What Can The Nationals Do?
The Nationals have not played very well in the second half. This isn’t news. Since the break, they have an 8-12 record and have been outscored by 11 runs. This isn’t a soul-crushing stretch by any means, but when your competition is red hot, a stretch where you’re only scoring 3.65 runs per game can certainly seem soul crushing. The interesting question to me is what the Nationals can do about it? Are they content to just wait this out and take the patient approach that eventually their hitters will snap out of it, or is it time for action? Actually, let’s rephrase that — what actions can the Nationals even take?
We know that the Nationals have a great pitching staff. Their bullpen unit is solid. The core unit they’ve relied on the most the past 30 days — Aaron Barrett, Casey Janssen, Felipe Rivero, Tanner Roark and Drew Storen — has done pretty well. The worst xFIP- among those pitchers for the past 30 days is Rivero’s 114. For the season, the highest belongs to Janssen at 108. Perhaps there isn’t enough reliability in that group, especially given Storen’s playoff experience. So to that mix they have added Jonathan Papelbon. Potential problem addressed.
The rotation is even better. It hasn’t quite performed up to its lofty praise, and a large part of why is Doug Fister, who simply has not been very good this season. His 4.24 xFIP over the last 30 days isn’t that bad, but there’s not that much time left for him to right the ship, and the Nationals have a better current option available in Joe Ross. As such, they’re set to move Fister to the bullpen when Stephen Strasburg returns from the disabled list tomorrow. Problem addressed.
The offense though, has been a bigger bugaboo. For the season, their 101 wRC+ has been just fine, ranking 11th. But if you look at the team statistics, you see that only five hitters have been above that 100 threshold — Bryce Harper, Denard Span, Yunel Escobar, Clint Robinson and Anthony Rendon. And what Span, Robinson and Rendon have in common is that they’ve only suited up for half a season or less — Robinson because he is a part-time player, and for Span and Rendon because of injury.
One of those good hitters, Robinson, is now a man without a home. He had been manning first base and left field with Jayson Werth and Ryan Zimmerman out of the lineup, but with them back he is back to a bench/spot start role. Zimmerman, who is heating up since his return at the end of July — he popped two homers in his first seven games back — will require those prescribed rest days, so Robinson can help some at first. The outfield is a different story.
Werth came back at the same time that Zimmerman did, but instead of lifting the team up, he has helped dragged them down. Over the last 30 days, the team’s wRC+ has cratered to 89, leaving them 25th in the game. The team has six players who have posted at least 20 plate appearances and a wRC+ of 24 or less — Danny Espinosa, Tyler Moore, Wilson Ramos, Dan Uggla, Jose Lobaton and Werth. That’s, uh, an issue. Werth’s performance has been particularly troubling. He missed the standard two months with his wrist injury, but just getting back in the lineup isn’t always the final step with wrist injuries. He may be a non-factor down the stretch. And there has been a double whammy of sorts in taking out one of the to-date productive hitters in Robinson and replacing him with the non-productive Werth.
There is also an unproductive hitter in center in Michael Taylor. That’s not to say Taylor hasn’t filled in admirably for Denard Span. He has. It’s just that his main contributions come on the defensive side, where he grades out well by UZR, DRS and Inside Edge. Span is set to begin a rehab assignemnt next week, and could be back by the end of the month.
So let’s look forward three weeks. By the beginning of September, the team may be close to 100%, with Lobaton/Ramos at catcher, Zimmerman at first, Rendon at second, Escobar at third, Desmond at short, and Werth, Span and Harper in the outfield. So, perhaps there is nothing reasonable they can do. But if Werth and Desmond continue to be sieves at the dish, then perhaps it’s time to do something unreasonable. Just what would it take to land Justin Upton, Carlos Gonzalez or Jay Bruce, if they sneak through waivers? (Well, Gonzalez should fly through, if he hasn’t already.) It would surely rankle Werth if he were replaced by anyone, but it’d be less so if they land a big bat.
As for Desmond, perhaps it’s time to see Trea Turner. General manager Mike Rizzo poured cold water on that idea the other day, and emphasized that “you have to take slow and careful increments in trying to get better.” The obvious problem with that solution is that time is running out on this season, and the Nationals really have no reason to care about Desmond beyond this season, with him set for free agency after it.
Perhaps these aren’t the team’s biggest problems. Perhaps, as we have heard this week from both Jeff Passan and Jon Heyman, manager Matt Williams is the team’s biggest problem. That’s harder to judge, but it’s certainly plausible.
