Aaron Sanchez Aced His Test

FanGraphs uses Slack in order to keep all the writers in communication, and it’s in there that we claim post topics so that we don’t accidentally overlap. A couple days ago, I made a soft commitment to write about Aaron Sanchez’s secondary stuff, regardless of how he actually did on Tuesday. The way I figured, one way or the other, it was going to be worth an article. Now, what I didn’t know was that the Rays/Blue Jays game would end with a very 2016 type of controversial call. That’s overshadowed everything else, and few care anymore about how Sanchez did in the earlier innings. But I’m here to fulfill my commitment. And, guess what: I’ve long been a Sanchez skeptic, as his being a starter is concerned, but he had a wonderful, wonderful outing, before the Jose Bautista slide. He made it very easy to be encouraged.

Let’s start simple and go from there. Sanchez lasted seven innings, allowing a run on five hits. He didn’t walk anyone, he didn’t hit anyone, and he recorded eight strikeouts. That’s an excellent line. You can forgive the one solo dinger.

Going to the next step, Sanchez picked up strikes on 64 of his 91 pitches. That works out to a rate of 70%. Last year, in his 11 big-league starts, Sanchez never finished with a strike rate over 64%. His overall average was a lousy 58%. It had also been around that low in Double-A and Triple-A. The game line implies that Sanchez was in control. A more granular examination supports it.

Sanchez’s release point? He basically maintained it, over seven innings.

And the velocity? According to Brooks Baseball, Sanchez’s average fastball velocity in each inning started with a 96. So he didn’t show signs of wearing down, after coming out too strong. He started with heat, and he finished with heat.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

We can get dorkier still. Ever so much dorkier. I want to show you a few plots, which include pitch speed and spin axis. Spin axis is a PITCHf/x measurement, and I gathered this data from Baseball Savant. You don’t need to really understand spin axis, per se — I just like this as a way to group Sanchez’s various pitches. It’ll probably make more sense after the images. Here’s Sanchez as a starter a year ago:

sanchez-2015

You see some errant pitches floating around the middle. That’s the curveball, toward the bottom left. Near the upper right, you see the fastball blob, and then poor differentiation between the fastball and the changeup. Here’s a similar plot of Sanchez’s results from Tuesday:

sanchez-2016

Look how well the pitches are (mostly) grouped. There’s one slider there in the middle, and then one weird “fast curveball” or something, but on this plot it’s easy to identify the fastballs, the changeups, and the curves. Each of them stand out, and beyond that, there’s not a lot of variation in the spin axes. It’s suggested that the pitches were thrown with pretty good consistency, or if you prefer, repeatability. I take this as a sign that Sanchez did a good job of repeating his deliveries, which might be the very most important part of pitching.

Earlier I said I was going to talk about the secondary stuff. Really, I’m just talking about Sanchez in general, but we can focus on the secondary stuff, too. That part’s important for him, and Sanchez has thrown curves, changeups, and sliders. I think we can agree on a general rule of thumb: Those are pitches you want to keep down. Especially if you throw a power sinker, like Sanchez. So, borrowing from Brooks, here’s where Sanchez threw his secondary stuff last year, as a starter:

sanchez-offspeed-2015

This is what he did with those pitches in the limited sample of Tuesday:

sanchez-offspeed-2016

It’s plain to see that fewer of these pitches were left up. Presumably, that’s a consequence of better repetition. A year ago, Sanchez threw 60% of these pitches in the lowest two-fifths of the plot shown. Yesterday, that’s where he put 21 of these 28 pitches. He didn’t fly open so much and miss up and arm-side. There was better control of the secondary stuff, therefore. And at the same time, Sanchez went from 43% fastballs in the zone to 56%. This can be easily simplified: Sanchez threw strikes with his heater, and that allowed him to throw non-strikes with his offspeed stuff.

The result: Sanchez got strikes in the zone, and he got strikes out of the zone. He didn’t get strikes out of the zone before. As a starter last year, Sanchez ran an O-Swing rate of 22%, and he topped out at 30%. Yesterday he finished at 41%, with 19 Rays swings at 46 would-be balls. When a pitcher can get strikes without throwing strikes, there’s no truer sign of being in command.

