2025 End-of-Season Top 100 Prospects Update

Greg Wohlford/ERIE TIMES-NEWS-USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Image

Today’s postseason off day provides a nice opportunity to push an update to my Top 100 Prospects list. This is a “low-hanging fruit” update, more of a polishing and augmentation of the current list than an omnibus analysis of the entirety of the minor leagues. I mainly focused on the players who are closest to graduation, players who got a cup of coffee in the big leagues (sometimes a big cup, close to the maximum roster days without losing 2026 rookie eligibility) and who we basically can’t know any more about than we currently do before they graduate next year. I took a pass at the guys who were already on the Top 100 in a variety of ways; the cement is dry on their season-long stats and their underlying performance data, so everyone got a checkup in this regard, as well as via a TrackMan data check-in. I also watched all of these players swing and play defense at least a little bit just to re-establish an end-of-season visual understanding of their look.

Immediately below, you’ll see the updated list along with trend arrows indicating if a player’s FV grade has changed on this update, and then below that my thoughts on the clusters of players that formed throughout this process. The number of players on whom I have a grade of 50 or better is currently a little below 100, and the number of healthy players is even lower than that. As the offseason list-making process gets underway, there will probably be more players added to this tier, and any player’s grade is potentially subject to change as the down time allows for deeper analysis.

2025 End-of-Season Top Prospects
Rank Name Position Age Team FV Trend
1 Konnor Griffin SS 19.4 PIT 65 ↑↑
2 Jesús Made SS 18.4 MIL 65 ↑↑
3 Kevin McGonigle 2B 21.1 DET 60
4 Samuel Basallo C 21.1 BAL 60
5 Bubba Chandler SP 23.1 PIT 60
6 Sebastian Walcott SS 19.6 TEX 60
7 Max Clark CF 20.8 DET 60
8 Colt Emerson SS 20.2 SEA 55 ↑↑
9 JJ Wetherholt 2B 23.1 STL 55
10 Leo De Vries SS 19.0 ATH 55 ↑↑
11 Aidan Miller SS 21.3 PHI 55
12 Nolan McLean SP 24.2 NYM 55 ↑↑
13 Andrew Painter SP 22.5 PHI 55 ↓↓
14 Carson Williams SS 22.3 TBR 55
15 George Lombard Jr. SS 20.3 NYY 55
16 Bryce Eldridge 1B 21.0 SFG 55
17 Josue De Paula RF 20.4 LAD 55
18 Thomas White SP 21.0 MIA 55 ↑↑
19 Liam Doyle SP 21.3 STL 55
20 Alfredo Duno C 19.7 CIN 55
21 Ethan Holliday 3B 18.6 COL 55
22 Noah Schultz SP 22.2 CHW 55
23 Jarlin Susana SP 21.5 WSN 55
24 Angel Genao SS 21.4 CLE 50
25 Franklin Arias SS 19.9 BOS 50
26 Travis Bazzana 2B 23.1 CLE 50
27 Eli Willits SS 17.8 WSN 50
28 Josuar De Jesus Gonzalez SS 18.0 SFG 50
29 Luis Peña SS 18.9 MIL 50
30 Walker Jenkins LF 20.6 MIN 50
31 Josue Briceño C 21.0 DET 50
32 Parker Messick SP 24.9 CLE 50
33 Jonah Tong SP 22.3 NYM 50
34 Kade Anderson SP 21.2 SEA 50
35 Trey Yesavage SP 22.2 TOR 50
36 Luis Morales SP 23.0 ATH 50
37 Arjun Nimmala SS 20.0 TOR 50
38 Aiva Arquette SS 22.0 MIA 50
39 Joe Mack C 22.8 MIA 50
40 Leonardo Bernal C 21.6 STL 50 ↑↑
41 Thayron Liranzo C 22.2 DET 50
42 Carter Jensen C 22.3 KCR 50
43 Harry Ford C 22.6 SEA 50
44 Kevin Alcántara CF 23.2 CHC 50
45 Zyhir Hope RF 20.7 LAD 50
46 Braden Montgomery RF 22.5 CHW 50
47 Emmanuel Rodriguez CF 22.6 MIN 50
48 Chase DeLauter RF 24.0 CLE 50
49 Ethan Salas C 19.3 SDP 50 ↓↓
50 Robby Snelling SP 21.8 MIA 50 ↑↑
51 Brandon Sproat SP 25.0 NYM 50
52 Chase Petty SP 22.5 CIN 50
53 Trey Gibson SP 23.4 BAL 50
54 Alex Freeland SS 24.1 LAD 50
55 Jefferson Rojas SS 20.4 CHC 50
56 Cooper Pratt SS 21.1 MIL 50
57 Gage Jump SP 22.5 ATH 50
58 Payton Tolle SP 22.9 BOS 50
59 Carson Benge CF 22.7 NYM 50
60 Ryan Waldschmidt LF 23.0 ARI 50 ↑↑
61 Cooper Ingle C 23.6 CLE 50
62 Michael Arroyo 2B 20.9 SEA 50
63 Jacob Reimer 3B 21.6 NYM 50
64 Brody Hopkins SP 23.7 TBR 50
65 Jurrangelo Cijntje SP 22.3 SEA 50
66 Jaxon Wiggins SP 24.0 CHC 50
67 Kyson Witherspoon SP 21.1 BOS 50
68 Tyler Bremner SP 21.5 LAA 50
69 Jett Williams CF 21.9 NYM 50
70 Jonny Farmelo CF 21.1 SEA 50
71 Rainiel Rodriguez C 18.7 STL 50
72 Eduardo Quintero CF 20.0 LAD 50 ↑↑
73 Khal Stephen SP 22.8 CLE 50
74 Edward Florentino 1B 18.9 PIT 50 ↑↑
75 Felnin Celesten SS 20.1 SEA 50
76 Kayson Cunningham 2B 19.3 ARI 50
77 Jimmy Crooks C 24.2 STL 50
78 Tre’ Morgan 1B 23.2 TBR 50
79 Rhett Lowder SP 23.6 CIN 50
80 Jackson Ferris SP 21.7 LAD 50
81 Hagen Smith SP 22.1 CHW 50
82 George Klassen SP 23.7 LAA 50
83 Quinn Mathews SP 25.0 STL 50
84 Carson Whisenhunt SP 25.0 SFG 50
85 Connor Prielipp SP 24.7 MIN 50
86 Brandon Clarke SP 22.5 BOS 50
87 Tink Hence SP 23.2 STL 50
88 River Ryan SP 27.1 LAD 50
89 Jeferson Quero C 23.0 MIL 50
90 Logan Henderson SP 23.6 MIL 50
91 Didier Fuentes SP 20.3 ATL 50
92 Ricky Tiedemann SP 23.1 TOR 50
93 Jake Bloss SP 24.3 TOR 50
94 Travis Sykora SP 21.4 WSN 50
95 Moisés Chace SP 22.3 PHI 50

65 FV Prospects
Rank Name Position Age Team
1 Konnor Griffin SS 19.4 PIT
2 Jesús Made SS 18.4 MIL

Griffin and Made have separated themselves from the rest of the group, in my opinion. Griffin reached Double-A and posted a roughly average contact rate on the big league scale after his amateur performance in that area was concerning. He’s built like an NFL tight end prospect, has enormous strength in his hands and wrists, does huge damage on contact already at age 19, and projects to have even more power at his physical peak. Physically, he should settle in the Corey Seager/Carlos Correa area. In the short term, his plus-plus speed will also help his hit tool play closer to average despite what I expect will be a below-average contact rate in the big leagues due to his issues swinging inside sliders. What Griffin lacks in soft and deft hands on defense he makes up for with spectacular athleticism and effort.

