What Happened To Chase Headley?

Another piece in this year’s trade deadline mosaic fell into place on Monday, as Chase Headley was dealt from the Padres to the Yankees in exchange for 3B Yangervis Solarte and High-A RHP Rafael De Paula. Headley promptly jumped on a plane, was inserted into what became a 14-inning marathon with the Rangers, and delivered the game-winning hit. Moments like this have been hard to come by for the switch-hitting third baseman since 2012, when he unfurled a .286-.376-.498 line with 31 HR and an NL-leading 115 RBI, while playing his home games in a pitchers’ park.

He basically became the poster child for an underachieving, and dare I say boring Padres club. It’s clearly unfair to heap all of the 2013-14 Padres’ problems on the back of Headley, but it goes with the territory when you bat in the middle of the order daily and haul down a large salary by San Diego standards. What on earth has happened to Headley since 2012, and what can the Yankees expect to get from their new third sacker for the rest of the 2014 season?

Headley was a chief topic of discussion in virtually every draft room back in 2005, when the Padres selected him in the 2nd round. He was one of those “college performer” types that lacked in-your-face physical tools, and didn’t impress many traditional scouts. I was the Brewers’ Assistant Scouting Director at the time, and we talked long and hard about Headley. Our scouts were split on him, but oh, those numbers……Headley hit .387-.534-.689 for Tennessee that season, against very strong competition, and even more strikingly, had a sterling 63 walks as compared to only 23 strikeouts.

He was a switch-hitter, and his sturdy 6’2, 200+ frame looked like it could grow into some home run power. He was the classic “hit before power” guy, one of the few college bats in any draft that you’d really like to get your mitts on. As it turned out, the Padres made a great pick: Headley and Yunel Escobar — though Travis Wood might eventually have something to say about it — have established themselves as the two best players to come from that 2005 2nd round.

Headley torched his way through the Padres’ minor league system, batting .301.-398-.498 overall and first forcing his way to the big club barely two years after being drafted. In 2008, he became a Padre regular, splitting time between left field and third base. Each season, I create an ordered list of minor league position players and starting pitchers who meet a sliding scale of relative production and age criteria. Headley qualified for this list in each of his minor league seasons, with a lofty peak rank of #15 following his 2007 Double-A campaign. This marked him as an extremely likely major league starter, possessing star upside.

For his first three and a half major league seasons, Headley might not have been a star, but he was a solidly above average player, combining above average defense with an average to slightly above average bat. The power was slow to develop, but the strikeouts that come when a player is attempting to tap into his power started to pile up.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

His always solid walk rate made him a solid on-base threat throughout this period. Headley supplemented his value by stealing 44 bags on only 54 attempts over this period. He was basically a 3.0 WAR guy heading into his arbitration years, and both club and player were content to see where his continued development would lead before entering into any type of long-term commitment.

Then 2012 happened. The strikeouts and walk totals remained high, but Headley finally tapped into his power. He had hit 36 homers in the three and a half seasons preceding 2012…..and has hit only 27 since. Let’s take a closer look at his recent past by examining his 2012-14 plate appearance outcome frequency and production by BIP type data to see what has gone wrong. First, the frequency data:

FREQ – 2012
Headley % REL PCT
K 22.5% 114 76
BB 12.3% 154 91
POP 4.4% 52 11
FLY 33.2% 114 82
LD 22.1% 99 47
GB 40.3% 101 57
FREQ – 2013
Headley % REL PCT
K 23.7% 119 83
BB 11.2% 141 85
POP 4.7% 60 19
FLY 30.1% 106 65
LD 22.4% 105 62
GB 42.8% 101 55
FREQ – 2014
Headley % REL PCT
K 23.8% 117 80
BB 7.1% 91 40
POP 6.1% 79 33
FLY 32.0% 115 83
LD 25.4% 122 92
GB 36.5% 84 10

Headley’s strikeout percentile ranks have floated in a narrow band between 76 and 83 since 2012. That’s not exactly what one would have expected by looking at his college stat line, but it just goes to show how high a bar must be set when looking at college stats, especially back then, prior to the change in the standard of the bats used by the NCAA. The plunge in Headley’s BB rate percentile rank, from 91 in 2012 to 40 this season, is very alarming, but it is likely more of an effect than a cause.

