Braves Continue Trade-Happy Offseason with Chris Sale Acquisition

Eric Canha-USA TODAY Sports

With nearly every trade, you can expect fans of one side or the other to come away wondering where their GM went wrong. You can probably hear the complaints in your head, because you’ve almost certainly made them at one point or another yourself. We gave up those guys? For this one? Was there something else in it for us? What was he thinking?!?

It’s much rarer for both sides to have that reaction, because usually conventional wisdom tilts one way or the other. But the Braves and Red Sox might have accomplished it this past week:

So in honor of sports talk radio and breathless questions about what could possibly be going through people’s heads, let’s examine both sides through the same lens.

What were the Braves Thinking?!?

Come on. Chris Sale? He’s washed! His first “healthy” season since 2019 was last year, and he still only managed 20 starts. They were solid starts, don’t get me wrong – Sale will probably be capable of striking out 30% of opposing batters when the heat death of the universe arrives – but he’s going to be 35 this year, and he’s coming off of a 4.30-ERA season. What’s more, he’s only around for one year – or two if the Braves pick up a $20 million club option for 2025.

When you pitch Sale that way, he doesn’t really sound like a fit for the Braves. An older, oft-injured pitcher to pair with their young core? It feels like mismanagement, especially for a team that was already thin in the rotation. No one is acquiring Chris Sale to fill out innings; his health history precludes that.

That’s not what Atlanta is adding Sale for, though. As potent as the Braves’ offense was, they went into last year’s playoffs wobbling on the pitching side. Even with the benefit of extra rest days thanks to the novel postseason schedule, Bryce Elder made a playoff start – 2.2 innings, six earned runs. That was their third starter; playoff teams need four if they last more than a round.

The Braves were clearly aware of this shortcoming heading into the offseason. They reportedly pursued Aaron Nola to address their need, though he ended up staying in Philadelphia. They didn’t follow that up by swooping in on any of the top tier of free agents, but their desire was clear.

This makes a lot of sense to me. Look at Atlanta’s roster. It’s primed for a playoff push, and has that one obvious weakness. One way or another, it would be strange to go into the offseason with this team, with all its obvious strengths, and not spend resources addressing the elephant in the room.

If you’re looking at it exclusively through the lens of how Atlanta will line up in the 2024 playoffs, adding Sale starts to make more sense. I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect a full season out of him. The Braves are surely aware of that, though, and they have plenty of fifth starter types to fill in for him in the regular season. You can never have enough pitching, or so the saying goes. But that’s less true when we’re talking about enough pitching to win some games 6-5 or 9-7 and hang onto the NL East behind a historically great offense.

Pitchers with Sale’s upside don’t exactly grow on trees. Could Blake Snell or Jordan Montgomery fill that role? Sure, but neither of them are on the Braves right now, and after all their payroll-raising shenanigans earlier in the winter, they might not have room for those salaries. Sale fits a lot of things the Braves are looking for: reasonable salary outlay thanks to the Red Sox covering $17 million of his salary, short-term commitment, and the potential to make a difference on a full-strength playoff roster.

The cost? Vaughn Grissom, who didn’t really have a spot on the Braves after they added Jarred Kelenic in the aforementioned trade bonanza. He didn’t really have a spot even before that, to be honest; Atlanta made noise about moving him to the outfield, but he’s an infielder by trade. Aside from spelling Orlando Arcia when he was injured, they left him in the minors last year; at this point, I think it’s fair to say that he’s a second baseman who can moonlight at other positions only in case of emergency.

Personally, I probably would have stuck with Grissom and spent the money that went out the door in their Kelenic pursuit on a pitcher instead. But I understand where they’re coming from. Given the moves that had already happened, Grissom was more of a luxury than a necessity; David Fletcher can fill in for his infield backup role, and Ozzie Albies squarely blocked Grissom from an everyday role. If they didn’t think he could play left field and out-hit Kelenic, this series of moves makes sense to me. I happen to disagree – I’m down on Kelenic’s ability to make enough contact to put up consistently good offensive numbers – but I think Atlanta’s decision comes down to deciding that Grissom was surplus and turning him into something more helpful for 2024.

What Were the Red Sox Thinking?!?

