Brandon McCarthy as a Value
In some ways, this feels like a blog post from ten years ago. The idea template, at least, is the same, but then, we weren’t complete idiots ten years ago. We knew less, but we didn’t know nothing. Brandon McCarthy is a free agent. He looks like a potentially valuable free agent, at least as far as free-agent values go. I’ll explain, starting here: James Shields is also a free agent. He’s one of the high-profile ones, considered just a little below Jon Lester and Max Scherzer. According to our contract crowdsourcing, the audience projects Shields for a five-year contract worth about $90 million, and McCarthy is projected for a three-year contract worth about $36 million. Shields is nearly 33. McCarthy is more newly 31. Shields was extended a qualifying offer.
Here’s what Steamer sees from Shields in the year ahead:
- 19% strikeouts
- 6% walks
- 3.70 FIP
Here’s what Steamer sees from McCarthy in the year ahead:
- 19% strikeouts
- 5% walks
- 3.75 FIP
Let’s continue.
Much of what there is to say, has been said. You know a lot about how McCarthy’s 2014 went. Even if you don’t know all the details, you recall enough of the basic ideas. Struggled in Arizona, with runs that didn’t match the peripherals. Got picked up by New York and succeeded, with the runs falling more in line with the peripherals. Looking at starting pitchers, McCarthy finished even in ERA- with J.A. Happ. He finished even in FIP- with Lance Lynn. He finished about even in xFIP- with Yu Darvish. That one’s the kicker.
Out of 140 starters with at least 100 innings, McCarthy was 11th in adjusted xFIP, between Darvish and Hisashi Iwakuma. Prior to last year’s 77, McCarthy came in at 100 and 102. What that looks like is a weird, random bump. A positive performance fluctuation, if you want to be all dorky about it. When a hitter does something like that, and he’s no longer in his 20s, we’re generally pretty skeptical. We’re a skeptical bunch. But we can treat pitchers differently, because we record pitchers differently. We don’t have a hitter equivalent of measuring a pitcher’s velocity. How hard a pitcher throws is a quickly stabilizing reflection of his ability. Changes are meaningful. According to McCarthy’s player page, between 2013 and 2014, his average fastball got faster by more than two ticks.
Up 2.1 miles per hour, to be precise. There are 152 pitchers who threw at least 25 innings as starters in each of the last two years. McCarthy’s velocity bump was bested only by Tyler Skaggs, who was re-discovering something he used to do. And before Skaggs went down, he was pitching well enough in the American League. Armed with greater strength, McCarthy saw his strikeout rate skyrocket. And while he switched leagues midseason, his strikeouts actually got better. His walks got better. With the Yankees, McCarthy was able to pitch to his numbers, acting as one of baseball’s better pitchers down the stretch.
So there’s a lot in the profile to like, and the improvement is backed up by a change in physical ability. Eno asked McCarthy about this way back in April, and McCarthy talked about a different weight program, with heavier lifting. The idea was to hold up against the grind of the long season, without wearing down, and it’s fair to say McCarthy accomplished his goal:
| Split | Fastball (mph) |
|---|---|
| 2011, 1st half | 91.1 |
| 2011, 2nd half | 90.6 |
| 2012, 1st half | 90.6 |
| 2012, 2nd half | 90.9 |
| 2013, 1st half | 91.5 |
| 2013, 2nd half | 90.3 |
| 2014, 1st half | 92.9 |
| 2014, 2nd half | 92.8 |
In 2013, McCarthy wasn’t able to lift like he wanted to, which cost him in the later months. This year, not only did he maintain his strength — incredibly, he also maintained his health. We’ve all known McCarthy to have a chronic shoulder problem, a particularly unusual chronic shoulder problem, but, let’s put it this way. In talking about Nelson Cruz the other day, Sam Miller pointed to his entirely clean bill of health in 2014. Here’s a screenshot similar to Miller’s, of McCarthy’s injury log:
Absolutely nothing for 2014. He made it to 200 innings for the first time in his life, and while that doesn’t mean McCarthy is a safe bet to get to 200 innings again, this is at least proof of the possibility. Before this year, you could count on McCarthy eventually requiring a DL stint. It was an annual event, and people would just take it in stride. Now, McCarthy’s made all of his starts, while increasing his arm strength. You wonder if he’s finally found the right training program. A relatively durable Brandon McCarthy would be something totally new, something of considerable value.