Tuesday, in his first start of 2016, Aaron Sanchez was legitimately in command. It builds on what seemed awful promising in spring training, and this is something that would’ve been difficult to imagine saying last summer. But it happened, over 91 pitches against a pretty good team, and even though most people just remember the game for its conclusion, what Sanchez showed could mean more to the Blue Jays than one unfortunate loss. It should go without saying that Sanchez needs to keep this up. Every wild pitcher has had un-wild days, and it’d be better to have five good starts than one. And Sanchez, for his part, did in fact miss with a few early curveballs. He needs to take these gains forward, in order to be a truly convincing starter. But already, Sanchez showed something he didn’t show much last year. Strikes have always been the question. Aaron Sanchez just threw strikes.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Huron
10 years ago

A positive article about Aaron Sanchez as a starter? That’s allowed on Fangraphs?

toronto1993
10 years ago
Reply to  Huron

Fangraphs praises players/teams when they have a reason to be praised, and criticizes players/teams when they have a reason to be criticized. Aaron Sanchez used to have a lot of reasons to be criticized, yesterday he had a lot of reasons to be praised.

London Yank
10 years ago
Reply to  toronto1993

Fangraphs also praises players/teams when they have no good reason to be praised, and criticizes players/teams when they have no good reason to be criticized. I am not sure the snark you are responding to is warranted, however no matter how good FanGraphs are, they are not perfect.

jrubyMember since 2026
10 years ago
Reply to  London Yank

So… What you’re saying is… We need more Twins articles?

radivel
10 years ago
Reply to  London Yank

No, no matter what, we don’t need more Twins articles.

Damaso
10 years ago

Something that got lost in his ugly peripherals line in his first 11 career starts last year at age 22 is that he drastically improved over those 11 starts, and was legit very good in the last 4 or so… then got injured, and came back 6 weeks later as a great reliever.

Now you can add this start to the improvememt seen last year. Here’s how his line now looks over the last 5 starts of his 12 start career:

5gs, 7.0ip/gs, 18.7k%, 6.0bb%, 58.0gb%, 2.31era, 4.28fip, 3.41xfip

And those 5 starts sandwich a dominant spring:

5gms, 20.0ip, 25.3k%, 4.0bb%, 57.7gb%, 1.35era, .550oops

The improvement is starting to look like it might be legit.

Damaso
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

heh – I even missed your line at the end “and it’d be better to have five good starts than one.” looks like 5 good starts might already be there. but better to have 30 than 5, I guess.

and another reason for encouragement, especially in terms of body control – he spent all winter working out with stroman and his specialists, and added a good 25lbs. And by looking at him, that 25lbs went straight to his butt I mean core.

Twitchy
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

He faced 2 of the worst lineups in the game, those 4 starts were significantly overrated.

Shirtless George Brett
10 years ago

I’m still sceptical. He was missing his location alot (sometimes quite badly) in the first half of his outing but got bailed out by Tampa swinging at everything. His change looked really good and his curve had its good moments and its bad but more then anything I still question his command.

HarryLives
10 years ago

Really? I watched that start, and it seemed to me that he was throwing a lot of strikes with his fastball. When you throw a 95 mph sinker, you don’t need pinpoint control. Tampa Bay was aggressive, but for the most part, they weren’t chasing pitches out of the strike zone.

ice_hawk10
10 years ago

yea he really was a revelation. he’s always given the impression of rawness – a young kid just trying to survive from pitch to pitch praying for strikes. he looked kinda like that early in the game yesterday, but then started pitching. we saw 3-2 curveballs for swinging strikeouts, we saw backdoor curveballs for taken strikes, we saw multiple whiffs on his hitherto unknown changeup, and we saw control, if not command even, of a 96mph running sinker. the only thing we didn’t see was the cutter/slider, which he spiked in the dirt twice, but with everything else working, who cares? very much looking forward to his next start.

does he remind anyone of Garrett Richards? that’s a name i keep coming back to. little ways to go to be recognized at that level, but the repertoire and the development story is somewhat similar.

Jason BMember since 2017
10 years ago

“It builds on what seemed awful promising in spring training”

Awfully promising, Cletus!