The offensive skill set of Made, a switch-hitter who is a year younger than Griffin, is driven by incredible, full-body bat speed and preternatural feel for contact. He’s a better pure contact hitter than Griffin, but his power isn’t nearly as actualized yet, both due to Made’s immature physicality (relative to Griffin, anyway) and the flatter nature of his fledgling swings. Made has roughly average power right now, which is incredible for an 18-year-old, and it wouldn’t surprise me if an offseason in the weight room closes some of the gap between him and Griffin in this regard. Made also has a higher ceiling as a defender, which you can learn more about here. It’s possible that I’ll flip their order when I publish the 2026 Top 100 in February, or that someone from further down my current list will join these two upon a deeper offseason review, but for now these two are in a tier on their own. Look at the shortstop WAR Leaderboard from this season. Even a down year from Gunnar Henderson produced nearly 5 WAR. That’s the range I expect this duo will produce in with regularity.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
60 FV Prospects
Rank Name Position Age Team
3 Kevin McGonigle 2B 21.1 DET
4 Samuel Basallo C 21.1 BAL
5 Bubba Chandler SP 23.1 PIT
6 Sebastian Walcott SS 19.6 TEX
7 Max Clark CF 20.8 DET

I didn’t make changes to the 60 FV tier beyond moving Made and Griffin up and moving Painter down. Things keeping this group from being in the tier above are nitpicky, but that’s the reality when we’re splitting hairs up this high. McGonigle is arguably the most stable all-around prospect in baseball due to his proximity to the bigs and his exceptional feel for contact. Twelve months from now we might feel about him the way we did Jackson Merrill at the end of 2024. He doesn’t have the monstrous long-term physical projection of these other guys; he has more of a stocky build and probably isn’t a shortstop. He could provide Detroit with a seamless transition away from Gleyber Torres next year. Samuel Basallo is the polar opposite, a power-hitting leviathan with a risky lack of plate discipline, which becomes scarier if he fails to improve as a defender and needs to move permanently to first base. He has absurd power for a catcher and a great arm when he’s healthy.

Chandler wrapped up his third consecutive season of 100-plus innings with his first big league cup of coffee. He sustained a velo spike throughout the entire season, averaging 98 mph while setting a personal best for single-season innings total. His secondary stuff is still inconsistent. To that end, his forecast is very positive; it’s common for pitchers with this kind of arm speed to develop better control later than their soft-tossing peers, and Chander is the sort of athlete (both in size and mobility) whom we should feel comfortable projecting on in this regard. The arc of his next several years could look like the first few years of Hunter Greene’s big league tenure.

Max Clark (a compact athlete with freaky contact feel, plus speed and center field defense) and Sebastian Walcott (plus-plus power projection and a shot to stay at shortstop) have a chance to move further up the list if they find a way to get to more power in games. Walcott’s shrugable slash line (.255/.355/.386) was still good for a 111 wRC+, great for a teenager in Double-A ball. Clark had more walks than strikeouts and didn’t skip a beat when he was promoted to Double-A Erie. He has a sensational leadoff hitter’s profile.

55 FV Prospects
Rank Name Position Age Team FV Trend
8 Colt Emerson SS 20.2 SEA 55 ↑↑
9 JJ Wetherholt 2B 23.1 STL 55
10 Leo De Vries SS 19.0 ATH 55 ↑↑
11 Aidan Miller SS 21.3 PHI 55
12 Nolan McLean SP 24.2 NYM 55 ↑↑
13 Andrew Painter SP 22.5 PHI 55 ↓↓
14 Carson Williams SS 22.3 TBR 55
15 George Lombard Jr. SS 20.3 NYY 55
16 Bryce Eldridge 1B 21.0 SFG 55
17 Josue De Paula RF 20.4 LAD 55
18 Thomas White SP 21.0 MIA 55 ↑↑;
19 Liam Doyle SP 21.3 STL 55
20 Alfredo Duno C 19.7 CIN 55
21 Ethan Holliday 3B 18.6 COL 55
22 Noah Schultz SP 22.2 CHW 55
23 Jarlin Susana SP 21.5 WSN 55

A few of the middle infielders who sat at the very top of the 50 FV tier throughout the 2025 season have crept into the 55 FV tier on this update based on continued performance and improved proximity to the bigs. Several players in this group – Colt Emerson, JJ Wetherholt, Leo De Vries, and Aidan Miller – all have issues on defense that might prevent them from remaining at shortstop. Emerson, Wetherholt, and De Vries have arm strength and accuracy issues, while Miller’s hands were sketchy and error-prone late in the year. This entire group projects to hit enough to be good players even if they’re flawed defenders or need to move to another position altogether, but again, it’s little things like these that create daylight between them and the 60 FV players.

Nolan McLean’s 2025 per pitch performance data is somewhat pedestrian in terms of chase and miss. Aside from what Synergy Sports has classified as his curveball, none of his pitches has generated plus miss on the season. But let’s not kid ourselves here: McLean’s breaking stuff is obviously plus or better, and he commands a distinct pair of fastballs to the locations in which they’re each most effective, with the sinker variant looking especially nasty. This is a pitcher who can play “X Games” with his fastballs and many nuanced breaking balls, with pitches finishing in every quadrant of the zone. McLean’s changeup has funky sinking action and is an effective surprise right now, and it has exciting long-term projection because of his athleticism, mechanical consistency, and relatively fresh focus on pitching. He ends the year as the second-best pitching prospect in baseball.

Painter’s season was disappointing in light of the perhaps overzealous expectations laid out for him by people like me, who posited he might kick down the door and play a meaningful role for a contending team. Instead, he posted an ERA over five and missed fewer bats with his fastball than I would have guessed if you’d have told me Painter would be sitting 96 all year. But in a vacuum his season has been fine. He’s a 22-year-old who hadn’t thrown a pitch at an affiliate since 2022, and yet was aggressively pushed to Triple-A. When you look at the 2025 season as a whole, Painter’s stuff has performed like it’s made of average-or-below components across the board, but for the last six weeks of the season he upped his changeup usage a ton. Both it, and his slider, played more like plus offerings in terms of miss and chase during that window. If there’s a real issue looming here it’s Painter’s lack of fastball miss. This is a 6-foot-7 guy who’s only generating a little over six feet of extension; he’s not getting way over his front side on release and his heater has the downhill plane associated with “round down” fastballs. This is different than before, as Painter’s delivery is different now than it was during his dominant, meteoric rise prior to injury.

