Aaron Judge Bypasses Yankees’ Extension Offer

© Nathan Ray Seebeck-USA TODAY Sports

The Yankees and Aaron Judge found a way to bring extra drama to Opening Day. Even with an additional 24 hours of negotiations due to the postponement of their season opener against the Red Sox, the team did not reach an agreement on a contract extension with the slugger in time to meet his self-imposed deadline. Judge, who turns 30 on April 26, had said that once the 2022 season opened, all negotiations would cease, and he maintained that stance on Friday morning amid a flurry of reports detailing the Yankees’ offer, telling the assembled media, “First pitch is at 1:08 pm.”

His status did not change, and so on Friday night Judge told The Athletic’s Lindsey Adler, “At the end of the year, I’ll be a free agent. I’ll get to talk to 30 teams. The Yankees will be one of those 30.”

“I’m just disappointed because I think I’ve been vocal about — I want to be a Yankee for life, and bring a championship back to New York,” Judge told reporters after Friday’s 6-5 win. “I want to do it for the fans here. This is home for me, and not getting it done right now stings, but I’ve got a job to do on the field and I’ve got to shift my focus to that now and go play some ball.”

In a break from the way that the Yankees normally do business, general manager Brian Cashman laid out the offer to Judge “for transparency purposes” rather than rely on leaks to the media that he would have to confirm. According to Cashman, the team offered Judge seven years at $30.5 million per year, plus $17 million for this year, his final one before free agency, for a total package of $230.5 million.

“We were unsuccessful in concluding a multiyear pact,” Cashman told reporters before the team’s opener. “Obviously, our intent is to have Aaron Judge stay as a New York Yankee as we move forward, and I know that is his intent as well, which is a good thing. We’re going to be entering those efforts in a new arena, which would be at the end of the season when free agency starts, and maybe that will determine what the real market value would be, because we certainly couldn’t agree at this stage on a contract extension.”

Had Judge accepted, his contract would have carried the highest average annual value for any position player in franchise history at $28.8 million, surpassing the $27.5 million AAV from Alex Rodriguez‘s second 10-year deal. Among outfielders, the $30.5 million AAV for his free agent years would have surpassed the Dodgers’ Mookie Betts‘ $34.17 million and trailed only the Angels’ Mike Trout’s $35.54 million.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Judge played his side of negotiations close to the vest, and so it’s unclear what kind of terms he was seeking. The New York Post‘s Jon Heyman reported both that his camp “countered the Yankees’ offer at nine or 10 years at $36M a year for up to $360M” — Trout money, in other words — but also that “Someone close to Judge denied that [figure].” The Athletic‘s Ken Rosenthal reported that Judge asked for eight years with an average annual value “in the range of” $36 million. Eight times 36 equals $288 million; throw in this year’s as-yet-undetermined salary (the Yankees filed for arbitration at $17 million, he filed at $22 million) and you’ve got a contract well over $300 million, something in the ballpark of Gerrit Cole’s nine-year, $324 million deal.

Even in free agency, it’s difficult to imagine Judge approaching that annual salary for that length of time given his age and an industry-wide skittishness towards long-term deals for players over 30. Towards that end, here’s a quick look at the 18 position player contracts worth at least $200 million, 14 of which are still in effect. Only six of those 18 began when a player was in his age-30 season or later, and of those six, only one took effect after the 2016 season — and it happens to be the shortest one of the bunch:

