Waiver Deal Candidates

With all the ballyhoo encompassing the July 31 non-waiver trade deadline, it’s sometimes easy to forget that deals can still go down for another month.

Plenty of viable players clear waivers every year, and a fair number of them are dealt to bolster a team’s playoff chances or perhaps to clear some payroll off the books. One of the more notable deals was the Padres’ 1998 blunder in which the club claimed reliever Randy Myers to prevent him from getting to the Atlanta Braves. The Blue Jays gladly allowed the waiver claim to go through, and Myers’ bloated salary was absorbed by the Friars.

Let’s take a peek at a few players who could find themselves on different rosters in the next month.

Ramon Hernandez – Catcher – Cincinnati Reds

Dusty Baker loves veterans. But after all, you’re reading FanGraphs, so you already know that. However, the exact rationale behind not dealing Hernandez and promoting Devin Mesoraco was that ol’ Fistbands didn’t want to have a rookie catcher in the heat of a pennant race. Well, with the club in fourth place and seven-and-a-half games back, it’s hard to really jive with that sentiment. Hernandez doesn’t profile as a player who can play every day in the twilight of his career, but that doesn’t mean it will stop Brian Sabean from trying to pry him away down the stretch in a desperate attempt to bolster his club’s futile offense. Hernandez, whose .364 wOBA is the finest of his career, was and still is a fine sell-high candidate, and perhaps with the race slipping away, GM Walt Jocketty will still get value with the “Free Mesoraco” campaign gaining some steam.

Carl Pavano – Starting Pitcher – Minnesota Twins

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The Twins have yet to indicate the Pavano is on the block, but there’s little reason he shouldn’t be. With the club seven games out and treading water in the league’s worst division, it is a bit surprising the Twins opted to stand pat rather than move toward one of the poles. Should the division lead lengthen any further, however, it’s not unreasonable to expect GM Bill Smith to start fielding calls for the suddenly-durable right hander. Pavano’s been roughed up a bit of late, but is still on pace to throw in the neighborhood of 200 innings for the third straight season. His xFIP of 4.15 also serves notice to the defensive struggles the Twins have uncharacteristically suffered from in 2011, but also helps contextualize some of the mistakes made in the club’s offseason planning (dealing Hardy, re-signing Pavano rather than trying to receive compensation picks). If the Twins eat money, it’s not completely out of the question that he could find himself in the same situation as 2009, when he moved from Cleveland to Minnesota for the stretch run.

Wandy Rodriguez – Starting Pitcher – Houston Astros

The biggest reason Rodriguez could wind up on the block is his contract, which just kicked in for the 2011 season. Rodriguez, likely the best pitcher that the average fan hasn’t heard about, has been scintillating for the Astros for the past four seasons, compiling a 3.38 ERA, 8.3 K/9, and a solid 2.9 K/BB. Those numbers landed Rodriguez a three-year extension with a 2014 option, with the big money kicking in next season at $10 million. Rodriguez would probably slip through waivers because the fourth year option is guaranteed with a trade, and Wandy would be 35 at the top of the 2014 season. Still, for a team with cash to burn and a rotation need (Yankees/Red Sox?), Rodriguez could be a viable fit that would slot in nicely in the upper-middle of just about any rotation. The Astros have almost no incentive to hold onto Rodriguez after dealing Hunter Pence and Michael Bourn, but have no reason to give him away either. If a deal gets done, it’ll only be because Ed Wade hears an offer to his liking. Whatever that means.





In addition to Rotographs, Warne writes about the Minnesota Twins for The Athletic and is a sportswriter for Sportradar U.S. in downtown Minneapolis. Follow him on Twitter @Brandon_Warne, or feel free to email him to do podcasts or for any old reason at brandon.r.warne@gmail-dot-com

33 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
SC2GG
15 years ago

E5 might not be long for the Blue Jays world. The OF will soon be Snider/Rasmus/Bautista, 3B will be Lawrie and DH will be E5/Thames?

The Jays will either send Thames or Snider back down, which they don’t want to do, or leave E5 on the bench, which is also not good considering his production lately, or maybe don’t call up Lawrie until the rosters expand, which is another unfortunate decision.

