Billy Hamilton, As Advertised
Monday, against the Twins, Billy Hamilton stole four bases. In so doing, he reached 40 steals on the year before anyone else reached 30. Probably even more impressive: Hamilton now has more steals than exactly half the teams in baseball. He has more than the White Sox and Dodgers combined. Over the course of the past month, Hamilton has stolen 20 bases, and second and third place on the leaderboard combined have stolen 19 bases. Over that same month, Hamilton has more stolen bases than he has hits.
It’s funny now to reflect on some of the things I wrote in 2014. Early on, when Hamilton started to hit, I decided he wasn’t a caricature. When it all ended, I asked why Hamilton hadn’t been a base-stealing dynamo. Now Hamilton is a base-stealing dynamo. And he’s a terrible hitter. He can’t hit, but he does run, and when he’s on the other side of things, he can play a mean center field. Which means, in a way, Billy Hamilton now is something of a caricature. He’s an exaggeration of a player type, which is exactly how he was advertised.
Last year, I think, we all achieved a little Hamilton fatigue. It was his first full year, and in some senses it underwhelmed, and there was a lot written already during his 2013 cup of coffee. But if you’re still fatigued, that’s your own fault. Hamilton has gone full oddity, full anomaly, having learned a thing or two from his long rookie season. Pitchers have mostly learned how to get him out, but when they fail, Hamilton has mostly learned to take full advantage.
Here’s one of those stolen bases from Monday:
Everything happened fast. Hamilton ran fast. The pitcher delivered fast. The catcher delivered fast. Hamilton arrived safely, in under 3.1 seconds from first move. Here’s another of the stolen bases, right on the heels of a different steal:
From first move, Hamilton arrived in under 3 seconds. Given the math, that makes him almost impossible to throw out. Yet the throw beat him by a hair — and still Hamilton was safe. The Twins did just about everything perfectly, but Hamilton got his bag. When stealing third this year, Hamilton is 12 out of 12.
You’d be hard-pressed to find a worse regular hitter in baseball than Billy Hamilton. To this point, Statcast has only confirmed what we already suspected — Hamilton doesn’t hit the ball hard, and he puts way too many of them in the air. For Hamilton, a fly ball is just about an automatic out. And you can’t expect Hamilton to draw too many walks when pitchers know they can go right after him in the zone. But to Hamilton’s credit, he made a very smooth transition into playing center field. And now the baserunning is there, like we expected it to be. A season ago, there was a lot of running, but also plenty of mistakes. Those same mistakes now are harder to find.
It’s not that Hamilton is any faster — it’s that he’s improved his situational awareness. He has a better idea, now, when to steal. He exercises a bit more patience. He better understands what’s going on around him. He has better reads of the pitchers. Paul Goldschmidt is a good example of what you can accomplish on the basepaths just by being smart and aware. Hamilton shows what happens when you combine those smarts with instincts and an impossible first step.
When stealing bases, Hamilton has improved his success rate from 71% to 87%. Last year, he was picked off eight times; this year, he’s been picked off just two times. Last year, also, Hamilton was thrown out three times trying to score. This year he has yet to make a single out on the bases that wasn’t part of a steal attempt. Hamilton’s starting to look like a nearly-perfect baserunner. When, you know, he’s given the opportunity to base-run.
So Hamilton’s already at +10 runs on the bases this year, with the Reds having played 75 games. Since 2002, the best individual baserunning-value mark is +14.1 runs, by 2012 Mike Trout and 2008 Willy Taveras. Hamilton’s closing in on that in advance of the All-Star Game, and he’s also done well in the outfield. I want to show you something fun, that I think highlights the way Hamilton is exceptional. What is he? A bad hitter, and a good runner and defender. So here’s a plot, showing qualified 2015 hitters. On the x-axis, pure batting value. On the y-axis, combined baserunning and defensive value.
Hamilton is there, all by himself. He has baseball’s highest combined baserunning and defensive value. A little behind is Kevin Kiermaier, but Kiermaier can hit. Further behind is Lorenzo Cain, but Cain can hit. Ditto A.J. Pollock. Hamilton doesn’t quite hit like a pitcher, but he does hit like one of those pitchers we call good hitters, relative to other pitchers.
Let’s take it all the way back to 2002. We’ll look at the same plot, for all qualified hitter seasons, including the partial 2015, so we can see where Hamilton stands at the moment.
Hold on a second:
That’s better.
