Andrelton Simmons Is Cool Again
Young players are fun, because young players are fresh. They give us something new to think about, keeping baseball just spicy enough to ward off too much boredom. Every young player comes with some form of strength, and it’s entertaining for a while. In time, we get used to it. Then there are new young players.
When Andrelton Simmons was younger, he was all over the internet. His strength was that he played like one of the best defensive shortstops in baseball history, and that made an immediate impression. It felt for a while like, every other day, there was a new Simmons clip that people would fawn over. And, justifiably so — Simmons was doing things other people couldn’t do. But, ultimately, humans are humans, and Simmons stopped feeling so exciting. We came to expect the defense. The bat didn’t develop. New players came around. Simmons turned just 27 last September, but he was all but absent from the conversation about the new wave of shortstops.
And, hell, that makes some since, given that by now Simmons counts as a veteran. This is his sixth year playing in the major leagues. I mentioned, though, that he’s only 27. Simmons is making himself relevant again. He’s showing off a new trick, one we waited for for years.
I think it’s pretty well understood how defensive aging curves work. That is, players tend to get worse pretty quickly, as they get older and lose some of their youthful athleticism. Simmons doesn’t have quite the same body he did five years ago, I’m sure, but just in case you were wondering, no, he hasn’t visibly lost a step. Simmons is still maybe the best defensive shortstop in baseball. I can’t prove that, but an argument exists. It’s about as strong as any other argument for any other player. Here’s a recent clip of Simmons making a classic Simmons play in the hole:
That’s fun! This is also fun. Painful even to watch, but fun nevertheless.
Meanwhile, here’s Simmons instantly changing direction on a dime.
Simmons is still outstanding in the field, is part of the point. That skill hasn’t deteriorated. What’s most notable is that more offense is starting to show. Simmons isn’t a great hitter, and I doubt he’ll ever be one. Yet he is an improving hitter, to say nothing of the fact that he’s also seemingly learned how to steal bases. That’s a neat extra ability, but on the year, Simmons has a 109 wRC+, which is two points lower than Francisco Lindor. Over the past *calendar* year, Simmons has a 108 wRC+, which is…two points lower than Francisco Lindor. This season, Simmons ranks fifth among shortstops in WAR. Over the past year, he still ranks fifth among shortstops in WAR. The list:
- Corey Seager, 7.2 WAR
- Francisco Lindor, 5.5
- Carlos Correa, 5.4
- Jean Segura, 5.4
- Andrelton Simmons, 5.2
There’s effectively no difference between second and fifth. They’re all just there in a group, as Simmons has added enough at the plate to make himself a star. He’s unlikely to be recognized as such, but I doubt the Angels care about that, as long as Simmons does what he’s doing.
Simmons has always been good about making contact. For his career, he’s struck out in 9% of his plate appearances. For just this season, he’s struck out in 9% of his plate appearances. That gives him the fourth-lowest rate among qualified hitters, and, just for fun, over the past month, Simmons has struck out in 3% of his plate appearances, the lowest rate in baseball by far. Simmons has always gotten the bat on the ball. He’s gotten a modest boost from his current career-high 9% walk rate. Simmons has whiffed just one more time than he’s walked.
What’s of further interest is Simmons’ developing contact quality. Last night, he hit his seventh home run, after having hit four in each of the last two years. Now, I get it — home runs are everywhere these days. Many players are showing a home-run increase. But Simmons’ improved wRC+ reflects how he’s outpaced the mean. And for someone with such low power numbers in recent years, it’s not like Simmons is built to be a slap hitter. This home run, from not long ago, was a blast:
Simmons does possess actual pop. When he was younger, he arguably tried to tap into it too often, which led to a pop-up problem. That problem no longer exists. The strength is in there for Simmons to be dangerous, and just as interesting as the homer above is this recent homer in Houston:
Yeah, it only barely got out, but it did get out. That was the first opposite-field home run of Simmons’ career. It’s a sign of Simmons’ contact improvement, even to all fields.
Simmons’ hard-hit rate to the pull side is the highest it’s been in years. His hard-hit rate up the middle is higher than ever. His hard-hit rate to the opposite field is also higher than ever. Simmons, for the first time, has hard-hit rates of at least 30% in all three directions. Of the 201 current players in baseball with enough batted balls to all fields, only 41 of them meet the same criteria. That obviously doesn’t mean that Simmons has turned into an elite-level hitter, but any improvement is important, and he doesn’t need to be a slugger to be incredibly valuable.
Here are Simmons’ overall hard-hit rates, expressed not as raw rates, but rather as percentile rankings within MLB:
- 2013: 21st percentile
- 2014: 22nd
- 2015: 9th
- 2016: 3rd
- 2017: 42nd
Year to year, Simmons has gone from having one of the very lowest rates to looking just about average. There are just seven hitters who have improved their hard-hit rates by at least 10 percentage points since last season, and Simmons is one of them. He’s there with names like Paul Goldschmidt, Miguel Sano, and Brett Gardner. When you don’t strike out very often, your contact needs to be only so good. Simmons has crossed whatever the threshold might be.
