2014 Positional Power Rankings: Left Field
What do we have here? For an explanation of this series, please read this introductory post. As noted in that introduction, the data is a hybrid projection of the ZIPS and Steamer systems with playing time determined through depth charts created by our team of authors. The rankings are based on aggregate projected WAR for each team at a given position. The author writing this post did not move your team down ten spots in order to make you angry. We don’t hate your team. I promise.
Also, keep in mind that these lists are based on rosters as of last week, so weekend transactions are not reflected in the rosters below. In some cases, teams have allocated playing time to different reserves than these depth charts show, but because they’re almost always choosing between near-replacement level players, the differences won’t move the needle much if at all.
This time last year, the Milwaukee Brewers and Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim were first and second on this list, respectively. This, of course, had mostly to due with the presence of Ryan Braun and Mike Trout. This year, Braun will be in right and Trout is expected to patrol center. This, along with the expected progression/regression of certain players has mixed up the top tier of the left field positional power rankings.
The departure of Braun and Trout from this list also flattens the peak a bit — whereas the Brewers and Angels were projected to receive more than five wins from their left field, the highest-projected left field in 2014 comes in at a shade above four wins. So, who grabbed the top spot?
#1 Nationals
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryce Harper | 518 | .277 | .361 | .504 | .374 | 23.1 | 0.2 | 4.2 | 4.0 |
| Nate McLouth | 133 | .247 | .319 | .383 | .311 | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Scott Hairston | 21 | .246 | .292 | .449 | .320 | 0.1 | 0.0 | -0.2 | 0.0 |
| Tyler Moore | 14 | .242 | .292 | .433 | .315 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Eury Perez | 14 | .278 | .305 | .355 | .292 | -0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .270 | .349 | .474 | .358 | 22.2 | 0.8 | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Much has been made of Mike Trout’s rise to prominence at such a young age, and rightfully so. However, Bryce Harper has been making quite a name for himself on the senior circuit. Since the beginning of the 20th century, only three players have been worth more wins through their age-20 season than Harper — Mel Ott, Ty Cobb, and Al Kaline. This is not bad company, at least if you are specifically looking at the company of baseball players. Though Harper was limited last season by injuries, his walk rate improved, his strikeout rate decreased, and he saw an uptick in power. When Harper needs to be spelled, Washington has the option of Nate McLouth, who should fill in in an admirable way. If the Nationals are going to compete at a level that many are expecting in 2014, Harper will/should have a big part to play. This is assuming that his sometimes, how would you say, hyper-aggressive style of play doesn’t lead to an extended DL stint.
#2 Cardinals
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Holliday | 595 | .282 | .366 | .473 | .366 | 24.5 | -0.3 | -3.9 | 3.4 |
| Allen Craig | 35 | .288 | .343 | .460 | .350 | 1.0 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 0.2 |
| Shane Robinson | 35 | .253 | .321 | .357 | .302 | -0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Matt Carpenter | 35 | .278 | .358 | .418 | .342 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Total | 700 | .280 | .362 | .463 | .360 | 26.0 | -0.3 | -3.9 | 3.8 |
Matt Holliday seems to be creating his own aging curve. While he has been declining, he hasn’t been declining in a way we may be used to seeing from such a productive player. Holiday is entering his age-34 season, and hasn’t been worth less than 4.5 WAR since 2006. The projections see him dipping below 4 WAR this season. His plate discipline has been pretty dang consistent over the past four seasons, but his power and defense are starting to decline with age. Still, three and a half wins is nothing to sneeze at (it would also be hard to actually sneeze at a win), and when you add some help from Allen Craig, left field should not be a big concern for a Cardinals team that is poised to make yet another deep postseason run.
#3 Royals
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Gordon | 588 | .271 | .343 | .435 | .340 | 8.6 | 0.9 | 8.2 | 3.3 |
| Justin Maxwell | 84 | .227 | .303 | .398 | .309 | -0.8 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
| Jarrod Dyson | 28 | .247 | .308 | .327 | .284 | -0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .264 | .337 | .426 | .334 | 7.0 | 1.3 | 9.0 | 3.6 |
Timing is everything when trying to build a competitive team from the ground up, and the Royals were hoping that the stars would align when Eric Hosmer and Mike Moustakas were brought on to compliment Alex Gordon in the hopes of building a big power threat in the middle of the lineup. Hosmer and Moustakas have shown flashes, but they still haven’t perhaps lived up to the hype quite yet. Meanwhile, Alex Gordon continues to decline. Gordon will still be good, just not as good as his 2011 or 2012 seasons. He hasn’t had many problems staying in the lineup, which should bode well for the Royals, as an intriguing but still-unproven Justin Maxwell looks to be Kansas City’s fourth outfielder. A small bounceback in BABIP should help Gordon, who still provides runs on defense and on the basepaths, but he came close to sniffing league-average offensively in 2013.
#4 Rockies
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Gonzalez | 560 | .289 | .356 | .530 | .379 | 17.8 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 3.4 |
| Corey Dickerson | 35 | .272 | .319 | .470 | .341 | 0.1 | -0.1 | -0.2 | 0.1 |
| Charlie Blackmon | 35 | .268 | .318 | .408 | .318 | -0.5 | 0.1 | -0.2 | 0.0 |
| Brandon Barnes | 35 | .253 | .301 | .394 | .306 | -0.9 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Drew Stubbs | 35 | .254 | .324 | .397 | .319 | -0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .283 | .348 | .507 | .367 | 15.9 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 3.5 |
When a player can produce nearly five wins in 436 plate appearances, he is doing something right. Based off wRC+, CarGo had his best season at the plate in 2013, hitting 49% better than league average. He also did well on the base paths and had previously-unseen value in the field. These were all good things, but are prime for regression, as the projections show. Gonzalez had a large spike in strikeout rate in 2013, though his walk rate and on-base percentage was fairly consistent. With Gonzalez, it all comes down to power and defense, something that saw large upticks last season. If he can repeat in those areas, he should be able to outplay his projections. If he regresses there, then he becomes simply a very-good outfielder. His health, like always, remains a question as well, and any missed time will lead to some mix of Corey Dickerson, Charlie Blackmon, or Brandon Barnes seeing more playing time.
