The Real Truth Behind Derek Jeter’s Gold Glove — Revealed!
Yesterday, Major League Baseball announced that Derek Jeter just won his fifth Gold Glove at the age of 36. Many people greeted this news with a grin or an eye-roll; Aaron Gleeman pretended to be incredulous that Jeter was “denied a National League Gold Glove award,” while baseball-reference.com briefly posted a comment that said “We can’t believe it either.”
Unfortunately, I can believe it. To explain the reason that Jeter won his Gold Glove requires me to break the omerta of the baseball blogosphere, Thou Shalt Remind People That Jeter’s Defense Sucks. This creed is the reason that, as Joe Posnanski wrote yesterday, “There are ‘How did Jeter win another Gold Glove’ posts popping up every eight seconds on the Internet (there will be 48 new ones by the time you finish reading this post).”
(In order to renew my Fangraphs membership, every six months, Dave Cameron flies out to meet me in an unmarked parking garage in Washington DC, where I swear a blood oath by candlelight on a stack of Necronomicons never to write anything complimentary about Derek Jeter’s mobility or range. Cameron’s post about Jeter yesterday was faithful to our sworn mission.) The awful secret of Derek Jeter’s fifth Gold Glove requires a little background in a few of the more esoteric domains of human knowledge. This may be the most important blog post I ever write; if it is the last, dear readers, only you will know the truth.
Derek Jeter was born on June 26, 1974, or 6/26/74. Six plus 26 is thirty-two — exactly one less than 33, the maximum number of degrees in Freemasonry. James Downard and Michael Hoffman explored the Masonic conspiracy to kill John F. Kennedy in their controversial “KING-KILL/33°,” perhaps the most dangerous anti-Masonic text ever written. They noted that “Oswald may have undergone biotelemetry implantation in the Soviet Union while a ‘volunteer’ at a Behavior Control Center at Minsk.” “Minsk,” of course, is very close to Minka, as in Minka Kelly, Derek Jeter’s alleged fiance. Kelly has neither confirmed nor denied that she and Jeter are Freemasons of the 33rd degree.
Derek Jeter played his first game on May 29, 1995, but didn’t win his first Gold Glove until November 2, 2004: there were 3445 days in between his debut and his first Gold Glove. The base 10 number 3445 is 2652 in base 11; the base 11 number 3445 is 4526 in base 10; 4526 plus 2652 is 7178. During Derek Jeter’s career, no Yankee has ever worn the numbers 71 or 78.
In fact, this number is a code originated by the heretical Rosicrucian sect: the first is a page number, and the second refers to 1978, the year that both Pope John Paul I and Pope John Paul II ascended to the Holy See. On page 71 of “The Secret Doctrine of the Rosicrucians,” the Fifth Aphorism is revealed: “The One is the Flame of Life. The Many are the Sparks in the Flame. The Flame once lighted kindles everything within its sphere. The Fire is in everything and everywhere; there is nothing dark or cold within its sphere.” Five: the number of world championships and Gold Gloves.
“The Flame of Life” is an Italian romance novel first published in English in 1900. On page 55 — five for the championships and five for the Gloves — is written the essence of the Jeter animus:
Their number is made up of those who have drunk in your poetry, who have breathed the fiery ether of your dream, who have felt the clutch of your own chimera. It is made up of those to whom you have promised a stronger and more beautiful life, to whom you have announced the world’s transfiguration by the miracle of a new art.
Voters were powerless in the face of one with mastery over the transfiguration of the world. Derek Jeter is no mere mortal, and his fifth Gold Glove no mere reward for defensive excellence. It is his very birthright, as foretold throughout the ages.
I only pray that I will survive the revelation of these secrets.
Alex is a writer for The Hardball Times.
Holy crap.
I really took advantage of first comment, huh?
Not funny. Pointless.
Congratulations, you win the “most negatively rated comment ever” award.
Also great work on the article.
It must have taken a hell of a lot of work.
Either that, or you made it all up. Seriously though, who would be crazy enough to fact check this article?
I guess whoever voted for Jeter.
(ba-dum-tish)
Pointless>Humorless
Made me think of Cartman in The Mystery of the Urinal Deuce where he is explaining how Kyle stood the most to gain from perpetrating the 9/11 attacks.
I’ve got a raging clue right now.
shouldn’t this be a NotGraphs article?
this.
I agree. It’s hilarious, but if Frangraphs is goint to create NotGraphs, this seems like the perfect piece for it.
“(In order to renew my Fangraphs membership, every six months, Dave Cameron flies out to meet me in an unmarked parking garage in Washington DC, where I swear a blood oath by candlelight on a stack of Necronomicons never to write anything complimentary about Derek Jeter’s mobility or range. Cameron’s post about Jeter yesterday was faithful to our sworn mission.)”
truer words were never spoken. realize its a tongue in cheek comment but there is more than a little truth in it. Dave Cameron has made a career damning Jeter and the yankees. no doubt for ruining the Mariners 116 win season in 2000
Not to nitpick, but that was 2001. 🙂
There is no more honorable career imaginable.