This is what Simmons’ hard-hit rates have looked like over his career, over 60-game stretches:
Simmons hasn’t hit like this since 2014. Now, he did subsequently collapse, and that’s what you always have to worry about, but it’s encouraging to see that he’s hit the ball pretty well to all fields. That seems like it ought to protect him to some extent. I’ll also note that, while Simmons has gotten better about going to center and right, he’s willing to turn on a pitch if he sees the opportunity.
It’s been a while since Simmons has pulled the ball, too. He’s starting to show some of the thump he had early on with the Braves, but paired with a more mature approach. An approach that leads to fewer pop-ups and fewer empty flails. Simmons will still sometimes over-swing, and he’ll still sometimes flail, but he’s laying off enough garbage to avoid too many of the easy outs.
If you ask Simmons, he’ll probably say he feels better now than ever. Going into last season, and for a few months, Simmons used something of a leg kick in the box:
Some players like having a leg kick, and some players don’t. I don’t know whether it’s related, but Simmons’ offensive improvement is linked to his going back to a toe-tap:
He’s a little quieter, and although Josh Donaldson wouldn’t be better with a toe-tap, Simmons would swear by it. The evidence would suggest it’s been good for his timing. He’s stayed on more pitches more often, and he’s become something of a modest threat to every direction.
That’s all that Simmons needs. Think about it — he’s sort of like the Kevin Kiermaier of the infield. Kiermaier has a career 104 wRC+, but he’s been worth more than 5 WAR per 600 plate appearances. Simmons has been worth a little under 4 WAR per 600 plate appearances, with a career 87 wRC+. Any sort of offensive growth would turn Simmons into a greatly valuable everyday player, and the positive signs are present. He’s walking a little more. He still doesn’t strike out. And when he makes contact, he’s making just enough quality contact. Not Sano-level contact, but that isn’t necessary. Simmons has hit enough balls on a line, which is all that anyone wants him to do.
From all indications, Andrelton Simmons, today, is something like a league-average hitter. Maybe even a hair or two better than that. I don’t think the Angels could be more excited.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.




It’s unfortunate how terrible Angels depth is plus that the rotation is made of glue. Calhoun, Simmons, Richards are fun. And yes I know they’ve been fluky good without Trout and I’m expecting dumb articles to come on how Angels are better without him
Some people still don’t like this trade for the Angels. It baffles me. Even if Sean Newcomb becomes solid, this trade was at worst a win-win for LAA
When Simmons first came to the Angels I was surprised how raw he looked offensively. He had shown 17 homerun power in his early days, and decent walk rates when batting in front of the pitcher, but what the Angels got was a guy who was determined to put every pitch in play towards the opposite field.
He made a lot of adjustments last year, which started to pay off in the latter part of the season. He is now looking to punish fastballs in hitters counts, and he is by no means afraid of pulling the ball. He’s also stopped swinging at everything – he lays off 2-0 curveballs or anything he isn’t looking for. The result has been that pitchers are a little more cautious with him, and he’s drawing more walks.
Obviously the league could make an adjustment, but he’s been cruising around a 110 wRC+ since coming back from his hand injury last June.
Yeah that was one of the few poor moves of ATL’s regime. Should have gotten quite a bit more, Newcomb still can’t throw strikes. Nice debut tho
With Trout saying he think he can return around 7/11, I feel like it’s actually not that ridiculous to suggest the Angels might hang around in this 2nd WC race. They’re over .500 and are currently projected to finish with 78 wins, 6 less than the top 2nd wild card contender Toronto is expected to finish with. It probably won’t happen but if they can hold their head above water for the next month or so maybe they have a shot plus the American league is really mediocre behind the top 4 teams. I just want Trout to be in the playoffs so badly, i’m holding out any hope.
FG Playoff Odds has them around 8.5% to make the Wild Card. Like you said, it’s not that crazy!
Are the Angels officially “Padres Bad”?
Considering their best player is out for a month, they’ve lost 3 pre-arbitration starters and their ace (Garrett Richards) for more than extended periods of time, and that Danny Espinosa/Luis Valbuena have severely underperformed, no, they are not “Padres bad” and they never were to begin with.
I’ll take that as a long-winded and extremely defensive “yes,” Senor Anaheim.
Simmons is definitely cool — apparently it’s still cool to rag on the Angels, too! Padres: 14GB of a wild card. Angels: 0.5GB of a wild card. No, the Angels are definitely not “Padres bad”
The Angels are a slightly above average baseball team when Trout returns, with a shot at a wild card berth. FanGraphs projections had the Angels as winning a wild card during the pre-season.
No idea when it became cool to think the Angels are terrible.
Really, you don’t?
The answer(s), of course, is/are 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017. Were it not for the near-tragic presence of Mike Trout on these moribund squads they are hilariously, embarrassingly, contract-the-Angels-ly bad.