One of the best things Headley has going for him as a hitter is his ability to maintain a low popup rate while hitting a lot of fly balls. Only high quality hitters can do this. His pop up percentile ranks have ranged from 11 to 33 over the past three seasons, and believe it or not, the 33 will be a career high if maintained until season’s end. His fly ball percentile rank has ranged from 65 to 83 since 2012, and has been above MLB average in all but one of his seasons as a regular. Headley has also consistently posted high line drive rates – his 47 percentile rank in 2012 is his career low, and his mediocre 2014 numbers are propped up by a very high liner rate (92 percentile rank).

Prior to 2014, the foundation for a very strong offensive foundation was still in place. The solid BB rate offset the high K rate to a large extent, and the absence of popups and abundance of line drives kept alive the possibility of hitting for both average and power. As long as he was able to continue to hit the ball hard in the air, of course. Now let’s take a look at his production by BIP type for 2012-14, both before and after adjustment for context, and see if he has been able to do so:

PROD – 2012
Headley AVG OBP SLG REL PRD ADJ PRD
FLY 0.431 1.188 233 189
LD 0.646 0.792 100 100
GB 0.251 0.269 110 118
ALL BIP 0.385 0.670 157 145
ALL PA 0.285 0.374 0.497 143 135
PROD – 2013
Headley AVG OBP SLG REL PRD ADJ PRD
FLY 0.330 0.725 110 105
LD 0.617 0.827 90 109
GB 0.239 0.290 111 117
ALL BIP 0.343 0.549 115 124
ALL PA 0.250 0.335 0.399 107 113
PROD – 2014
Headley AVG OBP SLG REL PRD ADJ PRD
FLY 0.302 0.746 109 79
LD 0.580 0.680 69 110
GB 0.181 0.194 55 103
ALL BIP 0.310 0.483 93 112
ALL PA 0.227 0.284 0.354 81 96

Headley’s actual production on each BIP type is indicated in the AVG and SLG columns, and it’s converted to run values and compared to MLB average in the REL PRD column. That figure then is adjusted for context, such as home park, luck, etc., in the ADJ PRD column. For the purposes of this exercise, SH and SF are included as outs and HBP are excluded from the OBP calculation.

Let’s cut right to the chase here – Headley’s fly ball production, both before and after adjustment for context, has fallen off a cliff since 2012. Remember, Headley hits a lot of fly balls, so his fly ball authority is the essence of his game. High walk and liner rates and a low popup rate make you solid and reliable – but if you want to be a star, you have to do damage in the air. Headley’s ADJ PRD on fly balls has plummeted from 189 in 2012 to 105 in 2013 to an unacceptably low 79 thus far in 2014. His liner and grounder authority has been a bit above average throughout the entire measurement period – his decline in batted-ball production has been solely attributable to diminished fly ball authority.

Digging a little deeper into the numbers points out some other disturbing developments. In 2012, Headley hit 37 fly balls at 97.5 MPH or harder, and 23 of them were hit from LCF to RCF, in the middle of the field. In 2013, he hit only 9 fly balls that hard, and only 4 of them were hit from LCF to RCF. This season, he has hit only 5 fly balls that hard, and only 2 of them were hit from LCF to RCF. Not only is he hitting the ball in the air with significantly less authority, he has totally lost the ability to do damage in the air to the gaps, where you have to hit the ball that hard to do so.

You can hit 90 MPH homers down the line, depending on the park. This has resulted in him pulling the ball more from both sides of the plate, and has caused his actual performance on grounders to decline substantially, as evidenced by his 55 ADJ PRD this season. Another consequence of his loss of power to anywhere but the extreme pull side is the decline in his walk rate. Pitchers are no longer afraid to challenge Headley, as balls that he used to drive to the gaps and beyond are now routine fly outs.

