Yasiel Puig’s Historic Start

Fun fact: over the last 365 days, the best hitter in baseball has been neither Miguel Cabrera nor Mike Trout. Instead, Yasiel Puig has ascended to the top of the charts, posting a 172 wRC+ that just edges past both superstars. Also fun fact: that 172 wRC+ is Puig’s career mark, because his entire Major League experience has been contained within the last calendar year. He’s a dozen games shy of one full Major league season, and he has a 172 wRC+.

Let’s try and put that start in some historical perspective. Tony already noted how good Puig’s rookie season was, relative to other 22-year-olds, but let’s see if we can go a little further, and isolate the best debut years in baseball history. This is actually a little difficult, because querying gamelog totals is not particularly easy, but we can hack together a list of comparisons using Baseball-Reference’s Play Index and our summable game logs here on FanGraphs.

To get a starting list, I used B-R’s Play Index to show me hitters with the best performances in their first two seasons, minimum 600 plate appearances, sorted by OPS+. This isn’t perfect — some players get a few quick stints in the Majors, so they’d fall through the cracks here — but for the purposes of what we’re looking for, most of the guys who come up and mash from day one should appear on this list, and by measuring across the firs two seasons, we should be able to capture guys who debut too late in one year to show up on qualifying rookie leaderboards. So here are the top 10 hitters in MLB history by OPS+, over their first two seasons, minimum 600 plate appearances.

Rk Player Age Year 1 Year 2 PA OPS+
1 Frank Thomas 22-23 1990 1991 941 179
2 Yasiel Puig 22-23 2013 2014 641 170
3 Johnny Mize 23-24 1936 1937 1090 169
4 Fred Lynn 22-23 1974 1975 656 167
5 Benny Kauff 22-24 1912 1914 683 164
6 Kal Daniels 22-23 1986 1987 637 162
7 Dick Allen 21-22 1963 1964 734 161
8 Ted Williams 20-21 1939 1940 1336 161
9 Mark McGwire 22-23 1986 1987 699 157
10 Mike Trout 19-20 2011 2012 774 154

Puig ranks behind only Frank Thomas, who was one of the greatest hitters of all-time, but there are a few problems here. Because we’re measuring two seasons, most of these guys were given extra time to regress to the mean, and I’d argue that Johnny Mize’s 169 OPS+ is more impressive than Puig’s 170, given the extra 450 plate appearances. By setting the bar towards Puig’s PA total, we’re skewing things in his favor, so we really just want to compare Puig’s performance to other players through the first 150 games of their career.

This can be done through the summation of game log data. On FanGraphs, we don’t have historical game log data for all of history, but we do have it for more recent players, such as Thomas, so we can actually compare his first 150 games directly to Puig’s. In Thomas’ case, he debuted on August 2nd, 1990, so his 150th game occurred on July 21st, 1991. For the players that we have game log data on — our game data goes back to 1974 — I’ve gone through and summed the data for their first 150 games.

Player PA H 2B 3B HR R RBI SB CS
Fred Lynn 621 185 46 9 23 103 110 10 4
Yasiel Puig 641 183 33 5 29 93 80 16 11
Frank Thomas 640 160 29 4 23 95 92 1 2
Kal Daniels 507 141 28 5 25 89 65 33 9
Mike Trout 644 178 28 6 30 127 90 46 4
Mark McGwire 617 148 24 4 46 96 114 1 2
—– —– —– —– —– —– —– —– —– —–
Player BB% K% ISO BABIP AVG OBP SLG wOBA wRC+
Fred Lynn 11% 14% 0.245 0.382 0.348 0.418 0.592 0.447 179
Yasiel Puig 10% 21% 0.233 0.389 0.327 0.407 0.560 0.416 172
Frank Thomas 19% 20% 0.208 0.376 0.314 0.447 0.522 0.428 171
Kal Daniels 13% 14% 0.258 0.340 0.322 0.411 0.580 0.422 160
Mike Trout 9% 21% 0.227 0.356 0.311 0.374 0.538 0.389 152
Mark McGwire 11% 21% 0.315 0.276 0.275 0.355 0.590 0.395 147

While Thomas came out on top in the “first two years” query, it’s Fred Lynn who stands the tallest through the first 150 games. Puig scratches ahead of Thomas, and then there’s a big gap down to Daniels, Trout, and McGwire.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Of course, the fact that Fred Lynn is the best hitter identified through this method — a better database query writer than I could do a more exhaustive search on the complete Retrosheet database, and may very well find someone better than Lynn — is a nice reminder that sometimes great hitters do peak very early on. Lynn had a nice career, but he only had one more season as good as his rookie year, and settled in as more of a good player than a great one. That Puig has destroyed Major League pitching for the first 150 games of his career does not automatically guarantee that he will sustain this level of dominance going forward.

