A Home Run That Must Be Discussed
A week and a half ago, there was a remarkable home run, which I like. I’m drawn to those kinds of things, and I almost can’t help myself but write about them. I was floored by the home run itself; it was one of the most obvious subjects ever provided to me. The only problem was then I didn’t write for a week. The moment passed. Usually, these things have to be written right away, or people cease to be interested. It’s been a while since the home run, now. People are thinking about other things. The Mets. The Mets are neat.
I feel like I have to do it, though. I can’t let it fade away — FanGraphs needs to have a post dedicated to this home run. It was sufficiently incredible that we’d be doing you a disservice by not putting something together. While I know the moment is gone, this is a home run with a longer life, a home run for which you needn’t worry about context. Come with me back to Saturday, August 15. We’re going to watch the Indians and the Twins in Minnesota. We’re going to watch them because, in the fifth inning, there was Eddie Rosario.
Rosario’s a 23-year-old outfielder in his first exposure to the major leagues. Before the year, as a prospect, Kiley placed him 16th in the Twins’ organization, and blah blah blah it doesn’t matter because:
All that matters is this pitch and this swing. And, I suppose, the result of it all. You’re looking at a screenshot of a developing, out-of-the-park home run. The pitch was thrown in an 0-and-2 count. As such, you’d figure Rosario would’ve been on the defensive. The pitch was thrown a few inches inside. As well, the pitch was thrown at shoulder level, and that’s not an exaggeration. The pitch was in, and at Rosario’s shoulders, and that pitch generated a swing, and that swing generated four bases and a run scored. The area where Rosario hit the ball was right around the area where Rosario initially held his hands, pre-pitch.
Pre-pitch. You see Roberto Perez calling for the high fastball. Sometimes, pitchers aren’t trying to throw to the glove, but in this case it was absolutely the intent. Perez wanted a fastball up, to blow Rosario away. Josh Tomlin threw a fastball up. As a matter of fact, Tomlin threw a fastball even more up than this. Let’s look at the same picture, only with the eventual pitch location included:
Perhaps that’ll drive the point home. If Rosario had stood completely still, he might’ve reached base, after being hit by a pitch. That would be a good outcome in an 0-and-2 count. He generated a better outcome still. Tomlin basically threw the pitch he wanted, and then a bad thing happened.
At this point I’m just giving you more images showing the same thing. Crazy home run. Slightly different perspective on a crazy home run. I’m not finished, either.
You deserve to see the play in motion. It would be a shame to go without.
The word that comes to mind is “swat”. It’s a word people use somewhat frequently when describing various hacks, but to me, this is especially like a swat, like Rosario was trying to bat away an irritating mosquito. It’s like there was a mosquito, and it was bothering Rosario for hours, and it eventually drove him mad and Rosario retrieved a baseball bat so he could try to end the mosquito’s life in the most punishing fashion. At some point in your life, presumably for fun, you’ve waved a baseball bat around all willy-nilly, like you’re clearing brush in the jungle. That’s how Eddie Rosario went deep.
Of course, Rosario caught the ball in front of the plate. It’s the only way to strike this ball with authority. Think about how quick the hands have to be. Some years ago, I remember reading about perceived velocity by location, and the theory was that pitches up and in look a great deal faster than otherwise identical pitches down and away. So this pitch had about maximum perceived velocity, in that respect, and Rosario homered above his own hands. In slow motion, the swing looks almost ordinary. Consider how amazing that is.
From Baseball Savant, here’s a plot of all left-handed home runs going back to 2008, playoffs included.
You see Rosario pretty clearly. There’s a crazy point above it, assigned to a Jason Kubel home run from 2009. However, I tracked that homer down:
That’s normal, not crazy. In other words, that weird-ass data point is just an old PITCHf/x glitch. So, taking that out of the sample:
Rosario’s homer isn’t the only homer that’s out by itself, but it’s the only such homer in that area. You could say that, over the PITCHf/x era, Eddie Rosario has the lefty home run against the pitch most up and in. That’s fairly notable, and while not every left-handed hitter stands in the same place, Rosario’s positioning wasn’t unusual. He was toward the front of the box, and he slammed a pitch more than four feet off the ground, and inside of the plate edge. It shouldn’t shock you that we hadn’t seen that happen before, at least for a while.
You have to feel a little for Josh Tomlin, who’s been rather homer-prone over his career. Since Tomlin debuted, he’s posted one of baseball’s very highest home-run rates, and sometimes it just isn’t fair. Tomlin didn’t do anything to deserve to give up a home run to Eddie Rosario. He did everything he wanted, and Rosario just punished him with a freak event. Could’ve happened to anybody. It’s not like Tomlin was overdue to yield a dinger, and you know he had to be frustrated. Maybe that’s part of the reason he gave up a homer to the next batter, too. That homer was easier to understand.
