Bartlett on the Market

With the Tampa Bay Rays facing a budget crunch and possessing a home-grown prospect (Reid Brignac) capable of similar production at a fraction of the cost, shortstop Jason Bartlett figures to open the 2011 season in a new city. It’s possible that the Rays non-tender the 31-year-old, but it’s more likely that Tampa finds a trade partner. Bartlett’s name has been tied at various times to the Orioles, Nationals, Giants, Cardinals and Padres. What sort of trade value does Bartlett have?

The former Padres prospect and Twin is entering his final year of arbitration eligibility, meaning that he’ll become a free agent after the 2011 season. Bartlett pulled down $4 million in arbitration last year, and he figures to top a $5 million salary next season. According to the reverse-engineered Elias rankings offered on MLBTradeRumors, Bartlett currently ranks as a Type A free agent. He’s close to the border between Type A and Type B status, though, and it’s anyone’s guess how the draft pick compensation system will be addressed in Major League Baseball’s next collective bargaining agreement (the current CBA expires after the 2011 season).

Offensively, Bartlett has been around average during his major league career. He’s got a .281/.345/.385 line, with a .328 wOBA and a park and league-adjusted wOBA that’s two percent better than the average batter (102 wRC+). Outside of a 2009 season when he morphed into Nomar Garciaparra at the plate and benefited from a batting average on balls in play north of .360, Bartlett’s been a low-power player with decent plate discipline. He’s not a hacker, but with the worst outcome usually being a single when a pitcher puts one over the plate against him, Bartlett gets challenged often.

Here are his outside swing percentages and his percentage of pitches seen within the strike zone. To provide greater context, I also added a column that shows Bartlett’s rates as a percentage of the MLB average for a given year. For example, Bartlett swung at 24.4 percent of pitches thrown out of the zone in 2010, while the MLB average was 29.3. Bartlett’s O-Swing was 83 percent of the big league average (24.4 divided by 29.3).

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The high zone percentages explain his modest 7.7% career walk rate. There’s a good chance that Bartlett’s an average overall hitter again in 2011. CHONE’s late August update had Bartlett as an exactly average batsman in a neutral hitting environment, while Dan Szymborski’s brand spankin’ new ZiPS projection has him slightly below that level. A shortstop who can produce at a league-average clip at the plate has value, assuming he can cut it in the field.

That’s where things get murky for Bartlett. Early in his career, Bartlett rated extremely well by Ultimate Zone Rating and was well above-average by Sean Smith’s Total Zone. In recent years, though, Bartlett’s advanced fielding stats have slipped considerably. In 2009, he had a -6.9 UZR/150, and this past year, Bartlett rated as -13.8 runs below average per 150 defensive games. That was dead last among qualified players at the position. The Fans Scouting Report also shows Bartlett losing ground in terms of instincts, first step quickness and speed, among other things.

I don’t want to get sucked into the trap of just assuming that Bartlett has totally lost whatever fielding prowess he had. Just as his fantastic early career numbers shouldn’t have been taken as gospel that Bartlett was a perennial Gold Glover, his recent work likely doesn’t mean he has turned into a Yuniesky Betancourt clone. Overall, UZR has Bartlett as a +4.5 run defender at shortstop per 150 defensive games. I seriously doubt he’s that sort of defender right now, but he’s not going to be a -14 run fielder, either.

Taking a three-year average of his numbers and weighing recent performance more heavily, I get a -7 or -8 run defensive value for Bartlett. If you think Bartlett’s a -7.5 run shortstop with average offense, then he’s roughly a two WAR player — maybe a little less when you consider durability concerns (according to the Baseball Injury Tool, he hit the DL with a knee sprain in 2008, an ankle sprain in 2009 and a pulled hamstring in 2010).

Basically, how teams value Bartlett comes down to his defense. A team that feels Bartlett has lost range and isn’t a good bet to stay healthy all year could value him as a 1.75 to 2 WAR player. A team that thinks he’s still a decent shortstop might lean more toward a 2.5 WAR forecast.

