Can Freddie Freeman Re-Open the 3,000 Hit Club?

Freddie Freeman
Gary A. Vasquez-USA TODAY Sports

Two years ago, I wrote about the imminent demise of the 3,000 Hit Club after Miguel Cabrera became a member. Simply put, it was a question of math. The worse the environment is for hitting for batting average, the fewer players there will be who will put up lofty career hit totals. While it would be easy to think there are simply more lousy hitters these days, as league batting average has dropped in recent decades, the spread in individual batting averages has not increased; great players see lower batting averages when league batting averages decline. But while 2023’s new rules didn’t herald a reversal of the trend, one late entrant in the race for 3,000 hits has continued to excel: Freddie Freeman.

What makes the nadir of the 3,000 Hit Club so jarring to a baseball fan is the newness of this phenomenon. The explosion of offense in the 1990s wasn’t just homers, but batting average as well. Even going back 10 years, there were always a lot of players with career hit totals somewhere north of 2,000.

In 2023, that number is seven, and that’s only because there were four new members this year: Freeman, Jose Altuve, Elvis Andrus, and Andrew McCutchen. (I’m going to go out on a limb and predict that Evan Longoria won’t get 72 hits over the next two weeks.) Contrast that with 2004, which featured 27 active players with 2,000 career hits.

That brings us back to Freeman. While he was always good at hitting for average throughout his 20s, his hallmark was his year-to-year consistency rather than amassing batting titles. Batting average tends to peak rather early, and Freeman wasn’t at the top of the leaderboards in either hits or batting average over the first decade of his career.

Batting Average Leaders, 2010s
Name AVG H
Miguel Cabrera .317 1595
Jose Altuve .315 1568
Adrián Beltré .307 1466
Joey Votto .306 1532
Mike Trout .305 1324
Charlie Blackmon .304 1244
Buster Posey .302 1378
DJ LeMahieu .302 1223
Christian Yelich .301 1067
Mookie Betts .301 965
Daniel Murphy .301 1367
Robinson Canó .300 1695
José Martínez .298 344
Michael Brantley .296 1339
Whit Merrifield .296 655
Dustin Pedroia .296 1225
Vladimir Guerrero .295 341
Michael Young .295 713
Nolan Arenado .295 1160
Joe Mauer .294 1279
J.D. Martinez .294 1168
Ryan Braun .294 1410
Corey Seager .294 545
Yuli Gurriel .293 516
Freddie Freeman .293 1451
Troy Tulowitzki .293 931
José Abreu .293 1038
Marco Scutaro .293 628
Paul Goldschmidt .292 1337
David Ortiz .292 1014

As noted above, most players see big batting average dips when they cross 30. Even looking just at players who managed 3,000 hits, their batting averages in their 30s were about 20 points lower than their 20s. Freeman didn’t get the memo, however; the three best batting averages of his career have all come within the last four seasons, despite league batting average bottoming out. This year, he’s at .335, arguably a more impressive number than his .341 in the shortened 2020 season.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

To see how much progress Freeman has made, I went back and called up his final projected hits in ZiPS before each season of his career:

ZiPS Career Projection – Freddie Freeman
Year Hits
2010 1850
2011 2116
2012 2299
2013 2238
2014 2434
2015 2532
2016 2238
2017 2407
2018 2362
2019 2506
2020 2581
2021 2583
2022 2669
2023 2827
Now 2991

ZiPS liked Freeman fairly quickly, but his career hit projection stayed relatively stable after a few years, hovering somewhere in the 2,400–2,500 range. The last few years have changed that. His runway has become longer and longer, with the risk increasingly coming from a serious injury rather than decline. Now, he will decline, but like flying a hang glider, the higher you start, the longer before you hit the ground.

