Where Does Colby Lewis’ Non-K Game Rank?

Pitchers can succeed without striking batters out, but a failure to whiff shifts more of the burden to the defense. Based on what we know about pitchers and their controllable skills, limiting the number of balls in play increases the likelihood of a good outing. Strikeouts might not guarantee an out due to the dropped third strike rule, but they result in outs virtually 99 percent of the time.

Successful pitching lines lacking strikeouts are strange to the eyes. They’re even stranger when high-strikeout hurlers post them. You’d think a pitcher like Colby Lewis could easily record one punchout in seven innings of work, but in a May 10 start, he held the Athletics to one run over 7 1/3 innings. And he didn’t record a strikeout.

In honor of Lewis’ odd line — 7 1/3 IP, 5 H, 1 R, 1 BB, 0 K — I decided to research two items: the best non-strikeout games in the Retrosheet era, and the highest percentage of non-strikeout starts in a season.

The Best Non-K Games
The first step in evaluating the best non-strikeout games is determining the stat to use. I went with game score, a toy created by Bill James that gauges a starting pitcher’s performance based on his line. It isn’t an end-all metric by any stretch, but it’s usually a decent proxy and, like WPA, tends to tells a pretty accurate game story. A score of 50 equates to an average start. The average game score (GSC) for non-strikeout games is 34, well below what is considered to be an average outing.

Lewis recorded a 63 GSC in his strikeout-less outing, which is funny when compared to his previous start: He posted a 64 GSC on May 5 while striking out 11 hitters.

Is his 63 GSC on the high end of non-strikeout games?

According to Retrosheet it isn’t even close. Since 1950, there have been 18 games in which a pitcher finished with an 80+ GSC while failing to strike out a single batter. Given the game score formula, the maximum in a nine-inning game is 87, so the pitchers below came as close as possible to maxing out without achieving the highest score.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members

Ken Holtzman, 8/19/1969: 84 GSC, 9 IP-0 H-0 R-3 BB-0 K
Neil Allen, 7/20/1986: 83 GSC, 9 IP-2 H-0 R-0 BB-0 K
Barry Moore, 4/30/1967: 83 GSC, 9 IP-1 H-0 R-2 BB-0 K
Paul Minner, 7/1/1951: 82 GSC, 9 IP-2 H-0 R-1 BB-0 K
Doyle Alexander, 9/2/1984: 82 GSC, 9 IP-2 H-0 R-1 BB-0 K
Frank Lary, 8/3/1955: 82 GSC, 9 IP-2 H-0 R-1 BB-0 K

Holtzman’s game, in case you missed it, was a no-hitter without a single strikeout.

Highest Non-K %
The pitchers below posted the highest percentage of starts without a strikeout in a season, while making at least 25 starts: no, two K-less games in two starts doesn’t count!

Ed Lynch 1983: 10/27, 37%
Jim Hearn 1951: 10/29, 34%
Bob Shaw 1960: 10/32, 31%
Tommy John 1984: 9/29, 31%
Dave Schmidt 1989: 8/28, 30%

What about in the post-strike wild card era?

Nate Cornejo 2003: 9/32, 28%
Kirk Rueter 2003: 7/27, 26%
Kirk Saarloos 2005: 6/27, 22%
Bob Wolcott 1996: 6/28, 21%
Scott Erickson 2002: 6/28, 21%
Mark Redman 2006: 6/29, 20%
Steve Trachsel 2007: 6/29, 20%

Colby Lewis might have posted a strange line, but his game was far from the best non-strikeout start in history. Pitchers with Lewis’ high strikeout rate don’t produce multiple K-less games, so don’t expect to see him  listed among the pitchers on those last two lists when this research is inevitably updated.





Eric is an accountant and statistical analyst from Philadelphia. He also covers the Phillies at Phillies Nation and can be found here on Twitter.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
johngomes
15 years ago

the real $$$ question is where does his slider rank amongst starting pitchers in terms of nassssstaaay

anon
15 years ago
Reply to  johngomes

13th among starters who’ve thrown their slidepiece over 100 times, 21st overall.

http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=all&qual=y&type=7&season=2011&month=0&season1=2011&ind=0

Ryan
15 years ago

Tom Glavine had a complete game no-strikeout no-walk performance on 79 pitches.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/ATL/ATL199306150.shtml

MikeM
15 years ago

Two Kirks on that list. A four-letter name with two “K’s” in it, good for a K% of 50%.

gdc
15 years ago
Reply to  MikeM

The opposite of Lewis with 0 K was probably Saarloos whiffing 11 in 5 IP
http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/2006/B09190OAK2006.htm
Gave up 8 hits and 2 runs trailing 2-1, fortunately that Cliff Lee guy let him off the hook by giving up a salami to Bobby Kielty.
Los Kirk had 16 starts that year and only two with more than 3 K, the other being a 5 K game his other start against Cleveland, so that 11 K was as much as his next best three games combined.

Yirmiyahu
15 years ago

Hate to be serious, because this is a fun post.

But it’s not really fair to Lewis to compare his game to K-less games going back to 1950. Over the time period you’re dealing with, K rate has steadily increased from 4.00ish to 7.00ish, and BABIP has steadily increased from .275ish to .300ish (but has fallen off over the last 2 years).

Getting guys out on balls-in-play used to be a lot more common, and Colby Lewis’ game is much more impressive considering the era.

Barkey Walker
15 years ago

“limiting the number of balls in play increases the likelihood of a good outing” yet FIP does not take this into account. Yes, recording Ks and BB does do something, but when there is a ball in play, if it is an out, then there are fewer chances for the pitcher to get a K (or HR or freep), when it is a hit, then there are more chances to get these FIP modifiers.

Victor
15 years ago
Reply to  Barkey Walker

You know what FIP stands for right? You make it sound like they unintentionally ignore balls in play (aka. fielding).

Barkey Walker
15 years ago
Reply to  Victor

The point is that FIP is not fielding independent.

Two situations:

situation 1, a pitcher has three plate appearances, each batter puts a ball in play. Each batter gets called out.

situation 2, a pitcher has four plate appearances, in the first three the batter puts the ball in play, but the batter gets on in one of the three. Then, the pitcher gets out the fourth batter (could be a K, could be a ball in play).

In one situation, the pitcher had three chances for BB, HR, and K, the other had four chances. Fielding is very present in the denominator (though not the numerator).

RC
15 years ago
Reply to  Victor

FIP’s denominator is almost entirely dependant on BABIP. FIP is no more “fielding independant” than ERA is. Its just normalized to league average.

Old Rungo
15 years ago

Don’t think Jeff Barry was a pitcher… I may be mistaken as I’m new to this, but he looks like an OF.
Thanks