Austin Jackson No Longer Cares For Ks

Austin Jackson has a fairly well-documented history of frequent strikeouts. But every day, Jackson seems to be creating a new history. That’s because he’s decided to stop striking out.

After signing out of high school, Jackson spent five seasons in the minors. He worked his way into 40 games with Gulf Coast League Yankees as an 18-year-old, and struck out in a relatively unnoticeable 15.2% of his plate appearances. Since then, he has struck out in at least 19.3% of his plate appearances in each season. His aggregate K% in his 4,276 PA from 2006 to 2012 was 23%. At the major-league level, from 2010 to2012, it was 24.7% — a number that only 17 qualified players could “beat.” After striking out in 21.5% of his PAs from ’06 to ’09, Jackson reached the majors. His adjustment period was rough. His two worst years at the dish from a strikeout perspective were his first two in the majors, as he struck out 25.2% of the time in his rookie season, and 27.1% of the time in 2011.

Nobody seemed to mind in 2010, though, because Jackson’s .396 batting average on balls in play — which is still the seventh-highest BABIP for a qualified player since 1947 — papered over a lot of problems. But when his K rate escalated even further in 2011, that’s when Jackson took action. Last season, in addition to other improvements, Jackson cut his strikeout rate more than 5% — not an insignificant mark. This season, Jackson has lopped off another 14%, down to 7.5% as of this morning.

If Jackson is able to maintain this drop in his K rate, it would be a pretty rare accomplishment. Last season, Jackson became one of just 177 qualified players who have lopped 5% or more off their K rate from one season to the next (since 1955). It’s not an easy thing to do. Those 177 players turned the trick 195 times. Fifteen of them did it at least twice, but most of those repeat performances don’t represent true progress. For instance, from 1987 to 1988, Paul Molitor lowered his K% from 14.4% to 8.9%. And from 1997 to 1998, he lowered his K% from 13.6% to 8.2%. That’s not what we’re potentially talking about with Jackson this season: We’re talking about a player lowering his K% by 5% or more in consecutive seasons. Since 1955, here’s the list of players who have done that (min. 500 PA per season):

Player Age Years Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Total Drop
Delino DeShields 22-24 1991-1993 26.8% 20.4% 13.3% 13.5%
Dick Allen 27-29 1969-1971 32.9% 25.7% 20.6% 12.3%
Frank Howard 30-32 1967-1969 29.9% 23.6% 16.2% 13.7%

That’s a pretty short list, and it doesn’t feature players who played recently. In addition, at this moment, Jackson would be crushing them. With his K% down to 7.5%, he’s nearly 20% down from where he was in 2011. If he maintains this pace, he’ll be basically be in uncharted territory.

And while it is still early, plate-discipline stats are among the quickest to stabilize. Swing percentage stabilizes around 50 PA, and contact rate between 70 and 100 PA. Jackson is one game shy of 70 PA right now, so the contact that Jackson is making may hold for the rest of the season. K-rate takes a little longer (150 PA), so it will still be some time before we can be super confident in Jackson’s newfound ability to avoid the strikeout. But if Jackson can maintain his contact rate, he’ll be setting himself up for success, at the least.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Still, this seems too good to be true. Right now, Jackson is only swinging and missing 2.7% of the time, a number that would put him in the top 20 since 2002 (which is as far back as we have that data). Ditto with his 92.3% contact rate. Certainly though, the markers are moving in his favor: Jackson is swinging at fewer pitches out of the strike zone, and at more pitches inside the strike zone, while keeping his swing percentage right in line with his career averages. That’s a recipe for success, and success is absolutely what he’s having right now.

Even if he does regress from where he is now, he is still in rarefied air. He has a great chance to be the fourth name on the above-mentioned list, and he also stands a good chance to join Mark Belanger (1968 to 1969), David Ortiz ( 2010 to 2011), Jimmy Wynn (1969 to 1970), Jason Thompson (1983 to 1984), Jeff Burroughs (1975 to 1976) and Willie McCovey (1967 to 1968) as the only qualified players since 1955 to drop their K% by 10% or more from one season to the next.

Last season, Dave Cameron wrote about his surprise that Jackson wasn’t listed on even one MVP ballot. If he maintains — or comes close to maintaining — his current ability to cut strikeouts out of his game, it’s going to be awfully hard to deny him MVP votes this season. What Jackson is doing is fairly unprecedented. That he has been able to change his game so drastically and find success at the same time — which as Dave pointed out the other day, is not easy — is nothing short of incredible.





Paul Swydan used to be the managing editor of The Hardball Times, a writer and editor for FanGraphs and a writer for Boston.com and The Boston Globe. Now, he owns The Silver Unicorn Bookstore, an independent bookstore in Acton, Mass. Follow him on Twitter @Swydan. Follow the store @SilUnicornActon.

38 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Sleight of Hand Pro
13 years ago

the last column is “cum drop” …. really? you couldnt think of a different abbreviation? youre killing me swydan.

Preston
13 years ago
Reply to  Paul Swydan

I’m so sad that I showed up after you changed it.

Johnhavok
13 years ago
Reply to  Paul Swydan

I started reading it and burst out laughing at work, made my day.

