Can Umpires Really Do Anything They Want?

There’s a saying in my profession that “the law is what the court says it is.” That’s a paraphrase of a famous line from Justice John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison that “[i]t is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” The point is that the law is open to interpretation, even if the words on the page are unchanging. Your interpretation, my interpretation, even Meg Rowley’s interpretation – none of that matters. The only interpretation that matters at the end of the day is that of the person wearing the robe.

When it comes to baseball, the judges are the umpires – as the recent Rangers-Astros series shows. Our saga begins in a rather ordinary fashion – with a questionable strike call. Per Chandler Rome at the Houston Chronicle:

In the next half-inning, [umpire Ron] Kulpa called a borderline first pitch strike against Tyler White. The entire Astros dugout charged toward the railing and erupted with vitriol toward Kulpa. Kulpa removed his mask and yelled back. [Astros Manager A.J.] Hinch came out to diffuse the situation and, at that point, no one was ejected.

[Houston coach Alex] Cintron did not cease his criticism. Kulpa tossed him as Hinch returned to the dugout. A pitch later, while Kulpa still stared into the Astros’ dugout, Hinch began to bark back. Kulpa ejected him.

Here’s video if you’d rather see for yourself:

But there’s more to this story. Evidently, Kulpa subscribes to the Marbury v. Madison school of umpiring power.

What happens when an umpire has a full blown meltdown? Just watch Kulpa. After Hinch returned to the dugout the second time, Kulpa kept looking over there, most likely waiting for a player or coach to make another comment. Hinch gave him what he wanted. He yelled “You can’t keep doing this!” at Kulpa, who immediately ejected Hinch, leading to an on-field screaming match and Kulpa shouting in Hinch’s face “I can do anything I want!”

Notably, Hinch wasn’t arguing balls and strikes when Kulpa ejected him.

Before even one more pitch was thrown, the umpire leered into the Houston dugout, essentially daring the players to say something. Hinch had to once again take the field to kindly ask the neutral game official to stop staring down his players. The mics picked up Hinch’s words to Kulpa: “There’s nothing to see. There’s nothing for you to see. Look out there. Look right there.”

And just to prove the point that he really, truly, could do anything he wanted, Kulpa proceeded to make himself the center of the spectacle, including initiating physical contact with catcher Max Stassi.

There’s a lot to unpack here, most notably, Kulpa’s assertion that, as an umpire, he can do anything he wants. But before we get there, we have to explain something.

By far the most common question I get from clients in my day job is “can s/he do that?” And my answer is always the same. The law isn’t a magic force that uses midichlorians to prevent a person from killing or stealing. A person can – in the sense of physical capability – do whatever they want. The only laws that can stop them are the laws of biology and physics.

What the law can do is punish people for doing those things. In essence, the law is a gigantic set of incentives and disincentives. The same applies to the rules of baseball and Ron Kulpa. Gandalf won’t appear to stop Kulpa from transgressing some rule on umpire conduct. So what we’re looking at here is not whether Kulpa is right in the literal sense, but rather whether there are limits in place that, were Kulpa to transgress them, provide for some kind of consequence.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The kind of power Kulpa is claiming is called plenary power, and we discussed it earlier this year in the context of commissioner Rob Manfred. Plenary power is “[p]ower that is wide-ranging, broadly construed, and often limitless for all practical purposes.”

But while the terms of the Major League Constitution grant the commissioner that kind of unlimited authority, there’s no such similar grant for umpires. Umpire duties are covered by Rule 4.01 of the Official Major League Rules, which includes things like ensuring alternate regulation baseballs are available, inspecting baseballs, and ensuring compliance with equipment specifications. In fact, to the extent the umpire’s power is delineated by a list of duties, essentially the entire baseball rulebook is a list of what the umpire can and should do. Nearly every rule tells the umpire what to do, because it’s the umpires who enforce the rules. If case law and statutes are an instruction manual for judges, then the Major League Baseball rulebook is an instruction manual for umpires.

But this is a non-exhaustive list, and it doesn’t say what an umpire can’t do. For that, we need Article 8.00, conveniently entitled “The Umpire.” In Rule 8.01, we learn what the umpire’s authority is.