This one’s a little bit easier: The Red Sox are acting like they don’t plan on making the playoffs in 2024. Their rotation was spotty to begin with; we’re penciling in newly signed Lucas Giolito as their number one starter, but he hasn’t fit that bill in years. Brayan Bello and Nick Pivetta are good but not great; Kutter Crawford and Tanner Houck might be a step below that. Losing Sale, even if they were only counting on half a season’s worth of starts from him, puts a lot of stress on that group.

If that sounds dire, wait until you hear about the other side of the ball. There are some highlights, no doubt. Rafael Devers is still great. Masataka Yoshida didn’t display the power Boston hoped for in his first season in the majors, but he still put up a reasonable batting line. Triston Casas and Jarren Duran look like keepers. But that’s only part of a team, not the whole thing, and the roster gets pretty thin after that.

Another way of looking at it: If you’re trading for a guy who couldn’t find playing time on the Braves, that’s one thing. Grissom might be pretty good! But the Red Sox also traded for a guy who couldn’t find playing time on the Cardinals, Tyler O’Neill. That’s a sign of a thin roster. Boston’s farm system is both deep and good – we had it as the second-best in baseball at the end of the season – but those reinforcements probably won’t arrive in 2024.

When you add all of those things up, things click a little bit. Sale wasn’t going to make the difference between making or missing the playoffs, because even with him in the fold, Boston was probably the worst team in the AL East. Unlike the Braves, the Red Sox have a place to play Grissom, and his timeline fits much better with theirs; he has less than a year of service time despite debuting in 2022, which means he’ll be in Boston for quite a while.

That’s not an exciting conclusion. I’m sure the Red Sox didn’t plan on turning Sale into a guy who might end up as a utility infielder when they signed him to a contract extension before the 2020 season. But given how the rest of their team looks, and given Sale’s uncertain health, this was too good of a deal to pass up. Grissom might not have been very useful to Atlanta, but few teams have as many talented hitters as the Braves. The Red Sox can figure out if Grissom’s projections – a 110 wRC+ – are the real deal, and it’s not even a disaster if he’s worse than that, because they have several middle infield prospects coming up behind him.

So there you have it – this trade might not be exciting, but it advances the agenda for both sides in 2024. The Braves want to win another World Series. The Red Sox want to start building towards the future. Given those goals, both Sale and Grissom were wearing the wrong uniforms. Now they aren’t. Sometimes it’s just that easy.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Twitter @_Ben_Clemens.

141 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
CC AFCmember
3 months ago

Pouring one out for all the Braves fans who spent the past year asking “could we get [really good player] for Grissom?” and “who says no to Grissom for [really good player]?” The answers, apparently, were “no” and “the other team.”

Last edited 3 months ago by CC AFC
v2miccamember
3 months ago
Reply to  CC AFC

I don’t know, I think following the 2023 spring training that cemented Orlando Arcia as our starting Shortstop, a lot of Braves fans had to a long hard re-evaluation of Grissom. He projects to be an above league average hitter, but less than ideal fielder. That’s not worth nothing, but it certainly isn’t the kind of top flight prospect that lands you a team’s best player (except when the Braves are dealing with the Oakland A’s, apparently)

Although, that leads me to another question. How many times has an organization been willing to trade their top prospect, and then said prospect actually turned into a superstar somewhere else. At the time of the Fernando Tatis trade, he was a fresh international signing that had yet to play a game in the White Sox system. Meanwhile, but the time Juan Soto and Ronald Acuna Jr. started generating some noise in prospects lists, there was no way either one of their teams were trading them for anything. Yoan Mancada was the top prospect in the Red Sox system, but they gladly sent him to the White Sox in the Chris Sale trade. Six years later, he has flashed, but never really developed into that perennial all star Chicago was hoping for.

TKDCmember
3 months ago
Reply to  v2micca

I agree with your second take. When the Red Sox traded Moncada, my first thought was that he must not be as good as the scouts think. Teams have more info than the prospecting class on their players, and seem to do a great job of not giving away future stars. I think this is especially true for position players.

