Reassessing Ryan Howard’s Trade Value

You remember the offseason that was. It was the offseason in which the Phillies said outright they’d be better off without Ryan Howard. And it was the offseason that concluded with Ryan Howard still on the Phillies. Things could’ve been more awkward than they were, and a conversation did take place between the parties that tried to smooth things over. But, not very long ago, the Phillies had mentally moved on. The problem was that Howard hadn’t gone anywhere.

Then the season started, and Howard was bad. Maybe that wasn’t the biggest surprise. But the season continued, and now Howard’s been good. Isolating just the month of May, Howard’s posted a 156 wRC+, with familiar-looking power. Cole Hamels remarked that Howard looks like the old version of Ryan Howard, by which I mean the younger version of Ryan Howard, and Ruben Amaro has said before that the best thing Howard can do is hit. When Howard hits, then in theory, there are more options. So it’s worth wondering now: with Howard actually looking productive, what can we make of his trade value?

Let’s go over some of the important details first. Howard has a $25-million salary this year, and a $25-million salary next year, followed by a $10-million buyout of an option. Since this year’s already well underway, Howard is due roughly $52 million or so through the end of his contract. He just had his 10/5 rights kick in, which means he has a full no-trade clause, though it’s unclear what that might mean in his case. The Phillies have said they’re willing to eat money in trades, which should be obvious. Howard is 35, and more of a DH than a first baseman. This past winter, you guys valued Howard at $4 million over two years. Teams clearly weren’t falling all over themselves to get Howard before anyone else.

So what’s going on with Howard these days? He’s swinging more than ever before, in particular at the first pitch. He had a full offseason of workouts, training how he wanted to for the first time since his Achilles injury. He’s hitting what’s almost a career-low rate of groundballs, which works in his favor, because he’s clearly still strong, and on the ground he’s terribly shiftable. And Howard is targeting the outer half. From Baseball Savant, Howard’s home runs, from 2008 – 2011:

howard-20082011

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Meanwhile, his dingers from 2015:

howard-2015

Howard still pulls his grounders. He still strikes out. He’s walking less than ever. But there’s obvious power, still to all fields. How appealing is this rejuvenated one-time superstar?

Two approaches. The first, a more, shall we say, reactionary approach. Howard, this season, has been worth half a win above replacement. The season is almost a third complete. This shouldn’t be a weird-looking number: Howard isn’t much of a defender or baserunner, and his cold April cancels out some of his hot May. Over a full season, he’d be something like a 1.7-WAR player. He’ll be under contract and older next year, so according to the rule of thumb, you dock about a half-win. Put all the necessary numbers together and you get an actual Ryan Howard value of roughly $20 million, between now and the end of next season.

This obviously relies on a bunch of assumptions, and that invites legitimate questioning. And there’s the argument that assets are more valuable in-season than between seasons, although that doesn’t seem to apply as much in cases like Howard’s. Howard isn’t a piece that would be in great demand, like a shutdown starter or closer. Just ballparking it, you get a difference of $30 – 35 million between Howard’s value and cost. Maybe that’s more like $25 – 30 million, since the season’s underway. So, as the theory goes, if the Phillies offered to cover that $25 – 30 million, everyone could expect to break about even. The Phillies wouldn’t get much of anything back. But if the Phillies paid everything, then they could effectively buy a half-decent prospect. A prospect worth something like $25 million. This got mathematical in a hurry, but a $25-million prospect is a prospect from an organizational top-10 list. Generally not the No. 1 or 2, but, real talent.

That would be an estimate of what the Phillies could do, if they found a team buying into Howard’s 2015. But that’s kind of the problem. Everyone knows about Howard’s 2015. Everyone also knows about Howard’s 2014, and 2013. I can’t speak for every front office, but I assume every front office understands that players are more than just their most recent statistics.

You always have to consider the bigger track record. And while each team differs in its evaluations, we can, again, estimate things. How heavily should Howard’s 2015 be weighted? Usefully, we have pre-season player projections, and updated player projections. In Howard’s case, the projections aren’t thrilled.

Before the year started, according to ZiPS and Steamer, Howard was projected for a .313 wOBA, with a perfect 0.0 WAR. But, Howard’s had a solid month. A lot of his power looks like it’s back. Now, according to ZiPS and Steamer, Howard is projected for a .317 wOBA, and a 0.1 WAR.

