Trusting Blue Jays Closer Roberto Osuna
In this year’s postseason, relievers have received attention based on when (or if) they have entered the game. For the Toronto Blue Jays and closer Roberto Osuna, there were questions a week ago whether Osuna would be able to pitch at all in the postseason after being removed from the Wild Card victory over the Baltimore Orioles with a shoulder issue. Osuna pitched to four batters in that game, retiring them all and striking out two, but his availability for the recently completed Division Series against the Texas Rangers was in some doubt. Osuna has laid those doubts, as well as those that accompanied a less-than-stellar end-of-season run, to rest.
If you were to hazard a guess at which Blue Jays player was most important in this year’s playoffs — at least in terms of increasing the probability of winning games — you probably would not guess Roberto Osuna. You would also be right not to guess Osuna, as Josh Donaldson’s nine hits and a walk in 19 postseason plate appearances led to a team-leading .635 WPA over the Jays’ four postseason games. Osuna, however, is second on the team WPA leaderboard, despite pitching in only three of the four games and recording just five total innings.
Player | WPA |
Josh Donaldson | .635 |
Roberto Osuna | .462 |
Edwin Encarnacion | .442 |
Ezequiel Carrera | .242 |
Marco Estrada | .216 |
Jason Grilli | .178 |
Troy Tulowitzki | .152 |
J.A. Happ | .122 |
Osuna, despite his shoulder issue, has now appeared in three of the four Blue Jays playoffs games (having not been needed in the Game 1 rout of the Rangers). In this year of the non-traditional closer use in the postseason, Osuna has yet to come in at the start of the ninth in a save situation. Every single appearance has been incredibly important — and has often coincided with the most important moments of each game, by leverage index.
Game Situation | Runners/Outs | IP | First Batter LI | Highest LI in Game | |
WC Game | T9 (tied) | 0/0 | 1.1 | 2.32 | 2.32 |
Game 2 ALDS | B8 (up 5-3) | 2/1 | 1.2 | 2.73 | 3.30* |
Game 3 ALDS | T9 (tied) | 0/0 | 2.0 | 2.32 | 2.74 |
In the playoffs this year, Blue Jays pitchers have faced 15 batters at a point in the game when the leverage index had reached 2.0 or greater. Osuna has recorded eight of those high-leverage plate appearances — more than J.A. Happ (who had four in his start), Francisco Liriano (one), or Joe Biagini (two, one of which was a run-scoring double by Mitch Moreland in Game 2).
That Osuna has pitched well in the playoffs isn’t in doubt. In five innings, he’s faced 16 batters and struck out six, giving up only one hit, a leadoff double to Adrian Beltre in the ninth inning of Game 2 against the Rangers. Whether Osuna would be able to pitch at all was in considerable doubt over the past week — and the final few weeks of the regular season added to those concerns.
On September 21, Osuna struck out all four batters he faced in the ninth and 10th innings of a 12-inning game against the Seattle Mariners — a game that Toronto would ultimately lose. Osuna’s WAR stood at an even 2.0 at that point. He’d recorded a 3.00 FIP (69 FIP-), a 2.42 ERA (57 ERA-), and had struck out 31.3% of batters while walking just 5% of them. Over the last six games of the season, however, Osuna faced 29 batters and fanned just one. He also only gave up just one walk and four of the six outings were scoreless, perhaps masking some of Osuna’s issues. Alternatively, there might have been no issues at all. This poor run of form might have been just a random blip in a long season.
Osuna, just 21 years old, has already pitched significantly more innings in the majors (157 IP, including postseason) than he did for the Blue Jays in the minors (89.1 IP), and the possibility that Osuna was wearing down as the season progressed is a real one. Here is Osuna’s cumulative WAR on the season, which began to stagnate even before September 21:
While a few poor outings can hurt relievers given their smaller sample of innings, WAR is a product of fielding-independent numbers, not mere runs allowed — and the cause of Osuna’s decreasing WAR appears to be the product of a similar decrease in strikeouts. Here is Osuna’s 10-game rolling K/9 this season.
Osuna’s velocity held through September, continuing to sit at about 97 mph on the fastball, though a couple outings did produce figures below that average, per Brooks Baseball. What did happen in September is that Osuna’s slider stopped getting whiffs, dropping from 30% over the first five months of the season to just 11% over the final month, leading to a corresponding drop in strikeouts. Osuna did some experimenting as the season went on, speeding up and slowing down his delivery. He also greatly increased his sinker usage.
