firing motions: swinging a golf club, throwing a baseball, kicking a football, &c.

I hope I’ve been clear with my terms—if not, let me know and I’ll see if I can’t clean up my verbiage.

Pro Scout
11 years ago
Reply to  ZachTheQuack

Check again. His swing has just as much torso rotation during the load. Try to tell which swing is which based on the upper body in this comparison.

http://gfycat.com/GoodCompleteCentipede

Here is the comparison at the end of his stride. same torso rotation.

http://gfycat.com/GoodCompleteCentipede#?frameNum=79

recovering pedant
11 years ago
Reply to  Pro Scout

The main difference is that in the swing on the left, he is definitely wearing red. (Seriously, it’s otherwise eerily similar and evidence of a consistent approach!)

ZachTheQuack
11 years ago
Reply to  Pro Scout

The one on the left is the recent one, the one on the right is from a past year. To me the distinction is clear so let me attempt to make it more clear to others.

In the image on the left Frazier’s arms and upper shoulders load while his belly button remains pointed at the plate—this type of load increases tension in the primary zones of momentum transfer (think middle of rib cage through to the fingertips). In the image on the right you see that his rotation includes his lower trunk, most easily measurable in a qualifiable sense by watching his belly button turn back towards the umpire before starting his swing forward.

This might seem like a small change but it’s the difference between stretching a rubber band in length versus simply rotating an entire rubber band system. The stretch both increases the potential for release compared to simple rotation as well as increasing the efficiency of momentum transfer.

xaq
11 years ago
Reply to  ZachTheQuack

The one on the right is the newest swing. It was from his walk off grand slam the other day

ZachTheQuack
11 years ago
Reply to  ZachTheQuack

I meant the one on the right from the linked side by side gifs in the comment to which I’m responding. David Hale is now with Colorado so it would be a little hard for him to be wearing a Braves uniform this year…

recovering pedant
11 years ago
Reply to  ZachTheQuack

I disagree – you can see the obliques moving more clearly in the swing on the right.

recovering pedant
11 years ago

(to be clear, I was disagreeing with Zach and agreeing with “Pro Scout”)

Only Glove, No Love
11 years ago

Really dug this article. First rate. The batted ball images really made your point. Cool.

Only Glove, No Love
11 years ago

Just noticed Frazier had a pretty aggro bat-flip on the first GIF…

M W
11 years ago

It was a walk off grandslam 6.5 hours into the game, you’d have one too.

Only Glove, No Love
11 years ago
Reply to  M W

Ha! I imagine that was the cherry on top of quite the satisfying experience for Mr Frazier.

Voxx
11 years ago

Heh. I’d imagine it had an element of ‘fucking finally’ to it, after that many hours/innings.

D.K. WillardsonMember since 2020
11 years ago

I see a couple of things contributing to the increased power. First is the lower body. Hips are counter rotating more so that is why the swing looks less “armsy” – it is. If you look at many power hitters, they tend to do this (see Bryce Harper). If you look closely you can see the difference. Second (possibly even a larger factor) is he seems to have changed his contact point on the ball – hitting below the equator more so more fly balls, more IFFBs, more HRs, more backspin. Generally, hitters “pay” for this in terms of reduced contact but that doesn’t seem to be the case (yet?)