Trading Cheesesteaks for Cheese Curds, Rhys Hoskins Joins the Brewers

Bill Streicher-USA TODAY Sports
The free agent market is finally starting to move. Rhys Hoskins is headed to Milwaukee, finalizing a two-year, $34 million contract with an opt-out after the first year, per Scoop Czar Jeff Passan. You don’t have to squint to see the fit here. Milwaukee needs hitting, Hoskins needs a place to hit, and it’s always nice to feel wanted. The option effectively makes this a pillow contract for Hoskins, who ruptured his ACL in spring training and missed the entire 2023 season. (This seems like a good place to note that the deal is almost certainly still pending a physical.) If he proves that he can still hit like Rhys Hoskins, he can opt out and go after a bigger deal while he’s still a fresh-faced 31-year-old with the world at his feet, rather than a doddering, unemployable 32-year-old. If he needs another year to knock the rust off, well, I’ve heard great things about Milwaukee.

Hoskins ranked 20th on our Top 50 Free Agents. Ben Clemens estimated that he would receive a three-year contract for a total of $45 million, meaning that Hoskins fell short of the estimate in terms of years, but exceeded it in terms of average annual value. Michael Baumann did a lot of the legwork a couple weeks ago, so I’ll leave it to him to remind you of just how good a hitter Hoskins is:

The value that Hoskins brings is obvious. His power can be streaky on a game-to-game basis — a danger of being a three true outcome-heavy hitter — but in the aggregate, he’s one of the most consistent players in baseball. Hoskins is a career .242/.353/492 hitter, with a 13.5% walk rate and a 23.9% strikeout rate. That’s a career wRC+ of 126.

In four full seasons in the majors (discounting Hoskins’ 50-game rookie season and the 41 games he played in 2020), he’s never been worth more than 2.4 WAR, nor less than 2.0. His full-season career low in wRC+ is 112, while his full-season career high is 128. You can like or dislike the total package, but you know what you’re going to get.

You got that? This Hoskins guy hits the baseball. The Brewers could really use a guy who hits the baseball. The only real surprise about this deal is that it involved the Brewers spending money. It marks the first multi-year contract the team has given since 2021, when they signed Kolten Wong and Jackie Bradley Jr. to two-year deals. (Bradley’s contract was structured like Hoskins’, with one year and an opt-out, whereas Wong’s included a team option for a third year that was not picked up.)

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

A little over a year ago, I wrote about the trade that sent Hunter Renfroe from the Brewers to the Angels. Although it made sense from some angles, it was a rarity in that Milwaukee dealt away its best hitter. Not only did Renfroe’s 124 wRC+ lead the Brewers in 2022, it is the third best season at the plate by a qualified Milwaukee player over the past five years. Christian Yelich ran a 174 wRC+ in 2019, and William Contreras put up his own 124 wRC+ season in 2023. Since 2019, only two teams have had fewer qualified seasons with a wRC+ of 122 or better: the Tigers and the Marlins.

With that in mind, I started pulling up other stats from the past five years. Since 2019, Milwaukee’s 96 wRC+ has ranked 22nd in baseball. Its .406 slugging percentage ranks 21st. Hoskins has a Steamer projection of a 115 wRC+ for 2024, which is 11 points below his career mark. Over the past five years, just 10 Brewers have reached that mark during a season in which they recorded at least 400 plate appearances. Hoskins has hit at least 27 homers in every full season of his career. Only seven Brewers have reached that mark in the last five years.

If we just focus on first base, the upgrade Hoskins provides becomes even clearer. Since 2019, Milwaukee’s first basemen have run a 99 wRC+, 26th in baseball, while their 3.2 WAR (that’s 0.64 WAR per season), rank 23rd. Hoskins has averaged 2.8 WAR per 162 games. He could underperform and still be a real improvement.

There is plenty of reason to worry about a decline. Health is the immediate concern, though it should be reassuring that Hoskins had recovered well enough that the Phillies reportedly considered adding him to their postseason roster. But health just compounds the existing concerns about Hoskins’ defense. He fit perfectly into Philadelphia’s Dadaist interpretation of team defense, which was heavy on lumbering, bat-first sluggers and light on everything else. Still, while he has never shined defensively, it is not as if he’s incapable of playing the position. The big, scary -21.7 Def mark over on his player page came in 2018, when he spent nearly all his time in left field. Although he put up a -15 in 2022, DRS had him as a net positive and DRP had him right around average. Moreover, it’s not as if he could bring the Brewers down much further in that regard.