Here’s the updated career projection for Freeman through Sunday’s games:

ZiPS Career Projection – Freddie Freeman
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB OPS+ DR WAR
2024 .301 .385 .512 574 110 173 39 2 26 95 73 106 13 142 0 4.7
2025 .290 .375 .484 531 97 154 35 1 22 83 67 101 10 132 0 3.5
2026 .281 .366 .461 484 84 136 31 1 18 71 60 95 8 124 0 2.6
2027 .272 .358 .442 430 72 117 26 1 15 60 53 88 7 117 -1 1.8
2028 .261 .345 .412 376 59 98 22 1 11 49 45 81 5 106 -1 0.9
2029 .252 .337 .399 321 48 81 18 1 9 39 37 73 4 100 -2 0.5
2030 .247 .332 .382 267 39 66 15 0 7 31 31 62 3 94 -2 0.2
2031 .242 .325 .363 215 30 52 11 0 5 24 24 50 2 88 -2 -0.1

This isn’t a particularly bullish outlook, with ZiPS projecting a fairly steady decline (as you should at these ages). But it’s still enough to net him 877 hits, which, with the 16 more projected in 2023, brings Freeman to 2,991. ZiPS actually has a milestone algorithm I wrote some years ago that reduces playing time less as a player nears a significant milestone, so the projection system now has Freeman more likely to get to 3,000 than to fall short, at 53%. With his projected homer total nearing 450 and his WAR likely to top 70, Freeman is increasingly becoming a good bet for Cooperstown.

Not many active players are likely to join Freeman at 3,000 hits, with ZiPS projecting, on average, only 1.6 players other than him reaching the mark. Here are the 23 active players with at least a 0.5% projected chance:

ZiPS Career Projection – Hit Milestones
Player 2000 2500 3000
Freddie Freeman 100% 88% 53%
Jose Altuve 100% 89% 38%
Ronald Acuña Jr. 91% 54% 22%
Juan Soto 81% 43% 11%
Bo Bichette 68% 38% 9%
Wander Franco 63% 34% 9%
Julio Rodriguez 60% 31% 8%
Luis Arraez 49% 18% 8%
Vladimir Guerrero Jr. 77% 37% 7%
Michael Harris II 62% 34% 7%
Corbin Carroll 55% 24% 7%
Fernando Tatis Jr. 62% 27% 7%
Mookie Betts 92% 31% 5%
Bobby Witt Jr. 56% 23% 3%
Manny Machado 99% 51% 3%
Xander Bogaerts 94% 25% 3%
Francisco Lindor 82% 17% 3%
Gunnar Henderson 52% 25% 2%
Mike Trout 95% 57% 2%
Nolan Arenado 98% 32% 2%
Trea Turner 72% 12% 2%
Paul Goldschmidt 100% 26% 1%
José Ramírez 84% 19% 1%

ZiPS still thinks that Altuve is going to run out of calendar, but his outlook has improved somewhat since 2021. The two biggest gainers this year, meanwhile, have been Acuña Jr. and Bichette.

While it’s still too soon to be writing any speeches or preparing any celebrations, Cabrera might want to consider leaving the lights on at the 3,000 Hit Club for Freeman.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

90 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
synco
2 years ago

Cool stuff. Can ZiPS output ages as well? Would be very helpful in general when reading projection charts.

KinanikMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  synco

I’ve run several machine learning algorithms and I can project that age increases by one each year.*

*I know what you mean, though, it would be helpful and I’m sure I’ve seen the projections with age before.

Jason BMember since 2017
2 years ago
Reply to  Kinanik

I’ve run several machine learning algorithms and I can project that age increases by one each year.”

I have backtested this through a couple of other channels. Math checks out, guys

Uncle SpikeMember since 2020
2 years ago

I’m not so sure there’s a 63% chance Wander gets to 2,000.

J. Paquin
2 years ago
Reply to  Uncle Spike

Do projection systems incorporate “permanent ban” risk? I guess not!

Pepper Martin
2 years ago
Reply to  Uncle Spike

FanGraphs did its trade value countdown this summer and put Franco at number 2 overall. Less than a month later, baseballtradevalues.com had Franco’s contract as the single most underwater contract in baseball, at -$163 million.

68FCMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Pepper Martin

In the case of a permanent ban, I would assume the contract would get voided or forfeited. Teams don’t pay players while they are suspended.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  68FC

The worst-case scenario from a team perspective would be if MLB finds there is enough to give him a ban of something like 1.5-2 years. That would indicate some serious misconduct. It would mean you’re stuck having a known abuser on the roster and everything that entails or cutting him and paying him not to play. If he’s permanently banned (something for which there is little precedent so far under the policy) then you wouldn’t have to pay him a cent.

PC1970Member since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Sort of like the Trevor Bauer situation, but, with 7-8 years left instead of 1.

68FCMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I hadn’t considered that outcome, but that is essentially what happened with Bauer. But instead of having to pay out 1 year of the contract like the Dodgers did, the Rays would be on the hook for 8 or 9 years.

I wonder if there is language in the contract (or most player contracts) that voids them in the case of a criminal conviction, since that seems to be a possibility in Franco’s case.

mikejuntMember
2 years ago
Reply to  68FC

The case study here isn’t Bauer, it’s the currently in prison for conduct with an underage fan Felipe Vasquez, and he’s on the restricted list and not getting paid – probably forever.

mikejuntMember
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I don’t think its that unprecedented. If Felipe Vasquez was not in literal prison, I don’t think it’s a question he’d be banned for life (that might happen anyway; he’s due for release this month). Franco is much more in that category than he is in the sexual assault/Bauer category. If that’s what he’s doing, he’s never going to play again and it isn’t going to be controversial in any arena.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

Yes if he goes to prison then he isn’t getting paid at least until he gets out, and maybe even after that. But I have no idea what the legal system is like in the DR or what sort of documentation of the crimes there are (there was a LOT in the Vazquez case) so I am not speculating on the outcome of the case.

dl80Member since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

If he gets any jail time, I’m guessing he’ll be banned permanently.

sogoodlooking
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

“Known but not convicted” is often the case. So, ‘known.’

g4Member since 2020
2 years ago

Zeile had 2,000 hits? *Todd* Zeile? Shut my mouth.

rosen380
2 years ago
Reply to  g4

A very similar number of hits as Jeff Conine and Mark Grudzielanek… being a decent overall player for a reasonably long time is one path to 2000 hits.

FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
2 years ago
Reply to  rosen380

Nick Markakis!!!

68FCMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

I appreciate the amount of discourse that was devoted to how the HOF cases of Markakis, Starlin Castro, and Elvis Andrus were going to be handled when they got to 3,000 hits as if it was a high probability occurrence.

AnonMember since 2025
2 years ago
Reply to  68FC

and before them it was Johnny Damon and Juan Pierre. Funny how none of those guys ever actually make it there though,

68FCMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Anon

Really the only guy who isn’t a clear cut HOFer by the numbers with 3,000 hits is Lou Brock and he just got in on the first ballot without much fuss. The guys without the numbers tend to fizzle out before they get there because it is just very difficult to be a full time player in your early 20s and late 30s without being pretty darn good in your prime.

PC1970Member since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  68FC

True..but, Brock retired in 1979, so his induction in 1985 was WAY before we had current evaluation tools.

At the time he held the all time SB mark (still 2nd) & had the 2nd best in-season SB total, was a 6x All Star, etc.He was also a great player in postseason play & in helping STL win 2 WS titles in 3 appearances.

I’d compare him to Kirby Puckett in that he was just overrated & considered a star,when he just wasn’t. Guys like Markakis, Castro, Pierre were NEVER considered THAT good. Damon may have been a similar case, if he had gotten to 3,000 hits.

Lanidrac
2 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

Lou Brock was still a superstar, just not as great of one as many people think.

Still, he is pretty overrated. He’s still considered as about the 5th greatest Cardinals player (behind Musial, Gibson, Hornsby, and Pujols) by most Cardinals fans despite ranking 13th in Cardinals bWAR. Not counting future Hall of Famers Pujols and Molina, that ranking also falls behind 3 guys who didn’t or won’t make the Hall of Fame at all (and not because of PEDs or being banned): Ken Boyer, Curt Flood, and the soon-to-retire Adam Wainwright. While Brock didn’t play his entire career with the Cardinals, he still played a very high 87.5% of his games with them, which is a higher percentage than Boyer did.

