2022 ZiPS Projections: Boston Red Sox

After having typically appeared in the hallowed pages of Baseball Think Factory, Dan Szymborski’s ZiPS projections have now been released at FanGraphs for a decade. The exercise continues this offseason. Below are the projections for the Boston Red Sox.

Batters

By winning 92 games, the Red Sox comfortably exceeded most expectations for the team in 2021. How do they do it again? There’s a path available, though not all the elements are in the organization right now.

The part Boston already has sorted is the offensive players who did the most to push the team to fourth in the American League in runs scored. Rafael Devers, Xander Bogaerts, and Enrique Hernández are back, and there’s no reason to expect any kind of decline from the first two, while Hernández isn’t remotely in the steep decline phase yet. Alex Verdugo, J.D. Martinez, and the catcher tandem are projected to give roughly league-average performances, hardly surprising results. There may be some grumbling about JDM’s projection, but even if ZiPS can mostly overlook his mess of a 2020 — wouldn’t it be nice if we could all forget that year? — it can’t forget that he’s also a 34-year-old designated hitter. Yes, David Ortiz aged incredibly well (and ZiPS was weirdly optimistic he would), but most players of the type do not. Martinez shouldn’t be a problem in 2022, but the day when that will become likely is coming.

The weakest parts of the lineup, at least if you agree with the projections, are apparent: center field, left field, and first base. Yes, Jackie Bradley Jr. had a terrific short 2020 (ZiPS saw that season as a drastic over-performance of his peripheral data from that campaign), but before that season, it looked like he was in steady decline, and he was abysmal for the Brewers last year. Bobby Dalbec has flashed considerable power at first base, but there’s just not much else there. And if you’re going to be competitive as a one-dimensional hitter at first, that dimension better be universe-shaking, not just merely good. If the Red Sox don’t make a short-term move here, I hope Triston Casas is called up very quickly if he’s hitting in Triple-A; ZiPS isn’t projecting him to be amazing, but his upside is much higher than Dalbec’s.

I’m less worried about the hole in left, because while I can imagine the Red Sox just rolling with JBJ and Dalbec, I don’t believe that they’d actually enter the season with Jarren Duran and Christin Stewart getting the at-bats in left. Honestly, I think they’d put Hernández out there and start Christian Arroyo at second before doing that. This is one place I expect them to be active when the offseason resumes, and I’ll be very disappointed if they are not.

There’s not much excitement in the high minors here, and the bench is a little light, though that’s another place I expect the Red Sox to make some low-key additions.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Pitchers

One of the keys to the Red Sox exceeding expectations in 2021 was the rotation’s health. With only Nick Pivetta spared some kind of significant injury history, the ability of the team to use their desired starting pitchers was easily the most significant source of variation in Boston’s preseason projections. In the simulations where they got lucky with the health of pitchers like Nathan Eovaldi, Garrett Richards, and Chris Sale, the Red Sox frequently won around 90 games. When they didn’t, the organization’s lack of impact high-level arms caused the wheels to come off very quickly.

In 2021, the team got the health they needed. Only seven pitchers received multiple starts for Boston, and while not all of them were great, the rotation was stable. And it was enough. But it’s a hard thing to count on for a second straight season; my cats don’t push a glass balanced on the edge of the counter to the kitchen floor every time, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to entrust them with the care of those glasses. James Paxton was a fun pickup, but he’s yet another pitcher with an injury history. The projections are more stable this year because ZiPS is simply more sold on some of the backup plans, but it still would be nice if the Red Sox had another durable pitcher on the roster.

Another element of Boston’s 2021 success was a very solid bullpen, and that’s one thing ZiPS sees persisting into the coming season. A lot of the pitchers on the team improved their long-term projected outlook (Garrett Whitlock, Darwinzon Hernandez, Josh Taylor), and while no one gets the kind of dominating projection to put them in elite territory, there’s a lot of very good performance expected from bow to almost stern. Perhaps an additional arm at the back of the rotation would help, but with the Red Sox accumulating a lot of maybe-healthy starting pitchers, they may have one or two of those names to fatten the relief corps in a swing role.

I’m calling the Red Sox for mid-80s wins as of right now, but I think they’ll likely add two or three wins in left, and either something more creative in center or another workhorse starter before it’s all said and done.

Ballpark graphic courtesy Eephus League. Depth charts constructed by way of those listed here.