8.01 Umpire Qualifications and Authority (a) The League President shall appoint one or more umpires to officiate at each league championship game. The umpires shall be responsible for the conduct of the game in accordance with these official rules and for maintaining discipline and order on the playing field during the game.
(b) Each umpire is the representative of the league and of professional baseball, and is authorized and required to enforce all of these rules. Each umpire has authority to order a player, coach, manager or club officer or employee to do or refrain from doing anything which affects the administering of these rules, and to enforce the prescribed penalties.
(c) Each umpire has authority to rule on any point not specifically covered in these rules.
(d) Each umpire has authority to disqualify any player, coach, manager or substitute for objecting to decisions or for unsportsmanlike conduct or language, and to eject such disqualified person from the playing field. If an umpire disqualifies a player while a play is in progress, the disqualification shall not take effect until no further action is possible in that play.
(e) Each umpire has authority at his discretion to eject from the playing field (1) any person whose duties permit his presence on the field, such as ground crew members, ushers, photographers, newsmen, broadcasting crew members, etc., and (2) any spectator or other person not authorized to be on the playing field.

Based on this, Ron Kulpa is partly right. As the personification of Major League Baseball on the field, the umpire does indeed have vast authority for “maintaining discipline and order.” And note that the umpire has authority to eject a person merely for objecting to a decision, and not only for unsportsmanlike conduct. The umpire can even eject a player in the middle of a play! This is, frankly, a poorly written rule; as written, the umpire can theoretically eject a manager who asks for a replay review; by asking for that review, the manager is, by definition, objecting to a ruling. And, most notably, Rule 8.01(c) basically says that where the Rules don’t cover something, the umpire has discretion to make up a rule.

This is obviously really broad authority, and, for the most part, the rest of Article 8.00 doesn’t get any less so. Rule 8.02, which governs appeals of umpire decisions, allows those appeals only to the umpire who made the decision in the first place. Under Rule 8.03, the umpire-in-chief (as in, the home plate umpire; this is not the same as the crew chief) has even more authority; he can “[a]nnounce any special ground rules, at his discretion.” (In this context, a “ground rule” is one that the umpire “thinks are made necessary by ground conditions, which shall not conflict with the official playing rules.”) In other words, if Ron Kulpa wanted to announce a Rule that any ball that hit the roof of Tropicana Field was a home run, he could do that. The umpires do have a lot of power.

If this were all there was in Article 8.00, Kulpa would probably be right. But there’s one more part of Article 8.00, entitled “General Instructions to Umpires.” They are, essentially, the rules that umpires are supposed to follow. Here are some excerpts.

  • Be courteous, always, to club officials; avoid visiting in club offices and thoughtless familiarity with officers or employees of contesting clubs.
  • When you enter a ball park your sole duty is to umpire a ball game as the representative of baseball. Do not allow criticism to keep you from studying out bad situations that may lead to protested games.  Carry your rule book.  It is better to consult the rules and hold up the game ten minutes to decide a knotty problem than to have a game thrown out on protest and replayed.
  • Keep the game moving.  A ball game is often helped by energetic and earnest work of the umpires.
  • You are the only official representative of baseball on the ball field. It is often a trying position which requires the exercise of much patience and good judgment, but do not forget that the first essential in working out of a bad situation is to keep your own temper and self-control.
  • Each umpire team should work out a simple set of signals, so the proper umpire can always right a manifestly wrong decision when convinced he has made an error. If sure you got the play correctly, do not be stampeded by players’ appeals to “ask the other man.” If not sure, ask one of your associates. Do not carry this to extremes, be alert and get your own plays.  But remember!  The first requisite is to get decisions correctly.  If in doubt don’t hesitate to consult your associate.  Umpire dignity is important but never as important as “being right.”
  • Most important rule for umpires is always “BE IN POSITION TO SEE EVERY PLAY.”  Even though your decision may be 100% right, players still question it if they feel you were not in a spot to see the play clearly and definitely.
  • Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.

Based on these instructions, there are things that Ron Kulpa can’t do. For one thing, he can’t be discourteous; he must be courteous “always.” He is supposed to keep a game moving. He is supposed to maintain his temper and self-control. And he is supposed to elevate being right above his own dignity.

And believe it or not, Major League Baseball really does enforce these rules. That is, the commissioner – who, remember, really does have plenary power – enforces these rules. Some umpires have been suspended or fined for misapplying rules or allowing teams to engage in rule violations. In fact, umpires get disciplined all the time.