Last edited 2 years ago by Lanidrac
docgooden85Member since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

The Ultimate Replacement Player for corner OFs

sogoodlooking
2 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

127th all-time on the Hit list.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
2 years ago
Reply to  g4

As a result of him working on the Mets broadcasts (mostly pre/post-game shows) they fairly regularly bring up various Zeile stats and record marks that force me to concede the guy was (a) much better than I gave him credit for at the time and (b) a Zelig-like figure for his era of baseball, constantly cropping up all over the place. He’s on more leaderboards than you’d think for stuff like homers and hits at specific stadiums, against specific teams or particular very good pitchers.

sogoodlooking
2 years ago

It’s a pity he’s of the generation that tends to shout into the microphone because he’s talking to people he can’t see.

slamcactusMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  g4

Juan Pierre is the one who always gets me, and he cleared 2,000 with plenty of hits to spare. When a guy gets mostly written off as a singles hitter in a power era it’s easy to forget he hit a lot of singles.

sogoodlooking
2 years ago
Reply to  slamcactus

Gets a bad rap for some reason. In his prime, 2001-2007 he hit .301, took his walks (.348 OBP), and averaged 97 runs scored and 160 games played. A little above average in CF, too.

PC1970Member since 2024
2 years ago

I love how Freeman’s hit projection WENT UP after the 60 game COVID year.

I guess that’s what a great year with a .341 BA & more BB than K’s will do for you.

ALLluckNOtalentMember since 2017
2 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

this was absolutely my biggest takeaway. I had to double check I was reading chart right. That is some serious upward trajectory in long term to do that.

top1214
2 years ago

I’m surprised Bryce Harper doesn’t have a decent shot. Just saw that he was something like the 18th youngest guy to 1500, but I guess his aging curve and injury risk aren’t great at this point.

top1214
2 years ago
Reply to  top1214

It was 18th guy to 1500 hits and 300HR before 31. That’s way different.

PC1970Member since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  top1214

He also walks too much..which is great for his value, but, not for picking up hits.

His career high in hits is 172 and he only has 1 more year over 150

darren
2 years ago
Reply to  top1214

Harper and Machado are tricky because they reach milestones at young ages in part because of how young they were when they made it to the Majors.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  top1214

It’s gotta be injury risk. I was thinking about this wrt to Corey Seager, as he’s basically the 99th percentile outcome of Luis Arraez…but a lock to miss ~50g a year. How do you project a guy like that?

68FCMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  top1214

It took him 12 full seasons to reach 1,500 hits, it presumably would take him longer to get the next 1,500 since performance typically declines and time missed to injury tends to increase after 30. 12 more seasons would get be through his age 43 season and well after his Phillies contract has ended. Maybe he can keep going through age 44-45 as a semi-regular, but I suspect the odds of that are below the 0.5% threshold for the chart.

rosen380
2 years ago
Reply to  68FC

Granted, despite the injuries he’s still 48th all-time in PA through age 30. Limiting the list to those who debuted at 19, are no longer active and debuted 1962 onward (min 5000 PA ages 19-30):

NAME PA19-30 PA 31+
Edgar Renteria 7409 1657
Ken Griffey Jr. 7319 3985
Andruw Jones 7276 1388
Rusty Staub 6961 4268
Adrián Beltré 6877 5253
Justin Upton 6808 841
Johnny Bench 6759 1910
Alan Trammell 6472 2903
Cesar Cedeno 6389 1744
Tim Raines 6159 4200
Ivan Rodriguez 6062 4208
Joe Morgan 5939 5390
Aurelio Rodriguez 5929 1149
Bob Bailey 5799 1244
Juan Gonzalez 5779 1376
Jose Cardenal 5776 1920
Greg Luzinski 5762 1752
Gregg Jefferies 5687 385
Claudell Washington 5676 1691
Gary Sheffield 5548 5399
Tim Foli 5483 1090
Jeff Burroughs 5343 1106
B.J. Upton 5319 539
Bobby Murcer 5305 2413
Bill Buckner 5251 4782
John Mayberry 5224 1222
Jack Clark 5112 3113

The correlation, for this group, between PA ages 19-30 and 31+ is only 0.14.

