Brandon Belt Looks to Break Out Again (Again)

Brandon Belt has shown this before: a 10- or 15-game stretch in which he looks to be the real slugging threat everyone talked about during his prospect days. He did it in August of 2013, and then he did it again to open the season in 2014; the latter seemed like it might be the one that would stick, but Belt broke his thumb on a hit by pitch in early May, suffered a concussion in July, and his season was effectively derailed.

In truth, we haven’t seen this sort of thing too often from San Francisco’s giraffe-like first baseman:

Belt_Coors_Homer

Sometimes a hitter just runs into one, and sometimes balls go very far at Coors Field. Regardless, his homer from last week was quite a punctuation mark — a mic drop, if you will — and it should at the very least force us to ask that familiar question concerning Belt: what can we really expect from him?

Belt has been an above-average offensive player since his debut in 2011, fueling a career 127 wRC+ with a high line-drive rate, an average eye for walks, and enough power to make up for his elevated strikeout rates. While the .396 BABIP he currently sports this season is due for regression, his .338 career mark shows that there is some batted-ball talent there.

An injury-shortened 2014 was a departure from his great 2013, as his line-drive and walk rates fell alongside increased strikeouts. Much of that can probably be chalked up to the various maladies, however, as his rate stats at the beginning and end of the season (when he was healthy) were more in line with expectations. Now that he’s fully healthy and entering his prime at 27, we would hope to start seeing his full potential realized.

The first thing of note so far this season: his line-drive rate. We’re not really close to the stabilization point for line drives — that comes around 600 balls in play — but Belt has been squaring up balls to the tune of a league-leading 35% liner percentage. We can’t say that will certainly continue, but we can say that’s been a very good thing, and it’s one of the drivers of his elevated BABIP.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

What’s also interesting is where those line drives are going. Let’s start with this chart, courtesy of Baseball Heat Maps, that shows the angles of Belt’s line drives, fly balls, and home runs over each individual year of his career:

Belt_Angle_Chart

Negative values mean he’s hitting the ball to left field, while positive ones mean he’s going to right field. It’s not hard to see what’s happened over the past few years: while he spent 2013 and 2014 pulling the ball more, he’s now going to the opposite field at a higher rate than ever before. There’s usually a trade off that happens when players make this change: they might find more hits in the opposite field, but there also tends to be less power. Has that happened to Belt?

To find out, let’s take a look at his ISO to each of the pull, center, and opposite fields since 2012:

Pull Center Oppo
2012 .289 .118 .173
2013 .357 .126 .247
2014 .472 .152 .094
2015 .463 .212 .172

Belt started in the majors with a pretty good opposite-field approach, and 2013 was probably the best culmination of a productive all-fields mindset without sacrificing too much pull power. We can see what happened in 2014: Belt was yanking everything, which boosted his power to the pull side at the expense of the opposite field. So far in 2015, he’s putting all of those together, mashing to the pull side at a 2014 clip while adding extra base power to the opposite field. That’s what we want to see out of him (it’s what we want to see out of most hitters, to be fair), and it should give us confidence when he does things like this:

Belt_Oppo_Homer

Belt had only five career opposite-field home runs before he hit this one on May 17th. If he keeps putting up those type of opposite-field ISO numbers, that count will rise.

What is driving this increased power to all fields? Better plate coverage. Let’s look at a GIF of Belt’s ISO per pitch in each part of the zone between 2013, 2014, and this season:

ISO_Heatmap

In 2013, Belt showed a very good general ability to hit for power throughout the strike zone. In 2014, that power contracted, with focus moving to the inside part of the plate, where Belt was trying to pull pitches for home runs. This season, his plate approach is the best yet: his coverage of the outside part of the plate is back to 2013 levels, but his power has actually extended on the inside part of the plate past where it was in 2014.

He’s now hitting pitches off the plate inside (especially high) for power while not sacrificing his ability to drive the ball to the opposite field. If this approach sticks for Belt, it’s the culmination of a lot of plate approach tinkering, and it should limit his previous vulnerabilities to pitchers adjusting to him by cycling through going inside and outside.

The big question, just like previous years, is whether this will stick. We know the BABIP numbers are going to decrease, and he’s probably not going to hit line drives 35% of the time for the rest of the season. Hot streaks always make players look great, and maybe he’s just been mashing the ball for a few weeks.