Batters – Standard
Player B Age PO PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS
Rafael Devers L 25 3B 672 607 107 172 41 2 37 116 57 141 6 5
Xander Bogaerts R 29 SS 622 550 88 158 38 1 26 89 62 113 7 1
Enrique Hernández R 30 2B 540 477 75 126 28 3 22 67 50 105 2 0
Kyle Schwarber L 29 LF 497 424 72 109 23 2 30 81 66 130 2 2
Alex Verdugo L 26 LF 568 514 76 150 33 2 13 57 46 89 7 2
J.D. Martinez R 34 LF 591 527 78 143 32 2 25 86 55 136 1 0
José Iglesias R 32 SS 510 482 58 138 32 3 7 54 19 67 6 3
Christian Vazquez R 31 C 486 448 52 116 22 1 11 50 31 87 6 4
Yairo Muñoz R 27 3B 385 359 43 102 20 2 8 36 19 68 12 4
David Hamilton L 24 SS 481 445 48 102 21 4 8 35 32 108 33 5
Bobby Dalbec R 27 1B 489 438 56 100 20 3 25 71 39 172 3 1
Triston Casas L 22 1B 433 385 58 97 19 2 16 51 39 101 5 2
Christian Arroyo R 27 2B 222 203 26 51 12 1 7 28 12 52 2 0
Jarren Duran L 25 CF 481 443 55 113 19 5 11 41 30 122 22 6
Jonathan Araúz B 23 2B 401 359 51 84 17 1 10 42 33 81 2 1
Travis Shaw L 32 3B 363 316 36 70 16 0 13 48 40 94 1 1
Christin Stewart L 28 RF 439 393 48 96 22 3 20 68 37 116 1 1
Christian Koss R 24 SS 457 422 49 102 19 3 10 40 25 100 7 3
Rob Refsnyder R 31 CF 274 245 33 62 14 1 6 28 25 69 1 1
Kevin Plawecki R 31 C 183 164 17 42 10 1 3 19 14 31 0 0
Jackie Bradley Jr. L 32 CF 458 410 53 90 24 3 10 44 35 128 8 2
Danny Santana B 31 1B 391 360 52 89 19 4 16 50 23 110 13 5
Connor Wong R 26 C 351 328 38 74 16 3 12 41 19 122 7 2
Chad De La Guerra L 29 3B 231 212 24 48 11 1 7 21 17 68 4 1
Taylor Motter R 32 3B 326 289 37 63 14 2 11 35 32 81 2 2
Ronaldo Hernández R 24 C 423 397 44 95 21 2 12 47 15 87 2 1
Joey Meneses R 30 RF 416 382 49 97 20 1 12 49 26 92 0 0
Ryan Fitzgerald L 28 SS 438 402 45 93 20 3 9 41 28 107 4 5
Franchy Cordero L 27 LF 428 389 57 92 23 3 12 50 35 137 9 2
Jack López R 29 2B 338 310 41 75 14 1 7 32 17 80 10 2
Nick Sogard B 24 2B 352 317 37 76 12 1 7 29 25 72 8 4
Jeter Downs R 23 SS 454 409 51 87 18 2 14 45 32 130 17 4
Grant Williams L 26 2B 368 343 33 85 15 2 3 24 18 48 7 6
Ricardo Cubillan B 24 2B 101 89 10 19 3 1 1 5 10 24 1 1
Michael Gettys R 26 CF 412 379 46 76 20 3 14 50 24 149 10 4
Chris Herrmann L 34 C 166 147 17 31 6 1 4 16 16 51 0 0
Cameron Cannon R 24 2B 427 402 49 99 24 1 8 39 18 70 5 3
Josh Ockimey L 26 1B 402 343 51 71 15 1 15 44 51 136 0 1
Jett Bandy R 32 C 198 180 21 38 7 0 6 19 10 54 0 1
Jeremy Rivera B 27 SS 329 305 31 71 11 1 5 21 18 74 6 2
Devlin Granberg R 26 RF 443 407 52 100 21 2 10 44 24 96 4 2
Hudson Potts R 23 3B 381 350 39 77 16 1 10 37 19 118 0 0
Kole Cottam R 25 C 302 271 30 57 14 1 7 26 22 98 0 1
Johan Mieses R 26 RF 387 350 42 74 13 1 14 43 27 105 3 1
Pedro Castellanos R 24 LF 439 403 49 100 19 1 10 42 23 86 4 5
Tyreque Reed R 25 1B 403 362 47 79 19 0 12 42 31 125 2 2
Tanner Nishioka R 27 2B 234 213 23 47 11 0 4 20 11 72 2 1
Tate Matheny R 28 RF 316 293 32 61 13 1 7 28 19 109 7 3
Wil Dalton R 24 RF 369 340 39 62 13 1 9 33 24 110 2 2
Jeisson Rosario L 22 CF 452 404 59 88 16 2 6 34 41 122 9 5

Batters – Advanced
Player BA OBP SLG OPS+ ISO BABIP RC/27 Def WAR No. 1 Comp
Rafael Devers .283 .348 .540 131 .257 .315 7.0 -7 3.7 Eric Chavez
Xander Bogaerts .287 .360 .502 125 .215 .321 6.9 -6 3.6 Ken McMullen
Enrique Hernández .264 .339 .474 113 .210 .297 5.9 4 2.8 Mark Ellis
Kyle Schwarber .257 .360 .533 133 .276 .299 6.9 -1 2.5 Mike Epstein
Alex Verdugo .292 .350 .440 108 .148 .333 5.9 4 1.9 Ryan Sweeney
J.D. Martinez .271 .342 .482 115 .211 .322 6.1 -2 1.7 Jim Rice
José Iglesias .286 .320 .409 92 .122 .321 5.0 0 1.3 Freddy Sanchez
Christian Vazquez .259 .308 .386 83 .127 .300 4.3 5 1.3 Cody Mckay
Yairo Muñoz .284 .324 .418 95 .134 .332 5.2 1 1.0 Omar Infante
David Hamilton .229 .283 .348 67 .119 .286 4.0 7 0.9 Zach Sorensen
Bobby Dalbec .228 .303 .459 98 .231 .311 4.9 2 0.7 Kevin Witt
Triston Casas .252 .325 .436 100 .184 .302 5.1 1 0.7 Chris Pritchett
Christian Arroyo .251 .309 .424 92 .172 .306 4.8 2 0.7 Bret Boone
Jarren Duran .255 .308 .395 85 .140 .329 4.7 -2 0.6 Bubba Crosby
Jonathan Araúz .234 .298 .370 76 .136 .276 3.9 5 0.6 Jason Bates
Travis Shaw .222 .315 .396 87 .174 .273 4.3 0 0.6 Wayne Gross
Christin Stewart .244 .317 .468 104 .224 .296 5.3 -4 0.5 John-Ford Griffin
Christian Koss .242 .289 .372 74 .130 .295 3.8 3 0.5 Ron Gardenhire
Rob Refsnyder .253 .325 .392 89 .139 .329 4.6 0 0.4 Shane Spencer
Kevin Plawecki .256 .330 .384 89 .128 .300 4.6 -2 0.4 Jerry Grote
Jackie Bradley Jr. .220 .293 .366 74 .146 .294 3.8 3 0.3 Eric Fox
Danny Santana .247 .297 .456 96 .208 .312 4.9 -1 0.2 Chris Jones
Connor Wong .226 .274 .402 76 .177 .320 3.9 -2 0.2 Lee Evans
Chad De La Guerra .226 .290 .387 78 .160 .299 4.0 1 0.2 Seth Bynum
Taylor Motter .218 .298 .394 82 .176 .264 4.0 0 0.2 Tom Brookens
Ronaldo Hernández .239 .275 .393 74 .154 .279 3.8 -2 0.1 Scott Ackerman
Joey Meneses .254 .303 .406 86 .152 .306 4.4 2 0.1 Tim Costo
Ryan Fitzgerald .231 .286 .363 71 .132 .294 3.5 1 0.0 Tripp Cromer
Franchy Cordero .237 .304 .404 86 .167 .333 4.5 -2 0.0 Marvin Garrison
Jack López .242 .287 .361 71 .119 .305 3.9 0 -0.1 Steve Sisco
Nick Sogard .240 .298 .350 72 .110 .290 3.7 1 -0.1 Erik Laseke
Jeter Downs .213 .273 .369 68 .156 .275 3.7 -2 -0.1 Jayson Nix
Grant Williams .248 .290 .329 64 .082 .281 3.3 4 -0.2 Luis Ordaz
Ricardo Cubillan .213 .297 .303 61 .090 .281 3.0 0 -0.2 Manuel Ferrer
Michael Gettys .201 .254 .380 65 .179 .287 3.3 4 -0.2 Barry Wesson
Chris Herrmann .211 .291 .347 69 .136 .293 3.5 -2 -0.2 Jerry Goff
Cameron Cannon .246 .289 .371 73 .124 .281 3.8 -2 -0.2 Brent Butler
Josh Ockimey .207 .313 .388 85 .181 .292 4.1 -1 -0.2 Steve Carver
Jett Bandy .211 .274 .350 64 .139 .267 3.2 -2 -0.3 Chad Moeller
Jeremy Rivera .233 .279 .325 60 .092 .292 3.3 0 -0.3 Milko Jaramillo
Devlin Granberg .246 .301 .381 80 .135 .299 4.1 -1 -0.4 Dionys Cesar
Hudson Potts .220 .265 .357 63 .137 .302 3.3 2 -0.4 Matthew Moses
Kole Cottam .210 .280 .347 65 .137 .301 3.2 -4 -0.5 Yohanny Valera
Johan Mieses .211 .278 .374 71 .163 .260 3.6 1 -0.5 Garrick Haltiwanger
Pedro Castellanos .248 .297 .375 77 .127 .293 3.8 -2 -0.7 Sergio Cairo
Tyreque Reed .218 .287 .370 73 .152 .298 3.6 0 -0.8 Dustin Brisson
Tanner Nishioka .221 .275 .329 59 .108 .314 3.1 -6 -1.0 Chad Spann
Tate Matheny .208 .260 .331 56 .123 .305 3.0 0 -1.1 Jamar Hill
Wil Dalton .182 .242 .306 44 .124 .240 2.4 3 -1.6 B.J. Garbe
Jeisson Rosario .218 .293 .312 61 .094 .297 3.1 -12 -1.8 Jason Denham