But, it’s still pretty freaking impressive. We’re talking about a guy who, through this point in his career, has been a better hitter than almost all of the greatest hitters of all-time. And he seems to be getting better. The story of Puig’s rookie year focused heavily on the parts of his game that reminded everyone of Manny Ramirez. Perhaps we shouldn’t miss out on the fact that he’s hitting like an in-his-prime Manny Ramirez as well.





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

74 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Tim
12 years ago

Does OPS+ take into account the fact that he does not play the game the right way and does not respect the game?

Kris
12 years ago
Reply to  Tim

All that brooding and now Kemp is the one who is benched. Mattingly has resorted to just benching great OFs at his leisure

The FoilsMember since 2017
12 years ago
Reply to  Kris

what is this

hscer
12 years ago
Reply to  Tim

Yasiel Puig is a weed diminishing the beauty of baseball with his slow pace http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/mlb/news/20140527/pace-of-game/

Aaron
12 years ago
Reply to  Tim

Does not respect the game? Improving one’s skill, making progress in your understanding of the game, hustling harder defensively than anyone on your team, and putting up All-Star caliber numbers on offense is a disrespect to the game of baseball? Those are all things we might broadly classify as refining one’s craft. So stop all this non-sense already. Disrespecting the game is seen in laziness, cheating, incessant whining, only performing in contact years, signing huge contracts and then underperforming, etc. Baseball is a game about numbers so if you have any numbers to back up your cliche comments please post them, and we would all like to discuss those. You may not like his personality, the way he plays or the culture he is from but stop hiding those personal feelings and opinions behind meaningless and empty phrases like “he doesn’t play the game the right way.” The guy doesn’t disrespect the game. Welcome to the 21st century where sports can celebrate diversity in personality and culture.

KCDaveInLA
12 years ago
Reply to  Aaron

I think they were being sarcastic, Tim. #BrianMcCann (if hashtags meant something on Fangraphs)

Tim
12 years ago
Reply to  Aaron

Yeah, there was some pretty heavy sarcasm there. “Old School” baseball writers constantly talk about his disrespect.

RT
12 years ago
Reply to  Tim

It’s incredible the degree of ignorance that Puig brings out in people. Kid had ~250 professional PA’s before appearing in the big leagues at the age of 22, in a country drastically different than where he came from, on a team with one of the biggest markets in the bigs. Not everywhere in the country plays the same as we do here in North America, and to *expect* someone to come over from where he came from at that young of an age and play like Derek Jeter on day 1 is insane. Throw in the fact that he plays as hard as anyone on the field… quite frankly it’s embarrassing to read/hear things like this comment.

Not Sure
12 years ago
Reply to  RT

Hey I was just thinking the same thing, cuz of *whooooosh*

Tim
12 years ago
Reply to  RT

Sarcasm does not play well on Fangraphs apparently. Noted.

Billy
12 years ago
Reply to  Tim

Whine whine whine. Quit bitching.

Dauber
12 years ago
Reply to  Billy

The location of the emergency GPS beacon has led the determination that Sarcasm is lost somewhere on Billy. Stay tuned to our ongoing coverage of the search for Sarcasm. Repeat: recent evidence proves that Sarcasm is lost on Billy.

John
12 years ago
Reply to  Tim

Hey Tim I don’t think you know the right way to be a fan. Respect the game and give this guy his due. He’s amazing. May be just as good as Trout (or better) when all is said and done.

mch38
11 years ago
Reply to  John

Haha, what a joke

ALEastbound
12 years ago

While Puig was of course a top rated prospect coming thru the ranks I think a part of the allure is that it felt like he sort of came out of nowhere. He certainly didn’t have the hype of a Trout, Miggy or even a guy like George Springer prior to his arrival.

bdhudson
12 years ago
Reply to  ALEastbound

What ranks? He played 63 minor league games.

