Byron Buxton and September Service-Time Manipulations

(Photo: Keith Allison)
Blue Jays infielder Vladimir Guerrero Jr., who became the consensus No. 1 prospect in baseball once Ronald Acuña graduated, has recorded one of the top batting lines at Triple-A since his promotion to that level at the end of July. White Sox outfielder Eloy Jiménez, generally considered one of the game’s top five prospects, has actually been slightly more productive than Vlad Jr. during his own 200-plus plate appearances in the International League. Mets prospect Peter Alonso, meanwhile — who lacks the transcendent talent of the aforementioned players but also rates as a top-100 prospect — leads the minor leagues in homers and plays a position from which the Mets have gotten sub-replacement level production. All three have demonstrated some level of mastery over minor-league competition. None of them are likely to appear in the majors this year.
If the circumstances were different, one could understand. If the Jays or White Sox or Mets were in the midst of a playoff race and were adding veteran talent to complement their rosters, that would be one thing. That’s not the case, though. All three clubs possess sub-.500 records. All three have endured depressed attendance figures (down 24.7% in Toronto, 5.7% in Chicago, 7.4% in New York). All three are looking towards next year.
Despite this emphasis on the future and development, executives have found excuses not to recall any of aforementioned players, ranging from a lack of available playing time to defense (always defense) to checklists to which the public isn’t privy. If the formula holds, not only will Guerrero, Jiménez, and Alonso fail to appear in the majors this year, they also won’t break camp with their respective clubs at the beginning of next season. Instead, their teams will head north from spring training without them and then, a few weeks later in April, summon them to the big club — as soon as they’ve acquired what amounts to another year of control.
What’s happening with this particular group of young players isn’t uncommon, of course. We’ve been here before — with Evan Longoria in 2008, with David Price and Matt Wieters in 2009, with Mike Trout and Bryce Harper (2012), with George Springer (2014), with Kris Bryant and Maikel Franco (2015), and with Gleyber Torres (who at least was returning from a season-ending injury) and Acuña this year.
From a cutthroat, competitive standpoint, it makes sense. Acting in their own self-interest under the rules of the collective bargaining agreement, teams want to retain their best young players for longer while paying them as little as possible. The executives’ euphemisms are all the more tiresome, however, because fans have become conditioned to accept (or even defend) them, taking the sides of billionaires (the owners) against millionaires (if, in this case, they got a handsome signing bonus). The teams’ actions may not be illegal (though colleague Sheryl Ring offered a legal argument on their behalf concerning their postponed entry into the union). We’ve become hyperconscious of it in the wake of Bryant’s delayed arrival and subsequent grievance, which three years later remains unresolved.
The problem is, the subject of teams manipulating the service time of young players is diverting attention away from the games themselves and becoming it’s own story. It’s a bad look for the sport, particularly in a year where nearly one-third of the teams are noncompetitive by design, where leaguewide attendance is down 4.6% relative to 2017 and slated to finish below 30,000 per game for the first time since 2003.
Instead of any collective effort to address the problem, however, the sport has recently produced a novel kind of service-time manipulation — in this case, involving former consensus No. 1 prospect Byron Buxton.
Now in his fourth major-league season — one largely lost to injuries and, in the view of some, mismanagement — Buxton’s case of is different but still features many of the same justifications and (in this case) contradictions from front-office personnel. Having appeared to arrive in 2017 after a pair of seasons full of promotions, demotions, and injuries, the center fielder produced a 16-homer, 29-steal, 3.5-WAR campaign last year that helped the Twins to a Wild Card berth — their first trip to the postseason since 2010 and the first ever by a team that had lost 100 games the previous year. In the midst of it, he earned not only a Gold Glove, but a Platinum one, as the league’s best defender at any position.
This year, meanwhile, has been a dismal one for Buxton, as chronic migraines, a fractured left big toe, and a left wrist strain have contributed to his hitting just .156/.183/.200 without a single homer in 28 games and 94 plate appearances at the major-league level, and just 64 games and 246 PA in all. If it wasn’t for bad luck, Buxton wouldn’t have no luck at all: he broke the toe in his first post-migraine rehab appearance, and apparently returned from the fracture too quickly and tried to play through it. At the end of the rehab for his toe injury, he was optioned; less than two weeks later, he injured his wrist, then reinjured it three games into his return.
Buxton’s overall numbers at Triple-A Rochester have been nothing spectacular (.272/.331/.456), but in 12 games since his last DL stint, he’s hit a scalding .365/.400/.596. Yet the Twins, who haven’t been at .500 since April 22, have decided to shut him down after Monday’s season finale rather than recall him, in part out of concern that Buxton is “playing through” a wrist injury that is “still lingering,” according to general manager Thad Levine. It’s likely not a coincidence, however, that Buxton is currently 13 days short of the 172 needed to reach a full season of major-league service time, his third. If he doesn’t get it in September, instead of reaching free agency after the 2021 season, he’ll be under club control through 2022.
