Yesterday’s Dancing Knuckleball

Yesterday, knuckleballer Charlie Haeger had a pretty amazing game. He struck out 12 batters while walking four in six innings. He also threw three wild pitches, two of which were on third strikes and got far enough from A.J. Ellis for the batter to reach.

Obviously, based on the 12 strikeouts, Ellis wasn’t the only one having a tough time with Haeger’s knuckler. By my count he threw 94 knuckleballs (along with 22 fastballs) with 43 swings and 13 whiffs. That works out to a 70% contact rate and a 13.8% swinging strike percentage. Both those rates are very good. That contact rate was about where Huston Street and Andrew Bailey were all of last year (not to say that Haeger will maintain such a rate, but just to put it in context). Haeger’s knuckleball was dancing like crazy.

I have talked about the knuckleball before, but here’s a quick refresher. While all other pitch types have consistent movement — fastballs rise and move towards the glove-side, curves drop and move away from the glove-side — and cluster out cleanly in horizontal movement versus vertical movement space, the knuckleball has no clear movement and instead forms a diffuse cloud when plotted in horizontal movement versus vertical movement space. Some move up-and-in, others up-and-away, others down-and-in, and others don’t move much at all. Not surprisingly, the success of a knuckleball is directly tied to this amount of movement. Those which move little are rarely whiffed and hit hard. Those that move far result in whiffs and weak contact. Tim Wakefield is successful because his knuckles have a large spread in movement.

With that in mind I wanted to see whether Haeger’s knuckleballs yesterday had more movement than they did in his previous appearances. Here are the fraction of Haeger’s knuckleballs whose movement fell in one of three categories (movement measured as the square root of the sum of the square horizontal movement and square of vertical movement). I included the value from yesterday, his career and the value for Wakefield’s knuckleballs.

                   Haeger          Wakefield
               Career  Yesterday    Career
0-5  inches      0.35      0.32      0.32   
5-10 inches      0.53      0.50      0.48
10+  inches      0.12      0.18      0.20

Haeger’s knuckleball was moving a lot more than previously in his career, though still not as much as Wakefield has averaged through his career. Obviously this one value does not tell you everything, but I think it is a nice metric to show us that his knuckleballs were really moving yesterday — that is if the 12 strikeouts wasn’t enough.





Dave Allen's other baseball work can be found at Baseball Analysts.

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Matt
14 years ago

Does wind current play a role, I wonder? From what I remember, knuckleball pitchers prefer to have a breeze blowing directly at them to help them generate movement on the pitch.

Travis Lmember
14 years ago
Reply to  Matt

I believe wind is a major factor with the knuckleball, and not just in how you described it. With a headwind, there is more air rushing at the ball, which will magnify the Bernoulli effect (the physics equations that describe the uneven pressure on the ball created by rotation. That pressure causes the movement). This effect is probably similar for each different kind of pitch, creating more movement on breaking balls, etc., as well as the knuckler.

As Charlie Hough once explained to me, the knuckleball actually benefits as well from seemingly still days. Air currents are not continuous, you see, so the “jumping” motion of the knuckler is actually caused by the asymmetries of the wind force on the travel to the plate. These mini air-eddies cause that sharp and unpredictable movement, which is more beneficial to the knuckleball cmp to other pitches (a rotating ball, e.g. any other pitch, has greater angular momentum and is thus less affected by these micro-eddies).

So yes, wind current does matter, but not just macro-conditions. The micro conditions are just as important. However, it’s nearly impossible to measure those. I also expect diminishing returns on the headwind, as I suspect a faster headwind will make the microeddies move in a more consistent general vector; that will increase the movement of the knuckleball, but it will also make the movement less random (no darting in different directions like the true knuckleball; instead, it may resemble more of a knuckle curve).

Steve C
14 years ago
Reply to  Matt

If my memory and a quick Google serve me properly, most knucklers prefer to pitch indoors as there is no air flow to speak of allowing the pitch to move on its own and in a more consistent fashion.

Without looking things up (mostly because I don’t know how); Wakefield has typically performed above his own average at Tropicana field and the Blue Jays have specifically opened their dome when Wakefield is scheduled to pitch and the weather permits. Both anecdotal, but I am sure someone smarter than I could put some numbers behind his performance at Tropicana compared to his norms.

Steve C
14 years ago
Reply to  Steve C

Maybe I am not as inept as it seems.

All stats are for Wakefield

At the Trop
505 PA / .651 OPS Against / .240 BABIP
At the Metrodome (RIP)
310 PA / .683 OPS Against / .258 BABIP
Against the Rays (home and away)
900 PA / .667 OPS / .251 BABIP
Against the Twins (home and away)
629 PA / .706 OPS / .280 BABIP
At Home (entire career)
6469 PA / .741 OPS / .278 BABIP
On the road (entire career)
6208 PA / .743 OPS / .271 BABIP

I’d say he does pitch better in doors.

For reference, Wakefield averages over 700 PA / season.