Now, it’s true that the commissioner’s office has considerable latitude when it comes to disciplining umpires. In fact, the men with the chest protectors are chastened “frequently,” according to one source.

Some umpires are forced to sit because of poor performance. Just like a slumping slugger.

The difference is that, under the collective bargaining agreement between the umpires’ union and Major League Baseball, and unlike the players’ CBA, most discipline and disputes between the league and union are confidential. That’s why it was a big ruckus when umpires staged a brief protest, wearing white armbands to signify opposition to comments made by Ian Kinsler regarding Angel Hernandez. MLB immediately stated that the protest violated the umpires’ Collective Bargaining Agreement.

So Ron Kulpa can do whatever he wants; that’s true. And players and managers can’t do anything about it. But Major League Baseball can, and, often, does. Being an umpire is a difficult job. But omnipotence, it seems, doesn’t actually come with the territory.





Sheryl Ring is a litigation attorney and General Counsel at Open Communities, a non-profit legal aid agency in the Chicago suburbs. You can reach her on twitter at @Ring_Sheryl. The opinions expressed here are solely the author's. This post is intended for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice.

85 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
SyndergaardengnomesMember since 2020
7 years ago

I, for one, welcome our new robot umpire overlords.

radivel
7 years ago

“Some umpires are forced to sit because of poor performance.”
I would hope that Angel has his own personal chair in the office.

Roger21
7 years ago
Reply to  radivel

It’s actually a stool in the corner, right next to the hat rack where they keep the “Dunce” cap.

Monsignor Martinez
7 years ago

#automatethezone

Anonymous
7 years ago

The tech isn’t there yet, but they’re working on it!

Pirates HurdlesMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

They are testing it in the Atlantic League

fjtorres
7 years ago

It probably won’t pass muster.
The tech isn’t quite there. It needs to be both precise and consistent in detecting location. Nibblers will almost certainly give the system fits.

Cidron
7 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Others that will give the system fits are going to be those of odd sizes (overly tall, or overly small, compared to their peers). Or, are we going to put sensors into the uniforms??

Hank G.Member since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Cidron

All they would have to do would to be to measure the player’s strike zone in his normal stance. They could get the overwhelming majority of these done in spring training.

Another possibility would be to standardize the strike zone based on the players’ heights. Player’s who felt that the standard was not fair to them (“my knees are abnormally high for my height”) could ask for an adjustment.

I think this is one of the least of the potential issues. As I understand it, the current systems are not doing it in real time, but are taking a second or two to make the decision (this is separate from the drawn strike zone some networks show). That would be an intolerable delay in a game. They need to get the decision to be calculated in a fraction of a second for it to be usable.

evo34Member since 2023
7 years ago
Reply to  Hank G.

Or….just set a standard strike zone…kind of like a standard NBA hoop height or a standard goalpost width in the NFL.

DougMember since 2019
7 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

“Nibblers will almost certainly give the system fits.”

…much as they do today.

timprov
7 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Test cricket manages, I can’t imagine baseball would be unable to. Their ball moves more/weirder and often hits the batsman, but they can still tell whether it was going to hit the wicket.

v2miccaMember since 2016
7 years ago

I know this is an unpopular opinion, but this is why I hope that MLB one day divests itself of human umpires and uses some statcast like system for calling balls and strikes, and various other plays.

Jetsy Extrano
7 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

I wonder how it would work if the robots could make 98% of calls, leaving only a few per game for the umps. Could the umps stay alert and on every play just as well as now, or would it be hard for a human to keep focus?

If they could focus their attention to specific questions I bet it could work. But if their 2% covers all of the zillion odd things that can happen, that’s a tough job.

It’s like a mostly-self-driving car that just occasionally buzzes the person in the driver’s seat to say “look out the window and take the wheel, I’m stumped!” Which is a human factors disaster.

fjtorres
7 years ago
Reply to  Jetsy Extrano

The best way would be to use the tech to assist the ump rather than replace it.
Imagine a Hololens-style visor that records the path of the ball in 3d presenting the ump a thin “snake” highlighting its path vs a strike zone box based on the player’s height and stance and letting him change the viewpoint to see if it really crossed the strike zone over the. A well trained up could read the frozen scene in seconds, less time than the slower umps.

But that’s not the tech they’re testing.

