2025 International Prospect Rankings and Scouting Reports

Wednesday is the first day of the new international signing period, so it’s time for me to share expanded and updated evaluations of the players from the class. An overview of the rules that govern signing international amateurs can be found in MLB’s glossary here, while more thorough and detailed documentation can be found starting on page 316 of the CBA and page 38 of the Official Professional Baseball Rules Book. Players have until December 15 to sign before this signing period closes.
Scouting reports, tool grades, and projected signing teams for about 50 players from the 2025 class can now be viewed over on The Board. Because the International Players tab has an apples and oranges mix of older pros from Asian leagues and soon-to-be first-year players, there is no explicit ranking for this amateur class on The Board. That said, I’ve stacked the class with a ranking in the table below, and as usual, that ranking will live on the International Players dropdown of The Board after most of these guys have finished signing in the coming weeks.
Below I’ll run down how I compiled this list, talk about the class as a whole, and then discuss how Roki Sasaki’s presence is impacting the proceedings.
How Is This Information Compiled?
My first step is to source rumored bonus amounts, often hopping on the phone with people involved with the international space to see which players they or their team have heard will receive a significant bonus, usually $1 million or more. That’s often about 50 players, and I’ve ranked 50 below. Despite it being against the rules, most teams enter into verbal agreements with players and their trainers/agents many months, and sometimes as many as three or four years, before their actual signing day. When a team and a player come to a verbal agreement and commitment to a bonus, other teams are alerted to the agreement, usually by the player’s trainer. Teams keep track of rival clubs’ bonus allocations to gauge the market and assess the total amount of money still available around the league, as well as to determine how much each team has promised to players. This is largely how I’m able to efficiently collect bonus information, a process that takes place in fits and starts over the course of a couple of years.
As the bonuses trickle in, I start to collect biographical data like a player’s position, date of birth, handedness, and measurables, with the measurables likely to have some error rate because of how much players this age can physically change in a short period of time. Once I have a fairly complete picture of the players expected to garner meaningful bonuses, I start to make more scouting- and evaluation-centric calls and inquiries to augment the initial bonus-based foundation of the list. Heuristics play a big part in that augmentation. Up-the-middle defenders, players with physical projection, and those who have demonstrated feel to hit tend to bubble to the top of the list, especially if the player exhibits more than one of these traits. Players who agree to deals during the early part of the calendar often stop showcasing for other teams, and it can be multiple years between when a player was last seen by rival clubs and when he signs, which creates huge evaluation accuracy variance in this market. I combine all of that with my in-person notes (rare in this space) and supplementary video analysis (more common than ever thanks to encrypted file sharing and players’ social media), plus one last pass at all the bonuses to try to make those as accurate as possible, and things are fully baked.
Of course, there are some holes left open by doing it this way. Chiefly, there are definitely players below my bonus threshold who are talented enough to be on this list, but I simply don’t know about them yet. Aside from team personnel who closely monitor their own guys’ progress during “the commitment window,” I haven’t found a way to capture those pop-up prospects across the whole league, and obviously the team personnel route creates issues with both objectivity and me telegraphing my sources. It’s up to the sub-$1 million bonus guys to separate themselves later this year when they start playing pro ball. Based on my sourcing, this year the Guardians and Phillies don’t have a prospect signing for $1 million or more, instead opting to spread six-figure bonuses out across many players.
A useful barometer for new readers: It might be helpful if you think about the Future Value grades here in terms of theoretical draft position. Scouting and comparing international players’ tools and athleticism to those of recent and upcoming domestic amateurs helps me to triangulate approximately where they’d go in a given draft, and assign them an FV based on that approximation. Players with a 50 FV tend to be top five picks in a draft, while a 45+ FV tends to go in the top 10, a 45 FV tends to be a first rounder, a 40+ FV tends to be a second-to-early-third rounder, a 40 FV tends to go in rounds three through five, and a 35+ FV is a sleeper type.
