Buxton, Twins Combine on Fascinating Extension
For years, 2022 has loomed large in the Minnesota Twins’ long-term planning. Their two franchise cornerstones, Byron Buxton and José Berríos, were both due to hit free agency after the 2022 season, which meant the team constructed many of its long-term plans with that year as a pivot point. Even when they traded Berríos for prospects at the 2021 deadline, next year still looked like a potential last hurrah with the current core before turning the team over to new blood.
Forget that idea. On Sunday, the Twins and Buxton agreed to a seven-year, $100 million contract extension that will keep him in Minnesota through the 2028 season; it also includes a full no-trade clause. The gem of Minnesota’s last rebuild will now be the face of the franchise throughout the peak of his career.
2021 was a microcosm of Buxton’s career to date. He was electric when he played, batting .306/.358/.647 with 19 home runs in only 254 plate appearances. He clubbed 19 doubles, stole nine bases (against just a single time getting caught), and channeled his aggression on pitches in the zone without flailing wildly. In the field, he was as good as ever, which is pretty darn good. Buxton is perennially one of the best center fielders in baseball, and this year was no exception. Every defensive metric agreed he was one of the best per-game defenders in the majors. Combine that with his offense, and he was worth 4.2 WAR in only 61 games.
But his health has been a concern, to say the least. Buxton has only played 100 games in a season once, in 2017. He’s hurt himself in all manner of ways — slamming into walls, getting hit by pitches, soft-tissue injuries, you name it. To the extent that health is a skill, it’s one that Buxton has yet to demonstrate, and that’s worrisome for a player who reached the majors in 2015.
In a nutshell, Buxton is either hurt or great. 2021 was by far his best season with the bat, but he’s shown flashes before. Projection systems don’t think he’s going to repeat last season’s production, but they like his offense far more than his career 99 wRC+ line. Steamer pegs him for a 123 2RC+ in 2022, and look at this ZiPS deliciousness:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SB | OPS+ | DR | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | .269 | .311 | .544 | 316 | 53 | 85 | 23 | 2 | 20 | 52 | 16 | 12 | 127 | 7 | 3.1 |
| 2023 | .265 | .307 | .544 | 298 | 49 | 79 | 22 | 2 | 19 | 49 | 15 | 10 | 126 | 7 | 2.8 |
| 2024 | .267 | .310 | .548 | 292 | 49 | 78 | 21 | 2 | 19 | 49 | 15 | 10 | 128 | 6 | 2.8 |
| 2025 | .265 | .309 | .530 | 283 | 46 | 75 | 20 | 2 | 17 | 46 | 15 | 10 | 124 | 6 | 2.6 |
| 2026 | .262 | .306 | .524 | 271 | 43 | 71 | 19 | 2 | 16 | 42 | 14 | 8 | 121 | 5 | 2.3 |
| 2027 | .258 | .299 | .492 | 256 | 39 | 66 | 17 | 2 | 13 | 37 | 12 | 7 | 111 | 5 | 1.8 |
| 2028 | .248 | .287 | .463 | 242 | 35 | 60 | 15 | 2 | 11 | 33 | 11 | 6 | 101 | 4 | 1.3 |
Sure, Buxton gets tiny playing time projections — reasonably so given his history. If he does put a full season together one of these years, though, it would likely be an excellent one, and his contract takes that into account.
The top line of this deal looks like a good rate for Minnesota. The contract will pay him $10 million in 2022, then $15 million for each of the subsequent six years. The length of the deal offers Buxton protection if his injury issues eat into his production, but $15 million a year doesn’t generally get you someone with this kind of all-around talent. A healthy Buxton is a borderline MVP candidate in an average-rate-stat year, not a decent position player.
To compensate Buxton for that fact, he and the Twins agreed on an interesting contract structure. In each year of his deal, Buxton can add a hefty sum to his salary based on MVP voting. Should he win the award, he’ll receive an $8 million bonus that year. Finishing second gets him $7 million, third $6 million, and so on, down to $3 million for a 6th-10th place finish. You don’t need me to tell you this; that’s a healthy kicker. Brandon Lowe finished 10th in MVP voting this year on the back of a 5.2 WAR season. Buxton’s not a lock to do that, obviously, but if he does start racking up 6-WAR seasons, he’ll get paid for it.
The Twins threw in some further incentives for health. Buxton will receive $500,000 for plate appearance milestones — 502, 533, 567, 600, and 625. Aside from making my brain hurt by varying the number of PAs between incentives, the main point of this deal is to give Buxton more money if he stays on the field. In a hypothetical season where Buxton competes for an MVP award, he could take home upwards of $25 million dollars, a salary befitting an MVP.