Where does the time go?
Via TwinCities.com’s Mike Berardino, chief baseball officer Derek Falvey said last week regarding Buxton’s service-time situation, “That’s not something we’re factoring in. Honestly, the way we’ve approached it is: ‘What do we think is the best thing by all the players and ultimately how we build our team?’ We’re going to take that approach with this decision. No different.”
Yet here’s Levine a few days later, also via Berardino, from the same conversation in which he described the wrist problem:
“I think part of our jobs is we’re supposed to be responsible to factoring service time into every decision we make,” Levine said. “I still feel pretty resolute in saying that the other three factors were more present for us in this decision-making process than that. We wouldn’t be doing our jobs if we weren’t at least aware of service-time impacts on decisions we make.”
Upon reading that, I was apparently not the only one who thought of a classic Simpsons quote:

Levine’s other reasons include “on-field performance that goes beyond his raw statistics in the minors and a lack of playing time for him in the majors.” Of the wrist (which the Twins apparently have no plans to examine further) the GM told Berardino:
“I think he’s still progressing toward being healthy, but to his credit he’s playing through it right now,” Levine said. “I think this was an injury we knew wouldn’t resolve itself immediately. It’s a matter of what he feels comfortable playing through. To his credit, when we’ve asked him to play, he’s stepped up and played.”
So the Twins have asked the not-fully-healthy Buxton to play through his injuries, and he’s done so, daily. It counts as a credit to him, but… he needs to be sent home?
Teammate Miguel Sano, who endured his own six-week detour to the minors earlier this season after struggling in the wake of multiple injuries, spoke to Berardino about Buxton. “He told me he feels good. He’s been playing good, too.” Regarding Buxton’s potential shutdown, he said, “I don’t think that’s good. That would be tough for me and for him and his family. I think he needs to come here and finish strong and play the last month, and that’s it.”
Said pitcher Kyle Gibson, the Twins’ player representative:
“Something like this is a sensitive topic. Everybody wants to be mindful of the fact the owners and the GM are the ones that make the decisions, but we want to be mindful about Byron too. We know he’s a great player. We know he has the tools to be up here. He’s still a big leaguer and a teammate in our eyes.”
Regarding playing time, the Twins have gotten a very mixed set of results from the players who have filled in at center field. Jake Cave, a 25-year-old rookie, has made a team-high 42 starts there and played average defense; he’s hit .268/.316/.505 for a 115 wRC+ (tied for second on the team among players with at least 200 PA) in 66 games and 208 PA overall, marking him as a keeper. Twenty-five-year-old Max Kepler, the team’s regular right fielder, has made 41 starts in center and has also proved up to the task defensively. His overall production (.226/.316/.419 for a 97 wRC+) is adequate for the middle pasture but rather light for a corner, as is that of the primary beneficiary of his shift, Robbie Grossman (.259/.340/.362, 93 wRC+). Ryan LaMarre, a 29-year-old rookie who made 26 starts in center and hit .263/.321/.313 for a 74 wRC+, is now a member of the White Sox after being lost on waivers in July, while 26-year-old rookie Johnny Field, a waiver claim from the Rays in early August, is 1-for-20 in seven outfield starts at the three positions, including one in center. He’s hit .196/.235/.339 for a 54 wRC+ in 201 PA overall.
Nobody there is the second coming of Trout, so it shouldn’t be so hard to fit Buxton into playing time with Cave and Kepler, particularly with left fielder Eddie Rosario missing perhaps a week due to a right quad strain. Given his performance at Rochester, it would seem that there’s far more reason to promote Buxton, give him access to the major-league staff and facilities, and help him close the season on a positive note instead of a shutdown that would appear to come against his will.
Obviously, Buxton and his agents (B.B. Abbott and Al Goetz) aren’t happy with the Twins’ decision, and the possibility of a grievance to recover the lost service time exists. Via The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal:
“We will examine this against the rights provided to all players under the CBA,” Abbott told The Athletic on Saturday night. “Until then, we will let Twins fans form their own opinions about this decision.”
Added Tony Clark, the head of the Major League Players’ Association: “We will review all options with Byron and his representatives.”
“Levine said the Twins are ‘hopeful’ the issue will not wind up before a mediator this offseason, but he said the organization recognizes the need to “make amends” with Buxton and his agents in an effort to smooth over any tension.
“Their recourse has not been laid out to us,” Levine said. “They’re certainly entitled to whatever they think is in the best interest of Byron Buxton. From this day forward, I think we recognize a responsibility to make amends and that we’re going to need to invest in the relationship with Byron Buxton. We understand this is a blow to the player, a potential blow to the relationship.”
