Byron Buxton Is Playing Excellent Baseball
Regardless of whether you believe that they’re good, the Twins are presently sitting in a would-be playoff position. In a crowded field for the American League’s second wild card, the Twins are alone in front, even after having sold off a closer and re-gifted a starter. That the Twins sold pieces is as good an indication as any that they didn’t expect to be here, but here they are, a team with a chance. Most of the AL teams count as teams with a chance, but who are the Twins to deny themselves an opportunity?
There’s no such thing as an organizational plan that revolves around three players, and yet there’s nothing more valuable than a young and cost-controlled star. For that reason, so much of the Twins’ greater outlook seems to depend on the development of Miguel Sano, Jose Berrios, and Byron Buxton. Last year’s Twins lost 103 games, with those three players combining for 2.6 WAR. This year’s Twins are vying for the one-game playoff, with those same three players combining already for 6.5 WAR. Very obviously, there’s been more that’s gone on. But the core has been more promising than not, with Buxton now making another attempt to emerge.
I don’t need to tell you about Buxton’s prospect pedigree. I don’t need to remind you that we’ve been teased by Buxton before. Great players have great whole seasons; talented players have great whole months. Buxton’s more of the latter than the former, but of late, he has shown something new. Buxton is teasing again, in a different way.
This season began with Buxton performing worse than perhaps anyone else in the majors. That was disappointing for many reasons, chief among them that Buxton finished 2016 so well. It seemed like Buxton might’ve been lining himself up for a breakout with a big September, but upon closer inspection, one notices that the 165 wRC+ was paired with a 34% strikeout rate. Good Buxton was still low-contact Buxton, and low-contact Buxton probably isn’t strong enough to be productive.
When August Fagerstrom wrote about late-summer Buxton, he highlighted the aggressive leg kick that preceded the swing. That’s something Buxton had toyed around with. For various times, Buxton had had a leg kick, and he’d stood in there quieter. September Buxton lifted his leg. One was tempted to connect the dots. With players like this, one of our biases is that we’re forever looking for reasons to believe.
I’m subject to the same bias. I’m looking for a reason, myself. But, see, now Buxton has changed course. Back in May, Travis wrote about Buxton trying to slow things down. And then Buxton decided to abandon the leg kick entirely. Here’s a post from Jake Depue, and here’s a post from Rhett Bollinger. Buxton wanted to make more contact. His coaches wanted to see him give himself more time. As I’m sure you’ve read several times before, it can be difficult to make these swing adjustments during the season on the fly, but Buxton up and made the effort. Said effort is being rewarded.
Here’s a clip of Buxton from early in April:
Here is Buxton from Monday:
And again, later:
The difference is pronounced. This isn’t one of those subtle mechanical things that only an expert could identify. Your own mother or father or neighbor or friend could see that the hitter is trying to do something different in those clips. In all cases, Buxton has been trying to hit the ball and hit it hard, but Buxton more recently has simplified. Every frustrating young player just wants to find a tactic that works.
One benefit of mechanical simplification can be adding a split-second or two to make a decision. There’s some evidence to suggest that the recent version of Buxton has done a better job of swinging at strikes instead of balls:
This plot, meanwhile, is the even more promising one. Buxton’s problem all along has been making consistent contact. He’s starting to make more contact:
Whether it’ll hold, I can’t say. That’s always the second issue. The first issue is making a helpful tweak; then you have to make it permanent. There’s a long, long way to go before we can safely conclude that Byron Buxton has gotten a lot better at getting the bat on the ball. Yet, he hasn’t previously shown this. And it’s not as if he’s up there taking half-swings, either. Buxton isn’t intentionally sacrificing a bunch of swing speed for balls in play. His hard-hit rate is fine. He’s taking more of an all-fields approach. Buxton doesn’t have Aaron Judge’s raw power, but he doesn’t need it. He needs, simply, to not strike out in a third of his chances.
It’s not too hard to understand why Buxton’s so very exciting. Why he doesn’t need to hit all that much in order to be an All-Star. The other day, he recorded the fastest inside-the-park home run that Statcast has seen, breaking his own record. Only Billy Hamilton has put up a higher average sprint speed. Since Buxton broke into the majors the first time, he’s ranked seventh overall in baserunning runs per 600 plate appearances. Buxton has always been able to move, and it makes him all the more dangerous.
