With Brandon Belt Down and Out, What Will Giants Do at First Base?
Brandon Belt has had his fair share of freak injuries throughout his career; Monday evening brought news of yet another, as an X-ray on his thumb revealed a fracture that occurred Sunday afternoon when he was hit on the hand when squaring around to bunt against Rockies reliever Lucas Gilbreath. Some may question why Belt was bunting in the first place, but he sadly has a history of being on the wrong end of poorly thrown baseballs. Also, bunting has long been a tactic he’s successfully used as a heavily shifted upon hitter.
When it comes to Belt, you don’t often have to search for analogous injuries from around the league to get a sense of a timeline, because a similar injury has probably already happened to Belt himself. In fact, this exact same scenario is a repeat: In 2014, he was hit by a pitch and missed eight weeks with a fracture in his thumb. Recovery time from this latest injury is officially unknown, and a timetable will come out soon, but it’s possible if not likely that the Giants will be without Belt for the rest of the year.
That would be a huge loss for San Francisco. Not only has Belt been the team’s best hitter since the start of last season, but he’s also been one of the best in all of baseball over that span:
| Player | PA | Avg. | OBP | SLG | wRC+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Soto | 822 | 0.328 | 0.475 | 0.586 | 176 |
| Bryce Harper | 820 | 0.300 | 0.43 | 0.598 | 166 |
| Brandon Belt | 560 | 0.285 | 0.393 | 0.595 | 163 |
| Ronald Acuña Jr. | 562 | 0.271 | 0.399 | 0.591 | 157 |
| Fernando Tatis Jr. | 782 | 0.282 | 0.368 | 0.602 | 156 |
Throughout his prime, Belt was always a great hitter (a 136 wRC+ from 2013 to ’16), but his lack of homers and his injury history made him a rather contentious figure among Giants fans. When his production wavered from 2017 to ’19 (107 wRC+), like most of the team’s core, it seemed that the best was behind him. But as you saw in that chart, he has reached unforeseen heights thanks to a new diet of home runs that has his isolated slugging (ISO) at a career-high .323, up alongside the game’s best sluggers.
It’s no surprise that Belt’s revival coincides with the start of 2020, as that’s when the Giants revamped their coaching staff and moved in the outfield fences at Oracle Park by eight feet, with a new trio of hitting coaches preaching a team-wide philosophy based on only swinging at pitches that you can truly damage. Belt has always had the plate discipline part down, routinely putting up some of the best O-Swing Rates in baseball (94th percentile this year). In fact, since 2016, no hitter has struck out looking on pitches out of the zone more often than he has. He doesn’t chase pitches, even if umpires do.
Now, on top of the discipline, he’s damaging the hittable pitches even more, with this improved power and approach leading to a career-high 29 home runs. (In fact, he had never even reached 20 homers before this season.) Power has been so hard to come by in recent years for the Giants that Belt’s 29 homers are the most in a season for the team since Barry Bonds hit 45 in 2004.
Belt has always been good at keeping the ball off the ground, and this year is no different, as he has a 50% fly-ball rate, the highest of his career, paired with the lowest ground-ball rate in the majors. He’s made the most of his fly balls this year, too:
| Year | EV | wOBA | ISO | Pull% | HR/FB% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 93.0 | 0.491 | 0.584 | 21.5 | 13.6 |
| 2016 | 92.0 | 0.321 | 0.417 | 17.6 | 9.3 |
| 2017 | 93.3 | 0.478 | 0.674 | 22.2 | 14.1 |
| 2018 | 91.5 | 0.419 | 0.485 | 23.3 | 10.3 |
| 2019 | 91.7 | 0.362 | 0.435 | 25.9 | 8.8 |
| 2020 | 91.2 | 0.433 | 0.455 | 24.2 | 19.1 |
| 2021 | 95.0 | 0.725 | 0.978 | 33.3 | 26.9 |
| Career Average | 92.5 | 0.456 | 0.564 | 25.3 | 12.6 |
The spikes in wOBA and ISO are big improvements on their own, but when you notice how often he is pulling his fly balls, it becomes clear where his power breakout is coming from.
So how do you replace that? The Giants have a deep and talented lineup — the best in the National League — and have survived and thrived without key players all season, but losing Belt, who had a 207 wRC+ in September, feels like the toughest blow yet. This isn’t the first time this year they’ve had to go on without him, though, as a knee injury kept him out for six weeks earlier in the season, so we certainly have a better idea about how Gabe Kapler will approach the loss this time around.
The Giants went 20–14 without Belt earlier in the year, which somehow is one of their worst stretches of the year. The relatively pedestrian performance was not the fault of his replacements, though. LaMonte Wade Jr. and Darin Ruf both filled in at first base with resounding success — a 145 wRC+ for the former and an absurd 175 wRC+ for the latter. The problem right now is that Ruf is currently dealing with a minor oblique injury, though it seems likely he’ll be back before the postseason starts.