#5 Rangers
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shin-Soo Choo | 616 | .272 | .388 | .438 | .366 | 18.7 | -0.2 | -2.4 | 3.2 |
| Engel Beltre | 35 | .250 | .290 | .350 | .282 | -1.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Michael Choice | 28 | .268 | .334 | .412 | .329 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.1 |
| Jim Adduci | 21 | .250 | .310 | .354 | .295 | -0.5 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .270 | .379 | .430 | .358 | 17.0 | -0.3 | -2.4 | 3.2 |
With the departures of Nelson Cruz and Craig Gentry, and the addition of Shin-Soo Choo, the Rangers outfield has seen a bit of a mixup in 2014. Last season, the Rangers outfield combined for a 99 wRC+, just a hair better than the 97 wRC+ the entire squad achieved. It was clear that the Rangers front office was interested in improving their hitting, as they brought on both Prince Fielder and Shin-Soo Choo. Choo signed for big money, as a player who hit 51% better than the league in his walk year would be expected to do. Choo’s baserunning and defense can be described as poor. Technically, they can be described as outstanding, but that wouldn’t really be accurate. Choo’s value comes from his bat and his ability to get on base. The former will probably regress faster than the latter, but Choo should still provide some good value for Texas in the next few seasons. The projections see some regression, which is to be expected for a player who posted career highs in nearly every category last season. Given Choo’s skillset, he will probably age a little better than your regular left fielder, but will always kind of hang around that 3-4 win area. That is not a bad thing, certainly, and Choo’s presence should help bolster a Rangers lineup that was right around league-average last year.
#6 Pirates
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starling Marte | 455 | .271 | .321 | .430 | .328 | 5.1 | 0.9 | 9.1 | 2.6 |
| Jose Tabata | 140 | .269 | .334 | .386 | .319 | 0.6 | -0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Travis Snider | 70 | .246 | .307 | .392 | .306 | -0.4 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 0.1 |
| Andrew Lambo | 21 | .231 | .288 | .404 | .302 | -0.2 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| Jaff Decker | 14 | .224 | .313 | .363 | .301 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .266 | .321 | .415 | .323 | 5.0 | 0.8 | 9.2 | 3.0 |
Projecting a player like Starling Marte isn’t easy. Well, it’s easy for a computer, probably. But it’s hard for us, due to the fact that we really only have one season to go off of. The projections expect Marte’s BABIP to regress a fair bit, as his 2013 mark of .363 looks unsustainable. And while that mark was quite high — good enough for 8th best among qualified hitters — we can’t say for sure it’s totally unsustainable, because we just don’t know. We do know that speed can help with BABIP, and that Marte does have some speed. The rest is fuzzy, and we’ll need more time to make proper hypotheses.
Garrett Jones’ departure should open up some playing time for Jose Tabata as well. He’s still young and showed some promise last season, at least from the plate. He’ll get most of his playing time in right field, most likely, but a combo of him, Marte, and the very muscular Travis Snider should produce well for a Pirates team looking to stay in playoff contention again this season.
#7 Athletics
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoenis Cespedes | 490 | .261 | .320 | .456 | .337 | 8.3 | -0.1 | 1.3 | 2.2 |
| Craig Gentry |
70 | .253 | .328 | .341 | .300 | -0.8 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 0.3 |
| Michael Taylor | 70 | .241 | .313 | .377 | .306 | -0.5 | 0.0 | -0.2 | 0.1 |
| Brandon Moss | 35 | .240 | .316 | .456 | .335 | 0.6 | -0.1 | -0.2 | 0.1 |
| Sam Fuld | 35 | .232 | .303 | .329 | .284 | -0.8 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .256 | .319 | .431 | .327 | 6.8 | 0.3 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
Yoenis Cespedes saw a fairly drastic drop in production between 2012 and 2013. His OBP, SLG, BB%, and K% all moved in the wrong direction, and 2013 as seen as a subpar year, at least compared to his rookie season. He did have some nagging injuries, which could certainly have played a part. It could also be that teams have learned how to pitch to him more effectively. Nevertheless, it’s unlikely that he will produce the paltry .318 wOBA of last season, and the projections see a bit of a bounceback for him as well.
Craig Gentry will most likely get time in every outfield position, barring injury of a starter. He’ll provide enough defensive value as a fill-in, but won’t and shouldn’t be counted on as a bench bat or long-term replacement in Oakland.
#8 Yankees
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brett Gardner | 595 | .258 | .338 | .380 | .320 | -1.4 | 3.2 | 8.7 | 2.6 |
| Ichiro Suzuki | 70 | .278 | .308 | .373 | .297 | -1.4 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
| Zoilo Almonte | 35 | .248 | .298 | .396 | .305 | -0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .260 | .333 | .380 | .317 | -3.3 | 3.3 | 9.2 | 2.7 |
Now that Jacoby Ellsbury is a Yankee (pause for Boston fans to dry heave), Gardner will see the majority of his time in left field. He was a valuable center fielder last season, and valuable left fielder before that, so he should be able to still save some runs in left for 2014. He will have to in order to have value for the Yankees, as the projections see him floating down to a league-average or worse hitter this season. He should still be a good base runner, but his lack of power and just-OK OBP will have to be made up for in other areas.
#9 Braves
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Upton | 490 | .265 | .354 | .456 | .353 | 14.4 | 1.2 | -0.8 | 2.6 |
| Ryan Doumit |
98 | .251 | .311 | .402 | .312 | -0.3 | -0.2 | -0.5 | 0.1 |
| Jordan Schafer | 42 | .218 | .292 | .309 | .270 | -1.5 | 0.1 | -0.1 | -0.1 |
| Evan Gattis |
21 | .252 | .302 | .464 | .330 | 0.2 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.1 |
| Jose Constanza | 21 | .259 | .305 | .312 | .275 | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Joey Terdoslavich | 14 | .248 | .298 | .401 | .305 | -0.1 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| Todd Cunningham | 14 | .251 | .305 | .331 | .285 | -0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .259 | .339 | .432 | .337 | 11.7 | 1.0 | -1.7 | 2.6 |
If Justin Upton’s 2013 season were an Oreo cookie, those two sweet chocolate wafers would have encased a filling that tasted like hot garbage. Despite an easily rememberable cold streak, he still finished the season as a three-win player, but those days might be over. His big spike in strikeout rate was offset some by a rise in power numbers, but those power numbers could be a result of a heightened HR/FB rate. He’s a streaky player to be sure, and still young enough, but it seems as if Justin Upton’s best days may be behind him.
#10 Dodgers
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carl Crawford |
525 | .271 | .315 | .413 | .317 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 4.2 | 2.0 |
| Andre Ethier | 154 | .266 | .344 | .417 | .332 | 2.5 | -0.2 | -1.2 | 0.4 |
| Scott Van Slyke | 14 | .245 | .325 | .411 | .324 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Mike Baxter | 7 | .241 | .321 | .370 | .307 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .269 | .322 | .413 | .321 | 5.1 | 1.6 | 3.0 | 2.5 |
Los Angeles was thought to try and trade one of their outfielders in the offseason, as Yasiel Puig’s rise to prominence created a bit of a logjam. The Dodgers apparently saw that as a good problem to have, and considering the general health track record of the outfield, that might not be a bad idea. Crawford is now four seasons removed from his last truly productive season, and projects to be a two-win player. This isn’t bad in a vacuum, but it is bad when you consider Crawford’s contract. A combination of age and a proclivity for injury have brought Crawford’s value down considerably, and he’s no longer considered a power/speed threat.
