Adam Eaton Has Been Baseball’s Quietest Superstar
One problem you’ll hear with last year’s underachieving Chicago White Sox roster is that it was too heavy on the stars-and-scrubs model. Plenty of production came from guys like Chris Sale, Jose Quintana, and Jose Abreu. Very little production came from the rest of the infield, the back end of the rotation, and both corner-outfield spots.
But this year’s White Sox have improved — they’re currently tied for the best record in the American League. They improved during the offseason by adding guys like Todd Frazier, Brett Lawrie and Mat Latos to ensure that they’d have fewer black holes on the roster. Melky Cabrera and Avisail Garcia are each having bounceback seasons thus far, erasing two more holes from last year. Overall, there’s a more even talent of distribution around Chicago’s stars, and it’s a big part of this year’s success. Less scrubs is good. But so is more stars! And alongside the big guns, they’ve added another player who doesn’t yet have this type of reputation, but is making the case to be tossed into the “star” category. I’m talking about Adam Eaton, who, going back a whole year now, has quietly been one of baseball’s very best players.
We talk a lot about sample sizes, particularly this early in the season. What can we take away from small samples? When is a sample large enough to draw meaningful conclusions? Certainly not yet this year, but we’ve got a nice little feature here on the leaderboards in the “Past Calendar Year” split that helps with that. People are comfortable using full-season stats to evaluate players, and the Past Calendar Year split is just like an improved version of a full season’s stats, where the arbitrary endpoints are less arbitrary. It’s just “what have you done for me lately?” where “lately” is a full year, and everyone is on a similar playing-time scale.
I’ll often use this feature throughout the season to sort of help mentally readjust my perception of who the best players in baseball are “right now,” for whatever that’s worth. I went for a mental readjustment the other day, and something at the top of the leaderboard immediately caught my eye:
Position-player WAR, last calendar year
- Mike Trout, 9.5
- Bryce Harper, 8.5
- Josh Donaldson, 8.2
- Manny Machado, 8.1
- Yoenis Cespedes, 7.1
- Kris Bryant, 6.7
- Chris Davis, 6.4
- Adam Eaton, 6.3
- Paul Goldschmidt, 6.2
- Joey Votto, 6.2
You’ve got four guys who are viewed nearly unanimously as the four best in the world. You’ve got Cespedes, whose monster second half has carried over into 2016 You’ve got the reigning Rookie of the Year in Bryant, whose game has seemingly no holes, and you’ve got three of the most dangerous hitters in baseball in Davis, Goldschmidt and Votto. And then you’ve got Eaton, the 5-foot-8 outfielder, the entirety of whose “career highlights and awards” section of his Wikipedia page is “AL triples co-leader (2014)” and “Major League Baseball Defensive Player of the Month (April 2016).”
One of those things is not like the other, and yet there it is. Nothing is doctored about that leaderboard. According to the FanGraphs WAR model, Adam Eaton has been one of the 10 most valuable position players in baseball for the last 162 games. Your first thought is probably how the defensive metrics have loved Eaton in right field this year, and how that’s probably inflating his value. Except, the defensive metrics hated Eaton last year, in center, and Eaton agrees that he had a down year. The two almost entirely cancel each other out.
Eaton’s elite WAR over the last year has not been inflated by defensive metrics. No, he’s gone about achieving quiet superstar status the way some of his other elite peers have:

| Name | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | BB% | K% | HR | SB | ISO | wRC+ | BsR | Def | WAR | WAR/600 |
| Adam Eaton | 731 | .302 | .384 | .454 | 9% | 17% | 16 | 21 | .151 | 132 | 5.1 | 3.4 | 6.3 | 5.2 |
| A.J. Pollock | 532 | .322 | .374 | .524 | 8% | 12% | 17 | 33 | .203 | 140 | 6.6 | 6.9 | 5.8 | 6.5 |
| Lorenzo Cain | 606 | .295 | .351 | .461 | 7% | 18% | 18 | 27 | .166 | 123 | 3.7 | 14.7 | 5.8 | 5.7 |
| Mookie Betts | 673 | .300 | .344 | .489 | 6% | 13% | 19 | 24 | .189 | 123 | 8.8 | 0.3 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
Guys like Pollock, Cain and Betts are probably still underrated by the casual fan, but are more often viewed as all-around stars within the game. Whatever reputation those three have, Eaton’s earned the same.