More dangerous on the bases, and more dangerous in the field. Again, since breaking in, Buxton has been the third-best defensive center fielder by DRS, and the 12th-best defensive center fielder by UZR. I believe more in the former. Messing around with Statcast catch probabilities, I find that Buxton was a good fly-catcher a season ago. This season, no one has been better. Buxton this year has the league’s highest difference between actual catches and expected catches, based on league-average figures. Both DRS and UZR agree Buxton’s been better than ever. Which explains the following quote, from Brian Dozier:
“People say, ‘Numbers don’t lie,’ ” Dozier said. “Numbers lie more than anything in the game. It’s biggest lie in all of sports, the numbers. Because that guy has changed the game for our pitching staff more than anybody. And I’m not talking about the running-up-against-the-wall catches; I’m talking about even little bloopers in the gaps, plays that people don’t really see.
“I don’t care if he hits .180; that guy changes the game more than anybody I’ve seen in this game over my six years, defensively.”
Dozier is correct to note that Buxton can be a helpful everyday player even when his offense is down. He wouldn’t be the first light-hitting center fielder to slot in there on a regular basis. And that’s precisely why these recent offensive developments are so encouraging. Suddenly, Byron Buxton is showing the ability to make more consistent contact. Perhaps he could hit closer to .280 than .180. Perhaps not, but this is a new kind of tease. A tease and a breakout look the same at the beginning.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.


Over the last calendar year he has hit exactly league average. If he at least maintains that level of production at the plate, he becomes a 4+WAR player with the chance he will eventually tap into that huge upside that came with his pedigree.
I’m rooting big time for him. The game needs more raw athletes like him.
I hope Moncada learns to put the bat on the ball more frequently too. Turning singles to doubles. Doubles to triples. Triples to – the most exciting play in baseball – inside-the-park HR’s.
I don’t think the game needs more raw athletes. I think it needs more quality baseball players and fewer raw athletes. To each his own though. I really like watching guys like Chase Utley play. I don’t like watching dudes swinging out of their ass and throwing balls all over the field very much (imagine peak Puig). If all I did was watch highlights, and browse Statcast rates then I would have a different opinion.
In regards to offense: I respectfully disagree. I think the game needs more raw athletes that are dripping with tools – that carry over to defense too – to put the ball in play. What the game needs less of is – watching the best athlete on the team take a slow stroll back to the dugout.
Not every player is built for this day and age of the long ball. When some are getting under the ball often – but only resulting in weak fly balls and IFFB, it seems counter productive. A lot of these type of players could benefit from more of an 80’s style of play. Not to the extreme of “slash and dash” but more of a level swing line drive approach.
Maybe i’m just selfish and prefer more action than todays game provides?
I was expecting there to be a bunch of commenters voicing their disagreement.
Buxton since the all-star break feels like the Buxton that was sold to Twins fans as the future of the franchise, and I, for one, couldn’t be happier. He’s a joy to watch on defense even when he wasn’t hitting, and it feels like seeing something special now that he is.
A lot of people are going to point to last September as a reason to dismiss what he’s doing now, but as you said, he’s making a lot more contact while last Sept he was still striking out 30%+ of the time during his hot streak.
The clip from earlier this year is also so demonstrative of how his season started – look at the count, 0-2. In April/May the guy would walk to the plate and you could just see the three pitch massacre coming. It may be the mechanics, or it may just be experience, but it sure looks like he has more control of his ABs than he had previously.
I’m not buying in yet.he has had stretches of excellence before and then regressed. His second half so far is very good but for the season his wRC+ is still a very bad 80.
Now with his talent he could break out at any moment but I also think he has a complicated swing that he has tinkered with a lot. That is similar to jason heyward who also has tinkered a lot with his swing. That is a risk because in the next slump might tinker with his swing again. Now there have been mlb hitters making successful swing changes that sticked (bautista, Donaldson) but buxton has not one adjustment but several and often back and forth. That is not good for muscle memory and confidence. The leg kick also was supposed to be the big thing for him and then he struggled and switched back.
Again maybe this is the time it sticks but all the tinkering he made I think is an extra risk going forward, every coach tells him something different and when he struggles again he might again start to question his whole mechanical process.
I hope he proves me wrong and the talent is there but I won’t buy in unless he has a whole consitent good season, two good months won’t sell me on him yet.
See, I would cite his being rushed to the majors and through several iterations of swing changes as a reason to give him some benefit of a doubt for his early struggles. Yeah, eventually this becomes a pattern and you start to wonder if constant mechanical changes are cover for just not being very good, but I don’t think we’ve hit that point yet.
Also, I love that he has Molitor there, talk about the prototype of the type of player you’d want to get out of Buxton. Not really a numbers driven article, but this was an interesting read: http://m.startribune.com/byron-buxton-copying-what-his-manager-did-at-the-plate-and-patience-is-working/440667023/
I don’t know if it’s that it’s a cover for him “not being very good”, I think the bigger issue (and the one Dominikk85 mentioned) is that he’s had trouble repeating his swing before. So it’s not clear if he’ll have the muscle memory to keep it going. He’s struggled in the past, but I don’t know that the 80 wRC+ matters so much if it wasn’t for the fact that he’s been all over the place with his swing.
