Baseball Hunkers Down
Yesterday, Major League Baseball delayed the start of the regular season. The decision, in retrospect, was an easy one: every major sport is now shut down. It’s a public safety concern in addition to a player safety issue, and the combination made it impossible to wait. Opening Day has been postponed by at least two weeks, and May might be a more realistic start date.
In their understandable haste to delay the season, MLB left some loose ends. Today, they’ve started to address those. Yesterday, players were simply waiting at team facilities, unsure of next steps. Some spring training games were played even after the announcement that the season would be delayed indefinitely. Teams had no games, but there was no official announcement of what their players would do.
Today, the league eliminated the confusion. Spring training facilities league-wide will be shuttered by mutual agreement of the commissioner and the player’s union:
https://t.co/VTXLnDTZsH spring training facilities shut, players allowed to return home means it is going to be quite a while until MLB games are played.
— Joel Sherman (@Joelsherman1) March 13, 2020
Shuttered means exactly what you think it does. No one is going to be playing baseball at spring training facilities in the near future. All on-field training is shut down — no intra-squad games, no outfield practice, no simulated games. Pitchers can throw off of mounds, and hitters can still work in indoor cages, but with no games, the baseball season won’t restart seamlessly.
A second spring training looks like the most likely option at this point. It could be short — 10 days or so — but it seems unavoidable that players will need another round of warmups before the season can start. That tracks with what we’ve heard about a further delay — if play isn’t going to start up again until May or potentially later, a second spring training would be necessary in either case, so this seems like a wise decision.
With players and the league no longer ramping up for the season, other dominos fell as well. The league recommended that teams send home players who aren’t on 40-man rosters. Players on the roster can leave as well if they’d prefer. Players on the 40-man will be eligible for travel reimbursement:
Per a memo sent out by the MLBPA, teams are expected to help with/reimburse travel arrangements for players who decide to leave Arizona or Florida. As @MarcCarig said, this applies only for players on 40-man rosters.
— Dennis Lin (@dennistlin) March 13, 2020
If those players decide to stay, as the Yankees already have, teams have them covered. Daily allowances will continue, and teams will help remaining players secure lodging:
1/Further from PA memo: For players who stay in the area of the Spring facility, regular Spring Training allowances will continue. If a player needs to extend a lease of find hotel accommodations, Clubs will be expected to assist in that effort,
— Joel Sherman (@Joelsherman1) March 13, 2020
The vast majority of minor leaguers will likely be asked to leave camp, but will find themselves in a difficult situation, as they won’t be reimbursed for travel at a time when traveling is a fraught proposition. With minor leaguers only receiving pay during the season, the economic pressures are mounting for baseball’s working class.
In theory, that pressure could soon extend to major leaguers. The uniform player contract, the basis of every major league contract, has special provisions for a national state of emergency, which was declared today:
With a national state of emergency now declared, the commissioner can now suspend contracts while games aren’t being played, per the uniform players’ contract.
— Marc Carig (@MarcCarig) March 13, 2020
At this stage, it looks unlikely that the commissioner’s office is considering so drastic a step. NBA contracts have a similar clause, and teams in that league are continuing to pay players as normal. There have been no rumblings yet of baseball breaking ranks. In fact, the Tigers committed to paying stadium employees for at least the month of April regardless of whether games have played.
Finally, sources close to the league say that at the moment, the plan is to extend the regular season rather than reduce the number of games played:
Sam Kennedy: The current thinking is that MLB games missed before the schedule starts will be added on at the end of these season. Subject to change, but means the regular season would be pushed into October
— Jen McCaffrey (@jcmccaffrey) March 13, 2020
That’s an acceptable solution assuming the league’s current timeline, which only calls for two missed weeks of baseball. The last game of the World Series was played on October 30 this year; by cutting seven off days and moving the postseason back a week, the league could produce a 162-game schedule and still end the playoffs by around November 5, in line with when the playoffs ended earlier this century.