The Nationals have become relevant because of the slow and careful steps that Rizzo and his talented front office have taken. And they have addressed two (potential) problems already in acquiring Papelbon and moving Fister to the bullpen. But their window is closing — Jordan Zimmermann is set to be a free agent, and Jayson Werth and Ryan Zimmerman seem to have new aches and pains each year. Washington probably isn’t going to fade out of contention in the next month and a half, but if they want to leapfrog over their competition, perhaps it’s time to take a stupid risk like bowling over the Rockies for Carlos Gonzalez or promoting a rookie with barely a year of pro ball under his belt or even firing the manager. Because as a wise man once said, it’s the stupid risks that make life worth living.
Paul Swydan used to be the managing editor of The Hardball Times, a writer and editor for FanGraphs and a writer for Boston.com and The Boston Globe. Now, he owns The Silver Unicorn Bookstore, an independent bookstore in Acton, Mass. Follow him on Twitter @Swydan. Follow the store @SilUnicornActon.
Desmond is at least showing signs that everyone wants to ignore. IN the 20 games since the break, he’s at .250/.311/.515.
Definitely showing signs of being at least some of his old self. But he has also struck out 34.7% of the time during that span, so there’s that, too.
Perhaps Anthony Rendon could be courteous enough to actually hit the ball from time to time.
14.6% k rate. what the problem is?
1 HR. 0 SB.
He just needs to get on base for Harper.
Steals and hitting the ball arent related.biggest problem has been everyone but rendon, harper and span.
he has like 60 at bats, some of which have come while he’s been hurt, is one of the only Nats with a wRC over 100 and you’re gonna get on him cuz he only has 1 HR? get over yourself
Have you even looked at his stat line Spa City? Just passed 100 ABs and he’s got a 110 wRC+. Not great but good enough. He’s not part of the Nats problem (other than being unable to stay healthy).
Of course. It is just a bit frustrating to see him follow up on his breakout 131 wRC+ age 24 season with a relatively weak, injury riddled disappointment.
But we don’t need to agree about Rendon. We are allowed to have different opinions.
YEAH IM SUPER UPSET THAT A GUY GOT INJURED AND ISNT IMMEDIATELY BACK TO BEING AN MVP CANDIDATE
Danny Espinosa has a wRC+ of 97 and excellent defense and has earned 1.8 WAR in 90 games. If anyone should replace Desmond it’s him.
Mostly based on a hot start to the season and playing at second, not short. Not that he isn’t athletic enough to play short, but he’s got no practice there recently. More importantly, his bat has been cold for the last month and a half, a couple important hits aside.
I don’t think the Nats have time to mess around with Espinosa. If Desmond goes back into a slump for any length of time, it’s time to call up Turner. You can’t lose the division with your best shortstop in AAA.
Thanks for the article.
I think the Nats can do fine if they Werth, Zimmerman, Desmond, and maybe Ramos can juts post wRC+ marks of 100 each ROS. That would blow away the production to date of all four of them, yet it is still a lower than where ZiPS/Steamer/Depth Charts have Werth and Zimmerman, and just above where those projections have Desmond and Ramos.
*can just
*still lower
—
Overall, I think there’s a reason you’re qualifying the word “risk” with the adjective “stupid” ;P
Fans love stupid risks. Commenters love stupid risk. They generate the three c’s: conversation; controversy; and clicks! But it’s a dumb way to run a baseball team.
For an analysts’ site, this article sure makes a lot of hay out of small sample sizes. 20 plate appearances? Srsly?
Zimmerman being back makes a huge difference. Even though his batting average since returning is meh, his LD% and hard contact% (as indicated by pages on this very site) are excellent – he’s hitting the ball wicked hard. Werth’s season statistics are abysmal, but context is important. Because of his shoulder surgery he had no Spring Training at all, and came out of the gate lousy. Once he shook the rust off he really started to hit well – then got his wrist fractured by a HBP. I expect that he will need 50-100 at bats to get back up to speed again, but once he does he will help. He’s arguably been the best hitter on the team the last two seasons, and even if his power takes longer to come around the Nats would happily take a discounted (for age) version of his 2012 season stats (coming off of a broken wrist) – even with no power, a healthy Jayson Werth is an OBP machine. Heck, even Wilson Ramos is starting to get the ball off the ground and produce.