That’s very similar to what’s been said about Jason Heyward, who has simultaneously had an outstanding career, and been somewhat of a disappointment.
Numbers don’t lie, you just have to understand what they’re saying!
You can also use numbers to tell whatever story you want.
“For that reason, so much of the Twins’ greater outlook seems to depend on the development of Miguel Sano, Jose Berrios, and Byron Buxton.”
And Max Kepler! Don’t forget Max Kepler! Ahhh…never mind.
Maybe just maybe he can develop into a JBJ with a bit more speed.
I’m hoping for a prime B.J Upton. Although, I think Buxton has more upside, mainly coming from his defense. B.J was a hell of an athlete himself, but didn’t have the same instincts as Buxton does. They have a lot of similarities though, including the way they are built.
Such a great comp. They are physically similar. Same type of player. BJ/Melvin was a beast during his inexplicably short prime.
The problem with the comp is that Upton peaked early – 22 was Upton’s peak. What could Upton have become? Upton is about as unique a player as has ever played the game when you look at the career arc. There was a time when he was looking like a real superstar/ HOF’er
Yup.
The thing about Prime BJ Upton is that he always “had more upside” than the awesome stuff he was doing.
Buxton has a lot more than “a bit more speed” than JBJ. He’s legitimately two or three grades faster — he’s amassed as much BSR this year as JBJ has in his career.
Give that kid a .340 OBP, and he’s a 6 win player.
These guys with blazing speed need to adapt to more of a level swing, instead of this craze of getting under the ball, most of the time resulting in weak fly balls to the warning track, or worse, IFFB (guys with marginal power).
Let em’ know doubles and triples help that slugging percentage too.
You are right on with that comment. I would take it even a bit further and talk about Carl Crawford. He used his speed to create a contact-heavy approach early on, but he grew into power as the game (and he) slowed down and he got physically stronger. Buxton should just try to put the bat on the ball and worry about everything else once he learns to hit MLB pitching.
In his first 15 games he was 4-49 – .082/.135/.122 line
Since then, he’s hitting .268/.333/.412 w/26% k rate
This is all good, and he is making progress. I would note that while his K rate has dropped from 33.3% to 24.4% which is great, his BB rate has declined from 10.5 to 5.8% I think this is a decent trade off, but of course ideally his BB rate would be 8-10% with a K Rate below 25%, or 6/20. Maybe he will continue to improve a la Andrew McCutcheon and reach those levels.
He is putting more balls in play? Contact% up = K% & BB% down?
I don’t think Cutch ever had the plate discipline and swing and miss issues that Buxton has shown, ever. He was starting from a much stronger foundation.
When checking up on Miggy Cabrera’s statcast numbers I came across this Buxton catch. Maybe not a great initial read but what a recovery:
https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/videos?video_id=1714273283
Love the reactions by Gibson (amazed relief), Cabrera (annoyed disbelief) and Buxton (I knew it all along).
I love to see a player, Dozier here, sticking up for a teammate.
I’ve probably been the biggest Buxton skeptic here, and I’m ready to concede that he may be adapting. His strikeout rate has been 28, 22, 24 in the past 3 months, and while the walks are also falling, it has seemed to help him finally tap into some of the power. I hope he continues to adjust and improve. I’m not a believer yet, but I’m much more hopeful than I was a few months ago.
Buxton didn’t really make this change in-season. He made it on a prolonged DL stint complete with a rehab stint. I guess that is in-season, but it is not like he didn’t take time off to get things straight.
As far as going forward, he immediately looked better upon activation from the DL, but he has looked a bit more like bad Buxton the past few games. Let’s hope that he is mentally strong enough to straighten it out on the fly. I disagree that this about leg kicks and hand positions… although that is the easy thing to point at. Early in the season, I was the guy saying that he needed to simplify and rebuild which a lot of commenters didn’t want to hear. I also said he needed some time off. I think simplifying his swing helped a little bit, but more importantly he just got a chance to step away and get his head clear. The game just goes way too fast for him when he struggles and he has been slowing it down a bit lately. Early in the season, he was just indiscriminately swinging and taking pitches. He is looking at the ball now, which is helping a lot. The swing is still really inconsistent and I don’t think he has much of a plan at the plate, but he is talented enough that all he has to do is not strike out 40% of the time, which he has demonstrated a few times now. I would love to see Buxton get his swing straight, but it hasn’t happened yet. There is another potential level that he could reach with a consistent swing and approach, but he very well may never get there.