A’s Acquire Reliever, Like Always

It’s July, which means the A’s are trading to improve their bullpen. Whether it’s Jake Diekman, Mike Minor, Jeurys Familia, or any of a seemingly unending number of other moves, they always seem to find an arm they can bring in to redo their leverage roadmap and provide a little extra playoff oomph. Last night, they acquired Andrew Chafin in exchange for Greg Deichmann, Daniel Palencia, and cash, as MLB.com’s Mark Feinsand first reported.

Chafin has been downright spectacular this year. In 39.1 innings, he’s allowed only nine runs, good for a 2.06 ERA. He’s done so by limiting home runs; he’s only given up one all year, and while that’s unlikely to persist, he does plenty of things right that should continue to limit homers. He gets grounders, with a 50% groundball rate so far this year. He’s limited hard contact, too: opponents have barreled up only 5.1% of their batted balls and have hit only 32.3% of them 95 mph or harder.

Do those two things, and homers are harder to come by. Baseball Savant’s xHR, which is a descriptive estimate of home runs based on contact quality, thinks Chapin “should” have allowed only 1.1 dingers so far this year. That doesn’t mean it will keep happening — it’s based on the actual contact allowed, which is volatile — but it’s a good sign that he hasn’t given up 20 warning track blasts or anything of that nature.

Keep home runs down, and the rest of the game comes easily. Chafin hasn’t run up a gaudy strikeout rate this year — 24.7% is fine but not outstanding. He walks an average number of batters. He’s allowed only a .204 BABIP, keyed both by that soft contact and by tremendous defense; per Statcast, Cubs defenders have saved five outs above average with Chafin pitching, the difference between a silly and merely above-average BABIP.

Those sound like flukish skills for a pitcher to possess. Limiting homers? Turning balls in play into outs? Are the A’s trading for a flash in the pan? Maybe, but Chafin is ideally suited for their team and stadium. Oakland’s infield is fourth in baseball in outs above average; the team as a whole is third. The Colosseum, meanwhile, suppresses homers, as it’s huge, and Mount Davis makes for crazy wind patterns.

The A’s could use the bullpen help anyway, given that they’re 18th in relief WAR. They could also use another lefty arm; Diekman and Sam Moll were the only two in the ‘pen, and while the former has been steady, the latter got lit up in Triple-A with the Diamondbacks before Oakland purchased his contract. Adding a reliable arm — particularly a lefty — was surely a team priority.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

If you’re intent on looking for it, you could even find upside in Chafin (not that you need a lot of upside from a guy posting a sub-3 FIP). His slider might be his best pitch; it’s more vertical than horizontal, looking nearly like a curveball from its flight pattern, though it has the distinctive gyro spin of a slider. He commands his sinker well, running it in on the hands of lefties and hunting the outside corner against righties. He even has a four-seamer, which he throws a quarter of the time. It’s mostly useful for keeping people off of his other fastball; he spots it on the opposite side of the plate and it has far less run, which gives batters another look to focus on.

No two ways about it; Chafin will be a useful bullpen piece for the A’s. It’s basically a rule at this point that Oakland will somehow assemble an excellent bullpen capable of bailing out a shaky rotation. The only wrinkle here is that the rotation has been pretty good this year, which means the team may have an excellent bullpen supporting an underrated rotation, another classic A’s trope.

To secure Chafin’s services this year (he’ll hit free agency this offseason unless he and the team exercise a mutual option), the A’s surrendered two interesting prospects with wildly differing timelines. Palencia, Oakland’s No. 12 prospect, is all about future potential; he signed out of Venezuela in 2020 and has only thrown 14.1 competitive innings as a pro. He has a huge arm, sitting 97–98 mph in extended spring games, and a plus curveball. Our Eric Longenhagen pegged his ETA at 2024 and put a 40+ Future Value grade on him, but let’s be real: there’s a lot of guesswork involved in forecasting someone with so short a track record.

Deichmann, the other player headed to Chicago, is Palencia’s opposite in nearly every way: He’s 26, a lefty, a hitter, and playing in Triple-A. His .880 OPS in Triple-A looks great … until you remember that it’s with the Las Vegas Aviators, who notably play in a hitter’s paradise, and that Deichmann has only gone deep four times all season despite obvious raw power. His calling card has always been that power, but he’s shown off a new trick this year: working the count and getting on base. His 19.2% walk rate is partially a product of altitude — you have to nibble more against someone with Deichmann’s pop when a fastball over the middle might carry for 500 feet — but it’s also a product of an improved eye. He whiffs as often as ever when he swings; he’s simply doing a better job recognizing when not to.

The A’s also got something they covet: cold, hard cash to help cover Chafin’s salary. For a team perpetually at the bottom of the payroll table, every last drop helps. That’s not enough to move the needle on the caliber of prospects sent out, but it’s essentially a sweetener; both teams agreed that Deichmann and Palencia were worth slightly more in trade than Chafin, so another adjustment had to be made.

