Trevor Bauer Might Have Conducted an Experiment

CLEVELAND — In case you’ve not been logged into your social-media account in the past several days, Indians pitcher Trevor Bauer has been outspoken about rampant use of pine tar (and other grip-aiding substances) in the game.

Bauer’s position is basically that the playing field ought to be level: either MLB better enforces the pine-tar rule or it makes grip-aiding substances legal. And Bauer knows it would be about impossible to enforce the current rule. Bauer says he has tested pine tar in a lab setting and said it significantly increased his spin rate. He claims it has a greater effect than steroids on performance.

“I’ve melted down Firm Grip and Coca-Cola and pine tar together,” Bauer told reporters Wednesday. “I’ve tested a lot of stuff. At 70 mph, when we were doing the tests, spin rates jumped between 300–400 rpm while using various different sticky substances. The effect is slightly less pronounced at higher velocities — more game-like velocities — but still between 200–300 rpm increase.”

As many in this audience are aware, the greater the fastball spin rate, the more “rise” effect the pitch has, the more it resists gravity, the more swing-and-miss it generates. More spin equals more swing-and-miss. That’s been proven by Driveline Baseball, where Bauer trains, and FanGraphs’ own Jeff Zimmerman.

There is incentive to add spin. And now with Statcast and its TrackMan Doppler radar component in all major-league stadiums, pitchers have had the ability to measure their spin to better understand some of the underpinnings behind their performance in game environments.

But spin is thought to be largely innate, a difficult skill to enhance. Generally, the more velocity a pitcher has, the more spin a pitcher is capable of producing. There is a relationship between spin and velocity, so if you can increase your velocity, you might be able to increase your spin rate. Spin declines with age like velocity, though not quite as sharply. An easier way to create spin is thought to be in doctoring the ball. Pine tar and other substances can improve grip, which is believed to increase spin rate, but there is little enforcement of the rule unless it is blatantly departed from. And to be fair, it seems like a rule difficult to enforce even if MLB wanted to. Would pitchers’ hands be swabbed after every inning?

At least one member of the Astros did not appreciate some implications made by Bauer. While the Astros lead baseball in four-seam fastball spin rate, it’s difficult to attribute that to any one cause. For example, a pitcher like Charlie Morton has dramatically increased his velocity, which should come with a spin-rate change. Some Astros pitchers have gained spin in Houston, but not all, as Eno Sarris found at The Athletic. Eno concluded that this is a difficult thing to study, and it is, as we are working with incomplete information. For instance, automated pitch-labeling is hardly perfect.

After making his comments Tuesday, Bauer met with reporters prior to Wednesday’s game to answer questions and provide further comment:

“There is a problem in baseball right now that has to do with sticky substances and spin rates,” Bauer told reporters. “We might not have had the technology before to measure how sticky stuff affects the ball, how it spins, how it moves. But, all that research is clear now. We know how it affects spin rate and we know how spin rate affects outcomes and pitches and movements that have a big difference in a game, a season and each individual player’s career.

“And it’s my opinion that it is the same argument that was used when steroids were going on in the game. If you just look the other way and you let some people do it, the people who chose not to do it are at a competitive disadvantage. And that’s what’s going on right now.”

Interestingly, Eno notes in his post that Bauer’s spin rate was up early in his Monday start. Bauer had noted earlier on Twitter that he had increased his spin rate by about 300 rpms in a lab setting using pine tar. Bauer’s spin is typically around 2,250 rpms, just about league average.

That’s relevant because, during Bauer’s start on Monday, his four-seam spin rate sat at 2,579 rpms in the first inning — that is, roughly 300 rpms higher than usual. That figure settled back into the upper 2,200s and lower 2,300s for the rest of the contest.

Was Bauer making a point? Did he use pine tar early Monday? “No comment” is his official response:

If — and I’m definitely saying if — that’s what Bauer did, he might prove in a game setting that a pine-tar-like substance is really a significant rpm-enhancer.

What is not clear is if it’s the only way to increase spin rate. We know there is a relationship with velocity, but can certain pitchers improve spin without velocity increases? One would need a more complete understanding of pitching physics than this author to answer that question responsibly. We’re early in the Statcast era; there’s still much to learn about the science of pitching. Maybe some players or teams have found ways to legally improve spin. We have to be careful in attaching labels. We also should not be so naive to think players and teams will not look for edges where they can. If MLB wants pine tar to be illegal, baseball should probably better try and enforce the rule — or just legalize it. Unfair advantages ought to be eliminated as much as possible.

Regardless of whether a lot of players are doctoring the ball — Buster Olney investigated the issue — I wondered this: are a lot of pitchers changing their spin, which is thought to be difficult to do?

If this is a widespread thing, Statcast should offer some data, some clues.

I asked for Zimmerman’s help. He examined the individual four-seam-spin gainers and losers from 2015 to 2018, and 2017 to 2018.