Ethier will see time in both corners, and perhaps even a little center. He’s a streaky player, which could be detrimental depending on which version of Andre Ethier shows up when it’s his turn in the outfield rotation. His hitting should even out to be above-average overall, but his usage might look like a head-scratcher to fans at times if the bad Either rears his head.
#11 Padres
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Quentin | 490 | .252 | .341 | .454 | .349 | 14.6 | -0.9 | -7.5 | 1.7 |
| Chris Denorfia |
105 | .264 | .321 | .384 | .311 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
| Seth Smith |
70 | .246 | .322 | .406 | .318 | 0.4 | 0.0 | -0.4 | 0.2 |
| Kyle Blanks | 35 | .233 | .301 | .394 | .306 | -0.1 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .252 | .334 | .435 | .338 | 15.0 | -0.8 | -7.4 | 2.2 |
If science were ever to find a way to keep Carlos Quentin healthy, he’d be a force to be reckoned with. His on-base/power combo is buried by his inability to stay on the field with any consistency — he appeared in less than 120 games in six of his last eight seasons. The Padres, of course, are aware of this, and have prepared for it by loading up on other outfielders to fill in for when Quentin eventually gets hurt. Seth Smith and Kyle Blanks could form a decent platoon, but Blanks hasn’t been a bastion of health himself. It’ll be a game of musical outfielders, and when the music stops, San Diego will hope to have enough bodies left to patrol the outfield.
#12 Angels
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Hamilton | 490 | .257 | .318 | .447 | .329 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| J.B. Shuck | 105 | .263 | .319 | .328 | .290 | -1.9 | -0.1 | -0.3 | 0.0 |
| Collin Cowgill | 70 | .239 | .294 | .356 | .288 | -1.4 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| Raul Ibanez | 35 | .236 | .296 | .424 | .313 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .255 | .315 | .419 | .318 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 2.1 |
With Mark Trumbo gone, and with the Angels finally realizing that Mike Trout should be manning center, Josh Hamilton has been moved to left. To call Hamilton’s 2013 a disappointment would be a bit of an understatement. His power numbers took a dive, and a move from Arlington can’t be all to blame. A career-low in ISO (and a .110 drop from 2012) is indicative of something else affecting his usual power stroke ways. He really struggled against lefties last year, to the tune of a 61 wRC+. J.B. Shuck had more success against lefties than righties, despite hitting from the left side, so he may see more time in a platoon if Hamilton’s struggles continue. Hamilton is now just a good player, not a great player. He should bounce back from a disastrous 2013 season, though he won’t be the superstar of old.
Colin Cowgill hasn’t shown much promise to this point, and if he continues to struggle, he may find himself being optioned sooner than later. If that’s the case, and J.B. Shuck needs to fill in elsewhere, we may see some LF appearances by (gulp) Raul Ibanez.
#13 Phillies
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domonic Brown | 560 | .269 | .331 | .477 | .349 | 13.3 | -0.4 | -5.0 | 2.0 |
| Darin Ruf |
35 | .244 | .317 | .410 | .320 | 0.0 | -0.1 | -0.2 | 0.0 |
| John Mayberry | 42 | .240 | .297 | .402 | .306 | -0.4 | 0.0 | -0.2 | 0.0 |
| Steve Susdorf | 35 | .262 | .318 | .360 | .301 | -0.5 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| Freddy Galvis |
28 | .243 | .280 | .362 | .281 | -0.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .265 | .326 | .459 | .340 | 11.6 | -0.5 | -5.5 | 2.0 |
With Domonic Brown being permanently installed in the Philadelphia outfield, Phillies fans were finally given a chance to see what he could do when given a chance. Brown posted a low BABIP in 2013, but it was actually fairly consistent with his major-league track record. The projections see Brown repeating his 2013 season, more or less, which is not a bad thing at all. Brown was pretty much league-average against lefties last season, so he shouldn’t be a candidate for a platoon.
Mayberry will see the majority of his playing time in center, most likely, and Ruf will probably be used to spell Ryan Howard at first more than anything, so left field is Brown’s job for 2014. And if 2014 Domonic Brown is a decent copy of 2013 Domonic Brown, the Phillies left field situation should be OK. The rest of that team, however …
#14 Diamondbacks
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Trumbo | 490 | .261 | .315 | .497 | .349 | 9.6 | -0.3 | -5.0 | 1.5 |
| Gerardo Parra | 105 | .272 | .331 | .406 | .321 | -0.3 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 0.4 |
| Cody Ross |
70 | .261 | .323 | .429 | .328 | 0.2 | -0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Alfredo Marte | 21 | .244 | .291 | .375 | .293 | -0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Matt Tuiasosopo | 14 | .221 | .305 | .355 | .296 | -0.3 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .262 | .317 | .470 | .340 | 8.8 | -0.4 | -3.2 | 2.0 |
Mark Trumbo is now in Arizona where, if history is to be believed, he will continue to strike out and hit home runs. Both his strikeout rate and home run rate were at career highs in 2013, and Trumbo has pretty much nailed down his profile. He is who we thought he was, to borrow a phrase. The projections actually see an uptick in offense for Trumbo this season, but an overall downturn in WAR due to a decrease in playing time. He won’t need to play so much first base as he did in L.A., can’t DH obviously, and it’s likely that he’ll get spelled by Gerardo Parra a fair deal.
Parra provides a tremendous upgrade over Trumbo in defense, and Parra does handle right-handed pitching better as well. In truth, Trumbo and Parra would make for a good platoon pair, but Arizona did not trade away Tyler Skaggs and Adam Eaton for a platoon bat. Parra will also see action at every outfield position as well, so his time in left will have to be limited. The amount of time Cody Ross sees will have to do with how well and how quickly he recovers from hip surgery. He only saw one plate appearance in Spring Training, and isn’t expected back from the DL until mid-April. Depending on his recovery, he may also spell Trumbo at times, though he wouldn’t be a platoon candidate.
#15 Indians
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Brantley | 525 | .275 | .331 | .388 | .316 | 0.9 | 0.7 | -0.3 | 1.4 |
| Ryan Raburn |
175 | .237 | .300 | .413 | .312 | -0.2 | -0.1 | -0.8 | 0.3 |
| Total | 700 | .265 | .324 | .394 | .315 | 0.7 | 0.6 | -1.1 | 1.7 |
Michael Brantley is fine. He’s fine. That’s the best way I can put it. He’s an OK hitter with no power who can steal some bases. He’s a lefty that can hit righties.
Ryan Raburn is also fine. He’s a little-better-than-OK hitter with some power who can’t steal bases. He’s a righty that can hit lefties.
