Blake Swihart: The Red Sox’ Mythical Third Prospect

Sometimes we here at FanGraphs like to zig when others zag. Or there are times when others zag and we zag too and then before they can say “Hey you’re zagging!” we switch back to zigging. Lots of virtual ink has been spilled recently on Mookie Betts and Xander Bogaerts and both are well deserving of the attention they’ve received for reasons discussed more on this site and others. But [looks both ways] [leans in] they are not alone. There is a third prospect in Boston with a high ceiling who has been overshadowed by Betts and Bogaerts. His name is Blake Swihart. Three days ago he hit two home runs in Yankee Stadium and when a 23-year-old catcher hits two homers in Yankee Stadium, well, that seems like as good a pretense as any to assess him and his season. So there’s our pretense. Assessment time!

Despite his youth, the switch-hitting catcher spent the majority of the season in Boston. But that wasn’t the original plan. Swihart came into the season slated for duty in Triple-A as he’d spent all of 71 plate appearances over 18 games above Double-A, but all of a sudden catchers started going down. First, starting catcher Christian Vazquez needed Tommy John surgery and the organization promoted backup Ryan Hanigan and picked up Sandy Leon from Washington to back him up. Then two months into the season Hanigan broke his hand and the organization was out of options. Swihart got the call.

Add to that backstory the fact that Swihart, though drafted as a catcher, didn’t play the position exclusively or even regularly until after being selected by the Red Sox of high school in first round out of the 2011 draft. And add this also: Swihart didn’t begin hitting from the left side of the plate until his junior year in high school. That means Swihart has been batting left handed for about five years now, and right handed for, well, much much longer than that. This is all by way of saying Swihart should be raw as hell. And he is raw, and that’s the reason he’s raw, but it doesn’t take a scout to see the potential he’s exhibited this season. To wit: two home runs in Yankee Stadium!

We live in an age that values catcher defense so it seems appropriate to start there and note that Swihart grades out well in both FanGraphs’ and Baseball Prospectus’ defensive metrics. BP also tracks catcher framing and Swihart has been above average, if only slightly, there as well (overall he ranks 30th). That’s not to say he’s a finished product behind the dish. Swihart needs to work on blocking pitches in the dirt and keeping pitches in front of him. He grades out very badly in that regard, but it’s something you can forgive someone with his background and youth. Also he wasn’t bad at it in the minor leagues, so we can assume some of these difficulties are adjustment-related.

Perhaps the most notable aspect of catcher defense — and the one that looks like the most fun to me — is throwing out base runners. The average catcher this season throws out potential base stealers just under 30% of the time (29.8%, precisely). Swihart has thrown out 16 of 56 potential thieves which, you’ll note, comes out to a 28.6% caught-stealing percentage. Pretty much the same thing. Average is a nice place from which to start when you’re 23 and just learning the position. Part of the reason Swihart has achieved averageness in this regard are his pop times — that is, the time it takes for a catcher to receive the pitch, jump up from his crouch, cock his arm back, release the ball, and for the defender at second to catch it. Average catchers take about two seconds to do that. Swihart has typically been clocked in the mid- and high-1.8s. This isn’t quite elite (Vazquez has put up pop times in the 1.6s), but it is above average. You can see the potential in Swihart’s minor league numbers as well, where he threw out 46% of base runners in 2014 while splitting time between Double-A and Triple-A. That percentage was up from his previous season, 2013, where he threw out 42% of would-be base thieves in High-A.

You would expect a step back in the numbers here, as dealing with both major league base sealers and the demands of a major league pitching staff make things more difficult on a rookie. Also, the average catcher isn’t working with the Red Sox pitching staff which… kinda yuck. Still, you can see the potential in the numbers and the highlights, and with Swihart’s age and roundly lauded work ethic, further improvement seems likely.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

But as much as it’s talked about, no catcher can become great if he can only do half the job. And while hitting two homers is great, it’s only one game. Up through Wednesday’s game in New York, Swihart showed what you might call the expected growing pains of a player his age playing his position with his level of experience. The advantage Swihart has here is that the bar for hitting as a catcher has been set quite low. Major league catchers as a group have hit .238/.302/.378 this season. That’s a wRC+ of 85. Swihart has bettered each of those marks by hitting .275/.320/.394 for a wRC+ of 92. He’s just a few years out of high school, still learning the position, and already he’s an average hitter relative to others who play his position. That’s good!

Swihart has had some difficulty barreling the ball up as a right-handed hitter. Four of his five homers have come batting left-handed. It should be noted that one of those is an inside-the-park homer, though it did go off the center field wall, so it’s not like he didn’t hit it well. The lone right-handed homer came off Tommy Milone of the Twins. Overall he’s hitting just .225/.303/.300 from the right side but .294/.327/.431 from the left. Our batted ball strength numbers support this split, mostly because Swihart has hit many more pitches softly from the right than he has from the left.

