What’s Going On, Michael Pineda?

Michael Pineda is having a hard time right now. Not when it comes to plate appearances ended by the umpire — his strikeout minus walk percentage is 21st in the big leagues, just ahead of Jake Arrieta’s. Usually that’s good enough, since K-BB% was once shown to be the best in-season predictor, and because it’s hard to be bad if you’re striking a bunch of guys out and not really walking anyone.

Usually. But not right now. Not in the Bronx, at least. Because, since 2000, nobody has recorded a K-BB% over 15% (Pineda is at 17.7% currently) and suffered from a worse batting average on balls in play. Nobody has allowed more homers per nine innings in that group, either. After contact, the ball has not been Pineda’s friend.

Still, we might just chalk it up to luck and call it a day. We might, if it wasn’t so obvious from watching Pineda that he’s having trouble with command and that things aren’t quite right.

The homers are the most obvious thing. You might think a guy with mostly just a fastball and a slider would have troubles with lefties. He’s given up eight homers to righties against three to lefties, in similar samples (112 lefties faced, 136 righties). So it’s not just a bunch of hanging sliders to lefties.

Let’s try and blame a pitch. Maybe one of these is worse than the others.

That one really leaps off the page at you, huh? The changeup! He’s never given up a home run on the changeup before this year. He’s given up… (scans the page)… two this year! Take those two homers out and he’s giving up 1.5 homers per nine. Huh. Even though he hasn’t trusted his change as much this year, that can’t be it.

Command still seems important here. If only it weren’t the hardest thing to quantify. Bill Petti’s Edge% shows that, currently, Pineda is throwing fewer balls in the heart of the zone than ever before. But his overall zone percentage is also the lowest he’s ever recorded, so he’s throwing more non-competitive pitches.

How about hanging breaking balls? I developed a few measures to try and quantify breaking-ball command for The Hardball Times Annual last year. I looked at average height in the strike zone and average drop for curve balls in one-strike counts. In those counts, pitchers most likely want a swing and a miss, so it seems most fair to judge those breaking balls by how low in the zone they cross the plate, and how much drop they have.

Average Movement and Location for Michael Pineda’s Sliders
Year Average Height Average Drop
2015 1.87 0.62
2016 1.55 0.89
Drop given in inches, location in feet, and both only in one-strike counts against right-handers. Standard deviations for height in ’15 and ’16 (.727 and .789) and movement (1.74 and 1.47) similar in both cases.

Pineda’s slider is the tiniest bit flat this year. But he’s also burying them, nearly a full four inches lower on average. There’s no smoking gun here.

If it’s not one pitch, perhaps it’s all of them? Strangely, Pineda’s vertical release point is the highest of his career and he’s seeing the worst drop of his career on all of his pitches. Maybe not so strangely — we know there’s a relationship between arm angle and rise, so basically he’s getting more rise on his pitches, and it’s not working out to his advantage. He did lose some cut on his breaking pitches, but has righted the ship on that front to some extent.

Is it something we can see with our eyes? Here’s a still upon (fastball) release from last year (left) and this year (right). Doesn’t seem very different.

Pineda1516

To sum up so far, Pineda’s relationship of strikeouts to walks is about the same as it’s been previously in his career. That relationship is in good shape. He’s been getting spanked on balls in play, and subjectively, the command looks off, but none of our metrics for command tells us much. His breaking ball is moving about the same as usual and crossing the plate lower than usual, and he’s missing the heart of the plate more than usual, not the sort of indicators you normally associate with poor command.

What we can say is that he’s not getting the ball in the zone as much, his arm angle is a little different, and his stuff is the tiniest bit flat this year. Looking at the non-competitive pitches — a pitch more than 2.5 feet from the center of the zone per the working definition August Fagerstrom used for a post this past November — he’s throwing 1.8% of his pitches in the non-competitive zone, mostly on the plate or in the dirt this year, compared to 1.0% last year.

So yeah, the sliders are a bit flat and he’s burying too many of his pitches in the dirt. This sounds a lot like what we discussed last week with Matt Harvey.

There’s no indication that any of these things are flaws Pineda can’t correct. As much as it seems impossible, the facts remain that Pineda is still getting the whiffs, not walking the ballpark, and not showing signs of injury. It might even be a matter of confidence — get hit around a little and you will probably finish some of your sliders so hard that they bounce on the plate. Whatever it is, the fix will probably be less drastic than the (seeming) problems.

We hoped you liked reading What’s Going On, Michael Pineda? by Eno Sarris!

Please support FanGraphs by becoming a member. We publish thousands of articles a year, host multiple podcasts, and have an ever growing database of baseball stats.

FanGraphs does not have a paywall. With your membership, we can continue to offer the content you've come to rely on and add to our unique baseball coverage.

Support FanGraphs




With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

newest oldest most voted
Dolemite
Member
Dolemite

As a season long Pineda holder in fantasy, this has been a true test of believing in the advanced metrics and looking results square in the face, screaming “HES SO MUCH BETTER THAN HIS RESULTS INDICATE!!!”

I am pleased to find that the more scrutiny he gets, noone can find the “smoking gun” to his horrible results. He gets whiffs and doesn’t walk a lot. He has the 2 “underperformance 101” marks of a low LOB% and a sky high BABIP. The only thing I find that concerns me is his avg exit velocity and vertical angle are much worse this year. Per the xOba sheet that Andrew P. puts out, 2015 Pineda had an avg exit vel of 88.1 w an avg vertical angle of 6.5. 2016 pineda has an avg exit vel of 91.4 with an avg vertical angle of 11.2.

This reminds me of Brandon Mccarthy last year (whom I also owned). Great stuff. Great periphs, but when he gets hit, they go for damage. I remember Mike Pod beating his fist on the table last year that McCarthy was merely unlucky and HR/FB wasn’t a skill. I wonder if there is a major difference between Pineda 2016 and McCarthy 2015 that I am missing, or if both are the same type of player. If the same, the million dollar question is luck or variable unaccounted for in all advanced stats modeling of how pitching should go.

Dolemite
Member
Dolemite

Looking at his pitch values, his FB is getting crushed. Is he not pitching it high enough?

2015 FF averages
Velocity 93.35
Spin Rate 1409
pfx_x x pfx_z -1.65 x 6.7
pz 2.63

2016 FF averages
Velocity 93.74 (Faster)
Spin Rate 1811 (Lot more spin)
pfx_x x pfx_z -2.45 x 8.55 (More fade and rise)
pz 2.34 (lower in the zone) (Is THIS the problem? a fastball like his with good spin and rise should be high in the zone as this site CONSTANTLY advocates)

Daniel Steinberg
Member
Member
Daniel Steinberg

Where are you getting these pz numbers and what does pz stand for?

Dolemite
Member
Dolemite

https://fastballs.wordpress.com/2007/08/02/glossary-of-the-gameday-pitch-fields/

baseball savant was where I was pulling the pitchfx data from