Brantley and Raburn make for good platoon partners, but Raburn will have to fill in in right and perhaps DH as well. Both players are serviceable, and, if used in conjunction, could be better than the sum of their parts. The Indians are looking at a (you guessed it) league-average left field. There are worse things to have.
#16 Marlins
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Yelich | 490 | .259 | .329 | .404 | .323 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 1.5 |
| Brian Bogusevic | 105 | .240 | .316 | .364 | .303 | -1.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| Kyle Jensen | 35 | .218 | .287 | .379 | .294 | -0.7 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| Garrett Jones | 35 | .244 | .306 | .426 | .319 | 0.0 | -0.1 | -0.2 | 0.0 |
| Jordany Valdespin | 35 | .255 | .298 | .385 | .301 | -0.5 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .253 | .322 | .397 | .317 | -0.5 | 0.9 | 2.2 | 1.7 |
Christian Yelich had a fairly impressive debut in 2013, posting a 116 wRC+ and 1.4 WAR in just 62 games. He hit for little power, and struck out nearly 25% of the time, but that’s to be expected from a 21-year old in his first taste of big-league action. Steamer and ZiPS are fairly torn on Yelich, the former seeing him as a 1.2-win player, the latter as a 2.1-win player. Steamer sees his offense declining quite a bit, and his defense dropping off some as well. ZiPS sees a lesser decline in offensive production and a significant increase in defensive prowess. Yelich’s .380 BABIP isn’t that sustainable, so some offensive decline is certainly to be expected. All signs point to him being a promising young outfielder, but it’s unlikely he will make much of an upward move in 2014.
#17 Brewers
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khris Davis | 511 | .251 | .328 | .447 | .339 | 7.9 | -0.5 | -3.0 | 1.5 |
| Logan Schafer | 140 | .246 | .301 | .363 | .295 | -2.7 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
| Caleb Gindl | 28 | .255 | .317 | .411 | .320 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.2 | 0.0 |
| Sean Halton | 21 | .243 | .298 | .392 | .303 | -0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Josh Prince | 14 | .224 | .292 | .327 | .279 | -0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Kevin Mattison | 14 | .203 | .267 | .317 | .260 | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Total | 728 | .248 | .320 | .423 | .326 | 3.8 | -0.5 | -2.2 | 1.6 |
Jeez, move Ryan Braun to right field, and suddenly the Brewers have a below-average left field. Who would have thought? Oh, you would have. Good job. Khris Davis did his best to replace Braun’s power when Braun “went up north to live on a farm” for much of the 2013 season. Davis posted an unworldly .316 ISO over 153 PA, and owned a 160 wRC+ for the season. Davis did have impressive power numbers in the minors, though not to this extent, and the projections have sniffed that out. He’ll get most of the opportunities in left, mostly due to a lack of other options. Davis is an interesting case in that while his 2013 power is almost certainly not sustainable, the sample is simply too low for us to really say by how much.
Logan Schafer will also see some time in left, but he should only be a defensive replacement at any outfield position. A career .336 SLG won’t turn any heads, but as a late-scratch fill-in, or late-inning replacement, he should fill in fine.
#18 Red Sox
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Nava | 280 | .263 | .347 | .395 | .330 | 1.3 | -0.2 | -1.6 | 0.6 |
| Jonny Gomes | 280 | .241 | .337 | .419 | .333 | 1.8 | 0.0 | -2.8 | 0.6 |
| Mike Carp | 105 | .259 | .322 | .440 | .333 | 0.7 | -0.1 | -0.6 | 0.3 |
| Grady Sizemore | 35 | .232 | .291 | .383 | .297 | -0.7 | -0.1 | -0.3 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .252 | .337 | .410 | .330 | 3.0 | -0.4 | -5.3 | 1.4 |
Daniel Nava and Jonny Gomes should make for adequate platoon partners, but none of them will see enough playing time in left field for them to rank any higher on this list. Nava will also play some right and maybe some first, while Gomes will split his time between left and some DH, while also filling a role as a pinch hitter. Gomes has performed well against lefties over his career (136 wRC+), but saw a substantial decline against southpaws in 2013 (115 wRC+). If those struggles continue, he might lose some playing time to Mike Carp, though Carp hasn’t mashed against lefties either. The projections call for Gomes to sustain his production and for Nava to fall off a bit. Add Carp and a sprinkle of Grady Sizemore to the mix, and the left field of the defending champs could be better, but won’t hurt them enough to negate their production at other positions.
#19 Orioles
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Lough | 490 | .267 | .305 | .396 | .306 | -6.6 | 0.2 | 4.4 | 1.0 |
| Nolan Reimold | 70 | .232 | .297 | .398 | .305 | -1.0 | 0.0 | -0.4 | 0.0 |
| Steve Pearce | 70 | .248 | .333 | .408 | .326 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Nelson Cruz | 35 | .256 | .314 | .465 | .338 | 0.4 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 0.1 |
| Henry Urrutia | 35 | .286 | .325 | .415 | .325 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.2 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .262 | .308 | .402 | .310 | -6.9 | 0.1 | 3.7 | 1.4 |
David Lough is a prototypical glove-first fourth outfielder. The Orioles, however, have decided that he deserves a shot in an everyday role in left field. It’s not the worst move, as Lough should provide enough value with his glove to keep his spot, assuming Steve Pearce and his lefty-mashing ways (I know, small sample) force Baltimore’s higher-ups to force a platoon. We have Nelson Cruz projected for 35 LF plate appearances, but that would be 35 too many at this point, though a long season can bring out the crazy in every team sometimes. Lough is a corner outfielder who will bat 7th or 8th in the lineup. What he’ll do seems a whole lot easier to guess than how to actually pronounce his last name.
#20 Mariners
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dustin Ackley | 525 | .256 | .331 | .373 | .312 | -2.6 | 0.5 | -0.6 | 1.0 |
| Michael Saunders | 70 | .234 | .314 | .392 | .312 | -0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Logan Morrison | 35 | .245 | .331 | .413 | .326 | 0.2 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.1 |
| Corey Hart |
35 | .254 | .315 | .438 | .328 | 0.3 | 0.0 | -0.4 | 0.1 |
| Abraham Almonte | 35 | .245 | .308 | .360 | .297 | -0.6 | 0.1 | -0.2 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .253 | .327 | .380 | .313 | -3.1 | 0.7 | -1.2 | 1.3 |
Ooof. Oh boy. I mean … just … yikes. I mean, that basically sums up the bad news. The good news is that Ackley had a fairly-good second half, powered mostly by a strong August, and has continued to hit in Spring Training this season. I know, but I don’t have a lot to work with here. Saunders, too, saw a resurgence in the second half of 2013, and there was some news that perhaps he was playing through some injury problems to start the season. The two aren’t platoon partners, so they will probably begin the season in competition for the job in a race to suck less. Corey Hart will start the season in RF most likely, and Morrison is more of a 1B/DH guy at this point, but then again who isn’t on this team. Happy 2014, Mariners fans.