Of course, nothing else about the current plan indicates much confidence in that two week delay. Instead, we’ll likely see a combination of a shorter season and a later start to the playoffs. If games start on May 1 and end on October 4, that leaves 156 days for games. The regular schedule would call for 162 games in 185 days; a 140 or 142-game schedule in 156 days would keep player rest somewhat constant while maximizing the number of games played.
And of course, all of this is extremely prone to change. The spread of COVID-19 has been anything but predictable; baseball’s response thus far has been similarly unsettled. We won’t know more for weeks, but as of now, it looks like the league is preparing for at least a month without baseball.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
This is really developing rapidly. Here in Alabama we have one confirmed case in Montgomery — about 4 hours south of me here in Huntsville. Schools are scheduled to close statewide beginning this coming Wednesday, and all rec sports have been cancelled.
The grocery store situation is unbelievable. No paper products, no cleaning supplies. I’ve been debating on whether I should fill up vehicles and jugs with gas, or if I should go ahead and withdrawal some cash. It’s getting crazy here, and we’re one of the last states to report an infection.
I’m wondering how this is all going to work, considering I have 2 kids who will have no where to go for at least the next 14-17 days. Are our employers just going to let us all off work??
Nobody knows how to handle it. The last pandemic was 1957-58, and it was more mild.
People run out of steam panic buying. My wife has laid in an unbelievable amount of stuff. So we won’t be at the stores except for perishables. I suspect the panic buying will die down in a week or so.
I would make sure you keep all your medicines on hand. I paid out of my pocket for another 3 months over and above what I had.
I have found if you get to the store at 7 am when it opens it’s pretty quiet
I’m beginning to worry about medicine. I have a monthly prescription that I’m supposed to be getting refilled Tuesday. A bit anxious, considering I have to take it and can’t go a day without it (without feeling horrible).
Last night my state went from having just one infected person to 5, including one living in my county.
If you can afford it, order an extra supply when you are at pharmacist ( they may need to get your doctor to agree ). Mine wasn’t covered by insurance but the CVs phaarmacist found a way to chefs me 60 bucks for something that was going to cost 250.
Remember you are only limited on how much to buy by insurance – if you can afford it buy more
It appears this is just the beginning. Now that testing should start ramping up soon the numbers are probably going to surge. I want to know what we’re supposed to do now that our kids have no school
For real though. Why do you keep calling it ‘Wuhan Virus’ in multiple comment threads?
But for real, do you actually care what other people call it?
The first time I ever heard of it, the reporters were calling it the Wuhan Virus.
Referring to that by that name is more or less making a political comment. Given my position that requires no public political activity, I cannot comment further.
Okay. If you say so. But your position seems silly. Viruses have been named after the area they arose for decades.
Zika Virus, West Nile, Ebola, Lyme Disease, German Measles, Coxsackie Virus, Spanish Flu…
Are you sure you are not just falling into the current trend of viewing every damn thing as political?
This was called Wuhan Virus for weeks. I am not sure what changed. But if it really bothers people that much I will call it COVID19, seemingly the current non political name.
That’s fine. Viruses have been named after locations for over a century. This one, however, is normally called something else. I have never heard it called Wuhan virus anywhere other than your posts. If it is commonly called Wuhan virus, I have no problem with that.
MERS is the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.
Why is MERS okay, but Wuhan Virus apparently gets people upset?
Did you complain about MERS in 2012-13?
Spanish Flu didn’t come from Spain, but did account for xenophobic violence in America in the aftermath. Lyme, being a city, does not implicate an entire people/country. Words matter because precisely because we CAN choose to be specific and accurate or not. It’s one thing to make a mistake; it’s another not to care
Since I now see that it matters I am onboard with calling it COVID19.
Will you agree with me that the same rule should apply to the Ebola and West Nile viruses? If not, why?