He does seem like he’s showing us something new this year, however: a blend of two approaches, each successful in their own way, that together might finally make Belt into the player that everyone has expected for the past few years. Perhaps that player isn’t a 25-30 home run guy; maybe he’s more of a gap to gap hitter with 20-ish home-run power. I think a lot of people would be very happy with that, the Giants included. Who knows — with the prospect of an entire healthy season during his prime, Belt just might surprise us.





Owen Watson writes for FanGraphs and The Hardball Times. Follow him on Twitter @ohwatson.

24 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Ben KaspickMember since 2017
11 years ago

Nice article. A big season wouldn’t be a surprise for Giants fans. This guy is (and always has been) a terrific hitter. Like you said, he has a career 127 wRC+ despite struggles and injuries. The sky’s the limit with Belt.

Joe Kelly
11 years ago
Reply to  Ben Kaspick

Where have I heard that before?

ljc
11 years ago

What does the x-axis represent on the angle heat map?

ljc
11 years ago
Reply to  Owen Watson

Thanks! I thought it was progressing by season, but I couldn’t didn’t get the values.

D4P
11 years ago

Also worth noting that Belt is 2nd in the MLB this year in Hard%, behind only Giancarlo Stanton.

Greg
11 years ago

While his .396 BABIP seems undeniably unsustainable, I think his approach this year looks very tough to defend against (at least when he doesn’t strike out, which is pretty common for him). As D4P said, he’s 2nd in hard hit%, but he’s also 1st line drive%, hits a really even batted balls split of 35% LD, 35% GB, 30% FB (no pop ups so far this year), and even uses the whole field a lot more than the typical hard hitter. He might not be blistering fast, but everything else seems like an approach that naturally would support a really high BABIP.

FeslenR
11 years ago

too bad he’s never healthy

chaz
11 years ago
Reply to  FeslenR

Most of his injuries have been of the freak variety, not your serious recurring issues like Angel Pagan or something.

Rich
11 years ago
Reply to  FeslenR

Chaz is right. Belt’s issues have been of the Jayson Stark weird injury sort, not chronic problems due to poor conditioning, etc.

Last season he was breaking out as well and then gets hit in the face by a ball during BP and broke his thumb on a HBP. Bad luck is what that is.

Belt is basically a taller Anthony Rizzo with a goofy nickname. In fact, if Belt can sustain the production that it appears he’s capable of, he’ll surpass Rizzo in true production (but probably not perception). Hell, he already owns a higher career OPS+ (128/124) than Rizzo.

Jayson Stark
11 years ago
Reply to  Rich

At least I’ve never gotten locked up for driving over 100MPH after wrapping up my latest column.

Rich
11 years ago
Reply to  Jayson Stark

Who is this referencing?

obsessivegiantscompulsive
11 years ago
Reply to  FeslenR

I see the points made here about freakiness of the injuries, but I would note that two of his longest DLs were due to HBP injuries to his hand, in 2011 and 2014. So it is kind of like Sapulo with his foot injuries 3 years in a row, or Curry with his ankle, is this a recurring thing or freakiness? I worry that Belt might be just too close to the plate or just haven’t learned to turn the right way when the pitch is coming at him, either way, is there a mechanic reason his hand has been broken twice by pitches, or were both simply wrong time, wrong place?

david
11 years ago

Belt’s stance/approach makes him more prone to HBP on his hand/wrist. Hell, just the other day he took a Kershaw fastball off the hand.

obsessivegiantscompulsive
11 years ago
Reply to  david

Thanks, forgot about that one already, I was flashing back to both injuries when he got hit by Kershaw, I was so happy he was OK! I found it hard to breathe until he checked out OK. Are there batting gloves that can help with this in any way, give some more protection?

Ron Blair
11 years ago

I think both Brandons are coming of age this year from an offensive perspective. Both were fast-tracked through the minors with insufficient seasoning at AA and AAA levels. Very difficult to mature and adapt with the quality of pitching at MLB level. Belt had nothing to do with both balls that hit him last year. I think we are seeing a maturing ball player entering his prime + a Gld Glove caliber defender.

Splatypus
11 years ago

Aaaand he hits a home run to left center tonight. Good timing.

obsessivegiantscompulsive
11 years ago
Reply to  Splatypus

I was thinking the same thing!