Which, clearly, is pretty much the same thing. You see an improvement, but it’s slight, a matter of just a few runs over a long stretch. As a replacement-level player, Howard has no meaningful value, even if he’s free. As a just-better-than-replacement-level player, the idea’s the same, and there’s still the matter of Howard presumably declining next summer. Based on the currently-projected version of Ryan Howard, he’s still practically a giveaway, with the Phillies eating everything. The month doesn’t in any real way change the picture.

That approach is a little cold, and pessimistic. The first is a little optimistic. It’s worth noting that Howard could and probably should be platooned. It’s also perhaps worth noting that, while he can be shifted with the bases empty, it’s tougher to shift him with runners on, meaning he hits better with runners on, meaning he’s a little more productive than he seems overall. I don’t think Howard, at this point, is completely valueless. But it is close. So close that the Phillies can’t realistically expect anything if they don’t offer to pay everything. And if they do pay everything, then they could return a projectable player in the lower levels, or maybe an intriguing pitcher with injury questions. Maybe even a guy on the level of Ian Thomas, who the Dodgers picked up Wednesday. Not that the Dodgers would want Howard, but Thomas is fresh in my mind.

Given the slight return, you wonder if it’s even worth it. Maybe the Phillies should just keep Howard and ride him out. He’s not exactly blocking the next big thing, not at the moment, and he’s decently productive and a link to a more successful past. The Phillies don’t need to give Howard away to hit for someone else. That’s on them to evaluate. And in the meanwhile, it would be swell if Howard kept on slugging, because more teams are looking to trade in June than in May, and the more of this that happens, the less the recent past is remembered. At this point, it’s just a mediocre player on a hot streak. Streaks that last two months carry more weight than streaks that last one.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

30 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
durn
11 years ago

Heard Mark Teixeira on SVP & Rusillo talking about moving A-Rod to DH really helped him out. I think the same would apply to Ryan Howard. I think his legs would feel better and you’d see less of that ugly, loopy swinging strike.

And I know he’s the least Cardinals-like player that exists but he hits very well at Busch Stadium and decently at Great American Ballpark, so a platoon role with Mark Reynolds could pan out pretty well offensively.

arc
11 years ago
Reply to  durn

he hits very well at Busch Stadium

Come on.

Low-hanging fruit
11 years ago
Reply to  arc

You’ve crushed me!

durn
11 years ago
Reply to  arc

Where are we going?

Doubt This Very Much
11 years ago

I don’t think anyone is gonna buy into Ryan Howard being valuable enough to trade for unless he continues this all the way through July. Might be worth a few lottery tickets and 5-8MM for a team over two years.

Joe Joe
11 years ago

“The Phillies have said they’re willing to eat money in trades, which should be obvious. ”

I’ve heard the opposite regarding Hamels. If the Phillies were willing to eat salary (which is very logical), they should do it for Hamels instead of Howard.

TKDC
11 years ago
Reply to  Joe Joe

They think Hamels has a lot of surplus value. I’m sure they’d eat salary on Hamels if (to be ridiculous) the Angels offered Mike Trout. Teams very rarely trade the farm for a player. If they think Hamels is worth a couple top prospects with no salary included, they’d think he was worth more if they threw in money. They may be misguided about their premise, but it makes sense if they believe Hamels has so much surplus value that they would not be inclined to throw in any money.

LOLGraphs
11 years ago
Reply to  Joe Joe

They’ve said many times they would include money in a Hamels deal if necessary.

Jamie
11 years ago

Angels or Mariners is really the only question remaining, right?

durn
11 years ago
Reply to  Jamie

I wish the Angels would take him but do you think the Angels would want another overpaid, disappointing left handed hitter when they just cut ties with one?

Garrett
11 years ago
Reply to  durn

… but he wouldn’t be overpaid (presumably). If he’s coming over at $2-4M/year that’s a negligible price. And with no solid prospects going back there isn’t anything to lose.

I’m not a believer at all in Ryan Howard but I also know the Angels can’t hit a lick right now. If they get lucky and Howard has returned to something slightly better than awful I don’t see the downside.

Ebenezer
11 years ago
Reply to  Jamie

If the Mariners are dissatisfied with their production at 1B or DH (since they’re playing Cruz in RF quite a bit), I’d guess they call up Jesus Montero from AAA Tacoma. Montero has slimmed down and is in much better shape than a year ago, although his wRC+ in Tacoma is 113, same as 2014.

Slugerr
11 years ago

Please do another article about how much of a bargain Rick Porcello is again!

arc
11 years ago
Reply to  Slugerr

Where’s the first one?

