What Happened to Ricky Romero

Right now, like as this is being written, Ricky Romero is in the process of getting bombed by the Red Sox. The 27-year-old lefty just finished an inning in which he gave up a double to Dustin Pedroia between two walks before an error and a few groundouts allowed singles from Mike Aviles and Darnell McDonald to plate some runs. Six runs in all. So far all the balls in play have been ground balls — his bailiwick — but something is still off.

Going into the start today, the primary culprits were not at fault. The batting average on balls in play that Romero has allowed this year is higher than the one he allowed last year, yes. But the ‘new’ number is .252 and last year’s number was .241. That’s not the problem. Neither can we blame a velocity drop. Well, he’s down a tick from 92.1 mph to 91.1 mph, but his career velocity is 91.5 mph on the fastball. That’s not the problem, either. He’s using his curveball a little more than he has in the past, but are we going to blame his two-run difference in ERA on 55 extra curveballs this year? It doesn’t look like he’s altered his pitching mix much otherwise, so that doesn’t look like the problem.

The obvious difference comes in his walk rate, and even in today’s big inning, the walks were a problem. Romero walked 10.3% in his rookie season, then he walked 9.3% in his decent followup, and 8.7% in his breakout season last year. Now his walk rate is at a career-worst 11.3%. You have to go back to his first shot at Double-A (in 2007) to find a walk rate that bad. Look at his strike zone stats, and you’ll notice that he’s close to league average at finding the zone (43.3% this year, 45.4% career, 45.4% is the league average this year). It’s probably not those 32 pitches outside the zone that separate him from league average. He is, however, showing a career low in first-strike percentage (52.8%) that’s well below league average (59.7%) and his own average (57%). Perhaps a renewed emphasis on strike one would solve many of Romero’s woes.

On the other hand, his current walk rate is not an extreme outlier. His career walk rate in the minor leagues was 9.7%, which is worse than average. But he was getting enough ground balls and strikeouts to make that walk rate work then. It’s not working that well right now, and there’s a general regression in his other peripherals that is contributing to the problem.

His swinging strike rate is under league average for the first time (8.0%, 8.9% is league average, 9.2% for his career). So it makes sense that he’s lost a couple ticks of his strikeout rate (16.9% this year, 18.9% career). His ground-ball rate is at a career-worst (53.4%, 54.5% career). He’s giving up a career-worst number of home runs off of his fly balls (17.1% HR/FB, 12.5% career). Some of this is luck. None of it, by itself, would sink a player completely. All of it, together, has reduced his effectiveness.

Lastly, there’s the issue of expectations. Pitch to a 2.92 ERA in the AL East over 225 innings and you’re an ace. Pitch to a 4.20 FIP/3.80 xFIP/3.78 SIERA in the AL East over 225 innings, though, and you’re a horse. Considering those numbers describe the same season, perhaps we should just have been expecting a horse. And, given the Blue Jays’ pitching health woes right now, perhaps it’s okay if their ace is actually a horse right now.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
Ad-free browsing
Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
Historical & platoon projections
Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
One-click data exports
Customizable player-page dashboards
Dark & Classic site modes
Weekly Members-only mailbag
FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
Optional homepage photo removal
Gift articles to non-members




With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

63 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Matt
14 years ago

I think it was clear to almost anyone who knows anything about baseball that this guy is/was not an ace. Sure doesn’t stop him from thinking he is one though which combined with Arencibia’s claim to be a top 10 MLB catcher can make any Blue Jay fan want to throw their remote through the TV.

Chris
14 years ago
Reply to  Matt

not an ace? what is your definition of ace? im pretty sure the red sox, orioles, indians, royals, twins, marlins, mets, astros, cubs, reds, DBacks, padres, and rockies would all call Mr Romero their #1 ace.

pretty sure you dont go 15-11 with 2.92 and 1.14 WHIP, 3 CG, and 2 Shutouts in the AL East if you are not an ace.

hes only 27 and this is his 3rd/4th year in the league. guess you dont think clayton kershaw is more than just a top 10-15 SP then too?…

Matt
14 years ago
Reply to  Chris

I think you’re on the wrong site. His win-loss record and ERA are irrelevant.

big red machine
14 years ago
Reply to  Chris

Just to speak for my team… you can have Romero. We’ll keep Johnny Cueto and his tidy HR rates, thank you very much.
And secondly, my response to you even mentioning Romero and Kershaw in the same sentence: BAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!

