An End-of-Season Top 100 Prospect List Update

I’ve made an end-of-season update to the top 100 prospects list, which you can now see on The Board. With the season is over, these rankings are frozen in the “2022 Updated” section of The Board, and aside from me pulling off some stray rookie graduates from this season, there will be no more changes until prospect lists start rolling out this offseason. As always, an arbitrary endpoint to the “top 100” list doesn’t make sense — the tier of players who are about as good as the 100th best prospect in baseball extends beyond that — so this is an ordinal ranking of the top 109 prospects in baseball at this time. This group will likely expand to close to 120 players throughout our offseason evaluations.
What might change now that the minor league season is over? We still have five weeks of Arizona Fall League, the tail end of instructs, and all of winter ball in Mexico, the Dominican Republic and Venezuela. Plus, whatever info and scout/industry opinions are on their way to my ears and brain are on a bit of a lag, which is especially relevant for the prospects who were in the DSL this year and at instructs in Florida.
This update was made with a focus on upper-level players, ones who are on the precipice of the big leagues and could conceivably play a role in 2023. I used a light touch on the Top 100 guys who are in the Fall League (you can see which prospects are playing there over on the Seasonal tab of The Board) since I’ll be evaluating that group in person over the next several weeks, and that includes players who had good seasons (like Jordan Lawlar) and guys who had rough ones (like Luis Matos). The Fall League is stacked, and I hope to see you out there.
Again, the top 100 is here in case you want to reference it as I talk you through the changes. Let’s start up top, where there’s been some reshuffling of the names that have occupied the first few spots. The most notable change is to Marlins righty Eury Pérez. Pérez has been my top-ranked pitching prospect since mid-year, but I’ve now bumped his FV grade so that he exists in a tier of his own. His size, stuff, polish, and on-mound athleticism are all exceptional, and this combination of factors puts him in his own stratosphere. I considered making him the top overall prospect for this reason before scouts who I’ve been chatting with on the backfields during instructs talked me down from having a pitcher in the top spot. If I had to compare him to someone, it would be CC Sabathia, who had similarly incredible touch-and-feel at his size, similarly huge pedal down the mound, and a similar arm stroke. Of course, Eury is right handed, spindlier than CC was, and doesn’t yet have a changeup as incredible as Sabathia’s became. It’s not a flush comp to the whole profile (the similarities are confined to size, athleticism and mechanics), I’m just trying to convey that Pérez is different than basically every other pitching prospect on the planet.
On the position player side, Jackson Chourio and Elly De La Cruz enter the 60 FV tier despite both having underlying swing-and-miss concerns. De La Cruz is going to be on the 40-man roster starting next year and is very close to the big leagues, and I’m more confident now than I was a year ago that he’s going to stay at shortstop. He has room to strike out a bunch and still be a star shortstop because of how much playable power there’s going to be.
Even while Chourio was performing from a surface-level stat standpoint, he had among the worst in-zone contact rates in minor league baseball for a time. In the 62 games he played at Low-A, only nine were played in ballparks with park factors under 115 according to Matt Eddy’s research on minor league park factors. Milwaukee’s Low-A ballpark has a home park factor of 115 and a home run park factor of 124 (!), and aside from the nine games I mentioned, Chourio played all of his road games in parks that were at least as offense-friendly as his home park. He slashed .324/.373/.600 in Low-A despite being in the bottom 10% of minor league in-zone contact rate during that span.
The thing about Chourio to remember, though, is that he’s just 18 years old and has quickly grown into elite bat speed. His in-zone contact rate improved throughout the season even as he was promoted, and he ended the year with a 76% in-zone contact mark. Analysts I’ve spoken to about this are split as to whether or not they are concerned about Chourio’s bat-to-ball skills. I do think there’s some risk here, but this is a player with a shot at being a 70 FV, so even as I’m baking risk into FV grades, he needs to be in that 60 FV tier.
Andrew Painter also moves into the 60 FV tier. He climbed all the way from Low-A to Double-A this season and by the end, he was showing advanced breaking ball usage (mixing slider and curveball shapes both in the zone for strikes and out of it for whiffs) and was working with an average-ish changeup, which was non-existent early in the year.