He’s an average-to-plus defender in the outfield. He’s a definite plus on the basepaths. He hits at the top of the order and plays every day. But the most surprising thing about Eaton’s ascension is the area where he probably doesn’t get enough credit: he’s turned into a truly great hitter.
That transition has likely been masked by Eaton’s horrible start to last season, an April in which he hit .192/.241/.256. That April is now more than a year in the past, and since then, he’s ran a higher wRC+ than Bryant, Nolan Arenado and Matt Carpenter. He credits a different weightlifting program than the one he used in Arizona for added strength. In the second half of last year, he started pulling more balls in the air to tap into that newfound strength. This year, he’s cut his strikeout rate in half, and is one of just 12 batters to have walked more than he’s struck out. He talked in the spring about becoming a better situational hitter, with more contact. This year’s contact rate hasn’t changed from his career norms, but the strikeouts are way down. All of this suggests a change in swing, a change in approach, or both.
We can start with the swing. I went back about a calendar year, and grabbed a couple of heat maps. The samples are close to equal. This simply shows Eaton’s slugging percentage, broken down by zone, before May of last year, and then after May of last year:

Used to be that Eaton only did his damage on pitchers down the middle of the plate. Now, Eaton’s got a swing that can do damage on the outer-third of the plate, as well as the inner-third. Like any other hitter, he’ll still make you pay down the middle, too. Eaton used to have a very particular swing, with plenty of holes. It’s tough to find the hole in his swing nowadays.
There’s also the changed two-strike approach, which has helped cut down on the strikeouts. Before 2016, Eaton swung at 34% of non-two-strike pitches, and 64% of two-strike pitches. This year, the non-two-strike swing rate is similar, at 36%, but the two-strike swing rate is way up, at 74%. Eaton’s become more aggressive with two strikes, trying to put the ball in play, and he’s doing so with a swing that can now cover more of the plate.
Eaton hasn’t radically changed his game at the plate, he’s just improved across the board and turned himself from a good hitter to something better than that. Thanks to the well-rounded nature of his game, that improved bat’s been enough to put him in the conversation with baseball’s truly elite players going on a year now, and he only looks to be getting better. It’s been subtle, but it’s been real. Last year’s stars-and-scrubs White Sox ditched the scrubs, and may have quietly added another star.
August used to cover the Indians for MLB and ohio.com, but now he's here and thinks writing these in the third person is weird. So you can reach me on Twitter @AugustFG_ or e-mail at august.fagerstrom@fangraphs.com.
I traded Eaton away for Lindor in the offseason of my keeper league, who knew I might actually regret doing that.
Eaton is anything but quiet…
Adam Eaton loves Adam Laroche’s son, Drake. He thinks he is a good boy.
Drake is the leader of the team. Just ask Adam.
He loves the Drake?
I can think of a way quieter and arguably more valuable player, and an interesting way to dispute your distinction of what is “less arbitrary” in the sample size:
2015 + 2016 fWAR
AdamEaton: 6.0
Kevin Kiermaier: 6.3
Eaton the better offensive player, KK the better defensive player; we all know offensive value is “louder” than defensive value, barring sportscenter top 10 plays. Arguing against that is KK’s easily winning GG and platinum glove honors, and the fanfare that came with it. Yadayada, you can dispute the accuracy of defensive metrics but I think we’re past that here, and the awards are a nice recognition that he glides through the eye test.
OTOH, KK puts up a higher ISO with a lower BABIP. Another interesting dichotomy between the two players is Eaton hits leadoff and has a spray approach, whereas KK routinely bats 7-9 and is pull-happy; bottom of the order hitter getting less plate appearances but doing quite a bit with them.
This isn’t to criticize your article, I liked it. But seems like a good theme to discuss a great player on a small-market team putting up a likewise superstar-caliber performance. He wasn’t highly selected for in your leaderboard criteria because of a whopping nearly 200 less PA (and 11 less games), largely attributable to the lower batting order I mentioned given that they are both everyday players. So more or less arbitrary…I don’t know about that, especially considering more anecdotal performance explanations about time of year vs. performance.