All of this seems rather pennywise and pound-foolish for a 63-74 team that ranks among the majors’ biggest disappointments this year, one that has long depended upon its ability to produce homegrown talent in order to contend, and one that has so conditioned its fans to fret over the Pohlad family’s bottom line that six-time All-Star, former AL MVP, and St. Paul native Joe Mauer has become a target for a segment of the fan base due to the size of his contract. Obviously, Buxton hasn’t fully met the lofty expectations that accompany being made the No. 2 pick of the 2012 draft, and anointed by Baseball America and other outlets as the game’s first- or second-best prospect for three straight years (2014-16). But he’s certainly flashed those abilities, consistently with his defense and intermittently at the plate, particularly in the second half of last season. For all of their investment in a player whom they consider a core piece of their future (including his $6 million signing bonus), the Twins have now created an adversarial relationship.
That’s a lousy way to run a ball club, and coupled with decisions like those involving Guerrero, Jiménez (whose agents have indicated that they may file a grievance on his behalf), and Alonso, it’s a lousy look for Major League Baseball and the players’ union, which coincidentally last week hired attorney and litigator Bruce Meyer to focus on negotiation and enforcement of the CBA, which expires in December 2021. Coupled with the dissatisfaction over the past winter’s free-agent freeze-out, service-time battles will certainly be a point of contention in negotiations.
There’s no easy solution to the issue. Even if the players secure the right to reduced levels of service time before arbitration and free agency — such as Mike Petriello’s 2015 suggestion to use 100 days as a service time threshold, to make it much more painful for a team to keep a prospect in the minors — teams will still attempt to find means by which secure extra control and to cloak such actions in baseball reasons, whether or not they sound as contradictory as those cited by the Twins’ brass.
The cycle of ridiculousness and rancor may continue, but that doesn’t mean the underlying circumstances can’t be improved.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
I’m definitely in favour of switching a “year” to somewhere around 100 days. Dump super-2 while you’re at it, and that just simplifies things. I’d even consider adding in a fixed age limit rule (ie. always a free agent going into your age-29 season or something), so that a slightly older guy like Alonso would be up now, since he wouldn’t be able to reach the 6 years before hitting that age limit anyways.
Now, maybe the Jays/Sox still keep Vlad/Eloy down through the middle of next year, since neither team is going to be competitive next year, but that’s not really any different than the guys who are kept down due to super-2 rules, so I don’t think it would make things worse than they are now.
Any threshold will produce similar behaviour, just shifted to a different part of the season.
The only way to eradicate this sort of thing is to make the benchmarks depend on exogenous factors only. Like age. For example, all players signed at 16 become major league free agents at age 28 (and arb-eligible at, say, age 25). Regardless of when they reached the majors.
How about, you can negotiate an end year along with the original offer, not to exceed 7 total years,? There is something to teams not wanting to invertst in a player who would depart once MLB eligible, but beyond that, this is just an owners cabal that Congress really should end.
NHL entry-level contracts expire in the third offseason after the player’s tenth NHL game. That’s pretty hard to game usefully.
This would make a lot of sense. For baseball it could be made a lot simpler; free agency 6 years after the player has played in one single pre-September game. So, when rosters expand Sept 1 you can call up whoever you want with no impact on service time. Once they play in any pre-September game, they hit arbitration after 3 offseasons, and then free agency after 6 offseasons. Simple, and almost impossible to game to any significant degree.
Not necessarily the point of the article but Buxton has been horrendous. By merit only one could argue he is not deserving to play major league baseball. There have (and will) be more egregious examples of manipulation but the Twins are not way out of line here IMHO.
Far worse players get called up for expanded rosters. I don’t see any reason he shouldn’t be on the roster especially given the base-running and defense. Every team would want him on their bench for that at least.
By merit only he deserves to be the starting center fielder on more than half the teams in the majors.
In 1000 PAs he has a 76 wRC+.
Did you mean to say he should be starting for half the AAA teams?
Billy Hamilton has a 71 wRC+ and he is often discussed as a 4A or platoon only player.
Do we really think the Twins wouldn’t prefer Buxton absolutely crushing MLB pitching and earning a huge contract extension?
They are playing the hand they were dealt.
I can’t figure out why you’re getting upvoted when what you’re saying is complete nonsense. Yes, Buxton has produced a 76 wRC+ thus far in the major leagues, and yet due to his superior base running and exceptional defense he’s been worth 4.6 wins above replacement during that time.
Maybe he’s got bot accounts. Or, the confused and concerned commenters that don’t understand baseball nor economics are swarming to vote down anything against their wrong opinions.
You can’t figure out that in an era of strikeouts where defense just doesn’t matter quite as much (or that you are trusting defensive metrics wayyy too much) that a 76 wRC+ from a full time player just plain sucks?
They’re not way out of line, except the little bit where they said it out aloud.
Totally agree. SSS should not be forgotten here at FG if nowhere else.
” in 12 games since his last DL stint, he’s hit a scalding .365/.400/.596″ I imagine that is less than 50 ABs.