Hamilton isn’t all by himself, but he’s clearly toward the fringes, and, again, his team’s season isn’t even half over yet. So he could get only more extreme. He probably won’t have the worst batting season in the sample. In 2002, Neifi Perez was worth -44 batting runs. In 2006, Clint Barmes was worth -43. But, consider this: Hamilton is at +22.9, in combined baserunning and defense. The biggest number in the pool is +35.5. So that’s within reach. And, in terms of the difference between batting value and combined baserunning and defense, Hamilton has a current gap of 37.4 runs. The biggest such gap in the pool (in the same direction) is 62.9 runs. That belongs to 2013 Alcides Escobar, who finished with a 49 wRC+. He was a perfect 22 out of 22 on steals.
By the end of this season, Hamilton could remove himself from the pack. It would require that he keep not hitting, and maybe that’s a stretch, since the Rangers are thinking about sitting Leonys Martin, who’s also not hitting. But Hamilton does that other stuff, and the Reds are unlikely to give up on him in this kind of year. They know he’s not hitting, but they also know his feet allow him to maximize the times he does get on base. You could think of it as increasing Hamilton’s “effective” slugging percentage. And there’s the defense. The defense and the baserunning are unlikely to go away. Which gives us Billy Hamilton, maybe the game’s weirdest everyday player.
People used to wonder how bad a hitter Andrelton Simmons could afford to be, given what he can do as a shortstop. Hamilton is sort of the same idea in practice. He’s really a very bad hitter, but he establishes such a high floor with his range and his legs that it seems like he’s still worth playing almost every day. Maybe you don’t agree with the WAR calculation. Maybe you simply can’t buy that a hitter as bad as Hamilton can still be valuable. But we can agree on this: if any player this bad at hitting can still be valuable, it’s this player. This one solitary freak.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.



Obviously it would help if he changed his swing so that he hit more balls on the ground. It wouldn’t help a lot, of course, because most groundballs are outs, but it should help a little since he’d be forcing the fielders to actually throw him out and they’ll have to be fast and smooth to do so, which should lead to a few more hits (or at least reached-on-errors) than he gets right now when the fielders just have to squat under a fly ball and his speed to first is irrelevant.
But is he trying to bunt for a hit very much? I don’t know where to look for attempted bunt stats, but it seems like that should be something he’s doing at least once a game.
This is the closest I could find – Bunts in play. He leads the league in bunts in play at 24, the next closest is Dee Gordon at 15.
http://stats.washingtonpost.com/mlb/getleaders.asp?rank=191
Try telling Billy Burns that most groundballs are outs, Dee Gordon too. When you are that fast you can beat a GB to short.
It’s awful that coaches can’t configure his swing just to hit more grounders than flyers, very few speedsters hit like he does for a reason. I mean is Dee Gordon a good hitter? Hell no, he just knows how to use his skillset.
Reds coaches should be working on an overhaul of his swing in the offseason. Should have happened last offseason…
” Hamilton doesn’t hit the ball hard, and he puts way too many of them in the air. For Hamilton, a fly ball is just about an automatic out.”
To me, this is a pretty fascinating aspect. Ichiro learned how to maximize use of his blazing speed by intentionally putting a lot of balls on the ground and simply outrunning the defense to first.
I was curious if this problem Hamilton has is because that is his true nature as a hitter, or if he is being pitched in such a way to keep the ball off the ground, with teams knowing that anything not hit directly at a defender will end in an infield hit.
Looking at his heatmap:
http://www.fangraphs.com/zonegrid.aspx?playerid=10199&position=OF
Teams are actually pitching him low and away and he is still popping the ball in the air. I wonder if he can learn to make the adjustment to mimic Ichiro’s recipe for success.
Sounds like he needs to have a talk with Votto about not getting under the ball…
We have to keep in mind that Ichiro was one of the best contact hitters ever and you can’t just tell a player to start hitting like that. If Hamilton were to make an adjustment to mimic Ichiro’s style he would have to change his whole hitting approach and it is possible that a long period of slump would be necessary as he adapts to a new approach.
Ichiro also has that insane swing from the left side that gives him almost a running start to first giving him a tenth of a second on anyone else Ive ever seen.
Kinda like the unfairness of Randy Johnson lining up on the left side of the rubber and then throwing side arm 92mph sliders at you.
First let’s take a look at the 2015 spray chart for Dee Gordon, he of the .412 BABIP:
http://www.fangraphs.com/spraycharts.aspx?playerid=8203&position=2B/SS&type=battedball&pid2=8203&ss1=2015&se1=2015&ss2=2015&se2=2015&cht1=battedball&cht2=battedball&vs1=R&vs2=L
I have an estimate of how many runs a hitter would get on groundballs based upon batted ball speed but not direction. Gordon leads the majors through June with 12.5 runs above expected on grounders, which makes sense when you look at his speed and his ability to spray the ball around.