Painter’s newer delivery features a good bit less tilt in his torso and a slightly lower arm angle. The current release point looks easier for him to execute and repeat than the one in 2022, and this newer slot probably helps him move the ball laterally more than his old one, but these changes have also sucked some of the pure vertical life out of his pre-surgery fastball. Here we have visual evidence that reinforces what the data suggest; something here has changed and negatively impacted the bat-missing ability of Painter’s fastball compared to when he was last pitching for an entire season.

He still has a very favorable overall forecast as a mid-rotation workhorse with good secondary stuff and command, but it’s tough to project him as a contender’s no. 1 or no. 2 starter if he doesn’t have an impact fastball, and so he slides down an FV tier on this end-of-season update.

Everyday Middle Infielders
Rank Name Position Age Team FV Trend
24 Angel Genao SS 21.4 CLE 50
25 Franklin Arias SS 19.9 BOS 50
26 Travis Bazzana 2B 23.1 CLE 50
27 Eli Willits SS 17.8 WSN 50
28 Josuar De Jesus Gonzalez SS 18.0 SFG 50
29 Luis Peña SS 18.9 MIL 50

Bazzana is the most polished of this group by a lot, but also the least projectable. I’ve seen enough of Josuar Gonzalez in Arizona to consider him in lockstep with Willits, who just went first in the draft. Gonzalez is an incredible athlete with amazing athleticism and range on defense. He’s built like a young Francisco Lindor. Players in this group are the favorites to move into the upper-level FV tiers during the next 12 months.

Bat-First Regulars
Rank Name Position Age Team FV Trend
30 Walker Jenkins LF 20.6 MIN 50
31 Josue Briceño C 21.0 DET 50
59 Carson Benge CF 22.7 NYM 50
60 Ryan Waldschmidt LF 23.0 ARI 50 ↑↑
62 Michael Arroyo 2B 20.9 SEA 50
63 Jacob Reimer 3B 21.6 NYM 50

Jenkins is a great contact hitter with OK power, but not the kind of juice a corner outfielder needs to be a superstar. Briceño isn’t throwing well and is trending toward first base. Waldschmidt is a well-rounded hitter who is average or better in basically every facet of offense, especially his plate discipline, and he joins this cluster from outside.

Virtual Lock Mid-Rotation Types
Rank Name Position Age Team FV Trend
32 Parker Messick SP 24.9 CLE 50
33 Jonah Tong SP 22.3 NYM 50
34 Kade Anderson SP 21.2 SEA 50
35 Trey Yesavage SP 22.2 TOR 50
36 Luis Morales SP 23.0 ATH 50

This is a fairly self-explanatory group. I expect Anderson will move quickly enough through the minors to perhaps debut in 2026 and nearly keep pace with the other four guys, who have already debuted. The deliveries of Yesavage and Tong are quirky enough to have kept them out of the 55 FV tier. Morales has the most significant relief risk of this group, but he also might have the highest ceiling.

Primary Catchers
Rank Name Position Age Team FV Trend
39 Joe Mack C 22.8 MIA 50
40 Leonardo Bernal C 21.6 STL 50 ↑↑
41 Thayron Liranzo C 22.2 DET 50
42 Carter Jensen C 22.3 KCR 50
43 Harry Ford C 22.6 SEA 50
61 Cooper Ingle C 23.6 CLE 50

The way this group is ordered might change during the offseason. If you’re a fantasy player looking for the best pure hitters of the bunch, Ingle and Bernal are your guys. Liranzo and Jensen have big power but are going to strike out a ton. Joe Mack, too. He’s currently at the front of the group for me because he’s doing some absurd things throwing the baseball, stuff I’ve never seen before.

Power Hitters With Strikeout Risk
Rank Name Position Age Team FV Trend
37 Arjun Nimmala SS 20.0 TOR 50
38 Aiva Arquette SS 22.0 MIA 50
44 Kevin Alcántara CF 23.2 CHC 50
45 Zyhir Hope RF 20.7 LAD 50
46 Braden Montgomery RF 22.5 CHW 50

Nimmala and Arquette are freaky big shortstops with power. Their defensive fits give their hit tools more room to breath, while the rest of this group is likely to occupy a corner outfield spot.

Oft-Injured
Rank Name Position Age Team FV Trend
47 Emmanuel Rodriguez CF 22.6 MIN 50
48 Chase DeLauter RF 24.0 CLE 50
49 Ethan Salas C 19.3 SDP 50 ↓↓

Salas hasn’t played during Padres instructs, which makes me think he won’t actually play in the Arizona Fall League, even though he was announced as being part of Peoria’s roster. It’s common for Fall Leaguers to tune up during instructional league play, and the Padres guys have done so, except Salas. It’s possible he could end up playing later in the AFL schedule, or skip AFL entirely and play winter ball in Venezuela or Puerto Rico. Persistent injury causes him to slide here.

Low-Variance No. 4 Starters
Rank Name Position Age Team FV Trend
50 Robby Snelling SP 21.8 MIA 50 ↑↑
51 Brandon Sproat SP 25.0 NYM 50
52 Chase Petty SP 22.5 CIN 50
53 Trey Gibson SP 23.4 BAL 50
73 Khal Stephen SP 22.8 CLE 50
79 Rhett Lowder SP 23.6 CIN 50
80 Jackson Ferris SP 21.7 LAD 50

I’ve tended to be lower on Snelling and had him pegged as more of a backend starter than a mid-rotation type for basically his entire pro career. Since acquiring him from San Diego, the Marlins have changed Snelling’s placement on the rubber (he’s shifted from the middle to the first base side), and he’s had a nearly three-tick velocity spike across his entire repertoire.

Low-Variance Everyday Shortstops
Rank Name Position Age Team FV Trend
54 Alex Freeland SS 24.1 LAD 50
55 Jefferson Rojas SS 20.4 CHC 50
56 Cooper Pratt SS 21.1 MIL 50

There has to be a gap between this contingent and the more explosive group at the very top of the 50 FV tier because of the latter’s upside, but the players here are tracking like 2-WAR everyday infielders in their own right.

Monster Fastballs
Rank Name Position Age Team FV Trend
57 Gage Jump SP 22.5 ATH 50
58 Payton Tolle SP 22.9 BOS 50
64 Brody Hopkins SP 23.7 TBR 50

Jump’s slider improved this year while Tolle’s secondary stuff is still pretty generic.