Position Player Contracts of $200 Million or More
Rk Player Total Yrs Span AAV Age
1 Mike Trout $426.5 12 2019-30 $35.54 27
2 Mookie Betts $365.0 12 2021-32 $30.42 28
3 Francisco Lindor $341.0 10 2022-31 $34.10 28
4 Fernando Tatis Jr. $340.0 14 2021-34 $24.29 22
5 Bryce Harper $330.0 13 2019-31 $25.38 26
6 Giancarlo Stanton $325.0 13 2015-27 $25.00 25
7 Corey Seager $325.0 10 2022-31 $32.50 28
9 Manny Machado $300.0 10 2019-28 $30.00 26
10 Alex Rodriguez $275.0 10 2008-17 $27.50 32
11 Nolan Arenado $260.0 8 2019-26 $32.50 28
12 Alex Rodriguez $252.0 10 2001-10 $25.20 25
13 Miguel Cabrera $248.0 8 2016-23 $31.00 33
14 Anthony Rendon $245.0 7 2020-26 $35.00 30
15T Albert Pujols $240.0 10 2012-21 $24.00 32
15T Robinson Canó $240.0 10 2014-23 $24.00 31
17 Joey Votto $225.0 10 2014-23 $22.50 30
18 Christian Yelich $215.0 9 2020-28 $23.89 28
19 Prince Fielder $214.0 9 2012-20 $23.78 28
SOURCE: Cot’s Contracts
Age = seasonal age as of June 30 in first year of contract.

Regarding those contacts for players in their 30s, they don’t make ’em like that anymore, because they have not aged well. Pujols, Cabrera, and even Votto plummeted to replacement level by the middle of their deals or sooner, with the Reds’ first baseman the only one who managed to rebound, while Rodriguez and Canó were not the same players after their PED suspensions (the former missed all of 2014, the latter is returning from a full-year suspension after missing half of ’18 due to a previous suspension). The jury is still out on Rendon, who after a strong start during the pandemic-shortened 2020 season was limited to 58 games and 0.7 WAR last year. But by and large, this group is a scared straight advertisement for general managers considering handing out $200 million deals to aging stars.

Judge is an impressive player, with otherworldly power and bat speed. The 6-foot-7 behemoth hits the ball harder than just about anyone in the game, and the numbers back it up: his 95.8 mph average exit velocity and 57.9% hard-hit rate last year led baseball while his 17.9% barrel rate was good for the 96th percentile. He pummeled the ball at a .287/.373/.544 clip, ranking third in the American League in both slugging percentage and wRC+ (148), fifth in WAR (5.5) and tied for fifth in homers (39).

Across the 2017-21 span, Judge’s .391 OBP ranked eighth in the majors, his 154 homers fifth, his .563 SLG and 24.5 WAR both fourth, and his 154 wRC+ third. He did all that while playing in just 545 games; on a prorated basis, only Trout has been more valuable, with Betts right alongside him, and José Ramírez and Rendon not far off the pace:

WAR per 650 Plate Appearances, 2017-21
Player PA wRC+ WAR WAR/650
Mike Trout 2102 180 29.6 9.2
Aaron Judge 2370 154 24.5 6.7
Mookie Betts 2828 139 29.2 6.7
José Ramírez 2775 139 28.0 6.6
Anthony Rendon 2329 141 23.3 6.5
Ronald Acuña Jr. 1764 140 15.8 5.8
Juan Soto 2003 156 17.7 5.7
Yasmani Grandal 2201 124 19.4 5.7
J.T. Realmuto 2435 113 21.1 5.6
Alex Bregman 2601 143 22.4 5.6
Matt Chapman 2386 120 20.2 5.5
Christian Yelich 2648 138 22.3 5.5
Xander Bogaerts 2741 125 22.0 5.2
Justin Turner 2305 139 18.2 5.1
Nolan Arenado 2869 123 22.6 5.1
Jose Altuve 2697 136 21.2 5.1
Trea Turner 2661 122 20.8 5.1
Francisco Lindor 2912 117 22.6 5.0
Bryce Harper 2712 145 21.0 5.0
Carlos Correa 2131 128 16.5 5.0

Within the top tier of that group, the players worth at least six wins per 650 PA, Judge will be the oldest when he starts banking his big checks; as noted from the previous table, Rendon was entering his age-30 season when he hit pay dirt, while the others are in their 20s, including Ramírez, who finally got his due last week, albeit after a very below-market deal relative to his skills.

