Which Team Has MLB’s Best Double-Play Combo?
These days, we’re blessed with a number of amazing young shortstops. Carlos Correa, Francisco Lindor, and Corey Seager, for example, are already among baseball’s top players. Manny Machado is a shortstop who just accidentally plays third base. All of them are younger than 25.
Second base isn’t as notable for its youth. Last year, however, second basemen recorded one of the top collective offensive lines at the position in the history of the game. Good job, second basemen.
So both positions are experiencing a bit of a renaissance at the moment. This led me to wonder which teams might be benefiting most from that renaissance. It’s rare that teams can keep a second baseman and shortstop together long enough to form a lasting and effective double-play combo. Right now, MLB has some pretty great ones. But which is the greatest — particularly, on the defensive side of thing? Let’s explore.
First, we want to know who has played together for awhile. Since the start of the 2015 season, 21 players have played at least 200 games as a shortstop, and 23 have done the same at second base. Cross-referencing them and weeding out the players who have played for multiple teams, we get the following list:
| Team | Second Baseman | G | Shortstop | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAL | Jonathan Schoop | 281 | J.J. Hardy | 264 |
| BOS | Dustin Pedroia | 279 | Xander Bogaerts | 346 |
| CLE | Jason Kipnis | 297 | Francisco Lindor | 290 |
| DET | Ian Kinsler | 335 | Jose Iglesias | 279 |
| HOU | Jose Altuve | 338 | Carlos Correa | 288 |
| MIA | Dee Gordon | 257 | Adeiny Hechavarria | 288 |
| PHI | Cesar Hernandez | 270 | Freddy Galvis | 339 |
| SF | Joe Panik | 257 | Brandon Crawford | 315 |
| TEX | Rougned Odor | 300 | Elvis Andrus | 347 |
That’s a pretty good list. There are some tough omissions here. The most notable is the Angels, as Andrelton Simmons hasn’t been with them long enough to meet our bar here. Given Johnny Giavotella’s defensive contributions, however, we can guess that the combo here would be quite one-sided. Also excluded are teams with new double-play combos, like the Dodgers and Mariners. Not only are the Logan Forsythe-Corey Seager and Robinson Cano–Jean Segura combos new this season, but thanks to injuries they haven’t even played together much this season. Cano-Segura has only happened 22 times this season, and Forsythe-Seager only 10 times.
Another team this excludes is the Cubs, who would have a decent shot at the crown given Addison Russell’s play at shortstop. But since Javier Baez and Ben Zobrist split time there, neither of them have played even 150 games in this timeframe. I could combine them, but then that would be grading double play trios and not double play combos. Sorry, Cubs fans.
Let’s press on with these nine squads. How do they stack up defensively?
| Team | 2B/SS | Innings | rGDP | DRS | FSR | DPR | RngR | ErrR | UZR | UZR/150 | Def |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAL | Schoop/Hardy | 4,788.0 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 16.0 | 5.5 | -12.7 | 15.7 | 8.5 | 2.4 | 24.7 |
| BOS | Pedroia/Bogaerts | 5,467.0 | -6.0 | -9.0 | 19.0 | -1.8 | 3.2 | 13.0 | 14.4 | 3.6 | 34.3 |
| CLE | Kipnis/Lindor | 5,152.9 | -5.0 | 31.0 | 20.0 | -0.9 | 40.5 | 2.9 | 42.5 | 11.1 | 60.2 |
| DET | Kinsler/Iglesias | 5,363.7 | 9.0 | 42.0 | 36.0 | 6.2 | 17.4 | 10.8 | 34.3 | 8.6 | 51.9 |
| HOU | Altuve/Correa | 5,535.0 | 2.0 | -4.0 | 16.0 | -4.2 | -2.7 | -4.6 | -11.4 | -2.8 | 6.8 |
| MIA | Gordon/Hech. | 4,735.7 | -1.0 | 31.0 | 28.0 | 3.4 | 18.2 | 13.7 | 35.2 | 10.0 | 51.8 |
| PHI | Hern./Galvis | 5,199.7 | 3.0 | 1.0 | -7.0 | 1.0 | 22.4 | 6.8 | 30.2 | 7.8 | 49.1 |
| SF | Panik/Crawford | 5,000.3 | 2.0 | 49.0 | 51.0 | 3.8 | 32.5 | 13.0 | 49.2 | 13.3 | 67.2 |
| TEX | Odor/Andrus | 5,716.3 | 3.0 | -17.0 | 5.0 | 3.7 | -19.9 | -13.0 | -29.3 | -6.9 | -8.9 |
I put this table in alphabetical order so as to not bias the table with the rankings of any one particular stat. The reason is that this is open to debate. Should we judge the best double play combo literally — i.e. how they actually turn the double play? If so, then rGDP and DPR are the stats you want to use. There’s a positive consensus coalescing around Baltimore and Detroit there, and a negative consensus around Boston and Cleveland.
But perhaps you don’t think of it like that. Perhaps you think of an effective double-play combo simply as the middle infielders who play the best overall defense. I think this is a reasonable position, as well. On that score, there are plenty of strong contenders, led by San Francisco and Cleveland. On a rate basis, Miami deserves to be in the conversation, though they have played the fewest total innings the past two years.
