Tulowitzki’s SwStr% vs. Fastballs and Sliders

Dave Cameron wrote on Monday about Troy Tulowitzki and his case for the NL MVP award against Joey Votto. I thought I’d take a look at how pitchers in the rest of the NL West, particularly the Giants, could cool down Tulo’s recent hot streak, especially when the two teams face off this weekend.

I will only look at fastballs and sliders instead of all major pitch types, due to small sample size. I contemplated taking all of Tulo’s pitches since 2007, but Tulowitzki was a much different hitter in 2008 (.263/.332/.401) than he is now in 2008 (.325/.390/.588).

First up, let’s look at where pitchers get Tulowitzki to swing and miss on fastballs, whether the pitcher is right-handed or left-handed (pitches from 2009-2010, 1353 fastballs from RHP, 505 fastballs from LHP):

The red circular regions are what I call 50% swing zones and represent a concept I borrowed from Jeremy Greenhouse. Essentially, Tulowitzki swings at over 50% of all fastballs thrown inside the swing zone. The heat maps in this example are of swinging strike percentages (SwStr%), which is swinging strikes per pitch (as opposed to swinging strikes per swing, which I term Whiff%). Nothing too terribly surprising here, as Tulo, like most hitters, swings and misses the most when a high fastball comes. Tulo’s swing zone from RHP fastballs is larger than the one from LHP fastballs though, and it seems right-handed pitchers should occasionally throw the high and inside fastball. Let’s look at Tulowitzki against sliders (pitches from 2009-2010, 600 sliders from RHP, 159 sliders from LHP):

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Here, you see smaller swing zones from Tulo, meaning he is less likely to swing at a slider than he is at a fastball. But when he does swing, the probability of a swinging strike is higher, especially on low and away sliders from RHP or low and inside sliders from LHP. If you look at the position of the swing zones relative to SwStr% hot spots, it would seem to me that Tulo chases low and inside LHP sliders more than he does low and outside sliders from RHP. In either case, Giants pitchers should look to throw timely low sliders going toward the pitcher’s glove side.

However, for the most part, Tulowitzki is very patient at the plate, only swinging the bat 43.4% of the time this season (recall from yesterday’s post that Vladimir Guerrero swings at 60.7% of all pitches). His patience seems to pay off in terms of limiting swinging strikes, as he whiffs on only 6.2% of pitches. As a comparison with other NL MVP candidates, Joey Votto whiffed on 10.3% of pitches this season while Ryan Zimmerman whiffed on 7.3% of them. If the Giants want to shut down Tulowitzki this weekend, looking to induce swinging strikes would be one possibility, but I believe it would be better to approach Tulo by avoiding solid contact.





Albert Lyu (@thinkbluecrew, LinkedIn) is a graduate student at the Georgia Institute of Technology, but will always root for his beloved Northwestern Wildcats. Feel free to email him with any comments or suggestions.

19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Tom B
15 years ago

I’m gonna go with the obvious answer… because he doesn’t lead the NL in a single statistic? He basically ranks behind Votto in every measurable way.

Maybe if he (or the rockies for that matter) showed up and did this for the entire season, it wouldn’t even be a question…

Sky
15 years ago
Reply to  Tom B

Every measurable *offensive* way, maybe.

Tom B
15 years ago
Reply to  Sky

i doubt the writers take defense into consideration at all unless they are trying to over-hype a catcher.

Travis L
15 years ago
Reply to  Tom B

Positional adjustment.

adohaj
15 years ago

1. He doesn’t have 100 runs or 100 rbi
2. The so called Coors effect

Travis L
15 years ago
Reply to  adohaj

Why did you refer to it as “so called”? There is an effect; it is measurable; we do know what it is.

Trebecois
15 years ago
Reply to  adohaj

how many SS are there with even his road numbers?

Patrick M
15 years ago
Reply to  Trebecois

His road wOBA is .400 which is better than the season marks for Cano, Beltre, Ryan Zimmerman, Adrian Gonzalez, and Prince Fielder. In short, the answer is no. He is one of the best players in the game, regardless of position, and regardless of his home stadium.

David G
15 years ago

An editor could improve this site greatly.

James
15 years ago
Reply to  David G

I think people need to chill out on the editing expectations… It’s not like errors on this site are different from other raw technical/research documents…

In many cases, the errors are obvious and don’t require correction for comprehension. In any event, I think the comments regarding them add nothing. Personally, I am content with a free site with frequent postings, limited advertising, and occassional errors. Isn’t this all primarily a diversion anyway?

fredsbank
15 years ago

you made a typo, i believe you said ryan zimmerman was an mvp candidate?

Jim Lahey
15 years ago

Because he got hurt earlier in the year… and didn’t help the Rockies win last night despite batting first in the 9th inning down 3-1… if only he could have hit a 3r HR..

(i want to see him win MVP)

Travis L
15 years ago
Reply to  Jim Lahey

are you drunk again lahey?

The Duder
15 years ago

Albert,

Is the 50% swing zone incorrect for RHP sliders? Why doesn’t it surround the high swing area? Great stuff overall though. Really enjoying these.

The Duder
15 years ago
Reply to  Albert Lyu

Righhhht, of course. Sorry. He doesn’t chase often, but when he does he’s usually whiffing.

Scott B
15 years ago

“Here, you see smaller swing zones from Tulo, meaning he is less likely to swing at a slider than he is at a fastball.”

Just because the area is smaller in the heat map does not mean that he is less likely to swing- there could have been a higher concentration of pitches thrown in that location.

John
15 years ago

“Just because the area is smaller in the heat map does not mean that he is less likely to swing- there could have been a higher concentration of pitches thrown in that location.”

By definition, if the area in which Tulo pulls the trigger on sliders 50% of the time is smaller than the area in which he does the same for fastballs, it would suggest that he’s more selective with the former.