Almost every player who I have as set to receive a bonus of $1 million or more is included in this ranking, along with a smattering of players with high six-figure bonuses, guys who emerged as favorites of scouts or of mine throughout the process. Expected bonus amounts have been sourced via scout and executive word of mouth, and then cross-checked in the week leading up to publication. There are a couple of bonus amounts below where my sources were not in exact agreement. In those cases, the gap has tended to amount to a couple hundred thousand dollars. When players start signing on Wednesday, it’s likely some of the amounts below will be off by at least a little bit because of changes teams made late in the process (which is especially true this year). I’ll put official bonuses on The Board when they’re announced, but for now, those will live in this article. I have brief thoughts on this class as a whole after the table:
| Rank | Name | Position | Age | Proj. Team | FV | Proj. Bonus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roki Sasaki | SP | 23.2 | LAD/SDP/TOR | 65 | — |
| 2 | Josuar De Jesus | CF/SS | 17.2 | SFG | 45+ | $2,500,000 |
| 3 | Elian Peña | 3B | 17.2 | NYM | 45+ | $5,000,000 |
| 4 | Kevin Alvarez | 1B/LF | 17.0 | HOU | 45+ | $2,000,000 |
| 5 | Diego Tornes | LF | 16.5 | ATL | 45+ | $2,600,000 |
| 6 | Yorger Bautista | CF | 17.3 | SEA | 45 | $1,800,000 |
| 7 | Andrew Salas | SS | 16.9 | MIA | 45 | $3,700,000 |
| 8 | Crisopher Polanco | SS | 17.0 | TOR | 45 | $2,500,000 |
| 9 | Cris Rodriguez | RF | 17.0 | DET | 45 | $3,200,000 |
| 10 | Ruben Castillo | CF | 17.0 | NYY | 40+ | $1,500,000 |
| 11 | Dorian Soto | SS | 16.9 | BOS | 40+ | $1,200,000 |
| 12 | Raudy Reyes | SIRP | 16.4 | ATL | 40+ | $1,800,000 |
| 13 | Johan De Los Santos | CF | 16.5 | PIT | 40+ | $2,500,000 |
| 14 | Juan Thomas | SS | 17.1 | CHC | 40+ | $1,100,000 |
| 15 | Deivid Coronil | SS | 17.3 | SDP | 40+ | $900,000 |
| 16 | Daniel Hernandez | C | 16.9 | WSH | 40+ | $1,000,000 |
| 17 | Harold Rivas | CF | 16.7 | BOS | 40 | $1,000,000 |
| 18 | Juan Cabada | SS | 16.7 | CHC | 40 | $1,500,000 |
| 19 | Manny Cedeno | SS | 16.4 | NYY | 40 | $3,500,000 |
| 20 | Gabriel Davalillo | C | 17.2 | LAA | 40 | $2,300,000 |
| 21 | Ayden Johnson | 3B | 16.9 | OAK | 40 | $2,000,000 |
| 22 | Kenny Fenelon | CF | 17.3 | MIL | 40 | $1,300,000 |
| 23 | Shotaro Morii | TWP | 18.1 | OAK | 40 | $1,500,000 |
| 24 | Brayan Cortesia | SS | 17.2 | WSH | 40 | $2,000,000 |
| 25 | Kendry Martinez | 2B | 17.3 | SEA | 40 | $2,800,000 |
| 26 | Warren Calcaño | SS | 17.2 | KCR | 40 | $2,500,000 |
| 27 | Jhoan De La Cruz | SS | 17.2 | SDP | 40 | $2,000,000 |
| 28 | Juan Sanchez | SS | 17.3 | TOR | 40 | $1,000,000 |
| 29 | Jose Luis Peña | SS | 16.4 | BAL | 40 | $1,000,000 |
| 30 | Darell Morel | 3B | 17.3 | PIT | 40 | $1,800,000 |
| 31 | Royel Strop | CF | 16.6 | STL | 40 | $1,400,000 |
| 32 | Maikel Coret | RF | 17.3 | TBR | 40 | $2,000,000 |
| 33 | Elian De La Cruz | RF | 17.3 | ARI | 40 | $1,200,000 |
| 34 | Warel Solano | SS | 17.3 | TBR | 40 | $1,100,000 |
| 35 | Raymer Medina | SS | 17.2 | TBR | 40 | $1,100,000 |
| 36 | Kevin Defrank | SP | 16.4 | MIA | 35+ | $600,000 |
| 37 | Darwin Ozuna | RF | 16.8 | OAK | 35+ | $1,000,000 |
| 38 | Eliomar Garces | SS | 17.3 | TBR | 35+ | $1,600,000 |
| 39 | Haritzon Castillo | SS | 16.8 | MIN | 35+ | $950,000 |
| 40 | Wilfri De La Cruz | 3B | 17.3 | CHC | 35+ | $2,500,000 |
| 41 | Santiago Leon | SS | 16.6 | MIN | 35+ | $1,700,000 |
| 42 | Alejandro Cruz | 3B | 18.0 | CHW | 35+ | $2,000,000 |
| 43 | Lieberts Aponte | SS | 17.2 | CIN | 35+ | $1,900,000 |
| 44 | Yulian Barreto | SS | 17.3 | SFG | 35+ | $900,000 |
| 45 | Breyson Guedez | LF | 17.3 | OAK | 35+ | $1,500,000 |
| 46 | Djean Macares | CF | 16.7 | SFG | 35+ | $1,200,000 |
| 47 | Elorky Rodriguez | LF | 17.1 | TEX | 35+ | $1,100,000 |
| 48 | Christopher Acosta | SS | 17.0 | MIL | 35+ | $1,100,000 |
| 49 | Carlos Taveras | LF | 16.6 | MIN | 35+ | $1,250,000 |
| 50 | Kamuel Villar | SS | 17.4 | COL | 35+ | $1,000,000 |
This class isn’t awesome. There are some very, very exciting hitters at the very top, and there will undoubtedly be some good smaller-bonus prospects who emerge from this year’s class, but the depth of exciting prospects that we’ve had the last two years is not present in this group. There are roughly half as many “high-upside prospects” (colloquially how I refer to 40+ FV prospects and above) in this year’s class as there were last year. An inordinate number of hitters with utility type ceilings are part of this year’s class, guys who can really play shortstop but who might not hit, or who don’t have power, or who possess some other ceiling-limiting trait.
