Aaron Judge and the Greatest Postseasons of All Time

Wendell Cruz-Imagn Images

You may think you’ve already heard enough about Aaron Judge’s heroics during this postseason, especially considering that he wasn’t able to keep his team from getting knocked out barely a week into October. Heroes usually do a more thorough job when saving the day. I’m sure you’ve heard a lot about Judge’s 2025 playoff excellence. But I’d argue that you haven’t heard enough, because there’s a bit of context I’d like you to consider. That context? The entirety of postseason history.

Over the course of the American League Divisional Series against the Blue Jays, Judge batted .600. If you factor in his .354 batting average against the Red Sox in the Wild Card round, he batted an even .500 over 31 plate appearances this postseason. Now let’s head over to our handy-dandy postseason leaderboard. If you set a minimum of 30 PAs, you’ll find that Judge just ran the third-highest batting average ever over a single postseason; his .581 on-base percentage is the second highest. His 253 wRC+ is the 14th highest in postseason history (just behind the 255 mark that teammate Giancarlo Stanton put up in 2020). By that standard, Judge just produced one of the greatest postseason performances ever.

Greatest Postseason Batting Lines
Rank Season Name Team PA HR AVG wRC+
1 2008 Manny Ramirez LAD 36 4 .520 331
2 1968 Lou Brock STL 31 2 .464 312
3 1989 Rickey Henderson OAK 44 3 .441 308
4 2024 Fernando Tatis Jr. SDP 30 4 .423 303
5 1990 Billy Hatcher CIN 31 1 .519 294
6 2023 Yordan Alvarez HOU 49 6 .465 293
7 2004 Carlos Beltrán HOU 56 8 .435 284
8 1989 Will Clark SFG 39 2 .472 284
9 1967 Carl Yastrzemski BOS 30 3 .400 276
10 1978 Reggie Jackson NYY 45 4 .417 262
11 2002 Barry Bonds SFG 74 8 .356 259
12 1984 Alan Trammell DET 37 3 .419 256
13 2020 Giancarlo Stanton NYY 31 6 .308 255
14 2025 Aaron Judge NYY 31 1 .500 253
15 1980 Willie Aikens KCR 37 4 .387 253
Minimum 30 plate appearances

To be clear, those numbers are slightly misleading. We need to qualify them, but after I do so over the next couple paragraphs, I’m going to show you that even with all the right statistical context, this was still a very special run. Alright, now let’s do our sabermetric duty and throw some cold water on all of this.

The minimum of 30 plate appearances is important here. First, it rules out a huge chunk of postseason history. Until 1969, the postseason consisted only of the World Series, which sometimes goes as few as four games. To that point, baseball saw just 207 instances of players accumulating at least 30 PAs in a single World Series. No one ever made it to 40.

Next, the smaller the sample, the noisier the results. In postseason history, 171 different players have put up a wRC+ above 400, but none of them made more than 17 plate appearances and only five of them (including Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig in 1928) made more than 10. On the other hand, the larger the sample, the more time there is for regression to the mean. Judge’s 253 wRC+ is amazing, but it’s much less amazing than the 245 that Barry Bonds ran over 74 plate appearances in 2002. The graph below shows every postseason performance in baseball history. Judge is the red circle and Bonds is the green one.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

This certainly makes Judge look a bit less spectacular. He’s up toward the top of the heap for a player around 30 plate appearances, but he’s not standing out from the pack the way Bonds did. According to this chart, the most impressive performance in postseason history is undoubtedly Randy Arozarena’s magical, homer-filled 2020 run with the Rays, all the way to the right. With fewer than 100 regular season plate appearances under his belt, Arozarena somehow ran a 240 wRC+ over 86 PAs. He wouldn’t even win the Rookie of the Year until the next season! All of this is to say that Judge got just enough plate appearances to get to the point where he doesn’t really have to compete with players from before the divisional era, but few enough that he can still benefit from maximum variation. It’s a good sample-size sweet spot for looking like an outlier.