Now it’s dull and boring again. I demand you change it back!

joser
13 years ago
Reply to  Paul Swydan

?(drop) would work too if you’re trying to stay geeky and keep columns narrow.

joser
13 years ago
Reply to  joser

Or maybe not. We don’t support HTML character entities for greek letters here? Σ

McWisdom
13 years ago

Cum Drop

Ryan
13 years ago

You people have sick minds 🙂

Josh
13 years ago

Jackson is a G. (No offense Miguel, Prince, or Verlander)

John
13 years ago

Thank God I got a screengrab of that.

Jakerrr
13 years ago

I’ve never understood this about Pizza Cutter’s “stabilization” methodology.

The author compared even-numbered PAs to odd-numbered PAs. He didn’t compare first 50 PAs to next 50 PAs for example. He gives legitimate reasons for taking this approach but my problem is this:

When applying this data to the real world, you simply cannot say that a metric stabilizes at X PAs — because in reality we are always looking at a player’s FIRST X PAs, meaning consecutive PAs within a single season, which Pizza Cutter’s methodology didn’t evaluate. Not only that, but the author took 2-year data to ensure he had enough PAs.

That methodology is fine but then why does the sabre community always make statements like those made in this article: “Swing percentage stabilizes around 50 PA, and contact rate between 70 and 100 PA”.

No they don’t… at least not in the way that this article describes. Swing percentage stabilizes at 50 PAs consisting of every other PA (therefore 100 total PAs) compared to 50 PAs inbetween. And of course, comparing PAs in this way introduces far more stability than comparing 2 groups of consecutive PAs, since certain factors are being held constant (often the same pitcher on the mound, weather, ballpark, defense and so on).

It’s interesting data but it cannot be practically applied in the way that it’s routinely touted.

Jason B
13 years ago
Reply to  Jakerrr

That was a really well-said, well-thought-out comment; genuinely appreciate it, Jake. Would be interested to see if it merits a response or discussion from any of the authors who cite K-rate stabilization rates.

Johnny Come Lately
13 years ago

“Jackson is only swinging and missing 2.7% of the time, a number that would put him in the top 20 since 2002 (which is as far back as we have that data). Ditto with his 92.3% contact rate.”

Can anyone explain to me how you can have swing and miss 2.7% of the time but only have a 92.3% contact rate? Shouldn’t these two numbers add up to 100%? What am I missing? Thanks in advance.

Florko
13 years ago

foul balls dont count towards contact rate but do count toward swing and miss? maybe?

Ryan
13 years ago

The denominator for SwStr% is all pitches (seen by that batter).

The denominator for contact% is all pitches swung at.

Johnny Come Lately
13 years ago
Reply to  Ryan

Thanks Ryan.

Jakerrr
13 years ago

I believe that foul tips are counted as swinging strikes but not as contact.

Dirck
13 years ago

I traded Miley and Maybin for Jackson just before the season started . I’m feeling pretty good about that trade now .

davisncMember since 2016
13 years ago
Reply to  Dirck

Interesting and relevant! Cool story!

Sleight of Hand Pro
13 years ago
Reply to  Dirck

nobody cares.

Bret
13 years ago

If there’s one thing worse than people talking about fantasy ball on Fangraphs comments, it’s the people who needlessly ream them for it.

There’s no need for all the attitude.

Sleight of Hand Pro
13 years ago
Reply to  Bret

you and i have different versions of “attitude”

Natman
13 years ago
Reply to  Bret

I vote for Natitude

M Hedberg
13 years ago
Reply to  Bret

That is track five…it is called “attitude”.

Hurtlockertwo
13 years ago

Jackson gave all his K’s to Rick Ankiel

Rick Ankiel
13 years ago

All your K’s are belong to us!

The Party Bird
13 years ago

Jackson’s elite BABIP skills and 20 homer power coupled with this potential improvement in K rate? Yikes. If this contact improvement isn’t noise, he’s got to be the most likely to have a .400 season of anyone playing now.

deafdumbandblindkid
13 years ago

…basically, he’s got a realistic shot at having what tigers fans long ago hoped would be ron leflore’s career. only better.

Dave Dombrowski
13 years ago

Will the Curtis Granderson for Austin Jackson AND Max Scherzer, Phil Coke, (and) Daniel Schlereth trade come up as best trade of the decade in 2020?

Dave Dombrowski
13 years ago

in the article written in 2020.

James
13 years ago

Well of course, he would strike out four times the day this article would be written.

Jon L.Member since 2016
13 years ago
Reply to  James

Lifting his 2013 strikeout rate from 7.5% to 12.2%! Maybe Austin and the Tigers just hadn’t faced many pitchers like Felix, Felix, Capps and Furbush.

hp
13 years ago

what’s confusing to me is that Jackson seemed to be striking out 3 times a game in the spring (swag) especially in the last 2 weeks before the season. Further evidence that spring stats doesnt matter?

Grant
13 years ago
Reply to  hp

Yup.

ron paul
13 years ago

No mention of the change in his approach at the plate starting in the spring of 2012…? What about the fact he stopped using a major legkick last year? I really like the use of statistics, but numbers without context or reasoning results in a lacking article.

Tedd
13 years ago

AJ is now batting .272 and striking out more than once a game..He’s back to being a strikeout king…It was only a matter of time before he showed his true colours…That trade for Coke and AJ isn’t looking very good right now is it?..I’d rather have Granderson who will have a superior career.

Tedd
13 years ago
Reply to  Tedd

slight exaggeration..He has 33 SO’s in 34 games…It’s gonna get worse,trust me.

Dick Allen
13 years ago

I heard you boys talkin bout me. Austin Jackson ain`t got shit