Finally, possibly the strongest evidence of KK being the quietest superstar is that you didn’t even consider him in your much more arbitrarily defined “Other CF Stars” table. FWIW, KK’s WAR/600 would be 5.7, tied with Cain (another similar player with a better stick) and second only to Pollock. Just sayin’ 🙂
How is 200 less PA’s arbitrary? He has 200 less PA’s because he’s not a good hitter. Eaton might be the best leadoff hitter in baseball behind Jose Altuve.
I explained my interpretation of arbitrariness and PAs, and I’m confident that if you read the comment closely you’ll realize this. God bless.
I don’t know about 2nd best, but you said “might”, so it softens the argument.
This year Eaton is 6th among leadoff hitters in RC+ with 131 (42nd overall), behind Altuve 184, Fowler, Saunders 149, Herrera 146, and Carpenter 135.
He’s 8th in w/OBA among leadoff hitters with 364 (51st overall), behind Altuve 437, Fowler 417, Herrera 395, Saunders 388, Kinsler 379, Carpenter 377, and Segura 377.
Obviously SSS, but last year he was 48th overall in RC+ with 118, and 47th in wOBA with 346.
He’s had a great defensive year so far, but his offense has been overstated. He’s not even the best leadoff hitter in Chicago.
That being said, his 400 OB is huge on a team that has problems getting on base the last few years and his defense has been great as well. I’ll give you top 5 leadoff hitter 🙂
Fowler, Saunders, Herrera, Segura… please. His wRC+ is 131.
Kinsler has had a terrific start to the year but he’s aging.
I’d give you Carpenter and Altuve. He’s 13th in OBP. I’ll take that.
Fowler’s 5th in OB… In terms of offensive WAR, Fowler’s 4th. Eaton is 42nd… in terms of leadoff “hitter”… how many different stats does Fowler have to be better in?
Fowler is 30 years old and has never had a season close to how he has started this year. To expect him to continue on with his .415 BABIP and 160 wRC+ seems pretty unlikely given his career averages. Meanwhile, Eaton has improved each of the past couple of years, and is entering the prime of his career. Despite not playing his prime years yet, his wRC+ is higher than Fowlers, and his .400 OBP this year is much more sustainable than Fowler’s OBP given that it isn’t influenced mightily by an inflated BABIP; in fact, Eaton’s BABIP is below his career average.
If we’re going by career RC+, then Betts is another leadoff hitter who’s better than Eaton.
Well I know this Stoney… Eaton’s got the best #TWTW since Yaz…
I mean sure, if you only look at 6 weeks of data then I guess Travis Shaw is a better hitter than both Trout and Harper. But over the past calendar year the only leadoff hitter with a better wRC+ than Eaton is Altuve.
I betcha that Yaz didn’t even like Hawk… he probably spoke once to Hawk, and said something innocent like “get the fuck out the way”, and Hawk’s eyes got all sparkly and shit because the great Yaz talked to him.
@Beel;
Yes, but people would rather argue with me about a 6 week sample, or etc, than view the argument in it’s entirety.
Past calendar year:
Altuve – wRC+ 135, OBP .367, wOBA .368
Eaton – wRC+ 132, OBP .384, wOBA .365
Carpenter – wRC+ 130, OBP .363, wOBA .362
To say Eaton might be the best lead off hitter in baseball behind Altuve isn’t a brash statement. It’s not even far fetched. Statistically, that’s how it has played out the past calendar year. To argue guys like Saunders, Segura and Fowler is just arguing for arguments sake.
As for Mookie – wRC+ 123, OBP .344, wOBA .357
My first line: “I don’t know about 2nd best, but you said “might”, so it softens the argument.”
My last line “I’ll give you top 5 leadoff hitter :)”
I acknowledged it was small sample size (6 weeks) which is why I included what he did last year (his rankings among leadoff hitters and hitters overall this year are consistent with last year”…. “Obviously SSS, but last year he was 48th overall in RC+ with 118, and 47th in wOBA with 346.”