Spahn_and_Sain
7 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Why bother with an AR system in the first place? If there’s a light snake that pops up after the pitch has gone by that’s going to visually overwhelm the view of the ball no one is going to be looking for it anyway (let’s ignore for the moment that the ball doesn’t spend even one frame refresh worth of time over the plate). May as well be a guy in a darkened room with a 3d mouse.

Cave Dameron
7 years ago

If umpires can do anything they want, how come they haven’t done two chicks at the same time? man

baycommuterMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

Because they get called out trying to stretch a single into a double.

Cidron
7 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

they get called out at home.

treinhal
7 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

Turns out the umpires would rather relax, sit on their ass all day, and do nothing

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
7 years ago

I buy a ticket to watch the baseball game, granted, but a once in a blue moon umpshow IS highly entertaining. I just never want to see it in a big game.

John Autin
7 years ago

Interesting column, but I don’t buy the “umps = judges” analogy. By system structure and their own behavior, they are much more like cops.

dl80Member since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Judges are also like cops in the courtroom. Umps are like lower-level courts, with the commissioner being the Supreme Court.

Ade
7 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

my thought as well – like cops, umpires can *mostly* do whatever they want; if they step grossly out of line, they may be privately disciplined and they get to keep their jobs

Careless
7 years ago
Reply to  Ade

Umpires have something like absolute immunity that judges have. Cops don’t have that. Despite the utter disgrace of qualified immunity, it doesn’t compare to what judges and umps can get away with

Kibber
7 years ago

anyone can do anything they want in a free will Universe which is where we all live
there is something called the Law of Allowance, folks should look this up and adjust accordingly
Namaste

OddBall Herrera
7 years ago
Reply to  Kibber

Well, I don’t know about you but this guy really sold me on kicking off a crime spree.

Later, all!

dl80Member since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Kibber

Michel Foucault points out that we have all basically self-policed ourselves with our decision to adhere to cultural norms that are artificial and subjective.

OddBall Herrera
7 years ago
Reply to  dl80

I agree on the self policing, but:

“artificial and subjective”

Either that or most of us have come to the understanding that we tend to live longer and happier lives in a society where people agree not to do certain things to each other.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
7 years ago

Norms are subjective. They vary (a) from one society to the next, (b) within a single society over time, and (c) within the same society at the same moment from one subclass of members to another.

Norms are artificial. We decide them. Actually, we don’t so much decide them as have them decided for us either by individuals in positions of power or by the forces of cultural conformity.

And yes. For the vast majority of us conforming to these artificial and subjective norms help us to leads longer and happier lives. That’s the point.

docgooden85Member since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

Why are happiness and longevity paramount to the exclusion of other values? Happiness is not an appropriate response to a whole host of common things. A person who is always happy is deranged, since it should be a fluctuating spectrum. And every single one of us will be dying, mostly sooner than we want or expect – immortality is not on the table.
I think there are better, and less selfish, goals that one could set for oneself, if one were not totally cowed by these arbitrary and capricious societal norms.

OddBall Herrera
7 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

Mostly what I’m reacting to is that this type of language is usually trotted out by people who are on their way towards dismissing societal norms as ‘mere prejudices’. Because they’re either arbitrary or instruments of the ruling class, right? Ergo, everything is permitted to a sufficiently broadened mind. A philosophy that is at best lazy, at worst dangerous.

fjtorres
7 years ago

There are three kinds of norms in any society: laws, enforced by the state and its monopoly on legal force, mores, enforced by the community and culture, and ethics, enforced by the individual based on their personal beliefs. Culture tries to shape ethics but it can’t enforce it.

There are times and places where mores supercede laws (c.f., jury nullification or the common fate of child murderers in prison) but in most modern societies the letter of the law supercedes morality. Didn’t used to be that way but shaming and shunning isn’t terrible common nowadays.

So in practice, anybody can do anything they want so long as they’re willing to face the consequences. And capable enough to evade punishment. Not an easy thing the latter.