Ballfan
12 years ago
Reply to  ALEastbound

thank you for re-defining contradiction

Nick C
12 years ago

Just wondering how Pujols is not on this list. 159 wRC+ in 676 PA’s in 2001.

Nick C
12 years ago
Reply to  Nick C

157 OPS + too. Either he went off in the last 76 PA’s on that year to really change those measures or something…

What am I missing?

Nick C
12 years ago
Reply to  Nick C

So I cut out the last 74 of Pujols PA’s for 2001 to give him 602 and his seasonal line through that point is slightly higher than his overall line for the year.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/gl.cgi?id=pujolal01&t=b&year=2001&share=2.95#1-143-sum:batting_gamelogs

mgeoffriau
12 years ago
Reply to  Nick C

Cameron is looking at the first 2 seasons of a player’s career. When you use those endpoints, Pujols’ OPS+ is 154, presumably just a few decimal points below Mike Trout.

Nick C
12 years ago
Reply to  Nick C

But then he switches to a 150 game cutoff. At 150 games, Pujols is ahead of Trout and McGwire.

Nick C
12 years ago
Reply to  Nick C

Now I get it. He used first 2 season data to create the first group then culled that group down to 150 games. By doing that he missed that Pujols first 150 games all occurred in the same season and were better than the bottom 2 on the second list.

Nick C
12 years ago
Reply to  Nick C

One final thought…I think by using first 2 seasons data Cameron might have missed some rookie seasons where there was some regression in the 2nd season. Looking just at the first 150 games might change the list a bit.

Mark
12 years ago
Reply to  Nick C

Pujols would have had a 154 or so wRC+ after 2 years, so he could have appeared on the second table if Dave looked at him.

Nick C
12 years ago
Reply to  Nick C

Just picked Ted Williams as an example. In 149 games (all in his rookie season 1939), Ted had a 160 OPS+.

Nick C
12 years ago
Reply to  Nick C

So…none of this changes the premise of the post. Puig has been truly outstanding through his first 150 games. He is certainly in elite company.

Evan
12 years ago
Reply to  Nick C

Pujols had a 162 wRC+ for his first 150 games, so ahead of Daniels as well.

Fangraphs calculates this if you set the start and end dates for a game log search to the appropriate dates. In Pujols’ case 4/2/2001 and 9/24/2001.

Nick C
12 years ago
Reply to  Nick C

Also trying to figure out why Ted Williams is on the first list but not the second.

Evan
12 years ago
Reply to  Nick C

Second list is the players from the first list for which Fangraphs has game logs of their first 150 games (1974-present).

vivalajeter
12 years ago

Having just finished the article, it seems like a Kal Daniels article needs to be written. Granted, I was 7 years old when he debuted, but I watched baseball in the 80’s and don’t have any idea who he is. Looking at his numbers, they’re off the charts for a few years – and then he suddenly falls off a cliff and is out of baseball.

Nevermind, Carson was on the case a year and a half ago. For someone who put up a 1.000+ OPS in 1987, I’m surprised I don’t know who he is.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/daily-notes-ft-kal-daniels-alternate-career-path/

EDogg1438
12 years ago
Reply to  vivalajeter

Kal Daniels had absolutely awful knees. He was the only player I ever saw who literally walked to first on a walk.

Might have been able to extend his career if he had gone to the AL to DH, but perhaps his knees were too bad even for that. He could absolutely rake when healthy though. Very good eye and could hit .300 with 25 HR power as a young player. Maybe could have developed into one of the best hitters in the league if he had stayed healthy. His minor league numbers as a healthy youngster were off the charts too.

David
12 years ago
Reply to  vivalajeter

In all the discussions of changes in the game that have made it so much more offense-friendly, not nearly enough is discussed about the impact of the concrete spraypainted green that was the playing surface in the toilet boil stadiums like Riverfront, Three Rivers, The Vet, and Montreal. Guys like Daniels, Erik Davis, Andre Dawson, Dave Parker, Gary Matthews – even someone like Kevin Bass, all battered their knees on AstrTurf and lost thousands of at-bats because of it.

