A Market Correction for Arbitration-Eligible Sluggers

In Major League Baseball, the market tends to correct itself as clubs gain greater knowledge of players and their value. If aging players are less successful, the market for that group might slow a bit. Bullpen arms become more or less desirable depending on their scarcity. Increased revenues tend to move everyone up the pay scale. It is important to understand how and when to make adjustments in value as run-scoring environments, finances, and aging patterns change.

That is all well and good for those who run organizations and those who follow the game closely, but the arbitration process is much less nuanced. The non-tendering of contracts to Pedro Alvarez and Chris Carter, along with the trade of Mark Trumbo, are all the result of a failure to adjust — within the arbitration process, specifically — as the market slowly corrects for the overpayment of defensively- (and sometimes offensively-) limited home run hitters whose overall effectiveness has dimmed.

The arbitration process tends to favor the traditional stats that place like FanGraphs have tried to de-emphasize. Closers get big paydays in arbitratio, regardless of overall performance. As a result, the St. Louis Cardinals opted to let Steve Cishek go instead of moving to arbitration where he would receive a salary of around $7 million. Home runs and RBI tend to get paid as well, causing an overpayment for those players who rack up those numbers, but have big deficiencies in other areas.

Consider the following players who MLB Trade Rumors predicted would get salaries in excess of $5 million in arbitration. The second column represents their predicted salary, the third column represents their predicted WAR by Steamer, and the third column represents the cost per WAR in millions of dollars.

High-Cost Position Players in Arbitration
Projected Salary ($M) Projected WAR $/WAR (M)
Luis Valbuena 5.8 1.9 3.1
Chris Carter 5.6 0.1 56.0
Josh Reddick 7.0 2.8 2.5
Ben Revere 6.7 0.8 8.4
Josh Donaldson 12.0 5.9 2.0
Brandon Moss 7.9 1.0 7.9
Justin Turner 5.3 2.7 2.0
Brandon Belt 6.2 3.0 2.1
Mark Trumbo 9.1 1.3 7.0
Dee Gordon 5.9 2.0 3.0
Lucas Duda 6.8 1.9 3.6
Wilson Ramos 5.3 1.7 3.1
Manny Machado 5.9 5.8 1.0
Pedro Alvarez 8.1 0.8 10.1
Neil Walker 10.7 2.6 4.1
Mitch Moreland 5.6 0.9 6.2
Nolan Arenado 6.6 3.9 1.7
Mike Moustakas 5.7 3.0 1.9
Lorenzo Cain 6.1 3.7 1.6
J.D. Martinez 7.8 2.5 3.1
Trevor Plouffe 7.7 1.7 4.5
AVERAGE $7.0 M 2.4 $2.9 M

The average at the bottom showing cost per WAR is the average of the totals. Chris Carter’s monster number does not have an undue influence. The chart above has a lot of good players. Manny Machado and Nolan Arenado are two of the best young players in the game. It is possible you have heard the $8 million per win as the going rate to buy wins in free agency. Here the number is less than half that, around $3 million, as arbitration salaries are purposefully suppressed by the system to which the players and owners have agreed in the collective bargaining process.

Let’s isolate those players above who are defensively limited by the position they play. I included first basemen and designated hitters, although Brandon Belt could arguably be left out as he can play some outfield.

High-Cost 1B/DH in Arbitration
Projected Salary ($M) Projected WAR $/WAR (M)
Chris Carter 5.6 0.1 56.0
Brandon Moss 7.9 1.0 7.9
Brandon Belt 6.2 3.0 2.1
Mark Trumbo 9.1 1.3 7.0
Lucas Duda 6.8 1.9 3.6
Mitch Moreland 5.6 0.9 6.2
Pedro Alvarez 8.1 0.8 10.1
AVERAGE $7.0 M 1.3 $5.4 M

Pedro Alvarez once played a poor third base, but was moved to first base last season, and could not do well enough there that he might only be a fit in the American League as a designated hitter. Chris Carter has limited time in the outfield, but played just six games there in 2014 and none in this past season. Lucas Duda was dreadful in the outfield, but has become a more valuable player since moving to first base. Mark Trumbo still played some outfield last season with the Mariners on a team with Nelson Cruz and Logan Morrison, but those experiments are likely (hopefully) over as Trumbo heads to Baltimore. Moss can play some outfield as well, but is generally defensively limited.