Kevin Goldstein's dumb fedora
11 years ago

So if Hamels is worth roughly Matt Barnes, Ryan Howard is obviously worth the little leaguer who wears jeans.

Phillies113
11 years ago

The question, ultimately, is “Can the Phillies improve by trading Ryan Howard before his contract is up?”. Considering his overall value over the past few years (his recent improvement notwithstanding), it’s unlikely the Phillies would get a quality prospect in return for Ryan Howard, wherever they ship him. So do you just stick with what you know and ride with Howard for the next year and a half? That’s probably the best course of action at this point, especially knowing Ruben Amaro Jr’s track record of trading for prospects.*

*It’s poor.

durn
11 years ago
Reply to  Phillies113

I completely see what you mean, but I feel like there is this mental block within the organization that they will never be able to truly re-build until Howard is gone. I know there are no hot 1B prospects coming up but I just feel like getting him off the team is some weird, invisible hurdle that everyone needs to jump over before they actually fully rebuild and start focusing on getting better.

Tim
11 years ago
Reply to  durn

That’s exactly what it felt like when the Cubs paid Soriano to play for the Yankees. He wasn’t Howard-bad at the time of the deal, but it just felt like they had to turn the page. Their return in the deal was Corey Black, who was and is unlikely to become a major league ballplayer…

busy scouting t-ball
11 years ago
Reply to  Tim

Corey black is going to be a major leauger. Just not a starter. But very projectable as a 6th or 7th inning guy. But soriano hit every year and not just a month.

tz
11 years ago
Reply to  Phillies113

I think a lot of this may also do with Utley insisting that he won’t allow a trade from Philly. If you can’t get anything for Howard even after eating his remaining contract, and you want to give Franco a fair chance to stick at 3B, you may as well keep your other “face of the Phillies” until his contract is finished.

Tesseract
11 years ago

I can see a team buying high (and possibly regretting it later) based on Howard’s recent performance and making a trade if the phillies eat a big chunk of his cost. The statement that the Phillies could eat all of the cost and “buy” a top prospect is ridiculous. A team would be foolish to trade for Howard AND give a prospect, even if they get him for free.I can see a team buying high on Howard’s

Anon
11 years ago

Another problem with Howard is that there are other trade options out there. As a Dbacks fan, I have to believe Mark Trumbo is available since he is clearly mis-cast as an OF in the NL and the DBacks have too many OF. Trumbo is younger and a much better baserunner and fielder (at least as a 1B, he’s a trainwreck as an OF). He might cost more but he is a markedly better player.

Brian
11 years ago

“And in the meanwhile, it would be swell if Howard kept on slugging”

I have never heard anyone use that phrase, “in the meanwhile,” other than Ozzie Guillen, who uses it every other sentence. I’m wondering if its usage in this post is the author’s way of paying homage to good old Crazy Bones, or if I just found a second person who uses it.

tz
11 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

Irregardless, another fine article. I couldn’t care less about the ocassional mistake.

Jason B
11 years ago
Reply to  tz

I don’t see the problem, that’s perfectly cromulent phrasing.

Stan Gable
11 years ago
Reply to  tz

‘Irregardless’?

JS
11 years ago

I keep hearing the Phillies are willing to eat salary, but so far that has been all talk and no action. I agree they should, but it seems every rumored deal to date has fallen apart based on the Phillies not being willing to take on enough salary.

Ghost
11 years ago

Great post. You make the point that holding onto Howard doesn’t necessarily hurt the Phillies. I agree for the most part, but I would add that every at bat he takes is an at bat that Cody Asche, Domonic Brown, or Darin Ruff could have had. (Asche and Brown are currently in the minors). I’m not super high on any of those players at this point, but they at least have a chance to develop and contribute to the Phillies’s future. Howard does not.

Paul G.
11 years ago

Sheesh. Where have the Ken Phelps for Jay Buhner suckers gone?

What the Phillies should have done is trade Amaro to the Angels for Josh Hamilton. Knowing Amaro, he’d trade for Howard in a second. Addition by subtraction, baby. Then again he’d probably also trade to get Josh Hamilton back.

But, yeah, if I was a GM my best case would be Howard as a platoon first baseman/designated hitter with the latter preferred. There’s simply not a lot of teams that need such a thing and even less that would pay much of anything for it. The Phillies stink and if Ryan Howard can hit some dingers then at least that is some reason to see them.

Honestly, I’m not sure why we are even discussing trading Howard. It’s like trading an aging backup first baseman having a hot May except with a better backstory and a ridiculous contract. More of a freak show than anything.