There have been some other changes to pitching up and down the list. D-backs pitcher Brandon Pfaadt moves into the 55 FV tier. He’s one of the few upper-level pitching prospects in baseball who can miss bats consistently with three of his offerings. Rays righty Taj Bradley moves into this tier, as well. A mistake I made with Spencer Strider was not considering that his fastball quality would help elevate how his slider plays. I won’t make this mistake with Bradley, whose slider has a 40% whiff rate this season even though it’s barely average visually. His fastball has all kinds of “round up” seasoning that forces hitters to try to cheat on it to catch up to it and lots of them end up pulling off of his slider, which Bradley commands consistently to his glove side.
The Fall Leaguer who I felt compelled to move already is Padres shortstop Jackson Merrill. Merrill’s feel to hit foundation has now been elevated with power as his body has started to mature, and he has the contact/power combination to be a star middle infielder. We’re talking about a teenage shortstop with a 90% in-zone contact rate and a 44% hard-hit rate on the season. Even at a fair distance from the big leagues, he’s a top-20 type of prospect at this stage.
If you revisit the list again, know that the group that runs from Rockies outfield prospect Zac Veen through Yankees prospect Jasson Domínguez is the one most likely to move into the 55 FV tier during the offseason as those players’ ceilings are re-evaluated; many of them are playing in Fall League. You could argue that this high-ceiling group extends down to Tigers pitching prospect Jackson Jobe. The hitters right in front of Jobe – Cubs shortstop Cristian Hernandez, Red Sox outfielder Miguel Bleis, and Rays infielder Junior Caminero – are the ones most likely to do next year what Chourio did this year. Hernandez and Bleis both have bat-to-ball question marks (Hernandez due to swing path, Bleis due to approach), but both have elite bat speed and huge physical projection. Caminero is less visually explosive from a tools standpoint, but his exit velos (and the consistency with which he’s hitting the ball hard) are remarkable for a player his age.
One offseason philosophical question to answer is how banning the shift should impact the way we think about evaluating these infielders. This applies mostly to shift-aided or shift-enabled prospects like Michael Busch, Jonathan Aranda, Spencer Steer, Miguel Vargas, Jordan Westburg, and other fringe or below-average infield defenders who have good bats. I haven’t really moved any of that group because I’m not yet sure how to answer that question, though I think it will be especially punishing for the players who will have to move off second base due to a lack of range.
Conversely, the players who have slam dunk middle infield defensive ability probably deserve a boost. I feel confident enough that this is true to have moved Orioles shortstop Joseph Ortiz, Brewers shortstop Brice Turang, and Royals shortstop Maikel Garcia into the 50 FV tier because they’re all at least competent at shortstop (Garcia is easily a plus defender) and have enough contact/on-base ability to play an everyday role. For those who care about this list for the purposes of their own fantasy team, you probably still just want to care about the bat-first or bat-only players.
Lastly, let me address Miguel Vargas specifically, since questions about him tend to find their way into my chats and inbox: I like him, I just don’t think he’s a star, and he’s on that 45/50 FV line for me. Third base is an extremely hard position to profile at right now because our current crop of hot corner occupants is so good, especially at the top of the position. Most of the argument for Vargas being a top 25 prospect is made on paper, but some of that is distorted by the offensive environment of the parks/leagues he’s played in as a prospect, including the PCL this year. He’s been a young-for-the-level hitter as a minor leaguer, but he’s not especially projectable or visually explosive from an eyeball scouting standpoint, so I’m less inclined to make age-based skill projection here. When you drill down into his underlying data, his overall statistical resume is close to average at third base (his bat-to-ball skills are plus, the power component more vanilla), but his defense pulls his overall profile down. If you project him in left field, he’s comfortably shy of what is typical of an average regular out there in most facets of offense.
Again, I like him and consider him an imminent, integral role player, but I don’t think he’s a top 10 hitter at 3B/LF/1B or anything like that. I realize I’m on an island in this regard, at least in the public space, and that’s fine. I just want readers to know that I’ve been constantly re-evaluating this guy, as well as my method for doing so, and think this is where he falls on the continuum.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
Thanks for the insight on Vargas Eric. It’s been an interesting evaluation the past few years for me, I really loved him early but his flaws became harder to ignore as he moved up the minor leagues. It’s going to be fascinating to watch his career play out.
