2013 ZiPS Projections – Tampa Bay Rays

Dan Szymborski’s ZiPS projections, which have typically appeared in the pages of Baseball Think Factory, are being released at FanGraphs this year. Below are the projections for the Tampa Bay Rays. Szymborski can be found on Twitter at @DSzymborski.

Other 2013 Projections: Angels / Astros / Athletics / Blue Jays / Brewers / Cardinals / Cubs / Diamondbacks / Giants / Mets / Nationals / Phillies / Pirates / Rangers / Reds / Rockies / Royals / Tigers / White Sox.

Batters
In a study from February of 2012, Matt Swartz found that designated hitters, left fielders, and first basemen — in that order — were, on average, (over)paid the most dollars per win on the open market. It’s fitting, perhaps, in light of these findings, that the Tampa Bay — an organization that has distinguished itself for its efficient spending — would be weakest at these positions. The players mostly likely to fill those roles for Tampa Bay are Luke Scott, Sam Fuld, Shelley Duncan, and James Loney. Combined, they’re unlikely to make much more than $5 million this season, depending on the precise terms of Scott’s recent deal.

Regardless of the degree to which it informs our understanding of Evan Longoria’s actual future, his top comparable, Jim Ray Hart, is of some interest — if for no other reason than the reader has likely (and the author has definitely) never heard of him. Hart, however, was among the league’s best players for a four-year stretch in the 1960s, as this totally embiggenable WAR grid reveals:

Lest the reader find himself concerned about Hart’s whereabouts today, rest easy: per Wikipedia, he “retired in 2006 to a life of leisure and good health.”

Pitchers
The Rays finished second in the majors last season in what we’ve taken to calling Ball-in-Play Wins (BIP-Wins) — which is to say, wins gained by the suppression of park-adjusted opponent BABIP. So, while the pitching staff posted a 23.2 WAR collectively, they actually produced something closer to 30 wins based on runs allowed (i.e. RA9-Wins, a figure that also consider runs/wins from stranded runners).

Ought one attribute the runs/wins saved to the pitchers themselves — like Jeremy Hellickson, for example, who posted a 1.0 WAR but 4.2 RA9-Wins in 2012 — or to the skills of the individual defenders or to the frequent shifts employed by the Tampa Bay defense as a whole? Whatever the answer to the question, it calls attention to the impediment that remain to our understanding of run prevention and who, precisely, is responsible for it.

Bench/Prospects
ZiPS, which is generally conservative, nevertheless appears optimistic about recent acquisition Wil Myers‘ power. The former Royals prospect, who hit 37 home runs in 2012 between Double- and Triple-A, is projected to hit more homers than any other Ray in 2013 (albeit at a lower rate than Longoria). Shortstop prospect Hak-Ju Lee, meanwhile, is regarded by ZiPS as something close to an average major-league player.

Depth Chart
Here’s a rough depth chart for the Rays, with rounded projected WAR totals for each player (click to embiggen):

Ballpark graphic courtesy Eephus League. Credit to MLB Depth Charts for roster information.

Batters, Counting Stats

***

Batters, Rates and Averages

***

Batters, Assorted Other

***

Pitchers, Counting Stats

***

Pitchers, Rates and Averages

***

Pitchers, Assorted Other

***

Disclaimer: ZiPS projections are computer-based projections of performance. Performances have not been allocated to predicted playing time in the majors — many of the players listed above are unlikely to play in the majors at all in 2012. ZiPS is projecting equivalent production — a .240 ZiPS projection may end up being .280 in AAA or .300 in AA, for example. Whether or not a player will play is one of many non-statistical factors one has to take into account when predicting the future.

Players are listed with their most recent teams unless Dan has made a mistake. This is very possible as a lot of minor-league signings are generally unreported in the offseason.

ZiPS is projecting based on the AL having a 4.09 ERA and the NL having a 3.92 ERA.

Players that are expected to be out due to injury are still projected. More information is always better than less information and a computer isn’t what should be projecting the injury status of, for example, a pitcher with Tommy John surgery.

Regarding ERA+ vs. ERA- (and FIP+ vs. FIP-) and the differences therein: as Patriot notes here, they are not simply mirror images of each other. Writes Patriot: “ERA+ does not tell you that a pitcher’s ERA was X% less or more than the league’s ERA. It tells you that the league’s ERA was X% less or more than the pitcher’s ERA.”

Both hitters and pitchers are ranked by projected WAR.