This is a fairly common sequence of events for a player in decline. Peak fly ball authority decreases, the player has to pull more to tap into his power, holes in his plate coverage materialize, and pitchers no longer need to nibble around the edges of the plate to have success. Is Headley in an irreversible decline? Not necessarily. There could be something eminently correctable in his swing mechanics that could get him back on track to some extent. On balance, however, I would surmise that his best days are behind him. He is not a great athlete or quick-twitch type. He has also begun to accumulate some nagging injuries, and the back tweak that landed him on the DL last month is particularly worrisome.

Taking a step back and analyzing this deal, however, it appears to be a very solid gamble by the Yankees. For all of his early season heroics, Solarte is what he is – a six-year minor league free agent signee who made good. He’s a fringe to marginal big leaguer, not good enough to start, not versatile enough to be a quality backup. He’s a tough out who can hold his own in the majors over short stretches.

De Paula has a live arm and has missed a lot of bats, though at 23 he’s a bit old to have never pitched a Double-A inning. He did rank #74 on my list of minor league pitching prospects last year, and #102 on my 2014 midseason list. Until he has similar upper minor league success, this merely marks him as a guy to watch, but not a top prospect. He likely projects as a pen arm, but does have a solid chance to have a big league future.

Headley’s defensive performance has remained strong as he has slumped offensively, and he could benefit offensively by the move to Yankee Stadium. Fly ball hitters make their bones down the lines (and to RCF) in Yankee Stadium, and Headley’s dead RF hot spot now matches up perfectly with his ballpark’s. Yankee Stadium has made a lot of one-dimensional and/or declining hitters look better than they are, and Headley could continue that tradition.

For two to three months, this has a chance to be a very good marriage. Afterward? Clubs should be very careful not to put too much stock into a strong finish in a friendly park, and instead pay closer heed to what appears to be a player in steady offensive decline. Short-term, reasonable dollars deal as a glove-first reclamation project? I’m in. Three or more years at $10M+? No thanks.





26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
SS90Member since 2017
12 years ago

Very interesting analysis. Only quip is the suggested pricing at the end. In today’s market, the description of what deal you might give versus pass seems out of line with even the value you expect Chase to provide. If he is the glove-first and average hitting 3B that you describe (even taking away the upside you describe), he shouldn’t decline at that steep of a rate in terms of overall value. This year he is on pace for about 3 fWAR. Lets use the crude aging process and say his next three years he would produce 2.5, 2.0, 1.5, at a market rate that I will make $6,000,000/Win since we have deemed that a reasonable estimate, this would produce a fair value at 3 years, $36 Million.

I really liked your analysis, so I dont mean this as criticism. Just thought there was a gap between your analysis and how to then quantify that in value.

One final point, I believe with a baseline of his defense, Chase will decline less than the numbers above and we worth more than the deal described above.

joser
12 years ago
Reply to  SS90

“quip” vs “quibble” — autocorrect, perhaps?

FeslenR
12 years ago
Reply to  joser

Quip can be used as quibble, just fyi…though not often.

LHPSU
12 years ago

Like Vernon Wells and Alfonso Soriano, I believe that Headley will hit great for two months, then fall back off the cliff.

joser
12 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

The pinstripes do work for a while, but the magic wears off.

Emcee Peepants
12 years ago

I’m not sure it’s accurate to point to 2012 as who Headley is as a player. Prior to 2012, he hit .269/.343/.392, .326 wOBA, 106 wRC+, and a .123 ISO in 2114 PAs. Since 2012 he has hit .243/.330/.385, .317 wOBA, 105 wRC+, and a .142 ISO in 913 PAs. Looks to me like a slightly above-average hitter declining into a not-quite-as-good slightly above average hitter.