Pitchers – Standard
Player T Age W L ERA G GS IP H ER HR BB SO FIP
Nathan Eovaldi R 32 11 6 3.73 29 27 154.3 149 64 18 37 166 3.38
Chris Sale L 33 7 4 3.53 18 18 91.7 80 36 11 25 116 3.29
Nick Pivetta R 29 9 8 4.89 32 27 143.7 137 78 23 58 148 4.52
James Paxton L 33 6 5 4.47 17 17 86.7 86 43 13 30 95 4.01
Garrett Whitlock R 26 7 4 3.87 37 5 76.7 72 33 8 25 77 3.66
Tanner Houck R 26 6 5 4.62 27 20 97.3 92 50 14 38 105 4.25
Rich Hill L 42 6 6 4.93 25 24 118.7 119 65 20 40 103 4.90
Garrett Richards R 34 6 5 4.84 31 18 109.7 116 59 17 41 94 4.68
Bryan Mata R 23 8 7 4.88 22 22 101.3 103 55 13 50 86 4.81
Josh Winckowski R 24 7 7 5.06 24 23 112.0 124 63 15 40 77 4.78
Victor Santos R 21 6 5 4.70 24 13 84.3 91 44 12 24 62 4.56
Kutter Crawford R 26 7 7 4.98 22 22 97.7 101 54 14 43 97 4.53
Adam Ottavino R 36 6 3 3.65 63 0 56.7 46 23 5 33 70 3.82
Matt Barnes R 32 7 4 3.79 60 1 54.7 42 23 7 28 78 3.64
Michael Wacha R 30 5 4 5.21 27 22 112.3 127 65 20 34 100 4.70
Raynel Espinal R 30 7 7 5.20 23 18 98.7 104 57 16 37 84 4.83
Martín Pérez L 31 8 7 5.28 32 22 116.0 132 68 18 46 89 4.98
Zack Kelly R 27 4 3 4.28 32 4 54.7 52 26 6 24 54 4.11
John Schreiber R 28 4 3 4.54 43 6 67.3 70 34 9 25 62 4.32
Brayan Bello R 23 5 5 5.43 21 21 111.0 123 67 19 43 79 5.28
Jay Groome L 23 6 6 5.30 20 20 88.3 94 52 14 38 74 5.03
Connor Seabold R 26 4 4 5.15 16 16 71.7 76 41 11 25 60 4.71
Josh Taylor L 29 2 1 3.93 61 0 52.7 46 23 6 22 64 3.65
Darwinzon Hernandez L 25 3 2 3.97 54 0 45.3 34 20 5 29 65 3.93
Chris Murphy L 24 6 6 5.44 21 20 91.0 99 55 17 37 77 5.33
Hirokazu Sawamura R 34 3 2 4.06 51 0 51.0 44 23 6 28 60 4.18
Andrew Politi R 26 7 7 5.28 24 13 75.0 78 44 10 42 66 4.99
Ryan Brasier R 34 3 2 3.96 42 0 38.7 37 17 5 13 37 4.03
Zac Grotz R 29 3 3 4.83 23 5 50.3 53 27 7 17 41 4.61
Hansel Robles R 31 4 3 4.50 67 0 64.0 60 32 10 27 68 4.45
Alex Claudio L 30 2 1 4.50 57 1 50.0 54 25 5 18 37 4.26
Eduard Bazardo R 26 3 3 4.86 24 3 46.3 48 25 8 17 42 4.91
Frank German R 24 6 6 5.62 24 18 83.3 96 52 14 35 54 5.51
Austin Davis L 29 2 2 4.56 47 0 51.3 48 26 6 25 54 4.23
Rio Gomez L 27 2 1 4.59 32 0 49.0 50 25 6 20 43 4.42
Seth Blair R 33 3 2 4.71 27 1 36.3 36 19 5 17 34 4.67
Daniel Gossett R 29 5 6 5.75 18 16 81.3 94 52 14 37 58 5.50
Brandon Workman R 33 3 3 4.63 46 0 44.7 40 23 7 27 49 4.90
Brian Keller R 28 3 4 5.64 23 13 67.0 73 42 11 35 57 5.36
Michael Feliz R 29 3 2 4.78 49 1 49.0 48 26 7 20 51 4.30
Dominic LoBrutto L 26 2 2 4.70 34 0 44.0 48 23 5 16 33 4.45
Brad Peacock R 34 3 4 5.63 22 11 54.3 57 34 11 22 51 5.31
Austin Brice R 30 2 2 5.01 41 2 46.7 46 26 7 21 44 4.98
Kyle Hart L 29 7 9 5.89 23 20 107.0 125 70 20 46 78 5.58
Jose Adames R 29 1 1 4.78 32 0 32.0 31 17 5 15 31 4.87
Matt Hall L 28 4 4 5.50 34 6 73.7 81 45 11 37 66 5.00
Caleb Simpson R 30 2 2 4.91 21 0 22.0 20 12 3 14 24 4.82
Brandon Brennan R 30 3 3 5.01 38 0 46.7 48 26 6 21 38 4.70
Geoff Hartlieb R 28 3 3 5.11 40 0 49.3 50 28 5 29 48 4.50
Durbin Feltman R 25 4 4 5.14 42 0 49.0 49 28 7 25 46 4.87
Kaleb Ort R 30 2 2 5.16 40 0 45.3 43 26 6 28 50 4.75
Joan Martinez R 25 2 2 5.22 34 0 39.7 38 23 5 27 40 5.00
Phillips Valdez R 30 3 3 5.65 41 6 71.7 78 45 12 37 61 5.45
Bobby Poyner L 29 2 2 5.48 34 1 42.7 46 26 9 16 39 5.43
Colten Brewer R 29 2 3 5.74 33 1 42.3 45 27 8 23 38 5.61