If we head over to Stathead and look not at whole individual postseasons, but rather postseason spans of seven games and at least 30 plate appearances, we find that 79 different players have put up stretches with a higher OPS than Judge’s 1.273 mark. It would be hard to argue that he actually put up the 14th-greatest postseason performance of all time. Now that we’ve put it in context, let’s talk about what makes it so special anyway.

First, it’s at least a little bit unfair to penalize Judge that harshly for the plate appearances he didn’t take. He did just about everything humanly possible to try to get the Yankees a deeper postseason run, and while his performance may have fallen back down to earth if he’d kept going into Game 5 or the ALCS, Judge has a career OPS of 1.018, and Stathead lists 189 different (though often overlapping) 15-game stretches during which he ran an OPS above 1.300. That’s a better performance over a period that’s twice as long. It’s not just possible that he could have kept this going; it’s something he’s done over and over again.

Next, if we go back to looking at complete postseasons, Judge is still an outlier even if you lower the plate appearances threshold. The list of player-postseasons with at least 20 PAs contains 10,842 entries. That’s a big sample, and within it, just 167 players have maintained a wRC+ of at least 200. Judge actually appears in the top 40 twice. He comes in 38th place this season, and his 2018 run of 22 PAs with a 284 wRC+ ranks 20th. By any measure, Judge has had two of the best complete postseason runs in baseball history. Moreover, he’s the only player who appears in the top 40 twice.

As you might recall, Judge was pretty good during the regular season, too. He led all of baseball in batting average (.331), on-base percentage (.457), and slugging (.688). He put up a major league-best 204 wRC+. That’s the 25th-highest mark ever among qualified batters, and it’s just the third-highest mark of Judge’s career! In the postseason, Judge increased his wRC+ by just under 49 points, an increase of 24%. Essentially, I just weighted Judge’s weighted runs created plus again, this time against his regular season numbers. It was fun, so I took all 167 of the individual player-postseasons with at least a 200 wRC+ over 20 or more plate appearances and weighted them the same way. Postseason wRC+ is on the x-axis, and the percentage above regular season performance is on the y-axis.

As you’d expect, the trendline goes from the bottom left to the top right. The better your postseason performance, the more likely you are to just be on a crazy, unsustainable hot streak that bears little relation to your regular season performance. The place to be is toward the the bottom right. If you’re down there, you’re putting up the best postseason numbers, but you’re not all that different from your regular season numbers. You’re performing well not because of an unsustainable streak, but because you’re just that good.

Now look at the two red dots. The one toward the very bottom is Judge in 2025, and the higher one is Judge in 2018. He’s right where you want to be. Few players have ever put up such a great postseason, and few players have ever looked more like themselves while they did it. If there’s such a thing as a believable 253 wRC+, Judge is one of just a few players ever to pull it off.

Before we finish here, I’d like to get away from wRC+, because as great as Judge was as an overall hitter, his batting average was probably the most impressive thing about this postseason. If you drop the plate appearances minimum to 20, he still just ran the 15th-best batting average in postseason history. If you drop it all the way to 15 PAs – that’s just three games for a player at the top of the lineup – he’s still tied for 24th. If this were 30 or 40 years ago, when batting average was still the be-all, end-all, we really would have considered this one of the greatest postseason performances of all time.





Davy Andrews is a Brooklyn-based musician and a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @davyandrewsdavy.bsky.social.

43 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
CJMember since 2020
9 months ago

I’ve basically stopped watching Yankees since they got Stanton when they already had Judge. At this point it is clear (to me at least) even Boone is not the biggest problem for the Yankees. Cashman is. While they have been clearly more successful, Yankees GM has seemed almost as clueless as a certain NY football team(!) in how to construct a balanced roster, let alone a championship one.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  CJ

Do you think it was Cashman’s choice to cut payroll after making the World Series?