So we should ignore an entire season in Triple A which, including these numbers, amounts to (.272/.331/.456), based on the most recent 50 ABs?!?!
Finally, the Twins are treating him like any other player, and they aren’t indulging his giant swoons with brief bouts of competance with everyday at bats. The best thing for Buxton is to get good and angry about not being in the majors, and work his rear-end off to get there again. Don’t blame the Twins.
If they were playoff-bound, do you think they’d stick with Johnny Field as a 4th OF, or would they perhaps give Buxton the call? Obviously, they would choose Buxton. He is clearly the better option.
If this wasn’t Byron Buxton, one the “Chosen Ones” by the baseball hierarchy, there wouldn’t be this debate. While he has teased everyone with an occasional sign that he can actually hit pitching, not just major league pitching but even Florida State League pitching, for the most part he has shown four great skills and, unfortunately very little of the one that counts the most. This is made all the worse by the fact that the gurus put a 65 hit tool on him and they don’t like to be embarrassed so they try to shift the blame to the Twins. This is absolutely the correct move for the Twins to make. Buxton may never be able to hit but the chances are better that will do it later in his career and wasting a year of control for a few worthless games at the end of this season is absurd. Fans of the Twins should be applauding this proper use of the rules as they exist now. This has become nothing more than another politically charged situation in which the “poor”, really very, very wealthy, player is being exploited by the evil management of the baseball team(not).
It seems a little absurd to say we know better than these teams on how to develop their players, I mean do we really believe Buxton is 100% fine and the ONLY reason he isn’t up is to keep him from accruing playing time? I seem to recall a thousand articles over the past few years about how the Twins should be giving him more time in the minors to figure it out. Flipping it to now say they’re holding him back is a ridiculous premise.
What I don’t like is a player in a development program deciding when they’re ready instead of the coaches– and if the team doesn’t call them up, bring in the lawyers.
I guess I’m inclined to believe a team when they say a player isn’t ready yet, or needs to be shut down, or whatever– rather than assume they’re torpedoing the development of a key player just to save a few million bucks. And as Jay points out, attendance is down for all of these teams, so maybe calling them up and exciting the base pushes close to a break-even point for the bottom line?
Playing devil’s advocate here is one thing, but trying to convince us it’s not about service time when the Twins’ GM explicitly said that Buxton’s service time factored into the decision is just perplexing. His team isn’t even trying to make these weak “development program” arguments, so why are you?
Of course it is about service time but that is very important and what is wrong with that? Is this all just about the player getting to free agency and have nothing to do with the team’s right to make decisions on how best to utilize its resources, both now and in planning for future years? The Twins, very properly, don’t see much value in Buxton wasting some of his allotted service time on the roster now, while a full season in 2022 might actually have some value.
Teams clearly parttake in service time manipulation. This is a fact. Unless you’re suggesting that historically, many players that have *seemed* ready for the bigs have suddenly figured it out coincidentally right after the deadline for an additional year of service time has passed. This is a common practice with major league ball clubs and to suggest otherwise is just a blatant misrepresentation of the truth.
I think Buxton is a poor example of this practice in general, because he does have some legitimate question marks that could be tuned up in the minors. The unfortunate fact of the matter, though, is that any team would be dumb not to take advantage of the rule.
If Vlad Jr., or Eloy, or any other prospect that arguably deserves the call ends up being the superstar we think they will, that team gets one more year of a cost-controlled super star. That’s tens of millions of savings on payroll. Calling up one of them this year will not turn into anywhere close to that amount in revenue, so there will be no break even point. It makes zero financial sense (unless you want to look at the grand picture, which is the state of the game, and even then…) for the Sox or Jays to do anything.
Which is why you will see both players around the third week of April next year.
Which is just as it should be.
“If Vlad Jr., or Eloy, or any other prospect that arguably deserves the call ends up being the superstar we think they will, that team gets one more year of a cost-controlled super star. That’s tens of millions of savings on payroll. ”
It seems to me that the folks who are crying their eyes out for these poor, poor players are overstating the supposed cost savings. An additional year of team control does not mean league minimum salary, or anything close to it.
The agents are raising the bar considerably for Arbitration-period deals.
In this, Bryce Harper’s final season of so-called “cost control”, the Nationals are paying him more than $21 million in salary and bonuses. Manny Machado is making $16 million this season, in his final control year. Nolan Arenado is making more than $17 million this season, in his second-to-last control year, and he’ll surely get a big raise again for 2019 (and deservedly so). Anthony Rendon and George Springer are each making in the neighborhood of $12 million this season with one more arb season to come, and each surely has a raise coming for that final control year. (All salary data comes from spotrac.com) These are just a handful of the numerous examples of players getting eight figure salaries in arbitration years in recent seasons.