Solution: DFA Teahran, platoon 2 of 3.

BeasleyRockah
15 years ago
Reply to  SC2GG

Even with his recent hot streak E5 isn’t good at baseball. Having him as a part time player for the last two months on a non contending team is no crime against humanity.

Chops
15 years ago
Reply to  SC2GG

Regardless, it sets them up nice to dump E5 in the offseason and sign a full-time 1B/DH.

CircleChange11
15 years ago
Reply to  Chops

I’m very interested to see how AA/TOR fare once they start signing FA and trying to build a rotation and bullpen. It should be very interesting. I’m trying to go into the off-season without a bunch of expectations or preconceived notions, and just watch what happens.

IvanGrushenko
15 years ago

Not saying Pavano won’t be traded or that he isn’t above replacement level, but isn’t a 4.15 xFIP below average? I thought starter ERAs were around 3.96 in 2011, no?

Barkey Walker
15 years ago
Reply to  IvanGrushenko

ERA is 4.9 in 2011. I don’t get saying signing him for $7.2/year in was a mistake. He has 1.6 WAR to date and that pays the $7.2 million right.

The twins made the ALDS in 2010 without Morneau in the second half and thought they had their three top players coming back with their tanks filled up (Mauer, Nathan, and Morneau).

WAR also undervalues an inning eater–they save you from needing more relief pitchers which pushed up against the 25 man roster limit. WAR never really deals with how you might want to think about playing time tradeoffs (i.e. the cost of having an old pro who can PH very well on a NL team but can’t field probably is more than their WAR suggests).

Brandon Warne
15 years ago
Reply to  Barkey Walker

From a WAR standpoint, signing him was a mistake. From a “it cost the team from being able to keep Hardy, address the middle infield, and pocket a draft pick (or picks)” standpoint….well….

Yirmiyahu
15 years ago
Reply to  IvanGrushenko

It’s actually his FIP that is 4.15.

But that’s probably giving him too much credit. His xFIP is 4.29, his SIERA is 4.46, and his tERA is 4.40.

Anyway. What’s wrong with below average? Many teams would love to add a below average starter.

Brandon Warne
15 years ago
Reply to  Yirmiyahu

Actually true. Innings-eaters have a ton of value on the free agent market, and even in the trade market.

Jason B
15 years ago
Reply to  Yirmiyahu

“What’s wrong with below average? Many teams would love to add a below average starter.”

Unless you’re the Yanks or BoSox (etc) and can spend your way around pricey mistakes, that kind of thinking is a ticket to 4th-place finishes and 73-win seasons as far as the eye can see…I mean, I get your point, kinda, but yuck. No one should get excited about adding filler material, or be in a rush to throw money at it.

Orioles' Brain Trust
15 years ago
Reply to  Yirmiyahu

Yeah, but what’s the big problem with 4th place finishes and 73-win seasons?? We’ll gladly take a piece of that action…

hunterfan
15 years ago

Re: Wandy Rodriguez…I thought he was a good pitcher as well, and signed to a fair market deal (albeit not a bargain.) Yet supposedly the best offer the Astros got was from the Yankees, who demanded the Astros pay 1/3 of his salary….why?

Rudegar
15 years ago
Reply to  hunterfan

Why? Because the same moron sent cash with Oswalt, Pence, and Bourn?

Brandon Warne
15 years ago
Reply to  Rudegar

Says it better than I could.

hatter
15 years ago

dont u guys hate how teams can still acquire a player after the trade deadline in a push for the playoffs… the angels sure need a player or two.

Esteban
15 years ago

The worst part of Wandys deal Is the 4th year option that becomes a player option upon being traded. But a waiver claim won’t activate the switch of the option so really it’s a 2/21 deal instead of a 3/35 deal worst case if someone claims him.

Brandon Warne
15 years ago
Reply to  Esteban

I don’t think Houston’s letting him go on a straight waiver claim.