The 1918 influenza pandemic did not arise in Spain. Spain was simply more forthcoming about the number of cases, since they were neutral in World War I, and had no reason to censor local news.
There is some evidence that the 1918 influenza actually originated in Kansas.
The first time I ever heard of it, the reporters were calling it the Wuhan Virus.
_____
I’d say this is an indication of how narrow your choice of news sources is and/ or how out-of-touch you now are with COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2. Via Google Trends, the term (quotes included as part of the search to include only a full match of the phrase) “wuhan virus” only really ever had use from Jan 19 to Feb 8. Checking the sources on the ‘2019–20 coronavirus pandemic’ Wikipedia page shows that (as of the time of this comment) only 7 of the 710 sources use the phrase term ‘Wuhan Virus’ and the most recent of which was written on February 2nd.
Google Trends Query: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=%22wuhan%20virus%22&geo=US
Wiki Page References: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic#cite_note-first_case-1
In the month since then — and even moreso since the official terms “COVID-19” (for the disease) and “SARS-CoV-2” (the virus) came out ca Feb 11 (https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/coronavirus-gets-official-name-who-covid-19-n1134756)
Alluding the user cavebird’s statement how the term “Wuhan Virus” reflects a political comment, the WHO made a public comment back in February that its official name was chosen explicitly to avoid referring to anything:
“We had to find a name that did not refer to a geographical location, an animal, or an individual or group of people,” WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in a call with reporters.”
Wait, so… the league recommends sending the players home that are not on the 40-man roster (no choice in the matter) WITHOUT travel reimbursement. And those that that are on the 40-man roster are not required to leave, but can if they want and receive travel reimbursement. Doesn’t that seem backwards (especially considering the salaries of most that are not on the 40-man roster comparatively to those that are)?
The idea of having them leave seems crazy to me. If they do have it, you are just spreading it across the country/internationally. If they don’t, you are just sending them home to get it. They are currently in a relatively controlled environment. I have no idea why changing that is a good idea.
That’s a good point and one I personally hadn’t thought of.
They get travel reimbursement when they are on the 40 man because they have a union to negotiate that for them.
Minor leaguers remain screwed as always.
What is stopping minor leaguers from creating a union?
Fear, lack of support from the MLBPA, lack of support from the US government, and a system in which the top prospects are generally receiving significant signing bonuses through the draft or IFA and therefore have less incentive to unionize.
The top prospects who don’t come from money or have bonuses are afraid to blow their chance at MLB money by joining a minor league union. And it’s harder for a minor league union to get off the ground without a good number of top prospects to create leverage.
Non top prospects have the most incentive to unionize, but the least leverage individually and the greatest replacement risk. They would likely need some the the best (most valuable) prospects to join a perspective union to get MLB to the bargaining table.
That the MLB is looking to contract some minor league teams is a warning about the precarious position most minor leaguers are in and only fuels the fear that the players are expendable should they try and unionize.
While I understand the union/non-union situation, these are unusual times.
Didn’t ask his name, but I had a couple Astro players on my flight yesterday
The talk of the season starting May 1st seems absolutely crazy to me. I would say at the very earliest it would be July. We are supposed to see peak numbers in May (75-150 million) with it quickly slowing after that. A much better chance there is no season at all than the season starting in May.
The governor of Illinois has banned all gatherings of 1000 people till May 1st. So if the White Sox or Cubs play home games before that, it will be in empty stadiums.
The mayor of Chicago requested that all gatherings of 250 people or more be delayed 30 days. They have not completely banned them (yet), but I wonder how many people it takes to put on and broadcast an MLB game even in an empty stadium.
I agree with you Carter. Everyone in all walks of life is being totally unrealistic about what we are in for. There’s a much greater chance that there will be no baseball season at all than that it will start May 1.
CDC just announced May 15th is the earliest public gatherings can happen. There is no chance of May 1st now, with May 15th being the earliest starting date. But that is also 0% chance.
It’s not happening until July 4 at the earliest