Of course we’re talking about a small sample of data here, just a hair over 300 plate appearances during the player’s age-23 season. The point isn’t to say Swihart can’t hit right handed so much as he hasn’t done so yet. Further, I hope the above serves to demonstrate overall ability as well as youth, all with the promise of future improvement as well as current averageness. There are no guarantees of course. Plenty of young players have come into the big leagues, looked promising, and flamed out. But you can only play the schedule they put in front of you, and for now Swihart has looked impressive in spite of average numbers.

The Red Sox are facing what looks to be a tumultuous off-season under new team president Dave Dombrowski. The bullpen and starting staff look ripe for reshaping if not outright rebuilding and the trade market looks like the most viable avenue to accomplish this. Moving Betts or Bogaerts seems highly unlikely at this point given their current and future value and place in the organization. Swihart, though, is another matter. He’s highly regarded within the organization as well, but so is Christian Vazquez, whose potentially elite defense allows his offense to be weaker while still achieving a similar overall value. What’s more, the team still has Ryan Hanigan signed through 2017 if it chooses to exercise a team option for $3.8 million. In short, if Dombrowski is looking to make a big trade, moving Swihart might make sense. For now, though, the Red Sox still have three high-ceiling young players, not just two, and as any mathematician can tell you with a minimum of research, three is more.





47 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Tarvis
10 years ago

I just came here for the “too many Red Sox articles” hot takes in the comments.

Wee bay
10 years ago
Reply to  Tarvis

That’s a sizzling comment

Damaso
10 years ago
Reply to  Tarvis

well you have to admit that it’s kinda strange that this bad team this year is getting nothing but positive articles written about it, and lots of them.

and now we get an in depth rosy review of a guy who was ranked the 9th best prospect in baseball on this site and has not looked it this year. And another article on a red sox prospect which chooses to ignore likely unsustainable babip entirely.

But now we’ve had in depth positive reviews 3 red sox kids in the last week or two….a fun exercise might be to make an All Under 25 or 24 year old team, and ask yourself if any of the red sox kids ww have heard so much about this year and as prospects even make the starting lineup.

cornflake5000
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Normally I would say “I bet you’re fun at parties” to comments like this, but everybody that has read your repeatedly joyless comments already knows that there’s no point to joking with you..

Damaso
10 years ago
Reply to  cornflake5000

i am hilarious at parties.

ed
10 years ago
Reply to  cornflake5000

I’m skeptical. Show us what you got.

Miss Cleo
10 years ago
Reply to  cornflake5000

Yes, but not for de reasons dat you tink, mon.

Damaso
10 years ago
Reply to  cornflake5000

hilarious.

ed
10 years ago
Reply to  cornflake5000

Doubtful.

matt
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

.360 BABIP/.336 xBABIP. Whatever.

Hes been worth 1.5 WAR in half a season, and thats after being absolutely brutal for more than a month after being an injury callup. Hes hitting 305/356/457 in the second half. There is no universe where this is a disappointing season.

L. Ron Hoyabembe
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Nope, not strange. Boston is something like 10 games over .500 since the end of July and a large part of that is the strong performances from their very young core. There is reason to be positive about this team.

Damaso
10 years ago

there are some things to be positive about. they aren’t the worst team in baseball. but there’s more to be negative about…..which you wouldn’t know from reading fangraphs.

j-bones
10 years ago

before yesterdays loss, the sox were on a 100 win pace since July 30th

without buchholz, playing mostly all youngin’s and rooks

ed
10 years ago

Amazingly enough, most of fangraphs’ articles are generally positive. That an article about any team would be positive shouldn’t be a surprise.

Taylor
10 years ago

I think they hang on to all 3 of their catchers. Hanigan has been solid, and one of the young guys can be stashed in AAA. With Vazquez they could just say they aren’t rushing him back after a year off, with Swihart they could say he’s working on hitting from the right side.

This way they’re in good shape if one of those guys goes down and we don’t have to watch Sandy Leon get 100 painful ABs next year.

T-Rex Ryan
10 years ago

I think the Red Sox need to maximize the asset value of their players. Swihart is most likely a more valuable player then Vazquez but what use of resources is the most valuable?

Swihart traded in a package for Carrasco with Vazquez starting?
or
Vazques traded in a package for T. Ross with Swihart starting?