Do you forsee an update to the 2023 draft board anytime soon?
The chances of Vargas getting stuck in an Edgar Martinez-type limbo in AAA or a bench role behind a less-deserving guy look pretty high imo. Alas, the chances of him becoming a poor man’s Edgar are not.
I forget now but I think that Kiley had Max Clark on top of his draft board. Dylan Crews, Jacob Gonzalez, Wyatt Langford, and Chase Dollander are the other guys on top of most lists I’ve seen. Enrique Bradford Jr, Travis Honeycutt, Jacob Wilson, and Kevin McGonigle seem to make up a chunk of the next tier down.
Enrique Bradfield* Jr….most dynamic player in college baseball. Please fall to Cubs!
I got see his ABs with the big club, and it definitely looked like he was overmatched at times, like a guy who was used to knowing where the ball would be and hitting the snot out of it only to find that the ball was very much not there. I don’t think that’s a knock on his ceiling (whatever it is), but I don’t think he’s a Seager-esque “hey, let’s make sure he starts some playoff games even if we don’t know his name” kind of prospect
It’s kind of remarkable how as I’ve transitioned from being a fan of one team (the White Sox) to following baseball nationally, by reading/podcast listening to prospect coverage from here, MLB Pipeline, and BA, how little I’ve been able to keep up with White Sox prospects. Because there is no coverage on all 3 sites, because there is nothing to remark on.
And somehow the White Sox fans that want to replace Rick Hahn are suggesting elevating Chris Getz to GM. Really, the guy overseeing the development of this farm system?
I think it’s been a pretty arrow-up year for them on the farm, no? Longenhagen is a little less enthusiastic than some others for now, which might change but at the beginning of the year they were the worst in baseball without a single 50FV guy. Montgomery’s skyrocketed to mid-top 100, Colas is around the end of top 100 per other publications now, Ramos has held serve from last year, Sosa and Perez have improved from afterthoughts to likely big leaguers. Position player dev has been maybe the only thing that’s gone right for that franchise this year
I would think that if you fire the head of baseball ops for performance-related reasons then probably you need a new person at the top to overhaul the system. I’m trying to think of a scenario when it would be justified, and I’m sure I could come up with one but it’s not the most likely scenario.
I’m probably too lenient on Hahn in general, but I feel like his entire tenure as GM has consisted of being forced to do things he doesn’t really believe in for a couple years, then going to the owner and saying “this isn’t working, can we try something modern now?” First it was the insistence on hoping for career years from free agent vets and “going for it” every year (sort of) around Sale and Quintana. Then he was allowed to rebuild, which went pretty well. But as soon as the team got good, he got saddled with a manager he didn’t want.
It is hard to judge his performance since you don’t really know which are his decisions, which come from Kenny WIlliams, and which are forced on him by Reinsdorf.
Thanks as always Eric for the great work. Lots to digest but one that jumped out at me was Ronny Mauricio upgraded from 50 to 55. I can only really see his statline so it was not what I expected and would love to hear more.
I don’t see how this year makes anyone more confident in his future big league role. He’s a low OBP guy and I don’t see how he runs into enough mistake pitches to be a 600 PA guy. Could be an interesting utility guy though playing an important super sub role since he’s clearly very athletic.
Yeah – Jeremy Peña is a useful player…but he wasn’t running 2022 Jeremy Peña lines in the minors.
I wonder if this is tied to Eric’s belief in the glove as expressed with other tooled up SS with approach issues. If you think Mauricio is a strong enough defender, it’s possible to imagine a switch-hitting Didi Gregorius outcome. Ignoring a pretty glaring difference in historical walk and strikeout rates, of course..,
Dustin Harris’ 45, what part of the look on him suggested he hasn’t got it yet?
Feel like Dominguez’s second half should have him in the 60 FV convo – he pretty much stopped striking out from August on, and the stat line doesn’t include his reign of terror in the EL playoffs!
He is starting to remind me a lot of Moncada. Huge power and speed who will run huge BABIPs but maybe not hit many homers.
For me, the main differentiator is the age and the contact ability.
They had similar surface level stats in Hi-A, but Dominguez struck out 3% less often…and was two years younger!