Interestingly, Rosario has seven major-league home runs, and this was another one of them:
For lefties this year, that’s one of the very most inside pitches hit out, so out of Rosario’s small dinger sample, he’s got two that are varying degrees of extreme. That allows you, I think, to reach some conclusions about just what kind of hitter Rosario is. Just based on those homers themselves, you can figure that Rosario likes to swing, and that he has decent power, especially to the pull side. You look at these swings and you figure Rosario probably isn’t all that disciplined. He nearly has baseball’s highest rate of swings out of the zone, and to go with 83 strikeouts, he has 10 unintentional walks. He has an OBP under .300, and a slugging percentage that’s close to .450.
You know this type. It’s the type that’s over-aggressive because, every now and again, a bad swing does good damage. Rosario swings at a lot of pitches, and through his experience, he’s learned to hit some of those balls really hard. He might be more capable than the average hitter of producing against pitches out of the zone. That doesn’t mean it’s a good thing; that just means, sometimes, Rosario makes a pitcher throw up his hands out of frustration. But that reinforcement from swinging at bad pitches makes it more difficult for Rosario to focus on just swinging at good pitches. When you think you can hit everything, you’re tempted to try to hit everything, and then that makes you problematic. In some ways, I wonder if the Twins would’ve rather Rosario not hit these pitches for home runs. That’s a weird statement, I know, but you have to think bigger picture. Bigger picture, I’m sure the Twins would love for Rosario to take a step forward in terms of his discipline.
But he’s a rookie, and here we are. Rosario has hit a very inside pitch for a home run. And Rosario has hit a very high-and-tight pitch for a home run. The most high-and-tight pitch, as a matter of fact. One of the things you can’t help but wonder about: where’s the limit? At what point does it become realistically impossible for a pitch in a spot to get hit out of the yard? I don’t know the answer to that, but thanks to Eddie Rosario, I’m getting a better idea.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.










Pablo Sandoval.
Exactly what I was going to say. That pitch was a few inches higher and further in than Panda’s first HR vs. Verlander in the WS but I know I’ve seen him hit basically this same location for a HR in the regular season before, I think against the DBacks? Let me search around and see if I can find it.
BTW, wish the clip here ran a little longer so I could see Tomlin’s full reaction. If it was me I think I would have eaten my glove.
I was at this game, and he was rather composed. It was his first start of the season, and he was just glad to be back out there pitching again. Tito said after the game that it’s a good thing that Rosario swung, because it (the pitch) might have hit him in the neck.
you are very good at your job, jeff.
Here’s what I want to know: did any of the announcers, from either team’s TV or radio broadcast, paint the pitch from Tomlin as a pitch that was “left up”, or that it was poor sequencing, or otherwise that Tomlin gave up that homer? Because my own personal, weird, obsession is with announcers calling every pitch that results in a hit a “hanger” or a “bad pitch”, and a pitch that results in a whiff a good pitch, even when ostensibly the opposite is true.
I guess I share this peeve to at least the extent that I’m always happy when a broadcaster goes out of their way to point out the non-confirming data points — the unhit hangers, or the good pitches that get hit hard. “The pitcher really got away with one there” and “He threw the pitch he wanted to throw, sometimes you’ve just got to tip your cap to the hitter” are some of my more favorite baseball clichés, epistemologically at least. I agree there’s huge variation in announcers on this: some (the bad ones) are pretty much 100% post-hoc, purely reasoning backwards from the results already on the field.
Can we make that: “some (the bad ones) are pretty much 100% post-HAWK HARRELSON, purely reasoning backwards from the results already on the field.”
http://www.heavethehawk.com/
I’m not sure if it’s masochistic or not, but I actually enjoy Harrelson. He’s a windbag, but he’s an entertaining windbag. He’s also come up with some pretty good nicknames. Plus, my wife and I like to shout, “He gone!” at inappropriate times…
Each to their own. My personal hell would involve scratching on chalkboard and Hawk saying “He Gone” for eternity. How can an announcer be so lazy as to have the need to shorten “He’s Gone” to a cavemanesque grunt of “He Gone.”
Objectively, Harrelson is the absolute worst at what he does on the entire planet. Unwatchable, unlistenable, unlikable. The. Worst.
I always thought the “hegone” call was the batflip of strikeout calls. Just abrupt and cocky and maddening to the opposing players and fans. It’s horrible but I still kinda like it, probably because i’m not specifically a ChiSox fan so I don’t hear it all that often.
When the home broadcast admits a meatball thrown by the home team is swung and missed was a bad pitch. That’s what never happens.
I generally only listen to Indians games on the radio, but I’ve definitely heard Tom Hamilton in disbelief that a visiting player would take strike 3 right down the middle; exclaiming: “I have no idea what he was looking for.”