You don’t need me to tell you that age is everything when it comes to projections, but I will just the same. Here’s a look at Judge’s ZiPS projection, furnished by Dan Szymborski:

ZiPS Projection – Aaron Judge
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SB OPS+ DR WAR
2022 .276 .369 .538 496 85 137 22 0 36 95 71 5 144 9 5.1
2023 .273 .366 .531 469 80 128 22 0 33 89 68 4 141 9 4.6
2024 .269 .361 .514 453 75 122 21 0 30 83 64 4 136 9 4.1
2025 .265 .356 .491 430 67 114 19 0 26 73 59 4 128 8 3.5
2026 .257 .343 .461 408 59 105 17 0 22 64 52 3 117 7 2.6
2027 .253 .333 .424 384 52 97 15 0 17 54 45 3 106 7 1.8
2028 .246 .321 .401 357 44 88 13 0 14 45 37 2 96 6 1.2
2029 .239 .306 .366 284 32 68 9 0 9 32 26 2 83 4 0.3

That’s a reasonably strong projection for the first few years, but ZiPS expects Judge to tail off by his mid-30s, and to be a below-average player over the final two years of his deal. At full value, if 2022 weren’t his final year before free agency, ZiPS would suggest an eight-year, $184 million contract, but with the arbitration-year discount for what projects to be his most productive season, that drops to eight years and $167.5 million — about $63 million short of what the Yankees were offering based on Adler’s report. Presumably, the Yankees view that gap — which may be narrower, if their internal projections value him more highly than ZiPS — as representing some face-of-the-franchise premium that can be made up on the marketing and merchandising side.

All of which is to say that Judge bypassed a very generous offer, likely because he believes there will be an even more generous one on the other side, whether it comes from the Yankees or another team. While it was rather self-serving of the Yankees to announce the terms of the deal he rejected, this doesn’t appear to be a case along the lines of when the Nationals let it be known that they had offered Bryce Harper $300 million… but with roughly $100 million of that deferred, possibly knocking over $50 million off the present-day value. Via Rosenthal, the Yankees’ offer did not include any deferred money.

It’s worth keeping in mind that Judge’s ZiPS projection accounts for his shaky availability. From 2017-21, he played in just 77% of the Yankees’ games; last year’s 148 was his highest total since he played 155 in 2017. In the three seasons in between, he played just 242 total games: 112 in 2018, when he missed about seven weeks due a chip fracture in his right wist; 102 in ’19, when he missed two months due to an oblique strain; and 28 in ’20, when he missed a month due to a recurrent right calf strain.

Speaking of shaky availability, Judge’s only trip to the injured list last year came when he contracted COVID-19, which raises an uncomfortable point: he has deflected all questioning about his vaccination status, raising the possibility that he could miss the Yankees’ nine games in Toronto so long as the Canadian government bars the entry of unvaccinated players. Judge’s status for the team’s May 2-4 visit will be a reckoning on that subject.

That issue aside, one could backfill a good chunk of Judge’s missing time and probably create a projection that lands in the ballpark of the Yankees’ reported offer, as a player not just with an 8.3-WAR rookie season but a couple of seasons worth around seven wins to date, one who legitimately projects in the $30-million-a-year range over the course of a long-term deal. Still, I’m not sure how you get from there to Trout territory, not at Judge’s age. As Dan relayed to me, if Judge were three years younger, playing his age-27 season this year on an arbitration-year discount, ZiPS would suggest eight years at $253 million, while if he were five years younger, ZiPS would suggest eight years at $293 million, $36.6 million per year.

All of this is before really getting into the other wild card when it comes to Judge: the effect of his size on his aging pattern. In all of baseball history, only seven position players listed at 6-foot-6 or taller have produced even 1.0 WAR from age 30 onward:

Towering Sluggers in their 30s
Player Age Years G PA wRC+ WAR
Dave Winfield 30-43 1982-1995 1751 7406 126 28.1
Frank Howard 30-36 1967-1973 976 3908 151 23.4
Dave Kingman 30-37 1979-1986 1024 4044 111 7.2
Richie Sexson 30-33 2005-2008 531 2137 114 3.8
Giancarlo Stanton 30-32 2020-2022 164 681 139 3.2
Adam Dunn 30-34 2010-2014 711 2911 109 3.0
Darryl Strawberry 30-37 1992-1999 335 1189 110 1.8
Listed at 6-foot-6 or greater.