Are you kidding?? JOSE CANSECO
now that was funny. weird and unnecessary, but funny. seeing as the season is over, there isn’t that much baseball going on, so the odd random post is welcome. props for random research! it may seem silly, but i bet this actually took a lot of work to come up with!
Awesome.
Another theory – he had the highest fielding percentage among AL shortstops. We all know that that’s a pretty weak measure of fielding ability. MLB coaches do not.
This kind of explanation kills me. Sure, fielding percentage is cleary a factor to MLB coaches, but to use it as an explanation for why he won misses a lot. Many players have had the highest fielding percentage at their position and not won. Joe Posnanski’s article brings up another possible explanation that goes beyond fielding percentage.
Why does everyone assume MLB coaches are nitwits? They have their jobs for a reason.
I don’t think they’re all “nitwits,” but it’s clear they don’t much about how to judge the best shortstop in the AL. I’m a big Yankees fan, but I’m not deluded enough to think that Jeter is more than an average fielding shortstop.
We don’t assume they’re nitwits. We believe that they are nitwits based on evidence like, but not limited to, voting Derek Jeter as 2010’s best defensive shortstop in the AL. Which is pretty damning evidence of nitwithood.
Haha, I remember when Charlie Manuel was coaching the all-star team. Prado made the team, and he had to ask an assistant what his first name was, and how to pronounce it during one of the pre-game interviews that are streamed on mlb.com.
I had a good laugh.
Charlie Manuel…nitwit proof…selected Omar Infante to the All Star team.
Wasn’t Harry Truman a double secret 34 degree mason?
I don’t know about “double secret” mason, but he’s listed on Wikipedia’s (Where else?) list of freemasons.
This reason for his winning makes more sense to me than the whole “he’s good at shortstop” nonsense.
hahaha this is too awesome.
0/10
Agreed. I hate humor. I don’t come to Fangraphs to laugh. I come to Fangraphs to be enlightened on very serious, weighty issues that determine the fate of the world. BASEBALL STATISTICS AND ANALYSIS ARE TOO IMPORTANT FOR THIS TOMFOOLERY
Petty much? It’s not like anyone campaigned for the award.
lame. weak sauce. dopey. does not belong. -1. this. just write about the braves. not funny. feeble. pathetic. tired. insubstantial.
The troll is back for another round.
I don’t think this guy is going anywhere, so I guess we may as well learn to communicate with that guy.
Single. Word. Responses. Indicate. Lack. Of. Coherent. Thought.
Please post this above and below where about 5 people did the same thing, but used single word positive responses. idiot.
There were a few 1/2/3 word responses, but this guy is the only one who managed 11 of them while only writing 20 words.
I fail to see the difference. Anyone that writes “This”, or “so much win” is adding as much as someone thet writes “Fail”, or whatever ‘this guy’ was writing. The only thing that the ‘this guy’s’ type add is a lot of negative votes.
If you can’t have a sense of humor about baseball, do what everyone else like you does, and go watch football.
Wow. That right there is a put down of epic proportions. Your wit is just staggering. Telling someone to go watch football because obviously intellectuals watch baseball, and only dimwits would watch football. That is pure genius.
I did a brief look at the Yankees’ fielders, and it appears that Teixeira, Jeter, Cano, and A-Rod were all significantly below average with range but above average in errors committed. Is it possible that the Yankees have an incredibly biased official scorer? It would not surprise me in the least bit.
I believe that there is a pretty good correlation to increased range and increased errors, because if you have a large range, you can get to balls that noone else can. More challenging opportunities=more errors.
It wouldn’t surprise you because you assume everything in the world is set to align for the Yankees?
I would not be surprised at all of the Yankees official scorer was biased. I have never liked Jeter at all. Actually, I have never liked any of the Yankees since Mattingly retired except maybe Paul O’Neil.
just referencing a lot of weird stuff doesn’t make something funny. not gonna hate, cos no one’s making me read it, but i wish the writers here would stop trying to be steve martin (cos you’re not) and just focus on the baseball.
Steve Martin is a dated reference. Dude hasn’t been funny since crack was big (the first time.)
The odd references aren’t what makes it funny. The parody of conspiracy theory is part of what makes it funny, and the other part is that it points out how ludicrous Jeter’s GGs are.
Steve Martin is god
hillarious and I’m sure it took a lot of work to do
so much win
Awesome article.
Brilliant.
Not one mention of who got jobbed.
Who deserved the award?
Alexi Ramirez, Cliff Pennington, and Elvis Andrus all were worthy candidates. In fact, half the AL shortstops would have been better choices.
Ramirez was noticeably better than the other two. As an A’s fan, I’d have been overjoyed to see Pennington win, but on the other hand, if this award functioned properly, the entire rest of the A’s infield would have won GGs, so I’d have been able to deal with Ramirez getting it.