big red machine
14 years ago
Reply to  Chris

well, they weren’t technically in the same sentence but you know what I mean…

Uh Oh Cordero
14 years ago
Reply to  Chris

“Best pitcher in the staff” and “Ace” aren’t the same thing.

ccoop
14 years ago
Reply to  Chris

if you want to measure pitchers by W/L–and let’s be clear…you shouldn’t– 15 and 11 is pretty from from “ace” territory.

nilbog44
14 years ago
Reply to  Chris

Oh boy…. Please tell me you didn’t just lump him together with Kershaw. If this guy is an ace then there are a lot more aces in MLB than i originally thought. Sheesh.

Antonio Bananas
14 years ago
Reply to  Chris

“only 27” and mentioning his W/L record aren’t used much on here. Probably shouldn’t be either. At 27, that means he probably won’t get any better. In fact, he’ll likely get worse.

Zach
14 years ago
Reply to  Chris

This idea of an ace is pretty stupid to begin with, but wouldn’t you think the “Ace” would start the 1 game playoff if everyone was available Chris? Farrell hinted earlier this season that Morrow would pitch that hypothetical game and it would be the right call.

PeteJohn
14 years ago
Reply to  Chris

An ace is an elite pitcher, not merely the best guy on a team. Saying “he’s their ace” doesn’t make him an ace. Good results do

Jordan
14 years ago
Reply to  Chris

You’ve got to be kidding.
red sox – im sure they’d take Lester over ricky.
marlins – josh johnson
cubs – Garza, maybe Dempster.
DBacks – I’ll take their whole rotation over Romero.
Reds – Cueto, Latos.
Mets – Dickey, one of the best pitchers in the game right now, heard of him??
Orioles – Hammel pitching much better.

Truly idiotic comment.

Nik
14 years ago
Reply to  Matt

Jays fans cling to the idea he is an ace, you’ll get heat for this, even though it is 100% correct.

Johnhavok
14 years ago
Reply to  Nik

Lumping all Jays fans into 1 statement is pretty rediculous. Go visit the jays message board and the only people that consider Romero to be an ace are the drooling RBI lovers. Those of us with sabermetric understanding were pretty confident he was due for regression in his “traditional” stats.

The culprit of his woes this year from having watched him seems to be his fastball command, he’s just not getting ahead in the count with it which makes it very hard for him to use his changeup effectively.

Linz
14 years ago
Reply to  Nik

I’m a diehard Jays fan since day 1 (I’m old, I know) and I can assure you that we do not think Ricky’s an ace. Our last ace was Halladay. Ricky developed quicker than envisioned and is arguably our most talented pitcher. (BTW 15 wins in the AL East = 20 wins in the NL Central.) Not many teams have a true ace including some contenders. We’re aware of this. We’re Canadian – not stupid.

Jeff Reese
14 years ago
Reply to  Matt

He has shown ace stuff, and I think the potential for acedom is there. The regression in command/control makes him clearly not an ace, and that will be the biggest hurdle for him ever to become one.

andrew
12 years ago
Reply to  Matt

Ricky romero had a very bad catcher who only hits homers and strikes out with a batting average below .200 so it’s not completely his fault.

Oscar
14 years ago

A 1 MPH drop in average fastball velocity is not that minor. I wouldn’t discard it so quickly as a possible cause.

cs3
14 years ago
Reply to  Oscar

Exactly. A 1 mph drop doesnt seem significant, but when the range on average fastball velocity is only about 89-96 mph that 1 mph represents more than a 10% decrease

Antonio Bananas
14 years ago
Reply to  cs3

What’s the error rate of a radar gun though? If the gun’s accurate up to .5 MPH, and was really say .3 slower than the gun said and now he’s really .5 faster than the gun says on average, that shortens the gap a lot.

So yea, while 1MPH is over 10% of the range, the input might not be the most accurate either.

Ron
14 years ago

Should I drop this guy now for Kuroda, Masterson or Liriano?

jevant
14 years ago
Reply to  Ron

Should have been dropped for Kuroda yesterday, Masteron today, and Liriano tomorrow.

walt526
14 years ago
Reply to  Ron

Liriano.