Higher Variance Mid-Rotation Guys
Rank Name Position Age Team FV Trend
65 Jurrangelo Cijntje SP 22.3 SEA 50
66 Jaxon Wiggins SP 24.0 CHC 50
67 Kyson Witherspoon SP 21.1 BOS 50
68 Tyler Bremner SP 21.5 LAA 50

This group is a tad further away from the big leagues than the high-floored, major league-ready no. 4 starters on this list, but this cluster also has a little more ceiling than the Parker Messick types.

Magmatic Hitters
Rank Name Position Age Team FV Trend
69 Jett Williams CF 21.9 NYM 50
70 Jonny Farmelo CF 21.1 SEA 50
71 Rainiel Rodriguez C 18.7 STL 50
72 Eduardo Quintero CF 20.0 LAD 50 ↑↑
74 Edward Florentino 1B 18.9 PIT 50 ↑↑
75 Felnin Celesten SS 20.1 SEA 50
76 Kayson Cunningham 2B 19.3 ARI 50

Lots of variance here. Eduardo Quintero moves in largely because he was better incorporating his top hand into his swing late in the season, helping him cover the inner third with pull power. Florentino, a projectable lefty corner bat with great barrel feel, might soon be the next Walker Jenkins, a corner bat with a 60-grade hit tool and 50-grade power.

Elite Defenders
Rank Name Position Age Team FV Trend
77 Jimmy Crooks C 24.2 STL 50
78 Tre’ Morgan 1B 23.2 TBR 50

Both of these guys have below-average offensive skill sets, but they’re elite defenders at positions that touch the baseball constantly.

Relief Risk
Rank Name Position Age Team FV Trend
81 Hagen Smith SP 22.1 CHW 50
82 George Klassen SP 23.7 LAA 50
83 Quinn Mathews SP 25.0 STL 50
84 Carson Whisenhunt SP 25.0 SFG 50
85 Connor Prielipp SP 24.7 MIN 50
86 Brandon Clarke SP 22.5 BOS 50
87 Tink Hence SP 23.2 STL 50

Injured
Rank Name Position Age Team FV Trend
88 River Ryan SP 27.1 LAD 50
89 Jeferson Quero C 23.0 MIL 50
90 Logan Henderson SP 23.6 MIL 50
91 Didier Fuentes SP 20.3 ATL 50
92 Ricky Tiedemann SP 23.1 TOR 50
93 Jake Bloss SP 24.3 TOR 50
94 Travis Sykora SP 21.4 WSN 50
95 Moisés Chace SP 22.3 PHI 50





Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.

91 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
cashgod27Member since 2024
9 months ago

I get it was a small sample, but Jesus was Carson Williams’ time in the bigs terrifying.

Also, I thought Lombard was only a 50 on the last update

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  cashgod27

Carson Williams’ offensive performance is a counterpoint to everyone who says “it doesn’t matter how much you strike out in the minors if you hit for enough power.” Sorry, it absolutely matters if you are running a 64% contact rate in AAA. The Willy Adames comp was always very optimistic, he was always more of a Gabriel Arias type of player. And right now he doesn’t look like a major leaguer of any kind.

MoMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I suppose the counterpoint to your counterpoint would be Colson Montgomery. I don’t know what adjustment he made, but his athleticism finally won out. Perhaps Williams’s will too.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  Mo

Colson Montgomery was a very risky prospect and is now a risky major league player but his contact rate was 10 points higher than Williams’ pretty much at every level.

Right now Montgomery is running about a 70% contact rate, which is pretty close to the floor for being a functional hitter unless you have Judge / Ohtani / Wood level power. Williams’ contact rate in AAA was lower than any MLB player with more than 400 PAs…except Gabriel Arias.

Last edited 9 months ago by sadtrombone
A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Right, and I would add that it’s too soon to know if Montgomery will be able to maintain this level of production. If we want to go with another White Sox example, Jake Burger had similar contact/power numbers, and he’s only had one cromulent offensive season.

CromulentMember since 2017
9 months ago

Nice

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago

It looks like he’s going to stick at shortstop, and that means he’ll get a lot of time to work through any issues.

He’s more in the 60-grade raw category than 70-grade so it does put some pressure to make a bit more contact. He was on a pace to hit something like 45 homers this year and that would play at any position but it’s something you cannot count on continuing.

But since he’s a good shortstop he mostly just has to not get worse at contact to continue to get everyday reps and work through things. I’m sure the White Sox would breathe easier if he had a bit more margin for error on either the raw power or contact side.

Jorge FabregasMember since 2016
9 months ago

Burger as an average shortstop would be a good player. 4 out of 5 of his seasons have had an above 100 wRC+. Burger would be a better hitter with a league average walk rate, which Montgomery did eventually end up with this season.

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  Jorge Fabregas

Burger’s 1st 2 seasons were 42 and 183 PAs, so he’s only really had 3 full(ish) seasons. But yes, Montgomery with those numbers over full seasons with average defense would still be a good SS, but not the Seager comp that some White Sox fans have been throwing out forever.

Jorge FabregasMember since 2016
9 months ago

I think the Seager comparison was largely tall shortstop who isn’t supposed to stick at the position. And it does seem like he may have staying power there. The idea of him as a well-rounded hitter like Seager has kind of sailed over the last two years.

dodgerbleu
9 months ago

Jake Burger has only had one non-cromulent season, this year, when he played through a wrist injury that he’s already had surgery on. Even still he had a 81 wRC+ in the 1st half, and a 114 in the 2nd half, he has a 108 wRC+ for his career, literally the only thing he’s good for is providing cromulent offensive seasons.

This is a terrible, terrible comp. Adames has a career 109 wRC+. Semien does too. Story has a 106. Dansby Swanson has a 96. Brandon Crawford had a 94.

No offense, but you don’t know what you’re talking about. Not cromulent at all, dude..

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  Mo

Related to this: Spencer Jones has a 61.7% contact rate in AAA. Under sixty-two percent! Excluding the shortened 2020 season, there has not been a single qualified hitter with a contact rate that low since Joey Gallo in 2018.

If you want to know what Spencer Jones’s career might look like, you can look at three different stages of Gallo’s career.

If things work, it will look like Joey Gallo in Texas.

If they go about as expected, it will look like Joey Gallo in NY.

If things don’t click, it will look like Joey Gallo in Washington.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’d use Justin Maxwell as the comparison because of what a great career Joey Gallo had.

I also agree with everything you wrote.

EBMANMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It’s worse when every report was like “yeah this kid can’t identify a breaking ball”.. Shocker he still can’t!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  EBMAN

Shades of Lewis Brinson. But we didn’t know it because Brinson’s AAA affiliate was at altitude.

Pretty much every single pitcher has one breaking ball, which means every single pitcher has an out pitch against Williams!

grandbranyanMember since 2017
9 months ago

Interesting with Griffin over Made. I know the FV and actual report are more important than the ordinal ranking, but if you told me there were two 65 FV position player prospects, one a Pirate & one a Brewer, I know which one I would tend to favor give each organization’s track record.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  grandbranyan

I’m all in on Griffin as a #1 prospect. This guy looks like he’s going to be the next Julio Rodriguez. Who has averaged over 5 fWAR a year since he came up.