Pitchers – Advanced
Player K/9 BB/9 HR/9 BB% K% BABIP ERA+ ERA- WAR No. 1 Comp
Nathan Eovaldi 9.7 2.2 1.0 5.7% 25.7% .313 126 80 3.2 Shane Reynolds
Chris Sale 11.4 2.5 1.1 6.5% 30.3% .309 133 75 2.1 Dutch Leonard
Nick Pivetta 9.3 3.6 1.4 9.3% 23.8% .295 96 104 1.4 Kevin Foster
James Paxton 9.9 3.1 1.4 8.1% 25.6% .315 105 95 1.4 Andy Pettitte
Garrett Whitlock 9.0 2.9 0.9 7.7% 23.6% .302 121 83 1.3 Brad Clontz
Tanner Houck 9.7 3.5 1.3 9.0% 24.9% .301 101 99 1.2 Joe Cowley
Rich Hill 7.8 3.0 1.5 7.8% 20.0% .289 95 105 1.2 Tim Wakefield
Garrett Richards 7.7 3.4 1.4 8.5% 19.5% .304 97 103 1.1 Mike Boddicker
Bryan Mata 7.6 4.4 1.2 11.0% 18.9% .299 96 104 1.1 Mike Payne
Josh Winckowski 6.2 3.2 1.2 8.0% 15.5% .304 93 108 1.0 Cha Seung Baek
Victor Santos 6.6 2.6 1.3 6.6% 16.9% .299 100 100 1.0 John Hope
Kutter Crawford 8.9 4.0 1.3 9.9% 22.3% .315 94 106 0.9 Angel Guzman
Adam Ottavino 11.1 5.2 0.8 13.2% 28.0% .297 128 78 0.8 Jeff Nelson
Matt Barnes 12.8 4.6 1.2 12.0% 33.5% .297 124 81 0.8 Mark Clear
Michael Wacha 8.0 2.7 1.6 6.9% 20.3% .318 90 111 0.8 Brian Sweeney
Raynel Espinal 7.7 3.4 1.5 8.5% 19.4% .300 90 111 0.7 Chris Brock
Martín Pérez 6.9 3.6 1.4 8.8% 17.0% .313 89 112 0.7 Kent Mercker
Zack Kelly 8.9 4.0 1.0 10.0% 22.6% .303 110 91 0.6 Jay Robertson
John Schreiber 8.3 3.3 1.2 8.5% 21.0% .311 103 97 0.6 Hipolito Pichardo
Brayan Bello 6.4 3.5 1.5 8.7% 16.0% .298 86 116 0.6 Nate Minchey
Jay Groome 7.5 3.9 1.4 9.6% 18.7% .302 89 113 0.6 Justin Thompson
Connor Seabold 7.5 3.1 1.4 7.9% 19.0% .302 91 110 0.6 Felix Diaz
Josh Taylor 10.9 3.8 1.0 9.7% 28.3% .305 119 84 0.6 Will Ohman
Darwinzon Hernandez 12.9 5.8 1.0 14.4% 32.3% .296 118 85 0.5 John Rocker
Chris Murphy 7.6 3.7 1.7 9.1% 18.9% .303 86 116 0.5 Scott Lewis
Hirokazu Sawamura 10.6 4.9 1.1 12.4% 26.7% .297 116 87 0.5 Jason Kershner
Andrew Politi 7.9 5.0 1.2 12.2% 19.2% .306 89 113 0.4 Clint Nageotte
Ryan Brasier 8.6 3.0 1.2 7.9% 22.6% .296 119 84 0.4 Donn Pall
Zac Grotz 7.3 3.0 1.3 7.7% 18.6% .303 97 103 0.4 Jack Cressend
Hansel Robles 9.6 3.8 1.4 9.7% 24.5% .294 104 96 0.3 Richie Lewis
Alex Claudio 6.7 3.2 0.9 8.1% 16.7% .310 104 96 0.3 Jason Kershner
Eduard Bazardo 8.2 3.3 1.6 8.3% 20.6% .299 97 104 0.3 Mark Brandenburg
Frank German 5.8 3.8 1.5 9.2% 14.2% .303 84 120 0.3 Dan Smith
Austin Davis 9.5 4.4 1.1 11.0% 23.8% .302 103 97 0.2 Ed Glynn
Rio Gomez 7.9 3.7 1.1 9.3% 19.9% .306 102 98 0.2 Wilson Guzman
Seth Blair 8.4 4.2 1.2 10.6% 21.1% .301 100 100 0.2 Bryce Florie
Daniel Gossett 6.4 4.1 1.5 9.9% 15.5% .308 82 123 0.2 Dennis Tankersley
Brandon Workman 9.9 5.4 1.4 13.6% 24.6% .287 101 99 0.2 John Hudek
Brian Keller 7.7 4.7 1.5 11.4% 18.5% .308 83 120 0.2 Mike York
Michael Feliz 9.4 3.7 1.3 9.3% 23.8% .306 98 102 0.1 Greg Jones
Dominic LoBrutto 6.8 3.3 1.0 8.2% 16.8% .309 100 100 0.1 Dana Allison
Brad Peacock 8.4 3.6 1.8 9.1% 21.2% .299 83 120 0.1 Craig McMurtry
Austin Brice 8.5 4.1 1.4 10.0% 21.0% .295 94 107 0.1 Mike Butcher
Kyle Hart 6.6 3.9 1.7 9.4% 16.0% .309 80 126 0.1 Huck Flener
Jose Adames 8.7 4.2 1.4 10.6% 21.8% .292 98 102 0.1 Chad Harville
Matt Hall 8.1 4.5 1.3 10.9% 19.5% .318 85 117 0.0 Dennis Powell
Caleb Simpson 9.8 5.7 1.2 14.0% 24.0% .293 96 105 0.0 John Briscoe
Brandon Brennan 7.3 4.1 1.2 10.1% 18.3% .298 94 107 0.0 John Kiely
Geoff Hartlieb 8.8 5.3 0.9 12.8% 21.1% .317 92 109 -0.1 Mike MacDougal
Durbin Feltman 8.4 4.6 1.3 11.3% 20.8% .300 91 110 -0.1 Blaine Neal
Kaleb Ort 9.9 5.6 1.2 13.5% 24.2% .308 91 110 -0.1 Reggie Harris
Joan Martinez 9.1 6.1 1.1 14.8% 21.9% .303 90 111 -0.1 Josh Banks
Phillips Valdez 7.7 4.6 1.5 11.2% 18.4% .307 83 120 -0.1 William Ormond
Bobby Poyner 8.2 3.4 1.9 8.4% 20.5% .301 86 117 -0.1 Shawn Barton
Colten Brewer 8.1 4.9 1.7 11.9% 19.6% .301 82 122 -0.2 Keith Shepherd