The peak of the PED era overlapping the time all those horrible old mausoleums were being replaced by actual ballparks makes it hard to distinguish, but I’d love to see someone smarter than me (which is to say, pretty much anyone in the FanGraphs community) try to pull out the effect of the return to grass fields on player longevity and production.

Jason B
12 years ago
Reply to  David

Eric Davis, Andre Dawson, even Kevin Bass…their knees shot, but still they live on in RBI Baseball. No DL trips there.

Mr Baseball
12 years ago

Every analyst pre-season was bearish on Puig. They just took his BAIP and K rate and screamed LUCK!!!

Still a long way to go in predicting what guys will improve and breakout. We are good at validating but terrible at predicting breakouts. We are about as good as predicting earthquakes. We know they are going to happen, but when and where, we don’t know.

The FoilsMember since 2017
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

Are you the guy that repeats this everywhere? If so, you are annoying.

First, Puig did not breakout, really. He just improved a little. Don’t misuse the word — he was incredible last year too.

Second, you’re reading bad analysts. Everyone should have been a little bearish on Puig, just like everyone should be a little bearish, always, on Trout. Incredible success is hard to sustain, even if it is your true talent. Too many ways for you to be worse, not enough for you to be better.

But stats can and do let us predict breakouts all the freaking time. Puig changed his behavior at points last season. That was clear, and analysts who paid attention wrote about it.

Now, you can’t use stats to predict a breakout that doesn’t involve stats. A guy who adds a new pitch in the offseason, carves dudes up in ST, and then bursts onto the scene. You’re not going to catch that — we lacked the data.

But with Puig? The stats were there to be interpreted and it’s no one’s fault but your own if you read bad analysts or failed to perform the analysis on your own.

BipMember since 2016
12 years ago
Reply to  The Foils

This.

Mr Baseball
12 years ago
Reply to  The Foils

You have very thin skin. Everyone is always making predictions around here, even though when asked directly, the data we use isn’t really great is predicting the future. It is very much worth reminding people this, since everyone is obsessed with predicting the future perormance of these players.

The data here is not sufficient to be very good at spotting breakouts or guys that “improve a little” as you say or as Dave and I say, top 5 improvers in the game. To get better at predicting which players end up on lists like this we need more data, not less data.

You can keep your less data, I’ll continue to seek out more data.

I did my own analysis and expected this exact jump in Puig that basically nobody else saw except the Dodgers. It was less than 1 year ago the industry was claiming Puig was overrated and due to fall since NOBODY say this coming and the DATA (less data) said so.

I’m only pointing out obvious to anyone with a brain facts, you can choose to argue with math if you’d like.

Steven
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

So you’re saying his .402 babip is not due for regression? I’ll take the under on that.

The FoilsMember since 2017
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

You don’t know this site very well.

As a Dodger homer, I spent hours staring at Puig’s spreadsheets last year, watching the changes and watching the improvement. It was all here, in the numbers contained in these storied Internet web pages.

Data is complicated, and if you haven’t figured out what else this site has besides BABIP, then I don’t know what to tell you.

And, last thing: You accuse us of having thin skin, which must mean you think I’m… what, offended? No, I think you are annoying, but I didn’t say how annoying so you can’t rightfully accuse me of caring too much.

Mostly I think you have bad opinions and are probably insufferable IRL because you believe you are special.

The FoilsMember since 2017
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

Steven, don’t hurt “our” side by being a BABIP-slave.

Of course his .400 BABIP will regress. The question is “to what.”

Trout is only now at the sample size where you can declare that regressing his BABIP to his career average (.363) is more predictive than regressing to league average.

So it will be a long time till Puig gets there. That said, when I’m regressing him, I’m regressing him down to Trout’s career BABIP. Because I have eyes, and I think about what they see.

BipMember since 2016
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

Whoa dude, you saw this coming despite his terrible plate discipline numbers last year? Care to share some of that data with us? If you really did find some better predictors, that I genuinely want to see it.

george
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

IIRC the bearishness came partly because of the BABIP and partly due to alleged attitude and partly because of the physical shape that he brought with him to spring training

The FoilsMember since 2017
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

@BIP

Oh, just splits. I think most people weren’t paying much attention when he started changing his approach midway through last season and laying off the outside pitch.

