Alex Gordon and the Royals’ Defensive Dominance

Alex Gordon is going to be a hot commodity on the free-agent market. Little thought will be given to exercising his current 2016 option, and then he’ll be available to anyone and everyone. The FanGraphs crowd expects him to sign for something in the neighborhood of five years and $90 million, and the crowd can end up low when predicting the higher tier. Relative to other free agents, the crowd puts Gordon’s contract between Chris Davis‘ contract and Jeff Samardzija’s contract in total cost.

Maybe Dayton Moore will be the guy who gives the contract. The Royals love Gordon, as anyone would, and he’s been with the Royals his whole career, and you might’ve noticed those Royals recently winning a championship. On their side, then, there’s new extra revenue, and there’s a natural desire to keep the same core. On Gordon’s side, he could be willing to entertain a bit of a discount, to remain where he’s been. He likes the organization, and now the organization’s successful. Good reason to stay.

There’s a lot of money out there, though. This is business, and perhaps Gordon will elect to leave Kansas City on top. People are driven to pursue new, fresh opportunities. There’s a strong chance Gordon doesn’t return, is the point. Maybe it’s 40%, or maybe it’s 90%. Gordon has been an absolutely phenomenal defensive left fielder. So because this era might be about to change, I’d like to quickly review what’s been a period of team-level defensive dominance.

Nothing about the Royals flies under the radar anymore. They’ve been in the spotlight two years in a row, and even their advance scouts now have drawn widespread praise. So the Royals are fairly recognized for having played great defense. You can see it when you watch — it’s not hard to spot — but there’s value in establishing context. How has the Royals’ defense compared to other defenses?

It’s easy to look at the yearly team leaderboards, but this hasn’t been a one-year thing. The Royals have been strong in the field for a while. Lorenzo Cain has been something like an everyday player for three years. And the Royals overall have seen a three-year window of success, jumping from 72 to 86 wins headed into 2013. As a matter of fact, since 2013, the Royals have the most regular-season wins in the American League. So what I decided to do was look at team defensive performance over three-year spans. What we have here are Defensive Runs Saved and UZR. The former stretches back to 2003, while the latter stretches back to 2002.

They’re not perfect measures of defense. There is no perfect measure of defense. That’s the caveat, which you already knew. But I can’t do better than this, personally, and the numbers do measure real signal. So, let’s just start. Here are the top 10 three-year windows of team DRS. So this covers 2003 – 2015, with 330 individual three-year windows serving as the data pool.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

Top 10 Three-Year DRS, 2003 – 2015
Seasons Team 3-Year DRS
2007-2009 Blue Jays 196
2013-2015 Royals 189
2005-2007 Blue Jays 189
2004-2006 Cardinals 181
2005-2007 Cardinals 179
2013-2015 Diamondbacks 178
2006-2008 Blue Jays 177
2006-2008 Cardinals 170
2011-2013 Diamondbacks 163
2009-2011 Rays 156

Here, you see the recent Royals in second place, trailing only three years of the Blue Jays from just before 2010. This says the Royals have saved about 189 runs in the field over three seasons, beating out the last three seasons of the Diamondbacks. But let’s move on to UZR, increasing our sample to 360.

Top 10 Three-Year UZR, 2002 – 2015
Seasons Team 3-Year UZR
2013-2015 Royals 192
2008-2010 Rays 155
2002-2004 Mariners 144
2009-2011 Rays 140
2008-2010 Giants 136
2002-2004 Dodgers 134
2003-2005 Mariners 132
2006-2008 Cubs 129
2007-2009 Phillies 126
2012-2014 Royals 126

Now, by a similar but different measure, we have the Royals in first, and by a pretty substantial amount. That’s a 37-run lead over second place, while 37 is also roughly the difference between second place and 12th. Sneaking in there at the bottom: three years of the Royals from before this most recent season. They weren’t a bad defensive team in 2012 — they just hadn’t yet peaked. This has been the peak. How about we look at one more table, where we average each team’s DRS and UZR figures? So the sample goes back to 330.

Top 10 Three-Year DRS/UZR, 2003 – 2015
Seasons Team 3-Year DRS/UZR
2013-2015 Royals 190
2009-2011 Rays 148
2005-2007 Blue Jays 137
2012-2014 Royals 135
2011-2013 Diamondbacks 134
2010-2012 Rays 128
2007-2009 Phillies 128
2006-2008 Blue Jays 125
2012-2014 Braves 124
2013-2015 Diamondbacks 124

First place, and first place by 42 runs. In fourth place: many of these same Royals players. I do understand that shifts do funny things to this data, and that’s increasingly been a problem as shifting has proliferated. I can’t make you any promises. But this does pass my own personal smell test. The Royals have kept many of the same players together. Many of those players appear to be defensively talented. So it shouldn’t be a surprise that the team defense has looked good, and remained good. Three years running, this has been a team strength, with the Royals having had arguably the very best three-year defensive window we have on record. The record doesn’t even cover a decade and a half, so, oh well, but there’s still been a lot of baseball that we’ve measured. In the field, the Royals appear to have dominated other teams. You can talk about their bullpen, and you can talk about their contact hitting, but if it weren’t for the defense, the Royals never would’ve gotten as far as they did.