All of these guys continued to hit into their 30s, but defense was another story; their values were significantly suppressed by their gloves, and if they were DHing — something Howard only got to do in his final season — by that point they didn’t have much value in either direction. Judge has never won a Gold Glove but he did win a Fielding Bible Award this past year, and a Wilson Defensive Player of the Year award in 2019. Winfield, the lone Hall of Famer in the group, won seven Gold Gloves, but he was consistently in the red according to Total Zone, even when he brought home the hardware. Even if Judge is a more well-rounded player than those above, there just aren’t a lot of precedents for someone of his size aging gracefully in a baseball context.

While Cashman left the door open for Judge to reconsider the offer, it doesn’t sound as though that’s going to happen, though with his arbitration hearing not likely to occur until June, the lines of communication will probably remain open given that the Yankees generally avoid such proceedings. They haven’t taken a player to arbitration since Dellin Betances in 2017, and the GM said, “We don’t wind up in a hearing unless we are pushed into a hearing.” In the process of finding common ground for 2022, it’s not out of the question that the two sides find a bigger figure both can live with, though it seems unlikely.

So Judge is betting on himself to provide the Yankees and their competition a reason to up the ante. It’s a bold strategy that reflects the calm confidence the right fielder routinely projects. We’ll see if it pays off for him.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

50 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Jeff in JerseyMember since 2020
4 years ago

I am sure that Aaron Judge will be well-compensated, but as the article suggests, I think the Yankees made a reasonable offer.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Jeff in Jersey

It’s his right to play it out and go to free agency, but I don’t think he’s going to do better than that offer and he could certainly do worse.

tung_twista
4 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

If Judge hits his projection of 36HR OPS+144 war 5.1,
he will probably do better than $214M/7 years.

MLB payroll had been pretty stagnant for the past couple of years, but the last offseason showed a significant jump that is unlikely to reverse.

Rendon’s contract $245M/7 years is probably a good comp.
ZiPS projected 18.3 WAR for Rendon’s 2020-2026
and is projecting 18.1 WAR for Judge’s 2023-2029.

dl80Member since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

Rendon was 29 and 9 months when the season started after he signed. Judge will be 30 and 11 months.

bohknowsbmore
4 years ago
Reply to  dl80

Rendon also plays 3B and there’s more comfort with his ability to stick at the position long-term. Between age and his size, I think there’s a lot of justifiable worry that he’ll be a COF liability / DH only type for a substantial portion of the deal.

atlasMember since 2020
4 years ago

Think it’s a bit silly of Judge not to take this offer. He’s a great hitter, but he’s on the wrong side of 30 and teams are gun-shy these days about committing big money to guys later on. $230m is life-changing money and easily what he is worth, if not more. I’m guessing his annoyance is less about Trout and is probably is more in line with the fact Betts will be out-earning him by $120m, but Betts signed his contract at 27. Unfortunate but that’s how the timing worked, I suppose.

Travis LMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  atlas

I think the most likely outcome is that Judge takes this offer in the offseason after talking with other teams. The Yanks could pull it back, or Judge could get hurt/be ineffective, but if he has a normal season it should still be there based on Cash’ words.

MikeD
4 years ago
Reply to  Travis L

There is the possibility that they come to an agreement heading into the arbitration hearing in June. They have to talk contract at that point, so nothing would prevent them from still talking about the longer-term deal.

BreadbakerMember since 2022
4 years ago
Reply to  Travis L

I understand he has an insurance policy covering injury, but the amount and terms I don’t know.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

You want a guy who I would not want to give a huge second contract to? Aaron Judge. I think he’s going to be (at minimum) a decent hitter whenever he’s healthy. But a 6″7, 280 pound guy who has already had trouble staying healthy and who turns 30 in a month is not who I want to invest money in. No sir, no way. His knees are going to be jelly. There’s a decent chance that he hits well enough to hang on as a designated hitter for a while, but the most successful outcomes look something like Stanton’s 2021 or Adam Dunn’s 2010. I don’t want to ponder the less successful ones.

I thought the Marlins’ deal with Stanton was fair at the time, but I’d like to think I’ve learned something since then. And Stanton was something like 5 years younger.