This is a great deal for the Cubs if you think they should be selling. They acquired Chafin in exchange for Ronny Simon, a low-level prospect, last year. They got a solid season out of him in 2021. Now they’re getting two prospects with some chance of contributing to the majors; they’ll slot into the 10–20 range in Chicago’s farm system. That’s not a franchise-altering return, but it’s a nice get for a middle reliever on an expiring contract.

Oakland also knows what it’s doing when it comes to acquiring relievers. Chafin is a good fit for the A’s; he’ll push weaker arms down the leverage hierarchy and feed the infield grounder after grounder. The cost isn’t nothing, but the A’s do a good job of shuffling mid-level prospects while playing for now, and this seems like another chapter in that ongoing story.

Whether you think the Cubs should be selling is another story. Whether the A’s are a reliever away from the playoffs is up for debate. Both teams are set on their paths, and this seems like a great trade for both of their goals.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Clock
4 years ago

Chafin is a guy I feel like was already on the A’s, even though he wasn’t

Towel
4 years ago

Deichmanns overall OPS shouldn’t really matter. He’s a platoon only guy and he absolutely smacks and has more strikeouts than walks against RHP. He hits the ball as hard as he ever had, his swing is just extremely straightened out this season. There should be a happy medium between his contact and attack angle that brings more homeruns

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Towel

He’s a bit more of a project than your average 26-year old putting up a 128-wRC+ in AAA, that’s for sure. If he can figure out his swing he looks kind of like Kyle Schwarber, a bigger, slower, cannon-armed guy with a lot of power and platoon splits. The Cubs know what to do with that kind of guy. If not he’s probably a bench bat who hangs on for a few years until he runs out of options and/or hits a cold streak.

Towel
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Again. That 128 wrc+ is because he’s still facing LHP in AAA and that’s dragging down his line a lot. He’s not gonna be facing LHP in the majors.

His 344.487.517 and 19% k v 21% bb against RHP is all that anyone should be looking at. The only project is getting his attack angle raised a bit. But I’m pretty sure the cubs would be fine having him spray hard hit singles and doubles all over the field in the meantime.

A’s could have used him, that’s for sure.

Towel
4 years ago
Reply to  Ben Clemens

Right but it’s mostly a hitters paradise because of the thin air. Which Diechmanns current attack angle isn’t taking advantage of, despite his lofty EV numbers

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Ben Clemens

My understanding is that it is league-adjusted, but not park-adjusted. Is that not correct? If so it should be partly park corrected since between Las Vegas, Albuquerque, and I think Reno and Salt Lake a lot of teams have really favorable offensive environments. Not sure about the teams in Texas.

David Klein
4 years ago

He’d fit in with the A’s of the 70’s with that facial hair.

Original Greaser Bob
4 years ago

“Whether you think the Cubs should be selling is another story. ”

Are you seriously suggesting that they should be buyers? A game below .500 with 3 teams ahead of them for the the division and six teams back in the wildcard. That’s Trump level gaslighting.

MarkMember since 2017
4 years ago

Bob, I think he was referring to the overall Cub management strategy of selling off assets, starting with the Darvish/Caratini trade last winter. FanGraphs has lampooned that strategy with a gif of Montgomery Burns saying he has no money, and then getting deluged by a shower of greenbacks.

ascheffMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark

To be fair though, the consensus evaluation of that trade has shifted a lot since January. Darvish is one of the pitchers whose spin rate dropped the most with the sticky stuff crackdown, and since that time, his K/9 has dropped by more than 1 from his steady average over the last three seasons, and his ERA is an even 5. Meanwhile Davies has comfortably outperformed his FIP projections again (rough starts in April notwithstanding), and Preciado is posting a 161 wRC+ in a league where he’s two years younger than the average age.

There are a number of reasons why the Cubs have been a disappointment in 2021, but the Darvish for Davies and Preciado trade is not really one of them.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  ascheff

Possible–I think he was also hurt in the last month too. But even so, Yu Darvish couldn’t have saved them this year.

MoateMember since 2022
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think the biggest Cubs weakness is the extremely inconsistent AND mediocre offense. I don’t think Darvish was going to wrack up enough quality plate appearances to help them there…

Original Greaser Bob
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark

Oh I know what he’s insinuating. The Cubs knew it was the end of the line for the 2016 core and didn’t throw good money after bad. Instead they got the band back together to sell tickets and jerseys. But at some point these guys will have to understand that after alienating every possible fan base they won’t have jobs anymore, except for periodically writing for 538, or shilling for attention from the MLBPA. The politically motivated narratives here are absolute BS and sad trombone wrote a much more cohesive explanation of the 2021 Cubs roster than any of the site writers have even attempted. And don’t @ me Serbian to French back to Vietnamese.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

Yeah, the time for the Cubs to buy was a couple of years ago. In addition to the fact that they are 8.5 games back at the end of July*, they have a ton of players who if they don’t trade they’ll lose. 3/4ths of their infield is going to free agency, and their outfield consisted of a guy who might rebound (Happ), a guy who probably won’t (Heyward), and a guy who was going to be a FA (Pederson). Their starting rotation consists of one guy who could be good again (Hendricks), post-prospects who haven’t figured it out, and older guys who have lost it. Two of their elite relievers as of last week (Chafin and Tepera) are free agents too. Their third (Kimbrel) has a club option but he’s 33. So there is no today and there is no 2022 or 2023 with this crew, and of their Top 10 prospects five of them have ETAs of 2024 or 2025. (If you want to extend it to Top 15, another three prospects have ETAs from 2024-2026).

