Toronto and the Postseason Crapshoot
Let’s just be real here and leave the analysis aside for a moment: it’s difficult to picture the Blue Jays losing. They got smoked yesterday, but only after clinching their division, so their lineup was missing its starters. That can be forgiven. Their overall run differential is better than second place by nearly 100. They have baseball’s best record since the All-Star break. Since beginning the little flurry with the Troy Tulowitzki trade, the Jays have won three-quarters of the time, and not even the Cubs have been able to keep up. Aggressiveness at the deadline took care of seemingly all the team’s problems, and now Marcus Stroman is back and starting and looking terrific, and this has been present the whole year:
The Jays are what’s been classically defined as “stupid-good,” one of the few teams in the American League playing like it ought to. It’s no mystery why they’ve succeeded, and now that a berth in the first round has been clinched, it’s at last time to look ahead. The Blue Jays feel like a super team. Especially given how they’ve played the last few months. So, what’s historically happened with teams like this?
Think about all those things people say you need in the playoffs. Never mind whether you actually need them — just think about them. With David Price, the Blue Jays have a proven ace starter. The team has a good overall defense. Excellent veteran catcher. The baserunning is surprisingly good, and the best hitters in the lineup are powerful without being strikeout-prone. The bullpen is much better than it used to look, and so if the team is lacking in anything, maybe it’s playoff experience. Now, it’s never been convincingly demonstrated that playoff experience is critical to winning, but let’s just keep it there. It’s a thing, and maybe the only thing.
It’s not that the Blue Jays are flawless, but that, relatively speaking, they’re probably the least flawed. I examined the 21 seasons going back to 1995, which was the start of the wild-card era. That gives us 624 team-seasons overall. This year’s Jays have an OPS differential of .090, meaning their batting OPS is 90 points higher than their opponents’ OPS. That ranks them 21st in the spreadsheet, which is pretty good. 21st, out of 21 seasons.
But, the Blue Jays don’t quite resemble their early-season selves. They got this good in the middle. They addressed their biggest issues in the middle. So it gets really interesting when you split at the All-Star break (for convenience). What happens when a team looks this good? Since the break, the Jays have posted the highest OPS in baseball. And, since the break, the Jays have allowed the lowest OPS in baseball. It doesn’t get better than ranking first. Since the break, Toronto’s OPS differential is an obviously league-leading .161.
And that, as you could guess, is fantastically good. Again covering the wild-card era, here are the 10 best team OPS differentials in the second half, leading up to the playoffs:

| Team | Season | OPS for | OPS against | Differential |
| A’s | 2001 | 0.838 | 0.652 | 0.186 |
| Rangers | 2011 | 0.830 | 0.664 | 0.166 |
| Mariners | 2001 | 0.798 | 0.635 | 0.163 |
| Blue Jays | 2015 | 0.826 | 0.665 | 0.161 |
| Rays | 2012 | 0.735 | 0.581 | 0.154 |
| Yankees | 2009 | 0.852 | 0.703 | 0.149 |
| Indians | 2005 | 0.824 | 0.679 | 0.145 |
| Braves | 1998 | 0.776 | 0.637 | 0.139 |
| Yankees | 1998 | 0.832 | 0.699 | 0.133 |
| White Sox | 2003 | 0.844 | 0.712 | 0.132 |
I know you’re more used to seeing run differential instead of OPS differential, but I think this one is a little more useful. I mean, runs are the things that actually matter in the moment, but runs can come with noise; OPS differential strips some of that away. This is a good reflection of why the Blue Jays seem so unbeatable. They’ve had one of the most dominant second halves in the last two decades. They rank fourth in that table, and it drops off pretty quick. There are just five teams north of .150.
If you were wondering if the Blue Jays have really been dominant, that answers that. Really, it shouldn’t be a question. The bigger question now is, how relevant is that information with the playoffs in mind? The second half leads into the playoffs. How good have those second-half teams been in the playoffs?
There have been 166 playoff teams since 1995. They’ve played a combined 1,314 games, with an average second-half OPS differential of .059. Six teams have actually reached the playoffs with a second-half differential in the negatives. I had to split these up somehow, so I drew a couple lines. I put one at a differential of +.100, and another at a differential of +.050. I was left with three groups, each having performed differently well down the stretch.
Group 1 includes those teams with the best second-half performances. In the playoffs, they’ve won 55% of their games.
Group 2 includes those teams with more average second-half performances. In the playoffs, they’ve won 47% of their games.
And Group 3 includes those teams with the weakest second-half performances. In the playoffs, they’ve won 51% of their games.
The lines are arbitrary, so the numbers change if you move them around. If you split into even thirds, you get playoff win percentages of 52%, 50%, and 48%, in the same order. Those numbers make more intuitive sense — better teams win more games, in the season and in the postseason. Still, the line is almost flat. If you just look at the top 10 in second-half differential, you get a playoff win percentage of 61%, but if you look at the top five, it’s 57%.
