Brandon Nimmo Is Nimmoing So Hard Right Now

Brandon Nimmo
Gary A. Vasquez-USA TODAY Sports

A few years ago, no one would have believed you if you told them that Brandon Nimmo would get $162 million in free agency. That hustling guy on the Mets? How many millions? I don’t know whether it’s the try-hard-ness or the walk-heavy shape of his production, but his rise to prominence and subsequent nine-figure payday elicited more “wow he got what?” responses and raised eyebrows than any marquee free agent in recent history, save possibly Xander Bogaerts’ deal with the Padres. Well, the joke’s on those eyebrow raisers, because Nimmo is one of the best players in baseball this year, and he’s doing it by being as Nimmo as he’s ever been.

What does that mean? I’m glad you asked. For me, the core Nimmo skillset is getting on base without putting the ball in play. He might do it by walking. He might do it by wearing one on the elbow (or, let’s be realistic, elbow pad). However he handles it, though, his most consistent and bankable skill is juicing up the bases for the Mets’ bashers and boppers to drive him home.

In that sense, this season is just business as usual:

Brandon Nimmo, Free Bases by Year
Year BB% HBP% Total
2017 15.3% 0.9% 16.2%
2018 15.0% 4.1% 19.1%
2019 18.1% 2.0% 20.1%
2020 14.7% 2.7% 17.4%
2021 14.0% 1.3% 15.3%
2022 10.5% 2.4% 12.9%
2023 14.7% 1.7% 16.4%

All those free bases add up. Nimmo got a cup of coffee in the majors in 2016, but his first real playing time was in 2017. Since then, he’s seventh in baseball in on-base percentage, just behind plate discipline legend Joey Votto.

While Nimmo gets more than his fair share of HBPs, the vast majority of his non-contact prowess comes down to a superlative batting eye. Put simply, he doesn’t chase; over that same 2017-to-now window, he has the 13th-lowest chase rate in the game, in a dead heat with Mike Trout.

This year, Nimmo has taken his excellent batting eye into overdrive. As a big fan of hitters realizing they don’t need to swing so often, I’m going to enjoy walking through each of these statistics one at a time. It’s worth savoring such a delightful approach. First, Nimmo has never swung at many first pitches, even in the strike zone, and that has only accelerated this year:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
First Pitch Swing Rates by Year
Year Swing% Zone Swing%
2017 22.5% 34.8%
2018 29.2% 43.4%
2019 28.0% 44.7%
2020 31.4% 50.4%
2021 29.5% 45.5%
2022 30.9% 43.4%
2023 23.3% 37.7%

When he gets ahead in the count, he never chases, though he’s willing to swing at pitches in his wheelhouse:

Ahead-in-Count Swing Rates by Year
Year Zone Swing% Chase%
2017 65.7% 12.4%
2018 60.1% 13.6%
2019 68.2% 17.0%
2020 63.8% 18.7%
2021 62.2% 9.7%
2022 59.9% 16.3%
2023 59.2% 10.5%

Even when he gets to a two-strike count, he’s been very good at laying off the bad pitches. This year, he’s become even more adept at offering at the good ones:

Two-Strike Swing Rates by Year
Year Zone Swing% Chase%
2017 81.7% 15.8%
2018 85.4% 22.4%
2019 77.8% 26.3%
2020 90.6% 19.4%
2021 89.4% 21.0%
2022 91.3% 28.9%
2023 98.1% 25.4%

Hey, why not, let’s keep going. Nimmo has seen 24 changeups outside the strike zone this year. He’s swung at exactly three. Changeups used to be an equalizer for righties facing Nimmo, but that hasn’t been the case for a few years now. He just spits on them — or, if they’re in the strike zone, punishes them. He’s running a 75% swing rate on in-zone changeups, and he’s heating up: on each of his last swings, he’s hit the ball 100 mph or more.