Made is a very exciting prospect but he’s just so young that we don’t know what direction he’s going to go. He is going to take a little while to develop, mostly just because he’s so young. It’s extremely rare to say an 18 year old is nearly guaranteed to be a big leaguer of some kind unless he gets hurt, and I think he will be. But we have no idea what kind of big leaguer he’s going to be. He could be between a 45 and a 70 on any of his hit, game power, fielding, or arm tools. How do you put a grade on a player who looks like he will be somewhere between Eduardo Escobar and a switch-hitting Nomar? That’s I think where we’re at.

OkraMember since 2016
9 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think you are really underselling Made’s defense. Go back and watch the fantastic defensive video montage Eric put together of him. He’s an easy 60-70 defender for me. Elite athleticism and he already makes all the routine plays and some exceptional ones. And he’s only 18.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  Okra

Let’s see how his mobility changes as he matures.

There are so many possible outcomes with Made.

jdbolickMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I don’t know what this is supposed to mean. Made is an exceptional athlete and a fluid defender. Griffin is the one I would worry about outgrowing shortstop, as he’s so large already.

OkraMember since 2016
9 months ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Agree. Made is listed at 6’1″ 187lb and honestly doesn’t even look that big. He could put on 20lbs of muscle (not easy) and still not be bulky. 6’1 207 with his athleticism looks like an NFL WR.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  jdbolick

I don’t think Griffin is a shortstop. I think he’s a center fielder.

jdbolickMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  Okra

I don’t mind Griffin being ranked higher because of how he performed in AA, but Made has a far superior hit tool and far superior fielding. Of the two, he has a much higher floor with an equally high ceiling.

tmcgowanMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Remindme! of evaluating this comment in 2028 with the ‘far superior’ comment

jdbolickMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  tmcgowan

To be honest, I love going back to old comments sections and searching my username. For instance, here is a gem from 2015:

Having seen both Devers and Moncada in person, I would have swapped the two on Kylie’s list. Devers is by far the more professional hitter, with rare comfort in driving the ball to any part of the field along with superior bat control and contact skills. He will drive the other way on an outside pitch whereas Moncada prefers to pull everything. I realize how insane it sounds, but Devers is not a 20 PV, as I believe that he could hit ~.250 in the major leagues as an 18 year old. He is that advanced at the plate. Despite the low walk rate, he doesn’t chase pitches out of the zone. He takes balls, he’s just so gifted at contacting the ball that it’s going to be rare for him to have four consecutive pitches within an at-bat that he doesn’t put in play.

Essentially what I’m saying is that Rafael Devers is an extremely rare talent (and as an Orioles fan it makes me nauseous that Boston has him). Robinson Cano and Pablo Sandoval comparisons have been tossed around, with Cano being more similar at the plate but Sandoval being more similar physically (not in terms of a current weight issue, just lower body thickness) For me, Devers at #20 is insanely low given how depleted the minor leagues are currently. The only guys I would put ahead of him are Buxton, Seager, and maybe Giolito.

tunglashrMember since 2016
9 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

If Eduardo Escobar is your floor, that is an incredible prospect. I think we get too lost on what the prospect numbers actually mean: a 50 is ‘average regular’, essentially a 2 win guy. Escobar played 13 seasons in MLB and racked up almost 16 WAR, with his best seasons near 4 WAR. In a vacuum it would be foolish to take virtually any prospect over guaranteed Eduardo Escobar.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  tunglashr

Because Griffin has a similar floor and is closer to the majors? I am trying to come up with a way Griffin fails and I can’t aside from injuries, kind of like with Made.

But I think we know what Griffin is going to look like.
Julio Rodriguez is at the top of the “normal” range but you can line up a list of excellent, well-rounded right handed center fielders and you see him in them. BJ Upton, Starling Marte, Aaron Rowand, Shane Victorino, Torii Hunter…this is a crazy exciting prospect.

Sonny LMember since 2017
9 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

When I went to an LSU game and saw Dylan Crews my LSU fan friends got very mad at me when I said he looks like Shane Victorino. Victorino was an incredible ball player yet they were insulted.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  Sonny L

Shane Victorino had almost 30 fWAR in his career! Dylan Crews was not likely to be another Andrew McCutchen or Mike Trout, and neither is Konnor Griffin. A guy who puts up a handful of 4+ win seasons like Victorino, Starling Marte, or Torii Hunter is a huge win for any prospect. These guys make all-star games and are good enough to bat in the top half of the order on playoff teams.

OkraMember since 2016
9 months ago
Reply to  grandbranyan

Meh. Not sure I’d ding Griffin just because he’s a Pirate. Would you have said the same about Witt being #1 prospect just because KC never develops hitters? I don’t think org matters as much for elite talents.

TommyfastballMember since 2016
9 months ago

Thank you for putting this out!

wheelhouseMember since 2022
9 months ago

Recency bias aside, where would Schlittler rank among the pitching prospects on this list were he still eligible?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  wheelhouse

He looks like a 55 to me if we’re going strictly by the WAR benchmarks Eric lays out (where a 55 has been 2.5 and 3.4 WAR), but if you think he’s a 60 I’d buy it. I think he’s going to be in the 3.0-3.9 fWAR range. Assuming his arm doesn’t fall off, which is always a worry when your fastball averages 98.

sandwiches4everMember since 2019
9 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Given his draft status, even a 50 would be like rifling through the couch cushions for a quarter and finding a twenty. And the quarter.

lewisletterman
9 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

If his fastball is going to average 99mph with perfect control, with three different movements and make major league lineups look helpless, you sort of throw out the 55, 60 fv nonsense and give him a 70 plus and don’t even bother projecting his fWAR until you have more data on him. Eric was projecting him mostly when he was more a 95mph guy in the minors. He barely threw 100mph in the minors and it seems Matt Blake found another gear and he keeps getting stronger. That is why Schlitter is so crazy cause he blows up all the scouting and future projections. It’s like an exciting NBA prospect who all of a sudden grew 6 inches and improved his 3pt shot. He goes against the norm and that always scares projectors and scouts cause they like to have everything in a tight little box and are very hesitant to move off their projections. Keith Law saw Schlitter in July, didn’t think much of him, and thought he was a back of the back-of-the-rotation guy at best. That wasn’t a back of the rotation guy we saw last night. With these new pitching labs, a lot of the old ways and grading might be outdated.

Eric was not projecting the guy we saw last night. That Schlittler is on a different planet. Maybe he blows his arm out, but that can be said about everyone on this list and every player ever.