Hey, it’s not Jeter’s fault the left and center fielders beat him to all those ground balls.
Maybe they deserve gold gloves too?
33 of them.
get your stories right before you write derek and minka got married last week november 5th as planned and the other BS not worth writing
Did they? I looked to see if they’d tied the knot but couldn’t find any credible confirmation online. I know that November 5 was leaked as the date back in January, but I hadn’t seen anything since then.
The first year of his 10 year deal was 2001
“6/26/74. Six plus 26 is 32 ”
3 squared(2) is 9. 7+4=11. 9/11
Numbers can prove anything.
I think I will stick to my theory that Rawlings prefers GG winners from big market teams and somehow influences the vote.
P is the 16th letter in the alphabet, F is the 6th, T is the 20th.
So, if you add 16 and 6 and then subtract 20, you get exactly 2. However, 2 of the letters are not in alphabetical order so you have to subtract 2. 1 letter is in alphabetical order so you have to add 1.
The calculation here is 16+6-20-2+1=1.
The 1 represents pft as the 1 person who thought Alex was actually trying to use those numbers to prove something.
On Bill Simmon’s podcast Buster Olney said that coaches basically don’t Gold Glove voting seriously at all (surprise surprise) and just go by basically whoever they can remember as a decent fielder (who’s an good shortstop? Jeter? ok, soounds good).
Anyway it’s fun to make of this stuff, so no complaints there really.
What is going on? It’s 2010, but Derek Jeter wins a GG and then someone references Steve Martin as a comedian to emulate. The end of the world must be nigh.
Please go back to nowhere. Anyone that uses the word ‘nigh’ is just trying to hard.
At least in Nowhere we are aware of the proper use of the preposition “to” and the adverb “too”. Feel free to visit anytime.
What’s with the number of readers as this site being so anti-intellectual? Why follow a site dedicated to educated analysis if you are going to be hostile toward education, in any format, in the first place? Disagree with the analysis or insight, sure, but to constantly rip on people for offering up thoughtful and informed observations or for using their faculties for an entertaining purpose (i.e., this article) is just ugly philistinism. And some of us know what the word “nigh” means because we read books–heaven forbid we have the gall to use it in a sentence.
What is with readers of this site all trying to outdo each other. Wait, look at how smart I am, look at look at me, I am the smartest in all of nowheresville. Look at me I’m so smart!. I use words like nigh and philistine in every day discussions, at the dinner table, and often on the subway, and by forcing them into a two sentence comment about a baseball article smacks of coming across like an elitist douche.
Nice! It reads like the Foucault’s Pendulum of baseball blogging. (Which book I highly recommend to fans of this post, who are looking for 500 more pages of this sort of thing.)
Personally, I blame the creators of LOST.
Meh.
As soon as some valid and credible award is created for fielding excellence, expect clueless coaches to continue voting for these irrelevant awards.
Glen Beck watchers will LOVE this.
Gah! You beat me to it. I imagined this entire thing being scribbled on a giant white board.
Hey Ellis, if you’re a huge Yankees fan…than you probably did not watch too many Yankees game. Come on…are you serious? Are you saying every coach and manager that voted for Jeter do not know how to judge a very good shortstop?
Jeter was definitely slower this year than last. He looked slower in every facet of his game – running the bases, swinging at the inside pitch, it was just a bad year. Last year I thought he really looked pretty good in the field actually, more often getting balls up the middle.
Whether you think he’s the worst fielder or not, there’s something to be said about only 6 errors from the SS position.
Yes, the thing to be said is “He can’t reach enough balls to flub them more than six times.”
I like how simply saying the post wasn’t funny got 155 negative votes. What a bunch of sheep.
Seeing my comment get negative 155 is way funnier than this piece. I wonder if a few people refresed the page and gave ne a lot of minuses or 150 people actually read it and decided it deserved a thumbs down. Also I’m not sayib baseball sites have to be serious I’m just sayin its not funny. Lookout landing is funny (usually).
Where’s Glenn Beck telling us that all the voters are on George Soros’ payroll and that this is saying that Jeter is an agent bringing about a one world government?
Excellent.
Not enough dinosaurs.
How about a much easier explanation of Derek Jeter’s golden gloves…since he has gotten his paws on another sexiest woman alive he deserves the gold glove…I mean a guy who can rock out with as many 10’s as he does clearly deserves an award from the players, coaches, and managers in baseball.
This article has some of the many obnoxious and arrogant undertones seem to plague the advanced metric culture. Completely unnececessary. How about providing an in-depth analysis on why Jeter didn’t deserve the award, instead? What a tool.
An article showing in-depth analysis on why Jeter didn’t deserve the award? Try looking at any advanced metric recently? It doesn’t take in-depth analysis to show that Jeter doesn’t deserve a 5th gold glove. I prefer the over the top free-masonry approach.