#belted
11 years ago

And a double to LCF. Considering his game last night, this column could not have been more on the mark

efountaine6
11 years ago

This is a really good article. I was a little concerned to see his BABIP so high knowing that he was going to regress however with his Line Drive percentage high as well he wouldn’t regress as much. His line drive rate is higher than his career average but isn’t that more sustainable since he is crushing balls everywhere?

obsessivegiantscompulsive
11 years ago
Reply to  efountaine6

There is an article, I think on SI, about players who are going to regress, and it noted Belt’s BABIP at .396 or so. And it’s true that line drive would keep it high, but I think the article notes a line drive percentage in the 30’s, which is too high to maintain, nobody keeps it that high over a season (but there’s always the first time :^).

However, he was at .351 in 2012 and 2013. And after he made that adjustment in Philly in 2013, he had a .407 BABIP for two months. So he is capable of sustained high BABIP for a long period of time. Even if he regresses to .351 BABIP, he’ll be around his 2013 OPS, but with more power.

obsessivegiantscompulsive
11 years ago

Great analysis of Belt! He hit an oppo HR last night, just to support your article’s conclusions! :^D

This article is a perfect continuation of the article by Eno that you linked to (thanks, missed that one! I was wondering why his hitting was different at the start of 2014). I felt like Belt was just continuing his arc from the end of 2013, with 2014 interrupted, but your article shows that he’s been tinkering and adding, and, yes, to your conclusion, he looks like he’s breaking out again.

And, that, to me, has been the problem of a lot of Giants and Belt fans, this notion of breaking out. As far as I’ve been concerned, he broke out in 2012 and has just been growing and getting better since then. Sometimes people set expectations so high that they can’t enjoy when a player is still doing well, even if he’s not matching people’s expectations. He’s been good or very good for a number of years. Maybe he can break out to greatness this season, but even if he falters, it should be another very good year for him, either way. He’s been invaluable to the team for a long time now, I wish people would appreciate that.

And here’s a idea for a future article or two: similar analysis of Brandon Crawford and Matt Duffy. Crawford has had a similar (though much lower) arc, but he’s as responsible for this great winning streak as Belt, co-leaders, and reading Eno’s article on Belt reminds me of recent quotes from Crawford, about forgetting about everything with each AB and focusing on that. And Duffy has been amazing, yes SSS theater, but he just seems to learn at a hyper pace. Recent examples I have seen noted include his looking silly against the starter in his first AB, but then he is observed watching the pitcher intently following, and later in the game, homer to dead center field (more amazing if you know how skinny looking he is and that he has zero homers in 3 years of college ball), and yesterday, a slider specialist who is death on RHH, throws him a couple for strikes, but then that was enough for him to take all the other sliders (and Giants fans have a lot of frustrating experience with young hitters who just can’t lay off those sliders, Schierholtz, Feliz, Bowker) and draw a walk that starts a 6 run rally last night.

You can also add Panik as well, a well known prospect analyst declared repeatedly and strongly that Panik was nothing more than a utility MI, yet he has been so consistently good once he adjusted to the majors in his first month. How is he doing it?

And it would be interesting to know where this hitting success is coming from. Is it the hitting coach, Sir Meulens (his success with Belt is pretty well documented), or is it the manager (study found that hitters joining Bochy teams add 1 WAR over projections, Jaffe study on managers if I remember right, so maybe Meulens is just teaching what Bochy notices), or is it an organizational thing, there was an article before about their advanced video training system, which Belt used (but did not seem to do anything for Noonan; haven’t heard of system since that article), or is it their new hitting coach, Steve Decker, he’s been teaching prospects in the minors for a while now (I’ve been wondering, too, if they are prepping him to be the next manager; Bochy had that heart thing this spring, if he wins another one or two, could just want to retire and enjoy life with his wife).

glib
11 years ago

It has to be coaching. Duffy was not a prospect, Panik was not a top 100 prospect. Crawford has been average at the plate or below for a long time, Pence has improved, Aoki has improved.

obsessivegiantscompulsive
11 years ago
Reply to  glib

Don’t forget to include Posey and Belt.

Posey was viewed as not having that much power. The analysts said he would reach 15-20 homers once he reaches his peak years. He reached that his first season, and he didn’t even play a full season.

Belt was viewed as a power-lacking 1B when he was drafted, the Giants were questioned for drafting him that early. The Giants tweaks worked almost immediately and he flew up the minors, and suddenly all the analysts love him. That ESPN analyst acted like he discovered Belt first, but I’ve not seen one comment by any analyst at the time Belt was drafted that said that Belt was going to do what he has done.