The smart move, as defined as “the most likely to result in success,” is likely to stay the course and fill in as available. No decision is guaranteed to succeed or fail – heck, in baseball Buddy Biancalana can become a postseason hero while Ted Williams is a goat. Pundits will love the exciting moves, because of the 3 c’s above. But I suspect that Rizzo is a colder calculator than that.
Was going to make a response about how ridiculous this article is in July, but you put it perfectly. Why would Rizzo make any move when his team, one whose had a first half from hell, remains the most talented in the majors and is due for some massive positive regression. 1.5 games back, as well. The Nationals need to get Werth, Zim and Rendon up to speed and then they will run away with the division leaving mets fans asking “what happened?”.
Ahh, the old “if our injured players get healthy, and our underperforming players start to play better, then we’ll be in great shape!”. A lot of fans have that logic in Spring Training, only to realize that some of the overachievers will start to slack off and some healthy players will get injured too.
Look at what you said about Werth’s injuries. He had shoulder surgery before Spring Training, and fractured his wrist by a HBP. He’s been horrible all year long. Is there any reason to think he’ll likely regress to his former self by the end of September, or is it reasonable to think that this might be a wasted year for him and he needs an off-season of rest? And if it does take about 100 at bats to get him back to speed, then that puts him towards the end of August before he starts hitting.
I do agree that they should stick with their players and hope for the best. If it takes 1-2 top prospects to get someone like Upton, it’s not worth it. But at this point it’s just hope. There’s a legit chance that they’re on the outside looking in once we get to October.
Win the Wild card game because that is where this team is likely headed. However, by then Werth and Zimmerman should have their hitting back to the expected levels and this team could be tough in the postseason.
The Pirates and Cubs are both equally as hot as the Mets. According to fangraphs playoff odds, the chances of an NL East team claiming a wild card spot is only 16%.
Pirates or Cubs > Nationals. They need to be playing for the division.
Wait a second.
“We know that the Nationals have a great pitching staff.” I’m sure the words “know” and “great” were intended largely to induce a response, so I’ll oblige.
I’d phrase it instead: “Before the season, we all believed the Nationals had a great pitching staff spearheaded by what should have been one of the very best rotations of recent memory.”
And it simply turned out not to be true. Injuries and underperformance have turned a great staff into a merely good one.
+1 for screen name
mets take the division…they are too hot. wash better give a crap bout my mets just like how harvey blows a 97 mph fastball past harper 3 times.
I’m also a mets fan. This race isn’t even close to over. So, why don’t you shut your mouth before you choke on your own foot.
Mets starters are superior to nationals and the bats are not far behind with Darnald and wright joining the deadline acquisitions. The race is now out of the Nationals hand
They need mets injury or slump or more likely the mets shutting Down Harvey Degrom and Thor. The gap will likely get bigger next year too
The race is out of the Nats hands? Yep, Wright and Darnald will hit right out of the shoot unlike Zimmerman and Werth. Strasburg will still suck!
Ha!
From Chicago.
The definition of out of the hand would be that they could win all their games and still miss the playoff which is correct as we speak
Actually no, it’s not correct. You forget that the teams still have six head-to-head games. So the Nats’ fate remains in their (at the moment fairly unsteady) hands.
That’s a fair definition, but by that definition, your statement is incorrect. Nats play the Mets 6 more times this year, so if the Nats win all of their remaining games, the Mets will have at least 6 losses. Unless the Mets are more than 3 games up heading into the final series, the Nats’ fate will be in their hands right up until that last weekend.
Are you joking? They’ve gone 46-17 against the mets the past 3 years. The nationals have had a nightmare season by any measurement and yet here, after their worst stretch of the season, one that coincided with the mets best or 2nd best, are 1.5 games back with 50 to go.
As for the future, the nats have 2 elite pitching prospects to pair with Strasburg, Gio and Scherzer and an elite SS to replace Desmond and a guy who will be a worst a 3-4 WAR player to replace span and at best a Carlos Gomez like talent. The mets may have pitching, aka a good top 3, but they have 0 offensive talent in the pipeline to pair with their 0 offensive talent on the major league roster that is signed long term.
What does the head to head record from even last year have to do with anything? The Astros were terrible from 2011-2014, should we think they’re going to implode at a .400 win clip the rest of the season because of those years?
I agree that it’s far from over and Washington still has to be seen as a favorite but that logic is crazy talk.
Oh, and to the question at hand. John C. above is right. The Nats don’t have to do anything. Unfortunately for the Mets, they will ALL start to hit….AND pitch and go on a streak. They are the much better team.