I suspect Mr Kulpa will have some explaining to do in private.

mduffy
7 years ago

Sheryl,
What a great article! This is exactly why robot umpires should never enter this great game. The human element is what makes baseball such a great game.
Thanks for sharing your insights.

docgooden85Member since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  mduffy

The human element is as good as humans. By which I mean it is freakin’ terrible.

miltonfriedman
7 years ago

Astros are stupid. How do you know from the bench if a pitch is a ball or strike?

nathanjMember since 2024
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

From the bench, the pitch height is easily known. For the pitch horizontal location, and you can make an educated guess based on whether the catcher reaches as well as the reaction of the batter.

miltonfriedman
7 years ago
Reply to  nathanj

So, they are watch every pitch intently? nonsense. Astros were wrong. I think they should apologize to the umpire

Sarachim
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Even if the Astros were wrong about the call, one of the skills of a good umpire is de-escalating these conflicts so the game can continue with a minimum of drama. Instead of doing that, Kulpa had a tantrum, and kept yelling and shoving long after the Astros were ready to move on.

miltonfriedman
7 years ago
Reply to  Sarachim

Why is it up to the umpire? They are all grown adults.

Ryan DCMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Well it is literally his job

MookieBestt
7 years ago
Reply to  Ryan DC

Hey no fair, we shouldn’t hold the man on the field to do one job responsible for choosing not to do that job!

LHPSU
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

And the umpire isn’t one?

Pirates HurdlesMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Umm yes, they do. As a Little League manager I watch every pitch intently, I’m sure pros do it with even better frame of reference.

treinhal
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

are you being funny or dense? the Strike Zone Map from Brooks showed that pitch was like four or five inches low. not particularly close to being the correct call.

rosen380
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

While the angle from the dugout to the plate makes it tough, what they do have is (1) 30+ people sitting there with loads of experience seeing the balls from that angle, (2) one particular person with one of the three best seats in the house to judge balls vs strikes (the batter).

Captain Tenneal
7 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Well they were right, so…

6er
7 years ago

If I were an umpire I would be doing everything in my power to so why a human would be better than a robot when it comes to mediating a sporting event. I’ve seen umpires do mostly the opposite the last couple of years. Kulpa has taken it to a new extreme!

mike sixelMember since 2016
7 years ago

Given how bad some are at their job, a job they still have even though we have knowledge of their skill and attitude, I’m going with yes, they can do what they want with little fear of consequence.

OddBall Herrera
7 years ago

Has an ejected player ever simply refused to leave the field? This seems like the baseball version of a constitutional conflict.

Six Ten
7 years ago

I think they bring in an extrajudicial enforcement body (stadium security and/or the police) to resolve that situation.

But it’s not clear to me why the umpire would have the authority to do that if the stadium owner simply didn’t want it to happen. If the ejected player was on the home team and the owner refused consent to deploy stadium personnel that way, what could the umpire do about it?

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
7 years ago
Reply to  Six Ten

Call the game and wait for MLB to drop the hammer on the home team

Fernando
7 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

That’s what I was gonna say. I think it would be declared a forfeit, since the player was impeding the progress of the game. Then there would be a hefty suspension afterwards.

BenjaminMember since 2019
7 years ago
Reply to  Six Ten

I can only assume that, after the fact, the league would throw the book at anyone who tried it, since the power of the Umpires to toss people is fundamental to maintaining order.

London Yank
7 years ago

Ed Hickox seemed to take the position that he could call any strike zone he wanted yesterday. Aaron Judge was being called out on pitches crossing the plate at the middle of his shins. By the box score he K’d four times yesterday. If you watched the game he clearly should have walked in at least two of his at bats. This isn’t framing, it is just bad umpiring.

tb.25
7 years ago
Reply to  London Yank

Only two called strikes versus Judge yesterday were out of the zone – one was borderline (less than an inch too low) and one was egregiously bad, almost 6 inches below the zone. I found all that data on baseball savant’s search tool.

London Yank
7 years ago
Reply to  tb.25

You can’t trust the vertical positioning of the statcast strike zone for Aaron Judge. Statcast uses a database of previous umpire calls against a hitter to determine the vertical strike zone. This is problematic for Judge because umpires have always called the strike zone systematically wrong for him because of his extreme height. So, all the pitches at the bottom of the statcast strike zone for Judge are likely to be balls relative to the rule book strike zone. The pitch six inches below Judge’s statcast zone should have been called a ball for any hitter, Altuve included.

Note that Judge was also called out on a pitch six inches off the plate inside yesterday. Ed Hickox had a bad day and consequently so did Judge.

tb.25
7 years ago
Reply to  London Yank

The top/bottom of the strike zone are actually set by a human operator each pitch, based on the batter’s stance when the ball is halfway to home plate. It’s very reliable – as in if we had a better way of getting it, we’d be doing that. This is also why pitch-by-pitch it can vary by fractions of an inch within the same at-bat.