Lou BrownMember since 2017
4 years ago

When we are talking about stupid amounts of money in all scenarios, it’s quite possible that Judge just wants to get out of NY and grow a beard.

FrancoeursteinMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Lou Brown

Something tells me he would look terrible with a beard lol.

proiste
4 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

He doesn’t shave in the offseason and it looks pretty good

carterMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Lou Brown

I wonder if this is it, truly. Maybe he just does not want to play for the Yankees and wants to go to the west coast.

gottaIch116Member since 2020
4 years ago

I’m inclined to think that the Yankees offered Judge an incredibly generous contract that Jay outlined well in this article.

However, I catch myself wondering whether revenue will go up with the expanded playoffs and we might see a sizable bump in spending amongst teams. So next offseason might be the best time to test the free agent market even if Judge doesn’t meet his projections for this year. For someone who knows more about mlb finances than me, is this possible?

dl80Member since 2020
4 years ago

Of those contracts listed, other than the ones that just started, the only ones that the team never regretted (so far):

Trout
Betts (?)
Machado
Harper

Tim Mainella
4 years ago
Reply to  dl80

I’d add Votto, but yeah. That list is wild. It also makes me reconsider my stance on Devers/Bogaerts, as a Sox fan.

adrock75Member since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  Tim Mainella

Honestly, what else are they going to spend their money on?

Is pitching a better investment?

Would you like them to pay Judge?

Are you going to see any personal savings if they run a lower payroll? Are you an investor in FSG?

MLB teams, notwithstanding the pandemic, are and will be rolling in dough–if the Jays don’t slightly overpay at least several of Bichette, Guerrero, and Lourdes, or bring in equivalent talent if/when elite ability isn’t available from the farm, then I will be furious.

On the bright side, at least Vlad and Bo will FAs at a young enough age to mitigate age-related decline risks. But elite talent should receive elite pay. And the Red Sox (unlike the Rays or Pirates or A’s) have absolutely zero excuse.

proiste
4 years ago
Reply to  adrock75

To be fair the Rays, Pirates, and A’s also have zero excuse

dl80Member since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  adrock75

As a fan, I would much rather them offer fair value extensions to their home grown players (not like the Albies deal).

bohknowsbmore
4 years ago
Reply to  adrock75

Are you going to see any personal savings if they run a lower payroll? Are you an investor in FSG?”

To this charge that fans are siding with ownership over players, I don’t think that’s correct. I think fans are siding with GMs, if anyone, who their interests are most closely aligned.

Even the most well-off teams have limited resources at some point. There are in fact opportunity costs associated with poor $$$ allocation to individual players.

JoeyVottoIsGoneMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Tim Mainella

Indeed.

Chip LockeMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  dl80

I guess trading them mid-contract would technically count as regret, but the first ARod contract and Arenado were/are fair deals for the teams that offered the terms, and both teams definitely lost the trade that dealt the star.

Pepper Martin
4 years ago
Reply to  dl80

The Angels have plenty of time to regret that Trout deal, with the way his injuries have been piling up.

But I think the team that made out best on any of these deals was the Mariners, despite never making the playoffs with Cano. Paid him for 5 years; got 20.7 fWAR; traded him for useful prospects.

Dmjn53
4 years ago
Reply to  Pepper Martin

yea but Trout’s likely to put up 4 win seasons even if he misses half the games

bohknowsbmore
4 years ago
Reply to  Pepper Martin

I don’t think one can count the Mariners deal as good just because the Mets bailed them out of it.

FreshOJMember since 2021
4 years ago

I hope this works out for Judge. The yankees don’t need reasons to not spend money after passing on Realmuto, Correa, and other top tier FA that they could have used to plug holes the last few years.

MTfor42Member since 2025
4 years ago

I think Judge and his agents looked at next year’s free agent crop. Trea Turner, Mitch Haniger, Max Muncy (whose option will probably get picked up). I doubt the Yanks sign TT since they’re SO sure Volpe or Peraza will be their next short stop. Who else in outfield comes close to Judge? They won’t get Reynolds from Pirates without giving up a SS prospect and a boatload more. DJLM is getting $15mill without a position, so an infield move would be surprising. Yanks offer seems fair, and it’d be multi generational wealth for Judge and his family. Is another $30-40 million worth the gamble that he stays healthy and produces? He must think so.