Oh yeah: Nimmo has a little pop, too. I know I’ve been waxing poetic about his ability to not swing, but he’s not one of those patience-and-nothing-else types. He averages 16 homers per 600 plate appearances, and his raw power is even a bit better than that, though he puts the ball on the ground too frequently to have sterling expected numbers on contact:

Contact Quality by Year
Year Maximum EV Percentile xwOBACON Percentile
2017 109.9 75 .434 86
2018 110.9 79 .405 76
2019 109.9 70 .380 54
2020 106.9 39 .381 51
2021 111.5 80 .380 57
2022 111.9 80 .361 54
2023 111.9 86 .404 69

This is just who Nimmo is. He waits you out. He’ll swing if you force him to, and he’ll even swing if you just pound the strike zone to avoid his walks. Throw him four balls, and he’ll sprint to first base like he’s being chased. That’s what he’s always done, and what he’s continuing to do right now.

I wish I had something more interesting to say than “this is just who Brandon Nimmo is.” I wish that he had made some sweeping change that turned him from good to great overnight. Heck, I wish he’d made some sweeping change that had little net effect but was interesting. That’s not the story here, though. The story is that waiting for your pitch and trying to clobber it is a pretty good plan.

If you’re a skeptic, you might rightly point out that Nimmo is running a surely unsustainable .372 BABIP so far this year. You’d be right. I might point out in turn, however, that given how hard he’s hitting the ball — his 51.9% hard-hit rate is the best of his career and in the 92nd percentile across baseball — Statcast thinks he should be slugging .466 so far this season based on the quality of his contact. That extra-base pop more than compensates for the lost singles you can expect to see as the year rolls on; as such, his wOBA and xwOBA are almost exactly identical, just with lucky singles swapping for unlucky hard-hit outs.

You might think that Nimmo is doing one spectacularly important thing better this year: striking out less frequently. That’s true, undoubtedly; his 13.8% strikeout rate is a career low. But I don’t expect that to last; he’s actually making less contact this year than last and has a higher swinging-strike rate despite swinging less frequently. It’s too early in the year to believe small changes in someone’s strikeout rate. Let’s put it this way: over the past three years, he’s struck out 18.5% of the time. Every projection system we host thinks he’ll strike out between 17% and 17.7% of the time the rest of the year. In other words, the strikeout rate improvement is probably real but quite small in magnitude.

In the past, the main thing holding Nimmo back from star-level value was availability. I know I spent a while talking about how his contract surprised people, but the fact of the matter is that he’s been excellent when healthy throughout his career. In 2,368 plate appearances before this year, he’s compiled 17.9 WAR, a 4.5 WAR/600 PA pace. In other words, he’s played like a perennial All Star when he’s on the field. The problem is that he’s eclipsed 600 PAs only once, thanks to early-career platooning and then injury issues.

I won’t pretend to be a health expert, but I’m willing to bet on Nimmo being mostly healthy this year. Why? Because that one full season of his career was 2022, and because he’s been healthy to start 2023. That’s a good trend, to say the least, and the further the Mets get away from the old regime, the more their snakebitten history with injuries normalizes. I’m not saying Nimmo is a lock to stay healthy all year, but he doesn’t seem more injury prone than any random 30-year-old-hitter to me.

To reiterate a theme one more time: nothing Nimmo is doing this year is particularly revolutionary. He gets on base. He hits for enough power to keep people honest. He plays good defense; since the start of 2021, he’s tied for 10th among centerfielders in OAA, Statcast’s defensive metric. This is who Nimmo has been for years at this point, as surprising as that might sound.

When you put it that way, maybe what he’s doing right now is less shocking than it first seems. He’s near the top of the leaderboards because that’s the kind of hitter he is: one of the best 25 or so in baseball. He’s not burning unsustainably bright. He didn’t need to make a wholesale change to his game to go from exploitable to unstoppable. He’s just being himself, the same Nimmo he’s always been. Not everyone at the top of a leaderboard on May 2 is there because of some new hot thing; sometimes, the players there are just good.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

37 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Ostensibly RidiculousMember since 2020
3 years ago

I wanted so bad for the White Sox to overpay for him…

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

I’m not sure the Mets were going to let him go. But this is a good example of the difference between paying for a difference maker like Nimmo and throwing away money on mid-level free agents like Benintendi. Who do you think is happier right now with their outfield signings, the Mets or the White Sox?

Ostensibly RidiculousMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Exactly.