#21 Twins
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Willingham | 525 | .232 | .341 | .427 | .339 | 8.4 | -1.3 | -6.4 | 1.3 |
| Jason Kubel | 84 | .232 | .306 | .391 | .304 | -0.9 | -0.2 | -0.5 | 0.0 |
| Chris Herrmann | 49 | .221 | .288 | .317 | .272 | -1.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.1 |
| Darin Mastroianni | 42 | .233 | .299 | .307 | .274 | -1.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .231 | .331 | .407 | .326 | 4.2 | -1.4 | -6.9 | 1.2 |
Until Ricky Nolasco came along this year, Josh Willingham was the highest-paid free agent in Minnesota Twins history. At the time of the signing, it seemed like a decent move. His power stroke played well in Target Field and he slugged his way to a 3.4-win season in 2012. This all came apart in 2013, as his wOBA dropped by 68 points, his strikeout rate hit a career high, and he only saw 111 games due to injury. The injury probably had some play in his declining stats, as well, and the projections seem to correct for this a bit. Still, neither system see him producing at the levels we’ve known him to in the past.
Jason Kubel will most likely see most of his time at DH, though he could back up Willingham here and there. The Twins also have about a billion mediocre outfielders floating around the minors that could fill in should Willingham succumb to injury again.
#22 White Sox
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alejandro De Aza | 385 | .262 | .323 | .396 | .317 | -2.1 | 0.5 | -0.6 | 0.7 |
| Dayan Viciedo | 280 | .262 | .311 | .432 | .324 | 0.1 | -0.4 | -1.6 | 0.5 |
| Jordan Danks | 28 | .230 | .309 | .360 | .299 | -0.5 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Adam Dunn | 7 | .207 | .318 | .420 | .324 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .260 | .318 | .410 | .319 | -2.6 | 0.1 | -2.2 | 1.2 |
Alejandro De Aza and Dayan Viciedo will most likely platoon in left field to start 2014, which is pretty gross if you cheer for the White Sox, but pretty great if you cheer for extremely cool names. Viciedo will most likely only appear versus lefties, which will leave the bulk of the work to De Aza. The projections see De Aza continuing his power/speed ways, but also he him continuing his trend of poor contact skills and bad on-base percentages. Luckily for both, they shouldn’t get any real competition at that position, since Adam Eaton will stick in center and Avisail Garcia should stay in right. In the battle of cool names; two men enter, one man leave, nobody produces.
#23 Blue Jays
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melky Cabrera | 490 | .288 | .331 | .432 | .332 | 3.7 | -0.2 | -4.0 | 1.1 |
| Kevin Pillar | 210 | .259 | .294 | .375 | .294 | -4.6 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .279 | .320 | .414 | .320 | -0.9 | -0.2 | -3.7 | 1.2 |
Melky Cabrera got good, then great, then busted, then hurt, then crappy. The last two probably have something to do with each other, but until we see how healthy Melky is to start the season, it will be hard to know how much. And even when he is healthy, what Melky will be there? If his 2012 campaign with the Giants wasn’t aided by PEDs, it certainly was aided by a .370 BABIP. The projections see a bit of a rebound for Cabrera, but certainly not near his season with the Giants or even his 2011 effort with the Royals.
Kevin Pillar is a speedy guy who can’t hit or get on base, so he will likely be a fourth outfielder or defensive replacement if he ever makes it back up from the minors. The job is Melky’s for now, and he is having a promising Spring, for whatever that is worth.
#24 Mets
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric Young | 490 | .243 | .311 | .332 | .289 | -8.7 | 4.0 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Curtis Granderson | 84 | .226 | .314 | .422 | .323 | 0.7 | 0.1 | -0.2 | 0.2 |
| Lucas Duda |
70 | .235 | .331 | .402 | .324 | 0.7 | -0.1 | -0.8 | 0.1 |
| Chris Young | 35 | .225 | .309 | .404 | .314 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Andrew Brown | 21 | .231 | .296 | .402 | .306 | -0.1 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .239 | .313 | .355 | .298 | -7.3 | 4.0 | -0.6 | 1.0 |
Eric Young has two things going for him right now — he’s fast and he’s not Lucas Duda. Both things technically make him valuable, but Young’s speed makes him a bit of a one-hit wonder. If he stays healthy, he’ll do well on the base paths. He will not get on base at a very good (or even decent) clip, and he certainly won’t hit for power. Even his gaudy 48 steals last year came at the price of 11 times caught, meaning he barely broke even when it comes to a productive base-swiping rate. He’ll stick in left for now, as the Mets have no real outfield prospects poised to breach the majors. Young could be swapped for Juan Lagares if the former’s hitting really takes a step back, or Lucas Duda could push Young out if Duda … sorry, can’t finish that sentence.
#25 Rays
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David DeJesus | 315 | .242 | .318 | .367 | .306 | -1.5 | -0.3 | -1.3 | 0.4 |
| Brandon Guyer | 140 | .251 | .305 | .384 | .304 | -0.9 | 0.3 | -0.5 | 0.2 |
| Logan Forsythe | 105 | .233 | .316 | .351 | .298 | -1.1 | 0.2 | -0.6 | 0.1 |
| Matt Joyce |
35 | .245 | .337 | .429 | .336 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| James Darnell |
35 | .235 | .306 | .389 | .306 | -0.2 | 0.0 | -0.2 | 0.0 |
| Total | 630 | .242 | .315 | .373 | .306 | -3.0 | 0.2 | -2.7 | 0.9 |
David DeJesus is a perfect kind of player for Joe Maddon and the Rays. He’s a capable, affordable, platoon-able outfielder. The only problem is, it’s not clear who would platoon with DeJesus, since neither Guyer, Forsythe, nor Joyce are all that formidable against lefties. Somebody could come to relevance, or DeJesus could simply be buried in the lineup against lefties, but the Rays will have to figure something out, and they probably will or probably already have. DeJesus won’t run or hit for power, but his defense and not-terrible hitting is good enough for the cash-strapped Rays at this point.
#26 Cubs
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Junior Lake | 385 | .255 | .300 | .384 | .302 | -6.3 | -0.1 | 2.5 | 0.4 |
| Ryan Sweeney | 70 | .265 | .324 | .401 | .319 | -0.2 | 0.0 | -0.3 | 0.1 |
| Justin Ruggiano | 175 | .251 | .316 | .429 | .327 | 0.6 | -0.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Darnell McDonald | 70 | .235 | .298 | .357 | .291 | -1.7 | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .253 | .306 | .394 | .309 | -7.7 | -0.5 | 2.0 | 0.8 |
Junior Lake looks a lot like Alfonso Soriano on the field — similar build, similar gate, similar swing. There isn’t really anything to take from that, it’s just something I noticed watching him in Arizona. He has speed, but will have trouble translating it since he won’t get on base that much. He strikes out far too much and walks far too little. He did provide adequate defense in Chicago in limited time last year, though he will have to really flash the leather to prove valuable in 2014. Luckily, the Cubs aren’t really looking toward 2014 as a competitive year, so they’ll have the time to watch and work with Lake all season. Though, if he really struggles, he might get sent back down for more seasoning and give up playing time to Justin Ruggiano.