After what he did to the Sea Dogs, I wouldn’t be surprised to see him go full Julio next year.
Julio had a .325/.410/.581 line (10.4 BB% and 21.6 K%) in 28 A+ games as a 20 year old.
In Dominguez’s last 28 A+ games, he ran a .330/.419/.569 line with a 13.2 BB% and a 14.7 K%.
There’s a real chance he’s clicked and is about to be a problem sooner rather than later.
That seems a little optimistic. But the upside is there and the tools will play in some everyday capacity, especially if he sticks in CF (and I don’t see why he wouldn’t).
If I were ordering them I’d probably go Chourio, Dominguez, de la Cruz.
Oh, for sure – just saying that JD’s second half should completely reframe the conversation around him.
Closest Age-19 season I can find is Xander Bogaerts’…and that’s not bad company.
Luis Robert feels similar to me.
Agreed. 19 years old. Moving up to a higher level (high A), performing better while striking out less, then going to AA and destroying the playoffs. Should at least be a 55 but probably a 60. I think he’s a better prospect than Volpe since he’s faster and has more raw power while the hit tool looking similar enough. Also I think it’s interesting that Volpe was dropped in the midseason update to a 55, but was bumped back up to a 60 in the end of season update. I wonder why that is. Maybe the drop was premature and he changed his mind? Not sure..
I think it became emphatically clear that Volpe had just had a bad first six weeks in AA, rather than anything that should change his longterm outlook.
I think Eric said he didn’t look like a SS or something to that effect. I don’t really see how that changes in a couple months, but I’m glad to see it.
Guessing he did some math on the context of being a 60 Hit/60 Power guy with good 2B defense, haha.
With Kiley’s translation from 2014, that’s a .280/25 HR guy. Add in Volpe’s baserunning…and that profiles as Chase freaking Utley!
Great wrap up for this season, Eric. Thanks!
I’m a bit surprised that Tyler Freeman jumped from #109 to #74 after an uninspiring year at AAA (104 wRC+) and in the majors (76 wRC+ in 86 PAs).
Also surprised that Angel Martinez didn’t make the 50 grade list. A 20 year old SS/2B putting up a 140 wRC+ in Advanced A followed by a 120 wRC+ in AA (held down by a very low BABIP). Seems like that has to be awfully close.
Yeah I don’t understand how Angel Martinez is overlooked unless it’s Cleveland middle infielder fatigue. Offensive performance wise he’s done better than Rocchio or Freeman or Arias or any of them
Yeah, I don’t get it unless it’s a defensive value/position thing. Hitting wise, he and Rocchio seem pretty equal. Both were age 20 at A+/AA. Rocchio put up wRC+ of 110/135 whereas Martinez put up 140/120. Martinez also walked more and struck out less. So yeah, I don’t get it.
Rocchio is a 60-grade fielder and Martinez is a 40. If they are similar hitters, that’s plenty to explain the difference. Rocchio just has a much higher floor and more margin for error because of the defense.
Since when is Martinez a 40 defender? No grade or report I’ve seen rates him there, and he passes the eye test.
Completely agree on Freeman. Though it’s an incredibly small sample, in the handful of Cbus games I attended Freeman seemed incapable of impacting the ball with any force. It really stood out in comparison to guys like Naylor and Benson (Arias was hurt and Valera hadn’t been promoted yet) who were scorching the ball.
Naylor in particular presented as a future star in those looks. His discipline and contact ability looked mlb-ready.
The production the Braves got out of what was supposed to be a crappy farm system this year is nothing less than shocking. And if you only had prospect rankings to go by, you’d have missed it, as all those guys, the 1-2 NL ROY finishers as well as three other big-time contributors to the MLB club, went straight from lowly or non-prospects to graduates. The Braves still have a farm system that will likely grade out near the bottom next year, and that could very well be deserved.
All that success, if you only look at prospects, would vanish like a fart in the wind. Of course that’s not the case; no fans in baseball are happier about all their guys getting more juice as prospects than Braves fans are seeing our guys help us win in MLB.
Something to ponder – are the Braves exceptional in their ability to get their prospects to be successful almost immediately when they reach the majors? Except for Pache and maybe someone I’m forgetting at the moment, most of the Atlanta rookies don’t seem to suffer through the Kelenic/Adell level of growing pains when they come up. Even Riley, who went through ups and downs as a raw young player, was phenomenal in his first stretch in the big leagues. And they’ve always done well with rookie pitchers vs. the average team.