However, I’m not even sure Grissom is the Braves best prospect and another thing that gets overblown is org prospect rankings. Grissom isn’t technically a prospect, so he doesn’t get ranked, but if he did, would he be better than fringe top-100? I don’t think so. And a fringe top-100 prospect, especially one that’s more of a low-ceiling type, just isn’t going to net you much.

sadtrombonemember
3 months ago
Reply to  v2micca

The Braves’ best prospect is either guy who was selected as the 24th pick in the last draft (meaning that 23 teams passed on him) or a guy who was last seen putting up negative fWAR in 5 MLB starts. It’s a rough group, although for a good reason (they’re in the majors or traded for guys in the majors). And I think this pretty well solves the problem of what Grissom was worth.

awalnohamember
3 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I agree. 21 teams passed on Mike Trout which tells you for all prospects it’s about their perceived value. Grissom best case is probably Ben Zoberist. But who knows maybe he’ll be Derek Jeter.

sadtrombonemember
3 months ago
Reply to  awalnoha

He’s not gonna be Ben Zobrist or Derek Jeter. If they’re lucky he’ll be Cubs-era Ben Zobrist. Or Derek Jeter when he was playing out the end of his contract. Like, when they were 36 or 37.

That’s the best case scenario. The worst case scenario is that he’s like Miguel Andujar, a guy who got really lucky by outperforming his batted ball stats early in his career, but who never figured out how to play the infield. I realize that’s a fairly wide band (he could be a 3-win player, he could be below replacement level) but the idea that he’s going to start putting up MVP-caliber seasons…that’s not happening.

mikejuntmember
3 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

When I evaluate players like this, I often find myself considering whether my team would ever be interested in the player or a player with their profile. Now, my team is the Dodgers, so that sets a pretty high bar, but that’s also basically the bar for the Braves, and not that far from the bar for most playoff teams.

There’s a term that used to be more common in prospect evaluation that I think is really useful: second-division starter. I think that’s what Vaughn Grissom probably is. Is a team with a really good roster likely to be interested in him? I don’t think so, because he’s too limited. If he had any kind of an arm, he’d be a valuable Chris Taylor type. But lacking the arm for spot SS duty and any outfield ability, he’s too limited of a player. He’s good enough at baseball to be a respectable starter on a non-playoff team and will probably have a few seasons where he’s among the better players on his team and someone who gets rumored in trade deadline acquisitions by an actual playoff team – but he’s not a player you build around because his niche is so narrow – he’s not a first-class bat at 2b, and he’s not defensively flexible.

Now, the thing that makes for an interesting contrast there is that I think this probably also describes Jared Kelenic. But that’s basically what he’s doing for the Braves – filler. These guys may turn out to be good enough to start for the Reds or Royals or Rockies for the better part of a decade, but they’re not what you want to build a contending team around.

I think there’s something to the rubric that if you want to be a quality core piece of a competitive team, you need to have one of 3 traits:

A well-above average bat for the position
The same value as the above because of superlative defense and a merely average bat
An average bat and the ability to play half the positions on the field

Those are the 3 kids of players that playoff teams are built around. The other guys are just filler, and they may be useful filler, but they’re never last.

Last edited 3 months ago by mikejunt
Alex Remingtonmember
3 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

My hopeful comps for Vaughn Grissom: Mark Loretta, Ronnie Belliard, Juan Uribe, 2B/3B types who hung around the league for a decade and a half and put up 20 career WAR.

Not enough glove for short but probably enough for second or third; decent contact ability and *some* pop with strong age-relative-to-league for his offense performance. I doubt he becomes a star, but I think the likelihood that he hangs around for a decade is pretty good.

jason shuremember
3 months ago
Reply to  awalnoha

I get the thrust of your comment, that players are unpredictable, and agree. But Zobrist was top 5 in all of mlb (by WAR) for 2009-2011. crazy sounding stat, but true. It’s very very hard to see Grissom matching that!

Matt
3 months ago
Reply to  v2micca

Picking nits, but Moncada wasn’t the Red Sox top prospect at the time of the trade. But Benintendi’s career has been a bit disappointing as well.

TKDCmember
3 months ago
Reply to  Matt

That’s up for debate. FG lists Moncada first for 2017. I know others had Benintendi. That’s not even really a nit.

Smiling Politelymember
3 months ago
Reply to  v2micca

I don’t think you can frame this question generically/devoid of context.

Would ATL trade several years of Vaughn Grissom for a shot at Chris Sale as a low leverage starter/closer in the WS if you’ve got Arcia signed for life for pennies on the dollar? Yup.

Would the Yankees trade several years of Jasson Dominguez for a shot at Chris Sale with only Aaron Judge on the longterm OF roster? Feels less likely.

It’s not just “fear of the guy turning into a HoFer”–realtime needs are going to take priority (how close you are to winning a WS, roster needs, etc.).

Last edited 3 months ago by Smiling Politely