The market for shortstops isn’t exactly robust, and even with a salary bump in arbitration, Bartlett figures to be worth more than he’s paid. But not by much. Given the questions surrounding Bartlett’s defense, and the fact that teams know the Rays have little use for him, don’t expect Tampa to land more than a B-level prospect for Bartlett.





A recent graduate of Duquesne University, David Golebiewski is a contributing writer for Fangraphs, The Pittsburgh Sports Report and Baseball Analytics. His work for Inside Edge Scouting Services has appeared on ESPN.com and Yahoo.com, and he was a fantasy baseball columnist for Rotoworld from 2009-2010. He recently contributed an article on Mike Stanton's slugging to The Hardball Times Annual 2012. Contact David at david.golebiewski@gmail.com and check out his work at Journalist For Hire.

30 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Danmay
15 years ago

Thank you for providing league average rates, I appreciate it a lot.

Big JgkeMember since 2020
15 years ago

Overvalue a mediocre infielder? That sounds like a job for Super Sabean!!!

Brad
15 years ago
Reply to  Big Jgke

“Overvalue a mediocre infielder? That sounds like a job for Super Sabean!!!”

Of course, now that “Super Sabean” has brought a championship to the Giants, such comments are sort of pathetic in their own little way.

I will be the first to say that Sabean is hardly a perfect GM, but he is certainly not a horrid one and he certainly does not deserve the vitriol that is often spewed by those who seem to hate him no matter what the guy does.

Big JgkeMember since 2020
15 years ago
Reply to  Brad

Like characters in a Greek tragedy some of us are doomed to a destiny no matter what successes or failures we achieve in the meantime. Sabean, alas, is doomed to overvalue mediocrity in aging middle infielders.

Brad
15 years ago
Reply to  Brad

As much as I don’t like it, I can at least agree with you on that!

Schu
15 years ago
Reply to  Brad

No, he really is horrid. They got lucky with a single draft pick: Tim Lincecum, and that got them a ring.

Locke
15 years ago
Reply to  Brad

He got so lucky it’s ridiculous. Sabean is a certified ignoramus.

Brad
15 years ago
Reply to  Brad

Assigning only blame to a manager for his mistakes while not equally acknowledging his successes seems highly dubious to me…but hey, in the end, it doesn’t matter but it does bug me when people do not actually entertain balanced (i.e reasonable) perspectives! 🙂

Sabean is no Maddon, but neither is he a Fregosi lol.

Jack
15 years ago
Reply to  Brad

So, Schu the only good draft pick Sabean’s ever made was Lincecum? So Cain, Bumgarner, Posey, Sanchez, and Wilson just magically appeared? Sabean is awful at conducting big deals (Rowand and Zito) but he has a great draft track record (he wasted some draft picks in signing Type A free agents, but the ones he’s had he’s done quite well) and has done well on small, bottom of the barrel pickups, (Huff, Torres, Burrell) While Sabean does do a lot of things badly, he is good at drafting and low price additions, so to say he is horrid is idiotic.

NBarnes
15 years ago
Reply to  Brad

Ah, results-based analysis. How I wish I could quit (seeing) you!

quincy0191
15 years ago
Reply to  Brad

Considering baseball isn’t math, a results-based analysis is probably the best way to go. There is no objective reason why one process succeeds more than another, so we should emphasize processes that tend to succeed, and the only way to evaluate them in that sense is by looking at the results. Incorporate logic as much as you want and can, but if the logical way isn’t working, perhaps it’s because player evaluation isn’t inherently logical. “Perfect” mechanics often produce terrible players, and “dangerous” mechanics often produce successful players.

Hell, any person who values statistics is participating in results-based analysis; we’re looking at what a player’s done in the past (results) and trying to predict what he’ll do in the future by evaluating how well he did. FanGraphs emphasizes results-based analysis.

But the above assessment of Sabean is solid: he’s a good drafter (though John Barr and Dick Tidrow deserve a lot of that credit; the Giants’ drafts have been highly successful since Barr showed up and Tidrow’s work with young pitchers has been invaluable), he makes good low-cost moves, but hand him $20M and he’ll give it to the worst possible player. The 2010 strategy of “grab everyone cheap and see who sticks” was very effective because it played to Sabean’s strengths and prevented him from hurting the team by acquiring an expensive player that would preclude him from acquiring another player. But a good GM needs to be able to dole out the big dollars to the right people, and Sabean’s inability to do that will prevent him from ever being a good GM. If he plays to his strengths (something he hasn’t been doing until recently), he’s adequate, and luck can take him to successful, but until he shows the ability to make intelligent big-money decisions he won’t ever be a good GM.