Or after losing Game 7 against the Astros?

There’s no GM who can fix this ownership.

Last edited 9 months ago by Cool Lester Smooth
JimmyMember since 2019
9 months ago

I’m always happy for teams to use every possible dollar from their billionaire owners, but it seems disingenuous to me to act like the team with the 3rd highest payroll in the sport is being kneecapped by budgetary restrictions. Being the GM for the Yankees is hardly a hopeless predicament.

sandwiches4everMember since 2019
9 months ago
Reply to  CJ

 how to construct a balanced roster, let alone a championship one

What does this even mean? What is a “balanced” roster? I’m not even trying to be facetious, I literally am trying to understand what that means in context here, especially with the (what appears to be a) random Jets slam in there.

I have had many, many problems with Cashman’s decision making. His track record of late is mixed — he’s had some notable hits and some wild misses. Being upset that they went out and got a good player when they already had a good player is…a weird hangup.

Was the 2025 Yankee roster perfect? No, not even close. Was it capable of winning a WS? I think so. Of course, they didn’t, but this wasn’t like 2022, where they were running on fumes and really didn’t have much business being there.

There usually isn’t some easy-to-diagnose fatal flaw. There isn’t some defect of personality or grit or whatever.

Sometimes, the other team plays better and you get beat. The Yankees’ two All-Star SPs threw two of their worst performances in back-to-back games (and they even managed to steal one of those back!).

That’s not to say that isn’t worth evaluating what went wrong and what could have been better — you should always do that, even when you win. But I also think that it makes sense to come at this with a mindset that recognizes the inherent variation of baseball — it is impossible to build a fool-proof roster, and to think that you can do so is folly.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago

I was wondering this too. Maybe you can fault the Yankees for not figuring out what they needed before the season started, and as a result they had to do a wild-card game instead of having a bye.

Aside from that, the team that went into the playoffs had three credible playoff starters, a top 3 offense (potentially best), a credible defense in both in the infield and outfield, and a lights out closer. They were a little on the left-handed side but against the Blue Jays that’s a good thing since their best starters are righties.

Really the only thing they could have done was win *one more game* during the regular season. The Blue Jays were fresh and the Yankees were not.

drewsylvaniaMember since 2019
9 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Oddly the pen was terrible apart from Bednar.

jillingsMember since 2020
9 months ago

The following argument against the Yankees may not be right, but it is an honest attempts to understand the NYY. It came from Jomboy:

The only home grown hitter who worked out as a Yankee was Judge, who did not follow Yankee the player dev programme and got his own coaching Sanches, Volpe, Bird, Torres …we could go on… did not turn out. Why not? Maybe it is chance, but Yankee player dev hasn’t been good lately.

This, 100%, is on Cashman

Last edited 9 months ago by jillings
Jon
9 months ago
Reply to  CJ

Or maybe the postseason is just a crapshoot, at least to a much larger degree than the regular season is (where luck also plays a big role)?

If Austin Wells’ bases-loaded flyout was a fraction of an inch more on the sweet spot, we’d be talking about how great the Yankees are. Does that fraction of an inch suddenly make Cashman and Boone bad as opposed to good? It sounds ridiculous, doesn’t it? This was a team that nearly led all of MLB in run differential, had the best offense in the majors, and weathered the loss of about 10 WAR worth of starting pitching. They were certainly flawed, but (this year especially) all teams are.

The games are won by the players and they have to perform – in that sense the posteason is certainly measuring *something*, if not true team quality – but trying to pretend like a few millimeters (or any equivalent high leverage play that could have gone either way) makes the difference between *anyone* being “good” vs. “bad” is silly.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
9 months ago
Reply to  CJ

(notes that the Yankees were in WS last year, back in postseason again this year, then remembers northeastern sports fans are…special)

It is indeed clear that you haven’t been watching

Last edited 9 months ago by Smiling Politely
compucles
9 months ago
Reply to  CJ

I think any GM who can lead a team to 28 consecutive winning seasons and counting knows something about creating balanced rosters.

drewsylvaniaMember since 2019
9 months ago
Reply to  CJ

The amusement value of Yankee fans whining never gets old.