I’m not arguing that this is a bad thing. I think it’s better for the game when young stars are being paid well for their production, as opposed to seeing massive salaries lavished upon yesterday’s stars who are now just playing out the string (*cough, cough* Pujols *cough* Cabrera *cough, cough* Harper (in the near future) *cough*). However, it’s overstating the case to say an extra year of control—even for a superstar—equals “tens of millions of savings.”
Player agents and the MLBPA (and their mouthpieces in the BBWAA) are rattling sabers over the recent state of free agency, but perhaps the marketplace has just found a new efficiency. Isn’t Fangraphs supposed to be all about efficiency? Maybe we’re seeing a long-overdue shift away from over-paying veterans in their marginally productive years (to put it kindly), and toward paying bigger dollars to young, productive talent in their arb years?
A shift like this is not driven by pure benevolence on the part of front offices—it comes from hard bargaining by the player agents on behalf of their young star clients. So those same agents (and their BBWAA mouthpieces) shouldn’t act surprised when a generation of veteran players gets passed over in the paradigm shift. Teams aren’t going to accelerate payroll growth so they can better compensate young, productive players *and* continue to dole out ill-advised deals to overpay unproductive veterans! The money is flowing from one part of the clubhouse to another.
It’s tough for those veteran players who have just reached free-agency—especially those who are a few years into their thirties—but it’s a good change for the game, and for younger players. It means a team can reserve the extra year of control, and yet the extra year of control doesn’t actually cost a young player “tens of millions.”
Yes, thank you. Worth the read.
The cost to the player is both in the less-than-market-rate salary in the extra year *and* in their reduced value as a free agent thanks to being a year older. This is in addition to the inherent risks in delaying free agency since each year makes it more likely the player suffers an injury or some similar thing that hurts or eliminates their earning power.
edit
That’s all true, but that cost to the player, overall, is still not “tens of millions”, except maybe in extreme anecdotal cases. Certainly not on the average.
A player making 15 to 20 million dollars in his last control year is losing what… maybe as much as $10 million? Most free agents aren’t getting $30+ million per year. And those other costs you mention—being a year older before free agency, and bearing the risk of a decline before getting the big FA deal—those are abstractions that are nearly impossible to quantify. We could probably quantify the difference between a guy signing a deal in his mid-20’s versus in his early 30’s, but I doubt we could parse the difference between signing a deal at age 26 rather than age 27. Especially when there is so much other noise that would enter into the equation.
Actually the articles almost always say that he needs more MLB at bats.
He needs AB’s wherever he can find them, like Fort Myers in the spring, but not in the majors this September. Buxton has shown that hitting is a real problem with him and the farther out the Twins can maintain control the better for both. If he never hits he isn’t going to get much in free agency so what’s the rush. The fact that he carries a tough burden, #2 overall pick in the draft, and anointed by many as the next coming of Willie, has put a target on his back and makes it difficult for the Twins to hide him and treat him as they would any other player with his poor offensive record.
But with the minor league seasons ending, where else can he play right now? As you said, he needs at-bats (technically plate appearances) wherever he can find them, and Minnesota is the only place he can find them right now.
I am just trying to make the point that the commenters and articles overwhelmingly have always said he needs MLB ABs and not AAA ABs which I disagree with – several articles have been written that say exactly that. He needs to fix his swing or just play and do what he does well.
“I mean do we really believe Buxton is 100% fine and the ONLY reason he isn’t up is to keep him from accruing playing time?”
Twins: “hey, you’re coming off a wrist injury. Go play! But then stop playing after you play well and the minor league season ends.”
Either they knowingly asked him to play hurt, then chose to shut him down, or they and he knew he wasn’t hurt and they’re manipulating his time. Either way, you’re wrong – we can say we know better than the Twins in that we see through their rouse.
Well, obviously, playing AAA baseball when you’ve dinged your wrist and you have migraine problems and boo-boos on inconsequential bits and pieces is a medically recommended way to accelerate the healing process. Whereas playing in the MLB in September will do the reverse.
I’m tolerably certain that this is the advice proffered by medical professionals to the Twins FO in pursuance of those first three,, and more important, reasons they gave.
Bad teams holding down quality MLB-ready prospects looks really bad for the sport, especially when the fanbase wants to see young talent as at least some hope. It also reinforces the flaws in the CBA that incentivize this approach, and tanking as well. Buxton, given his struggles/injuries, might not be the best example of this, but the sport needs the excitement that sticking a journeyman replacement value player out there doesn’t generate. It’s a reinforcement to the fans that business takes precedence over not just winning, but also giving them a product they should want to come out to the park for.
The MLBPA absolutely has to win significantly higher pre-arb salaries in the next CBA. The current minimum of ~$500k is ridiculous – they generate so much surplus value that the marginal cost to teams of tripling or even quintupling that would be minor, and the benefits would be enormous for early-career players. Lowering the amount of time before free agency is gonna be fought tooth and nail by owners, so higher pre-arb and arb salaries are the most realistic way of slightly improving this broken system.