Incidentally, the No. 1 and the No. 3 teams in second-half OPS differential were both eliminated by the 2001 Yankees, who ranked 111th in second-half differential among the playoff teams. The No. 2 team came a hair away from winning the World Series. The No. 4 team — excluding this year’s Blue Jays, who haven’t played in the playoffs yet — won the World Series. The World Series was also won by the 2006 Cardinals, who allowed a higher second-half OPS than they put up themselves.
Depending on how you look at this, this is either encouraging or it’s not. History suggests the Blue Jays are positioned to win more than half of their playoff games. Maybe even 60%. They’re a good team, possibly the best team, and good teams win more in the playoffs than the lesser teams. But — and this probably doesn’t need any explaining — there is no key to running through the playoffs without getting beat up. There is no “solution,” and even good teams lose, because in the playoffs, all the teams are good teams. In the regular season, a .600 team will beat a .500 team 60% of the time. In the playoffs, a .600 team will beat a .550 team 55% of the time. So the .600 team appears weaker, and this is so elementary I shouldn’t spend another word on it.
It is difficult to picture the Blue Jays losing. They’re positioned better than the average playoff team. They have just about everything you could possibly want, and they’re at something approximating full strength. The Blue Jays should be considered the American League favorites. In October 2012, Justin Verlander got beat by Barry Zito. No matter how a team is built, the playoffs will never be comfortable.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

Im just so excited to experience it
Amen to that.
See ya in a few weeks.
As a Mets fan I can only concur. See you soon !
I think they’ll pull a 2014 royals act and win every game going into the WS then lose game 7. Im thinking the pirates if they win the WC game are the best NL team and would be able to beat the Jays. Really I just believe that a NL cntral team deserves the title. That said, last year we had two WC winners in the WS so, talent and win % don’t seem as important in the playoffs.
If there is anything we can virtually guarantee WILL NOT happen, that is it.
The NL central deserves the title. Except for the fact is has 2 god awful teams and gets to play the NL East alot too.
The Jays run differential is on another planet to the NL central teams. If anyone ‘deserves’ a title, its them, but we all know it doesn’t work like that
“Deserve’s got nothin’ to do with it.”
-Clint Eastwood
The ’09 and ’98 Yankees were the only teams from that list that won the world series. That list also makes the ’98 WS that much more impressive.
The Padres actually won the NL in ’98; the Yankees-Braves happened in ’96 and ’99.
Blue Jays could win a majority of their games in the playoffs and still fail to reach the World Series. That’s why it’s a crapshoot.
Last year the Nats outscored the Giants in 4 games and lost the NLDS 3-1.
The 2007 Rockies finished the season on a tear and won their first 7 PS games. Then got swept in the WS.
In the 2001 WS, the D’Backs scored almost three times as many runs as the Yankees in the first 6 games, and were tied 3-3 at that point. And needed a 9th inning miracle against the greatest reliever in PS history to win the WS.
It’s like the PGA Tour. One player or one team can be reliably be said to be more likely to win than any other specific player or team, but less likely than any of the other players or teams together.
The postseason is gonna be awesome thanks to teams like the Blue Jays. Of course, the Twins are gonna win it all,* but it’ll still be a fun ride.
*i have absolutely no evidence to support this claim.
That’s just what happens with the Twins man. They only go all the way when they really don’t deserve it.
Maybe in ’87, but that 1991 team paced the AL in wins.
No, that would be the Giants.
What postseason experience do they have? Their manager has zero postseason experience and has punted two games, all but ceding homefield advantage to the Royals if the Jays make it to the ALCS.
Here is what is going to happen in the AL playoffs (I care not for the inferior National League):
ALDS Jays 3 Rangers 1
ALDS Yankees 3 Royals 2
ALCS Yankees 4 Jays 2
All static, all the time
It’s funny because they’d have homefield advantage over the Yankees in that scenario, wouldn’t they?
No, Yankees earn the Royals homefield advantage if they beat them. It is like eating the heart of a vanquished fore.
That is not accurate. The team with the better record gets home field advantage. Not to mention that if a division winner is playing a wild card team, they automatically get home field advantage regardless of record. So, the Royals are the only team against whom they wouldn’t have the edge IF the Royals were to pass them in the coming days.
Don’t feed the trolls. Especially when they are pretending to be someone else
Fun fact, every team in the AL would be fourth in the NL Central.
We’ve heard enough about second and third place teams in the NL Central, it’s time to talk about winners.
Fun fact: if they were playing in the NL Central, every team in the AL would probably have a better record than they currently do. Maybe even better than the 1st, 2nd, and/or 3rd place teams.
So in your world, facts include the phrase “would probably”.
Interesting….
incorrect
Fact: I’m actually a college English professor!
Fun fact: Fun facts are not actually facts. They’re fun.
…would probably have
-or-
…probably would have
Curios since the Pirates, Cards and Cubs were 34-26 in IL play.
“All but ceding homefield advantage”
That’s interesting. So you see the current runner-up as the favourite?
“Ceding home field advantage to the Royals”? As it stands right now the Jays still possess home field advantage going into their final series with the Rays, who have nothing to play for while the Jays will have their starters back in place. The Royals are going in to a series at Minnesota who will be pulling out all the stops to get into the wildcard game. You’re telling me that it’s inevitable the Royals will pick up a full game on the Jays over the weekend? It’s possible but not the most likely outcome.