The Roki Sasaki Situation
If you’re reading this, you are likely already familiar with the background of this saga: Japanese phenom Roki Sasaki, who is still young enough to be subject to international bonus pool restrictions, is the elephant in the room of this signing class. The timing of his posting has given rise to several logistical and ethical dilemmas. The majority of teams promised most or all of their bonus pools to players long before they knew Sasaki would be posted this offseason, and have been courting him while the players they verbally committed to during the last few years wait in limbo. Successfully land Sasaki, and his new team will most likely need to break its verbal agreements with most or all of a signing class of Latin American teenagers in order to allocate pool space to Roki. The players Sasaki’s team cuts loose will then re-enter a market that, collectively, has very little money to spend because most of the other teams have also pre-committed the lion’s share of their available money. As of last night, several of the teams that had been pursuing Sasaki were notified that he would not be signing with them, leaving the Dodgers, Padres, and Blue Jays as the finalists.
This dynamic has caused a flurry of activity just before signing day. I have had multiple sources tell me that the teams that are in the mix for Sasaki have told their players, many of whom have been living and training on their complexes in Latin America for years, that they will not be signing on the 15th when the new period begins and will need to wait a week or so. (Sasaki’s posting window closes on the 23rd.) According to sources, these teams include the Dodgers and the Padres.
Fear that they or their clients might be cut loose and lose a game of bonus pool musical chairs has caused players and agents to proactively seek a stable home elsewhere with a team that still has pool space left. On Friday, the Pirates agreed to sign Darrel Morel, a former Dodgers commit, for $1.8 million, which is more than the approximately $1 million bonus my sources indicate he had agreed to with Los Angeles. Morel worked out in front of teams in Dodgers gear on Thursday, then had a new agreement the next morning. Elsewhere, the White Sox plucked outfielder Orlando Patiño away from the Dodgers yesterday (both Patiño and Morel finding new homes were first reported by Baseball America), and as I noted to Mike Ferrin and Jim Duquette on Sirius XM this morning, according to my sources, the Twins pried center fielder Teilon Serrano away from Los Angeles late yesterday. So far, each of these players has left the process with more money than they had agreed to with the Dodgers.
Now that Sasaki’s suitors have been narrowed down, the other activity to watch for is the trading of pool space and the potential breaking of agreements so teams have pool space to trade. Initial bonus pool allotments range from about $5 million to $7.5 million, and clubs can acquire 60% of their original pool space in increments of $250,000. Because Sasaki’s decision to come over now is costing him a couple hundred million dollars, it’s possible money is no object here and he will just as happily sign for $3 million as he would for $7 million. But should it become vital for any of Sasaki’s last three dance partners to accumulate as much pool space as possible, either to sign just him, or to sign him and some number of their other committed players, other teams will try to take advantage of this. What if the prospect you can pry away from the Dodgers or Padres is better than the one you were going to sign for that bonus pool space? We’re tantalizing close from being done with this kooky, quite rare situation and are approaching a time when we get to watch Sasaki pitch on our shores, but his decision to be posted now has had profound implications for the 2025 international class.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
Twins passing on the top players to sign more players. I have to think when dealing with players this age, that’s an ok strategy?