Higher pre-arb salaries likely would push teams to pursue older free agents more than they did last offseason, as the young players wouldn’t be the same cheap-alternative they are now.
However, these young guys may stay in the minors longer, depending on the teams’ total salary, as it’d be more expensive to call up guys.
I think this is part of the goal for the union. Their recent concessions on issues like capped draft spending, international spending caps, etc. have made building teams through accumulation of sub-MLB talent more cost-efficient than ever, especially since those cheaply-acquired players then come to MLB and make much less than market value for most of their useful playing days. Anything to encourage the process of team-building via union members is in the interest of the union and probably in the interest of baseball unless you like watching a good third or more of the league actively avoiding adding the best major league talent available to them.
“I think part of our jobs is we’re supposed to be responsible to factoring service time into every decision we make,”
Jesus, I still can’t believe he actually said that on the record. Are we finally at the point where MLB front offices don’t even feel compelled to lie regarding service time manipulation?
I think it’s nice when they don’t completely insult the intelligence of the fanbase.
I am glad to see some attention being drawn to this. On one hand, you have a player hitting below .200 with some nagging injuries and I think it can be as simple as that, but its 40 man rosters! I think they made a mistake pulling the plug on his season. If getting healthy and raking was not enough to earn a call-up, then what was he doing? Nice work Byron… just kidding!
I’m in the opposite camp. I’m a Padres fan and wasn’t happy they brought up Urias while El Paso is in the midst of a playoff run. How must it feel to be the affiliate owner or fan and your best player is taken away right before the playoffs? They could have waited an extra couple of weeks to bring him up. Let him fight for the championship that he’s been playing for all year, then promote him.
I know I’m probably in the minority here. I am glad he’s up, just wish Preller would have waited
I’m willing to bet that if you asked Urias which he would have preferred he would have said the MLB call-up.
We’ll find out how the Padres are rewarded for NOT manipulating his service time one offseason before we find out how the ChiSox are hurt for manipulating Eloy’s.
I think you can make a pretty solid argument that the Twins are among the 2-3 worst teams in the league in player development. The number of players that have left and had success in other orgs is pretty damning evidence, and specific to Buxton, Eno’s articles (among others) suggest they’ve done a fair amount to toy with his swing and influence his mechanics to his detriment at the worst possible times in his development.
That said, I don’t think its fair to characterize this decision as purely service-time related. Buxton has had several chances now with the big club and not performed, and its fair for the org to give the ABs to other guys, who don’t have Buxton’s profile. Cave has looked like a decent big league piece over the last month, and he’s certainly not playing with Buxton around. So if you’re going to be giving other guys ABs anyway, it doesn’t make sense to run up Buxton’s service clock on the bench.
And I think that’s a fair place to come out on this — Is service time a consideration? Yes. Is it the top consideration? Nope, and maybe not even top 3 reasons.
Cave wouldn’t have to go the bench for Buxton. At worst, he would go to the corners, where he might be better off anyway. (He’s played some in the corners anyway, in favor of Kepler in CF.)
With Rosario out, the Twins have been starting Grossman or Field every day, and neither one is likely on the roster next spring.
And Buxton wouldn’t have needed to start every day either. He could even have taken some days at DH.
The MLBPA should push to get 31 days = 1 year of service time.
That way, a team has to wait through almost the entire season if they really want to game the system. Otherwise, they just call the player up when he is ready. There is no advantage to waiting until May or June.
But it also allows a team to call up guys on September 1st without burning a year.
It would also help career minor leaguers who get a month here or there.
The players would have to give something up but this isn’t a huge loss for the owners, so it shouldn’t be big.
I would love to see an overhaul to the six years of control. Maybe the players get arbitration at year 5 (instead of 4 now) but get free agency at the end of year 5 instead of 6.
Or arbitration starts at year 2 instead of 3 but no free agency until after year 7.
Could be much simpler than that — service time doesn’t trigger until you’re on the 25-man roster. Then September would be free for everyone. And once a player is up and produces, its much harder for teams to justify keeping them down.
Also, I wouldn’t mind seeing the Rule-5 draft expanded with maybe another mid-season version. I can think of a dozen guys off-hand that deserve MLB at bats, but are blocked and have been for multiple seasons.
I’d really rather not see AAAA players earning arbitration level salaries just from getting a month or two of MLB service time for three years.
Why not? Just how much do you think they’d earn there based on being little more than a semi-productive backup for three years?
Vlad Jr is not on the Blue Jays 40-man roster:
http://m.bluejays.mlb.com/tor/roster/40-man/
Of course he isn’t, since he’s just 19! But to bring him up, they would need to drop someone from the 40-man roster. I can think of no good reason why they Jays should do that before they absolutely have to.
Eloy actually IS on the 40-man, BTW, so I cannot easily justify the WSX case.
A fine piece of work, Jay.