SouthPawRyno
15 years ago

Pavano sounds like a decent option for Arizona. He’s certainly better than the current back-end of the rotation (Collmenter/Owings), and has more experience compared to those two

Brandon Warne
15 years ago
Reply to  SouthPawRyno

I would tend to agree, and think one or perhaps a combination of two B/C prospects could get it done. Especially if it was a player up the middle.

Sophist
15 years ago

any chance someone would claim Rios again? Kenny Williams could throw in Dunn.

Steve
15 years ago
Reply to  Sophist

Unfortunately, the only GM that would claim Rios again is Kenny Williams.

hatter
15 years ago

why isnt KURODA on this list? anyone know?

carlos pena? haha

Dann M
15 years ago
Reply to  hatter

Kuroda is on the record saying he won’t accept a trade, period. And a trade after the deadline is still a trade. Now, if the Dodgers inexplicably wished to expose him to waivers just to see if someone would take him, then he could be moved on a waiver claim. But his no-trade clause is still in effect even after he passes waivers.

As far as Pena is concerned, he is the one piece that it sort-of makes sense for Hendry to keep around. Unlike Byrd, Johnson, Baker, Ramirez, Soto, Marmol, etc., there is no clear replacement down on the farm or on the roster now to take over 1B. Bryan LaHair is murdering AAA pitching, but he’s 28 and not really a viable option unless someone gets hurt and they need an emergency fill-in. They are splitting Vitters between 3B and 1B this year, so the 21-year-old has-been at Double A might have a future at first base, but he’s still a year or two away regardless, while Ridling isn’t really an MLB prospect, and Bour’s solid A-ball numbers haven’t been reflected in prospect respect. And that brings us to the elephant in the room: Pujols and Fielder. If the Cubs aren’t able to sign either this off-season, Pena for another year or two is a safe, cost-conscious expense for a proven MLB middle of the order hitter. Pena won’t be the centerpiece of a pennant contender in his career, but filling in kids around him (Welington Castillo behind the plate, Barney and Castro up the middle, Flaherty eventually easing Ramirez off of 3B, and some combo of Jackson, Campana and Colvin earning one or more of the OF spots) makes for a slightly more watchable rebuilding process than just throwing a LaHair/Untouchable Baker platoon out there for 650 PA in 2012.

Pena won’t be a type B, even, so what he’d bring back in trade is nothing given the lack of demand among contenders. Giants are stuck with Belt/Huff; ATL has Freeman; Philly has Howard; Prince, Votto, Albert and D. Lee in the Central; in the AL, Papi/Gonzo, Teixeira/Posada, Cabrera/VMart, Moreland/Young, Trumbo/Abreu…no need for a 1B/DH. Only Arizona if Goldschmidt falters horribly would be the least bit interested, but do they really see themselves as WS contenders this year? Who really needs a Carlos Pena more than a rebuilding team with a lot of money coming off the books and the desire to have a “clubhouse guy” or two around all the kids? As a Cubs fan, it sucks, but it’s true.

pft
15 years ago

I wonder if Carl Crawford would clear waivers?

Toffer Peak
15 years ago
Reply to  pft

By definition, in a competitive market, immediately after a free agent deal is signed no team should want to claim a player off waivers, since they have presumably signed with the team that offered them the best deal. Now that time has passed since the deal obviously perceptions can change. Considering Crawford’s performance so far I don’t see any reason why a team would put in a claim for him.

Joe
15 years ago
Reply to  Toffer Peak

@toffer

Untrue as long as the Type A free agency system is still around. Picks #16-45 have real value.

Phillie697
14 years ago
Reply to  Toffer Peak

Are you saying picks #16-45 is worth $100 million?

Toffer Peak
14 years ago
Reply to  Toffer Peak

Joe you’re right but it’s not too big a difference, Type A probably cost CC about $4M or so.

http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/valuing-the-draft-part-one/

Steve
15 years ago
Reply to  pft

Yes, he would. What team would claim him?

dougiejays
15 years ago

The Dodgers are awful and bankrupt and Kuroda is a 36-year-old making twelve million dollars. It’s a terrible move from a baseball perspective but a straight waive would almost make some sense.

Shaun Catron
15 years ago

what about Kyle Farnsworth? word is that the Rays are going to place him on waivers.