Among pitchers to have thrown at least 50 four-seamers in 2015 and this season, there were only 15 pitchers to increase their rpms by 195 or more, and some of those pitchers had velocity bumps — like Morton — when you would expect to increase to some degree. However, others had no gain or even velocity losses.

Top Fastball Spin Increasers 2015-18
Rank Name 2015 Velo 2015 Spin 2018 Velo 2018 Spin Velo Change Spin Change
1 James Paxton 94 2009 95 2350 1 341
2 Jaime Garcia 90 2030 89 2313 -1 283
3 Jorge De La Rosa 91 1808 93 2064 1 256
4 Scott Oberg 95 2007 95 2260 0 252
5 Aroldis Chapman 99 2280 98 2520 -1 240
6 Shawn Kelley 92 2104 92 2336 0 232
7 Robbie Erlin 90 2033 90 2261 0 229
8 Carl Edwards Jr. 93 2451 94 2673 1 221
9 Charlie Morton 92 2039 96 2259 4 221
10 Hector Neris 93 2315 94 2523 1 208
11 Aaron Nola 91 1944 92 2151 2 208
12 Felix Hernandez 92 1920 89 2126 -2 206
13 Rich Hill 90 2318 89 2523 -1 205
14 Gerrit Cole 96 2130 96 2332 0 202
15 Clayton Kershaw 94 2173 91 2372 -2 198
SOURCE: Statcast

As for the 2017 to 2018, the following are the top changers:

Top Fastball Spin Increasers 2017-18
Rank Name 2017 Velo 2017 Spin 2018 Velo 2018 Spin Velo Change Spin Change
1 Tyler Glasnow 94 2214 96 2464 1 250
2 Drew VerHagen 94 2179 94 2412 0 233
3 Jorge De La Rosa 93 1879 93 2064 -1 185
4 Junior Guerra 92 2132 93 2307 0 175
5 Gerrit Cole 96 2165 96 2332 0 167
6 Artie Lewicki 92 2143 93 2308 0 165
7 Chad Bell 93 2118 93 2279 0 160
8 Michael Fulmer 96 2096 95 2253 -1 157
9 Edgar Santana 95 2236 94 2369 -1 133
10 Ben Lively 91 1920 91 2052 0 132
11 Wei-Yin Chen 91 2039 91 2156 0 117
12 Wade Davis 94 2321 94 2436 0 116
13 Mike Montgomery 92 1832 92 1947 -1 114
14 Jared Hughes 93 2050 92 2163 -1 113
15 Zach McAllister 95 2182 95 2291 -1 109

For comparison, here are the top 2015-18 decliners:

Top Fastball Spin Decliners 2015-18
Rank Player 2015 Velo 2015 Spin 2018 Velo 2018 Spin Spin change Velo change
1 Matt Harvey 96 2321 93 2123 -198 -3
2 John Axford 96 2107 95 1946 -161 -1
3 Drew Pomeranz 92 2422 88 2270 -153 -3
4 Josh Tomlin 89 2371 87 2218 -153 -2
5 Drew Hutchison 92 2292 90 2149 -143 -2
6 Sam Tuivailala 96 2296 93 2163 -133 -4
7 Buck Farmer 93 2323 94 2225 -99 1
8 Jeremy Hellickson 90 2107 89 2010 -97 -1
9 Mike Wright 93 2214 91 2121 -94 -2
10 Kevin Quackenbush 91 2116 90 2028 -88 -1
11 Oliver Drake 91 2210 93 2132 -79 2
12 Matt Moore 92 2320 92 2244 -77 -0
13 Nick Goody 91 2249 91 2174 -75 -0
14 Chad Bettis 92 1945 90 1876 -68 -2
15 Josh Fields 94 2266 94 2204 -62 -1
16 Kevin Gausman 95 2283 93 2234 -48 -3
17 Matt Wisler 93 2158 92 2111 -47 -1
18 Jose Quintana 91 2066 91 2020 -47 -0
19 Masahiro Tanaka 92 2176 92 2129 -46 -0
20 Clayton Richard 92 2226 91 2183 -43 -1

A lot of the rpm losers also have accompanying velocity losses. You don’t want to be on that above list as a pitcher.

Is there any sense of a widespread problem? I’m unsure myself. One could argue that baseball has been unfair to pitchers with the ball and seemingly constant changes to its seams and properties according to research by Rob Arthur. Bauer noted batters might be OK with pine tar if it means better control.

There is an argument to be made that baseball should better enforce the rules (though that’s easier said than done) or allow pitchers the option of gaining a better grip. At the end of the day, most everyone wants a level playing field regardless of what the playing field looks like.





A Cleveland native, FanGraphs writer Travis Sawchik is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Big Data Baseball. He also contributes to The Athletic Cleveland, and has written for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, among other outlets. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Sawchik.

43 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gavinmember
5 years ago

It would be interesting to go watch the game film and pay attention to Bauer in the first inning for evidence of… experimentation.

420Smash
5 years ago
Reply to  Gavin

Forget Bauer, Clayton Kershaw must have bought himself a pine tar factory. Huge drop in velo, big increase in spin rate.