Dag Gummit
9 months ago
Reply to  CJ

While they have been clearly more successful, Yankees GM has seemed… clueless”
_____

So… you’re saying that their success is not indication of the GM?

I Like Big BuxtonMember since 2024
9 months ago

Are you SURE that green dot isn’t 2002 Barry Bonds (74 PAs, 259 wRC+)?

boomstickMember since 2024
9 months ago

Gerrit Cole was greatly missed

wheelhouseMember since 2022
9 months ago

Vlad Jr. was far superior in this series alone. What are we doing here?

Ostensibly RidiculousMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  wheelhouse

For real.

His 324 wRC+ in 20 PA definitely qualifies in the discussion above.
And unlike Judge he gets to keep going. Excited to see if he can continue it.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
9 months ago
Reply to  wheelhouse

Judge has been better for longer, but Vlad had a .700/.667/.900 line going for awhile in this series, which is pretty hilarious

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  wheelhouse

I think that retrospective will come when his postseason is done.

Vlad Jr is also incredible against left handed pitching.

Willians Astu-stu-studilloMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  wheelhouse

Vladdy: .529/.550/.1.059
Judge: .600.684/.933

It seems pretty obvious to me that what we’re doing is talking about the best hitter in the DS. Come on, at least double-check the stats before doing one of these.

Ostensibly RidiculousMember since 2020
9 months ago

The postseason is all about small sample size, story telling, and end results.
So if we’re talking about the greatest postseason performances of all time, I think the discussion should center around WPA. Or at least RE24.

Judge is currently leading this postseason in both.
(actually tied with Blake Snell at the moment in WPA)

But since it’s cumulative and better performance often means fewer games a WPA/Game or RE24/Game stat with a qualifying minimal number of games played would be best.

I’d love to see similar charts with these stats!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago

I think RE24 and WRAA are the better options for this than rate stats for this reason. It accounts for the concerns about sample size well.

By RE24, the best from 1962 to the present is Paul Molitor in 1993. He slashed a totally crazy .447 / .527 / .851 over 55 PAs. 17 runs and 13 RBIs in only 12 games. This is especially crazy because RE24 rewards players extra hitting with runners on base but not for being the extra runner on base, but he scored more runs than he has RBIs.

For similar reasons I have to give a shoutout to Rickey Henderson in 1989. He is only 6th but he slashed .448 / .568 / .941 over 44 PAs. He also had more runs than RBIs (12 to 8) also doesn’t account for his 11 stolen bases

wRAA is more expected with 2002 Barry Bonds, 2020 Randy Arozarena, 2004 Carlos Beltran, 2011 David Freese, and 2004 Albert Pujols.

NATS FanMember since 2018
9 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Freeze was a postseason freak.

fanofthemanMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

In 2011 alone he put up more playoff highlights than some teams have in the whole wildcard era

David Klein
9 months ago

Will Clark was ridiculously underrated and the fact that it took Alan Trammel so long to get into the hof was a joke. Oh yeah and get Whitaker into the hof already!

booondMember since 2019
9 months ago

If you use career and 30 PAs as the velvet rope, Colby Rasmus is the greatest playoff hitter of all time. Judge is good but not memorable.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
9 months ago
Reply to  booond

For a timely hook, if you use 20 PA as the cutoff, Jackson Chourio is currently fourth all-time with a 278 wRC+. First is the immortal Lloyd McClendon with a 345. (Rasmus is second, Dane Iorg third at 287.)