Just Jim
14 years ago
Reply to  Ron

I just answered this same question on CBS Sportsline. Same Guy? I like Masterson for his stability & Liriano for his K’s. I don’t care for Kuroda but he’ll get you wins.

Ron
14 years ago
Reply to  Just Jim

Yup. Same guy. Building up the nerve to can him…

jesuscristo
14 years ago

He has Steve Blass syndrome.

Jason
14 years ago

i wouldn’t drop him for any of those 3 yet.

ALEastbound
14 years ago

If/when the Blue Jays can make Romero there #3 starter (with a healthy Morrow #2) they will be a serious contender. AA has to be thinking the same thing but not sure if this is the year to empty the cupboard for that starter. Hopeful they take a long look at Greinke or Hamels this offseason.

Mr. Disgruntled
14 years ago

That leaves the question, “Would either of Hamels or Greinke take a long look at a Blue Jays offer?”

jesuscristo
14 years ago

Jays operating under payroll parameters. Will not sign Hamels or Greinke.

dgapa
14 years ago
Reply to  jesuscristo

That is of course if you even believe that. They have spent more in the past and they will spend more in the future. It’s only a rule until it gets broken.

Jays2010
14 years ago
Reply to  jesuscristo

So what you are saying is that the Toronto Blue Jays are a professional sports franchise?

PeterC
14 years ago

Did anyone watch the game?

Gamescore showed a lot of questionable balls during that first inning.

That error should have been an inning ending double play as well.

Eric
14 years ago
Reply to  PeterC

even ignoring the occasional miscalls by the ump (and there were a fair bit, I admit), he still pitched like crap.

KDizzle53
14 years ago

Was looking at some pitch/fx stuff on brooksbaseball earlier today about Romero, and one of the main difference I saw is that what they register as a “sinker” has been thrown something like 11% less this year, and considering the amount of balls the pitch accounted for, it seems understandable. His 4-seam fastball also seems to have lost some vertical movement to go along with that dip in velocity, so that might explain some things as well since, according to the site, he’s increased the 4-seam’s usage by about 7%.

supershredder
14 years ago

Any thoughts on Samardizja’s continued decline (including today’s blow-up)?

supershredder
14 years ago
Reply to  supershredder

I see his pitch type profile has changed – dropped his slider usage by 7% and increased his cutter by 6%. That same slider garnered a 5.6 pitch value rating last season.

Sutcliffe
14 years ago
Reply to  supershredder

He’s the kind of guy you can build an organization around.

a
14 years ago
Reply to  supershredder

He should probably stop throwing cock shots to middle of the order hitters. that’d probably help.

juan pierres mustache
14 years ago
Reply to  supershredder

it’s not a decline–he had a few performances early on this year that were not in line with anything he’d ever done, some people bought in, then he proceeded to pitch like jeff samardzija. he’s only “declining” if you thought his first 5 starts were his true talent level

Big Daddy V
14 years ago

So, “horse” is bad, I take it. But “stud” is good! And so is “thoroughbred”… I think. What about “gelding”?

matt w
14 years ago
Reply to  Big Daddy V

“Horse” is OK, I think. Short for “workhorse,” which you can see how it differs from “stud” and “thoroughbred.”

Mick1296
14 years ago

When Roy Halliday hit the mound for the Jays, THAT was an ace. Romero has yet to show me that he is of that calibre of a pitcher. And no I’m not just saying that because he shit the bed today. He has just never given me that warm fuzzy feeling of a near guaranteed win that Halliday once did.

Samwell
14 years ago
Reply to  Mick1296

Man a lot of clueless fans have been flooding on Fangraphs lately. Are you high? A truly useless comment.

Brandon
14 years ago
Reply to  Mick1296

Yeah, his WFF blows…

Larry
14 years ago

I sense animosity towards Romero – did you all have him on your fantasy teams expecting he’d have a better year?

B N
14 years ago
Reply to  Larry

I had him last year expecting a worse season, if that counts. 🙂

Jack Morris
14 years ago

But he’s 8-1!