Are there actually ways in which a baseball org can get this type of success from their rookies? Could it be as simple as knowing exactly when a guy is ready to make the jump from the minors, or are there ways of “onboarding” a kid to get them off to a strong start?
Wondering if there’s advanced data on pitch recognition, etc that isn’t available publicly, which the Braves trust more than other orgs…which would make sense, after the Frenchy experience.
the BP guys have mentioned a few times that there’s some things prospects can prove in AA that smart orgs recognize as making AAA less necessary. so, Atlanta jumped Harris and Grissom from AA to the majors, but the Mets didn’t jump Álvarez.
Thanks for the update, and the details, Eric.
This is a pretty granular complaint, I guess, but it’s difficult to see how Masyn Winn could be characterized as a “high risk” prospect. Of the 23 shortstops in the top 100 at Pipeline, he’s the only one who grades out at 60 or better for fielding and throwing and running. In other words, even if you quibble with those specific grades a little, he’ll certainly help his team quite a bit even when he’s not hitting much. And why wouldn’t he hit okay, if at age 20 he clobbered High-A and held his own in Double-A (with a better BB/K than in High-A)? Looks like a fairly un-risky prospect to me.
He seems like a near guaranteed everyday shortstop. As I never get tired of pointing out, an average bat who is an average defender at shortstop is typically a 3.5 win player. If I had to guess his median outcome he looks a lot like that, and that’s a 55 / 60 border guy.
ERICK AYBAR!
The Erick Aybar zone lives!
Andrus and Kim just had Aybar seasons this year.
Yeah, I’d have to expect a specific concern with pitch recognition or a hole in his swing…because Andrelton was a 55 player with an 80 wRC+
I think it’s because you have to put a lot of stock in that small sample at High A to think he’s going to be an above average hitter. And he’s a 40-grade fielder, according to Fangraphs.
Projected to be a 50. And that’s before considering his an 80 grade, stone-cold, Shawon Dunston-type arm. I think he’s pretty likely to stick there.
Yeah, it’s difficult to see where that 40/50 grade on fielding comes from. He has above average range and a rifle arm that infamously hit triple digits during the Futures Game. So the raw material is there for certain. And his error rate was chopped in half from 2021 to ’22, as he finished with a miniscule 6 miscues in nearly 4 months of Double-A ball.
Maybe Winn’s glovework should be graded on a Cardinal Curve, as past St. Louis infield prospects Edman & DeJong both got Fangraphs fielding grades of 40/45. Turned out to be more like 65 for each.
As for the bat, he’s been either one or two years young for each level at which he’s played and been an average-to-outstanding hitter at 3 of 4 stops. I expect a 4-6 year prime with a cumulative 110-115 OPS+ and excellent baserunning to go with good shortstop defense.
Justyn Henry Mallow being the #32 Braves prospect doesn’t seem right
Big movement for the Pirates in Endy and Luis Ortiz. Sort of see a Spencer Strider starter kit for Ortiz in terms of pitch usage.
Fantastic writeup! Thanks Eric!
I think I more or less agree with everything here, except that I really don’t see how we can keep moving up Ronny Mauricio at this point.
I’m not sure what to make of Turang at this point. He hits a league-average batting line in MLB then he’ll be great, but there’s a lot of Nick Allen vibes here.
I still think Elly de la Cruz is going to disappoint but he’s now gotten to the point where it’s increasingly unlikely he’ll bust entirely. So much depends on his defensive home / ability and hit tool but I’m starting to see a few different pathways to the bigs–one pathway looks a bit like Joey Gallo, another like Keon Broxton, and yet another like Bo Bichette. I suspect he may not have a particularly long career as a star since he’s likely a tools-over-skills guy but I wouldn’t be surprised to see him have a couple good seasons (perhaps star level seasons) even if he’s frustrating in the others.
I’m a little skittish on Chourio but I think the upside justifies it. He’s clearly a better prospect than anyone in the draft last year, and I think that assessment would have held going back to Adley. The High A performance is more what I think he’s at going forward but he was only 18 and he was still improving. And he’ll probably stick in CF too. He’s probably not Julio Rodriguez but if you said he had a rookie year like Julio did this year, I guess I wouldn’t be surprised either.