Players are listed with their most recent teams wherever possible. This includes players who are unsigned, players who will miss 2022 due to injury, and players who were released in 2021. So yes, if you see Joe Schmoe, who quit baseball back in August to form a big band orchestra that only plays nu-metal versions of baroque cantatas, he’s still listed here intentionally. ZiPS is assuming a league with an ERA of 4.36, similar to the post-June substance-enforcement environment.

Both hitters and pitchers are ranked by projected zWAR, which is to say, WAR values as calculated by me, Dan Szymborski, whose surname is spelled with a z. WAR values might differ slightly from those that appear in the full release of ZiPS. Finally, I will advise anyone against — and might karate chop anyone guilty of — merely adding up WAR totals on a depth chart to produce projected team WAR. ZiPS is assuming that the designated hitter will continue in force in 2022.

ZiPS is agnostic about future playing time by design. For more information about ZiPS, please refer to this article, or get angry at Dan on Twitter.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

47 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

I don’t know what Tanner Houck has to do to convince everyone that he should get a rotation slot, but ZiPs is down on him, Eric thought his splitter wasn’t good enough for him to start and the Red Sox signed the Rays’ leftovers from last year (Hill, Wacha) which means there’s a decent chance he won’t start in the rotation. Normally you would think that this means he hasn’t shown results but he has fairly regularly gone 4-5 innings and done well. So I guess we’ll have to wait to find out how he would hold up over a full season.

I also suspect that Whitlock might be capable of starting long-term. I would guess they’re probably not going to experiment with that this year because they went ahead and signed a bunch of depth options but he has three functional pitches.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Didn’t they say they were going to prepare them both to start through at least part of ST? It’s not like Wacha is much of an impediment

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

I’m still a little surprised that Wacha got a raise from last year. Dude had a 5.51 xERA. So you’d think he wouldn’t be an impediment but $7M is standard money for a 5th starter.

tstats123
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I have a feeling Wacha was surprised too…

Matt
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Wacha dropped his cutter, changing his pitch mix, at the end of the season. His peripherals after the change improved greatly.

I too was surprised by the large raise, but I’m sure the late season change of results was the reason.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Matt

Eventually, if we keep predicting breakouts based on small samples, we’ll be right. But it’s also true that if we want to slice up someone’s season into roughly 5-week chunks, we can find a lot of small samples to bolster whatever theory we want.

ginaroyalsfan
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

True, but pitchers can and have made dramatic improvements in their results by figuring out how to mix their pitches properly or by picking up a new pitch that works well, The trick is to identify those pitchers getting results because they figured out how to better use their stuff as opposed to those who just had a good run for a bit.

clance
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I have a feeling the Sox might try and leverage a lot of their high variability or high injury risk potential starters in shorter bursts in tandem with each other. It seems like a natural progression in the pretty consistent decreasing workload of starters.