McCarthy addressed the injury questions. He addressed velocity questions that no one was asking. And what do we make of his ERA with Arizona? From Brooks Baseball, you can see how McCarthy changed his pitch patterns in New York:
| Team | Four-Seam | Sinker | Curve | Cutter | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | 7% | 55% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| New York | 24% | 36% | 21% | 19% | 0% |
Much was said about his cutter, but a bigger change was throwing more fastballs, and in particular more elevated fastballs. McCarthy was quickly approached by catcher Brian McCann, who had ideas of how they could keep hitters off of McCarthy’s sinker, and he said he used his four-seamer up in the zone to generate a bunch of easy outs. Being able to use the cutter more, as well, made McCarthy all the more unpredictable, and with help from Baseball Savant, you can see changes in location tendencies. Facing righties:
Facing lefties:
McCarthy moved more inside on righties, and more away against lefties, and while his strikeouts and walks were already good, he dramatically reduced the quality of contact that he allowed. Maybe that was inevitable, given the nature of fielding-independent statistics. Maybe change was necessary. Whatever the case, McCarthy’s xFIP didn’t move more in line with his ERA; his ERA moved more in line with his xFIP. McCarthy the Yankee threw 70% strikes, getting 50% grounders, and with better velocity and a less-predictable mix, there was nothing to critique. He even reached as high as 116 pitches.
To go back to James Shields real quick: there’s no question that Shields has been incredibly durable. A lot of his value is tied up in his being a work horse, and whoever signs him will expect him to throw upwards of 200 innings a season. A year ago, you’d never expect Brandon McCarthy to reach 200 innings in one season. But now here we are in a new reality, a reality in which McCarthy throws harder and throws more often. He just had a year in which he didn’t get hurt, and it makes you wonder how many more of those he can have, because on a per-inning basis, he doesn’t seem much worse than Shields, if he’s even worse at all. The most positive evaluation possible would say that McCarthy’s one of the best starting pitchers in the league, and while, again, that’s too positive, it also has some basis in fact. There’s an argument, and 2014 dramatically lifted McCarthy’s future projection.
It sounds like the Yankees want to re-sign him. Maybe that’ll happen. Maybe you’re worried that he wouldn’t take what he learned in New York with him elsewhere, but by now that’s all internalized. He knows what he was doing with his pitches, and he knows where he was putting them, so that’s just a part of his identity now, no matter the catcher. So it comes down to this: to what extent do you believe in Brandon McCarthy’s 2014? His history and his ERA will cost him some millions of dollars, but at the same time, that’s precisely how you can go about finding a good free-agent deal.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.



What percentage of this article is you just trying to get more money for your boy? 10%? More?
what?
In fairness to Steve, Jeff’s article is probably the most effective argument you could make for getting into the bidding on McCarthy. If I were McCarthy’s agent, I’d use this article as part of my discussion with teams this offseason. I mean, it’s not like you can put together a 700-page glossy media guide on him like Boras does with his A-list guys. But, to give teams some comfort on his upside over the next few years, the arguments here are pretty compelling.
Not that there’s anything wrong with Jeff making a case about something. I like the fact that he does articles where he goes in depth and doesn’t reach a conclusion, because it shows that sometimes there is no easy answer. But, that doesn’t mean that he can’t also do analysis that DOES lead to a point.
Boras does that for all of his free agents.
You give us true red-blooded, flag-flying, gun-toting Americans a bad name.
Way to call him out. It’s a well known fact that all GMs refer to sportswriters’ talent valuations and, clearly, Jeff stands to profit from this as he is secretly Brandon McCarthy’s agent.
Which reminds me – Jeff, where were you when J.R. was shot? And what about when Mr. Burns was shot?
Great Mr Burns reference! I remember eagerly awaiting the episode to find out who, in fact, shot Mr Burns. I think they even had a contest about it, before the internet exploded. What was that, 20 years ago?
1995. I was in 5th grade.
This must be an ex-agent feeling slighted.
As a Yankee Fan I am so happy that we are pursuing two most undervalued players(in my opinion)with Bmack and Headley.
To be fair, the Yankees generally pursue EVERYBODY…
Bmack? Can we quit with the fucking First-Initial-First-Syllable nicknames already? They’re repetitive and boring. They say “Look at me, I’m tedious and lack imagination.” (And, frequently though not here, “I have trouble spelling Spanish names!”). If you don’t stop, ARod will come to your house and pee on your floor.
Aaron Rodgers?
No you missed the joke……Andy RODdick.
I think it is entirely possible McCarthy isn’t actually a value and gets paid what he is worth and that Shields is just a bad deal.
here’s your classic Sullivan response: probably somewhere between the two
I’ll go on the record saying that, if Brandon McCarthy were a value, he’d be Integrity.
If I were a value, I’d be Debauchery.
If I were a value, I’d be Seven.