I don’t know what Evan Carter has to do to get Top 100 love but I’m here for him. He looks like he could even be a 55.
Agreed re Ronny Mauricio. Considering his overall stagnation and the poor plate discipline markers, he really should be multiple grades below guys like Lawler and Tovar.
And I concur too about Evan Carter. Carter is a top 15-20 overall prospect for me, no questions asked. His age, multi-season production, superb BB/K tally, speed scores, and solid chance to stick indefinitely in center field, all of these are in his favor. Red flags? What, he wasn’t highly regarded prior to the draft? Who cares now?
And why would he be “high risk”? That descriptor is for overage guys, or hitters with no defensive home or bloated strikeout rates or an inability to take a walk. I don’t see any way that Carter stays healthy and is less than a 2-WAR regular. That’s awfully low risk.
Stagnating how?
Mauricio was one of the youngest players in AA, hit 26 HRs, stole 20 bases and will stay at SS.. and switch hits with power from both sides. Yes, there’s some variance in the outcome but the ceiling is high.
The skeptical view on him would be that he’s reached his developmental peak, but at 21, I prefer to think there’s more runway and with loud tools, he could become a big player.
Maybe “stagnating” was a bit harsh. But he isn’t improving at anything meaningful, in my opinion. The homers and steals look great for fantasy baseball purposes, but his wRC+ at the four levels with 200+ plate appearances has been 101, 93, 94, and 105.
Meantime his BB/K ratio has gradually eroded level-over-level, and wasn’t strong to begin with. In rookieball it was 0.32, and since then it’s 0.23, 0.24, and finally 0.19 in AA this year. The latter is surely in the danger zone.
Ronny’s gotten better at base stealing but he’s still not good, with 20-for-31 in 2022. And his GIDPs are rising as his triples decline. So I just don’t know about the speed tool or how much practical utility it has in game situations.
And of course, he hasn’t hit .270+ since 2018. Even hitters young for their leagues usually have a sustained burst at some point, something to signify their talent, if they’re going to be above average regulars or more at the MLB level. Maybe that breakout is coming, I dunno.
His hit tool remains below average, with fairly bad plate discipline. His ceiling right now is Javy Baez without the defense.
I’m probably more bullish on Chourio the more I think about him. I have to think that he’s further along at his age than say George Springer, and he could have a Starling Marte type of upside. Not a Julio type prodigy, but probably in that very next tier.
It’s very difficult to FV60 someone who hasn’t succeeded at AA yet but in his case, it’s a bit like “what else do you want him to do?” How many high schoolers would you expect to hit high-A pitching? And he’s clearly still improving. And he will probably stick in CF. This is like Harper-level stuff. The list of guys who do this is super short. I don’t actually think this is like Giancarlo Stanton or Bryce Harper but how about Tatis Jr? I think it’s possible.
List of people I can think of that held their own above Low-A at 18 is Trout, Harper, Julio, Vladdy Jr., Machado.
Acuna, Heyward and Soto spent the full season in Low-A.
Tatis and Mondesi skipped over Hi-A and got overwhelmed.
And re 18-year-olds, you can kinda sorta add Jordan Walker to that list, as he was 18 for the first 6 weeks of the 2021 season and posted a 205 wRC+ in Low-A and 124 in High-A.
Chourio (and Walker to a certain extent) is in mighty good company. I’d say anything less than stardom would be a surprise for Jackson C. at this point — especially if his CF glovework is even close to what Clay Davenport’s website asserts (Kiermaier-esque).
His season was *very* comparable to Julio’s age-18 year.
Hell, Acuna didn’t Hi-A until he was 19.
Chourio has a genuine chance to make the majors as a teenager, and that’s not normal, haha.
More thoughts:
Of the guys who haven’t debuted yet, I think it’s pretty clearly Eury Perez as the best prospect. He’s a pitcher, and pitchers are risky, but I think he’s a probable league ace if he stays healthy (big “if”).