The correlation for total WAR between the two periods is also low, but not quite as low, at 0.34. The correlation for fWAR rate is a little higher than that, at 0.47.

Trimming the bottom of the list, so that all of the players are +/-1000 of Harper’s 19-30 PA, the average player added 40.8% more PA and 30.1% more fWAR.

If Harper does that, he’s looking at 60.9 fWAR in 9029 PA for his career. Similar to (relatively recent players like):
Alan Trammell
Willie Stargell
Kenny Lofton
Joe Torre
Willie Randolph
Ryne Sandberg
Keith Hernandez
Joey Votto
Yadier Molina

slamcactusMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  top1214

He needs 1,496 more hits in his 30s and hasn’t played a 150+ game season since 2019. Not impossible, but I wouldn’t bet on it.

BobMember since 2016
2 years ago

Freeman is now 34 and getting better. He is showing no signs of slowing down and accepting ZiPS’ projections. He will have his first 200+ hit season at age 34!

darren
2 years ago
Reply to  Bob

He must accept his ZIPS fate like a hang glider accepts gravity!

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  darren

How do we measure aging curves? Everyone is different and I refuse to accept that Freddie Freeman, still playing everyday and at a very high level, has to be lumped in with Andruw Jones who was washed up at 30. What is gained by guessing how this great player is going to play as he ages? As of this moment he has not shown any sign whatsoever of any decline. Of course there will be a time when it happens but there can’t be any way to predict when Father Time wins but I would put my money on Freeman still being a productive player for much longer than the average, and he has already done more than enough to be a Hall of Fame player.

Jonathan Vander LugtMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

Freeman’s aging curve is based on players who performed similarly at similar ages as him, roughly. Since he is already far more productive at a later age than Jones ever was, Jones’ late-career production is not likely to be factoring in much for what ZiPS thinks Freeman is going to do. The projections above more or less do show that Freeman is expected to be a Hall of Famer by the time he retires.

And, as a caveat – for every Adrian Beltre who stays good basically until the end, there are just as many or more dudes that flame out at right around Freeman’s current age. Miguel Cabrera sure looked like he was defying aging curves through his age-33 season. Then he got hurt, stunk, and couldn’t ever get healthy enough to find his stride again and has basically been washed for five years.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
2 years ago

I have no side in this debate. All I ask is for somebody to tell me who is going to age well and I question whether projection systems are better than the eye test. It is a guess, pure and simple, and teams are making some awful guesses. Tell me now when Freddie Freeman is going to stop being a productive player. I don’t know and you don’t know. If it is that obvious that performance drops off a cliff at a certain age then why are GM’s signing aging players to long term contracts that carry the player well into their declining years. Is it really a viable plan of operation to pay Xander Bogaerts $280 million for what is possibly an average of $60-70M/year for actual productive seasons. These teams are playing the same guessing game that is the point of this debate but some seem to be trying to defy the aging curve to the point of absurdity. My guess is that Freddie Freeman will be closer to Adrian Beltre than Miguel Cabrera.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
2 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

If it is that obvious that performance drops off a cliff at a certain age then why are GM’s signing aging players to long term contracts that carry the player well into their declining years. 

To obtain their services in their prime years, obviously.

Travis LMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

But surely you think a reasonable approach is to take the outside view of comparable players and see how they age, right? It’s not a “guess, pure and simple” – it’s an educated guess. Just like every projection is.

If you value the eye test over comps, I would be happy to place wagers with you :).

Jason BMember since 2017
2 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

All I ask is for somebody to tell me who is going to age well”

Elizabeth Hurley
Jennifer Lopez
Cindy Crawford
Mario Lopez
Halle Berry

Sleepy
2 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

AC Slater totally played in the NFL until he was 40.