Through September 1, Osuna had thrown 27 sinkers on the season; he threw another 27 in the season’s final month alone. That heavier sinker usage has continued through the postseason, sprinkled in among his normal four-seam fastball and his usually deadly slider. Whether sinker use has had any great effect is tough to tell, but we do know that his slider is getting the production it got for most of the season and that his average fastball velocity is higher now than it was during the regular season.
While it would be irresponsible to read too much into five playoff innings, it should be comforting to see that those five playoff innings are much closer to the Osuna that we saw in the regular season. The slider is working. The velocity is there. While the sinker is an interesting dimension with unclear results, that Osuna’s results and velocity match up with the good part of Osuna’s season is a real positive. The other positive for Blue Jays fans is that the sweep just bought the team and Osuna a bit more rest. Osuna might have been taxed as the regular season drew to a close, highlighted by less-than-stellar strikeout numbers and a shoulder concern in the Wild Card game. Osuna has rebounded in the division series and, with more time, it appears safe to trust Osuna in big moments at the end of games.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
The increased use of the sinker is even more exciting as it really shows how deep an arsenal Osuna has – He has all of FB, SK, CT, SL, and CH now, with command. And as you mentioned he regularly uses different hesitation and quick pitch deliveries.
Osuna has already accumulated more fWAR amd ra9WAR than any 21yr old pure reliever in MLB history from what I can find. It would be a shame if the Jays didn’t move him into a starting role eventually.
But it won’t be next season. Two seasons from now? It will be interesting to see what the Jays do then.
2017 Jays Rotation:
Sanchez
Estrada
Happ
Stroman
Liriano
I wouldn’t be opposed to him starting the season in extended Spring Training, and then in May slowly working his way into the Buffalo rotation. It is highly unlikely that the Jays would make it through the entire season with that rotation, and there aren’t any other Major League ready options in the Minors for next year. This way, the Jays would have another starter in case of injury, but he wouldn’t need to be shut down in August. And if somehow the Jays make it through the entire season without an injury or underperformance in the rotation, Osuna can join the bullpen for the stretch run and quite possibly the playoffs if the rotation is doing that well again. And then he should be ready for a near full load of innings in 2018 when Liriano and Estrada are FA.
I’d hate to waste his limited innings in AAA.
This will certainly be interesting. Osuna did also indicate himself that he envisions that he would be in the bullpen for 2017, but that he would let the organization decide what is best for him. Given the choice between closing and starting, he would rather close. So, unless the Jays go out and get a proven closer that would not be controversial to supplant Osuna, you guys are on the money that it won’t happen until 2018.
https://sports.vice.com/ca/article/roberto-osuna-doesnt-want-to-be-a-starting-pitcher
I’d like to sell high on Happ, trade for a bat, and let Osuna be the #5 SP. Given what SP are making in FA you could probably get a pretty good bat in return for 2 years of a SP making 13M but pitching far better value than that.
I don’t agree with trading Happ. We have quite a few exciting young pitching prospects, and 5 guys named blank at Buffalo. It looks like the plan is to hope one of the prospects is ready 2018, and 1 2019, when Estrada and Happ are leaving. If the Jays are to remain competitive in the interum, they will need an arm as good as Happ’s, and at his price he’s near impossible to replace. Happ should be good for near 200 innings next year. No chance of that for Osuna, so we would need another SP. If we trade Happ, it would have to involve getting MLB ready pitching back also.
But it’s not just Estrada, it’s also Liriano who is a FA after 2017. So you need 2 spots to fill. So you could have Sanchez/Stro/Osuna for 2018 and beyond or you can have Sanchez/Stro/Happ, with Happ a potential FA at the end of the year.
The Jays are deeper at SP for a longer period of time if Happ is traded and Osuna is a SP as early as next year. I think Happ is the most likely guy to regress on the Jays staff, so this is probably the best time to flip him.
Osuna wouldn’t need to go 200 innings, especially with the front 4 guys in the rotation.
I think Biagini is the next in-house option for the rotation – He can be the starter in waiting in Buffalo after his rule-5 year. The likelihood of basically not needing a 6th starter again next year is low, and Biagini definitely has potential.