Now let’s look at Hamilton’s spray chart:
http://www.fangraphs.com/spraycharts.aspx?playerid=10199&position=OF&type=battedball&pid2=10199&ss1=2015&se1=2015&ss2=2015&se2=2015&cht1=battedball&cht2=battedball&vs1=R&vs2=L
Despite his speed, Hamilton produced about one run less than expected on grounders. Note all the pulled grounders he has hitting from the left side. Then consider some rough arithmetic on the value of a speedster hitting grounders to the left vs. the right side of the diamond:
– If your SS can throw 90mph, which is 132 feet per second, and his average throw must go 70 feet, his throw will take .53 seconds to travel.
– If your 2B can throw just 75mph, which is 110 feet per second, and his average throw must go 40 feet, his throw will take .36 seconds to travel.
So, all else being equal, you lose about an extra one or two tenths of a second on grounders to 2B vs. those to short. This, in addition to all the weak fly balls, leaves Hamilton with a .258 BABIP.
Just to clarify, I’m not arguing that Hamilton can become Ichiro, or even come close to being the same level of hitter as Ichiro. I’m just saying that if he were to try and emulate that aspect of Ichiro’s game (lots of GB) it would improve him from what he currently is.
But Ichiro was such a freak with the bat in his prime, he could probably hit .300 if he ran like David Ortiz.
He could run like David Ortiz he just chose not to.
He needs to drop and give us 20 next time he hits one in the air.
Sometimes you can teach a guy to hit. You can’t teach him to run.
A major premise in this article is that Hamilton improved his running by applying teachable knowledge.
I think a more accurate statement would be:
you can’t teach speed, but you can teach base running.
If Hamilton learned how to take more walks and hit the ball on the ground more often-he’d be even more devastating than he is now.
He could probably improve his walk rate a bit, but to an extent his walk rate is a function of how many walks pitchers are willing to give him.
I mean it’s not like pitchers were willing to give Rickey a free walk. But that probably has a lot with the fact that Rickey was a great hitter as well and they feared him taking him deep more than they feared him stealing a base.
Rickey was a great hitter, and if he wasn’t swinging, he crouched his strike zone into the smallest rectangle he could. Vince Coleman did the same thing without the hitting. Also, look at Rickey’s full season with the Mets for some of the most berserk numbers you’ll see from a 40 year-old (non-Bonds division).
Better living through chemistry!
(Why isn’t Bagwell in the Hall again?)
Bonds isn’t the best HR hitter (that’s Aaron, Ruth, or Williams). Bonds isn’t he best all-around player ever (that’s Mays).
Of course, he had the chance to be the best all-around player. But being Willie Mays didn’t interest him. (Imagine…)
Instead, he wanted to stand in the box, gigantic and armored like a Transformer– what a sad reference. And the sabermetric community continues to want to lap it up.
Anyway, with Bonds I’m always reminded of paraphrasing Thomas More from Robert Bolt’s “A Man for All Seasons”: It profits a baseball player nothing to lose his soul, even though he becomes Willie Mays. But McGwire and Sosa, Barry? McGwire and Sosa?
Eddie Yost and Eddie Stanky were not feared hitters, yet they managed to get a lot more walks than the pitchers were willing to give them. Being able to do what they did is a real skill, of course, and there is no guarantee that Hamilton could learn to do it, but he certainly should try to emulate that skill.
ALL YOUR BATTING RUNS ARE BELONG TO ME
Dammit Jeff, when will you stop writing about the Red Sox?!?!?!
Is there a stat that measures “effective slugging percentage”? If not, it’s definitely a metric that needs to be created. A walk and a steal is (almost) as good as a double. Add to that the ability to go 12 for 12 on steals of 3rd, and you have a guy who “effectively” hits a lot more triples than his SLG or ISO give him credit for.
That sounds like secondary average
“Secondary average, or SecA, is a baseball statistic that measures the sum of extra bases gained on hits, walks, and stolen bases (less times caught stealing) depicted per at bat.”
http://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/batting/_/position/cf/sort/secondaryAvg/type/sabermetric
That’s a big almost. It’s almost never the same when there’s a man on base, which are when most runs are scored. So, for all situations when a run won’t be scored except through a home run, they are equivalent. In any situation when an XBH could score a run, they are not equivalent. To take this even further, an infield single will hardly ever score a runner from 2B. But lwts counts it the same as an OF single which will often score a runner from 2B.