Mike NMN
4 years ago

Without being sure of exactly what Judge was asking for, it’s hard to say what he might have agreed to, but it’s his risk to take. He’s a very very good player, weirdly both overrated and underrated at the same time, but gambling on himself by tossing aside an offer for $200M+ may be a low probability wager. He plays through this year, Yankees offer a QO, and then his market will get set, but a season of 120 games is going to cost possibly 10’s of millions over the full costs of the offers he sees.

si.or.noMember since 2017
4 years ago

Note for the editor: in the 6th paragraph Mookie’s contract should be $30.417M (currently $34.17M)

bohknowsbmore
4 years ago
Reply to  si.or.no

I had to reread that part multiple times as well before I realized there was a typo / error in there

GTOBalance
4 years ago

Even if Judge can do better by lets say $50m elsewhere in the offseason, you’d think most of that could and would be made up by better paying endorsement opportunities in NYC. And you could lock in $200m last week, not having to play another full season in a sport where hes hurt and missing games constantly.

The risk/reward here seems like he should have taken this deal

Jim ParksMember since 2019
4 years ago
Reply to  GTOBalance

Brutal taxes in NY probably cancel out some of the endorsement opportunities though.

Last edited 4 years ago by Jim Parks
rmgxt9
4 years ago
Reply to  Jim Parks

also, maybe he just wants to be able to choose where he plays for the first time in his life.

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  rmgxt9

Next thing you know he’ll be eating strawberries in Babe Ruth’s pants and streaking in a flesh-colored bodysuit

Pepper Martin
4 years ago
Reply to  Jim Parks

Taxes are high in New York than elsewhere but endorsement money in New York is ASTRONOMICALLY higher than elsewhere. Derek Jeter (who is really the best comp for Judge in terms of endorsement potential) made $150 million over the course of his career in endorsements. Aside from Shohei Ohtani (who gets, like, all the endorsements from Japan), the most any major leaguer makes in endorsements is Bryce Harper at $4.5 million. If Judge wanted to make $10 million a year in endorsements in NY, it’s there for the taking.

sogoodlooking
4 years ago

Ah, the self-delusion of those who don’t actually labor for a living.

Judge sounds like someone who let his feelings be hurt by negotiations. It’ll be interesting to see what he settles for after playing 95 games with average defense, and 1/3 of those games at DH in 2022.

Last edited 4 years ago by sogoodlooking
Dmjn53
4 years ago
Reply to  sogoodlooking

there’s a lot wrong here, but I’ll focus on just one part. Judge grades out as an absolutely premium defensive RF

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  sogoodlooking

Ah, the self-delusion of those who don’t actually labor for a living.”

I have to ask…what does this even mean?

nktokyo
4 years ago

He’s going to be the wrong side of 30 and the Yankees aren’t that stupid anymore.

synco
4 years ago

$30m a year seems like an offer Judge should have taken.

williamnyy
4 years ago

The Yankees’ made a very fair offer (at this stage of the game), but Judge also has good reason to believe he can get a better deal. Assuming he can tolerate the risk (which is twofold: injury and having to leave the Yankees, and perhaps the latter really isn’t a concern), Judge is all but assured he will at least get the same extension portion of the Yankees’ offer (7/$213.5mn), while still allowing for his higher requested 2022 salary of $22mn.

If Judge stays healthy, the Yankees will be compelled to “begin” negotiations at 7/$213.5mn because nothing would have changed (i.e., concern about Judge’s age/durability would already be factored into the offer). In fact, they might have to up the ante at the onset to account for the fact that they’d no longer be making the commitment with one year of (much cheaper) team control left. Then, when you factor in the likelihood that at least one other team (e.g., Mets, hometown LA team) will be interested in his services, it’s easy to see how Judge gets closer to his 8 years/$288mn.

