Yankees Acquire Aaron Hicks, A Potential Bargain

While it’s not going down as any kind of blockbuster, the Twins and Yankees struck a deal today, with Minnesota sending outfielder Aaron Hicks to the Yankees for catcher JR Murphy.

Hicks, a former highly though of prospect, finally showed some signs of life in 2015, putting up +1.5 WAR in 97 games after getting called back up from Triple-A. The improvement primarily came from his ability to avoid strikeouts, which looks to be potentially caused by a new-found willingness to swing at pitches in the strike zone; his in-zone swing rate jumped to 66%, significantly higher than it had been in his first two runs through the big leagues. With enough power to not just be a slap hitter and a good enough eye to draw some walks, Hicks profiles as something like a league average hitter going forward; Steamer projects him for a 99 wRC+ in 2016.

With some baserunning value and decent enough defense in center field, that makes Hicks a potentially interesting piece. In fact, if you look at the Steamer600 projections, where playing time is equalized for all players, you’ll note that Hicks looks like the kind of outfielder the Yankees have shown affinity for.

The Yankees Have a Type
Name PA AVG OBP SLG OPS wOBA wRC+ BsR Fld Off Def WAR
Jacoby Ellsbury 600 0.264 0.323 0.396 0.719 0.313 96 2.9 -0.6 0.1 1.6 2.3
Aaron Hicks 600 0.256 0.331 0.395 0.726 0.318 99 0.7 4.7 0.3 -0.6 2.1
Brett Gardner 600 0.256 0.331 0.395 0.727 0.319 100 2.3 2.8 2.3 -2.8 2.0

The Yankees are rumored to be talking to teams about Brett Gardner, and they’d almost certainly move Jacoby Ellsbury if someone wanted to pick up a good chunk of the rest of his contract, so by acquiring Hicks, the team has basically set themselves up to have an internal replacement in case they move one of their veteran outfielders. And, of course, Hicks is significantly younger and cheaper, so the fact that they might not lose much in expected production from shipping out either Gardner or Ellsbury sets them up to come out well ahead of things if they can get a good return for the name-brand version of this player-type. Hicks isn’t likely to turn into a star, but he looks like he could be a solid average everyday player, and as a league minimum guy with five four years left of team control, this is a nice asset for the Yankees to pick up.

From the Twins perspective, they land a young catcher who also has shown signs of putting up decent offensive production at an up the middle position, but I’m a little more skeptical that he’ll retain his offensive value going forward. Murphy possesses less power than Hicks, but doesn’t offset that with better contact skills, nor has he shown the willingness to take pitches in order to draw walks to keep his on-base percentage up. His decent numbers in part-time play the last two years are BABIP-driven, and as a slow-footed catcher who doesn’t have a remarkable batted ball profile — his infield fly rate is actually higher than average — that shouldn’t be expected to last.

So Murphy’s probably more of a below average hitter, with Steamer projecting him as an 85 wRC+ guy in 2016, and not a lot of offensive potential beyond that unless he finds some power he hasn’t yet shown. That’s good enough offense to play in the big leagues — Wilson Ramos has an 85 wRC+ over the last three seasons, for instance — but to be a quality performer, he’d have to be a very good defensive catcher; there’s not a ton of evidence that’s the case, though. Statcorner graded him out as exactly average at pitch framing, and while he throws out a good enough number of baserunners, he doesn’t appear to be anything special at blocking pitches in the dirt.

Overall, Murphy looks like he likely fits best as a part-time catching option, a guy with enough skills to not be a black hole behind the plate, but probably not a guy deserving of a full-time job. The Twins needed help behind the plate, and this beats paying a lot of money to Matt Wieters or something, but I don’t know that Murphy is going to be more than a decent platoon guy in Minnesota.

For me, that makes this trade a pretty nice move for the Yankees. In Hicks, they’re getting a guy not too different from the middle-tier free agent center fielders, all of whom are in their 30s and expected to land 3-4 year deals for $10+ million per year. To get that kind of player for a decent backup catcher is a nice move by Brian Cashman, and sets them up to potentially swap Gardner or Ellsbury for something better than Murphy, and freeing up money to potentially make a run at another starting pitcher. Like last year’s Devon Travis/Anthony Gose swap, this isn’t going to be any kind of headline news, but might be the kind of early offseason small move that ends up paying dividends for the Yankees.

We hoped you liked reading Yankees Acquire Aaron Hicks, A Potential Bargain by Dave Cameron!

Please support FanGraphs by becoming a member. We publish thousands of articles a year, host multiple podcasts, and have an ever growing database of baseball stats.

FanGraphs does not have a paywall. With your membership, we can continue to offer the content you've come to rely on and add to our unique baseball coverage.

Support FanGraphs




Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

newest oldest most voted
Steve sankey
Guest
Steve sankey

If Hicks splits against right handers are helped at all by the short porch in YS3 this could be a very nice get for Cashman

danny
Guest
danny

curious to see hicks’ fly ball data as a LHH and how it could play out in yankee stadium. huge swing going from right field in minn vs ny. much like the ackley trade- he had a great hard hit % on fly balls pulled but was thwarted by safeco.

SgtSchmidt11
Member
SgtSchmidt11

Hicks is barely a switch hitter.

He was so awful at it, he gave it up for awhile…

Steve
Guest
Steve

But he went back to it this year and found some success by swinging at pitches in the strike zone.

Ted Nelson
Guest
Ted Nelson

If Hicks happens to have a spray chart that fits YS really well, you might have a point.

Otherwise, inflated stats from an offense-friendly park don’t actually make the hitter move valuable… because all batters hit better in that park.

drewcorb
Member
drewcorb

I think that’s exactly what Steve sankey is saying: if Hicks’ batted ball profile fits a specific style, then moving from Target Field to Yankee Stadium could make Hicks more valuable. If he has a propensity for poorly hit fly balls to right field, then playing half his games in a park that increases rather than decreases the value of those batted balls could work out well for him.

Ted Nelson
Guest
Ted Nelson

I don’t think that’s what Steve was saying: “If Hicks splits against right handers are helped at all by the short porch in YS3 this could be a very nice get for Cashman.” Helped at all? Yeah, just about any LHH is going to be helped by YS. That doesn’t mean his batted ball profile fits the stadium particularly well.

My point is that while it might boost Hicks’ stats, a player’s value is generally a park neutral thing. Stick just about any LH hitter with some power in YS, and he’s going to hit more HRs. That doesn’t mean that he’s suddenly a better hitter, though.

drewcorb
Member
drewcorb

I can’t actually speak for Steve so maybe I misinterpreted him. And I am not saying that Hicks moving parks and seeing his stats increase as a result means he has become a better hitter. I’m just saying that if his batted ball profile is a good fit for the Yankee Stadium, then this could be a good move for Hicks and the Yankees. So if Hicks does indeed hit fly balls to right field more often than others, a trait which is detrimental in most parks will return a greater value in Yankee Stadium. But I don’t actually know Hicks’ spray chart so this is still all hypothetical, for me at least.