According to DRS, first basemen cost the Brewers an average of -1.8 runs per year over the past five seasons. For his career, Hoskins has been worth -2.3 per 162 games. OAA sees a slightly higher penalty, dinging Brewers first basemen 1.0 run per season compared to 3.6 for Hoskins. Still, that’s not exactly a big discrepancy. If Hoskins costs the team 2.6 runs on defense, matching his career-worst 112 wRC+ would still constitute a huge overall improvement.

It would be a real problem if Hoskins can’t hack it at first base anymore. However, over the past five years, Milwaukee’s designated hitters have a wRC+ of 83, fourth-worst in baseball. He wouldn’t have to hit much to be a major upgrade there, either.

There’s also the matter of personality. Hoskins is beloved in Philadelphia and was a leader in the clubhouse. It’s clear that his departure is due mainly to the fact that there’s no place to put him, especially with Bryce Harper playing first base. Although at times he was subjected to the wrath of the Philly Faithful, he was a homegrown player who created some thrilling moments, and many Phillies fans are sad to see him go.

This is a chance for Hoskins to make good while staying on a playoff contender, and it gives him one last shot at showing the free agent market that he can play first base, instead of getting relegated to DH. It’s also a move with little downside for the Brewers. They get to bring in a clubhouse guy and fan favorite with playoff experience, while also patching a major hole. Some things just make sense.





Davy Andrews is a Brooklyn-based musician and a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @davyandrewsdavy.bsky.social.

49 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
airforce21oneMember since 2026
2 years ago

“Ben Clemens estimated that he would receive a three-year contract for a total of $45 million, meaning that Hoskins fell short both in terms of years and average annual value.”

45/3 = 15
34/2 = 17

Last edited 2 years ago by airforce21one
keefer
2 years ago
Reply to  airforce21one

That was the first thing that jumped out to me, as well. How can basic arithmetic mistakes like that make it into a Fangraphs post?

David Klein
2 years ago
Reply to  keefer

It is Scott Steiner math.

zstam
2 years ago
Reply to  keefer

They had a posting up for Associate Editor a couple weeks ago. Maybe their editor left before editing this article lol

Ashburn Alley
2 years ago
Reply to  keefer

Oh I see we have someone who has never made a mistake . Good to have you here genius

MichaelMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Ashburn Alley

lol

airforce21oneMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  Ashburn Alley

Platforms that publish writing pieces typically have someone called an “editor”. Do you know what an editor is?

tung_twista
2 years ago
Reply to  airforce21one

If I’m Hoskins (30 year old 1B with career earnings of $26M having missed an entire season of baseball), I would prefer $34M/2 years with an opt out over $45M/3 years, while I expect more people would understandably prefer the latter.

wadz
2 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

The opt out has much more value than the extra 10M guarantee if he plays close to his typical self

airforce21oneMember since 2026
2 years ago

The only real surprise about this deal is that it involved the Brewers spending money. It marks the first multi-year contract the team has given since 2021″

Jackson Chourio signed an 8 year, 82M contract in December.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

Not only did Renfroe’s 124 wRC+ lead the Brewers in 2022, it is the third best season at the plate by a qualified Milwaukee player over the past five years.

That just about sums it up right there! What an absolute mess.

SteveMcAnderson
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

3rd in the NL in wins over those 5 years. 7th in runs

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

The wins are good, although that’s due to a mixture of stellar run prevention and a lousy division.

Spahn_and_Sain
2 years ago

At the same time, they are still 29 runs below average over the last 5 years, so the 7th place ranking is more likely a result of not totally bottoming out than it is a sign of a potent offense (also helps that their worst year for R was the shortened 2020).

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Spahn_and_Sain

wRC+ also paints a very different picture, which indicates at least some of the runs are due to things like park effects.

John WickMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

LOL always so dramatic. Lots of fan bases would take their “absolute mess” over the last five years.

They’re 12th in position player WAR over that time period. As a low budget team with lead contracts that haven’t worked out (Braun, Yelich), they’ve done a pretty fine job finding guys who add value in other ways and building long if unspectacular lineups.

nathanjMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  John Wick
lacslyer
2 years ago
Reply to  John Wick

I agree they’ve done a great job with what they’re given, but I think the point is more that if this is a bottom third of the league payroll how good would they be if they were barely in the top half?