I think 2012 has just caused expectations to be unfairly raised for him, when it was “just one of those seasons”. But even then, it was only the second half. His 2012 first half looked like Chase Headley, going .267/.368/.414, .345 wOBA, 124 wRC+, .146 ISO with 8 HR in 370 PAs. In the second half, he looked like 1980 Mike Schmidt, going .308/.386/.592, .414 wOBA, 170 wRC+, .284 ISO with 23 HR in 329 PAs. So basically, his whole career is being judged based on 329 anomalous PAs rather than the other 3397 that tell us who he really is as a hitter.

Will
12 years ago
Reply to  Emcee Peepants

Don’t even stop there. On July 28, Headley’s 101st game of the season and 435th PA, he was batting ‘merely’ .265/.359/.422. What happened in the ensuing 60 games was remarkable. He hit a Ruthian .322/.405/.622 over two months and 264 PA.

A better article would be titled ‘What Happened to Chase Headley in August and September 2012?’ Because whatever it was, he’s never been able to replicate it since.

Larry
12 years ago
Reply to  Will

Well, he was a prime topic right up to the trade deadline. To that point he was hitting .268 with 12 homers and 52 RBI. When he wasn’t traded, he went on a tear hitting .306, 10 homers and 31 RBI in August, then .330, 9 homers and 32 RBI in September. The last two months combined were .318, 19 homers and 63 RBI.

His first 4 months projected to .268, 18 homers and 78 RBI. His last 2 months over a year would be .318, 57 homers and 189 RBI. I’d say, throw out those last two months and project the first four and you have the real Headley. His recent dropoff isn’t decline but the nagging knee, calf and back injuries.

The fact he relaxed after he wasn’t traded in 2012, and his comment after his first game with the Yankees about the difficulty of focusing with the Padres, led some fans to think he’s a head case. Fans thought he had 10.5 million reason$ to focus.

Away from Petco, he could be a .270, 20 homer, 85 RBI guy the next couple years, with gold glove defense. He’s 30 now, so I would go past two years with him, especially with the back problem.

David K
12 years ago

Another thing to consider: after his breakout 2012 year, and the lack of a significant supporting cast in the order, the pressure was on him to be a main cog in the offense, so perhaps he was being less selective at the plate. Perhaps with a stronger lineup, he can relax more and lay off some borderline pitches, take a walk, and let someone else do some damage. Although there is the added pressure of playing in New York, so that may cancel everything out.

Captain Obvious
12 years ago
Reply to  David K

Perhaps being part of a stronger lineup would help him, but instead he’s on the Yankees.

Johnston
12 years ago

Line of the month.

Max G
12 years ago

It is difficult to pinpoint the root cause of the “329 anomalous PAs,” particularly the sheer magnitude of the difference of that small sample versus the results of Headley’s larger 3,000+ PA sample.

As is almost always the case when a player suddenly improves at the plate, like stale creamer in a cup of joe, the unwarranted steroid accusations surface, as was the case during Headley’s remarkable 2nd-half surge in 2012. Headley’s response to the unsupportable accusations during his career year could help us solve the mystery as to why he was so good. It’s pretty simple, really, and something players have been doing since baseball was invented— mechanical adjustments.

Chase Headley in 2012:
“…I know what I’m doing. I know the results of the work I’m putting in, know that I’m getting more knowledgeable about my swing. It’s not me necessarily hitting the ball any harder. It’s learning how to hit correctly.”

Given that he was aware of what he had to do at the plate to improve, and managed to do so 2 years ago but has failed since, I believe his downward spiral in the batters box is likely injury-driven. Headley has had all the incentive in the world to improve at the plate and play for that big, career-defining contract, and the fact that he has failed to do so despite an above-average talent level means he probably played through some injuries that he shouldn’t have, and he can’t approach 2012 no matter what adjustments he makes mechanically. Mr. Blengino’s eloquent analysis supports this theory.