Thinking about how that kind of salary fits into a team budget is interesting. It’s akin to a binary deal — $15 million if Buxton doesn’t make a huge impact on the team’s fortunes, and $18-25 million if he does. Luckily for the team, that’s positively correlated with their success. If Buxton plays well enough to hit the top end of his salary range, it’s far more likely that the team does well. That generally means more gate receipts and a higher chance at playoff games, which in turn means more money to spend on Buxton’s higher salary. It’s a virtuous circle, though it’s of course possible for Buxton to play badly in a Twins playoff run, or play well in a rough season.
Still, this deal tends to link Buxton’s success with the team’s. That means that the team can essentially flex spend; they can spend up to what they’re willing to pay in a down season without worrying too much about Buxton’s contract incentives. If he hits them, great! They’re unlikely to come back to bite the club, which is a nifty feature in a contract for an injury-prone star.
How different is this deal from a more standard “here’s your money, go play hard” type? I tried to come up with a rough approximation. If you do the “add-up-the-WAR” method of contract valuation and account for the year of arbitration Buxton is forgoing, this deal looks almost perfectly on-market. I’ve used a starting point of $7.3 million per win (ZiPS has been using $7.2 million this offseason), but you can vary that number slightly and end up with similar results.
For someone with plate appearance projections in the low 300s, that’s a strange way of looking at things. ZiPS projects Buxton to produce nearly 5 WAR per 600 plate appearances over the course of this deal. If he accumulated 550 plate appearances in each of the next seven seasons, he’d merit a deal worth something like $200 million. He’d also hit roughly $35 million in incentives, depending on how awards voting went. That’s very unlikely to happen, but it’s certainly within the range of possible outcomes — it’s not as though Buxton has to get hurt every year.
To account for the uncertainty, I came up with a very simple rule of thumb. I gave Buxton a 15% chance of reaching 600 plate appearances in a given year (slightly lower in the final two years of the deal), which let me approximate the value of the playing time incentives. Then, I fitted a WAR distribution to his central projections — basically, that works out to him making an average of $6 million if he outperforms his per-PA projections and also plays a full season, though of course the odds of turning in that type of performance decline as he ages.
In all, Buxton projects to earn an average of $6.5 million from his incentives. That seems tiny! If you believe my approximations, however, there’s a 35% chance that he never even reaches 600 plate appearances in a single year, and the PA bonuses below that aren’t enough to push him over the top. It’s also hard to have a high MVP finish without playing a full season, which works against him. If the Twins had simply added $6.5 million to the contract — actually, let’s just say $10 million to ward against my assumptions being too conservative — no one would look at the deal much differently than the current headlines.
To me, that’s the sign of a well-structured incentive. Most of the time, it won’t cost the Twins very much. When Buxton does cash in, the team will be happy to pay — they’re getting far more out of him than the median projection in those years. If he ends up putting together a string of abbreviated seasons with one MVP-caliber spike in the middle, the deal will compensate him correctly for that. If I haven’t already made it clear, I love what the Twins did here. They used incentives cleverly to produce a deal that makes sense for both sides.
Buxton is now the only big, long-term guarantee on Minnesota’s books, but they have a bevy of players ready to help him. Max Kepler has an option that could keep him under team control through 2024; Jorge Polanco could be a Twin through ‘25. Behind them, the team has early-arb or pre-arb players like Luis Arraez and Alex Kirilloff, as well as a pile of interesting but unproven pitchers. Finally, they’ve got prospects — we currently rank their farm system 10th in baseball, and plenty of those prospects will be ready for big league action in the next year or two.
The Twins are far from a finished product. They’re going to need a lot of pitching to compete for playoff berths; their current rotation is firmly in the “interesting” rather than “excellent” camp. They’ll also need to pair a few more hitters with Buxton, at least in the long run; Josh Donaldson can’t carry that weight alone, and his contract is up after 2023 in any case.
Despite that, this extension goes a long way towards explaining the Twins’ intentions next year and beyond. Previously, the team’s set of long-term commitments was nonexistent; if they wanted to tilt back into a tear-down-and-rebuild phase after this year, however ill-intentioned it might look to outside observers, the money would allow it. Now, they have too solid of a core for that to make sense. From that perspective, this deal is everything a Twins fan could ask for — and that’s before we consider what might happen if Buxton spikes an MVP season or two down the line.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
> You don’t need me to tell you this; that’s a healthy kicker. Brandon Lowe finished 10th in MVP voting this year on the back of a 5.2 WAR season. Buxton’s not a lock to do that, obviously, but if he does start racking up 6-WAR seasons, he’ll get paid for it.
I mean… not really? $8m is obviously a big bonus in the context of bonuses generally… but in the context of this deal it’s really not anything much. If Buxton wins an MVP he’ll either make $18m or $23m in that season. Which is very cheap for a season of that caliber.