Sure other teams would love this success, but that doesn’t mean fans should be content with that. Because that’s exactly what an owner would want. Content fans who won’t complain about him not spending since they’ve made the playoffs the last few years being helped by a weak division.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  lacslyer

The Brewers are in a tough spot because as far as I can tell, they have the worst TV deal in the majors and there are only a couple of teams that are even close. Teams like the Twins, Tigers, Reds, Rockies, Rays–the lower-middle class of baseball in TV revenue–get about $55M a year. The Royals got $45M. The Brewers got $33M. The Brewers draw well, which helps offset it, but they’re running a payroll about where you would expect a team like them to do–about $120M a year.

They are more committed to putting a winning product on the field than a lot of other teams. But it could be better. If they decided to spend like the Twins over the short-term before all of their cost-controlled stars hit free agency, I think you’d see their offense perform a lot better. Especially in the playoffs. Nobody will care if they spend under $100M in 2025 when Burnes and Adames are playing for other teams. They are only going to have something like $65M tied up in players that are worth caring about in 2025 through guaranteed contracts, player options, arbitration, etc. Less if Hoskins opts out.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

This is exactly the sort of move the Brewers needed.

The Brewers need one more real bat, I think. Hard to know who that is. Unless Cody Bellinger is available on a pillow deal, they’re probably looking at Joc Pederson or Brandon Belt to be a left-handed masher at DH, or Justin Turner to play 1B since Hoskins isn’t good there.

Wouldn’t hurt to get another guy to play 2B or 3B but I think the obvious upgrades there are pretty much all gone, except for Chapman.

airforce21oneMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I like the signing as well, and I believe you said in another piece comment that this would be a good fit. But yeah, I’d say they need even more than one bat. Bellinger isn’t their style and would require a contract that would be difficult to move if/when the Brewers need to blow things up at mid-season. If they aren’t looking good then the best move would be to blow it all up and time the next competitive window around Chourio et al.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  airforce21one

It would only work as a pillow deal, kind of like this one but more expensive. I don’t think it’s likely.

jandys
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

With the surplus in OF, Yelich likely going to play like half of the games at DH and Contreras will DH when he is not behind the plate. I will be very surprised if Brewers sign a big dollar DH.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  jandys

That may be the way the Brewers are thinking about it but they really shouldn’t. No team should let Jake Bauers, Joey Wiemer, and Garrett Mitchell should stand in the way of getting another bat.

FrancoeursteinMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think Garrett Mitchell is a true starting CF. Especially if he’s a true plus with the glove.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

I think they have probably committed to Chourio out there. If other teams share your assessment maybe he could trade bait. But for me? He reminds me a lot of Brett Phillips.

carterMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

While I agree on that, I would say 2 of those 3 guys are not 100% finished products.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  carter

I think Wiemer could still break out. I am more skeptical of Mitchell, who doesn’t seem to have the bat control to take advantage of his power or speed.

jandys
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I would say teams should think exactly like that. Their two best hitters are catcher who needs days off from catching and OF who needs a playing time maintenance because of back issues. Brewers want and should want them in the lineup as often as possible. Expensive full time DH doesnt make much sense.
The potential DH sign is not going to take AB from guys like Turang, Monasterio, Mitchell or Wiemer. Brewers would just shift about 300 AB from Contreras and Yelich to the new DH or sit the DH on the bench. Thats not an efficent move for a team with tight budget.

Last edited 2 years ago by juju
sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  jandys

I would argue that they should be taking PAs from Turang, Monasterio, Mitchell, Wiemer, and Bauer. Somehow. But they probably won’t.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  jandys

I should also add, ideally the Brewers would be adding a top bat at 3B or 2B instead, because I’m pretty skeptical of both Monasterio and Turang hitting. But those players don’t exist in free agency right now, and I’m not really seeing them trade prospect capital for, IDK, Isaac Paredes.

g4Member since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Because those players don’t exist in free agency right now — unless you think Eduardo Escobar has one more resurgence in him — 3B is an upgrade more likely they try to plug midseason, when it costs less in prospect capital. If you view the plan as using the first few months to see which of Turang, Monasterio or Black solidifies their role/health, it makes sense to stand pat for now.

That said, for this “skate by” strategy to work, Jake Bauers has to be worth a damn. And I’m not confident that he is.

Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  g4

For a while last year, it kinda looked like Bauers could be a useful piece — not necessarily a star or even a starter, but a nice slug-first bench piece to mash some righties and won’t kill you if he’s gotta play a couple of weeks due to someone getting hurt.

Then he just stopped. Absolutely dreadful in August.

