Can the Struggling Astros Turn Their Season Around?

The Houston Astros have a knack for disappointing Aprils. Despite usually being projected as the favorite or second favorite in the AL West every year for the last decade, the last time the Astros didn’t have a losing record at some point in the second half of April was 2019. But year after year, they’ve tended to get a powerful second wind. Excluding 2020, for obvious reasons, they haven’t finished with fewer than 87 wins in a season since 2016; overall, Houston has the second-most wins in baseball since the start of the 2017 season. During those previous mediocre starts, the projections have stood by the Astros. This time… not so much.
To see the last time the Astros started this dreadfully, you don’t have to go back very far. In 2024, they hit their nadir after 26 games, at 7-19. I wrote then, as I do now, about the hole they were digging for themselves. Though it was still an uphill battle to come back in the AL West — they in fact did, handily — the projections never turned sour. ZiPS projected the Astros to win 88 games going into that season, and despite their 7-16 record at the time I wrote that article, the computer still thought they’d continue to win games at the previously predicted rate.
| Team | W | L | GB | Pct | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% | 80th | 20th |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas Rangers | 86 | 76 | — | .531 | 41.0% | 18.3% | 59.3% | 5.1% | 94.1 | 79.2 |
| Seattle Mariners | 85 | 77 | 1 | .525 | 30.7% | 19.2% | 50.0% | 3.8% | 92.1 | 77.4 |
| Houston Astros | 83 | 79 | 3 | .512 | 23.1% | 17.9% | 41.0% | 3.5% | 90.3 | 75.2 |
| Los Angeles Angels | 75 | 87 | 11 | .463 | 5.1% | 7.1% | 12.2% | 0.4% | 82.3 | 67.3 |
| Oakland A’s | 61 | 101 | 25 | .377 | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 68.6 | 53.6 |
ZiPS does not have the same optimism that it had in 2024.
| Team | W | L | GB | Pct | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% | 80th | 20th |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seattle Mariners | 87 | 75 | — | .537 | 48.9% | 18.2% | 67.1% | 7.0% | 93.5 | 80.3 |
| Texas Rangers | 83 | 79 | 4 | .512 | 28.3% | 20.2% | 48.5% | 2.7% | 90.3 | 76.5 |
| Athletics | 79 | 83 | 8 | .488 | 15.8% | 15.6% | 31.3% | 0.9% | 87.0 | 72.5 |
| Houston Astros | 75 | 87 | 12 | .463 | 5.0% | 8.0% | 13.0% | 0.5% | 81.7 | 68.1 |
| Los Angeles Angels | 72 | 90 | 15 | .444 | 1.9% | 3.5% | 5.4% | 0.1% | 78.1 | 65.0 |
This time around, ZiPS doesn’t even think Houston is a .500 team the rest of the way, let alone one that’ll end up close to its projected record in the preseason. The Astros had a relatively deep rotation in 2024, especially compared to today, and at the time, basically all of their starters were injured. But ZiPS thought enough pitching would filter back in over the coming weeks to get the team back on track. However, in 2026, ZiPS only loves one Houston pitcher, Hunter Brown, and just a few days ago, general manager Dana Brown said Brown won’t be back until June, and that’s if there are no setbacks.
Projecting the Astros to have a sub-.500 record isn’t something that ZiPS does often. While I don’t have rest-of-season projections for every calendar date ever, I do have monthly updates, and the last time they were projected to finish with a losing record was the 2015 preseason, when they had a 77-85 projection for the year. Pinpointing the actual date by running a few more simulations, the last time before 2026 that Houston was projected to be a losing team over the rest of a season was almost exactly 11 years ago, on April 26, 2015, when a win over the Oakland Athletics improved the team’s record to 10-7 and its rest-of-season projected winning percentage to .49927.
The 2026 Astros have been this bad even as their offense has performed extremely well. They lead the American League with 5.21 runs per game, and their 118 wRC+ ranks fourth in baseball, to go along with 5.7 WAR from their position players, also good for fourth in the majors. Considering this, the Astros shouldn’t bank on an offensive surge to turn their season around. Instead, if Houston is going to make up ground in the standings, its pitching is going to have to improve.