Don Draper
14 years ago

I get why people on this site don’t care about win loss record for a pitcher, but what’s wrong with ERA? And what do u use to measure how good a pitcher is? Thanks

CJ
14 years ago
Reply to  Don Draper

ERA is better than wins. People use:
– FIP (fielding-independent pitching) neutralises a pitcher’s BABIP, because most pitchers cannot control the distribution of hits they give up. It only counts strikeouts, walks and home runs: events where the fielders are not involved.
– xFIP neutralises a pitcher’s home run per fly ball rate, it uses Ks, BBs, and flyball percentage.
– SIERA takes the inputs of FIP (Ks, BBs, HRs) and adds a pitchers’ groundball %, line drive %, and fly ball %. The idea is that a groundball pitcher with equal K, BB, HR rates should give up less runs (both because of double-plays and because GBs don’t go for extra bases) than the flyball pitcher.

This is only for small samples, like half a season. Over a bunch of years, or a career, just go ahead and use ERA. The “luck”, things like bloop hits falling in, or guys clumping hits together, balances out.

everdiso
14 years ago

Romero is fine. When he starts pitching as bad as a Red Sox starter then I’ll be worried. Of course we don’t see any FG articles about Red Sox players struggling. Literally, ever. And every FG writer picked them to win 120 games and sweep the postseason. Why am I the only one who sees this?!

Jonathan
14 years ago
Reply to  everdiso

I was wondering when you’d show up to troll this one. It had “everdiso is going to say something ludicrous” all over it.

Now, on to the meat:

“When he starts pitching as bad as a Red Sox starter then I’ll be worried.”

Only two Sox pitchers to draw a start this year with a worse FIP than Romero right now are Cook (Across all of two starts) and Buchholz (Who has been vastly outperforming Romero since his last May start). Per the inclusion of Cook, that includes even spot starters like Morales and Matsuzaka (Yes, Matsuzaka is out-FIP’ing Romero right now). Troll harder.

Of course we don’t see any FG articles about Red Sox players struggling.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/josh-becketts-missing-fastball/

Whoops!

“Why am I the only one who sees this?!”

Because you’re making it up.

sooted72
14 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

lol jonathan methinks u just got had

Linz
14 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Don’t feed the trolls!

Jack
14 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

The funniest thing about that is that Beckett piece features everdiso complaining because apparently Dave’s not being negative enough about a Red Sox player.

vivalajeter
14 years ago
Reply to  everdiso

Jonathan, doesn’t Bard have a much higher FIP than Romero?

Jonathan
14 years ago
Reply to  vivalajeter

I don’t know what you’re talking about, viva, Bard is a catcher for the Mariners.

There is, nor has there ever been, a Red Sox starter by that name.

(I forgot about him, but yes, he counts)

Jonathan
14 years ago
Reply to  vivalajeter

Though Cook has since surpassed Romero since the initial posting, so there’s that I suppose.

Cook has managed to compile 0.3 WAR (Across three starts), which is identical to Romero (Across 16 starts).

Mark
14 years ago

I definitely wouldn’t that it’s a matter of expectations. The walk rate is up, the K rate is down, the first pitch strike % is 3rd worst in the majors. He’s falling behind everybody, he’s unable to fool opposing hitters, and he’s walking or giving up a ton of hits.

This isn’t a case of expectations at all. If he pitched like he did last year a 3.75 ERA would have been what I expected. But every time he’s falling behind hitters and getting hit hard, and that’s completely different from last year. A 3% drop in K% and 4% jump in BB% is huge.

Mark
14 years ago
Reply to  Mark

Definitely wouldn’t argue**

Glenn Jamison
14 years ago

One thing that really worried me about Romero, was his interview before the game. He sounded completely dejected about his previous outings. Came off as completely depressed to me, with absolutely no confidence. Wasn’t surprising he started the game with 6 straight balls. After he was pulled, he looked like he was hopeless, as if we thinks he’ll never be a good pitcher again. You can read whatever you want into his stats (either normal or sabermetric, or whatever), but the fact of the matter is, this guy has absolutely no confidence right now. Sure, when he’s confident and throwing strikes, he’s really good (not sure about Ace, but whatever), but I think the Jays really need to consider getting this guy a good psychologist right now.

seb
14 years ago

He’s simply getting hit harder. His LD% is up 5% from last year, he’s always been one of the best SP in terms of getting weak contact. Although last year does look like the outlier, he did alter his pitch selections a fair bit, favouring the FB on more occasions. Like a few have mentioned before, the slight decrease in average velocity could be allowing hitters to square up the ball more often. That being said though, I feel like with Ricky’s skillset, he’s going to outperform his FIP most of the time.