You don’t watch a lot of Mets games, I guess.
Yankee games too. Sometimes they get lazy and just assume, but they will notice when a pitcher “gets away with one.”
I heard Don Sutton do this quite a bit. Drove me crazy.
Just went and checked out the TV feeds of it, out of curiosity. Here’s the clip:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTpUc_42g8s
Twins announcers: “How do you hit that pitch, much less hit it 400 feet?”
Indians announcers: “Boy, that ball looked like it was shoulder-height.” “Upstairs and inside, and he was able to get the barrel on it. I can’t believe it.” “It’s crazy that he even swung at that pitch.” “It’s tough to lay off, but I can’t believe he hit it.”
I guess both booths called it pretty appropriately.
thanks for digging and posting, Roger!
cool thanks!
This pitch is a pretty extreme example, so I’d be surprised if anyone called it as if it was a mistake pitch. It’s the more borderline ones where I feel the announcers are just guessing.
Yeah. Though to be fair to the announcers, sometimes the camera angle doesn’t help.
I would love it if, for the next MLB.tv game with the StatCast enhancements, they would use PitchFX and other tools to analyze whether the pitcher made a mistake or the hitter just did a great job of hitting. Or, if the hitter was Eddie Rosario
The Kubel home run, from the glitch way back when, appears to also be from a Twins-Indians game.
Tomo Ohka wore #16 for Cleveland that season, and he did give up a homer to Kubel in August 2009. It’s very possible that it’s this one.
That home run is f***ing crazy! Excellent article, Jeff.
Awesome! I want to see GIFs all those extreme HRs from that chart. Like who hit that one that’s way out there at 10 o’clock? Or that far inside one at 3 o’clock? Lowest pitch, highest pitch, most inside, most outside – I’m greedy, I wanna see ’em all!
Pretty sure that’s offseason_sullivan_columns.txt (and I’m also looking forward to it)
Just to add to the snowballing Rosario legend – he also hit a home run on the first pitch he saw in the majors earlier this year.
And this is a guy who had an 83 wRC+ last year in AA ball (.237/.277/.296 slash line)
If we can trust the radar reading from the live shot Jeff posted, the pitch was only 89 mph…and to Jeff’s point, Rosario very likely K’s on that pitch if the velocity was 91+.
If find the radar gun reading there interesting because it’s the perfect illustration to me of why a right-handed pitcher almost never succeeds throwing high 80s. Major league hitters are so talented, they can hit that velocity out of the park even when the pitch is at shoulder height.
Either that or they don’t get any hits at all
Or they just pop it up.
Or the hitter catches the pitch mid-flight and tosses it back to the pitcher.
And he probably hooks it foul if it was 87 mph. Talk about a perfect storm.
So he clearly did a great job of keeping his hands in and wrists back, I guess, to get the barrel on the ball without it being already so angled as to send it way foul. But even looking at the videos here it surprises me that it didn’t go foul. Was there a crosswind or something?
(Alternately, maybe he got his hands in and wrists back enough not to hook the ball? I’m not totally sure of the physics of batted ball spin…)
I was wondering the same thing after looking at the side view of his swing. I checked the data on Hit Tracker for this HR:
http://www.hittrackeronline.com/detail.php?id=2015_3367&type=hitter
I’m thinking that he was late enough on the swing that his bat was almost parallel to the front of home plate when he made contact. However, because of the high vertical angle coming off the bat (35 degrees), the 2-dimensional GIF gives the impression that he pulled the ball down the line, when really he hit the ball on a line between right-center and right field.
If that’s the case, I’m guessing that combination wouldn’t necessarily put a lot of sideways spin on the ball.
More importantly: why is your screen name not Feisty Panda?
Incredible. That is a gorgeous swing he put on that ball. Look at those hands fly through the zone. Utley-esque. heh. And the wrists on that dude. They must be incredible.
I was actually blown away by the Miggy-esque core strength he displayed here. I’m no swing expert, but once he’s gotten his hands in he needs a ton of upper-body torque to whip the bat through with enough power to send the ball at nearly 100 MPH.
If he ever learns plate discipline…..
One thing that gets talked up a ton about Rosario is his quick hands and strong wrists. He sure demonstrated that on the home run here.
Clearly he should have been a hockey player
What went through his mind the moment he swung? Normally if you pull the trigger on such a pitch you just try to foul it off (and his swing kind off looks like wants to do that) so I wonder if his thoughts where “Uh meatball, lets put it over the fence…”.
This reminds me of that Lucas Duda HR from last month. And this article. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/lucas-dudas-turn-with-the-anomalous-dinger/
Brian Dozier liked this article so much he hit the same pitch out last night. Not quite as impressive since he’s right-handed, but still amusing.
I was thinking Gary Sheffield…it is interesting that you see righties do things like this more often than lefties.