*I am not terribly bullish on the Yankees or Blue Jays either. The Blue Jays should probably focus on extending Ray and Matz and the Yankees should probably just manage their 40-man roster situation.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago

I can’t see Chafin making much of a difference over AJ Puk, Jesus Luzardo, or whomever in mid-leverage middle innings to actually trade any sort of real prospect to get him. Not to mention they’ve almost no chance at a division title. The only way this might make any sense is if they’re going to package Luzardo, Puk and other stuff for Kris Bryant and Javier Baez or something else ridiculously improbable. It seems pointless.

synco
4 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

Luzardo has been really bad, and Puk has been not great either. Chafin is a fairly standard career-year reliever type who gets traded for very little at the trade deadline, which is pretty much what happened here.

Also, I’m finding it hilarious that the spell checker just auto-corrected Luzardo to “lizard”.

SenorGato
4 years ago

This is an excellent trade by the Cubs. Nothing unexpected either in trading Pederson and Chafin, 2021 lives on

johansantana17Member since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  SenorGato

They need to go all out and trade everyone. Kimbrel, Bryant, Rizzo, Hendricks, Baez, Tepera, Contreras etc. Acquire a good mix of young MLB talent and higher lever prospects, sign a bunch of free agents in the offseason, come back with a similar team record wise in 2022 but much better set up for mid to long term success

diamonddores
4 years ago

Bassitt is an Akron guy and Chafin is a Kent St guy. Some Bay Area MACtion

mlbgrl21
4 years ago

Loved your title because it is so true, especially in recent years. It’s like a given! I think Chafin’s was a good choice (thanks for doing the research on his pitching repertoire for me, good overview to know what to be looking for). And I know this was written prior to the A’s other trades, but it was would’ve said anyway. It seems to be exactly another chapter in the same ongoing story. You hit the nail on the head in saying that they could have a great bullpen behind, what I believe to be a very underrated rotation. The rotation has really been very good, especially compared to recent years.

I’ll be honest. I didn’t watch much baseball in 2020 because 60 games is NOT a season. It cheapens the game IMO the same way expanding the postseason did/does (unless your idea of expansion is like mine in which they expand the number of games in both the Wild Card and the DS). So when I say recent years I mean prior to the pandemic with 2018 being the most shaky of rotations. Only Manaea actually started more than 20 games before going on the IL (DL?) until September of 2019. Treinen, Trivino & Petit carried the team on their backs until reinforcements were brought in at the Trade Deadline. 2019 was better rotation wise with what could be called a career year for Fiers and Brett Anderson stayed healthy for a full season since he was a rookie with A’s in 2009.

But, as you note, this year’s rotation has been solid & underrated, what’s odd is the lack of run support. I’m optimistic that the additions of Marte, Harrison and Gomes will help spark a lineup in which virtually every player proven their ability to hit. With the exception of Tony Kemp, who had never had the chance prior to joining the A’s, being stuck behind full infields & outfields in both Houston & Chicago. Looking at how well he’d performed in Triple-A I had a feeling that it wasn’t facing MLB pitching that had kept him from succeeding but simply the opportunity to get regular ABs. Harrison is a great complement to Kemp’s lefty bat and will be helpful given the loss of Chad Pinder and Gomes is an immense upgrade as backup backstop compared to Aramis Garcia, even if he doesn’t continue hitting as well as he has all year.

This year IS a bit different from the same old story that we are used to seeing with the A’s mainly due to the rotation, but when it comes to finding bullpen pitchers for mid-level prospects, it is exactly the same story. The A’s have no choice but to play for right now. And it is not as though the A’s had a farm system that was highly rated this year, especially at the higher levels, my guess is that there are players that we’ve yet to see enough of yet to know how good they are in the lower levels. It’s reminiscent of 2014 when the A’s traded Donaldson in Oct 2014. They didn’t want to have to try and pay what would be his inevitable arbitration raises, but in June of that year who had they taken as their first pick in the draft? Matt Chapman. That’s my guess at least and I’ve been watching Beane & Forst work for over 20 years.

The A’s wouldn’t give up prospects or players they know that they would really need. The always underrated team from Oakland has made the postseason more often than any team this century except the Yankees, Cardinals and Braves. Sure, after trading Donaldson we needed a couple of stopgap guys at third and like any team had a few rough years but only IMHO because Beane and Forst knew what – no who – would be coming. My apologies (if you have even read this far without getting tired of my rambling )for the lengthy comment, I do have a tendency to get off topic. Great read on Chafin and the A’s. I enjoyed it! Thanks!