If you include guys who have debuted I think it’s Gunnar and Corbin Carroll, in the top tier, with Perez after them (all FV65), and then a pretty noticeable gap. I don’t have a clue who would be at the top guy in the FV60 grouping. Chourio, Wood, Grayson Rodriguez and Francisco Alvarez all have a claim I’d think.
Endy Rodriguez is probably the catcher of the future at this point, no? Maybe he and Henry Davis rotate at C and RF or or 1B or DH or something but he’s definitely the real deal. I’ve always liked him, but he was so far away from the majors and catching is so hard on the body. But now he’s almost here.
Kyle Manzardo is the real deal. He and Mead are probably both guaranteed to hit enough to profile as everyday guys at positions with high offensive bars. Hard to know how much better than that given how hard it is to profile with their defensive abilities, but I think they’ll be solid and sooner rather than later.
Something seems wrong with Jack Leiter. I still think there’s hope for him–there are a lot of similarities to Freddy Peralta here–but guys who get down on the mound like that often have command issues.
I think Bobby Miller probably has to be an FV55 at this point. He will miss bats.
The Pirates are big on having its position player prospects learn multiple positions. So, Sadtrombone is right.
I think the question is whether they’ll be able to run around in the outfield after catching, but it seems to me that if Davis continues to improve behind the plate they’ll both get about 350 PAs there and another 250 somewhere else. Although if Davis doesn’t improve there I think he moves well enough to handle RF full time.
My hot take prediction on Davis is that he catches well enough to become the next Chris Hoiles.
Which is actually an nice outcome for a 1-1 pick.
Endy Rodriguez is athletic and has played:
Catcher
1st Base
2nd Base
Left Field
I would put Rodriguez at Catcher because of his defense with Davis spelling him. Davis can play First Base, and catch when Rodriguez needs rest.
I’d much rather play Endy at a position that doesn’t destroy his knees and that prolongs his career. Davis is much less versatile and I’d rather that he catch with Endy spelling him occasionally. I seem to be in the minority on this.
I’d like Bobby Miller’s performance to start matching up with his stuff. He was a little better in AAA but he hasn’t sold me yet. You’d think a guy who could throw 100 deep into a game with plus breaking stuff would be getter better results than he has.
Wonder why Frelick wasn’t in top 100?
I don’t know but I would take him over Turang in a heartbeat.
The prospect team recognized the performance of Endy Rodriguez. I believe his FV is too low at 55. He can hit for average, and hit for power, he draws walks and doesn’t whiff often. Moreover, his skilled defense and his 2022 hitting makes him look like a superstar in waiting.
Some disagreements here, with the usual caveat that Eric is much more qualified at his job than I would be, just some personal opinions.
Will start with the homer takes: Samuel Zavala should be a 50 FV, what he did at his age is very unusual in pro ball, he projects for average to above average power with possibly premium OBP skills. I think Lesko should be a 55 FV even with the TJ, his upside is so immense and up there with eury and grayson. Of course he needs to be lower than them for obvious reasons (performance in pro ball tbd plus TJ already) but I believe he should be a 55 FV.
Now for the non homer takes. Ronny moving up doesn’t make sense to me, yes his raw power is playing in games more than before, but he still put up a sub 300 OBP, and his plate discipline isn’t at all improved. For me he is a 45+.
Endy is still about 20 spots too low, his skill set is very rare for a catcher, potential for plus hit with above average power for any position let alone catcher. On another note the Mets could very well regret trading him for Lucchesi
Brennen Davis/Luis Matos/Owen Caissie/Austin Martin/Tyler Freeman are some players that I thought should have had bumps down and some guys that I should have thought deserved bumps up Logan O’Happe/Kyren Paris/George Valera/Jud Fabian/Elijah Green should all be higher imo, Green as a 45+ doesn’t make any sense
thanks for the hard work…
curious about Andres Chaparro and Leandro Cedeno. Are these guys not even worthy to be on the list?
both had good years…any thoughts?
thanks
The offensive bar at 1B is really, really high…and Cedeno might be a DH.
I’ll definitely be interested in a Chaparro write up – he had 115 mph exit velocities in the fall league last year.
I have been eagerly awaiting this update so thanx, Eric, for doing it.
FYI, Langeliers has 142 MLB AB so he shouldnt be eligible for the list. Also, there is no #37 listed and you have 2 #58s.