The Yankees are the party that faces the greater risk (assuming they do care about winning more than other teams, and not just at a level needed to sustain the business model, which is debatable) because if Judge gets injured, they lose a top performing player. And, if he doesn’t, and they refuse to pay the market premium, they lose a top performing player. When you consider Judge’s marketability and the team’s relative lack of star power (Stanton and Cole being the only other big names on the team), it’s not hard to see the Yankees’ hand being forced this winter. In a funny way, Judge probably has a better chance of cashing in with an inflated deal because of the Yankees’ recent unwillingness to invest in payroll at a level commensurate with their resources.

dl80Member since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  williamnyy

Unless Judge continues to get hurt or takes a step back offensively or defensively.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  williamnyy

This isn’t exactly like the greater fool theory, but it’s kind of in the same family of theories. This theory takes for granted that there is a team out there that is willing to give a $250M or $260M contract to a 6″7, 280 pound guy going into his age-31 season with a fairly notable injury history. I’m not totally sure about whether a team will bid more than what the Yankees did. It is possible. But I certainly wouldn’t want my team to do it. And I say this as a person who thinks Judge could very well put up an MVP-level season this year.

The theory also takes for granted that Judge won’t get hurt. Which is also possible. But far from a given. The question of taking the sure money always revolves around the downside of injury in the walk year. Judge, on average, will do better not taking the extension and going to free agency, because it is rare that he’ll have an injury so severe it will cost him more than about $30M-$40M. But it also protects against catastrophe. For a player, having a deal that protects against catastrophe can be important since you only have one year.

dl80Member since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Exactly. His 90th percentile outcome might be getting an additional $30m, but his 10th percentile is losing $100m (torn ACL, etc.) and his 30th is losing $30m.

The numbers are not in his favor, I don’t think.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  dl80

This is mostly where I land. I’d say his median is probably $20M higher, and his 90th is probably closer to $45M. But, yeah, his 10th percentile is super, super bad. It’s the same principle as insurance for a lot of bad stuff. Most of us will be better off not paying that premium every month but for those people who get screwed by their house catching on fire they’re very happy they did. Maximizing your outcome in the average of all possible universes is not always the best move because you only have one career.

MikeD
4 years ago

Judge is not Trout, but Trout signed his deal several years back, so Judge might also be looking to push MLB player salaries higher, especially coming off of a new CBA and multiple new TV contracts. The other aspect that he no doubt is considering is the additional money he makes the Yankees. They market him at every step, down to creating the Judge’s chambers at Yankee Stadium. They know he provides additional revenue beyond simply making them a better team. He wants a piece of the action.

There is an argument that Judge is worth $36M a year, but that argument is for the now. The odds of him being worth that much per year in three or four seasons seems low. That’s the challenge for the Yankees. They want him back, but they don’t want him back for his post age-35 seasons at that price. Look no further than Justin Upton. A fine player in his 20s. His last good season was when he was 30. No one has yet figured out aging patterns.

Last edited 4 years ago by MikeD
Willians Astu-stu-studilloMember since 2020
4 years ago

Judge’s “I want to be a Yankee for life” strikes me as particularly hollow. He wants to be a Yankee for life, but he won’t get the vaccine that was required to actually play in Yankee Stadium? And he won’t accept a pretty good extension? At what point does someone’s desire to do something go so low that it’s not worth mentioning anymore?

Last edited 4 years ago by Willians Astu-stu-studillo
BreadbakerMember since 2022
4 years ago

One thing that struck me was that the offer incorporated the Yankees’ lower offer for 2022. One wonders if they’d have offered Judge what he was asking for, or even split the difference, if that might have resulted in a different reaction to the offer. If I’m negotiating with someone and I want to get them to accept, it’s rare that asking them to eat crow on a position they’ve already taken succeeds. And the difference is chicken feed to the Yankees.

Momus
4 years ago

“…the $30.5 million AAV for his free agent years would have surpassed the Dodgers’ Mookie Betts‘ $34.17 million and trailed only the Angels’ Mike Trout’s $35.54 million”

…wait… what?

I’m guessing there’s a typo in one of these numbers