It makes more sense to simply add his baserunning value to his batting value, which is what is happening here.
If there’s a guy of first, and he hits a bloop single which moves the runner to second, then he’s not going to steal, and his single remains a single. However, that situation is the one where a double or triple is most valuable compared to a single, since they score the runner.
So, such a measurement would severely overrate him, single those exact situations where a double and triple are most valuable are the situations where he can’t hit his effective doubles and triples.
Bill James measured that batting averages are reduced for hitters when base runners are attempting to steal. So a triple would then be better than a double and a SB, since the next batter is not negatively impacted.
I understand this effect is the reason that Trout is not allowed to steal bases before Pujols, as well as that they may just put Pujols on if 1B is open.
We’ve come up with what we’re calling Speed-adjusted Slugging (SaSlg) over at A Very Simple Game (we literally just launched…like, two hours ago).
The stat is calculated with TB + SB – 2*CS – GDP. From the above article (or the example in the post I linked), it’s obviously a stat where the effect of the adjustment is going to be roughly the same for most players – the real value is in the outliers like Hamilton or when comparing Power+Speed guys to Power+ReallySlow guys.
How am I only at .258 for Billy Hamilton?
Fly balls.
and weak contact probably
And some random variation. We’re only halfway through the season. Not everything (especially at this point in the year) has a reason.
If you take this hyperbolic comment literally: “For Hamilton, a fly ball is just about an automatic out.” it makes perfect sense.
IE, Hamilton is 38% FB/40% GB/22% LD. If you weight that to the numbers in the library (http://www.fangraphs.com/library/pitching/batted-ball/) by batted ball type for last year (.207, .239, .685), you get to a .325 xBABIP.
But if he was hitting, say, 0.040 on his flyablls, that drops to .262.
This is obviously oversimplifying, but conceptually it makes some sense: whatever gains vs typical BABIP he might be making from speed on the 40% of his balls in play that are grounders he is more than losing in the 60% of his balls in play that are in the air.
You can’t tell somebody to stop hitting line drives though.
Because who’re a bad hitter who doesn’t hit to your strengths.
Whenever I see scatter plots like this, it’s fun to look at who the other outliers are in the other directions.
On the first chart, the dot way to the right is predictably Bryce Harper. The one all the way at the bottom is Hanley Ramirez. The ones farther left than Hamilton are Alexei Ramirez, Chase Utley, and the American League All Star team’s starting second baseman.
No matter how fast he is, he can’t steal first base.
Billy’s reached first base 65 times this year and stolen second 28 times. He’s stolen second 43% of the time that he’s gotten to first. Billy Hamilton’s OBP is .273, which is bad. But even when Billy Hamilton is bad, he’s still good.
Is there someway to see how many times a player makes it in on base due to an error? I’d be curious to see how often certain players “force” errors than others.
Also I know Runs are crazy contextual, but it would be interesting too to see who often players convert runs from 1st-2nd-3rd base.
I remember reading some research here to that effect…I think before the season started last year? Off to google…
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/footspeed-and-forcing-errors-a-case-study/
Nope, June 2013, by Jeff again, in the early stages of his Red Sox fixation.
I started wondering this too, after watching Rafael Furcal’s rookie season. He created chaos, so many rushed throws that got past the bag, and it resulted in a lot of extra bases that few other players would’ve been given.
Amazing a player with a 54 wRC+ can be worth almost two wins in 68 games.
Given he is still a highly productive player, the Reds should continue to play him in hopes that he can “figure it out” at the plate. I agree that the Reds’ staff should work on his swing plane, but I reckon they know that too and are doing what they can to help him.
A marginal improvement in his hitting ability would be worth significant gains in terms of his overall value.
I hope he can find success at the bat, because he is one of the most unique and exciting players in the league. Thanks for the article Mr Sullivan
The combination of great hitting, lousy defense, lousy base running can net a guy 2 WAR in 77 games. Think of all the bat-first players.
I don’t see why it would be special to have the converse be true.
I hope if he ever does learn to hit grounders that he loses some speed by then. He seems to kill the Bucs. His #’s vs. everyone else must be scary bad. As if a 270ish obp isn’t already.
If you re-do his triple-slash, adding in net steals to his total bases, and removing his CS from his hits and times on base, his “new” line would be .205/.258/.422, compared to his real .224/.275/.291. Ryan Howard’s line is .217/.262/.427, which is good for an 87 wRC+. Not bad for an elite defensive center fielder.