With Brandon Belt Down and Out, What Will Giants Do at First Base?

Brandon Belt has had his fair share of freak injuries throughout his career; Monday evening brought news of yet another, as an X-ray on his thumb revealed a fracture that occurred Sunday afternoon when he was hit on the hand when squaring around to bunt against Rockies reliever Lucas Gilbreath. Some may question why Belt was bunting in the first place, but he sadly has a history of being on the wrong end of poorly thrown baseballs. Also, bunting has long been a tactic he’s successfully used as a heavily shifted upon hitter.

When it comes to Belt, you don’t often have to search for analogous injuries from around the league to get a sense of a timeline, because a similar injury has probably already happened to Belt himself. In fact, this exact same scenario is a repeat: In 2014, he was hit by a pitch and missed eight weeks with a fracture in his thumb. Recovery time from this latest injury is officially unknown, and a timetable will come out soon, but it’s possible if not likely that the Giants will be without Belt for the rest of the year.

That would be a huge loss for San Francisco. Not only has Belt been the team’s best hitter since the start of last season, but he’s also been one of the best in all of baseball over that span:

Top 5 wRC+ (2020-2021)
Player PA Avg. OBP SLG wRC+
Juan Soto 822 0.328 0.475 0.586 176
Bryce Harper 820 0.300 0.43 0.598 166
Brandon Belt 560 0.285 0.393 0.595 163
Ronald Acuña Jr. 562 0.271 0.399 0.591 157
Fernando Tatis Jr. 782 0.282 0.368 0.602 156
Min. 500 PA

Throughout his prime, Belt was always a great hitter (a 136 wRC+ from 2013 to ’16), but his lack of homers and his injury history made him a rather contentious figure among Giants fans. When his production wavered from 2017 to ’19 (107 wRC+), like most of the team’s core, it seemed that the best was behind him. But as you saw in that chart, he has reached unforeseen heights thanks to a new diet of home runs that has his isolated slugging (ISO) at a career-high .323, up alongside the game’s best sluggers.

It’s no surprise that Belt’s revival coincides with the start of 2020, as that’s when the Giants revamped their coaching staff and moved in the outfield fences at Oracle Park by eight feet, with a new trio of hitting coaches preaching a team-wide philosophy based on only swinging at pitches that you can truly damage. Belt has always had the plate discipline part down, routinely putting up some of the best O-Swing Rates in baseball (94th percentile this year). In fact, since 2016, no hitter has struck out looking on pitches out of the zone more often than he has. He doesn’t chase pitches, even if umpires do.

Now, on top of the discipline, he’s damaging the hittable pitches even more, with this improved power and approach leading to a career-high 29 home runs. (In fact, he had never even reached 20 homers before this season.) Power has been so hard to come by in recent years for the Giants that Belt’s 29 homers are the most in a season for the team since Barry Bonds hit 45 in 2004.

Belt has always been good at keeping the ball off the ground, and this year is no different, as he has a 50% fly-ball rate, the highest of his career, paired with the lowest ground-ball rate in the majors. He’s made the most of his fly balls this year, too:

Performance on Fly Balls
Year EV wOBA ISO Pull% HR/FB%
2015 93.0 0.491 0.584 21.5 13.6
2016 92.0 0.321 0.417 17.6 9.3
2017 93.3 0.478 0.674 22.2 14.1
2018 91.5 0.419 0.485 23.3 10.3
2019 91.7 0.362 0.435 25.9 8.8
2020 91.2 0.433 0.455 24.2 19.1
2021 95.0 0.725 0.978 33.3 26.9
Career Average 92.5 0.456 0.564 25.3 12.6

The spikes in wOBA and ISO are big improvements on their own, but when you notice how often he is pulling his fly balls, it becomes clear where his power breakout is coming from.

So how do you replace that? The Giants have a deep and talented lineup — the best in the National League — and have survived and thrived without key players all season, but losing Belt, who had a 207 wRC+ in September, feels like the toughest blow yet. This isn’t the first time this year they’ve had to go on without him, though, as a knee injury kept him out for six weeks earlier in the season, so we certainly have a better idea about how Gabe Kapler will approach the loss this time around.

The Giants went 20–14 without Belt earlier in the year, which somehow is one of their worst stretches of the year. The relatively pedestrian performance was not the fault of his replacements, though. LaMonte Wade Jr. and Darin Ruf both filled in at first base with resounding success — a 145 wRC+ for the former and an absurd 175 wRC+ for the latter. The problem right now is that Ruf is currently dealing with a minor oblique injury, though it seems likely he’ll be back before the postseason starts.

If you are a frequent reader of FanGraphs, you may already be familiar with these two players and the breakouts they have had this year. Just last week, Jay Jaffe wrote all about Wade and his success in high-leverage moments:

Wade’s splits, small sample though they may be, are just ridiculous, the stuff of cartoon superheroes. He’s hit .375/.413/.696 in 124 PA with men on base (but just .208/.307/.416 with the bases empty), .379/.408/.652 in 71 PA with runners in scoring position, .356/.442/.511 in 52 PA in close-and-late situations, .412/.426/.667 in 56 PA in high-leverage situations, and .423/.483/.923 in 29 PA with two outs and runners in scoring position.

As good as Wade has been, he’s largely only in the lineups against righties; he has 41 plate appearances and a 0 wRC+ against southpaws. This is where Ruf and his 164 wRC+ against lefties comes in. Earlier this month, Devan Fink wrote about his elite plate discipline, like his very low Swing%:

This tendency gets him into more favorable counts more often, with more than 31% of the pitches he’s seen this season coming while ahead in the count, a 91st percentile mark. That’s by far the highest rate of his career.