To play Devil’s Advocate for a moment–if we remove the name “Buxton” from the player this is happening to, then I don’t know that anyone really pays attention to this lack of promotion. Without the name, the narrative becomes, “Young, defensively-gifted, strike-out-prone, Twins OF is shut down for the year after missing much of it with numerous maladies and so-so production at AAA.”
I’m not discrediting the WAR that Buxton has accumulated via his defensive prowess, but he is a lousy hitter at the highest level so far, and a few September HR each year against the minor-league pitching call-ups of KC, Detroit, and the White Sox haven’t proven otherwise, to my eyes. If Cave were playing terribly and Buxton had been mashing for months at AAA, then this would seem odd to this Twins fan, but that isn’t the case, and the coaches who know Buxton best may not want to see him push himself for three weeks at the game’s highest level, aggravate his injuries, struggle mightily, and then leave Buxton wondering if he really doesn’t belong. A fresh start in the spring just might be best for this perplexing player.
We know that service time is manipulated, but this doesn’t seem like the most egregious case, and Levine’s forthrightness is somewhat refreshing to me.
If you remove the name Byron Buxton, you’re still left with the name Krusty the Clown.
Buxton’s biggest problem is that he has made no progress on hitting righties, even in his “breakout.” He has improved greatly against lefties, but that makes him a platoon guy at best.
He’s Ender Inciarte but from the other side.
Yeah, so get him some MLB reps!
I think Buxton is a terrible case study for this. The guy has been terrible all year and I don’t really buy that sending him back to get eaten alive by major league pitchers again is in his best interests. Let him get healthy and then send him to the Dominican League or something to try to FINALLY get locked into one swing for more than a month. Not to mention that the Twins have an interest in giving Jake Cave some playing time to find out if he’s anything more than a bench bat long term.
The case for bringing him up is tenuous at best, and any whining out of his camp smacks of entitlement when you consider his performance.
Fans are not “conditioned” to side with owners over players. Fans cheer for their team, not individual players. I realize your disdain for your readers leads you to be confused about their motives, so I’ll help clear it up for you.
When Acuna signs with the Yankees for $400M, how many Braves fans are going run out and buy an Acuna pinstriped jersey and become Yankees fans? None who aren’t friends/family of Ronald. They are all going to be thankful Acuna was around to help their team win for an extra season before they couldn’t afford him.
Yes, I do enjoy that the author presumes that any acceptance or defense of the team/ownership is based upon ‘conditioning’, which is super fashionable in sports writing today in spite (or perhaps because) of its foundation in the assumption that fans are all dumb. Any argument that is predicated on the notion that dissent comes from ‘The Sheeple” can usually be disregarded as garbage.
I don’t see why teams should be expected to not respond rationally to the incentives put before them. If players want it changed, bargain for that change. And as I mentioned above, I don’t think the union has a leg to stand on with Buxton anyway.
I root for the team, not the ownership. I like the players on the team and would prefer that I’m not rooting for guys who are seriously underpaid. I want my team to try to win every day and be willing to spend the money it costs to do that.
I remember a similar situation coming up with the Brewers and JJ Hardy roughly a decade ago after a long stretch of poor play compelled the Brewers to send him down to AAA, and IIRC, it wound up being a long enough demotion to cost him a year of service time. That decision probably wound up paying off in spades for Milwaukee – Hardy was traded for Carlos Gomez (which probably needed Hardy’s extra year of service time to make the trade work out!) after this all happened, and after playing by far the best years of his career for MIL, Gomez was then traded for a king’s ransom of players, including Josh Hader, in 2015.
I think the issue of blatant service time manipulation definitely deserves some greater attention come the next round of CBA negotiations (and I believe Levine’s comments will be used as leverage thereforth), but one way players can avoid what is happening to Buxton now and what happened to Hardy a decade ago is to, you know, not play yourself into the late season demotion situation in the first place.
To me, the solution to health-related questions is rather simple in nature but expensive and difficult to achieve in execution; you need to create an independent health evaluation arbitration department that evaluates all players outside of both team and league opinion.
Obviously teams would balk at this because suddenly you’re putting the potential future of your assets in control of someone other than your own team, which is why the process would need to be extremely thorough and transparent, capable of answering all possible questions. Teams need to understand that in this day and age, player health is a science and the world has the tools available to do a complete job of it, and given the finances and value something like this would provide to MLB and players as a whole, teams would understand that the priority of the independent department both has their best interests at heart and can do a better job than they themselves can.
I believe this is a solution AND a step in towards how the future of MLB and professional sports in general – process, control, group collaboration.
Four factors to consider.