It’s like flying to an important work conference and spending $750 for a middle seat on a flight that leaves at 2am, transfers 3 times, has an overnight layover, charges for snacks, and then loses your luggage.
While insisting that $1,000 was too much for first class on a direct, non-stop 10am flight.

But Reinsdorf will call Cohen stupid and bad at business.

O'KieboomerMember since 2021
3 years ago

Tell me you haven’t booked a flight recently without doing so explicitly…

carterMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  O'Kieboomer

Could of said “Tell me you haven’t booked a flight recently without doing so ostensibly”

dezreMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  carter

While we’re being pedantic, could “have” said…

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

Wait, what?

A few years ago, no one would have believed you if you told them that Brandon Nimmo would get $162 million in free agency.”

If you told me that after 2018 or 2020 I absolutely would have believed it. Do you know how hard it is to find a prototypical leadoff hitter like that? Since 2017, the only players who have OBPs higher than him are guys who hit for so much power they’re better off in the #2 slot (Trout, Soto, Freeman, etc). The only other guys I can think about that are remotely like him in this regard are Arraez, McNeil, and Brantley, and he’s been better than all of them. The only concern about his has ever been his ability to stay healthy.

I know this is kind of the point of the article, but how is it that people were still sleeping on Brandon Nimmo going into this year?

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Because walks are boring, and an enormous contingent of fans still value a player’s offensive contribution based on his AVG and HR.

synco
3 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

Yeah I think a lot of fans weigh players based on their fantasy value.

Last edited 3 years ago by synco
David Klein
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I dunno that he meant going into this year but super early in his career when people were calling him a fourth OFer? Also him being so injury prone early in his career didn’t suggest he’d get an eight year deal. I think most felt Conforto would get something like that down the road and its amazing how their career have gone in opposite directions.

DylanMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

Pretty much every year of his since 2017, other than 2019, was pointing towards eventually getting this kind of contract. He was worth 4.8 WAR in 2018. In 2019, even with the injuries, he still was clearly a solid player. He was terrific in 2020. And he put up 3.4 WAR in just 92 games in 2021, which is good enough that some team was absolutely going to take a chance on him.

He’s pretty clearly been this guy for over 5 years now, since his first (almost) full year in the majors.

Last edited 3 years ago by Dylan
TulkasMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think a lot of it has to do with folks not realizing he’s actually good at defense, and not realizing how much time he’d missed with injury. I think folks have realized for a while now that he’s a really good hitter, but the context of what that actually meant didn’t really occur. It’s only recently that he’s become an actually good CF defender. I also think a lot of fans don’t fully realize how hard it is to find a player that is above average at both sides of the ball at that position. I think it’s the hardest place on the diamond to fill (except for maybe catcher).

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Tulkas

I like this answer. Gives people a lot more credit than I was doing before.

DylanMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I was going to say something similar. I think (hope?) it’s just a matter of underestimating how long ago 2018 was. Because ever since then, that is pretty much the kind of contract I would have expected him to eventually get, and those expectations haven’t changed much.

BubbaMember since 2016
3 years ago

I’m not sure how it happened, but he also went from fringy corner outfielder to above average center fielder over the last few years!

EonADSMember since 2024
3 years ago
Reply to  Bubba

This is something that needs closer examination. New article idea?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Bubba

He was always pretty good in a corner, but a lot of guys who are good in a corner are fringy center fielders, and that described him before. Now, he’s either average or above average, depending on how you look at it.

I think a lot of it was that once he got more reps in center field, his routes started to improve. If you take a look at his statcast page and the Statcast Outfielder Jump section, you’ll notice that he was within range of average on his routes basically every year but it slowly, slowly started to tick up. He was plus in on his routes starting in 2021 and he’s been great this year. His reaction has been consistently miserable and his burst has been consistently average (although this year and in 2018 it was very good).

hurricanexyzMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  Bubba

I believe that his defense improved a lot when he started playing deeper

But this year it’s seemed to take another step forward, he’s been making highlight-reel plays virtually every day. The Mets announcers think that it has something to do with his first step instincts improving.