It was also right around the time he started getting jammed inside and would swing through fastballs for the first time, so it certainly could have gone either way.

But the fact that he started walking more coupled with being later on inside fastballs is a decent indicator that he was getting a little more serious about taking pitches. Just had to figure out which ones he wanted to take.

BipMember since 2016
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

@{The Foils} My question was directed at Mr Baseball, just FYI. I did see that his plate discipline had improved by September of last year, but his BABIP plummeted, which is what most people noticed. Usually, data from the last month of a season useful for little else than wishful thinking, but that didn’t stop me from taking some encouragement from it.

Somehow I don’t think Mr Baseball is talking about split season PitchFX plate discipline data, however, which is why I asked.

Jason B
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

“I did my own analysis and expected this exact jump in Puig that basically nobody else saw except the Dodgers.”

Please show your work.

BipMember since 2016
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

This doesn’t even make sense. 2013 was his breakout. By your reasoning, we should have been able to easily see he was legit after 2013. What we didn’t anticipate is that he would totally reverse the huge warning signs he had last year, mainly his propensity to whiff at pitches out of the zone.

The methodology was sound. Generally, plate discipline data is more stable than production data. Puig’s plate discipline data last year suggested there was a real chance he was going to whiff himself into oblivion. That Puig adjusted his approach and avoided that fate does not invalidate the prediction model.

I’ve noticed that you’ve basically made this exact comment on every single article about Puig to show up lately. What are you trying to prove?

Mr Baseball
12 years ago
Reply to  Bip

You keep making points defending the ability of the data we use here to be CONFIRMING. Nobody is arguing that this data is not good at confirming. What it is now however good at is predicing sudden change.

The analysts that scanned BAIP and K rate lazily screamed REGRESSION!! Never bothering to mention the factors that can lead to improvement, not regression. In fact all time caliber players often take big steps in year two and improve at every level of pro ball over the first 3-5 years.

The thin skin I’m witnessing is this group being uncomfortable with the fact the data here is quite limited. Why argue against me on this point? You are just digging a hole.

Emcee Peepants
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

Would you like a cookie for your efforts? Or should I say EFFORTS!

Also, I hear Mrs Baseball is a slut.

Steven
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

What on earth are you trying to say? That stats cannot 100% predict the future? My god, you may be on to something. Oh wait, you aren’t the first person to think of this. I have NEVER seen a Fangraphs article that claimed the metrics can 100% predict the future. You are using a straw man.

BipMember since 2016
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

The analysts that scanned BAIP and K rate lazily screamed REGRESSION!! Never bothering to mention the factors that can lead to improvement, not regression.

As multiple poster have pointed out to you – myself included, on another article – we have no interest in defending that kind of lazy analysis. I’m having a hard time figuring out who it is you are objecting to.

My post was pointing out that it’s not even clear what you’re saying. You say stats can’t predict breakouts; cool, Puig already had his breakout. We’re now talking about how likely he is to sustain it. Some numbers, not just BABIP and K%, suggested he may not. You’re creating an artificial distinction between predicting a breakout and projecting a player that has already had one.

In fact all time caliber players often take big steps in year two and improve at every level of pro ball over the first 3-5 years.

Except that whether Puig is an all-time-great caliber player is dependent on whether he improves over his early seasons, making this argument circular.

David
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

Regression can be improvement, methinks maybe you don’t understand regression?

Its possible you are trying to articulate that one of the things we are currently worst at predicting is changes in approach, whether it be swing profile or pitch selection. While this would be a correct assertion, I’m not sure it would be news to many people.

mch38
11 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

Hey look, you were wrong just as everyone predicted

Mr Baseball
12 years ago
Reply to  Bip

It’s funny you use the words “prediction model”. I’m not disputing that models ability to say Puig had a 5 or 10 or 20%, whatever chance to improve K rate dramatically….actually it probably predicted 5% or less.

I’m pointing out the facts of this model that it was unable to be very accurate. I’m pointing out that it doesn’t even try to be very accurate since it is unable to be precise it deals is huge ranges.