Have Eovaldi, Sale and Pivetta getting 5-7 innings (Pivetta likely on the lower end) and then have Houck and Whitlock who the team seems to plan on starting throw 3-5 innings with guys like Wacha, Hill and Paxton once healthy coming in relief with 2-4 innings of their own. It could let guys stuff play up and help manage workloads for injury risks or guys like Houck and Whitlock who aren’t used to running super high pitch counts.

This can be done without putting too much strain on the bullpen since when healthy you’d have 3 guys functioning as extended relievers to account for the starters eating fewer innings.

LMOTFOTEMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  clance

How many roster spots would this plan need?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  LMOTFOTE

This is something I have often wondered about. The Rays keep pushing the limits on it and I assume it’s going to blow up on them but it hasn’t yet. This year there is going to be a 13-pitcher limit, too.

clance
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It’s interesting because I actually feel like this seems more intuitive than what the Rays are doing. That potentially comes at the cost of several roster spots while this in theory can take up fewer while boosting flexibility because 3 spots typically filled by single inning relievers are instead filled by multi inning guys. If you pick the right players whose stuff will play up that could be extremely useful.

Even on nights with a normal start this could be extremely useful since the Sox can be much more conservative knowing they’ve got several guys who keep themselves prepared for multi inning stints mid game.

It also provides a convenient path for high level prospects to be more easily integrated into the major league team, they still get multiple innings but aren’t actually expected to give a full start.

The big potential negatives I see are performance and injuries since more innings are tied up by guys who fill multiple. I think there is some legitimacy to the performance question since not every mediocre starter will actually be able to be solid in relief. This isn’t a plan for a team with a great rotation though, it’s one for a team with solid pitching depth that either has a high ceiling with high variability that can be brought down in lower inning stints or is relatively mediocre in talent but also capable of playing up in those low inning stints. On injuries I think it’s unlikely to blow up enough to be a significant problem, but if it did I actually think that might be more easily handled for the same reason it is a convenient path to start getting prospects chances against major league talent. It also pretty much guarantees good starting depth since you’d have 3 active players capable of spot starts.

clance
4 years ago
Reply to  LMOTFOTE

I think it comes down to how many innings you get out of each guy. I see 5 guys in the low pitch count multi inning group and ordinarily those spots would be filled by 2 starters and 3 relievers. For your 4 and 5 starters I’d say 5 innings is a fair standard estimate and for the 3 relievers you get an inning each, so in total you could expect about 13 innings from those spots. If everyone averaged their low end innings expectation I listed this would fill 12 innings, so even conservatively (with health) it only requires 1 extra single inning reliever while in practice I’d expect you’d realistically save roster spots since guys are likely to at least be in the middle of those estimates (again, with health).

There would be an added issue that the team would have more players who cost them a chunk of innings if they get hurt or underperformed which could either require greater strain on the bullpen. If we assume guys average the middle of the innings estimates I gave but remove one of the 2-4 innings pitchers that actually covers 14 innings, so assuming guys throw more than a very conservative estimate you’d actually need multiple players hurt before this plan started making roster building more challenging.

What that leaves out is I also think this plan would make multi inning guys/starters much more easily replaceable than they are currently. Now when a starter gets hurt if you don’t have the active depth you need to call someone up, with this plan if a top end starter gets hurt you’ve got several legit major league pitchers to stretch out for spot starts. To replace them you would then call someone up, but instead of expecting a start from them all you really need is something in that 2-4 inning range which will likely be easier for an inexperienced player.

rounders
4 years ago
Reply to  clance

The greatest waste of arms is the up and down in bullpens. The Sox largly avoided that with Whitlock and Houck, all credit to the plan but it spoke for their success also. To extend them out to more innings they could schedule them to pitch, even start, three or four innings. Thee every fourth game, adding in scheduled days off, is 8 plus appearances a month, 25 innings, 48 appearances 150 controlled innings for the season, providing regularity plus only one time plus through the lineup. Four innings every fifth game gives similar innings. The three top starters are unlikely to get well beyond 150 innings, and the next lesser three will go well below that, so 300 innings from the two would take pressure off the bullpen by itself and give Houck and Whitlock opportunity to develop.

Kevbot034
4 years ago

That Casas and Dalbec are projected roughly the same season doesn’t sound great. I think Casas could be notably better than this if he gets 450 at bats though. I’m actually a little surprised ZiPS doesn’t like him more for this year.

MikeD
4 years ago

I was fairly positive on the Red Sox heading into last year, even though the consensus among fans and media was they’d struggle to play .500 and finish above 4th. I had them targeted for third, a winning record and challenging for a playoff spot, but falling short. They exceeded even my expectations.

My concern this year is health. I don’t see their starters taking the mound as consistently. It’s an underrated aspect of team evaluation by many. Health is a skill and the 2021 Red Sox had it. Yes, I know they were hit by a Covid outbreak, but so was the team they tied with, the Yankees, who seemingly were dealing with outbreak cases all season. Let’s hope 2022 brings us a season that is mostly Covid free. I like Whitlock, but I’m not expecting a repeat. A good but not great Whitlock weakens them slightly. Their pen should still be good, but probably a tick worse. They will miss E-Rod. None of this sounds like a big issue, unless you realize they tied with a team that greatly underperformed at the plate. Will that happen again?

Overall, I’m with Dan’s projection. A mid-80s win team, but that probably doesn’t get them out of 4th. To state the obvious, they’ll need to make a few moves post lockout. I suspect they will, but so will the Yankees, and the Blue Jays are a rising force.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  MikeD

If the Blue Jays wind up with another reliever to complement Romano / Mayza then I think they’re the obvious favorites in the AL East. With Manoah establishing himself and Gausman and Berrios on board the rotation is no longer as dependent on Ryu’s health. They could also get another infield bat to bump Espinal back into a utility role although I’m not sure they’d be in the market for Bryant or Story unless their market collapses.