#27 Tigers
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rajai Davis |
245 | .261 | .306 | .367 | .297 | -4.8 | 2.3 | -0.7 | 0.2 |
| Andy Dirks |
140 | .265 | .321 | .400 | .317 | -0.6 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Don Kelly | 140 | .244 | .312 | .363 | .301 | -2.3 | 0.1 | -0.2 | 0.1 |
| Trevor Crowe | 70 | .245 | .299 | .335 | .282 | -2.2 | 0.0 | -0.1 | -0.1 |
| Ezequiel Carrera | 70 | .254 | .304 | .333 | .285 | -2.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Steve Lombardozzi | 35 | .267 | .307 | .359 | .294 | -0.8 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .256 | .309 | .366 | .299 | -12.7 | 2.6 | -0.2 | 0.6 |
Rajai Davis is weird. He’s always shown good speed, but could never really parlay that into any defensive value. He hits about as well as a typical speedy guy will, and won’t be worth a whole heck of a lot in 2014. Andy Dirks is going to miss the beginning of the season with a back injury, so that means that the still-somehow-employed Don Kelly could see time in a platoon role with Davis. This is all assuming that the Nick Castellanos experiment at third base doesn’t fail and Castellanos isn’t sent to left field. Right now, left field in Detroit is a bit of a work-in-progress, with the work appearing to be some aggressive finger crossing.
#28 Giants
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Morse | 490 | .253 | .305 | .419 | .316 | 2.7 | -2.0 | -8.5 | 0.2 |
| Gregor Blanco | 175 | .239 | .321 | .331 | .293 | -2.3 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Juan Perez | 35 | .254 | .289 | .368 | .289 | -0.6 | -0.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| Total | 700 | .250 | .308 | .395 | .309 | -0.1 | -1.7 | -7.5 | 0.4 |
Yes, Michael Morse could bounce back to hitting like he did in Washington, or close to it. Yes, Gregor Blanco could continue to improve his on-base skills and crack the average-hitter threshold. But if you’re running a baseball team, do you really want to bet your team’s future on that? If you do, congratulations, you are just as smart as the Giants front office! Morse has trouble staying on the field, Blanco has trouble being worth more than a defensive replacement, and they both have trouble convincing me that the Giants left field situation will turn out any way north of “total dumpster fire.”
#29 Astros
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robbie Grossman | 490 | .234 | .323 | .338 | .299 | -7.3 | -0.6 | -3.0 | 0.0 |
| Marc Krauss | 140 | .224 | .309 | .381 | .306 | -1.3 | -0.1 | -0.8 | 0.1 |
| J.D. Martinez | 35 | .252 | .302 | .386 | .303 | -0.4 | 0.0 | -0.3 | 0.0 |
| L.J. Hoes | 35 | .266 | .333 | .360 | .310 | -0.2 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .235 | .319 | .350 | .301 | -9.2 | -0.7 | -4.2 | 0.2 |
The irrational Astros fan in me thinks Robbie Grossman should be worth at least a fraction of a win, but perhaps the numbers are right. He just looks like he should have more tools than he does. He gets on base OK, doesn’t hit for power, and — at least as far as one year’s worth of data shows — isn’t very valuable on defense. I will continue to hold on to hope, however. As my colleague Carson Cistulli put it in his FanGraphs+ write-up of Grossman, “Imagine David DeJesus, except maybe not quite as good and 10 years younger and also different in a thousand other ways. Maybe you’re thinking of Robbie Grossman.”
Marc Krauss would probably make a better lumberjack than baseball player, but baseball player pays better so I totally understand his reasoning. He has trouble getting on base, but does have some pop in his bat. He is having a fairly good Spring, though if he makes the team it will likely be as a part-time first baseman or backup outfielder.
J.D. Martinez got cut, so those two are about your only two options, though I have heard that Houston is looking to clone George Springer and have the both of him man the corners by the All-Star Break.
#30 Reds
| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Ludwick | 490 | .243 | .308 | .414 | .316 | -1.4 | -1.1 | -4.5 | 0.2 |
| Chris Heisey | 56 | .248 | .297 | .416 | .311 | -0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Skip Schumaker |
119 | .255 | .317 | .335 | .292 | -2.6 | -0.2 | -1.6 | -0.2 |
| Donald Lutz | 21 | .232 | .277 | .381 | .287 | -0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Thomas Neal |
14 | .262 | .319 | .379 | .309 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 700 | .245 | .307 | .399 | .310 | -5.0 | -1.2 | -6.1 | 0.1 |
Ryan Ludwick had some bad luck in 2013 as he separated his shoulder on opening day and wasn’t really the same after that. He’s also unlucky in that he continues to get older, but most of us drew bad cards in that respect. If his power returns, he could still reach 20ish home runs, but he’s a liability both on the basepaths and in the field. He might sniff league-average, but that’s probably his ceiling.
Ludwick and Chris Heisey project to be about the same player at this point, but hey, at least they’re not Skip Shumaker. If both Ludwick and Heisey really stink it up, Donald Lutz could see more playing time. He’s flashed power in the minors, though that came with poor on-base skills. Cincinnati’s outfield is a hot mess right now, save for Jay Bruce and potentially Billy Hamilton, so it’s unclear just what the plan is for 2014, but it probably won’t be very attractive.
David G. Temple is the Managing Editor of TechGraphs and a contributor to FanGraphs, NotGraphs and The Hardball Times. He hosts the award-eligible podcast Stealing Home. Dayn Perry once called him a "Bible Made of Lasers." Follow him on Twitter @davidgtemple.

This is weird. I actually had to scroll up to find Miami.
Red sox outfield projections feel weird. Maybe this is just what a logjam looks like, and I’m just stating the obvious (Mike Carp to Pirates). But the projected PA for these guys just seem like inefficient roster construction. I know it’s augmented by Nava/Gomes getting plate appearances at DH/1B, but that’s expected from platoon guys. In order to facilitate this PA distribution, Sizemore or Carp would have to spend significant time in the minors, and that just doesn’t seem reasonable. The 300 PA from Sizemore/Carp either need to be consolidated or given to some up and comers (Bryce Brentz, for example). Why keep Carp around for 100 trips to the dish?