If you are a frequent reader of FanGraphs, you may already be familiar with these two players and the breakouts they have had this year. Just last week, Jay Jaffe wrote all about Wade and his success in high-leverage moments:
Wade’s splits, small sample though they may be, are just ridiculous, the stuff of cartoon superheroes. He’s hit .375/.413/.696 in 124 PA with men on base (but just .208/.307/.416 with the bases empty), .379/.408/.652 in 71 PA with runners in scoring position, .356/.442/.511 in 52 PA in close-and-late situations, .412/.426/.667 in 56 PA in high-leverage situations, and .423/.483/.923 in 29 PA with two outs and runners in scoring position.
As good as Wade has been, he’s largely only in the lineups against righties; he has 41 plate appearances and a 0 wRC+ against southpaws. This is where Ruf and his 164 wRC+ against lefties comes in. Earlier this month, Devan Fink wrote about his elite plate discipline, like his very low Swing%:
This tendency gets him into more favorable counts more often, with more than 31% of the pitches he’s seen this season coming while ahead in the count, a 91st percentile mark. That’s by far the highest rate of his career.
Ruf is more than just a lefty masher, though. He’s played a lot against righties this year (164 PA) and more than held his own (125 wRC+). That figure is good for sixth best on the team versus right-handers, more than enough to be earning starts against them in the postseason. As far as replacements go, you could do a lot worse than those two.
I have a feeling we may see both Wade and Ruf start against righties, with the former in a corner outfield spot, where he has more experience than Ruf, and the latter at first base. The right-handed hitting Wilmer Flores is another option at first, especially until Ruf returns; his 118 career wRC+ against lefties and a career-high walk rate have earned him plenty of playing time this season.
Regardless of whether he returns in October, Belt’s contract is up after this season, so he very well could have played his final game in a Giants uniform. His performance the last two years couldn’t have come at a better time; he’s more than earned himself a multi-year contract, even if he’s turning 34 next April. He’s been a huge part of why the Giants have baseball’s best record heading into the final week of the season, and his tenure and leadership role on this team will likely have both sides eager to work out a contract, even if he doesn’t take another at-bat this season.
Luke Hooper is a designer and writer at FanGraphs. He lives in Portland, Oregon, longing for a major league team to materialize.
There’s no way the Giants don’t re-sign him, is there?
There’s a possibility that they don’t find agreement if Belt prefers to play in a more hitter-friendly environment on a short-term deal, which the Giants will likely offer due to his injury history. Belt’s an outstanding hitter — and an AL team that can deploy him at DH might consider him more valuable than the Giants do, who prioritize positional flexibility in addition to selectivity at the plate. The Giants could choose to reroute those resources to bring in more compelling SPs or a player with more positional flexibility, like Corey Seager.
I’d think they would QO him (I assume he hasn’t been QOed previously, but could be wrong) and honestly it might hamper his potential market enough that he would consider taking it. Would be very interesting to see the relative markets for him and Rizzo.
He’s never been a free agent, so there’s no chance he could have been QO’d previously. If the Giants want him back, they’ll absolutely QO him. For starters, Rizzo and Freeman will also be on the market. Rizzo doesn’t come with a QO, and Freeman is also Freddie Freeman. So Belt might be inclined to accept a 1-year deal to return.
If they QO him I think there’s about a 99% Belt takes it. I’m not sure whether that means they should offer it to him or they shouldn’t, but I’m leaning towards “shouldn’t–they can probably get him at two years at a lower AAV.
Considering his age and injury history, I’d think that AAV would need to be significantly lower or I’d rather just have the one year commitment.
He is much better than Rizzo tho. And I know he likely won’t have the biggest market, but he has been an elite hitter for a while now, and I think is a true talent 130+ guy at minimum, which is something you can say about only a handful of guys in the MLB.
I’m not sure why you would think that Belt, at a minimum, is a true talent 130+ wRC player going into his age 34 season, with a career 126 wRC+. At a minimum? To me, the minimum is that he can’t replicate his success of 2020-21 (less than one full season of plate appearances), so he’s basically the 2017-19 version of Belt, but now older.
Even truly elite first baseman are a risky proposition when already solidly mid-thirties. Rizzo has had an extremely troubling 2020-21, but he’s younger and prior to 2020 had a much, much better career than Belt. It’s not hard to imagine some teams buying into a resurgence from the previously better and still younger player.
You are right, at a minimum was wrong. I would take the over on his roster projection of 129 for next year, though. And I wouldn’t say Rizzo has had a much better career either. 26 war in 1200 games is about the same as 31 war in 1400 games (just looked so apx numbers on phone)and I would weigh what is done recently vs what has been done over course of career for future performance. To me if Belt had been healthy he’d have had every much as good of a career that Rizzo has had.
I agree. Without injuries and park difference, Belt’s career numbers would be closer to Rizzo. They’re a bit different in that Rizzo doesn’t strike out as much, but for many years they had roughly the same xwOBA. Also while Rizzo shows up as 2 yrs. younger, he’s only 16 mos. younger I believe. Oh and even though Belt was down for 2017-2019, a lot of that was 2nd half of 2018 after a knee injury and bad luck in 2019 (so many doubles/deep outs at Oracle). I think Giants will give him the QO and then maybe do a 2 year deal similar to Crawford’s.