MikeD
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’m waiting to do my own evaluation on the Jays, figuring they still have a couple moves in them. My biggest question revolves around the losses of Semien and Ray, who contributed 14 rWAR. Will a full season of Berrios and Manoah , along with Gausman compensate? I’ve got to believe they’ll have more luck with their bullpen.

The division will be brutal. Two of the better teams in MLB may not even make the postseason, although we’ll probably have expanded postseason teams with the next CBA.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  MikeD

By BaseRuns the Jays got pretty unlucky last year and the Red Sox and Yankees overperformed. That could be bullpen-related but with McHugh, Tepera, and Chafin still available there are actually some solid options still left. Losing Semien definitely hurts, but they’ll probably have Springer for another couple hundred PAs. They could use another left handed bat and another infielder but I’d be surprised if they were going to hand out another $100M+ contract. Maybe they take a guy with a big contract off someone’s hands.

tstats123
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I thought the Jays should’ve been all over Escobar but alas…

Dmjn53
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’ve given up betting against the Rays. They had no meaningful losses and are gaining a full season of Franco. They’re the favorites until proven otherwise

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

I would think that the Rays are the other main contender. The reason I don’t think they will be the favorites is that I think the Blue Jays are ridiculously talented, they probably not done adding, and the Rays are probably going to subtract. I expect that Kiermaier is gone after the lockout, and probably one or both of Margot / Meadows. But they should be able to contend for the division with an outfield of Arozarena, Lowe, Phillips, and whoever they get to platoon with Phillips (which may be Margot, but could be Brujan), plus they’ll potentially get Glasnow back.

CC AFCMember since 2016
4 years ago

I’d like to point out that this is a really weird looking baseball team that is somehow a perfect encapsulation of New England. Physically speaking. Devers and Dalbec look like 15 year olds, their ace is Lefty Slender Man, they’re playing Rittz in right field and Christian Vazquez has more freckles than 3 counties of Ireland. #notgraphs

Sooted72
4 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

lol cant upvote this enough.

Kevbot034
4 years ago

My biggest shock of this article though, was that Ryan Sweeney put up a nearly 4 WAR season while hitting only 6 HR and swiping 6 bags. Betting Alex Verdugo wouldn’t be thrilled at that season, but it’d be by far his best

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Kevbot034

Sweeney got rave reviews for defense that year. Verdugo can’t count on that. Sweeney never came close again

Matt
4 years ago

There are a few issued in Dan’s/ZIPs assessment:
– The Red Sox still view Whitlock as a starter long term. He was forced to be a reliever due to rule 5 draft rules and the inability to stretch him out. He may remain a reliever this year due to the 7 other starters, but he should be viewed as starter depth and remove the need for additional depth.
– The bullpen’s lack of back-end talent is greatly undersold in the article. It’s a definite need and Chaim Bloom has admitted as much. While possible the Red Sox convert a starter to fill this need, expect them to pickup another high-ish-end reliever this off-season.
– Although he mentioned it, Dan didn’t elaborate on how night-and-day the high minors pitching depth was from last year to this year. There are loads of arms now with the upside to step in and contribute, but they all have question marks.
– Verdugo was in LF last year and the general assumption is that he continues there this year. But that requires another signing capable of playing/starting in RF. This seems to be Red Sox plan A, with a move of Verdugo to RF as a secondary plan.
– To elaborate on the additional bench needs. The Red Sox should be expected to sign a LH 1st baseman as they don’t have one available until Casas is promoted. There’s also a strong chance of a middle-infielder being signed (likely after injured 40-man guys go on the 60-day IL) as Arrauz may not be ready for that role.

I do have two questions regarding negative ZIPs rankings.
– Houck has greatly, and consistently, outperformed his ZIPs projections. Is the regression an over reliance on his pre-2020 numbers? That seems rather short sighted imo. That being said, Houck can’t go 3 times through a lineup at this point.
– Casas was at his best in the Arizona fall league and the Olympics. These were smaller samples, but were against high-ish levels of competition and the two breaks from the Olympics caused slumps in the minors. Does ZIPs account for the Olympics and AFL?

Matt
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

Thanks for the response Dan – appreciate the added insights.

Do you find that this year is more frustrating than usual due to the delay in signings? I don’t have the data to support this, but I assume there are more position openings and unsigned free agents (who will be signed) than usual at this time.

The main gripe I have regarding the ZIPs Houck expectations is the low K rate. He has 3 small samples (2 MLB; 1 AAA) over the last two years and they have each shown a k/9 above 11. Does ZIPs add weight to multiple small samples, or does it view the innings equally whether it be one sample or multiple?

Agreed on Casas – there’s no definitive reason to believe the slumps should have a lesser weight, but as a fan, it gives reason for optimism!

One last question – what level of weight does ZIPs give an AFL PA as opposed to a AAA PA in the same season? (Apologies if that’s getting too deep in the methodology)

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago

It seems like more people comp to Pettitte and Mike Epstein than I thought

grandbranyanMember since 2017
4 years ago

Love that David Hamilton projection. 67 OPS+ but 33 SB/5 CS with +7 defense is giving me eighties shortstop flashbacks.

Just curious how the defensive component is arrived at for minor league guys? Hamilton’s +7 projection is just below Andrelton (+9), even with Ahmed (+7) and higher than Story (+4) who are all established DRS darlings.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago

Seeing the name John-Ford Griffin makes me want to see a player named Martin-Scorsese Hernandez. Also Chris Hermann’s son should be an NFL quarterback.

tstats123
4 years ago

The Rich Hill-Wakefield comp is golden

Sooted72
4 years ago
Reply to  tstats123

lol almost as perfect as the jdm-jim rice comps.

last year in the comments i said something like ‘the red sox have the highest variance of all the teams. they could 2013 this season or 2020 this season or anywhere in between and i wouldn’t be surprised.’ lol so, yeah, im gonna run that back for this year too. i know: deep, analytical stuff.

Matthew TobinMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  tstats123

To be fair: Wakefield was the best pitcher in MVP 2005.

David Klein
4 years ago
Reply to  Matthew Tobin

Also in the original rbi baseball just kidding he wasn’t around that long ago.