The 6-inch below the zone pitch should’ve been a ball no matter who was up to bat. Any pitch 6-inches below the zone is a ball.

And in the same data set, assuming the strike zone is the width of the plate, the only called strike outside the zone was the full-count called strike. It was four inches outside that zone… given it was a full count and the zone expands, it was likely more like 2 inches outside. Still a ball, though…

London Yank
7 years ago
Reply to  tb.25

In his article “The physics of Roboump”, David Kagan writes:

“PITCHf/x originally used poorly paid “stringers” to sit in a dark room under the stands and manually turn a dial to set the top and bottom of the zone on the video image of the batter. Saunders reports that Statcast uses the previous calls of major league umpires to build a database of the top and bottom of the strike zone for each hitter.”

In any case, you seem to be agreeing with my original point that Ed Hickox twice rung Aaron Judge up on pitches that should have been ball four. Losing two walks in a single game is a lot.

HughesMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  London Yank

The reality of it is that the strike zone is what the Umpire’s call it to be, and hollow of the knee and mid-point are guidelines. It’s a pretty static box that doesn’t adjust well to extreme sized players.

What this means is that Judge’s baseball career is one where the zone doesn’t adjust to his size, so it is shifted downward and not as large as it ought to be by the guidelines. It’s more like half way through the fat part of his calf to belly button.

The opposite is true with Jose Altuve, his zone is shifted up, and larger than it should be by the guidelines. It’s basically top of the knee to shoulders for him.

Jetsy Extrano
7 years ago

On April 1 I would kind of love to see an umpire courteously transmogrify their game into Calvinball by 8.03 ground rules.

CampingJosh
7 years ago
Reply to  Jetsy Extrano

That seems like a good promotion for some game. Probably not for any affiliated league, though.

DougMember since 2019
7 years ago
Reply to  Jetsy Extrano

Except for the courteous part, that sounds like Joe West.

david k
7 years ago

As long as Joe West and Angel Hernandez have jobs, I guess the umpires CAN do pretty much whatever the want and not be punished for their actions (have either of those guys been suspended in their careers for their outrageous conduct over the years?)

Speaking of ups doing “whatever the want”, there was some controversy in the Padres-Dbacks game the other day regarding Manny Machado’s “interference” call after the Dbacks catcher dropped a foul popup. Some say the ump made a completely bogus call, colored by the past reputation of Machado. Others say that “interference” is a complex and subtle situation, and blatant contact does not need to be made (yelling “I got it” near a fielder can be considered interference, see A Rod). I’m of the opinion that a player’s reputation SHOULD factor into a judgment call if a call could go either way, and the ump is trying to decide whether there was interference or not. That’s not in the umpire’s manual, I am sure, but it’s just one piece of a puzzle, and I think the umps would be correct to use it. Thoughts?

Pirates HurdlesMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  david k

Joe West’s strike zone on opening day in Cincy was awful, several inches outside was a strike all day. At least it was consistent for both teams, which is generally all most managers ask for.

david k
7 years ago
Reply to  david k

Since this is a Sheryl Ring legal article, my post should be viewed along the lines of when relevant “prior bad acts” should be admissible evidence.

Captain Tenneal
7 years ago
Reply to  david k

I agree. If that play had been anyone other than Machado, I would have given them the benefit of the doubt for grazing the catcher coming out of the box. But when you go out of your way to clip first basemen, I would be an idiot to assume he’s not doing the exact same thing here.

John DiFool2
7 years ago

Mea Kulpa.

wOBHey!
7 years ago

Bob Davidson used to crack me up. He’d take his mask off immediately and openly yell at people. And his normal, not angry face looked pissed off, so imagine when he’s in an argument!

User79
7 years ago

In short, there is a rule (MLB articles) that Kulpa broke, and an enforcer (MLB commissioner) for that violation.

But excellent discussion along the way including Star Wars and Tolkien references. If only Gandalf could use his midichlorian force to fix bad umpiring conduct.

bunslow
7 years ago

Dear everyone: even having an automated strikezone would not remove the home plate umpire role. There would still be a human being behind the plate who could make asinine decisions such as Kulpa’s.

Hank G.Member since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  bunslow

But, if there was an automated strike zone, and the players accepted it, they would not be arguing balls and strikes, and umpires would not have this type situation to elevate things.