Victorino: 525 PA
Nava: 490 PA
Gomes: 385 PA
Bradley: 455 PA
Sizemore: 175 PA
Carp: 135 PA
—
Brentz: 70 PA
Brown: 35 PA
Hassan: 35 PA
Note: this isn’t a commentary on the red sox roster. They’ll figure out a way to deal with it. This is more a comment that Fangraphs’ projected playing times seem unrealistic. Again, I find it highly unlikely that Mike Carp will get 130 PA.
Also Note: So how do you fix it? Heck if I know. If anything, I’d bump Bradley’s playing time down further (start year in AAA), and give those extra PA to Carp and Sizemore.
Your ‘Also Note:’ is the problem – it’s very difficult to find the best way to put together depth charts. It’d be a lot of work, but it would be interesting to see how these rankings would pan out using an optimized depth chart.
Taking the Mets as an example, it’s not optimal to give Eric Young a full season’s worth of at bats. If they went with Chris Young in Left, Juan Lagares in Center, Curtis Granderson in Right, they’d be projected for maybe 7.5 WAR. Adding the projections on the three rankings, they’re only projected for about 5.5 WAR due to the playing time given to Eric Young.
As you say with the Sox, the listed depth chart isn’t efficient – but you can’t just consolidate Sizemore/Carp. If Sizemore somehow stays healthy and he produces, maybe he’ll get 400 at bats. If he gets hurt or sucks, maybe he’ll get 50. Part of the distribution is hedging bets, playing averages, etc.
Optimization is a good perspective, but teams won’t be following the same algorithms. Most teams in contention are going to optimize for single-season WAR. The Astros are optimizing for future production. Some teams have too many (or too few..) players, and the only “reasonable” expectation is a trade (again see Carp, Mike).
I don’t know how you solve this problem when creating projected depth charts. The Fangraphs’ projections are basically saying “well if you average all of this together…”, which I suppose is one tactic, even if the numbers don’t look realistic at this level of detail.
I would love if FG published their guidelines for depth charts and how they handle these types of situations, what assumptions were made, etc.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. We could resolve these issues by incorporating the information provided by the confidence intervals for projections.
Well yeah, it’s highly unlikely that Grady Sizemore stays healthy long enough to spend “significant” time in the minors.
“Since the beginning of the 20th century, only three players have been worth more wins through their age-20 season than Harper — Mel Ott, Ty Cobb, and Al Kaline.”
I assume you mean only three ‘offensive’ players? Dwight Gooden put up 17 WAR through his age-20 season.
Plus something is wrong with the filters on the leaderboard. Filtering through age 20 Mike Trout doesn’t show up, but then filtering through age 21 he shows up with 21.1 WAR.
It’s a minimum PA thing, somehow — lower the threshold from “Qualified” and Trout pops up ahead of Harper, as does Alex Rodriguez.
You’re including his age 21 season if you do through 21. Harper hasn’t yet played his age 21 season.
Garrett Jones departure has nothing to do with Jose Tabata getting time in LF. PNC’s LF is massive and they never let Jones anywhere near it.
Jones leaving freed up RF time, that’s it.
I took this to mean that without Jones, there’d be more innings in right for Travis Snider (and for Tabata), which would leave more innings in left for Tabata.
I get the first step your scenario, but the second part baffles me. Based on how Hurdle played Marte last year, the only time Tabata gets any time at all in left is (1) when Marte is slumping and Hurdle wants to give him a day off, which happened maybe 3 times, or (2) when Marte is hurt. For a guy who gets hit as much as Marte does, it’s safe to assume that he’ll miss some time, which would give Tabata PAs, because Tabata’s the only guy on the ML roster who can come close to handling PNC’s left field. But Travis Snider getting more innings in right wouldn’t, in-turn, make more innings for Tabata in left. A healthy Marte, performing as projected here, will never sit for Tabata. Any innings that Tabata gets in left, he’d get even if Jones were still loping helplessly around in right.
The bottom 10 or so here seems brutal. Surprising there aren’t better options out there for a lot of those teams.
I wonder if the massive positional adjustment for leftfielders doesn’t need some work now, with fewer teams running Lucas Duda/Manny Ramirez-type defenders out there. Or maybe the position simply lacks talent.
I think I agree that the adjustment should be tweaked. It would require someone with more knowledge than I have to really speak to this, but it seems to me that CF is not inherently that much more difficult than LF/RF. On that basis, it is not justified to have a huge positional adjustment difference between the positions.
Here is another big problem for LF/RF players: The prototypical player for these spots used to be the no-glove all-bat players you mention, like Manny. What this means is that the average defensive ratings at those positions are very low. Being a guy with a bad glove would make you an approximately average fielder at LF. Therefore, it is assumed replacement-level hitting would be good at the corners, because teams were willing to stick any player there, regardless of his defensive abilities.
Now, I think many teams are putting some very good defenders at the corners, at the cost of some offense. Therefore, we would expect that the average corner outfielder is no less valuable than he used to be. The problem is, this effect will decrease the overall WAR of the corner outfielders. Since average-level is much higher now at the corners, a good defender in LF will get less WAR bonus for his defense because his peers are also better. However, he will be compared offensively against all of baseball, which has not traded in offense for defense to the same extent at other positions compared to RF/LF.
So basically, the bar for corner OF defense has increased dramatically, but corner OF have not had a corresponding increase in WAR, relative to the league, because they are only being compared against one another in defensive ratings.
In case it is not clear, the prescription I am making then is to bring up the positional penalty for corner OF. Since the defensive bar to play there is now higher (and closer the bar at CF) than it used to be, the defensive adjustment should be closer to that of CF. We would also expect the offensive bar to be a bit lower, because some all-bat no-glove players that may have had a job in the past are now being replaced by great-glove players who don’t have as good a bat. Therefore, replacement-level offense has decreased, so corner OFs shouldn’t be penalized as strongly for their position, as the offensive bar to play there is lower.
If they were truly better defenders though it should show up in their defensive, and therefore overall, WAR. It does not appear to be. If they were so much better than the penalty assumes they are, the difference should be made up, and it clearly is not. I think the problem is just that a lot of these guys are just not great defenders while also not being great hitters.
I guess it seems that teams are just putting warm bodies out there and hoping for the best. But who in the bottom 10 seem to have much upside defensively or offensively? Ackley seems like the only one, and he is #20, so that stands to reason he seems best. But teams could throw a seemingly 4A masher or an all glove guy out there at least as potential upside plays, but instead run out the Eric Yoiungs and Ryan Ludwicks of the world to virtually guarantee a lack of production. That just doesn’t seem to make a lot of sense to me.
No, because positional fielding value is calculated relative to average at that position. If ALL left fielder improve their defense, then none of them see a marginal increase in WAR.