Last edited 9 months ago by lewisletterman
A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  lewisletterman

Nobody is as good as their best performance, nor as bad as their worst. On the year, Schlittler has a below-average BB%, an above-average K rate that doesn’t quite comport with whiff and chase percentages, and a FIP (and xFIP) that’s in the 3.7 range. Schlittler has been trending up, so he’s certainly not the back-of-the-rotation guy that Keith Law saw, and he’s probably better than the 50 FV that Eric gave him before he graduated. I think a 50-55 FV is the conservative take, with more upside if the command he showed yesterday is the real deal.

But yes, the stuff improved tremendously, and I don’t remember any evaluators thinking he was particularly projectable in that regard. Error bars on pitcher projections seem particularly large. McLean too–I don’t remember any evaluators projecting him spinning the ball like he’s shown. Glad it’s not my day job to write about such things.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  lewisletterman

The comment did ask “recency bias aside.” There are other pitchers who have had performances like that this year. Some of them are considered to be well established, but others are not. Jose Soriano had a game like that. Misiorowski had multiple. Maybe see how he manages this stuff over a full season before proclaiming him to be on the same level as Skenes.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
9 months ago
Reply to  lewisletterman

100 mph with three different fastballs was something to behold. It isn’t like he had been getting knocked around before this performance that definitely did not come from out of the blue. I didn’t watch his start against the Orioles but the line looks as good as what he showed the baseball world last night. One more like these last two and he will challenge Chandler for the top spot on the list.

sa1251Member since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  lewisletterman

Easy there

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

In a recent chat, Eric called him a firm 3 who might be a 2 (by *Eric’s* standards!).

So yeah, 55/60.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago

That’s more like a 60 by the standards he has laid out.

I certainly wouldn’t disagree with that. He’s got a lot going for him. He just has to not get hurt, which is the major thing I worry about with guys who have big velocity jumps like that.

Petey BienelMember since 2019
9 months ago

Any thoughts on Susana? Injury drops him to the bottom of the tier, but did his appearances show anything of note to you? BB rate spike indicate relief risk or likely the injury?

Last edited 9 months ago by Petey Bienel
Pirates HurdlesMember since 2024
9 months ago

So, we have the best hitter and best pitcher prospect in the game to go with Skenes and company on the mound. Cherington and Nutting will be hard a work to screw this up.

OkraMember since 2016
9 months ago

Maintaining a bottom 3 payroll is easy! So much less work.

juliusMember since 2021
9 months ago

And some dude named Skenes in the bigs. If they knew how to fill out the rest of the roster, this team could go places. (Of course I know they won’t, but hey a guy can dream)

bookbookMember since 2024
9 months ago

Let me tell you a story about a team of yore that featured prime Ken Griffey Jr., Randy Johnson, Alex Rodridguez, and Edgar Martinez…. All post-prospect, established superstars.

Never won a thing.

tmcgowanMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  bookbook

My SNES playing days demand you retract that statement because of Ken Griffey Jr’s WINNING RUN!

“Get out the rye bread and mustard grandma! ITS GRAND-SAL-OMY TIME – MYYYY OOO MYYY’

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago

Feels like the huge gap between the 55s and 60s has a bit since the last update. I think that’s because I’m feeling pretty good about Emerson, De Vries, McLean, and Doyle. And Painter sliding down I think helps close the gap a bit too because I think he will be fine in the end.

But I really don’t see how Carson Williams and Ethan Holliday belong here, though. I get it, there’s a ton of power for an infielder but I just don’t believe that most of these guys who don’t make contact are going to suddenly start. I’ve been lower on them than everyone else for a while so I guess this is nothing new, but I think that I just don’t believe in guys with bad hit tools to fix it, whereas others see the upside first.

OkraMember since 2016
9 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Agree on Williams and Holliday. Also shocked that Painter is still a 55. In what other instance would you weigh so heavily what a guy did 3 years ago in mostly A ball? Pitchers bust all the time due to injury and Painter just didn’t look great this year finally getting back to pitching. Bad fastball, lack of command, and homer prone. I’d take any of Messick, Tong, Anderson, or Yesavage over him.

basically baseballMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  Okra

Sad for you

Graham LewisMember since 2019
9 months ago

I’m very surprised to still see Whisenhunt this high. He looks like a 2-pitch guy with poor velocity and poor command who took a step back this year. You think he’ll find the velocity again and the changeup will play?

kevo8Member since 2020
9 months ago

A bit surprised to still not see Dylan Beavers here after his successful time in the show and placement on other lists; any major concerns?

tdmocMember since 2023
9 months ago
Reply to  kevo8

He bumped him up to 45 in the 2025 update, must still have a platoon grade on him. Good player, just not an every day regular, I guess.

jdbolickMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  kevo8

Beavers is a jack of all trades but master of none. As an O’s fan, I’m happy that reducing his pre-swing movement worked so well, but none of his tools stand out. He’s not as good a fielder as Cowser and he doesn’t have Kjerstad’s power, but he doesn’t have their contact concerns. I see Beavers being a ~1.5 WAR player.

I do worry that he’s too passive at the plate, which often puts him behind in the count. His Z-Swing% is extremely low, and most of the guys who make that work have more power.

Mark SchneiderMember since 2020
9 months ago

Surprised not to see Sal Stewart here, what did he do wrong?

CC AFCMember since 2016
9 months ago
Reply to  Mark Schneider

Failed the military’s new height/weight standards. Was demoted to administrative DH duty

Last edited 9 months ago by CC AFC
jdbolickMember since 2024
9 months ago

#21 feels way too high on Ethan Holliday for me. His pro debut only served to validate my concerns over his hit tool.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Right now he looks like Mat Gamel.

I used to think he was going to be like Pedro Alvarez except he wouldn’t glitch at third base and have to move to first. He’s young but he has a very long way to go.

casey jMember since 2026
9 months ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Is it normal for players to go from high school straight to full-season A ball? In that case, his 18-game stretch with Fresno looks pretty good: 12 walks, 17 Hits, 2 homers, scored 14 runs, played decent SS every day. Playing vs 21-year-olds

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
9 months ago

I am quite surprised that Early didn’t make an appearance on this latest list. He has made five starts at the major league level and in every one of them has shown the ability to pitch effectively. The numbers are very, very good. 19 innings, 29 K’s vs. 4 BB’s with no home runs allowed. Last night was a blooper and a couple of ground balls that snuck through along with an error that beat him but he still looked good. I have read player evaluations for many years and one thing always sticks out. Once a player is initially valued it takes a lot, either good or bad, to change that original assessment. This type of performance, on the biggest stage, in the heat of a pennant race would seem to be enough to jump him over many players with very little on their resume.

CC AFCMember since 2016
9 months ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

It turns out Connelly Early is not a real baseball player. He was actually just a Boston constable from 1923-1931. Sorry for the confusion

jdbolickMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

Early’s numbers are exceptional, but he defies categorization because there is no easy explanation for why his numbers are exceptional. His velocity is slightly below average, his spin rates are below average, and his command is roughly average. There is no denying the success of his pitches thus far, but when you lack obvious qualities to explain that success, people are less likely to believe that it can be sustained.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Yeah – you never want to go all in on Aaron Small.

darren
9 months ago

If you’re going to troll Red Sox fans, why not go all the way and use Aaron Boone or Bucky Dent?