And this doesn’t give them any credit they might well deserve for Salvador Perez’s handling of the pitching staff. They swear by the guy, so you can fold him in, too. Perez is sticking around. Eric Hosmer is sticking around. Mike Moustakas and Alcides Escobar and Lorenzo Cain are sticking around. Jarrod Dyson is sticking around. Ben Zobrist is probably leaving, but Omar Infante is under contract. The Royals should once again be really good defensively in the season ahead. We’ll just see what they do in the corners. Gordon, we know. He’s outstanding. If they decide they can’t afford him, I’d expect the replacement will be able to cover his share of ground. This is something the Royals treasure.

Years change, and rosters change, and performance levels change. There’s no way to know what the Royals pull off in 2016 and beyond. But the Royals, as a team, have had what’ll be at least a three-year peak. And defensively speaking, it’s been maybe the best three-year peak for any team since 2002. That is, 2002, at least.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
dcomegysMember since 2016
10 years ago

Jon Heyman loves this story

JJ
10 years ago

Three-quarters of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by the Royals outfield.

Garry Maddox
10 years ago
Reply to  JJ

That’s nothing, I used to do that by myself

Opie Curious
10 years ago

The crazy thing is they’ve left some defense on the bench. Jarrod Dyson’s a positive contributor when the opposing starter is right-handed, but they seem constitutionally averse to making him a regular starter/platoon. As good as Rios’s arm is, his coverage of the field is awful. As good a fielder as Paulo Orlando is, Dyson is better.

I don’t mind the idea of getting another theoretically-good hitter to play right field next year, but I would be more than happy to see them try a Dyson platoon with Orlando or Brett Eibner while spending the money somewhere else.

Opie Curious
10 years ago
Reply to  Opie Curious

For example, they could spend it on resigning Alex Gordon. That would be nice.

Kevin
10 years ago
Reply to  Opie Curious

Yes, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Eibner, who will be 27 in a few weeks, promoted to platoon in RF. That’s one way to save a bunch of money for a potential Gordon or Zobrist contract–a RF who makes under 600K. The problem is that I don’t think KC likes Dyson in RF, and shuffling Cain around is what cost him a GG in ’14.

Opie Curious
10 years ago
Reply to  Kevin

Well I’d say the GG for Cain in CF ship has sailed. If they’re insistent on nominating Trout, he can forget it, while Pillar and Kiermaier are about as good as he is.

I don’t really get why they wouldn’t like Dyson in right, but if that’s the issue, moving Cain seems totally reasonable. As a full-time right fielder he would probably be comfortably the best in the AL, and it’s not like he can get even fewer GG nominations than the zero he’s getting now if they decide to platoon him back to CF when Eibner/Orlando plays.

BenReverDoesSteroids
10 years ago

Why do the 07-09 Blue Jays have a DRS over 190, and a UZR under 126? Where did those 70 runs go?

Kevin
10 years ago

i noticed that too. Jays appear 3 times on the DRS list, essentially from 2005-2010, but not once on the UZR list.

MGL
10 years ago

They don’t go anywhere. Each one uses a slightly different methodology for estimating defensive performance. There is no “one number.” That’s why they have different names. It would look kind of silly and be pointless, if you saw on Fangraphs, this:

UZR DRS

+10 +10

-3 -3

+8 +8

Etc.

They tend to be similar and occasionally they are far apart. If you think they have roughly equal merit then average the two. Throw in 2 pinches of scouting and you have yourself a nice defensive number.

BenRevereDoesSteroids
10 years ago
Reply to  MGL

Aren’t they trying to quantify the same thing? Do we have even the roughest idea which one is closer? Or why DRS likes the Blue Jays more than UZR does? And why that discrepancy exists?

K
10 years ago

The answer to all of those questions is yes. You’re better off looking at the glossary and doing a cursory google search than asking for commenters to walk you through this, though.

Yirmiyahu
10 years ago

First of all, UZR does not rate P’s or C’s (unlike DRS). But we can remove the P and C data for the DRS to make it an apples-to-apples comparison. Even doing that, the 2003-2015 Blue Jays have a +327 DRS and a -28 UZR. On the opposite end of the spectrum, the Giants have a -53 DRS and a +355 UZR.