The Duke
2 years ago

If anyone thinks a plus-sized 1B who’s been a metronome his entire career can’t decline rapidly in his mid 30s, please look at last year’s NL MVP.

68FCMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  The Duke

Goldschmidt’s decline looks pretty graceful if you don’t include 2022. Going from MVP to 3.5-4 WAR at age 35 looks like a sudden decline, but it is about 1 WAR under what he was averaging from ages 28-31.

If Freeman returns to the ~4.5 WAR player he was in his late 20s next year, it will feel like a drop from where he is now, but would hardly be a rapid decline in the scope of his career.

slamcactusMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  68FC

Yeah, I think Votto’s the better example. His age-33 season was even better than Freeman’s has been, but it was his last great year.

slamcactusMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  The Duke

Joey Votto, age 31-33: .320/.449/.557, 167 OPS+
Joey Votto, age 34-36: .265/.382/.420, 110 OPS+

His OPS+ by year in that time: 174, 160, 167, 126, 95, 107

And while he’s had injuries at different times in his career, those were all full seasons (at least 140G in each of the full seasons, 54G in the shortened 2020 season).

Even the best of the best aren’t guaranteed a gentle, sloping downward curve, much less a plateau.

darren
2 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

I just wanted to say the hang glider thing.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

It probably doesn’t hurt that Freddie Freeman seems to be able to play without taking days off, and that he has been exceptionally durable. I’m not entirely sure how he can keep doing that as he moves into his 30s but his past record has been very good.

Yesterday, in the Sunday notes column the quiz was about who had played in the most games. Pete Rose’s record of 3562 is probably unreachable because he kept playing even when he was bad (being his own manager probably didn’t help there) and because it’s a lot harder to juice now compared to the past. Freddie Freeman is 6th among active players with 1871. If he averages 155 games a year going forward (which would be quite a feat) he would have to play another eleven years until he was 45 to top Rose. Like Pete Rose, actually. It would take him 8 years to top Rickey Henderson (#4 on the list); it would take him 7 years to top Rusty Staub (at #14).

soddingjunkmailMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Looks like only 10 members of the 3,000 games played club.

Dan!

How many games does Zips project him to play over that 8 year projection?

v2miccaMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I remember coming into the 2019 season the media was questioning Freeman’s long-term durability. (He missed significant time in both the 2015 and 2017 seasons due to injuries and finished the 2018 season in a power slump that saw him get post-season surgery to remove bone spurs in his elbow) He then proceeds to rattle off a chain of Iron Man type seasons and everyone quickly gets the memo that the narrative changed regarding his longevity.

Handsome Wes
2 years ago

Wander Franco only 9%? I bet he’s crushed that he isn’t in the teens

(I’m going to get banned, aren’t I)

Pepper Martin
2 years ago

I’m more interested in the question: assuming Gerrit Cole gets there, will there ever again be a pitcher to get 200 wins in a career?

deucebigalow4
2 years ago
Reply to  Pepper Martin

Great question. It would be fun to see a Divisional Era breakdown of each inning where decisions (W/L) are determined vs. a regression analysis of the length of starts. That would provide a baseline projection of a pitchers’s decision rate.

Maybe ZiPS already accounts for this (along with injury risk and age decline), but running the odds in those terms would be an interesting exercise.

FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
2 years ago

Surprised Soto is projected so high. He just walks way too much to accumulate a significant amount of hits.

68FCMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

I would guess it is largely a reflection of how young he came up (he’s not yet 25 and already has 752 career hits) and ZiPS thinking he will age well enough to play for a long time.

Averaging 150 hits a year through his age 39 season would get him there. At 530 ABs a year (which is what he will have averaged over the last 3 years if he meets his ROS projection) that would take a .283 BA, which is just about his career BA. Of course that assumes very good health and maintaining his career BA that he has been well under the last couple years, but the path is still there.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

Also two years, now, of good-not-great batting averages. He’s awesome, without question. But 3k hits requires…well…getting more hits.

Barney Coolio
2 years ago

In 2004, there were so many guys with 2000+ hits.