If you’ve ever had the misfortune to follow election night coverage, you might have seen the various news desks give benchmarks for a particular candidate to beat in counties or in states to be on target to win. I can do the same kind of thing with ZiPS, so I asked it to benchmark what ERAs Houston’s pitching staff would have to hit to give the team a 50% chance of making the playoffs.
| Pitcher | Astros 50% Playoffs ERA | ROS ZiPS Projected ERA | ROS Depth Charts Projected ERA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Burrows | 3.66 | 4.28 | 4.22 |
| Tatsuya Imai | 3.55 | 4.11 | 4.15 |
| Lance McCullers Jr. | 4.17 | 4.64 | 4.45 |
| Hunter Brown | 2.68 | 2.93 | 3.28 |
| Spencer Arrighetti | 3.85 | 4.15 | 4.41 |
| Cristian Javier | 4.47 | 4.69 | 4.86 |
| Peter Lambert | 3.90 | 4.40 | 4.57 |
| Ryan Weiss | 4.02 | 4.28 | 4.31 |
| Jason Alexander | 4.51 | 4.65 | 4.35 |
| Kai-Wei Teng | 4.13 | 4.54 | 4.52 |
| Hayden Wesneski | 3.97 | 4.40 | 4.02 |
| Ronel Blanco | 3.89 | 4.23 | 4.09 |
| Josh Hader | 2.37 | 3.32 | 3.26 |
| Bryan Abreu | 2.79 | 3.47 | 3.43 |
| Enyel De Los Santos | 3.46 | 3.86 | 4.17 |
| Bryan King | 2.96 | 3.59 | 3.63 |
| Steven Okert | 3.21 | 3.60 | 3.90 |
| AJ Blubaugh | 4.03 | 4.57 | 4.47 |
| Bennett Sousa | 2.82 | 3.79 | 3.80 |
| Nate Pearson | 3.98 | 4.57 | 4.28 |
| Jayden Murray | 4.16 | 4.45 | 4.61 |
| Cody Bolton | 4.26 | 4.62 | 4.46 |
| Colton Gordon | 4.05 | 4.54 | 4.32 |
TLDR: To be a coin flip to make the playoffs, if the offense performs as expected, the Astros need their pitching staff to collectively outperform their projected ERAs by about half a run per nine innings. This is true whether or not you use the ZiPS projections or the combined Steamer/ZiPS Depth Charts projections. Just to illustrate how hard that is for a team to do, I prorated the preseason 2025 ZiPS projected ERAs to the actual innings pitched, and compared those to the final team ERAs for that year.
| Team | Team ERA | Projected ZiPS ERA | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas Rangers | 3.49 | 4.33 | -0.83 |
| Milwaukee Brewers | 3.59 | 4.07 | -0.48 |
| Cincinnati Reds | 3.86 | 4.35 | -0.48 |
| Kansas City Royals | 3.73 | 4.17 | -0.43 |
| Chicago White Sox | 4.28 | 4.63 | -0.35 |
| Pittsburgh Pirates | 3.76 | 4.09 | -0.33 |
| San Diego Padres | 3.64 | 3.91 | -0.26 |
| Chicago Cubs | 3.81 | 4.00 | -0.19 |
| Boston Red Sox | 3.72 | 3.91 | -0.19 |
| Cleveland Guardians | 3.70 | 3.88 | -0.18 |
| Philadelphia Phillies | 3.79 | 3.96 | -0.17 |
| New York Yankees | 3.91 | 4.01 | -0.11 |
| Houston Astros | 3.86 | 3.88 | -0.02 |
| Tampa Bay Rays | 3.94 | 3.94 | 0.00 |
| San Francisco Giants | 3.84 | 3.80 | 0.04 |
| New York Mets | 4.04 | 3.94 | 0.10 |
| Detroit Tigers | 3.97 | 3.85 | 0.13 |
| Los Angeles Dodgers | 3.95 | 3.81 | 0.14 |
| Seattle Mariners | 3.87 | 3.68 | 0.19 |
| Miami Marlins | 4.60 | 4.34 | 0.26 |
| St. Louis Cardinals | 4.30 | 4.04 | 0.26 |
| Toronto Blue Jays | 4.19 | 3.87 | 0.32 |
| Athletics | 4.71 | 4.28 | 0.43 |
| Los Angeles Angels | 4.89 | 4.44 | 0.45 |
| Baltimore Orioles | 4.62 | 4.00 | 0.62 |
| Minnesota Twins | 4.55 | 3.88 | 0.67 |
| Arizona Diamondbacks | 4.49 | 3.81 | 0.68 |
| Atlanta Braves | 4.36 | 3.65 | 0.71 |
| Washington Nationals | 5.35 | 4.55 | 0.80 |
| Colorado Rockies | 5.99 | 4.85 | 1.14 |
Only a single team, the Texas Rangers, outperformed its ERA projections by more than half a run. The Brewers and Reds came close, but they fell a bit further back when adjusting for the fact that ZiPS thought the league-wide ERA would be 0.12 higher than it actually was.