IIRC around $700K there’s a big jump in prospect value. Eric’s $1M benchmark is maybe more relevant now than in the past. But you don’t have enough room in the minors to develop 53 prospects anyway. If your team is giving out a lot of high six figure and low seven figure bonuses they are probably getting a good mix of volume and upside. Blowing $5M on one guy is risky, but only signing guys for $50K isn’t a great strategy either.
I wonder if there’s ever been any kind of deep dive on the hit rate of higher dollar International signings vs low dollar signings. It’s easy to use survivor’s bias and cite the Acuna’s, but there are tons of low dollar signings every year, so I’m not sure what that would look like.
My Bucs have sucked for years at either approach, so while I’ll root for their signings on this list, I don’t think anything will come of them.
International scouting is definitely that rewards relationships you build in a specific area. There’s a reason why some teams sign all their best guys out of Venezuela and not so much in the DR or vice versa.
Eric and Kiley have an interesting section in Future Value on this too. The Rays and Yankees apparently are looking for very specific things and often wind up competing against each other and no one else.
They signed all sleepers. Not sure I’m a fan. Not sure it matters a lot.
Of course, these deals are years in the making, so it might not be an intentional strategy to sign multiple lower ranked guys.
Considering we are talking about people barely old enough to drive I don’t think there really is a good or bad strategy. The majority of these guys aren’t playing MLB ever and the ones that do often aren’t the guys everyone thought would.
Jose Ramirez was signed for $50k. The Braves signed a kid named Acuna Jr for $100k. I think the Royals signed Salvy for literally magic beans lol.
It’s a high risk, high reward process for sure, but it’s not exactly throwing darts at a board blindfolded.
Focusing on hitters (since that’s where the overwhelming majority of the action is), by my count 26 guys who were IFAs had more than 3 WAR last year (an arbitrary cutoff but I had to stop somewhere). 10 of those 26 (J. Soto, Vlad, Yordan, Profar, Devers, Chourio, JRod, Tatis, Robles, and L. Garcia) were 7-figure signings. 3 more signed for high-6 figures (O. Cruz – $950k, E. Tovar – $800k, and I. Paredes – $800k).
In other words, half of the 26 position players who played at a comfortably above average level last year came from the top pool of international free agent position player talent, even though they’re less than 10% of the signings overall.
While everyone would love to think you’re just as likely to get an Altuve ($15k in 2007 dollars) as a Juan Soto ($1.5m in 2015), that’s not really how it works.
That said, the odds would get a lot better if the signing age were raised, or even if teams only started negotiating contracts with these kids once they’re actually eligible to sign instead of making handshake deals 2-3 years earlier.
I mean, your own post shows that 50% of the top guys were not high value IFA’s. So you basically typed a whole bunch of words to agree with what i orginally said lol.
But more to the point, you have a huge flaw in your examination because you are only looking at the “survivors”. IE the guys who wound up making MLB and were good enough to accumulate min 3 WAR. How many high value IFAs didnt have that level of success and thus are not accounted for? Without that its impossible to say anything meaningful.
If those 10 guys were out of a pool of 30 thats one thing. If it was a pool of 500 its something else entirely.
Its like saying 50% of 40 year old MLB players accumulated 3 WAR. Sure, but that doesnt account for the fact that likee 98% of players arent playing at 40 because they suck.
Is it just me, or does it seem like year after year Seattle does a very competitive job in this area of their player development pipeline?
I have also noticed that. The Guardians do too, although I don’t see them on the list this year.
Probably time to move the Brewers to the top of the list. It’s early on Made, but I don’t remember this much buzz on a DSL guy since maybe Julio (Made’s plaudits seem even more aggressive). Pairing him with Chourio feels like lightning striking twice within just a few years (to say nothing of other nice finds like Quero).
Ms were cultivating a narrative of having a golden touch with Julio and Noelvi Marte signing in back-to-back years but there was a pretty noticeable big gap between those guys and the current exciting crop where the international pipeline didn’t produce much (jury’s still out on Marte, frankly).
I think the hype train might have moved a little fast on Made but a year in he definitely looks like one of the better players out of his IFA class. De Vries is clearly #1 and I think Emil Morales is very likely #2. But I think you could make an argument for Made at #3.
The hype train moves fast on a lot of international signings because everyone wants to be first in recognizing the next big prospect.
It feels odd to me teams are making commitments to kids that are 12 or 13.