On the individual-season graph, McClendon’s 1992 is in that cluster of three dots at 400 wRC+ 16/17 PA. The other two are 1928 Gehrig and Ruth. Rasmus’s 2015 is in the next three dots above the spray, with 2015 Jorge Soler and 1996 Juan Gonzalez.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
9 months ago

Speaking of outlier dots, the one farthest along the bottom of the discreetly compressed negative region seems to be 2021 Brandon Lowe, who went 0-for-18 for the Rays. 1972 Aurelio Rodriguez is also credited with a -100 wRC+ in 18 PAs but he drew two walks… ah! both intentional. I assume he batted eighth. Anyway, asterisk for him.

Daniel GreenMember since 2020
9 months ago

That’s one vote for Judge having had a great postseason, and everyone else who watched, heard or read about the playoffs’ vote for no. Join us. 🙂

ichiro262Member since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  Daniel Green

I LOVE this take. Yankees fans are so amusing. I read another article that said after the wild card series that even though he got a lot of hits, “his legendary power basically disappeared”. His power disappeared because he went THREE games without a homer. Pure entertainment.

matthayden4Member since 2024
9 months ago

Regardless where one places Judge’s performance this year historically – Davy did a great job putting it into a variety of contexts – I think it went a long way in helping him shed the ‘choker’ label people were attaching to him last year with his dismal playoff performance.

Last edited 9 months ago by matthayden4
sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 months ago
Reply to  matthayden4

Yeah this is what I take away from it. These people who were so confident that Judge didn’t show up in the playoffs were wrong then and this helps to prove it.

JCCfromDCMember since 2016
9 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

You may not be allowing for the power of a narrative, facts be damned.

Left of Centerfield
9 months ago

It’s interesting to see Judge and Stanton on the list next to one another because they produced similar results in very different ways.

They both had 31 PAs across 7 games.

Judge: 13 hits, 2 doubles, 1 home run, 4 walks, 1HBP
Stanton: 8 hits, 1 double, 6 home runs, 3 walks, 1 GIDP.

7 of Stanton’s 8 hits were for extra bases whereas only 3 of Judge’s 13 hits were for extra bases. Judge ended up on 1st base 15 times vs 4 times for Stanton.

Even though wRC+ says they’re the same, I’d probably take Stanton’s performance (i.e, the 5 extra home runs) given how hard it can be to score runs in the postseason.

hopbittersMember since 2020
9 months ago

If they could put those both into the same postseason, they just might be onto something.

SucramRenrutMember since 2017
9 months ago

Looks like Vladdy is at 324 after 20 ABs so far. He could make an appearance on that leaderboard soon.

Paul-SF
9 months ago

No doubt Judge is an all-time great hitter, but the timing and framing of this seem … weird to me. Like, yes, 14th is technically “one of the best of all time,” but if someone is using that phrase in this context, I’m thinking top 10 performance in a more substantial sample size than 30 PA, and a World Series appearance at minimum. And as someone else noted, it’s very possible that he won’t even end up with the best postseason performance of this postseason, which seems like an important caveat.

norisk
9 months ago
Reply to  Paul-SF

Judge doesn’t control how many PAs he gets or how many games he plays, but he did amazing in the sample size he was in. I think the 30 PAs is just to exclude people who only played in one series while keeping a round number (5 game division series eclipses 20 PA easily).

Jason BMember since 2017
9 months ago

As you’d expect, the trendline goes from the bottom left to the bottom right.

Bottom left to top right?

TKDCMember since 2016
9 months ago

Is the guy that for reasons reasons thinks Raleigh is using roids but Judge isn’t* here?

*mlb players use PED; pretending you know who does and who doesn’t is stupid.

Yer Main GuyMember since 2024
9 months ago
Reply to  TKDC

Nope looks like you’re the only a*hole bringing that up.

jillingsMember since 2020
9 months ago

I get it, Judge is amazing and he played great. But what a case of missing the point: clearly the player to compare to Ruth and Jackson and Brett is none other than Ernie Clement 😉

mstacey9
9 months ago

Aaron judge write up – wet fart