“his offense has been overstated” has been my main point
You brought up Fowler’s career #s as to why Eaton is better than Fowler… but then look at just the last calendar year when comparing Betts to Eaton, even though Betts’ career numbers are better. You can pick arbitrary dates to make your guy look better, but Fowler is the better player this year, and Betts was the better player last year.
All I’m saying is that he’s consistently ranked 6th, 7th, 8th among leadoff hitters both last year and this year even though the names have changed.
I think to say he’s the second best is a stretch, but you yourself said “might”… I think the stats back me up when I say “top 5″…
And I believe I have also said he has been exactly what the Sox have needed.
I guess I’m coming from the point listening to broadcasts Hawk is always trying to say so and so on the Sox is the best at _____… (since Yaz) I’m 40 and have lived in Chicago my entire life and overstating greatness has been a theme with that team as long as I can remember. And it filters down through the fans as well. You never hear “so and so is top 5”, it’s always “so and so is arguably the best”.
No one overstated anything.
I posted the stats over the past calendar year. The past full season of baseball, he has been the 2nd best. He hasn’t been any lower than that.
You can turn this into some absurd Hawk Harrelson argument if you’d like, but over the past calendar year those are the statistics.
And since both players have been in the league (2014) Eaton has been better than Betts. If, when discussing the best lead off hitter in baseball today we want to use Adam Eaton’s Arizona Diamondbacks numbers, when he wasn’t a leadoff hitter and was platooning as a young player, that doesn’t make much sense now, does it?
I didn’t pick an arbitrary start point or end point. I used the start and end point in which this article was about, and over the past calendar year (the basis of this article) Adam Eaton has been the 2nd best leadoff hitter in baseball. Glad I could clear that up.
You pointing to Fowler is an arbitrary, SSS cut off point that proves that this is somehow more of a Sox vs Cubs argument to you than a baseball argument.
Oh, and if we’re going to take the discussion that direction, over the past calendar year Adam Eaton has a higher wRC+ than Kris Bryant so to call his offense overstated seems a bit erroneous to me.
And know, I presented Fowlers career numbers as a reason for why his start this year is not sustainable or expected.
If we go by the past calendar year – once again the basis of the article – Fowler is not better than Eaton. Glad I could clear that all up.
This article has nothing to do about who’s the second best leadoff hitter. This article is saying over the last calender year Eaton has been the quietest superstar… that’s different. This is an argument separate from the article. Last year there were 6 or 7 leadoff hitters with better RC+ and wOBA. This year there are 5-6 leadoff hitters with better RC+ and wOBA.
But if we want to take parts of each season. Since the All Star Break last year, Fowler has been better… it’s not just the start of this season… over the last 10 months.
BTW, you could say over the last calendar year that Arrieta has been just as good or even slightly better than Kershaw… but you won’t hear me arguing that Arrieta is the best pitcher in baseball over Kershaw… whose entire career has been good as Koufax’s.
Anyway, you say second best, I say top 5… kind of a silly argument… Good luck with the season.
So the article, which is arguing he’s a top 10 player in the game over the past calendar year, somehow doesn’t also infer that he’s a top 2 leadoff hitter? Instead, you see it as him being top 5? Wow, leadoff must be really deep if he’s a top 10 player but barely a top 5 leadoff hitter.
“playing like” is a bit different than “is” If you truly believe that Eaton *IS* a top 10 player in all of baseball, than I can see why you think he’s the secondbest leadoff hitter. Perhaps I’m not as rational as you, but I can think of a lot more than 9 players that I’d prefer over Eaton and it has nothing to do with what team he plays for. Have a good day, sir. Thanks for the discussion 🙂
Also if you think that a) he isn’t a good hitter; and b) that he received less TWO HUNDRED less PAs because of that flawed first assumption…well, my friend, you may not be the Rational Fan you think you are.
In his last 182 games, he has a wRC+ of about 102. He’s a league average hitter, so no he isn’t a “good hitter.” He hits down in the order because he doesn’t get on base at a good clip and he doesn’t have much power.
I think the numbers speak for themselves so you’re completely wrong and I’ll just leave it at that.
What numbers? I just cited his low OBP and his average wRC+. What numbers state that KK is a good hitter?