Everyone is better when you make exceptions. You might’ve right, but you also might be wrong. It’ll be very interesting and we’ll likely know in a years time.
probably a better career as injuries do sap your ability to hit over time.
The old giants might not have, wanting to use the 1B and DH spots to keep posey fresh. The new plan had been to rest posey entirely so those 1B and DH bats are fair game. You gotta think the GM wants to use those spots for scrap heap/ cheap reclamation projects. Or is that what belt is now?
I’d be surprised if he got an offer higher than the one from the giants though. (Obviously I’ve assumed the DH comes to NL next year. Please. )
LWJ/Ruf is the easy answer. I think a big issue that comes with that is the team’s outstanding versatility takes a hit. The Giants have done an incredible job utilizing their entire roster and we’ve seen the extra value they’ve gotten through pinch hitters, defensive subs, etc. You can find some comfort by comparing the combined wRC+ of LWJ/Ruf to Belt, but the way it forces the Giants to ‘change the recipe” in terms of what moves can be made is something that shouldn’t be minimized.
I definitely feel for Belt. Dude has battled injuries for years and has fought through a lot of ups and downs. Hasn’t sniffed the postseason since 2016 and goes down right at the finish line. Brutal. Compounded by his impending free agency. I’d love to see him back in SF short term deal (especially with a likely DH in 2022) but I think some team will ultimately pay up. Much love to the captain
The QO has a huge potential to hurt his free agency. Teams won’t want to jump in until Rizzo and Freeman’s markets settle, and I could see Belt wanting to get something done early on.
I think Belt might have a larger free agent market than Rizzo.
If he doesn’t have a QO attached, possibly.
I think Belt would very much like to stay in SF. He’s obviously flourished under Kapler and the new coaching staff and by all accounts is a major positive force in the clubhouse. The team supports his hitting approach, which has not always been the case in his career. And moving the fences in has at least made Oracle not *quite* as hostile to left-handed power hitters.
I am certain he would give the Giants a hometown discount, and I hope they treat him with appropriate respect.
People change as they get older. He is now the self declared leader of the team. I remember back in the day, when they were winning there were always reports of him being bullied by Posey and a few other guys because he was an easy target. I’m glad to see he has taken a leadership role. People often downplay how important that is in organizations but it really is a big thing. Games are not always won and lost by things that can be quantified by advanced stats, and that is a good thing.
“Darin Run” is probably the most antifreudian slip you could’ve gone with. Gotta love the lug.
I cannot remember what the injury replacement rules are now, are Tom and Nogowski categorically ineligible for the postseason? Not that I’m sure they’re The Answers, but at this point, I don’t think I have any coherent expectations for anyone Zaidi signs.
They weren’t on the Giants 40-man roster as of September 1st, so I believe they aren’t eligible.
Then again, it’s not like they *need* either of them.
Ahh–so even 60-day DLs (which, knock on wood, won’t be Belt) don’t let you squeeze around the September lock?
Anyway, a Flores/Wade or Bryant/Wade platoon gets the job done at first in the short run, but that gives Slater/Duggar/Dickerson more run than I’d like to see. They’re not the deepest darkest lineup holes, but it sure was nice when there were no holes at all.
Per the MLB website:
“A player who doesn’t meet said criteria for postseason eligibility can still be added to a team’s roster in the postseason via petition to the Commissioner’s Office if the player was in the organization on Aug. 31 and is replacing someone who is on the injured list and has served the minimum amount of time required for activation…. Players who are acquired in September or after are ineligible.”
So the Giants could, realistically, petition to add Heliot Ramos or Mike Tauchman or someone else to the roster, but Nogowski & Tom, because they were acquired in September would be out.
Ha! Fixed it, thanks!
Why is no one talking about the fact that there is almost certainly going to be a work stoppage? I don’t see teams handing out big contracts (or even QOs) with that looming.
I think the readership at Fangraphs has strong hope the work stoppage does not happen and would rathe talk about other things at this point in the season. Millionaires versus billionaires is not a fun conversation for someone buying the tickets that pay those incomes while struggling to pay their own bills.
Just because it totally definitely should be said:
– Millionaires vs billionaires is a slaughter for the latter
– It’s more accurately millionaires vs billionaires and their various serfdoms
– The billionaires couldn’t care less about how many tickets are sold anymore. The money is in the access to public funds, tax breaks, real estate, and TV deals
Even if there is a work stoppage (which isn’t that likely at all), transactions can still be made as usual like they were during the ’94-’95 strike. Besides, teams still have to make their offseason moves with the anticipation that an agreement will still be made, even in the absence of a current CBA as they did during the ’93-’94 offseason despite what ultimately happened.
Qualifying offers in particular will still be made, as those decisions are due before the CBA even expires.