He’s the kind of guy who can be useful if applied properly.

g4Member since 2020
2 years ago

Yes, I’m not hoping for more than strong side platoon 1B, capable #6 hitter vs RHP

David Klein
2 years ago

Really good signing Hoskins is pretty consistent hitter with a 120ish wRC+ with strong on base and power numbers yes there is some risk with him coming off a serious injury and causing him to miss a year, but it’s worth it. I think it away better signing than Conforto one a year ago with Conforto coming off his second shoulder surgery of his career and going to a tough ballpark to hit in while Hoskins goes to a good one. I thought the Brewers might tear down going into the season and trade Burnes and Adames but they obviously aren’t so good for them I think they’re gonna win the division again.

Richie
2 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

Brewers’ ballpark is at best neutral for hitters. Probably a very slight pitchers’ park.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Richie

It’s funny a few years ago it played really well for left-handed power, and now it seems like it’s neutral. I think that having the universal humidors has flattened a lot of these park effects that we all got used to.

Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  Richie

The three year rolling factor for AmFam on Statcast is an overall 97, so that tracks. What suprises me is how close it is in profile to Yankee Stadium; it doesn’t have the same level of HRs, but drops a bunch more 3Bs, and otherwise is damn near close to identical.

bdcb58Member since 2019
2 years ago

AmFam was at 109 for RHH HR. HR & BB are Hoskins’ specialties.

bdcb58Member since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  Richie

That’s true for overall offense but not the case for HR. Across the past three years, American Family Field’s Statcast RHH HR Park Factor score was 109. CBP in Phila had a 111. Fenway was average at 100. CBP was better for RHH doubles (105, 89).

tdouglas
2 years ago

Boy, I wouldn’t want to bet on any team in the NLC right now. By the end of the offseason, we could see three teams with identical projections, one team with slightly lower projections, and a wild card team that’s not far behind the rest. This feels like the time for a team like STL to use their prospects and acquire a guy like Cease to put them over the top, but that front office has been content to play for 85-90 wins for over a decade now.

Lanidrac
2 years ago
Reply to  tdouglas

The Cardinals generally play for 90-95 wins. It’s just that they haven’t been able to get quite that far (for their 2024 expectations) within their budget this offseason when needing to rebuild half the pitching staff.

Last edited 2 years ago by Lanidrac
tdouglas
2 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

Nah, I disagree with that. Teams who consistently aim for 90-95 wins are those teams that spend/trade aggressively to improve their teams to be championship-caliber. The recent Mets fit that bill, though they collapsed. The Dodgers and Braves are consistently in that 90-95 win projected range. STL is usually projected for a win total that starts with an 8, not a 9.

It’s difficult to easily find past projections, but I found projected win totals of 86, 84, 76, 88, and 91 wins from 2019 to 2023 (2020’s extrapolated from projected win percentage).

Lanidrac
2 years ago
Reply to  tdouglas

I’m not talking about projections but expectations of the actual results. For various reasons, the projected win totals are flattened on both ends compared to what actually ends up happening each season. In comparison, the Dodgers and Braves have been building expected 100+ win teams in recent years, which they have then followed through on obtaining. The Padres and Mets tried to go for something like 95+ wins last season, but they both failed miserably.

90 wins is usually good enough to get into the playoffs, so shooting for a little above that without sacrificing the future is generally what the Cardinals do. In the 23 full seasons (not counting 2020) since 2000, the Cardinals have won 90-95 games 8 times, over 95 wins 5 times, and under 90 wins 10 times. So maybe it’s more accurate to say they shoot for 88-95 wins, but I wasn’t far off.

Last edited 2 years ago by Lanidrac
Jeremy FoxMember since 2017
2 years ago

Hoskins to the Brewers, just like seemingly every commenter argued for on the “let’s find a home for Rhys Hoskins” post. We should all be GMs! 🙂

g4Member since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Jeremy Fox

It was by far the best free agent move the Brewers could make at this time with their (presumed) budget limit. Being super weak at both 1B and DH really mitigates Hoskins’ defensive risk. Any while cheaper options like Turner, Santana, and G. Cooper may have helped (and still could), none of them hit homers like Hoskins, and that’s the team’s most glaring deficiency.

Small bonus, you keep him from joining the rival Cubs, his next most obvious suitor.

jbeerj
2 years ago

“whereas Wong’s included a team option for a third year that was not picked up.”
Wong’s option was picked up, that’s how they flipped him for Winker.

bdcb58Member since 2019
2 years ago

Hoskins’ wRC+ from 2021-’22 while at 1B versus MLB & MIL 1B in 2023.
After Contreras & Yelich’s 2023 wRC+ of 124 & 122, the next best was Adames’ 94.
Hitter …….. wRC+
Hoskins …… 121
MLB 1B …… 111
MIL 1B ……… 81 ….. ranked 28th