When you take away the seven players in this second table from the first table above, you are left with 14 position players. Every single one of them was tendered a contract for next season, while two players were non-tendered (Alvarez, Carter) and one was given away in trade (Trumbo). Brandon Belt was a no-brainer to keep and Lucas Duda was likely an easy decision as well, but for five of the seven players above, the team would have to pay, or is paying, essentially free agent prices for these sluggers, some of whom have not slugged as well lately.

Here is what the stat lines looked like in 2013:

2015 Non-Tender Candidates Back in 2013
Name PA HR BB% K% wRC+ WAR
Pedro Alvarez 614 36 7.8 % 30.3 % 112 3.0
Mark Trumbo 678 34 8.0 % 27.1 % 107 2.3
Brandon Moss 505 30 9.9 % 27.7 % 137 2.1
Mitch Moreland 518 23 8.7 % 22.6 % 95 0.6
Chris Carter 585 29 12.0 % 36.2 % 112 0.5

Here is what they looked like in 2014:

2015 Non-Tender Candidates Back in 2014
Name PA HR BB% K% wRC+ WAR
Brandon Moss 580 25 11.6 % 26.4 % 121 2.5
Chris Carter 572 37 9.8 % 31.8 % 122 1.8
Pedro Alvarez 445 18 10.1 % 25.4 % 103 0.0
Mitch Moreland 184 2 6.5 % 23.4 % 76 -0.6
Mark Trumbo 362 14 7.7 % 24.6 % 91 -1.2

And finally, their stats this past season:

Non-Tender Candidates in 2015
Name PA HR BB% wRC+ WAR
Mitch Moreland 515 23 6.2 % 115 2.1
Mark Trumbo 545 22 6.6 % 108 1.1
Brandon Moss 526 19 9.3 % 94 0.6
Chris Carter 460 24 12.4 % 101 0.3
Pedro Alvarez 491 27 9.8 % 114 0.2

It might be a bit unfair to include Moreland in the non-tender category as he is more in the “think about it for a bit, but then tender him” camp. The home runs were there for all the players at some point, which also means their salaries in arbitration continued to rise even as the overall production has not. Eno Sarris wrote recently about the possibility that we are undervaluing slugging first basemen and designated hitters as maybe they take too much of a hit for positional difference. Looking at the stats in the chart above, as well as the projections for these players, even adding a bit extra for the big positional loss is not going to do a whole lot to help these players overall. This is not just a WAR-related issue, either.

Organizations have decided these types of players are receiving too much money and backing that up with their actions. Alvarez and Carter were non-tendered; Mark Trumbo was essentially given away; the Rangers might be trying to trade Moreland; and the Cardinals have possibly kept Moss as insurance for if they fail to bring in anyone via free agency (making him potentially expendable, as well). The arbitration process is designed to suppress salaries ahead of free agency, and for the most part it does a very good job at accomplishing that task. For defensively limited home run hitters, the scales tip the other way, and at least this season, the market has made a correction.





Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eric
8 years ago

It’s worth mentioning that Justin Smoak goes against this trend as he avoided arbitration by signing a one year $3.9M deal that was almost double the amount predicted.

Arjon
8 years ago
Reply to  Eric

To what degree does MLBTR’s model take a player’s entire salary history into account like the arbitrators presumably can rather than just the immediate past season’s salary?

David the non-robot
8 years ago
Reply to  Arjon

In a chat the other day, Tim acknowledged that a player like Smoak who was previously non-tendered and then signed back for a lower dollar amount kind of breaks their modeling equations.

Rich Rieders
8 years ago
Reply to  Eric

That’s because they didn’t take into consideration his career stats. If a player’s previous salary was not derived from the arbitration process, you can’t simply give him a raise and call it a day like they did with Smoak.