I am equal in value to a 1988 Gregg Jeffries Donruss Rated Rookie.
If I were a value, I’d be four rolls of toilet paper for a dollar.
@Joser: That’s a value that’s good up front, but stinks on the back end.
James Shields is consistent and good, but not great. Over 200 IP past 8 seasons.
Mccarthy won’t get paid much because frankly the market knows Mccarthy stinks. In 2013 coming off two seasons where he posted ERAs of 3.24 and 3.32, he was only paid 15 million for 2 years by the Diamondbacks. Now after posting 2 more bad ERA seasons, and 2 years older, how much more can you reasonably expect the market to give him?
Peripherals like him, but he surely seems like the type of guy who underperform the FIPs.
He has only exceeded 200 IP once in his career. Mccarthy is basically an inconsistent version of Tim Hudson. 3 Year 30 million sounds about the max for him.
DEAL
Got to be careful with Steamer and WARs around here. Problem is it bases WAR off xFIP, even for guys who significantly over/underperform them.
Just an example — steamer600 has Brett anderson with the same WAR as Zack Greinke.
Mccarthy projects a 4.00 ERA by Steamer, but gets a WAR of 2.9, because of a xFIP of 3.61. If we base WAR off actual ERA, Mccarthy is more around a WAR of 1.5, minus all the injury risk and you can say he is a 1 WAR pitcher.
Mr Cashman, you have some guys like Nova, Pineda, Sabathia.. do you think they will be significantly worse than a 4.00 ERA to waste money on mccarthy?
It’s ironic you mention Nova, Pineda, and Sabathia in a discussion about a pitcher whose value has been discounted because of health.
Who around here bases WAR off of xFIP? I mean, you could do it that way, and I wouldn’t necessarily see a problem with it, but I’ve not actually seen anybody using xFIP to construct their WAR for pitchers.
That depressed contract couldn’t possibly be because he took a liner off the head in September of 2012 and teams were wary of how he’d come back from it, could it?
And he was given away for free AGAIN at the trade deadline this year. Basically dbacks was trying to give him for free and the Yankees were the only takers.
1) His ERA was legitimately horrible, even if his underlying peripherals suggested he wasn’t that bad.
2) The Diamondbacks deliberately hamstrung him by not allowing him to throw his best pitch for some bizarre reason.
3) The Diamondbacks have a recent history of giving away good players for much less than they’re worth.
YOu bad grammar have.
If we assume a 2 month performance of a pitcher cannot change projections too much, then Mccarthy is not much different from the pitcher he was around the trade deadline. 2 month of good pitching does not override who he was the last 6 years. Anyone who has a basic understanding of statistics knows this is true.
At the trade deadline, he was signed to a 7.5 million per year contract for the rest of the season. He was traded to NYY basically for basically nothing.
Logic says on July 31st, the highest offer for Mccarthy signed to a 1Y-7.5 MIL contract is … nothing (ok a minor leaguer).
Now, even with that good run in NY, we may see his value bumped up to 1Y-10 MIL. So 3Y-30 million is probably the MAX the market is willing to offer him.
You make several faulty assumptions about statistics and the nature of the trade market. Baseball production is not merely the product of a random number generator. In McCarthy’s case, there were significant yet temporary factors inhibiting his value at both the time he signed his contract and the time he was traded to the Yankees. Further, there were actual changes made to his repertoire and approach suggesting that we shouldn’t treat his surge in New York as pure noise (nor should we assume that to be his true talent level, obviously). McCarthy’s durability is a legitimate concern still, and is the reason he’ll only get a 2-3 year deal this winter, but he’ll be looking at a significantly higher dollar amount, and justifiably so. The fact that he didn’t see a strong market for his services at two specific points in his career does not mean that the market has decided that he sucks, always and forever.
Seems curious that you are hinging your argument on the outlier season where he stayed healthy when he has averaged 18 starts a year for the previous 6 years. A 3 year contract for 8 figures a year seems like a bad idea for most of the league, excluding those teams that can afford to risk payroll.
I think almost every single MLB team can afford to risk payroll, because even if an owner *only* breaks even, their franchise valuations continue to increase significantly.
Owners don’t care about annual earnings?
The only issue with McCarthy is injuries. If healthy he’s the same pitcher as Shields.
The increased velocity all but guarantees a significant injury to his shoulder or elbow joint. He’ll be on the DL on or before June 15.
You could probably make an argument that decreased velocity guarantees a significant injury also.
Almost everything one does guarantees a significant injury, if one is a Major League Baseball pitcher.
Were the Padres savvy to get that 2nd year option on Josh Johnson last year? “If healthy” is a ginormous qualifier.