I am 39. For the past 4 years, I have compiled an annual “all older than me team.” This year, I couldn’t do it as the only hitters older than me were Nelson Cruz, Miguel Cabrera, and Joey Votto. I think next year there will be no hitters.

There used to be so many more guys in their 40s. I remember in 2007, the Mets had 4 guys in their 40s in the starting lineup. 3b Jeff Conine, P Tom Glavine, LF Moises Alou, C Sandy Alomar Jr. They also had Julio Franco on that team. Around this time, the Giants had an ancient outfield.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  Barney Coolio

I’d be curious to see median age of MLB players over time, as surely, it’s gone down (whether due to old school “play the vets” guys mostly gone and/or to depress costs), with only a handful of celebrity/future HoF types (Greinke, Votto, Cabrera) hanging out.

FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
2 years ago

I just think it’s harder for a 40-something to adapt to todays game. For pitchers, it’s very hard to survive with below average velo. For hitters, it’s all to catch up to the cheese as your reaction time slows. This of course would change if the players had access to a certain nutritional supplement.

CousinNicky
2 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

This is def a major part, i think Chipper did an interview while at the end of his playing days saying he had to start guessing on 4 seam fastballs because he couldnt catch up like he used to (and his incredible baseball knowledge allowed him to guess correct more often than not).

Go check avg 4 seam fastball velocity in the past 15 years its almost perfect(stupid 2018) in how every year pitchers are throwing harder than the years past.

The other factor is moneyball and teams know they can get similar if not better value out of a 23 year making league min, than a 15 year vet on decent sized contract that might crash and burn leaving them on the hook for a massive money.

slamcactusMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  CousinNicky

All great points but we’re missing one more pretty huge factor that differentiates the 90s-early 00s from now, and it relates pretty closely to the ability of older players to return from injury.

Without casting aspersions on any individual players (other than, you know, all of them, the game as a whole, and the cynics who profiteered from them then but who clutch their pearls now), I think we can say with a fair amount of confidence that PEDs lengthened careers.

Pepper Martin
2 years ago

This isn’t necessarily true; traditionally, the oldest players in the game have always been crafty lefthanded pitchers. Such as current oldest player Rich Hill.

sourbob
2 years ago

If I inputted the numbers right (and that’s debatable, as I skipped the COVID year and used Freddie’s 2019 numbers), Bill James’ Favorite Toy has him at a 16% chance. That sounds about right overall, but I could see FF putting up 570 hits over the next three years to improve those odds considerably.

calkal1994
2 years ago

Wondering how much the shift ban has aided players like Freeman and Altuve, if at all.

ColonelMustard
2 years ago
Reply to  calkal1994

Definitely helps Altuve. He’s snuck plenty of grounders through on the pull side that were outs in previous seasons. Even his swinging bunts/weak grounders bear more fruit since they are scooped by infielders having to range further and make more difficult throws.

I don’t think he’ll get that close to 3K though. Small levers and declining athleticism are a brutal crunch. His last several seasons(including this one) have established him as a HOFer in my book. Fastest player ever to 2000 Hits/200 Hrs/200 SBs. Second fastest is now Willie Mays… What a badass

MorboTheAnnihilator
2 years ago

I’ll take the under on Wander Franco getting to 2000 hits at this point

ColonelMustard
2 years ago

I think the ban on the shift will lead to higher hit totals than we’ve seen recently. There’s so much incentive to try and pull in the air and with the shift ban, more of your pulled grounders become singles(and occasionally doubles/triples).

Unless the shift ban is removed or the juiced ball makes a comeback, developing a pull approach seems like the winning strategy for the vast majority of hitters who don’t have oppo power

SolitaireMember since 2020
2 years ago

Do I understand it right that before Freddie Freeman had a single MLB appearance ZiPS projected him for 1850 hits? And that after 24 PA of .167 AVG, 0% BB, 33% K it upped the projection to 2116? That’s some impressive confidence.

PhilMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  Solitaire

I’d guess that he was great in AAA as a 20 year old was the mean reason – he had a 141wRC+ – which is one point below his career wRC+. Reaching the majors at 20 is pretty impressive – even though he struggled.

SolitaireMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Phil

I see what you’re saying, I’m just pretty amazed by the scale of it. 2116 hits puts you in the 98th percentile of all major leaguers. Great AAA seasons at the age of 20 are rare and a great indicator of future success, but I would never have guessed a projection system to say “as many hits as Joe Mauer / Duke Snider / Paul O’Neill” based off minor league numbers. As he’s done it, perhaps I should not have been surprised, but I am.

68FCMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Solitaire

I wish I could pull up the exact number, but I recall Jay Jaffe citing that something like 25% of players who play in the bigs as teenagers make the HOF. Making the bigs at a very young age tends to have a very strong correlation with career success.

sogoodlooking
2 years ago
Reply to  Phil

Though abysmal at 19 in AA after his promotion (.650 OPS). 1850 H is a lot of H, presumably as his median, especially if based largely on one year in a AAA of uncertain competition (most minor league competition is uncertain). Based on that kind of reasoning, Zips almost had to be projecting Alonso based on his unbroken success in the minors, to hit vast numbers of HR in the majors, though currently it isn’t. I’d be interested to see Alonso’s Zips projection during the winter of 2018-19.

coolcoolcoolMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  sogoodlooking

I think you’re underestimating the impact of age on these types of projections. Freeman reach AA at 19 and the majors at 20 (first full season was at 21). Alonso was 3-4 years older for each of those milestones. A 23 year old splitting time between AA and AAA putting up ~160 wRC+ combined is a great prospect, but his age would likely have dampened the long term projections.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
2 years ago
Reply to  Solitaire

Another way of thinking about it… ZiPS projected him for 1850 hits after an age-19 season where he did very well at A+ and got the bat knocked out of his hands at AA. After an age-20 season where he dominated AAA and had that unimpressive but tiny sample in the majors, it upped him to 2116. Probably eliminating the chance of never making the majors made a difference, as is knowing how soon he had made the majors.

fanofthemanMember since 2020
2 years ago

I’ve said before here that very few players ever project to make the Hall of Fame. Most of the time, you get to the Hall of Fame by crushing any reasonable projections for about a decade. That can be coming up at 19 and raking for a decade (Trout), by establishing a new talent level at 31 and maintaining it for a decade (Beltre), or by extending your peak way beyond what seems reasonable (Freeman). Of those groups, it’s only ever really the young over performers who could ever “coast” into the HOF on just their baseline projections, and then it’s still mostly because the start with such an advantage.

docgooden85Member since 2018
2 years ago

Freddie Freeman is the Chuck Norris of baseball. Of course he will get 3000 hits! It’s kind of disappointing that he wears batting gloves but that’s why there’s only one literal Chuck Norris.

PC1970Member since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  docgooden85

He wears batting gloves to protect the bat from his hands. Without the gloves, he would just be able to grind the bat handle into dust when he tightened his grip.

kergarin
2 years ago

Freeman is signed through 2027, which leaves him at 2,683 hits if the projections hold up. Would Dodgers extend him at that point? Would Freddy even go for it?? His son Charlie would be playing Little League ball at that point and maybe he would just be fine coaching him …

TKDCMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  kergarin

Betting against a MLB player continuing to play if offered a MLB contract is usually a bad move.

fartinyourface
2 years ago

He can do anything as long as he isn’t stopped by his evil twin Freddy Fermin

Overlord1317
2 years ago

You can go ahead and cross Wander Franco off any all such lists.

sogoodlooking
2 years ago
Reply to  Overlord1317

Funny how ready a group of analytical guys so often is to declare guilt in the absence of a verdict, and without evidence they’ve had a chance to examine. Says a lot about you, in fact.

Lanidrac
2 years ago

Perhaps no 3,000 hit club member declined in batting average after his 20s as much as Albert Pujols:
Pujols in his 20s: .334 AVG
Pujols in his 30s/40s: .266 AVG