Emcee Peepants
12 years ago
Reply to  Max G

I agree whole-heartedly, 2012 is not coming back, and the article’s analysis is solid. I also wasn’t trying to imply Headley was on PEDs or anything. I was merely highlighting that we have likely set the bar too high based on too little evidence.

FeslenR
12 years ago

Maybe Chase was never that good to begin with….?

RainmakerMember since 2016
12 years ago

I know I continue to beat this dead horse, but as great of a tool as statistical analysis can be, its worthless without the scouting context.

This whole article basically assumes Headley is a static entity, when in reality he’s had to change his mechanics due to the thumb injury in 2013. In a UTSanDiego article less than two weeks ago, Headley noted that after he broke his thumb in Spring of 2013 he had to ditch his overlapping grip of the bat for a more traditional grip to protect his thumb. He only felt able to switch back to the grip he’s used his whole life toward the end of June this season. Since the beginning of July, Headley’s hitting .324 with a .141 ISO.

Now I’m not saying that is the definitive story on Headley and now he’s going to be “back”, but you can’t cut his stats 30 different ways and completely ignore the player himself and expect to have anything worthwhile to show for it. You need to take a holistic approach, which includes the qualitative factors like first-hand scouting.

Going back to the comment by the distinguished Mr. Peepants, Headley is not the guy from 2012, that is a statistical anomaly. He’s more likely the guy from 2009-2010, with less SBs cause he’s older and gimpier and maybe 20% more HRs since he’s playing in a much better park. Considering he’s a top 5 defender at the position, a .265 AVG and 16 HR/year power is pretty valuable.

Yovani Gallardo
12 years ago
Reply to  Rainmaker

Agreed, and you also need to look at all of the injuries that were facing his opposing pitchers and defenders. That way, we aren’t arbitrarily deciding which injuries should be ignored regarding statistics and which injuries should be wholeheartedly counted.

robertobeersMember since 2020
12 years ago

Homerun and Fly Ball Batted Ball Distances (as of 7/24/2014):
2014 282.95 feet
2013 282.09 feet
2012 304.47 feet
2011 284.44 feet
2010 285.52 feet

Hmm… which of these doesn’t belong?

Johnston
12 years ago
Reply to  robertobeers

One of these things is not like the other, one of these things looks assisted.

Bleacher Report
12 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

Baseless steroids accusations? You belong with us!

Reds Fan
12 years ago

I’m kind of left wanting the next act of this article: a closer examination of what things can generally happen to cause the declines noted here … and what really might have happened in this case, e.g. Headley’s broken thumb.

Love the article (particularly the draft year debate) but it feels incomplete.

Ctownboy
12 years ago

Seems to me Headley had half a good season which a LOT of people got overly fired up about. Same as Domonic Brown with the Phillies…..

Steve
12 years ago
Reply to  Ctownboy

I agree with this comment. Only thing I would add is that when Headley does “regress to his mean”, he is still a good player, just not a superstar. Dominic Brown, not so much.

Ted Brogan
12 years ago

Baseball players aren’t great or reliable sources of information for explanations on improvement/decline, but Headley claims his return to form is from going back to his old batting grip:

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/Jul/08/chase-headley-grip-handle-padres/

Who knows whether or not it’s true. A lot of times people make the post hoc ergo propter hoc mistake to explain a change. Baseball players are no exception to this tendency, especially in the middle of a season when they don’t have a lot of time to figure out what is wrong with their performance.

I’m a Padres fan, and I’ve always liked Headley. He is a good baseball player and, more importantly, a good person. I wish him nothing but the best on the Yankees and in free agency, unless he’s playing my team. Then I need him to suck, and suck hard.

Roaddawg
12 years ago

The best part of the article was when you cut to the chase

Hurtlocker
12 years ago

So what happens when Arod comes back next year? He becomes a DH while Headley starts at third? I see more Yankee angst on the horizon while they try to figure out what to do with Arod.

FuriousToaster
12 years ago
Reply to  Hurtlocker

Or they can just do… exactly what you just said and there is no angst or issue at all?