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago

I say this because I’m selfish, but, Dan, is there any way you can release Zips better coordinated with the top prospects release. That way we can look at holes in teams and then see who, if anyone, on the farm could potentially fill them. Without waiting. I know this would be tough logistically. Like I said I’m selfish!

VinnieDaGooch
4 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

Zips projects prospects though? Any prospect that can reasonably be expected to fill a hole on a team will show up in the Zips projections.

Uncle SpikeMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

Not quite sure what you are actually asking for here. As Vinnie said, any prospects on the Sox farm that are likely to contribute to the major league team in any capacity are already listed in the projections (Casas, Krawford, Seabold, Duran). If you’re asking for it to be coordinated with Eric’s Top Prospect reports, I don’t think you want that as Dan is far ahead of Eric’s schedule and those don’t typically wrap up till mid summer.

drewsylvaniaMember since 2019
4 years ago

I don’t get the hate for Duran (unless he’s still recovering from covid?). I don’t get the love for Darwinzon, either. 4.80 FIP and he still has no idea where his pitches are going.

Matthew TobinMember since 2016
4 years ago

The Dutch Leonard comp for Sale is bizarre.

Here is the pitcher with one of the highest K% of all time….let’s comp him to a pitcher from 1930

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
4 years ago

Bosoxforlife checking in after watching nearly every inning of 173 games in 2021. I recall asking Ben Clemens last spring if I was hallucinating when I thought the Red Sox were much better than than the projections and he agreed. As I look back there is not much that surprised me. Only fools couldn’t see that Devers and Bogaerts were going to mash, 2020 was no reason to give up on J.D.Martinez, Verdugo is just fine, Vasquez is better than most catchers and the role players, especially Arroyo and Plawecki, did enough. The surprises were Hernandez, 4.9 bWAR doesn’t even begin to tell the story, and Whitlock, 3.0 bWAR in just 46 appearances was simply consistently excellent, and were the reason the Sox made the playoffs. In today’s game pitching has become a different animal than anything I have seen before. Starters no longer dominate staffs and while Eovaldi, Rodriquez and Pivetta were all solid, and losing ERod is going to hurt, nowhere near enough credit is given to the bullpen. Whitlock has already been mentioned but throw out two early appearances and Josh Taylor was superb, Ottavino never made me nervous, Sawamura did!, but Brasier and Robles were money down the stretch. The forgotten man for 2022 is Barnes. He was terrific until he was used 3 times in 2 days in early August then collapsed. His return to becoming a valuable member of the bullpen is more likely than not. Renfroe will be missed. It was said he only hit poor pitching but since that encompasses about 80% of what passes for pitching nowadays it doesn’t mean much, and ohhh that arm. It won a few games outright and please don’t try and tell me that defensive metrics can tell me how many runners he prevented from advancing. What does 2022 look like at this moment? From this fans viewpoint the team is a little weaker now than last year. The offense still looks good. The core is there and Casas is screaming “I can play” to anyone with one eye. The loss of Rodriquez, his FIP is a truer measure of 2021 than his ERA, and Renfroe hurts as they were key pieces. Sale has not convinced anybody that he is still a stud. Wacha, Hill and Paxton look a lot like Richards and Perez. The key is whether the team can maximize what Houck has to offer. He 2.51 FIP says a lot and he has absolutely never been hit hard consistently while racking up huge strikeout totals and eliciting some of the worst looking swings by many players such as Ronald Acuna, Jr. Is he just a 5 inning pitcher, maybe, but in today’s game even aces, see Blake Snell, are often only 5 inning pitchers. From the first game I saw at Fenway in 1948 through 2022 will be 75 years of cheers and tears and I can’t wait for the season to start.

Ben HallMember since 2016
4 years ago

This is not a criticism, just a note. ZiPS has Bogaerts projected for 3.6 wins. Steamer has him projected for 4.3. Since 2015, Bogaerts has been worth less than 4.6 wins in a full season once, back in 2017. If you pro-rate 2020 he would have been worth over 5. I am generally a strong believer in good projection systems, but I’d take the over.

LesVegetables
4 years ago
Reply to  Ben Hall

For whatever reason, while his projections are never bad, ZiPS seems to undershoot the WAR forecast on Bogaerts pretty consistently. My guess is it has something to do with the positional adjustment or defense in general. There might be a difference there between how Fangraphs calculates WAR and how Dan does. Here are Xander’s ZiPS projected WAR vs. actual WAR for the last 3 full seasons:

2021: Projected: 4.1 Actual 5.2
2019: Projected: 3.8 Actual: 6.8
2018: Projected: 3.2 Actual: 4.9

Seems like something is up.

tung_twista
4 years ago
Reply to  LesVegetables

Nothing is up except Bogaerts was consistently better than ZiPS thought he would be.
In 2018, ZiPS projected wrc+ 105 and Bogaerts got wrc+ 133.
In 2019, ZiPS projected OPS+ 114 and Bogaerts got wrc+ 141.
In 2020, ZiPS projected OPS+ 123 and Bogaerts got wrc+ 130.
In 2021, ZiPS projected OPS+ 125 and Bogaerts got wrc+ 130.

LesVegetables
4 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

First of all, OPS+ and wRC+ are not the same thing, so you are exaggerating the difference here. In 2021 for example his OPS+ was 127 – not materially different from the 125 he was projected to have. ZiPS has actually done a fine job forecasting Bogaerts offense throughout his career. Even this year’s forecast, a .287/.360/.502 line with 26 home runs, is a perfectly fine forecast and about what you should expect.

It’s just the WAR total where something is off, and I think it has something to do with how defense is incorporated. The difference in offensive performance is not nearly enough to justify how Xander has put up nearly 6 more WAR over the 3 season I posted than ZiPS forecasted.

darren
4 years ago

A real conundrum with the left side of the infield. Your two best players are entrenched at positions that they’re not good at. One seemingly easy way to improve the team would be to shift both off of those positions, but doing so could create other problems. Plus, both are very good players who the fans would like to lock up, but those projections say that long term deals would probably be a bad idea.