As a Nats fan, the rise of James Wood from off the board at the start of the year to #9 is kind of heartening. Also, I’m curious about the impact of Cole Henry’s thoracic outlet surgery on his ranking. I’m a little surprised he’s still as high as #95. TOS seems like desperate voodoo at this point. I think the track record is a better younger than the 30+ year olds that recently had it (Harris, Strasburg).
James Wood is such a fun player!
I’m not sure I see 40-plus slots of daylight between him and Dominguez, though?
The latter is 5 months younger and had a much better second half at a higher level.
That Eury/CC analogy was perfect.
I don’t follow prospects that closely but I really appreciate the thoughtful approach on Miguel Vargas. I think one of the failings of prospect lists is we get caught up in the 20-80 grades on the 5 tools or general athleticism and not enough on what kind of stat line (or what value) will he produce at the major league level.
I think this is the opposite of what is happening with Vargas. He is putting up the stats in the minors which is causing some people to ignore some of the grades on his defense and raw power.
So Jordan Lawlar and Marcelo Mayer are two of the top prospects from the 2021 MLB Draft. But I’d say that all of James Wood, Colton Cowser, and Andrew Painter are ahead of them. Prett neat.
I disagree heavily on cowser/painter
Cowser’s K rate is a big red flag
Not a believer in Mason Montgomery I see.
Hi, I’m a 19-year old catcher who just hit .312/.435/.530 in A ball in 111 games. Oh, I walked at a 14.2% rate and only struck out at a 17.7% rate, and my defense is solid enough that scouts say I can stick at catcher and be average defensively or better. But I only have a 40+ FV according to the good folks at Fangraphs, for some reason, which hasn’t budged all year. Weird.
Edgar Quero does look pretty good but I can see waiting on him because of the track record of teenage catching prospects.
Unless there are serious questions about Quero’s defense and game-calling, I agree that he looks like at least a 45 with a vaulted ceiling to rise to as he advances. 40+ seems too tepid.
When I saw the name Chourio, I thought it was going to be about Jaison Chourio
The idea of Ronny Mauricio—who can’t learn to walk and whose OBP is forever stalled at .300—clocking in at #32 among all of prospectdom just seems weird to me.
He’s also in the organization that is still probably about the worst organization to teach strike zone judgment to hitters. Add in the problems attending a player who consistently makes 35 errors per season (pro rated to 1350 innings), year in and year out, and it’s difficult to believe Mauricio’s being evaluated correctly.
How is Wilmer Flores down at a 45 & Detroit’s #12 prospect? That one badly needs updating.
I thought for sure we’d see Addison Barger somewhere on The Board. Oversight, or is just a mirage?
Agreed he warrants a top 100 slot for sure.
Probably not there due to (1)being a 6th-round pick; (2)positional uncertainty (though he appears to be decent enough at 3rd and mayyybe even shortstop); and (3)a prohibitive strikeout rate in 2021 despite his being old for Low-A at the time.
I like him. Home/Road splits are fine, as are his L/R splits, and he hit older pitchers even better than younger ones (.947 OPS versus .889), and finished the season with a flourish (September OPS near 1.100 across AA and AAA). I think I’d have him somewhere in the 50-65 range pending more information. One last “problem” with Barger is that there’s a raft of really, really good middle infield prospects right now, so a merely age-approprite guy can easily be overlooked.
He’s not on the board at all, though, when you expand to infinity. Surely he’s better than a 35+ FV, no? Just leads me to believe its just an oversight….
This past update was just updating guys around the top 100, so if Eric doesn’t think he’s that high but is let’s say a 40+ that still wouldn’t be shown on the board. I’d assume he’s just a guy they’ll add to the pre season list come next year.
That makes sense. Eric’s got a lot on his plate, and appreciate all the work he does here!
I must be missing something. If Eury Perez is so great, why is he not on the list? The list I’m looking at (click on the link in the article in paragraph 4) starts with 60 FV guys and begins with Moreno.
Gee, thanks for being so helpful, folks who downvoted without explanation. But when I click on the list now, Eury is #2, so I’m good, thanks to FG if not to some readers.
It’s nice to see Taj Bradley reassessed. He was one of the few OFP grades I strongly disagreed with.