2013 and 2016, yes sure, even though a completely decimated rotation in 2016 accounted for part of it (I mean, come on, they had to use Weaver AND Lincecum AND Oberholtzer).
But 2015 was done in by a bad August team-wide and this year they are above .500 without Trout, the majority of their starting pitchers, and the majority of their bullpen.
A star helps of course, but doesn’t every decent team have to have stars in order to be decent? Simmons, Calhoun, Maybin, Valbuena, Escobar….I mean these aren’t nobodies. They’ve been around a while and have all had GOOD seasons before. Never mind Pujols. This is a very different team than what they have had to field.
I’m sad you didn’t mention his, very cool, Adrian Beltre-esque homer from last night.
That was pretty cool: http://m.mlb.com/video/v1500683883/nyylaa-simmons-smashes-goahead-homer-from-one-knee/?game_pk=491085
I thought the pitch was lower at first, but I think what happened is that Simmons adjusted his swing at the last split second when he identified breaking ball. Which caused him to end up off balance on 1 knee. Still pretty cool.
This year he’s well above average hard% in the graph, but 42nd%ile in the table? I know median ≠ mean, and this is possible, but is everything okay with the numbers?
The line in the graph reflects his own career average, and not the MLB league average. I know it’s weird.
Maybe the uniform has been the only thing I used to identify baseball players this whole time, but that first homer almost looks like a Trout swing, the way he kind of leans forward over the plate.
I think it was dumb that he was made a groundball slapper after his 17 hr year was dumb.
Yeah he popped up a ton and his babip was low but while he doesnt have a lot of power he clearly showed that he at least was able to hit with slightly below average power.
Let him hit with above average contact, not a lot of walks and slightly below average power and a lowish babip due to pop ups (basically adding to his Ks) and also a lot of outfield flyouts and you probably get a decent like 95 wrc+ hitter which works with his glove.
But instead he was probably told “don’t pop up or hit flyouts” and “use your contact, keep it low and run” which clearly doesn’t work.
They basically made him billy hamilton at the plate although he clearly has more pop and probably around grade 45 power or so.
The high pop up low babip profile was a flawed one but it wasn’t terrible considering his defense and over time he might have harnessed his pop ups a little.
Fortunately the slap grounders to second base thing that was still used in pro ball just 2-3 years ago seems to be over.
Now I don’t think he could ever become a good hitter but he also doesn’t need to.
Even a routine groundball to Simmons can put a smile on my face. He plays the position so effortlessly. The fact that he is contributing with his bat is just icing on the cake.
Simmons making Gregorius look bad. That “changing direction on a dime” play is exactly the play Didi couldn’t make which allowed the Angels to walk off in the same game. Although the real difference is having Eric Young running instead of Matt Holliday.
I’m gonna say this and duck, because it’s total blasphemy. Simmons has the potential to have an Ozzie Smith like career. Doesn’t mean he will because he’d need to play until his late 30s and his track record of hitting isn’t that long, but now that he’s hitting it’s a real possibility.
Ain’t blasphemy in the least bit, if you’re talking about overall value. Ozzie was basically a Mark Belanger clone until he got to St. Louis and started to be a league-average hitter, about the same age as Simmons is now.
As far as all-time defensive shortstops, he would have to keep his excellence up until his late 30’s like Ozzie did to even be in consideration for the GOAT. He does stand a good chance to end up neck-and-neck with Belanger for the second-best ever (I’ll duck from any Vizquel fans out there.)
Potential, yes. And I get that you’re mainly noting their similar arcs, plus you made all the appropriate caveats. I still have to say, it’s a VERY slim chance.
I’ll use B-R WAR, which is much kinder to Simmons than is FG.
— At this season’s pace, he projects to have just under 28 bWAR through age 27.
— That would leave him more than 48 bWAR behind Ozzie’s career.
— Only 5 shortstops ever had 48 bWAR from age 28 on: Wagner, Appling, Ozzie, Ripken and Reese. (That’s with a threshold of at least 30% of games played at SS.)
Historic totals are built in the 30s. It’s hardly worth talking about before then.
A 110 wRC+ Andrelton Simmons is an MVP caliber player
He’s a very good player, but MVP-caliber is a stretch. Fangraphs has him tied for #17 in AL WAR, while Baseball-Reference says tied for #7. His current pace is 4.3 fWAR, 6.3 bWAR.
Hall of Famer Ozzie Smith had 0 of his 6 5-WAR seasons by the time he was 27, and never topped an 84 wRC+ (career 90 wRC+) until he was 29.
Just sayin’.
The first clip of him doing the Jeter jump throw except it’s a laser and hits Pujols directly on target is the good stuff. Watching guys with plus arms do that, like peak Tulo used to, is one of those ‘these guys are special’ moments.
Every single time I watch that clip I expect the ball to bounce before hitting the glove. I’m going to go back and check again now.