Something else to consider is whether you think it’s more important to have two strong defenders or are comfortable with one really great defender and one mediocre defender. I didn’t break this out for readers because I think the stats of the duo combined are more telling here, but if you want to single them out, I couldn’t tell you that you were wrong.
Perhaps you don’t even think defense should be the driver, and you prefer to look at WAR. If that’s your thought process, it’s a two-team race between Cleveland and Houston — both of their combos have been worth 22 WAR and change since the start of 2015. By WAR, Houston could have the best DP combo in history if they play together for long enough, but I’m not sure WAR is how this should be measured.
Six years ago, when I conducted this exercise, I gave you a definitive answer. Today, I am more in touch with the democratic values of our society, so I put it to you: who do you think is the league’s best double-play combo?
You don’t have to choose. But if you do choose, please choose wisely.
Paul Swydan used to be the managing editor of The Hardball Times, a writer and editor for FanGraphs and a writer for Boston.com and The Boston Globe. Now, he owns The Silver Unicorn Bookstore, an independent bookstore in Acton, Mass. Follow him on Twitter @Swydan. Follow the store @SilUnicornActon.
Cubs fan; Baez (11 DRS in 2016 across 59 games) & Russell (19 DRS). Since they didn’t fit your criteria, though, I voted for Panik & Crawford. Not especially flashy, but very solid and glove-sured.
They make the difficult look easy. Crawford’s arm is phenomenal.
Even more impressive, Russell/Baez have a combined 50 DRS since 2015 despite Russell with only 244 games at SS and Baez with only 108.
How about them Padres!!! Aybar-Solarte FTW amirite? :trollface:
Panik and Crawford should get extra credit for this play from 2014: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdNZb7XRlL0
I was wavering because I couldn’t bring myself to vote against Lindor/Kipnis but you just sold me. It’s not a double play but the style points put it over the top. That’s like that insane play Iglesias made a couple years ago right after he was traded to the Tigers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ui8yhI6eYX8
Actually it *was* a double play. The Giants asked for a review and the batter (Hosmer) was ruled out as well.
Even better.
It was a nice play, but if Hosmer goes in standing up and doesn’t slide, it’s no double play. It’s amazing to me how many times I see major leaguers do this. It SLOWS YOU DOWN AND increases injury risk. The odds of it helping you avoid a tag play do not make up for these other disadvantages
Wow, it’s like the Correa/Altuve voters never bothered to look at the chart. From just watching them, I figured that Lindor/Kipnis would be one of the better duos, but man, Crawford and Panik not only have the most 1st place finishes, but they don’t have a single negative across the board! If SF wasn’t so depressing to watch right now, I’d start tuning in more frequently.
No, it’s like the Correa/Altuve voters prefer to include offensive production
But….the article is all about turning double plays in the field.
“Perhaps you don’t even think defense should be the driver, and you prefer to look at WAR. If that’s your thought process, it’s a two-team race between Cleveland and Houston — both of their combos have been worth 22 WAR and change since the start of 2015.”
– The article
Yeah but I think the title of the article should change then so that it is something like best Middle Infield combo then instead of DP combo. Picking nits here but this seems like it should be about defense.
Not to mention that the article was also specific enough to include a chart of eligible duos’ defensive metrics and left out offense completely.
Voting for Correa/Altuve is like voting to give Jeter a Gold Glove back in 2005
I read the term “best double play combo” as “best players at 2B/SS” and not “best defenders at 2B/SS”. Which I suppose means I disagree with the default stance of the majority of the article as it’s presented.
yeah if……sigh
Paul, love the column but it is almost baseball blasphemy to put the 2B on the left side of the table, or to list the second baseman before the shortstops.
I did it that way because 2B is 4 and SS is 6. Have a great weekend.
The shortstop is always supposed to be the last listed infielder.
How does a team’s tendency to employ shifts affect these numbers? My understanding is that data from plays where a shift is employed are thrown out. If this is the case than these numbers should be controlled for opportunities since the comparison should be done on a per opportunity basis.
If you are going by WAR and not just defense I would bet on Washington being near the top of the list by the end of the season.
So you’re banking on Bryce Harper making a smooth transition to shortstop?
You’re right, I should have mentioned them.
A
It’s too bad the threshold is just high enough to exclude seager/utley, I’d have been interested to see where they fall even if I wouldn’t vote for them.
Alcides Escobar, Omar Infante
Russell/Baez. Screw innings limits.
Over the seasons where they were the everyday double play combo for the Tigers (1978-1991), Lou Whitaker (+88) and Alan Trammell (+91) were 179 runs above average defensively at their positions, roughly +14 runs per season.
They also each averaged over 10 runs above the MLB average (all positions) over that period (Whitaker +145, Trammell +136)
Is anyone aware of any research on what % of double-plays are of what variety? 6-4-3 vs 5-4-3 vs 4-6-3, etc.
Only 4 finalists in this game, given the table: BAL, CLE, DET, SF. It strike anyone else as odd that the overall best DEF stats don’t lead to the best DP stats? Maybe I don’t understand the numbers right, but how can Kipnis and Lindor have negative DP values? Panik and Crawford are more pedestrian at the DP but have fantastic overall values. Strange.
I voted for the SF duo and would rate BAL 2nd.