R M
15 years ago

Maybe I’m being pessimistic, but it seems like it would be a miracle if Brignac matched Bartlett’s production next year. He swung at 42% of pitches of the plate last year….there’s no way his career 86 wrc+ is going up unless he suddenly learns a little bit of pitch recognition.

Sandy Kazmir
15 years ago
Reply to  R M

Conservatively, he’s a +5 defender, which makes up at least 10 runs of offense and is at least league average against righties. I was ready to play him (and trade Bartlett) going into last off-season.

R M
15 years ago
Reply to  Sandy Kazmir

Really? What source? I don’t know anything about his defense based on Fangraphs, that’s why I didn’t mention it.

ben
15 years ago
Reply to  Sandy Kazmir

RM-
Scouting reports that rave about his glove, and like SandyKaz I watched >120 Rays games last year and there is little doubt Brignac is a much better fielder than Bartlett. Brignac has great lateral movement, turns the double play well (stays on the bag a little long though), and has an accurate arm. It’s nice to see a guy who was always ragged on for his defensive ability turn it around so quickly by working his tail off.

dondbaseball
15 years ago

David, Great article but I am curious with the fact that the GG just came out and Jeter was derided as “the worst defensive shortstop” according to metrics, am I missing something? I have read numerous places about Betancourt being absolutely the worst, but this is the first I am hearing about Bartlett. As the NY talks get uglier and I do think Jeter will smell the coffee that no-one will come close to the $45 mil, a trade to the Yankees for Bartlett could work, particularly for a catcher as the Yanks seem to be in abundance.

bender
15 years ago

Chances are high that Bartlett loses his Type A-ness anyhow given that his monster 2009 will no longer be in his “last two years” that are considered for compensation type

giantsrainman
15 years ago

Would a reliever like Cris Ray be enough? Seems to me it should be.

WillieMaysField
15 years ago
Reply to  giantsrainman

Ray’s a non-tender canidate and the Rays would want a little more.

Sasha Grey
15 years ago
Reply to  giantsrainman

lol@(imposter) even GRM isn’t that dumb.

Kinsm
15 years ago
Reply to  giantsrainman

Dan Runzler?

zenbitz
15 years ago

who has more trade value, Bartlett or JJ Hardy?

David
15 years ago
Reply to  zenbitz

Hardy for sure. he’s slightly cheaper, slightly younger, a better defender, and the Twins are in a better bargaining position. Bartlett’s advantage is that he’ll probably get you draft picks next offseason, but then again you’d have to assume you can offer him arbitration and he’ll decline. if he has another 700 OPS / bad defense year, he’d probably accept arbitration and take the $10 million for 2012, which isn’t exactly a good deal.

the difference isn’t enormous – I’d say Bartlett is worth a decent bullpen arm, Hardy a better bullpen arm + a minor prospect.

Brock Schweim
15 years ago

Even if a handful know it, there’s a wide gap when it comes to composition between traditional and internet based article promotion. An article’s worth is evaluated by readership in terms of whether or not it’s simple to understand. Consequently an intelligent point should be to make it simple and specific.

meego tablet news
14 years ago

Very interesting topic , appreciate it for putting up. comments by Rhea Siske @ The post is mentioned in the email from Lou Parkey @ <a href=??ttp://www.meegotabletnews.com/??meego tablet news

Alejandro Rysanek
14 years ago

I believe this web site holds very good pent subject material articles . comments by Nathan Agerter @ This post is mentioned in the email from Nolan Dearring @ <a href=??ttp://www.androidcloudapp.com/??android cloud app

Francesco Ruger
14 years ago

I think this web site contains some real wonderful info for everyone : D. comments by Heriberto Hollo @ This article is mentioned in the email from Troy Olup @ <a href=??ttp://www.playbookfanclub.com/??playbook fan club