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
9 months ago
Reply to  jdbolick

That is the same answer that has been repeated endlessly since I started following baseball. The eternal question of performance vs. tools. At this stage there are two numbers that jump off the page at me and they are the extremely high strikeout rate at every level which continued in the majors and the extremely low HR rate which also continued. He has yet to give up a home run in 23 innings. These numbers indicate that there is something there that the industry is missing. I watched almost every pitch he threw and I saw lots of movement on all his pitches. I have had enough of touted prospects failing 10 times before they are finally tossed aside and lesser prospects having to prove it numerous times before being accepted as a major leaguer. Early’s performance, as you said, has been exceptional, not just average, and should warrant some recognition.

jdbolickMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

At this stage there are two numbers that jump off the page at me and they are the extremely high strikeout rate at every level which continued in the majors and the extremely low HR rate which also continued. He has yet to give up a home run in 23 innings. These numbers indicate that there is something there that the industry is missing.

The strikeouts do. The home runs do not. That’s just luck. We know from decades of historical data that there has never been and never will be a starting pitcher who can indefinitely sustain a HR/FB% below 7%. Andy Benes is the lowest in history for anyone with over two thousand innings at 7.6%, and the next lowest is Matt Cain at 8.3%.

As a general rule, pitchers will regress toward 10%, and ground ball pitchers like Early tend to have higher rates than fly-ball pitchers simply because pitches with sink get hit harder if the batter can elevate them. Early posted a HR/FB% of 13.3% in AAA this season, so his 0.0% in the majors isn’t indicative of anything at all. He has no unique home run suppression ability, he was just lucky.

Early’s performance, as you said, has been exceptional, not just average, and should warrant some recognition.

We do recognize it, we’re just not sure if it will continue. Like I said, it’s easier to believe in a pitcher when they’re doing something quantifiable. Guys who increase velocity get moved up the rankings. Guys who increase their drop or run get moved up the rankings. Guys who improve their command get moved up the rankings. Early’s dominance comes from his deception, which isn’t something we can easily evaluate.

Furthermore, Early has only been dominant for one season, as he was more good than great in 2024. You know who else had one dominant season in the minors, then a hot first month in the majors? Kristian Campbell.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
9 months ago
Reply to  jdbolick

The only HR rate that counts is the ratio of HR’s to innings pitched. The HR/FB% only means something if the pitcher allows a high percentage of fly balls which Early never has. It doesn’t mean a thing if you keep the ball on the ground. I am not attempting to make Early out to be the next Sandy Koufax but I think his performance warrants a spot in the Top 100.

katmanisaliveMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

So, let’s do some quick math to debunk the complete bad faith argument that HR/FB doesn’t matter for a groundball pitcher.

Early has pitched 23 innings in the MLB including the postseason. He has given up 8 earned runs for a 3.13 ERA. Quite good.

In those 23 innings he has given up 23 fly balls. Based on his minor league statistics, his fly ball rate has been a little elevated in the majors. Let’s say that between him getting more ground balls or out performing league average HR/FB that he would, on average, only give up two home runs on average in this time frame.

Presuming that we assume that those are just two solo home runs, that would raise his ERA to 3.91. We wouldn’t be having a conversation about him needing to be on the top 100 if he had a 3.91 ERA.

None of this even considers the fact that his elevated fly ball rate is primarily driven by a unsustainable drop in his line drive rate, which additionally helps him considering liners are the most likely type of batted ball to be hits.

darren
9 months ago
Reply to  katmanisalive

 We wouldn’t be having a conversation about him needing to be on the top 100 if he had a 3.91 ERA.

Using his ERA for 5 MLB starts and then tweaking only to account for his low HR rate doesn’t seem sound. For example, by adding those 2 HRs, you’re raising his already high BABIP to .439. XFIP, if I understand it correctly, attempts to correct for HR/FB luck.

AAA XFIP: 2.95
MLB XFIP: 2.35

Even if we assume a 3.91 ERA in the Majors, yes, we would still be talking about him being a top 100 prospect. Brandon Sproat had a 4.24 ERA in AAA and a 4.79 ERA in MLB this year. He’s ranked #51.

jdbolickMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  darren

Sproat is ranked more highly because he throws 2.5 mph faster, has the same 60 rated slider and change as Early, but has a higher rated fastball and better command.

darren
9 months ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Yeah he was a bad example–he was already an established top prospect so he didn’t really need to prove anything either.

I do think my overall point stands. Put another way, even granting your two theoretical homers (which I think is reasonable, his numbers would be:

MLB: 23 IP, 35 K, 5 BB, 2 HR, 3.91 ERA, ~2.35 FIP

Those numbers are eyepopping. Combined with his time in the minors, they seem like enough to push him into the back end of the top 100.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
9 months ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Go take a look at Mike Garcia, an outstanding pitcher for the Cleveland ball club in the early 50’s. One season he gave up 6 HR’s in 258 innings and 9 in 292 in another season. The results actually count. Keeping the ball in the park is a lot more than luck.

darren
9 months ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Yes, there are examples of prospects who didn’t live up to the hype, but citing one (a position player no less) to argue against Early’s prospecthood is not convincing. You know who has zero years of greatness or even goodness in the pros? Kyson Witherspoon, who’s rated ahead of Early.

On the question of HR prevention, you can’t just throw out his numbers because they were too good. No, no one thinks he will sustain his 0.0 percent HR rate in the Majors. But his excellent HR prevention numbers throughout the season are a point in his favor, even if there was some luck involved.

Last edited 9 months ago by darren
jdbolickMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  darren

Yes, there are examples of prospects who didn’t live up to the hype, but citing one (a position player no less) to argue against Early’s prospecthood is not convincing.

I cited a Red Sox prospect because you and bosoxforlife are so obviously biased about Red Sox prospects.

On the question of HR prevention, you can’t just throw out his numbers because they were too good. 

Yes, you can, and I provided the historical data showing why you should.

But his excellent HR prevention numbers throughout the season are a point in his favor

Early doesn’t have excellent HR prevention numbers. He had a 13.3% HR/FB rate in AAA and he had an 11.7% HR/FB rate in 2024. Registering a 0.0% over just 19.1 major league innings is nothing more than small sample noise.

darren
9 months ago
Reply to  jdbolick

I cited a Red Sox prospect because you and bosoxforlife are so obviously biased about Red Sox prospects.