It’s very odd. Classic first-mover/prisoner’s dilemma problem. Everyone would benefit if everyone waited, but there’s no percentage in being the only team to wait until guys are actually eligible to start negotiating/signing them.
I’m confused, it feels like every player who has been told/decided to pursue a new team is projected to get substantially more money. Does that imply that the early “handshake” agreements are usually at the detriment of the player? And that theoretically more of them (at least those that are highly rated) should break their handshake deals – regardless of the Sasaki situation?
Just guessing, but I think we’re getting a biased sample here. The players most likely to jump ship at this point are the one’s who’s trainers know that they’ve outperformed their bonus. Whereas if you agreed on seven figures years ago but don’t think you can do better, you’re going to sit and wait with the agreed number in hand until the team breaks the deal themselves.
I would imagine there’s some survivorship also. I’d bet some of the players who have been told to wait have tried out for other teams also, and NOT been offered more money. So we don’t hear about it.
Yep. If Dodgers say “we may have to wait to sign you,” there is no incentive to wait if another team offers more money. If other teams are offering less, there may be an incentive to wait.
There are a couple of shortstops on that list that the Padres would have to cut loose. But at this point it seems much of the damage to LAD’s class has already been done.
It’s probably not realistic, but it would be kind of funny if Sasaki signs somewhere other than LA and then the Dodgers just sign all of the international players that team had prior agreements with.
It is an interesting situation for any team with remaining bonus pool amounts.
Whenever the J2 list comes out I like to go look at the projected tools to see if there are any players with extreme tools. Here are the ones I pulled out:
Cris Rodriguez: 70 raw power, 60 game power, 60 arm. A little slower with 40 run but that’s not a dealbreaker in right field necessarily. Signed to the Tigers. Somehow already has 60 present raw at 17. The Tigers like that type I think. I don’t know whether he’s worth a $3M bonus but if he can hit in complex / A-ball he’s going to shoot up the list.
Johan De Los Santos: 80 Speed, 50 field, 45 raw power, 40 game. Signed to the Pirates. Put up a 3.8 and 4.0 home to first. Probably we won’t know anything until he’s at AA, if he even gets there. But if he can hit AA pitching playing CF would give him a high floor.
Darwin Ozuna: 70 arm, 60 raw, 60 speed, signed to the Athletics. Projected 30 hit tool, so that is on-brand for them. Some others like him are Dorian Soto (Red Sox), Juan Thomas (Cubs), and Kenny Fenelon (Brewers). Soto is the highest-graded one, a switch hitting 6″3 shortstop. Fenelon gets a Mike Cameron comp (!!!) which seems borderline irresponsible, and Thomas’s swing is so raw from one side scouts think he should ditch it.
The Tigers used to love that type under Avila. They loved them some long levered 6’4″, all or nothing, high K/low BB, corner IF/OF guys..& none of them worked out.
Under Harris, the biggest thing has generally been controlling the strike zone or hit tool. If that holds true, a guy with 70 raw power that can control the strike zone is going to be a pretty good player unless he has huge swing & miss issues.
Yes! The White Sox got the 42nd ranked prospect!
I am not reading a word more of content until someone defines the random new projection system.
OOPSY here is my projection – I will not read anything until you explain a new projection system you just dropped with no info.
I think you are lying. Anyway, it is from fangraphs writer Jordan Rosenblum and he apparently has some info on his twitter. Fangraphs has had many projections over the years that they haven’t provided much info on.
Too bad you won’t be able to read this! Yet Another Projection System: A Brief Introduction to OOPSY
Pedro Strop was just in the league like ten minutes ago, how is his son already here?
Remember when Bob Costas said “praying to some dead relative for forgiveness?” Well it was actually for his son.
This system is so f’d up on so many levels. INTERNATIONAL DRAFT, FOR GOD’S SAKE.
choosing to read heavily into the reporting that 3 players previously set to sign with the dodgers now have new agreements with other teams, and no players with agreements with the padres or blue jays have change commitments.
Dumb question but why does Philly never seem to appear on these international ranking lists? Is it because of penalties due to signing FA?
This system, along with the draft, is an anachronistic offense to dignity and ethics. Every player should be a FA from birth and each team should be able to spend what it likes. There are plenty of people who’d be happy to buy the Mariners or Marlins and try to win; instead, MLB wants to ensure that players make as little as possible and restrict the talent pool, harming vulnerable people. This isn’t new, I know, but its persistence is only more egregiously awful.