Now, consider the very real possibility that the Houston offense doesn’t merely perform as expected, but hits its 75th-percentile projection instead. The pitching would still have to beat its projections by 0.33 runs per game, meaning that even in a rosy scenario like this for the lineup, this team would still be an underdog.
On a fundamental level, the Astros need to find better pitchers from among the guys who aren’t currently envisioned by Depth Charts as contributors, and they need to find them right now. Ethan Pecko is the most interesting of the internal options, and as a fellow Towson native, I can’t help but root for him. He’s currently working back from thoracic outlet syndrome, and though he’s been very good on his minor league rehab assignment, he’s not likely to be up until later this summer. When he does return, he wouldn’t be enough by himself to fix this pitching staff, even if he had a Chase Burns-esque debut. AJ Blubaugh and Colton Gordon don’t project as instant game-changers, either. Houston would likely need to acquire some pitching, but from where? This has been an odd season so far, in that many of the worst teams (Astros, Red Sox, Mets, Phillies, Blue Jays, Royals) were expected to be contenders. That means there aren’t a lot of teams looking to be early sellers. But even if there were, these other underperforming clubs would likely be fierce competition for those players on the block.
Time is not on Houston’s side, in the short or long term. The short-term challenge is obvious, but the long-term one is nearly as daunting. The Astros are second in baseball in wRC+ from players over 30 years old (129), with Jose Altuve and Christian Walker both at ages when imminent decline is highly likely. Their two key offensive players in their 20s, Jeremy Peña and Yordan Alvarez, are free agents after 2027 and 2028, respectively. At the end of last season, our prospect team ranked Houston’s farm system 29th out of 30 teams. The best solution might be to do a bit of retooling, perhaps by trading anyone unsigned past this year. Then, assuming there’s a pre-lockout window to make some free agent signings as there was in 2021, absolutely blitz the top guys available with extremely generous one-year offers, with the hope that many of those players will want to get a second look at free agency in a hopefully normal winter after the 2027 season. But truth be told, this doesn’t really feel like something the Astros would do.
However it shakes out, this may be the most crucial period of Brown’s stint as GM. The Houston Astros are in a precarious position, and none of the options look particularly appealing. Some problems simply don’t have good solutions, and if they can’t conjure one up, we may be looking at the end of a moderately successfully dynasty in Houston.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
It’s the Astros. For the last 10 years I’ll only count them out when the math literally won’t work!
Meaning something more than the math above, I take it? But I get your point.
Props for not making the obvious trash can reference.
The biggest thing in their favor is that the Mariners also got out to a lousy start, meaning that they’re only 3 games back from them. And only 4.5 games back of the Athletics. Whose pitching is also not good.
I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say that their season depends mostly on how quickly Hunter Brown and Tatsuya Imai return from their injuries and whether they are at full strength. And whether their other functional starters like Burrows, Arrighetti, and Teng can avoid getting hurt and keep being collectively as functional as they have been so far.
I think I would take the Phillies or Mets in a seven game series against the Astros but those two teams are over 10 games back (as of now). That is a significant hole to dig yourself out of. It’s more likely we see the Astros making up 4.5 games on the Astros and Mariners than the Phillies / Mets making up 10.5 games on the Braves.
Seeing anything w Lambert? I know we can’t just look at his best starts, and he was horrible in Colorado but was good overseas and looks ok to start this season at least
I am as surprised as anyone about Lambert.
Since when are there benefits for finishing in 3rd place in the division (but still out of reach of a playoff spot) rather than 4th or last place?
There aren’t, but I would expect the Mariners to finish ahead of the Athletics even with them spotting the A’s two games. So they might not actually need to worry as much about being 4.5 games back from the A’s as much as they need to worry about being 3 games back from the Mariners.
Tatsuya Imai was the one unknown in their rotation with a lot of upside. He’s hurt and has been ineffective and said he was struggling to adapt. There is a reason the Dodgers do well attracting Japanese players they have built a lot of infrastructure to support them. Really though this keep seems to nearing the end they are not getting much help from their farm and they don’t like to spend to fill holes. They seem less and less talented each year.
I looked at the FG depth chart projections for the remainder of the season combined with the totals to date. Houston projects to end up with 46.5 fwar. That is usually good for 90+ wins. What accounts for the variance between that and the win total projections cited in this article? Are FGDC not updated as the season progresses (aside from adjusting remaining pa and ip totals)?
Nice
The total WAR can be misleading when heavily unbalanced between the position players and the pitchers.