I think playing out the hand they have is the most likely way to succeed. I’m making no predictions concerning whether they WILL succeed.
“Perhaps these aren’t the team’s biggest problems. Perhaps, as we have heard this week from both Jeff Passan and Jon Heyman, manager Matt Williams is the team’s biggest problem. That’s harder to judge, but it’s certainly plausible.”
I know we can’t exactly quantify manager impact, but having a decent manager instead of Matt Williams would easily be worth 3 wins (and, hence, the lead in the division). I can think of three in the last two weeks, in fact.
i follow the DC baseball scene very closely, and I assure you, Matt Williams is 100% the problem.
http://www.steakandthebear.com/why-matt-williams-is-the-anti-torre/
TRADE Stephen Strasburgh , his name is bigger than his stats , their are some dum GMs out there , who think they will get the
Straus from his rookie season. ROCKIES are pitching desperate , missed the boat by sitting on their hands .If I was GM trade
Straus, Desmond ,Pitching prospect for Cargo, Rosario , you might lose a little defensively with wilin at 1st but imagine what the lineup looks like with those two book ending Harper.
I can tell you’re a mets troll because of the misspelling of Strasburg. Nice try. Since we are already here, why not click on over to Strasburg’s player page. Because he’s been a great pitcher his entire career.
I’m an Orioles fan, but I do get the chance to check out the Nationals a bit since I also get all of their games on TV. I’d like to see them bring up Trea Turner, but I think they said we wouldn’t be seeing Turner in DC this year.
KYLE ..you must be referring to me .a (Mets troll) WTF …YOU SEE WHAT YOU WANT LOOKING AT HIS PAGE .
This is a comment board , and I stand buy my statement , what your gonna take yesterday’s performance vs. the Lowly ass Rockies as the reason to keep him . Like I wrote times before at other blogs the Nats need some offense. And Cargo would of been a great fit ( 2 hrs today off your Prize Pick Scherzer ) ( check the spelling ) .
I’am a baseball fan and if I was a METS TROLL why would I give my opinion on making your team better .
You chastise me for adding a H in his name …well go to ____ELL!!!
Do you really think anyone is going to take you seriously when you write like a 7 year old?
Or are you intentionally using the wrong spelling of every other word, randomly capitalizing words in the middle of sentences, and generally writing nonsense in every post?
Stephen’s stats 123 game starts and 717 IP …WOW for a superstar that adds up < than 6 IP on the average . Given 256 ER IN THOSE INNINGS that's 2.9 avg let's say 3 …so 3 ER in 6Ip or less is not a great pitcher . Like I said he's a big time name , not a big time pitcher …Sometimes you have to give something to get something.
You have to even admit he's been disappointing considering all the hub bub about him .
His career ERA is 3.19, not 4.50.
256 ER in 123 games is about 2 per game. So he’s giving up about 2 runs each game, in about 6 innings.
You’re looking at how many runs he gives up per 9 innings, then dividing that by 6 innings per start.
So…we’re all supposed to pretend Strasburg is a pile of trash, because fans with your level of analysis (aka none) thought he was supposed to become the genetic child of Bob Gibson and Sandy Koufax?
Sorry, when dumb fans overhype a very good player, those same dumb fans don’t get to tell the reasonable fans they’re wrong for saying that player is very good, despite not meeting the unrealistic expectations hoisted on them by dumb fans.
To be fair, the expectations weren’t hoisted on them by just the dumb fans. When he was drafted, he was considered a once-in-a-generation talent. After coming out and dominating from the get-go, there were plenty of people who thought he would be a perennial CY Young candidate. While he has been very good, most people seemed to expect more.
It’s foisted.
And yes, Viva is absolutely right. “Generational talent” was how every evaluator described Stras on draft day — just as with Bryce Harper.
Stephen S. has been worth either 11.6 WAR or 16.4 WAR over his 5+ years, depending on whether one utilizes Fangraphs or B-Ref. And that ain’t generational.
It may have been too much to assume that Werth, Rendon, and Zimmerman would just start hitting right after being out for extended time. Barring injuries to those 3 or Harper, they ought to be winning 60% from here on out.
Their biggest issue seems to be Storen at this point.
Yes Storen’s recent two bad games are why they’ve under-performed this year.A few teams “ought” to be playing better.
Agree on the 60% figure, which would give about a 31-21 finish and an 88 win season. That might be enough to take the division.