I think Swihart should be the piece moved along with Henry Owens for a young proven SP.

fjtorres
10 years ago
Reply to  T-Rex Ryan

Swihart in a package doesn’t get you Carrasco unless the package includes Betts.
The Indians are covered at catcher for the near term and have a couple low-level prospects.
So trading a number one pitcher (on a team-friendly contract) for a 2017 catcher isn’t a priority.
What the Indians need desperately is right-handed power, preferably at 3B or CF. And big MLB power, not 4A power.

ok
10 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

So the Red Sox have to give a player who is better than Carrasco in Betts, and a former top 20 prospect, to get Carrasco?

ed
10 years ago
Reply to  ok

Probably. The Indians don’t really need another catcher at the moment, and have no burning reason to get rid of Carrasco. That’s why there won’t be a trade.

fjtorres
10 years ago
Reply to  ok

If they want him they need to ante up something Cleveland actually needs. Cleveland is set at most positions other than cf and 3b and has no need of catchers or middle infielders.

The sox do have a surplus of outfielders and a shortage of pitchers. So if they want Carrasco (whom everybody seems to want) they can join the bidding, understanding that Cleveland needs match up better with the Cubs and Yankees.

And since Carrasco is a young pitcher with upside on a very nice contract Cleveland needs to be overwelmed to give him up.

Wait until the surplus value articles in the offseason.

Jeff
10 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Lol Betts is not only better than Carrasco, but hes younger, and has a lot more value. Dave Cameron ranked him 11th in trade value in all MLB and his value has only gone up.

The Indians would probably have to part ways with Kluber + Frazier for Betts, and even then, I dont think the RS would make the trade.

Kevin
10 years ago

Coming into the season I was a little skeptical about Swihart, because he was the type of prospect that received a ton of praise from just about every scouting org for his makeup and athleticism, from Kiley to Jason Parks to Keith Law to Jim Callis, but his stats in the minors weren’t really eye-popping the way a lot of top prospects’ are.

Having said that though, I have been really, really impressed. His 92 wRC+ looks pedestrian on the surface, but he’s improved tremendously over the course of the season. His initial call up in May yielded a .241/.279/.326 line over his first 141 PA, good for a 60 wRC+. He then went on the DL on 6/30 and was recalled 7/20. Since then he’s slashed .305/.356/.457 over 164 PA, good for a 120 wRC+.

He also looks like he has the athleticism to swipe 10-15 bags a year, based on how he flies around the bases when he’s on. Combine those with average+ defensive tools and I can see why the Red Sox were reluctant to trade him for a pitcher.

Jason
10 years ago

Wouldn’t they be able to land a good piece with Vazquez and others as well? I mean, other teams are starting to recognize catching defense, so you would think if the Red Sox think highly of him, that others would as well. Seems like they could probably find a way to use both over time. Vazquez catching for 3 games and Swihart for 2, with Swihart finding at-bats via 1B or DH…DO will have to retire eventually. Odds are that one of the two catchers does not pan out, so using them both, and sticking with the one that produces more over time seems like the safer option than trading one.

Dombrowski
10 years ago

Three team trade folks. I am sending Owens, Marrero, and Hanley (taking on a third of Hanley’s contract) to the Angels. They’re sending Skaggs to the Reds. The Reds are also receiving Vazquez and Margot from us. Then the Reds are sealing the pact by sending Joey Votto with his full contract to my team, the Boston Red Sox.

I get rid of Hanley and fill first base with one of the five best offensive players in the game (whose philosophy aligns itself perfectly with our collective team philosophy). We keep Swihart and Rodriguez.

The Angels get a DH, a SS who can potentially replace Aybar after the 2016 season, and a good pitching prospect. They divest themselves of a recent Tommy John surgery recipient.

The Reds free up money for the rebuild, get rid of a guy who isn’t very popular with the fanbase (and frankly isn’t appreciated enough), open up a spot at first base for Mesoraco, fill catcher with Vazquez, and add an intriguing pitching prospect in Skaggs and a very high ceiling outfield prospect in Margot.

We haven’t ironed everything out yet, but I am sure we’ll reach a consensus. We may have to throw in Brian Johnson but we’ll get it done. If the Jays can get Donaldson and Tulo for scraps, I don’t see why we can’t get Votto for legitimate trade pieces.

Jim Lahey
10 years ago
Reply to  Dombrowski

You really think you need to send Owens, Marrero, Hanley and $30mil to get the Angels to trade Tyler Skaggs to the Reds?