He chose the calender year because as mentioned in the article eaton was hurt and had a terrible april, in contrast kiermaier had a great april, to the point of over 1 war, eaton was most likely negative. Kiermaier was most likely just under 5war in the last year and therefore not included. Also there have been a lot of kiermaier articles.
I’m confused, I pretty clearly said I enjoyed the entire article and I don’t dispute the thesis (Eaton is great and underrated), but for argument’s sake wanted to highlight another great and underrated player of a similar but distinct flavor. However, in an article mentioning the arbitrariness of samples, cutting out a bad month for one player and a good month for another player runs counter to that idea; having said that, you are correct that KK had an excellent start to 2015 which is excluded from this sample. Furthermore, KK is not “just under 5war in the last year” which you could have seen by simply clicking the leaderboard link in the article. None of what you posted here refutes anything in my initial comment, seems like you want to argue with me rather than discuss ballplayers. Sad!
I was guessing on just under 5 war, but he listed the 3 closest, and the 3 closest based on similar skillsets I.e. well above average hitters. He was referencing Eaton’s defense this year in terms of small sample which is why he included Eaton’s negative contributions last year. He chose to write about adam eaton, of course it makes sense to take out a bad april last year. I like discussing ballplayers, but kiermaier didn’t make sense in this narrative, if including kiermaier why not add pillar? Jackie Bradley might be at 4 war last calendar year now why not him, odubel herrera might be close Fowler… At what point does it end?
Again, I acknowledged that Eaton is a better hitter. August chose to write an article about Eaton. I chose to write a comment about KK, who easily makes sense in the narrative of “baseball’s quietest superstar”…for all the reasons stated above. If you want to write a comment about JBJr or Fowl being more worthy of that title, I’d certainly disagree with it but I wouldn’t question the validity of the idea.
Kiermaier is not in the table because he accrues his value in a very different way than Eaton. The sentence immediately preceding the table is, “…he’s gone about achieving quiet superstar status the way some of his other elite peers have:”
Kiermaier and Eaton have not achieved their status in the same way, at all.
I promise I am not out to get your favorite players. Kevin Kiermaier is awesome
I don’t know if there was something tonally in my comment that made it seem argumentative in terms of the article itself, I’m sorry if there was. I don’t think there’s much more I can add to your astute analysis of Eaton. I just wanted (for fun’s sake!) to take a look at KK’s candidacy for “baseball’s quietest superstar,” especially relative to other CFs as measured by fWAR.
I thought your comment was interesting and the tone was clearly non-argumentative. I’ve found the reactions to it to be pretty entertaining though.
August made a point that the article was emphasizing Eaton as a batsman. His wOBA last year and this are .346 and .364; meanwhile, Kiermaier produced .309 and.322. There is not much of a comparison, u til Eaton declines or Kiermaier improves. If we arbitrarily change the the way the conversation is framed, that does lead elsewhere. In terms of rugged handsome above average, I like the guy from Fort Wayne.
It’s not exactly apples-to-apples to compare Kiermaier’s PA total with Eaton’s; I can’t get past calendar year fielding splits, but presumably the difference in the number of innings they were in the field was much smaller than the difference in their PAs. And Kiermaier accumulates most of his value in the field, so that’s arguably more relevant than the number of PAs when comparing their opportunities to create value.
Thanks, this is something I forgot to consider. From 2015-2016 (the sample my comment proposed) Eaton has logged 1620 innings in the OF, while KK has logged 1485.1, or about 9% fewer innings. For PAs the gap is much wider, 866 to 662, or 24% fewer. This is almost certainly exacerbated by spot in the lineup moreso than games played.
KK is the fulltime starting CF but Kevin Cash isn’t afraid to sit him against tough lefties or give him an off day to rest, as he’s an all-out defender and the turf is unforgiving – possible explanations for the 11 game smaller sample size. I’m not sure how to extrapolate that into defensive WAR, but it’s interesting to consider.
I’m also not sure how to break that sample out into games played vs games started, because KK is almost always used as a lefty PH/defensive sub in games that he doesn’t start.
Woot! Southsiders.
Brandon Belt nods in agreement