It definitely looks like their are some lousy corner OF situations, so it’s possible we’re at a point where those positions just happen to be less deep than others, but I think the positional adjustment is part of it anyway.
“Crawford is now four seasons removed from his last truly productive season, and projects to be a two-win player.”
Was his 2.9 fWAR season last year not truly productive? It wasn’t a good season, but it was above average and really helped out the Dodgers after not having a good LF season since Manny left.
It wasn’t the kind of season Crawford is known for. Crawford has exceeded 4 WAR in five different seasons, but now it’s hard to imagine him ever doing that again. 15 stolen bases seems pretty mediocre for a guy that has seven times reached 46 SB.
I definitely agree that Crawford did a lot in 2013 to counter the narrative that he is finished. I think we can safely say he will never be 2010 Crawford again, but at his age, that is pretty typical.
As it stands now, Ackley and Saunders probably won’t be competing directly for LF time. Ackley will get most LF PAs, Hart will DH (even the M’s figured out he can’t limp out to RF every day), and Saunders will rotate between right and center, managing something of a platoon between Almonte (in CF) and Romero (in right). Morrison? Full time 1b once Smoak hits .211 for a couple of months? I don’t know. Maybe they’ll put him at shortstop and ship out both Franklin and Miller. This is the M’s.
“pretty great if you cheer for extremely cool names.”
Sounds like you’re asking me to revive the COOL NAMES POWER RANKINGS!
…he was!
The only thing that will keep Carlos Gonzalez from topping this list at the end of the season will be a trip to the DL.
So, basically, you’re saying Car-Go will not be at the top of the list 😉
You must hate the Rays, ranking them so low in LF. After all, they’ve got … Oh, forget it.
As a Dodger fan, I’m not sure I agree with the assessment of Ethier as “streaky”. Last year, during the wave of injuries the Dodgers faces, he and Adrian Gonzalez were the only players to qualify for the batting title, and both put up a solid 3 wins, Ethier doing it largely under the radar. Every season since 2008, Ethier has put up 2.5 +- 0.6 WAR, a wRC+ between 120 and 132, and reached 551 PA. I would actually describe him as remarkably consistent.
Now, if you define all his PA against LHP as one streak and all his PA against RHP as another, then he’s arguably the streakiest player in baseball.
You can be a streaky player and have consistent yearly results. That’s precisely what Ethier is.
First of all, every player is streaky within a season, depending on how you cut up their PA. That’s not to say there is no variation in “streakiness”, I’m just saying let’s make sure we don’t mistake the ups and downs of a season for a player who is legitimately streaky.
Secondly, if we’re discussing season-long projections, which we are, then it doesn’t really matter if a player is streaky within a season. His season-to-season variation in performance is what is relevant, and Ethier has not shown any propensity for such season-long streaks.
Is it fair to say that this is a down time for Left Fielders in general? 12 teams with a > 2.0 WAR projection, 16 1.7 WAR or lower, when 2.0 is supposed to be average? 12 players projected at 2.0 and above?
Not to be that guy, but the Gardner projection looks low across the board. He’s expected to lose 10 runs in LF defense and to post the worst AVG and OBP of his career as a regular.
Yeah, he turned 30, but that seems like a pretty drastic decline from his .270/.356/.387 line as a regular, especially coming off of the second best offensive season of his career.
Also, I doubt Harper stagnates offensively if he stays healthy all year.
“…irrational Astros fan…”
The third word is an abbreviated version of the first, and the middle word is not to be spoken in polite company.
Didn’t Justin Upton have the second longest average home run distance last year? Kind of selling him short if you attribute his high HR total simply due to luck.
That guy makes no sense to me. (J-Up, that is.) Last year, it seemed like he crushed a dozen 450-foot homers in the first few weeks of the season, but then barely matched it the rest of the year combined. Stats-wise, he does have a history of putting up 17-homer seasons with his ISO down by 50-100 points, so it’s hard to know what to expect.
Junior Lake has a similar gate to Soriano? I fail to see how that is relevant. Unless, of course, you mean he has a similar gait.
David LOUGH: rhymes with Charlie HOUGH (pronounced ‘ho’). ‘Cept I think Hough’s a pimp career-wise in comparison. Seriously though (rhymes with LOUGH), David Lough for Baltimore is Nate McLouth 2.0… just cheaper and better defense.
so you’re telling me that for Charlie Hough’s whole career they were mispronouncing his name? that’s certainly possible but the man pitched over 20 years. I watched baseball when he played and everyone said Charlie “Huff”
I would bet Viciedo will still get more PA than De Aza.
Isn’t that a bit harsh of an assessment on Gregor Blanco? He’s pretty much always been worth 2 WAR or prorated to 2 WAR if given 600 PA (1.1 WAR in 269 PA in 2010) after 2008 (his rookie season). That seems better than a pure defensive replacement?
I love the difference between Gentry’s description in this and in the RF rankings
Any hope for Ludwick’s season?
Melky Cabrera is a solid pick for comeback player of the year. Dude hit better than .280 with a tumour in his back and no legs – that in itself is pretty astounding. This spring he’s been barreling virtually everything up, and more importantly actually moving around the field without giving the impression that he’s running on a bed of needles with a piano on his back. I’m pretty confident he’s going to smash the projections.
Alex Gordon’s concussion last summer did have something to do with his decline, so might do a little better than projections suggest. Will also hit in the 5-hole rather than lead off and will have a better bat behind him than Alcides Escobar with four good OBP guys ahead of him to set the table.
I have a tough time envisioning Grossman batting .234. His contact issues aren’t that severe and he’s likely to carry a high BABIP with his LD%, IFFB%, and speed. Paired with a potentially gaudy BB% and solid baserunning, I think there’s a good chance that he’s an above average offensive player.
It remains to be seen how he turns out defensively, but we’re looking at a pretty small sample size right now and nearly half of it was due to a rough couple hundred innings in center field. Can’t think of a reason somebody with his range would struggle in left, but I suppose anything’s possible.
“He’ll stick in left for now, as the Mets have no real outfield prospects poised to breach the majors.”
Cesar Puello: Sickles believes in him, and he crushed AA last year before the Biogenesis suspension. He should be up in 2014, and could be an impact player (or a replacement level scrub, of course).
http://www.minorleagueball.com/2014/1/13/5303318/new-york-mets-top-20-prospects-for-2014
Any way to factor in variance and then plot that? For example, Justin Upton could explode and be really good as he’s been before, or he could be pretty terrible. Other players like Votto are who they are pretty consistently. Maybe plot the variance with overlaps?
Assuming an injury-free season, Matte’s projection is off by half. He has always had high BABIP rates Given his track record, the only reason to identify Marte’s 2013 BABIP rate a fluke is that any significant deviation from the mean appears to be a fluke. The issue with Marte is whether he can master the strkezone. If he mamages that, then he become a 6-7 win player.