1. What helps Byron Buxton in 2018?
2. What helps the Minnesota Twins in 2018?
3. What helps Byron Buxton in 2019?
4. What helps the Minnesota Twins in 2019?
Calling up Buxton now will not help the success of the Twins in either 2018 or 2019. Regardless of how well he plays this fall, the Twins will have one of the worst records in the league this year and any success he has will not necessarily translate to success next year, based on his track record of September success and April awfulness. He seems to need extended periods to lock in his eye and swing, which he’ll have to do next spring,regardless of how he performs in September. Therefore, success now will not help Buxton or the Twins in 2019, either. On the other hand, there is a risk from calling him up now, in that he could get injured (or perform poorly), which could harm him and the team next year. Partially omitted from Jay’s article is the long list of injuries Buxton has had, going back several years.
The most tangible benefit to calling Buxton up in September 2018 is to enable him to achieve free agency a year earlier. Yes, that could help him financially, but it doesn’t improve his or the team’s performance.
As to his playing in AAA in August, he had several scheduled days off and other days when he was just DH. The Twins were clearly trying to let him work his way back from injury. He had a tremendous BABIP and an extremely low BB%. It is conceivable that the Twins looked at film and more than his slash rate to determine if he was ready to succeed in the majors and decided they didn’t see enough to risk injury or poor health.
To Thad Levine:
Thanks for being honest, but you may have been more successful, while still being truthful, by saying something like, “Of course we’re aware of the effect on service time, but. . .”
“diverting attention away from the games themselves and becoming it’s own story”
There’s no evidence for this. On a non-contending club, there’s a lack of stories to write at this time of year, and the great majority of ticket buyers are indifferent anyway.
Also: its.
There’s certain activity that you might say is necessary for something to “become a story”. For instance, someone writing about it.
I am absolutely baffled about how many times I can read the same article on this site without it ever being mentioned why the rules of service time exist in the first place.
I think you need to look this at the business side of things. We all want baseball to stay competetive, and this is one way small teams can do that. Keep their young, possible franchise players, for as along as possible. Because if Bucton turns in a 3-6 WAR player, we all know what’ s going to happen, the big payroll teams will swoop in and buy him. Im all for the argument to field your best possible team, IF that will lead to something (e.g.: playoff spot). I dont understand how this isn’t different from the twins not going all in on say Manny Machado and trade for him. That’s also a way to field the best possible team. But if they would’ ve done that, we would’ve BURNED this GM, saying what is he playing for and why morgage their future for now with nothing at stake. Isn’t playing Buxton now also mortaging their future for a lost season?
I suspect that if Buxton’s agents approached the Twins about signing a five-year contract at his current value, he’d be playing center field for them tomorrow. Take from that what you will.
Players should give up more than they already do (6-7 years of team control) or what, they are selfish and deserve to be dicked around on service time?
Buxton certainly seems like a victim of service time manipulation, but I would leave out Alonso for several reasons: Until last week he was hitting .220 since being promoted to AAA. As for defense he was a disaster in both AA and AAA this season. As of right now, the Mets are transitioning a solid veteran (Jay Bruce) to first base as he has been squeezed out of the OF and the versatility will increase his trade value this off season.
This attempt at condemning ownership fails, and is basically misdirected.
This situation was negotiated by the Players’ Union, on behalf of entrenched players who did not want their places taken by young, upcoming stars. This protected overpaid, older players, while also giving ownership the opportunity to save money, albeit potentially at the cost of a small number of wins.
This “thought process” is not limited to baseball, of course. Rookies in the three major sports (sorry, hockey) are given shorter ends of a pretty fat stick, leaving Maurice Clarrett, for example, to lose to the union that never had any intention of protecting him; basketball players go to Europe for paid training because that union wants to protect older, and better-paid, players.
Byron Buxton’s main complaint, like Kris Bryant’s, lies with his older teammates and with more-tenured players, and with relatively recent retirees. The owners are using a system negotiated by the players.
I find it ironic that the NBA and MLB tankers both provide intentionally inferior products for exactly opposite reasons. NBA teams play young players since they’re already on their roster and their service time is ticking while aiming at a top draft pick and a likely superstar, MLB teams not playing young players to prevent their service time from starting, but specific MLB draft position is such a crapshoot bad teams would likely be ok with winning some of it didn’t cost them millions of dollars (which it does since you’re gaining a year of control which is guaranteed to be below market rate or you’d cut the player.
I don’t think I’ve figured out the silver bullet but there seems like there should be some way to meet in the middle of these problems and make both leagues more competitive and fun to watch
An alternative course a player could take would be to sign a long term extension or partial term extension. Because, we are all familiar with the tendency for players who are being “paid” to get playing time regardless of their performance.
The overall service time manipulations and rules in MLB are so geared towards teams it is ridiculous, especially compared to other major pro sports. The likes of Vlad can play 4 years at All-Star level before getting 1 million dollars in a year. Meanwhile, veterans get 9M$/WAR. MLBPA executives (and agents) can complain all they want with “safety-first” contracts such as signed by Carlos Martinez and the likes, but those good young players need tremendous confidence in their ability to stay good and healthy to refuse those earlier contracts that buy their best FA years at a discount. Young stars need better compensation for the value they provide.