Come on now…

Not to mention, they probably don’t want a DH with Pujols around for the next however many more years.

mapsamountainrange
10 years ago
Reply to  Dombrowski

The Reds trade Votto for a recent TJ pitcher? What are you smoking? We already have one of those in Bailey…

Garrett
10 years ago
Reply to  Dombrowski

Hmmm …

The Angels have Pujols and Cron. Both of whom already occupy potential positions for Ramirez. I’d take EITHER bat over Ramirez. The Angels would potentially be on the hook for $58M (after your $30M contribution) over 4 years. That’s still nearly $15M/year and he is nowhere close to that value today.

Marrero doesn’t help. He’ll be 27 by the time he would get a shot at taking over for Aybar. He doesn’t have much prospect value at all. Owens is OK at best. A back of the rotation starter is worth something but not a whole lot.

I’m not sure that I would take Hanley + Owens + Marrero period. Throwing in Skaggs … you have to be kidding me. I love your phrasing – divesting themselves of Skaggs as if he is some worthless player. Guy is a year removed from being a top 10 left pitching prospect in all of baseball.

L. Ron Hoyabembe
10 years ago
Reply to  Dombrowski

So it looks like we have someone from every perspective involved who doesn’t like this deal. Is that good or bad?

dr. mvn
10 years ago

**FenGraphs**

Savin Hillbilly
10 years ago
Reply to  dr. mvn

I’m a Sox fan, and I LOL’d.

Ivan_Grushenko
10 years ago

If Swihart actually exists, what makes him “mythical”?

L. Ron Hoyabembe
10 years ago

That inside the park homerun actually hit over the line on the center field wall and should have been a conventional homerun.

http://m.mlb.com/video/topic/6479266/v422700483/bosnym-swihart-hits-insidethepark-homer-for-lead

Damaso
10 years ago

They shoulda traded him for Hamels.

Jeff
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Swihart: 1.5 WAR in 82 games (3 WAR over a full season) @ the league min
Hamels: 4 WAR in a full season @ 23mil a year

Swihart should only get better, Hamels will be 32 next year.

Not to mention, the Redsox probably would of had to trade additonal prospects on top of Swihart.

I think they made the right call.

Eephus
10 years ago

Blake Swihart doesn’t wear batting gloves. That is all I need to know. He’s a gamer.

MjwW
10 years ago

And people laughed at me when I called this place Fengraphs.

There are 29 other teams, Fangraph writers….give them some love. You will still get page views if you don’t writer about the Red Sox every day.

Joe Kelly
10 years ago
Reply to  MjwW

It’s been a full month since they’ve done an article about me 🙁

Serbian to Vietnamese to French and back
10 years ago
Reply to  MjwW

And everyone laughed at me when I called this place Fengraphs.

There are 29 other teams, writers Fangraph … Give them love. Still attitude, if there was a writer for Red juice every day.

ed
10 years ago
Reply to  MjwW

I don’t know. I imagine they get more views on Red Sox articles, which is why they keep writing them. Fangraphs isn’t a public service or something.

Baron Samedi
10 years ago

I look forward to seeing exactly how the Red Sox will cock this one up.

Jeff Chisholm's boyfriend
10 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

You look forward to seeing Red Sox cock? This isn’t that kind of site…

Cool Lester Smooth
10 years ago

Guess which one’s Swihart and which is John Ryan Murphy!

Player A: 5.9 BB% 24.9 K% .120 ISO .360 BABIP .275/.320/.394 .313 wOBA
Player B: 6.5 BB% 24.4 K% .132 ISO .360 BABIP .283/.329/.414 .322 wOBA

The Pirates are gonna love him in a few years.

L. Ron Hoyabembe
10 years ago

Not saying JR Murphy is bad, but comparing a half-season worth of stats to a quarter season worth of stats is not really that instructive.

NH
10 years ago

If you show me some framing stats, I’ll take a stab at it.

Ron
10 years ago

How are people surprised that there is a lot of content about the young players of a team that is 1st in MLB in WAR from 23-and-under players?

People are interested in predicting and reading about the new “great homegrown teams”, look at how much attention the Cubs and their wave of hitting talent got over the past couple years. Or the Mets and their great rotation of young aces. Look how strong the interest is in Kiley’s and other sites’ prospect coverage. This is pretty straightforward. Young players playing well generates interest.

neil lamont
10 years ago

Why do the Sox even need to make a trade? They sign Price and then have Buck, Rod, Wiley, Porcello,Owens , Wright sign Hill ,Kelly. They can get pitchers 2-5 out of this group.

james wilson
10 years ago

Vazquez is a beast behind the plate. He’s a keeper. Keep and develop Swihart to spell Vasquez forty games–especially next year– and learn 1B and LF. He’s athletic. Castillo may or may not work out, ditto Shaw. Trade him when he’s really worth something. A premium catcher is worth a great deal to a team in need.

Ship Hanley whatever the cost. Send him to where ever Cherington lands.