Your Stance On the Team Projections (National League)
And we’re back for the second half of this polling project. If you missed the first half, which was dedicated to the American League, here you go. The idea, in short, is just to gauge community opinion of the team projections, which as of Monday are now updated to include ZiPS, instead of just being based on Steamer like before. What we all see now should be awful close to what we see on the eve of opening day, and so, with that in mind, here’s the projected National League:
Team | W | L |
Cubs | 97 | 65 |
Dodgers | 94 | 68 |
Mets | 90 | 72 |
Nationals | 90 | 72 |
Giants | 87 | 75 |
Cardinals | 85 | 77 |
Pirates | 84 | 78 |
Marlins | 81 | 81 |
Diamondbacks | 80 | 82 |
Padres | 73 | 89 |
Rockies | 72 | 90 |
Brewers | 71 | 91 |
Reds | 70 | 92 |
Braves | 68 | 94 |
Phillies | 64 | 98 |
The NL projections haven’t been as controversial as the AL projections. On the AL side, we’ve had to talk entirely too much about the Royals, and we’ve also had teams like the Red Sox go off the rails. The NL has behaved more predictably of late, but that doesn’t mean you might not still disagree with some of the projections in that table. Teams are predictable until they aren’t, and this is the whole reason behind the project. I just want to know where you think the numbers are good, and I want to know where you think the numbers are being stupid.
A request, again: when voting below, please try to consider only the information we have at this moment. You can assume that some prospects will or will not eventually show up, but don’t dock certain teams because you think they’ll subtract at the deadline, and don’t boost other teams for expected trade additions. I’m interested in what you think of the teams as we speak. Maybe you just haven’t thought that much about the expected cellar-dwellers, but don’t worry, you can’t actually get this wrong. Once more, thanks for all the help. We’ll analyze all this stuff later in the week.