Well even I, despite my incredible bias, spotted this as a bad comparison. As a dumb Red Sox homer, though, I have another comp: Jon Lester! When he was 23, he had a 4.57 ERA in the Majors. Early’s is half that so he’ll be twice the pitcher Lester was. Checkmate!

darren
9 months ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

The FG rates his fastball 50/50, slider 60/60, and changeup 55/60. That seems like a pretty good explanation for his success. It has his command at 35/45 and his writeup indicated that improvement there (or proving his durability) would place him in the top 100. There’s a decent argument that he’s improved that enough.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  jdbolick

It’s the deception and extension. Deception is something that is super hard to quantify. Extension can be quantified but I don’t think we can quantify how uncomfortable it makes hitters when both of those boxes are checked.

He also does have good control even if it’s not really good command, and he has pretty good velocity for a lefty. 94 MPH is in the same range as the most recent iterations of Carlos Rodon and Robbie Ray.

I obviously don’t think he’s 20 FIP- level good, or 55 ERA- level good, but I think he’s done enough to think he’s going to be rotation member for a while, and has a decent shot of being good enough to pitch in the playoffs. Clearly hitters do not find it an easy at bat.

rickdugo3000
9 months ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

Connelly Early’s blurb from the Red Sox list, from 6/25/25: “This is a potential offseason Top 100 prospect if one or both of the command and durability boxes get checked throughout 2025.”

Since that was written he was promoted to AAA, where he struck out 36 against 11 walks in 28 innings, and then to the MLB, where he struck out 29 against 4 walks in 19.1 innings before striking out 6 against 1 walk in 3.2 innings in a playoff game while being babip’d to death

Oh yeah and he didn’t get hurt

Last edited 9 months ago by rickdugo3000
darren
9 months ago
Reply to  rickdugo3000

This was the quote that I thought of when seeing he was missing from this list. If it was possible for someone to check the command and durability boxes in three months, Early seems to have done it in AA/AAA/MLB:

73.2 IP, 93 K, 24 BB, 4 HR, 3.05 ERA
11.4 K/9
2.9 BB/9
0.5 HR/9
7 H/9

rickdugo3000
9 months ago
Reply to  darren

yeah that’s a top 100 prospect

that might even be a top 50 prospect, lol. can only assume eric forgot.

darren
9 months ago
Reply to  rickdugo3000

It’s possible he forgot but it’s also possible he has good reasons that he didn’t go into here because it’s an article about the players who did make the top 100.

aviariesMember since 2024
9 months ago

Freeland’s (and Rushing’s) stints in the majors have scared me a lot in that it feels like a lot of the Dodgers hitting prospects are far too passive such that they can’t really establish themselves as threats at the plate in the major leagues. I think of Andy Pages’ ascension from 4th outfielder to everyday player this year and it’s mostly come with a total reversal of that approach (to sometimes a maddening extent with how many balls he swings at). I’m not sure where in the org this comes from, or if it’s even a problem with the Dodgers in particular, but I’d really like to see a change.

Brian MartinMember since 2020
9 months ago

No Moises Ballesteros at all?

Hit stick seems more assuredly real— feels like a bona fides above average hitter as a DH who maybe can handle backup catcher and 1B for next 5 years. Age 21, .858 OPS in 500+ PAs in AAA and then .868 OPS in 66 PAs in the majors. That’s helping set a high floor even if he is a DH . What am I missing?

I know Eric only pegged him as Cubbies #6 prospect overall last winter with an overall 45 FV. But he seems to have solidly outhit that tag? No upward adjustment after a strong AAA at 21 and nice cup of coffee?

jacobteamMember since 2020
9 months ago

Still going to die on the Sal Stewart hill, huh? I admire you sticking to your guns and not caving to “group think.” FWIW, Kiley McDaniel likes Stewart just fine (ranked #31 overall).

scottborasMember since 2020
9 months ago

In all of the minor leagues, there are only 2 guys who merit a 65 and 5 more that earn a 60? I get it that prospect sites tend to overinflate potential, but when you’re this conservative you don’t provide sufficient separation between good, really good, and great. By comparison, BA has 2 70s, 9 65s, and 22 60s – a total of 33 players they project as exceptional to elite. With these grades, BA is “taking a risk” and distinguishing a cohort of players as superior to the rest. They may be right or wrong, but at least they’re placing bets and creating distinction. I’d encourage you to rethink your grading system.

20longyearsMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  scottboras

Respectfully, I disagree and like Eric’s approach. If 65 suggests a future all-star, it seems unlikely to me that there’s eleven of them on the board right now. Some will overperform their present grade and some will underperform, but turning out as an everyday regular (50 grade) seems a lot more likely. I like the numbers projecting likely result and being pegged to projected career performance more than I would like differentiation for its own sake.

darren
9 months ago
Reply to  20longyears

Who will fill out the All-Star teams in 5-10 years? It seems like most of those players should come from this cohort of minor leaguers. Only being able to identify 2 out of say 30-40 of those players seems low, doesn’t it?

Maybe that’s the wrong way to look at it, but I think the original post raises a valid question, even if it does so a little dismissively.

jdbolickMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  scottboras

In all of the minor leagues, there are only 2 guys who merit a 65 and 5 more that earn a 60?

Yes. This typically happens at the end of a season when the best minor leaguers of the year have been promoted and lost their prospect status.

By comparison, BA has 2 70s, 9 65s, and 22 60s – a total of 33 players they project as exceptional to elite.

And that doesn’t strike you as far too aggressive? The idea that there are currently 33 “elite” players in the minor leagues doesn’t sound remotely plausible to me.

If you’re familiar with the scouting scale, 80 grade anything is extraordinary and even 70s are rare. McGonigle has a 70 hit tool because his rate and quality of contact have been exceptional this season. As a fielder, he’s about average, his speed is a bit above average, and his power is good but far from elite. If you put all those grades together, how could he possibly be a 70 prospect overall?

Similarly, Basallo has 70 power but is average to slightly below average in hit tool, fielding, and speed. You definitely can’t give him a 70 and the hit tool questions even rule out a 65. I’m not even sure that the 60 isn’t too aggressive just because there are still questions about his ultimate position. If he can stick at catcher with that power, then yes, he’s a 60. If he’s a first baseman with that power then he’s a 50.

A true 70 prospect doesn’t appear every year. It might be five or even ten years before you see one who is so well-rounded and has such a high floor to justify that type of future value. Eric put a 70 on Jackson Holliday in 2024 and I said at the time that it was too high due to his questionable hit tool and fielding.

You sound like you want best case outcomes represented instead of likely outcomes, which is fine, but that’s not what prospect analysts are trained to do. A future value of 65 is a player who averages ~5 fWAR per season. Only nine position players and one pitcher have done that over the last five years.

Domingo AyalaMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  jdbolick

I agree with this, but I also wish there was a better way to decipher between prospects in the 45-55 range.

Last edited 9 months ago by Domingo Ayala
A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  Domingo Ayala

There unfortunately isn’t a lot of separation between those guys. There’s often a bigger gap between #1 and #10 than there is between #40 and #70.

sourbob
9 months ago

What did Owen Caissie and Moises Ballesteros do that kept them off the list?