b_pittMember since 2023
3 years ago
Reply to  hurricanexyz

This helped him tremendously. I started noticing him playing deeper towards the end of 2021 and his statcast OAA percentile ranks has gone from 14 in the shortened 2020 season, to 89 in 2021, 90 in 2022 and 95 early this season. Playing deeper better utilizes his speed moving in while not getting burnt over his head. He also plays pretty fearless in center and puts his body on the line. His arm is the only thing holding him back from being elite. And I wish he would steal bases more often.

darren
3 years ago

The phrase “Well, the joke’s on those eyebrow raisers” needs to be used more often.

darren
3 years ago

I wasn’t surprised to see him get $160 million (especially given the other deals this year), I just thought it would be more like a 6 year deal. Coming off a 5 WAR year, I’m a little surprised he didn’t get even more.

David Klein
3 years ago

My favorite player on the Mets it really is amazing how he gets better at something every year he’s really become an excellent defensive player the last few years. Thank goodness the Reds medical staff put the kibosh on the Nimmo for Bruce trade in 2016.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
3 years ago

There aren’t many players in the game who are as proficient at every phase of the game as Nimmo and he just keeps getting better at every phase each year. What a pleasure it is to watch him play.

darren
3 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

Just him and Mookie, as Leo Morgenstern pointed out in an article last year. Maybe they should give Nimmo a shot at playing SS?

Jason BMember since 2017
3 years ago
Reply to  darren

Then the Padres would trade for him

RonnieDobbs
3 years ago

It is amusing to see how FanGraphs cheers for their guys over their entire careers. Never able to predict anything of value it is about the marathon of celebrating the intermittent success where they can try to create it. Juicing up those bases lol. In reality he is doing what he always does which is mediocre offensive production. A guy who took less walks and swung the bat better would be more valuable. Charlie Blackmon is juicing up the bases to a similar extent and nobody is pretending that it matters. That is a bad contract despite the SSS. There might not be a better example of the failures of modern metrics than Nimmo. Completely replaceable but overvalued. He has magically become a better fielder recently lol.

darren
3 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

I’m open to new ideas that go against the conventional wisdom, but you’ve got to be able to do better than this. Charlie Blackmon has a .385 OBP playing half his games in Coors. Nimmo has a .419 OBP playing half his games in Citi Field. And since the article refers to “juicing up the bases” as a consistent skill, you might also compare their OBPs from the past 3 years: .384 for Nimmo to .337 for Blackmon.

bootydonger
3 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

Who is Brandon Nimmo replaceable with?

David Klein
3 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

You must be a wfan caller and or listener

David Klein
3 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

A career 130 ish wRC+ is bad?

Jon L.Member since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

I’m pretty sure a genius like ronniedobbs will tell you to get your head out of the sand with this weird “wRC+” nonsense and use a real statistic like rbis.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

Obviously the answer is “Coors field makes all statistics big” but I am thankful you pointed out to me that Charlie Blackmon has been “not impossibly bad” so far this year. (That doesn’t mean he is good given that he can’t play defense or run but at least he’s average)

sugarberg
3 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

Comparing two players based on a single skill when one of those players is valuable precisely because he adds value with multiple skills would already be a dubious proposition. But the fact that the player you chose is not remotely comparable even in that cherrypicked skill elevates this comment from flawed to hilarious.

Jason BMember since 2017
3 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

magic maj-ik ] n. 1. Something Ronnie doesn’t fully understand and is not inclined to take the time to learn about.

ezgoer89
3 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

I agree 100%. Nimmo is a joke and the epitome of the modern ball player.

Rich Rieders
3 years ago

The one aspect this article leaves out is his defense.

Nimmo went from a soon to be converted to left fielder to GG caliber defender seemingly overnight.

Last edited 3 years ago by Rich Rieders
BurleighGrimesMember since 2020
3 years ago

I have really loved watching Brandon Nimmo play and improve year after year. It’s cool to see guys who are raw in part due to having relatively few reps as youngsters (in Nimmo’s case bc he’s from Wyoming) make good on their promise. Drafting Nimmo so high was a huge risk on the Mets part, so kudos to their drafting and development teams and especially to Brandon himself for taking a super raw kid with great speed and a terrific batting eye and turning him into a legit year in, year out star caliber player.