To be honest it doesnt appear from the outside that either team (Royals or Jays) really care about home field advantage. The Royals have been sitting their regulars for what seems like a month now (and havent stopped even though the Jays have caught them) and the Jays seem pretty happy to do the same.
Cant really say I blame them either. I’d rather have my guys rested and healthy than HFA.
And, yet, this is exactly what has now happened, with one game left to play.
A Royals win or a Blue Jays loss tomorrow and the Royals have home field advantage as far as they can take it this post season.
I feel compelled to point out that although resting the starters has been part of why the team has lost the last two games, they remain tied with the Royals in the standings and hold the better record against KC this season, which is relevant in case they finish with identical records.
But that aside, the home field advantage is only so in series that go to 7 games. Let’s assume that Toronto plays KC in the ALCS. Toronto gets to host the first two games, but then they play three games in KC. KC then holds the advantage going into game 6. The idea of home field advantage is a pretty marginal one either way, but when you consider that it’s not until a series comes down to a single game that you actually have use of that advantage that you realize how little it matters.
Yep the inferior NL has only won 6 of the last 10 WS and 4 of the last 5.
Although I don’t like either team, I admit that a Royals-Blue Jays ALCS matchup would be pretty interesting baseball.
Their 4 game series just after the trade deadline was darn exciting baseball.
How could you not like Toronto? The Royals I completely understand…
Try being a non-jays fan living in Canada. Its pretty easy to develop a dislike of them without even trying.
I don’t think it’s easy to dislike the Jays. They’re a phenomenal baseball team. They play crazy good defense, have some electric arms, base run well, and obviously obliterate baseballs offensively.
are they really that inexperienced?
Martin (7 previous post-season appearances), Tulo (2), Price (5), Donaldson (3), Buehrle (3), Hawkins (4), Navarro (2), Lowe (2), Estrada (1)
maybe the best thing about this team is that the lineup next season projects to be exactly the same. literally every position is already filled by a quality player with depth behind them to boot. they could literally punt the offseason and still have the best lineup in the MLB. pitching will need some help ’tis true, but there’s money for that, and this run will have gone a long way to making Toronto a more desirable destination.
100% agree on the experience comment + doubt it really matters…
on paper, the lineup looks ferocious in 2016 (again.) do you worry though that so much WAR is going be headed deeper into the dreaded mid-30s? I am not trying to be a naysayer, but take whatever the median of the model looks like for TOR 2016 offense and you have to assume that the skew is much more negative than positive, right?
It is a concern, but as of now everyone is aging gracefully. Tulo is a little worrisome but I don’t think he’s breaking down physically to be honest. His defense in the second half had been superb. Plus the strength of this team is really that there are so many quality players. A couple guys having off years is totally covered.
The Jays run differential is 229. The next three AL teams have a total run differential of 239.
One interesting thing was that over at BR, the Jays had the highest SRS in all of MLB even when they were a 0.500 team. Now their SRS is 1.6 double the 0.8 that NYY and HOU have. The highest SRS in the NL is STL’s 0.6. Who knows if this has any predictive power!
I think there is enough post-season experience to keep everyone grounded. This is a team that keeps coming like a locomotive. 3 run lead? Push harder and make it a 7 run lead. With big leads piled up, the pitching staff can just pound the strike zone – it matters little if you give up a solo home run. I’m optimistic, but the games are not played on paper, and I don’t have the greatest confidence in the skipper.
As a lifelong Bluejays fan who has been watching the team since sometime before George Bell was launching bombs into the seats at Exhibition Stadium, I can say unequivocally that this 2015 squad has been every bit as fun to watch as any of the late 80s and early 90s ballclubs that were my old favorites. 22 years is a long time. It has not gone by quickly. It has gone by slowly, and for the most part, disappointingly for this organization. I am beyond excited about the return to the postseason, and regardless what happens, some great matchups lie ahead that will make for compelling baseball. Whichever team’s pitching gets hot and stays hot in the postseason will win. Hopefully Stroman will enjoy a bigger stage…
It’s been so long, I had to become a Red Sox fan while I waited.
Scum.
ok, I understand adopting a secondary team to keep a rooting interest, but doing it in the same division as your primary team reeks of sports bigamy/ band-wagonning.
unforgivable
It’s going to be really fun to be the 2016 Blue Jays too.
For FanGraphs writers, it’s going to be fun to write about the 2016 Blue Jays, haha.
2016 Red Sox will get considerably more Fangraph articles than the Blue Jays. I’d be surprised it the Blue Jays get one a week, while the Red Sox will get one a day in the offseason.
seriously, man, get your own nickname, don’t steal someone else’s.
Ahem, I’ve been using this last name since 1969.
Man, did you have to bring back more bad Tigers’ memories? Today sucks. Just like the last 5 months.
One thing that gets overlooked due to the predominance of fwar is how good the Jays’ pitching has been this year by other measures.
i.e. amongst active rosters, the jays have the 3rd best team ra9war in base.
Blue Jays suck!
You should take part in a contest for one of the highest
quality sites on the web. I most certainly will highly recommend this website!