I’m merely saying I’m not impressed with the huge ranges your “prediction model” (LOL!) uses. My niece can now accurately scan the basic underlying data and see what the range will be. Hell a 50 year vet scout can do this. That’s probably why many stats guys have been getting fired so quickly.

I’m thristy for a more accurate prediction model. One that we can actually brag about and one that doesn’t deal is such massive ranges. Not tout accuracy when the dart board is as big as Texas.

Continue to be impressed with your “prediction model” which will tell me with 95% certainty the sun will rise tomorrow. I’ll seek and demand better data. Progress moves forward, go ahead and stick with your old school data. I’ll seek better data, higher quality data.

Steven
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

Obvious troll is obvious.

The FoilsMember since 2017
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

“I’ll seek and demand better data.”

Like what. Name anything.

BipMember since 2016
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

Continue to be impressed with your “prediction model” which will tell me with 95% certainty the sun will rise tomorrow. I’ll seek and demand better data. Progress moves forward, go ahead and stick with your old school data. I’ll seek better data, higher quality data.

This is getting plain weird.

This entire site is dedicated to finding better and better data. If someone were to come up with a new model that revolutionized how we build player projections, the group of people you’re so fervently arguing against are exactly the people that would be most interested. That’s why we’re here.

When someone on this site has a problem with a model, they calmly and rationally make their case and propose an alternative. Your manner is speaking to some kind of deeper emotional investment in something that is beyond me.

Johnston
12 years ago
Reply to  Mr Baseball

“I’ll seek better data, higher quality data.”

Good luck with that!

DNA+
12 years ago

I once bet my uncle $50 that Kal Daniels would never hit 50 homeruns. The reason it was even discussed is this baseball card where we thought his muscles were huge! http://www.comc.com/Cards/Baseball/1988/Score/86/Kal_Daniels/1929513

1) I still haven’t collected on that bet.
2) In retrospect “huge muscles” prior to the steroid era are not all that impressive.

DNA+
12 years ago
Reply to  DNA+

…meant this in reply to vivalajeter above.

Emcee Peepants
12 years ago

No matter how good he is, he has yet to improve the chances of my dad ever pronouncing his name correctly.

jrubyMember since 2026
12 years ago
Reply to  Emcee Peepants

Kids sitting behind me at the Dodgers-Phillies game (no, not the no-hitter, sigh) seemed to be calling him Yay-zill Poog.

Sorab Ghandhi
12 years ago
Reply to  jruby

And its only getting better with the call up of Erisbel Arruebarruena.

manbearpuig
12 years ago

Its kind of mind boggling that he’s more than a full year younger than Springer and many other top prospects.

Greg
12 years ago

For his career, Puig has a below average LD%, an above average GB%, a below average FB%… and the best career BABIP of all time by just over .10. How is he doing this?

Sorab Ghandhi
12 years ago
Reply to  Greg

He hits the ball really hard. Almost every game I’ve seen him in he has hit a ground ball that just screams past the fielders. The scary thing is that his below average fly ball rate is hurting his home run total. It will be exciting to see what happens.

Sorab Ghandhi
12 years ago
Reply to  Greg
obsessivegiantscompulsive
12 years ago

What I would like to see is where Puig would have been on the list of 5 month players before he started hitting like Babe Ruth in May.

ivdown
12 years ago

I would also like to see how his numbers look when you don’t use all of them? Can we see where he ranks all-time when you take out all of his home runs?

Phantom Stranger
12 years ago

Like I said when he first hit the major leagues, Puig is the type of athlete baseball doesn’t get anymore. If he had born in the States he’d be an NFL running back today.

Anon
12 years ago

And that American-born Puig would have 4 good years in the NFL (if he’s lucky) only to have injuries force him into early retirement and a life of health problems. Couple that with the way compensation is structured in both sports (MLB contracts are guaranteed while NFL contracts are not) and it really makes you wonder why any freak athlete would choose football.

Johnston
12 years ago
Reply to  Anon

I went to college with one of them. His answer? “I want to be a star.”

And, predictably, he got injured. Today he has trouble just walking.

Baseball is a much, much wiser choice for someone with that level of talent.

Swfcdan
12 years ago

Ridinkulous. Though his sky-high .389 BABIP does explain some of it. No way thats sustainable going forward.

WormFace
12 years ago

Tulo or Puig in 2014?