We can’t blame problems on OF dimensions either. Even after removing P’s, C’s, and OF’s, the 2003-2015 Blue Jays’ infield is +287 DRS and +21 UZR. The 2003-2015 Giants’ infield is +18 DRS and +232 UZR.

I’m not going to try to explain that, but when 2 measurement systems are trying to measure the exact same thing and they find vastly different results over a long period of time, it’s disconcerting.

Blue
10 years ago

I think Gordon is worth more to the Royals than any other team simply because fan goodwill for keeping the core together through 16 and 17 will make the fourth and fifth years of a deal, where he is being paid above his production, worth it.

Phaddix
10 years ago

I think the question for Moore is does he push all in and try to win again with this core in the next 1-3 years or does he allow the organization to take a small step back with hopes of rebuilding for 5-7 years out. If he chooses the former I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Royals make a push for both Gordon and Zobrist. Most Royal’s fans don’t see this happening – and I agree, signing Zobrist and Gordon would be out of character for an organization that has frequently avoided spending money.

That said both players are great fits for KC and given the Royals additional revenue from the postseason and record high attendance this year, they could make a run at them both. I could see both players taking small discounts (5% range) to stay with the Royals. Moore can continue to be conservative with other FA signings on the pitching staff while being aggressive on Gordon and Zobrist…

Illston
10 years ago
Reply to  Phaddix

It’s hard to say, given KC’s history with free agents, but their offseason plan could be a tell w/r/t how Moore views his team. Does he agree with public metrics (at least to some extent) that his team played over its head and the same group is likely to see pretty serious regression? Or does some evidence he has make him think this team is a 90+ game winner as constructed and keeping the band together means 2016 success?

Even with Sullivan’s recent poll results, I think almost any of the writers/commentariat here would take your longer view approach: save resources here and there and try to reload rather than push chips before a more complete rebuild. The most prominent team to do that recently, however, wasn’t exactly a shining success despite our taste for its main decision-maker.

Fatalotti
10 years ago
Reply to  Illston

Personally, I think they should follow the Giants strategy, which is try and comfortably stay in the 86-92 win window. This means you don’t push your chips in to be a 95+ win powerhouse like the Phillies did after the 2008 season. Be good enough to have a reasonable shot to make the playoffs, knowing that once you’re in the playoffs, you don’t need to be the best team to win it all.

I think they should make a reasonable offer to Zobrist and consider letting Gordon walk. Zobrist is going to be 35 and shouldn’t be that expensive, whereas Gordon, who’s going to be 32, could easily be a bad contract that holds them back in the coming years, considering that defense doesn’t always age well.

Ivan_Grushenko
10 years ago

What about Cuthbert and Mondesi? Can either or both take over the 2B and RF jobs? Or LF if Gordon leaves?

Opie Curious
10 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

As far as I know they haven’t even tried Cuthbert in either position. His minor league hitting numbers look a little like Alcides Escobar’s, which isn’t what I think you want in a corner outfielder.

Mondesi can’t hit—at all—right now. He’s super young, so he may figure it out and become a great player in a couple years. But it would definitely be in the infield: he’s so good defensively already that it’d be a waste to move him out of that position. If and when he is hitting at even Omar Infante levels, he would be another elite Royals defender.

KCFaninPA
10 years ago

If Gordon is looking at 5/$90-100M contract, then you have to let him go. Give him a qualifying offer and take the draft pick. Move Cain to RF and insert Dyson in CF. Sign Zobrist for 3/$30-36 and let him start at 2B and platoon with Orlando in LF. Infante is not going anywhere with his contract so I see him getting 2-3 starts a week at 2B. Still a plus defender and may rebound offensively this year if healthy. Look into 4-5 year contract with Cain, 2-3 with Dyson. Moose and Hosmer will never sign extension as long as Boros is their agent. They will both be gone in two years, which is our window to get back to WS. Rework Perez’s contract beyond 2019. Mondesi replaces Escobar in 2018, Cuthbert replaces Moose in 2018 and we need to develop or trade for a legit 1B to replace Hosmer in 2018.

Craig
10 years ago
Reply to  KCFaninPA

Except Zobrist will get something closer to 4/$70. He is gone.

corey
10 years ago
Reply to  Craig

4/70 is way overblown, 3/45 is more likely and if someone was to throw in the 4th year maybe 56. No one is paying Zobrist $18M for his 39 year old season.

Fatalotti
10 years ago
Reply to  corey

Yeah, I feel like people forget that Zobrist is going to be in his age 35 season, and while he’s still certainly a good player, it’s not hard to envision the sheen coming off him rather quickly, since a lot of his value is tied up in his defense.