“Very cheap” is a stretch – Ohtani just won the MVP making $3 million, and even Harper is making “only” ~$27.5 million per year, only a tick above Buxton’s max potential earnings year. And especially in the context of Buxton’s base salary, the potential bonuses are huge. He can basically up his salary by 75% in any given year based on his performance. Really cool deal for both sides!
Centerfield Tulo
“You take that back right now!”
-Every Twins fan in the world who has ever existed
Centerfield Mauer?
I’m not proud of myself for doing this
If he’s centerfield Mauer, he’s got another 40 or so WAR coming. I’d take that.
Eric Davis 2.0 (upgraded from version 1.0 by transplanting Devon White’s glove).
I’d never wish Eric Davis’s woes on any baseball player. Between the lacerated kidney and cancer he really got put through the ringer before we even consider the “normal” baseball injuries.
Excellent, we can pair him with “3rd base Tulo” Josh Donaldson. All we need now is to bring MikeCarlo Stanton into the fold and we will have achieved Tulo Bingo
Is the value of WAR determined by current player salaries? If so, isn’t $7.2M per WAR understated, given that the players are generally underpaid as a result of the CBA?
The value of WAR at FanGraphs has typically been determined by looking at the open market value of WAR (aka free agent contracts and extensions), not by total player salaries.
There’s actually a good argument the value of WAR is being overstated since the only reason teams can pay a guy like Scherzer $40m+ a year is because they are paying so little to WAR generating young players under the rules of the CBA.
There’s also a good argument that the $/WAR value assigned to players should not assume a linear relationship between WAR and salary since a single 4 WAR player is more valuable than four 1 WAR players, for example.
Well said. I would like to see how Dan arrived, but I trust his WAR figure more than anything else I’ve seen on FG since they had it at $4MM. But then they started arbitrarily adding .5MM a year to the cost per win with no data to support it, and topped out claiming $9MM a win. Dan doesn’t do anything without running numbers and simulations, so his 7.2 feels like it’s probably arrived at from a fairly sophisticated deep dive, not winging it. Really happy to have someone on staff revisit this as Dan did, and though I trust him, would love a peak under the hood.
I kinda love this one for both sides. Buxton gets security, and he and the team kind of split the benefit of the upside scenarios. And of course I get to keep watching him play.
This is a no-brainer deal for Buxton, I think. This kind of security for a guy who has been hurt roughly half the time is something and bad for about half of that…that’s really good for him.
For the Twins, I think their back was against the wall. Center fielders who can both hit adequately and defend center field well are pretty rare. You got Luis Robert, Trent Grisham, Harrison Bader (probably), Ramon Laureano, and Buxton. That’s about it. Maybe Starling Marte keeps up his defense, or Aaron Hicks or Lorenzo Cain or Kevin Kiermaier get healthy, or Daulton Varsho takes the next step. But I think that this extension reflects that market scarcity, figuring that there’s no way they’ll be able to find a center fielder who they trust if he leaves. There is a decent chance they just gave away $100M because he can’t seem to stay healthy but I think in the end the downside of him leaving was worse than the downside of him never being healthy again.
Buxton hasn’t been bad much at all. He’s has 2 total ‘bad’ seasons (2015 and 2018) representing 74 out of the 493 total games he’s played in his career.
Even in a year where he had an 86 wRC+ he was a net positive with the glove and on the bases and was on pace for over 2.5 WAR (above average).
And while I do think CF is a relatively scarce position, I think you can add several names to your potential 2 way CF list:
-Bellinger who has an MVP and is a strong defender in CF but looked lost at the plate until the playoffs last year.
-Mullins who was worthy of down ballot MVP votes.
-Reynolds had 9 OAA in CF last year (though other D metrics don’t love him).
-Marsh could grow into a plus player on both sides of the ball.
There’s also really no reason to limit the conversation to guys with good defense as long as the defense is passable and the bat makes up for it like Trout, Springer, Reynolds, Marte (prior to the uptick), etc.
Right, there are plenty of guys who are fringy in CF but make up for it with the bat. Reynolds, Springer, Mullins, and Trout are the obvious examples. I’m a little worried that Bellinger is broken.
I am a big Buxton fan. Irrationally so. I just have a hard time seeing this contract ending up very poorly. Buxton could play 100 games a year (and he probably will, sigh) and still make value by WAR. And his upside is potentially the best player in the game. His 162 game war last year was 11.3! Does he do that? Almost assuredly no. But ever since he came back from an injury in 2020 it was like something clicked on his power stroke. Counting his bad start in 2020, he has 32 hrs in his last 389 PA. One HR every 12 PA apx. For reference last year Tatis hit a home run once every 13 PA. So if he is truly an elite power hitter, an elite defender, and an elite runner…well, jeez, he is probably a superstar
In terms of context, this might be my favorite move of the offseason so far:
– Twins are in an overall “window of contention”, even after last year’s epic face-plant. Though they traded Berrios, the return was strong and should be ready to help at the MLB level very soon.