Let’s hope not
Sincerely, fans of all the other teams
Best story in baseball, from my perspective and probably yours
“moderately successfully dynasty” 2x Champ, Made 4 WS, 7x CS, 9x postseason in 10 seasons. How many teams can claim to match that in the last 40 years? Dodgers, Yankees, and…??? Maybe Boston, depending on how you look at it. I would say no for the Giants even tho they somehow had 3 titles.
It’s definitely a dynasty. If you just google “Astros dynasty” dozens of reputable sports publications make that statement. The only team in MLB history to win a postseason series 7 straight seasons (apologies to the Braves for the 1994 strike).
You must define ‘dynasty’ differently in baseball than football and basketball for example. If you have a dominant player (Jordan, Kobe, LeBron | Brady, Mahomes, superstar QB Z) then you have an easier chance at winning based on the expectant outcome from 1 player and you must have 3 or so championships in a 5-6 year span to qualify as a dynasty.
Baseball is much more rigorous. A 25-26 man roster to account for, 13 pitchers, injuries, and as Boone stated, “playoffs is a crapshoot”.
How many 100-win teams lose in the first round yearly? The Braves won in 2021 then added Strider to their squad and won 100+ games in 2022 and 2023 and were outmatched by the Phillies both times and have not won a postseason series since 2021.
So, the difficulty and gravity to win in baseball is much higher in this sport than others, so yes, it is a full dynasty and not a “moderately successful” one.
Yeah I agree, Detroit had a nice run from 2006-2014 and didn’t get a WS Championship, and took 10 years to return to being interesting, so that Houston run looks really good to me.
Def a dynasty to me. People’s expectations from what the Yankees did many years back skew things quite a bit. Most playoff matches are 60-40s. Maybe the Yankees were so dominant that they were 70-30 or better.. but this ain’t the NBA. Usually you gotta win as a 2-1 favorite in the first round or lower, then again, then again, then again. Odds never in your favor over 4 series to win all 4. To me this is a feature not a bug…if the best team won there would be no point in playing. It’s the Dodgers, will be next year too…and probably for a couple years after that
I had the same reaction. “Moderately successful” seems to be vastly underselling Houston’s run. Almost no one ever does what they’ve been doing, although I am legally obligated to add the Big Red Machine to your list.
Technically, the Big Red Machine was over 40 years ago. If you’re counting them, you might as well count the Oakland Athletics from the same time period, including winning the World Series 3 years in a row from 1972-1974.
The Cardinals from 2000-2013 (or 2015?) come pretty close to that.
I’ll admit I chose the wording so that I could call them a dynasty, but mildly so, in order to avoid the fighting about what constitutes a dynasty which inevitably derails everything. Though it appears to have caused fighting about what constitutes a dynasty which inevitably derails everything!
Thanks. You didn’t have to respond, and I respect that you did.
People get caught up in the word dynasty. The Astros 10-year window was very very very good. So good that over the last 50 years I’d match it up vs anyone else’s 10-year window outside of the Yankees in the 90s/00s and current Dodgers.
I don’t have a clue whether one would classify the Giants from 2010-2014 as a dynasty. 3 world series in 5 years would seem to do it, but it sure didn’t feel like a dynasty. They didn’t have a winning record in 2013.
The Yankees and Dodgers are pretty unambiguous dynasties, and then things get complicated. I think you can order it like this:
Yankees 1996-2003: In 9 years they made the playoffs 9x, won the pennant 6x, and won the WS 4x. With three consecutive WS wins you could easily just include those 3 years and it would be an unambiguous dynasty.
Dodgers 2016-present: In 10 years they made the playoffs 10x, made the NLCS 7x, won the pennant 5x, and won WS 3x. If you wanted to you could narrow this to 2020-2025 and it would still work.
Red Sox 2004-2008: In 5 years they made the playoffs 4x, made the ALCS 3x, and won WS 2x. Hard to stretch it much further than that because they didn’t get out of the ALDS in 2009 and didn’t make the playoffs again until 2013 (they did win the WS though). Still, two WS in five years probably is enough.
Astros 2017-2023: This one is tricky because 2017 was the cheating year and because the WS wins were six years apart. But in 7 years they made the ALCS 7x (wow), won the pennant 4x, and won the WS 2x.
Giants: 2010-2014: 3 WS in 5 years.
Great article Dan, thanks a bunch for your hard work.
The 2026 Astros are looking like the 2023 Cardinals so far, a preseason playoff pick with a long run of success and a number of older veterans brought down by a widespread collapse of their pitching staff mostly through ineffectiveness rather than injuries.
So the answer is probably not. The question is when to sell. Peña seems like the most valuable trade chip. Alvarez also. Then Hader and Abreu. That’s a lot of chips.