Ruf is more than just a lefty masher, though. He’s played a lot against righties this year (164 PA) and more than held his own (125 wRC+). That figure is good for sixth best on the team versus right-handers, more than enough to be earning starts against them in the postseason. As far as replacements go, you could do a lot worse than those two.

I have a feeling we may see both Wade and Ruf start against righties, with the former in a corner outfield spot, where he has more experience than Ruf, and the latter at first base. The right-handed hitting Wilmer Flores is another option at first, especially until Ruf returns; his 118 career wRC+ against lefties and a career-high walk rate have earned him plenty of playing time this season.

Regardless of whether he returns in October, Belt’s contract is up after this season, so he very well could have played his final game in a Giants uniform. His performance the last two years couldn’t have come at a better time; he’s more than earned himself a multi-year contract, even if he’s turning 34 next April. He’s been a huge part of why the Giants have baseball’s best record heading into the final week of the season, and his tenure and leadership role on this team will likely have both sides eager to work out a contract, even if he doesn’t take another at-bat this season.





Luke Hooper is a designer and writer at FanGraphs. He lives in Portland, Oregon, longing for a major league team to materialize.

28 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sphenreckson
2 years ago

There’s no way the Giants don’t re-sign him, is there?

shivaemember
2 years ago
Reply to  sphenreckson

There’s a possibility that they don’t find agreement if Belt prefers to play in a more hitter-friendly environment on a short-term deal, which the Giants will likely offer due to his injury history. Belt’s an outstanding hitter — and an AL team that can deploy him at DH might consider him more valuable than the Giants do, who prioritize positional flexibility in addition to selectivity at the plate. The Giants could choose to reroute those resources to bring in more compelling SPs or a player with more positional flexibility, like Corey Seager.

TKDCmember
2 years ago
Reply to  sphenreckson

I’d think they would QO him (I assume he hasn’t been QOed previously, but could be wrong) and honestly it might hamper his potential market enough that he would consider taking it. Would be very interesting to see the relative markets for him and Rizzo.

natedub
2 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

He’s never been a free agent, so there’s no chance he could have been QO’d previously. If the Giants want him back, they’ll absolutely QO him. For starters, Rizzo and Freeman will also be on the market. Rizzo doesn’t come with a QO, and Freeman is also Freddie Freeman. So Belt might be inclined to accept a 1-year deal to return.

sadtrombonemember
2 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

If they QO him I think there’s about a 99% Belt takes it. I’m not sure whether that means they should offer it to him or they shouldn’t, but I’m leaning towards “shouldn’t–they can probably get him at two years at a lower AAV.

TKDCmember
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Considering his age and injury history, I’d think that AAV would need to be significantly lower or I’d rather just have the one year commitment.

cartermember
2 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

He is much better than Rizzo tho. And I know he likely won’t have the biggest market, but he has been an elite hitter for a while now, and I think is a true talent 130+ guy at minimum, which is something you can say about only a handful of guys in the MLB.

TKDCmember
2 years ago
Reply to  carter

I’m not sure why you would think that Belt, at a minimum, is a true talent 130+ wRC player going into his age 34 season, with a career 126 wRC+. At a minimum? To me, the minimum is that he can’t replicate his success of 2020-21 (less than one full season of plate appearances), so he’s basically the 2017-19 version of Belt, but now older.

Even truly elite first baseman are a risky proposition when already solidly mid-thirties. Rizzo has had an extremely troubling 2020-21, but he’s younger and prior to 2020 had a much, much better career than Belt. It’s not hard to imagine some teams buying into a resurgence from the previously better and still younger player.

cartermember
2 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

You are right, at a minimum was wrong. I would take the over on his roster projection of 129 for next year, though. And I wouldn’t say Rizzo has had a much better career either. 26 war in 1200 games is about the same as 31 war in 1400 games (just looked so apx numbers on phone)and I would weigh what is done recently vs what has been done over course of career for future performance. To me if Belt had been healthy he’d have had every much as good of a career that Rizzo has had.

erodcalmember
2 years ago
Reply to  carter

I agree. Without injuries and park difference, Belt’s career numbers would be closer to Rizzo. They’re a bit different in that Rizzo doesn’t strike out as much, but for many years they had roughly the same xwOBA. Also while Rizzo shows up as 2 yrs. younger, he’s only 16 mos. younger I believe. Oh and even though Belt was down for 2017-2019, a lot of that was 2nd half of 2018 after a knee injury and bad luck in 2019 (so many doubles/deep outs at Oracle). I think Giants will give him the QO and then maybe do a 2 year deal similar to Crawford’s.

TKDCmember
2 years ago
Reply to  erodcal

Everyone is better when you make exceptions. You might’ve right, but you also might be wrong. It’ll be very interesting and we’ll likely know in a years time.

kick me in the GO NATSmember
2 years ago
Reply to  carter

probably a better career as injuries do sap your ability to hit over time.

Andrew Rhodes
2 years ago
Reply to  sphenreckson

The old giants might not have, wanting to use the 1B and DH spots to keep posey fresh. The new plan had been to rest posey entirely so those 1B and DH bats are fair game. You gotta think the GM wants to use those spots for scrap heap/ cheap reclamation projects. Or is that what belt is now?
I’d be surprised if he got an offer higher than the one from the giants though. (Obviously I’ve assumed the DH comes to NL next year. Please. )