– Buxton’s trade value was probably going to be dimes on the dollar with just one year until free agency, so neither a win-now or dump deal wouldn’t help the Twins either way.
– The outlay for the Twins is particularly low-risk. If Buxton is severely or permanently hurt, I’m sure they will be made whole by insurance. If he’s injured at the level he’s been injured over the last three years, he’s still a 3+ win player, which is a total bargain. If he’s healthy enough and successful enough for the bonuses to kick in, it’s still a great deal for the Twins.
– Also, a $14MM AAV is not going to push the Twins close to any payroll threshold, if for some reason that ever becomes an issue for them.
– Finally, Buxton himself gets (1) a nine-figure guarantee and (2) a full no-trade clause. Yes, the potential exists that he would have earned a much bigger payday overall, but I have to think his market value would remain depressed even with a best case, 160 game MVP caliber season in 2022 – his reputation as being injury-prone is so strong. I’d say it was less than a 50/50 proposition that Buxton would get a nine-figure FA deal at ANY point in the future, whether next offseason or sometime in the future if he had to take a pillow deal next year.
This is about the only way the Twins could’ve brought back Buxton and I would’ve been on board. It is enough money to get him to sign, but not so much that it is franchise crippling if he doesn’t work out or stay healthy. If he keeps producing and the Twins rebuild, he won’t be in an Arenado situation where you almost have to pay to get good prospects back, because the contract zeros his value.
Makes total sense for both sides, glad they did not fork over superstar money
In my head I thought of this extension as “Buxton gets paid in the manner in which all MLB players should logically get paid but never do because paying for actual performance is bad for the performers”.
You can’t do this across the board because it would cost teams an incredible amount of money when their players exceed expectations. No team would offer a deal that says “we’ll pay you the market free agency rate for $/WAR.” Teams operate within budgets and that simply would not work. These types of deals have always been a possibility. The reason they don’t exist is not because of the players.
Seems to make a lot of sense. The Twins aren’t paying him market rate per WAR. He’s getting paid below market rate based both on past performance and future projections, even given the limited playing time. They only pay more when he performs higher. And as mentioned above, they save on insurance premiums, only having to insure against the 100MM instead of 150MM or more. Easily a savings of a few million there.
If the Buxton deal is the example, seems like it would save teams money by not paying for below expected performance.
This is one where I have to respectfully disagree with TKDC and strongly agree with radivel..
Teams save massive amounts of money during players’ first six seasons.
Makes a lot of sense for both player and team and I’m happy to see it. If Buxton stays on the field and plays like he can— and there are very few players with a ceiling like his— he might get underpaid somewhat compared to what a player of that caliber could get on the open market, but he won’t exactly be hurting for money. Buxton gets financial security and can settle down in Minneapolis for a long while with the guaranteed money and a no-trade clause, which is an interesting twist. Between him, Luis Robert, and Riley Greene, there should be some scintillating center fielders in the AL Central for years to come.
This deal puts Twins beat writers in a tricky spot come awards season. They’ll have a direct say in whether someone they cover everyday makes many millions of dollars. Creates all sorts of bad incentives on both sides. Yes this is true with award bonuses in general but we’ve never seen them close to this big. They also go all the way down to a tenth place finish, leaving more room for down ballot chicanery. The BBWAA needs to look into this.
I’ve always kind of wondered about this problem. Do agents lobby writers for their clients? Bribe writers?
Well, bribery in this case would almost surely be a criminal offense that could land someone in prison. I’m not sure how that affects your thinking on how likely it would be to happen, but worth considering.
I think this is overthinking things.
‘Let’s vote for the player on my team’ bias that already exists is likely larger than ‘let’s consider the team’s finances.’
Case in point: Salisbury, “Phillies Insider for NBC”, put Tatis/Soto on 6th/7th for MVP. Harper ended up winning handily anyways, but sure looks like strategic voting, and this is not something we want to encourage.
“he could take home upwards of $25 million dollars, a salary befitting an MVP.”
No, $25 million dollars underpays an MVP by $15-25 million dollars.
On a one year deal, yes
He wasn’t going to get the $100m guarantee floor and also realize all the upside. Twins definitely get a bargain if he’s healthy and excellent. He still does pretty well, though.
I wasn’t referring to the deal as a whole, nor the riskiness of Buxton. Neither is the clause I took exception with. Any player who plays well enough to win the MVP in a year produced enough value to be worth $40-50 million in value that year.