Whatever you may think of instant replay, it has pretty much eliminated players and managers arguing over calls at the bases. They may not agree with the decision of the replay umpire, but they know that they at least got a review, and they move on.

Cidron
7 years ago

Old rule. If you, as an umpire, referee, or other similar, become noticeable by the fans, chances are you are calling a bad game. There are three teams out there. But, only two are supposed to be noticed.

evo34Member since 2023
7 years ago
Reply to  Cidron

That’s what got us the late-90s slugfest NHL and NBA. Pretty sure most of us don’t want that style of refereeing back.

The Other DougMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  evo34

There’s a huge difference between “not being noticed” and “abandoning your duty to enforce the rules”. In fact, it’s often the latter that will get you the most noticed (as, for example, in the most recent NFC Conference Final). Generally, if you do your job correctly, calmly, and efficiently, you won’t be noticed.

And btw, if you think the late-90s NHL was a slugfest, you’re obviously too young to remember the “Broad Street Bullies” of the mid-70s.

evo34Member since 2023
7 years ago
Reply to  The Other Doug

Grew up on minor league hockey in the 70s and 80s, so no…

If you remember, mid-70s hockey games averaged 6.5-7 goals per game, vs. just over 5 in the late 90s/early 2000s. A lot of factors were at play, but among them was the constant grabbing and holding that refs became conditioned to let slide over the years. The problem was solved by rule changes and by much stricter enforcement of existing rules. Similar story in the NBA.

As long as refs/umps are enforcing real rules that are designed to make the game better, I couldn’t care less how “noticeable” they are.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
7 years ago

Of course umpires can’t do what they want, how is that even worth a debate? Mlb does occasionally suspend umpires for a couple games if they go off too much. Joe west was suspended for 3 games in 2017.

The notion that umps are not controlled is a fan myth. Umpires are regularly cross checked against pitch fx or whatever it is called now and mlb does talk to them behind closed doors if there is a conflict. Umpires are employees of mlb and thus they have to follow certain rules.

I think the ump went too far but hinch also has a reputation of arguing balls and strikes with umpires.

Rich
7 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

Your entire reply hinges on one very simple (but massive) oversight:

Kulpa was the one who said he can do whatever he wants. He invited this very conversation.

Adding to that, this issue really had nothing to do with arguing calls. This had to do with Hinch taking exception to Kulpa inserting himself into the game and becoming an agitator via his conduct. He wanted a confrontation, and he made sure he got one. This is not an umpire’s job, and you could go so far as to say that it is the exact opposite of their job.

There is no positive spin for Kulpa in this. He had a bad night, and it was entirely his fault.

sooperspoon
7 years ago

This generation of kids sure do want to watch their favourite umpires play baseball. Huge fans of bullying, aggressive authority figures. Sarcasm aside, I think when an umpire is so compromised like this, the rest of the crew should react, shift him to second, calm him somehow. This is a travesty to the entire game.

Rich
7 years ago
Reply to  sooperspoon

I’m shocked that a discussion wasn’t had with the crew chief (Jerry Meals). I’d have played the rest of the game under protest.

evo34Member since 2023
7 years ago

” In fact, umpires get disciplined all the time.”

[cites single example from 2013]

Sheryl Ring in a nutshell.

evo34Member since 2023
7 years ago

These guys know they have 2-3 years max remaining as ball/strike arbiters — after which they become glorified PA announcers. So why not get your last licks in?

Eskuire
7 years ago

I wish MLB would put a microphone on the edges of the dugouts so we can actually hear what is being yelled at the umps [through a seperate channel, age verified of course lol]. Not that I’m stickin up for Kulpa’s behavior in any way shape or form. But working as a bouncer, I can tell you 95% of the time when someone has that kinda grin on their face Kulpa had, some real disrespectful shit was said to someone. It was just the way he motioned “you” and smiled like that which was what caught my eye, arguing balls and strikes is one thing, but for it to get under his skin THAT badly for the rest of the game causing him to act like that does raise some interesting questions as to what was said off camera from the dugout

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2020
7 years ago

Kulpa can do anything he wants and in his dream world scenario, he chose to be a shitty umpire.

Tooele Dave
7 years ago

I’d like to see a rule for umpires that would punish them if they took their mask off to escalate an discussion/argument during an inning. This case is a great example – by removing his mask, Kulpa escalated the situation. Obviously, between innings taking off your mask would be perfectly fine.